OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

_My Face is My Fortune_, by Messrs. PHILIPS and FENDALL. Why don't

they agree to spell both names with an "F," and make it FILLIPS and

FENDALL. I fancy that FENDALL couldn't do without the sensational

fillips. This story excites curiosity throughout the first volume,

and then, in the other volume, satisfies it in so disappointing and

commonplace a fashion as to suggest the idea that one of the authors,

becoming weary of his share in the work, suddenly chucked it up,

and said, "Oh, bother! let's finish anyhow;" and then the other

_collaborateur_, whichever it was, did finish it as best and as

quickly as he could. There is evidence of laziness or of lack of

invention in the story. If it were for the first time in fiction that

a secret is learnt by some one hiding behind some pantomime plants

in a conservatory, then too much praise could not be bestowed on the

ingenious devisers of so strong and original a situation. But as "we

know that situation,--he comes from Sheffield," and as it has done

duty some scores of times before, on or off the stage, why, the

thoroughgoing novel-reader shakes his head and asks, "Couldn't they

have devised something better than this between them?" "I expected

much from this combination in Authorship, and am disappointed," says

the candid BARON DE BOOK-WORMS.

* * * * *

[Illustration: WHAT OUR ARTIST (THE NEWLY-MARRIED ONE)

HAS TO PUT UP WITH.

_Our Artist_. "JUST LOOK, DARLING! I WAS SHORT OF CANVASSES, SO I'VE

STRETCHED A CLEAN POCKET-HANDKERCHIEF!--SEE HOW SPLENDIDLY IT TAKES

THE PAINT!"

_His Prudent Little Wife._. "OH, JOHN DEAR, HOW EXTRAVAGANT OF YOU!

_IT'LL NEVER COME OUT!_"]

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 100, May 9, 1891 · 第 18 / 25 题