SIMON OF SUDBURY, ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY.

In a niche in the vestry of St. Gregory's Church, Sudbury, Suffolk, is

preserved the skull of the murdered archbishop: beneath the niche is

placed the following inscription, which appears to me worthy of a place

in your pages:--

"The head of Simon Theobald, who was born at Sudbury, and thence

called Simon of Sudbury; he was sent when but a youth into foreign

parts to study the civil law, whereof he was made doctor: he

visited most of the universities of France, was made chaplain to

Pope Innocent, and auditor rotæ, or judge of the Roman court. By

the interest of this Pope he was made Chancellor of Salisbury. In

the year 1361, he was consecrated Bishop of London; and in the

year 1375 was translated to the see of Canterbury, and made

Chancellor of England. While he was Bishop of London he built the

upper part of St. Gregory's in Sudbury; and where his father's

house stood he erected a college of secular priests, and endowed

it with the yearly revenue of one hundred and twenty-two pounds

eighteen shillings, and was at length barbarously beheaded upon

Tower Hill, in London, by the rabble in Wat Tyler's Rebellion, in

the reign of Richard II. 1382."

This inscription is written in an old hand on a piece of parchment. On

turning to Stow's _Annales_ for an account of these transactions, I find

a very interesting relation of the circumstances above mentioned. I

trust to be excused if I add a few brief extracts. King Richard had

ordered the Tower gates to be opened to the rebels, though--

"There was the same time in the Tower 600 warlike men, furnished

with armour and weapon, expert men in armes, and 600 archers, all

which did quaile in stomacke."

Stow's _Annales_ (edit. 1601, 4to.), p. 457.

The rebels having entered, conducted themselves with unbridled license,

and "with terrible noyse and fury" laid hands on the archbishop, "drew

him out of the chappell," and proceeded at once to put him to death:

"He, kneeling downe, offered his necke to him that should strike

it off; being stricken in the necke, but not deadly, he putting

his hande to his necke, said thus, _a ha_, it is the hand of God:

he had not removed his hand from the place where the payne was,

but that being sodainly stricken, his fingers ends being cut off,

and part of the arteries, he fell downe; but yet he died not, till

being mangled with eight strokes in the necke, and in the heade,

he fulfilled most worthy martyrdome."

Stow's _Annales_, p. 458.

Thus "barbarously" was the prelate murdered; the rebels then took his

head, fastened it "on a pole, and set it on London bridge, in place

where-before stood the head of Sir _John_ Minstarworth." (_Ibid._) Stow

proceeds to relate some more particulars relative to the archbishop's

history, stating that "he builded the upper end," that is, I conceive,

the chancel "of _St. Gregorie's_ Church at Sudbury;" and concludes his

account by saying:

"He was slaine as ye haue heard, and afterwards buried in the

Cathedral Church of Canterbury."

_Ibid._

Now Godwin, in his valuable work _De Presulibus_, states, that his body

was buried under the high altar of St. Dunstan's, Canterbury. But in

Winkle's _Cathedrals_ (London, 1836), vol. i. p. 38., we find Stow's

account corroborated; for--

"The monument of Archbishop Sudbury, who was beheaded in 1381

[1382], is in the northern aisle, nearly parallel with the altar;

it bears no effigy, but is surmounted by a sumptuous canopy of

very elegant architectural design, but now much mutilated."

Of course, the fact that his monument is in the cathedral, does not

_prove_ that his body was buried there. I shall be glad to learn from

any of your correspondents, what evidence there is for Godwin's

assertion. Gostling, in his _Walk in and about the City of Canterbury_

(5th edit. Cant. 1804), though he mentions the prelate's benefactions to

the cathedral (pp. 12. 79.), and his tomb (p. 220.), does not state his

place of sepulture. At p. 60., however (note [++]), in a brief notice of

St. Dunstan's Church, he says:

"In a vault under the family chancel of Roper _here_ is kept a

skull, said to be that of the great Sir Thomas More; it is in a

niche of the wall, secured with an iron grate, though some say his

favourite daughter, Margaret Roper, who lies here, desired to be

buried with it in her arms. The vault being full, was closed up

not many years since."

This curious coincidence is at least worth noting.

I trust that the interest necessarily attaching to any remains of so

celebrated an historical personage, will prove a sufficient apology to

your readers for the length of this note.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 122, February 28, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 32 / 167 题