The bearing of embryology upon classification is becoming every day

more important, rendering the processes of development among animals

one of the most interesting and instructive studies to which the

naturalist can devote himself, in the present state of his science.

The accuracy of this test, not only as explaining the relations

between animals now living, but as giving the clew to their connection

with those of past times, cannot but astonish any one who makes it the

basis of his investigations. The comparison of embryo forms with

fossil types is of course difficult, and must in many instances be

incomplete, for while, in the one case, death and decay have often

half destroyed the specimen, in the other, life has scarcely stamped

itself in legible characters on the new being. Yet, whenever such

comparisons have been successfully carried out, the result is always

the same; the present representatives of the fossil types recall in

their embryonic condition the ancient forms, and often explain their

true position in the animal kingdom. One of the most remarkable

examples of this in the type we are now considering, is that of the

Comatula already mentioned. Its condition in the earlier stages of

growth, when it is provided with a stem, at once shows its relation to

the old stemmed Crinoids, the earliest representatives of the class of

Echinoderms.

These coincidences are still more striking among living animals, where

they can be more readily and fully traced, and often give us a key to

their relative standing, which our knowledge of their anatomical

structure fails to furnish. This is perhaps nowhere more distinctly

seen than in the type of Radiates, where the Acalephs in their first

stages of growth, that is, in their Hydroid condition, remind us of

the adult forms among Polyps, showing the structural rank of the

Acalephs to be the highest, since they pass beyond a stage which is

permanent with the Polyps; while the adult forms of the Acalephs have

in their turn a certain resemblance to the embryonic phases of the

class next above them, the Echinoderms. Within the limits of the

classes, the same correspondence exists as between the different

orders; the embryonic forms of the higher Polyps recall the adult

forms of the lower ones, and the same is true of the Acalephs as far

as these phenomena have been followed and compared among them. In the

class of Echinoderms the comparison has been carried out to a

considerable extent, their classification has hitherto been based

chiefly upon the ambulacral system, so characteristic of the class,

but so unequally developed in the different orders. This places the

Holothurians, in which the ambulacral system has its greatest

development, at the head of the class; next to them come the

Sea-urchins or Echinoids; then the Star-fishes; then the Ophiurans and

Crinoids, in which the ambulacral system is reduced to a minimum.

Another basis for classification in this type, which gives the same

result, is the indication of a bilateral symmetry in some of the

orders. In the Holothurians, for instance, there is a decided tendency

toward the establishment of a posterior and anterior extremity, of a

right and left, an upper and lower side of the body. In the

Sea-urchins, in many of which the mouth is out of centre, placed

nearer one side than the other, this tendency is still apparent, while

in the three lower groups, the Star-fishes, Ophiurans, and Crinoids,

it is almost entirely lost, in the equal division of identical parts

radiating from a common centre. A comparison of the embryonic and

adult forms in these orders, confirms entirely this classification

based upon structural features. The Star-fishes, in their earlier

stages, resemble the mature Ophiurans, while the Crinoids, the lowest

group of all, retain throughout their whole existence many features

characteristic of the embryonic conditions of the higher Echinoderms.

In this principle of classification, already so fertile in results, we

may hope to find, in some instances, the solution of many perplexing

points respecting the structural rank of animals, the confirmation of

classifications already established; in others, an insight into the

true relations of groups which have hitherto been divided upon purely

arbitrary grounds.

* * * * *

DISTRIBUTION OF LIFE IN THE OCEAN.

We have seen that while our bay is rich in certain species, it is

wholly deficient or but scantily supplied with others, and that the

character of the animals inhabiting its waters is more or less

directly connected with general physical conditions. Such an area,

limited though it be, gives us some insight into the laws which, in

their wider application, control the distribution of marine life along

the shores of the most extensive continents. The coast of

Massachusetts, taken as a whole, is like that of New England

generally, a rocky coast; yet it has its sandy and muddy beaches, and

though it lies for a great part open to the sea, it has nevertheless

its sheltered harbors, its quiet bays and snug recesses.

A comparison of these limited localities with far more extensive

reaches of shore, where similar physical conditions prevail, shows

that they reproduce, in fainter and less various characters of course,

in proportion to their narrower boundaries, but still with a certain

fidelity, the same combinations of animal and vegetable life. In other

words, a sandy beach, however small, gives us some idea of the nature

of the animals we may look for on any sandy coast, as, for instance,

clams of various kinds, razor-shells, quahogs, snails, &c., creatures

who can penetrate the sand, drag themselves through it or over it,

leaving their winding trails as they go, and to whom the conditions

prevailing in such spots are genial. So the narrowest mud flat on the

sea-shore or muddy beach will give us the same dead and inanimate

aspect which characterizes a more extensive coast of like character,

where the gases always generated in mud are deadly to many kinds of

animals. The beings who find a home in such localities are of closely

allied species, chiefly a variety of worms, who burrow their way into

the mud, and seem to court the miasma so fatal to other creatures. The

same is true of any stony beach or rocky shore not more than a quarter

of a mile in length; it gives us an idea of the animal population on

any similar coast of greater extent.

These correspondences are of course modified by differences in

climatic conditions. The animals on a sandy beach or a rocky shore, on

the coast of Great Britain, for instance, are not absolutely identical

with those of a sandy beach or a rocky shore on the coast of New

England, but they are more or less nearly related to them. Naturalists

refer to this reiteration, all the world over, of like organic

combinations under similar circumstances, when they speak of

"representative species." The aggregate result is the same, though the

individual forms are slightly modified. And here lies one secret of

the infinite variety in nature, by which the old seems ever new, and

the same thought has an eternal freshness and originality, endlessly

repeated, yet never hackneyed.

In this sense our bay presents, on a miniature scale, a variety of

physical and organic combinations, which may be compared to those more

extensive divisions in the geographical distribution of animals and

plants, called by naturalists zoölogical or botanical provinces or

districts, the animal and vegetable populations of which are

technically designated as their faunæ and floræ. Such organic realms,

as we may call them, have long been recognized on land, and the most

extensive among them are easily distinguished. No one will fail to

recognize the tropical zone, with its royal dynasty of palms and all

the accompanying glories of a tropical vegetation, its birds of

brilliant plumage, its large Mammalia, lions, tigers, panthers,

elephants, and its great rivers haunted by gigantic reptiles. Nor is

the representation of vegetable and animal life less characteristic in

the temperate zone, where the oak is monarch of the woods, with all

his attendant court of elms, walnuts, beeches, birches, maples, and

the like, where birds of more sober hues, but sweeter voices, take the

place of the brilliant parrots and many-tinted humming-birds of the

tropical forest; while buffaloes, bears, wolves, foxes, and deer

represent the larger Mammalia. In the arctic zone, though marked by

peculiar and distinctive features, vegetation has dwindled to a

minimum; the birds are chiefly gulls and ducks, which go there for the

breeding season in the summer, and the reindeer and polar bears are

almost sole possessors of the snow and ice-fields; but this meagreness

in the representation of the larger land Mammalia is amply compensated

in the numbers of heavy aquatic Mammalia, the whales, walruses, seals,

and porpoises of the Arctic seas.

During the last half-century, since the geographical distribution of

animals and plants has become a subject of more careful investigation

among naturalists, these broad zones of the earth's surface, with

their characteristic populations and vegetation, have been subdivided,

according to more limited and special combinations of organic forms,

into narrower zoölogical and botanical areas. The application of these

results to marine life is however of much more recent date, and indeed

it would seem at first sight, as if the water, from its own nature,

could hardly impose a barrier so impassable as the land. The

localization of the marine faunæ and floræ is nevertheless as distinct

as that of terrestrial animals and plants, and late investigations

have done much to explain the connection of this distribution with

physical conditions.

A glance at the coast of our own continent, starting from the high

north and making the circuit of its shores, from Baffin's Bay to

Behring's Straits, will show us to what a variety of physical

influences the animals who live along its shores are subjected. On the

shores of Baffin's Bay, especially on the inner coast of Greenland,

where the glaciers push their way down to the very brink of the water,

and annually launch their southward-bound icebergs, we shall hardly

expect to find a very abundant littoral fauna. On its western shore,

where the ice does not advance so far, and a greater surface of rock

is exposed, the circumstances are more favorable to the development of

animal life. Here abound the winged Mollusks (Pteropods), often swept

down to the coast of Nova Scotia by the cold current from Baffin's

Bay; the "whale feed," as the fishermen call them, because the whales

devour them voraciously. Here occur also many compound Mollusks,

especially a variety of Ascidians, and the highly colored stocks of

Bryozoa. With them is found the Comatula of the northern waters, one

of the few modern Crinoids, and beside these a number of Star-fishes,

Sea-urchins, and Holothurians, not differing so essentially from those

already described as to require special mention.

Along the shore of Labrador and Newfoundland, the coast is wholly

rocky, and especially about Newfoundland it is deeply indented with

bays. Here there is ample opportunity for the growth of certain kinds

of animals in sheltered nooks. The number of species is, however, much

greater along the shores of Maine, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick than

in Labrador, owing no doubt to the milder climate. The beautiful shore

of Maine, with its countless islands, and broken, picturesque outline,

is very rich in species. Parts of this coast are remarkable for a

variety of naked Mollusks, as well as for the great numbers of

bright-colored Actiniæ, and also for the more brilliant kinds of

Holothurians, the Cuvieria, and the like. The latter are especially

abundant in the Bay of Fundy, and here also occurs the only Northern

representative on our coast of the Sea-fans or Gorgoniæ, so common on

the shores of Florida.

Farther south, from Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras, the character of the

coast changes; it becomes more sandy, and though here and there the

aspect is varied by a rocky promontory or a stony beach, yet the

general character is flat and sandy. With this new character of the

shore, the fauna is also greatly modified, and it is worthy of remark,

that while thus far the representative species have reflected the

character of animals to the north of them, they now begin to represent

rather those of the Carolina shores. South of Cape Cod come in a kind

of Scallop and Periwinkle, very different from the larger Scallops

found on the coast of Maine and the British Provinces; our Sea-urchin

is replaced by the Echinocidaris, with its few long spines, and an

entirely new set of Crustacea and Worms make their appearance on this

more sandy bottom. And here we must not forget that not only is the

aspect of the animal life changed, as we pass from a rock-bound to a

sandy coast, but that of the vegetation also. The various many-tinted

sea-weeds of the rocky shore disappear almost entirely, and their

place is but poorly supplied by the long eel-grass, which is almost

the only marine plant to be found in such a locality. Beside its more

sandy character, the coast from Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras is affected

by the large amount of fresh water poured into the sea along its whole

line, greatly modifying the character of the shore animals. The

Hudson, the Delaware, the Susquehanna, the Potomac, the James, the

Roanoke, and the large estuaries connected with some of these rivers,

give a very peculiar character to the shore, and bring down, not only

a vast supply of fresh water, but also a large quantity of detritus of

all sorts from the land. Under these circumstances life would be

impossible for many of the animals which live farther north. The only

locality on the North Atlantic shore, where the conditions are

somewhat similar, is at the mouth of the St. Lawrence, that great

drainage-bed through which the Canadian lakes empty their superfluous

waters into the Gulf of St. Lawrence.

The whole coast of the Carolinas, from Cape Hatteras to Florida, is a

sandy beach; but though in this respect it resembles that immediately

to the north of it, it differs greatly in other features.

Comparatively little fresh water is poured into the ocean along this

shore, and its more southerly range, instead of being protected by

sand-spits like Pamlico and Albemarle Sounds, or broken by estuaries

and inlets like the coast of Virginia, lies broadly open to the sea.

On its extensive beaches we have the large Pholas, burrowing deep

below the surface, and the Cerianthus, those long, cylindrical

Actiniæ, enclosed in sheaths, with their bright crowns of

gayly-colored tentacles; the free colonies of Halcyonoids abound also

on this coast, and a new set of Sea-urchins (Spatangoids and

Clypeastroids) make their appearance.

Farther south, along the Florida coast, a new element comes in, that

of the coral reefs, enclosing shallow channels near the shore, and

thus providing sheltered harbors on their leeward side, while on their

seaward side they slope steeply to the ocean. Beside this, the reef

itself affords a home for a great variety of creatures, who bore their

way into it and live in its recesses, as some insects live in the bark

of trees. Perhaps a more favorable combination of circumstances for

the development of marine life does not exist anywhere than about the

coral reefs of Florida, and certainly nowhere is there a more rich and

varied littoral fauna, especially on their western shore within the

Gulf of Mexico. Here swims the Portuguese Man-of-War, borne gayly

along on the surface of the water by its brilliant float, here the

blue Velella sets its oblique sail to the wind, and hosts of the

lighter and more brightly tinted corals fringe the shore with a

many-colored shrubbery. In these waters are also found the blue and

yellow Angel-fish, the Parrot-fish (Scarus), and the strange

Porcupine-fish (Diodon). Vegetable life is comparatively scanty in

these tropical waters, where there are scarcely any sea-weeds, except

the corallines or limestone Algæ of the reefs. The shore of the Gulf

of Mexico, as a whole, has much the same character as that of the

Carolinas, until we reach the point where the mountains and plateau of

Mexico come down to the coast. From this point to the Isthmus of

Panama the coast is again rocky.

Crossing the Isthmus and following the Pacific shore of the continent

northward, we find a sandy open shore alternating with rocky beaches

as far north as Acapulco. Along this coast there is to be found a

great variety of corals, especially Sea-fans, growing on the rocks,

but no reef. The Pocillopora, an Acalephian coral, the Pacific

representative of the Millepore of Florida, is especially abundant. On

the peninsula of Lower California we come again upon a rocky coast,

with steep bluffs, extending into the sea. Within the Gulf of

California are found, on its sandy coast, peculiar kinds of

Sea-urchins, Spatangoids, and Clypeastroids, which occur nowhere else

on this coast. From Cape St. Lucas up to the Straits of Fuca, with the

exception of the large estuary forming the Bay of San Francisco, there

are scarcely a couple of harbors of any consequence. The whole shore

is most inhospitable, and the violent northwest winds in summer, and

the southeast winds in winter, render it still more bleak and

difficult of approach. In consequence of these conditions, the fauna

is scanty along a great part of the shore; the best spots for

collecting are the beaches, near the head of the peninsula, opposite

the islands of Santa Barbara and San Diego, and that within the harbor

of San Francisco. On the former, large Craw-fishes abound (Palinurus),

akin to those of Florida, though specifically different from them. In

the latter, the great amount of fresh water prevents the fauna from

being exclusively marine; this harbor is, nevertheless, the great

centre of the viviparous fishes, and contains also a large variety of

peculiarly shaped Sculpins.

Farther north, between the Straits of Fuca and the island of Sitka,

the shore resembles that of Maine, with its many islands, bays, and

inlets; a succession of long, narrow islands forms a barrier along the

coast, enclosing the shore waters, so as almost to make them into an

inland sea. But little fresh water empties upon this part of the

coast, and here, where the salt water is little modified by any

deposit from the land, but where the violence of the ocean is broken

by this barrier of islands, there is a full development of marine

life. The shores of the Gulf of Georgia, and those of Vancouver's

Island, seem to be especially the home of the Star-fishes. The fauna

of this locality has been but little investigated, and yet the number

of species of Star-fishes known from there is greater than from any

other region; many of them are of colossal size, measuring some four

feet in diameter. This coast seems also very favorable for the

development of Hydroids, in consequence of which its waters swarm with

a variety of Jelly-fishes. The Pennatula, that pretty compound

Halcyonoid, with its feather-like sprays, is another characteristic

type of this fauna. Beyond this, from Sitka to Behring's Straits, the

same rocky coast prevails as in Labrador and Greenland. In Behring's

Straits we return again to the forests of beautiful compound Mollusks,

or rather to a variety of "representative species," resembling the

Bryozoa and Ascidians so abundant in Baffin's Bay. The depth of the

water, however, is much less here than on the corresponding Atlantic

coast, where, south of Greenland, along the shore of Labrador, the

water is very deep, while in Behring's Straits the depth is not

greater than from one hundred to one hundred and twenty fathoms. The

respective faunæ of these two shores are also affected by the

difference of temperature, the cold current from Baffin's Bay sweeping

down upon the coast of Labrador, while, through Behring's Straits, the

warm current from the Pacific pours into the Arctic Ocean.

Thus the whole coast of our continent is peopled more or less thickly

with animals. But now arises a new set of inquiries; how far into the

sea do these animals extend? how wide is their domain? Do they wander

at will in the ocean, or are they bound by any law to keep within a

certain distance of the shore? These questions would seem to be easily

answered, for wherever we go on the surface of the sea, and as far as

the eye can penetrate into its depths, we find it full of life; and

yet a closer examination shows that all these beings have their

appointed boundaries. Along the shores, animal and vegetable life

seems to be distributed in certain definite combinations. Those who

are familiar with rocky beaches readily recognize the different bands

of color produced by the various kinds of sea-weed growing at given

distances between high and low-water-mark. First comes the olive green

rockweed (the Fucus), and with it are found barnacles and small

Crustacea, myriads of which are to be seen hopping about in this

rockweed when the tide is out. Below these are the brown crispy

Rhodersperms and Melanosperms, and associated with them are

Star-fishes, Crabs, and Cockles. Next in order is the Laminarian zone.

Here we have the broad fronds of the Laminaria, the "devil's aprons,"

as the fishermen call them; in this zone is the home of the

Sea-urchin, and here will be found also a few small fishes. Lastly we

have the Coralline zone, so called on account of the lime deposit in

the sea-weeds, giving them the rigidity of corals; among these the

Lobsters make their appearance, and here are to be found also numerous

clusters of Hydroids, the nurses of the Jelly-fishes.

This distribution is not casual; these belts of animal and vegetable

life are sharply defined and so constantly associated, that they must

be controlled by the same physical laws. The first important

investigations on this subject were made by Örsted, the distinguished

Danish naturalist. He undertook a complete topographical survey of the

coast near which he lived, carrying his soundings to a depth of some

twelve fathoms, and found that both the fauna and flora of the shore

were divided, according to the depth of the water, into bands of

vegetable and animal life, corresponding very nearly with those given

above. His observations were, however, limited, not extending beyond

the neighborhood of his home. It is to Edward Forbes, the great

English naturalist, whose short life was so rich in results for

science, that we owe a more complete and extensive investigation of

the whole subject.

[Illustration: Diagram of a rocky beach.]

Seaside Studies in Natural History. Marine Animals of Massachusetts Bay. Radiates. · 第 10 / 11 段