AD ORTALUM.

Though care, that unto me sore grief hath brought,

Calls me from converse with the sacred Nine,

Nor can my heart incline

To bring to any end inspired thought;--

(For now the wave of the Lethaean lake,

How recent hath it bathed in Death's dark vale

A brother's feet so pale;

And I can only sorrow for his sake.

The Trojan land on the Rhoetean shore

Hath hidden him for ever from these eyes,--

And I with glad surprise,

And brother's love, shall welcome thee no more.

Loved more than life, dear brother! what can I

But love thee still, and mourn for thee full long

In a funereal song,

In secret to assuage my grief thereby?

As amid many boughs all leaf-array'd

The Danlian bird, the nightingale, out-poured,

When Itys she deplored,

Her mellow sorrows in the thickest shade:)

Yet, Ortalus, 'mid tears that flow so fast,

The work of your Battiades I send,

Lest you should deem, dear friend,

Your wishes to the winds are idly cast,

And from my mind escaped, all unaware,

As falls the fruit, love's furtive gift, unbid,

In virgin bosom hid,

When she, forgetful of its lying there,

Would suddenly arise, and run to greet

The coming of her mother, from her vest

And her now loosen'd breast,

The shameless apple rolls before her feet.

And she, poor maid! abashed, and in the hush

Of shame, before her mother cannot speak,

While all her virgin cheek

Betrays her secret in the conscious blush.

CURATE.--It is very tender--the last image is delicately beautiful. I

did not translate it.

GRATIAN.--Pretty as the passage of the maiden's disaster in dropping the

lover's gift--and that, too, be it observed, in the hurry of her

tenderness, which increases the beauty, or rather accomplishes it--yet

is it not abrupt in a piece where there is the expression of so much

grief? Catullus was an affectionate man, more especially affectionate

brother; on other occasions, if I remember rightly, he deplores this

brother's loss. Now, Master Curate, what do you offer us?

CURATE.--Not now a verse translation, but an observation on a little

piece of raillery, in which Catullus quizzes one Arrius for his

aspirating; and, I mean it not as a pun, exasperating, though it should

seem that his friends were not a little exasperated at his bad

pronunciation. Do we inherit from the Romans this, our (Cockneyism, I

was going to say, but it is too general to allow of such a limit,)

vulgarity of speech? "Where," says Catullus, "Arrius meant to say

commoda, he uttered it as c_h_ommoda, and _h_insidias for insidias, and

never thought he spoke remarkably well unless he laid great stress upon

the aspirate, calling it with emphasis _h_insidias. I believe his

mother, his uncle, his maternal grandfather and grandmother all spoke in

the same way. When the man went into Syria, all ears had a little rest,

and heard those words pronounced without this emphatic aspirate, and

began to entertain no fears respecting the use of the words; when on a

sudden they hear--that after Arrius had gone thither, the Ionian seas

were no longer Ionian, but Hionian." This is curious. As the Romans had

possession here more than four hundred years, did they leave us this

legacy?

AQUILIUS--I will, then, give you versions of the two which immediately

follow.

Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 61, No. 380, June, 1847 · 第 37 / 61 题