_Brooke._ Oh that anything so monstrous should exist in this profusion

and prodigality of blessings! The herbs, elastic with health, seem to

partake of sensitive and animated life, and to feel under my hand the

benediction I would bestow on them. What a hum of satisfaction in

God's creatures! How is it, Sidney, the smallest do seem the happiest?

_Sidney._ Compensation for their weaknesses and their fears;

compensation for the shortness of their existence. Their spirits mount

upon the sunbeam above the eagle; and they have more enjoyment in

their one summer than the elephant in his century.

_Brooke._ Are not also the little and lowly in our species the most

happy?

_Sidney._ I would not willingly try nor over-curiously examine it. We,

Greville, are happy in these parks and forests: we were happy in my

close winter-walk of box and laurustine. In our earlier days did we

not emboss our bosoms with the daffodils, and shake them almost unto

shedding with our transport? Ay, my friend, there is a greater

difference, both in the stages of life and in the seasons of the year,

than in the conditions of men: yet the healthy pass through the

seasons, from the clement to the inclement, not only unreluctantly

but rejoicingly, knowing that the worst will soon finish, and the best

begin anew; and we are desirous of pushing forward into every stage of

life, excepting that alone which ought reasonably to allure us most,

as opening to us the _Via Sacra_, along which we move in triumph to

our eternal country. We may in some measure frame our minds for the

reception of happiness, for more or for less; we should, however, well

consider to what port we are steering in search of it, and that even

in the richest its quantity is but too exhaustible. There is a

sickliness in the firmest of us, which induceth us to change our side,

though reposing ever so softly: yet, wittingly or unwittingly, we turn

again soon into our old position.

God hath granted unto both of us hearts easily contented, hearts

fitted for every station, because fitted for every duty. What appears

the dullest may contribute most to our genius; what is most gloomy may

soften the seeds and relax the fibres of gaiety. We enjoy the

solemnity of the spreading oak above us: perhaps we owe to it in part

the mood of our minds at this instant; perhaps an inanimate thing

supplies me, while I am speaking, with whatever I possess of

animation. Do you imagine that any contest of shepherds can afford

them the same pleasure as I receive from the description of it; or

that even in their loves, however innocent and faithful, they are so

free from anxiety as I am while I celebrate them? The exertion of

intellectual power, of fancy and imagination, keeps from us greatly

more than their wretchedness, and affords us greatly more than their

enjoyment. We are motes in the midst of generations: we have our

sunbeams to circuit and climb. Look at the summits of the trees around

us, how they move, and the loftiest the most: nothing is at rest

within the compass of our view, except the grey moss on the

park-pales. Let it eat away the dead oak, but let it not be compared

with the living one.

Poets are in general prone to melancholy; yet the most plaintive ditty

hath imparted a fuller joy, and of longer duration, to its composer,

than the conquest of Persia to the Macedonian. A bottle of wine

bringeth as much pleasure as the acquisition of a kingdom, and not

unlike it in kind: the senses in both cases are confused and

perverted.

_Brooke._ Merciful Heaven! and for the fruition of an hour's

drunkenness, from which they must awaken with heaviness, pain, and

terror, men consume a whole crop of their kind at one harvest home.

Shame upon those light ones who carol at the feast of blood! and worse

upon those graver ones who nail upon their escutcheon the name of

great! Ambition is but Avarice on stilts and masked. God sometimes

sends a famine, sometimes a pestilence, and sometimes a hero, for the

chastisement of mankind; none of them surely for our admiration. Only

some cause like unto that which is now scattering the mental fog of

the Netherlands, and is preparing them for the fruits of freedom, can

justify us in drawing the sword abroad.

_Sidney._ And only the accomplishment of our purpose can permit us

again to sheathe it; for the aggrandizement of our neighbour is nought

of detriment to us: on the contrary, if we are honest and industrious,

his wealth is ours. We have nothing to dread while our laws are

equitable and our impositions light: but children fly from mothers who

strip and scourge them.

_Brooke._ We are come to an age when we ought to read and speak

plainly what our discretion tells us is fit: we are not to be set in a

corner for mockery and derision, with our hands hanging down

motionless and our pockets turned inside out.

* * * * *

But away, away with politics: let not this city-stench infect our

fresh country air!

* * * * *

FOOTNOTE:

[6] Censurable as that practice may appear, it belonged to the age of

Sidney. Amusements were permitted the English on the seventh day, nor

were they restricted until the Puritans gained the ascendancy.

SOUTHEY AND PORSON

_Porson._ I suspect, Mr. Southey, you are angry with me for the

freedom with which I have spoken of your poetry and Wordsworth's.

_Southey._ What could have induced you to imagine it, Mr. Professor?

You have indeed bent your eyes upon me, since we have been together,

with somewhat of fierceness and defiance: I presume you fancied me to

be a commentator. You wrong me in your belief that any opinion on my

poetical works hath molested me; but you afford me more than

compensation in supposing me acutely sensible of injustice done to

Wordsworth. If we must converse on these topics, we will converse on

him. What man ever existed who spent a more inoffensive life, or

adorned it with nobler studies?

_Porson._ I believe so; and they who attack him with virulence are men

of as little morality as reflection. I have demonstrated that one of

them, he who wrote the _Pursuits of Literature_, could not construe a

Greek sentence or scan a verse; and I have fallen on the very _Index_

from which he drew out his forlorn hope on the parade. This is

incomparably the most impudent fellow I have met with in the course of

my reading, which has lain, you know, in a province where impudence is

no rarity.

* * * * *

I had visited a friend in _King's Road_ when he entered.

'Have you seen the _Review_?' cried he. 'Worse than ever! I am

resolved to insert a paragraph in the papers, declaring that I had no

concern in the last number.'

'Is it so very bad?' said I, quietly.

'Infamous! detestable!' exclaimed he.

'Sit down, then: nobody will believe you,' was my answer.

Since that morning he has discovered that I drink harder than usual,

that my faculties are wearing fast away, that once, indeed, I had some

Greek in my head, but--he then claps the forefinger to the side of his

nose, turns his eye slowly upward, and looks compassionately and

calmly.

_Southey._ Come, Mr. Porson, grant him his merits: no critic is better

contrived to make any work a monthly one, no writer more dexterous in

giving a finishing touch.

_Porson._ The plagiary has a greater latitude of choice than we; and

if he brings home a parsnip or turnip-top, when he could as easily

have pocketed a nectarine or a pineapple, he must be a blockhead. I

never heard the name of the _Pursuer of Literature_, who has little

more merit in having stolen than he would have had if he had never

stolen at all; and I have forgotten that other man's, who evinced his

fitness to be the censor of our age, by a translation of the most

naked and impure satires of antiquity--those of Juvenal, which owe

their preservation to the partiality of the friars. I shall entertain

an unfavourable opinion of him if he has translated them well: pray,

has he?

_Southey._ Indeed, I do not know. I read poets for their poetry, and

to extract that nutriment of the intellect and of the heart which

poetry should contain. I never listen to the swans of the cesspool,

and must declare that nothing is heavier to me than rottenness and

corruption.

_Porson._ You are right, sir, perfectly right. A translator of Juvenal

would open a public drain to look for a needle, and may miss it. My

nose is not easily offended; but I must have something to fill my

belly. Come, we will lay aside the scrip of the transpositor and the

pouch of the pursuer, in reserve for the days of unleavened bread;

and again, if you please, to the lakes and mountains. Now we are both

in better humour, I must bring you to a confession that in your friend

Wordsworth there is occasionally a little trash.

_Southey._ A haunch of venison would be trash to a Brahmin, a bottle

of Burgundy to the xerif of Mecca. We are guided by precept, by habit,

by taste, by constitution. Hitherto our sentiments on poetry have been

delivered down to us from authority; and if it can be demonstrated, as

I think it may be, that the authority is inadequate, and that the

dictates are often inapplicable and often misinterpreted, you will

allow me to remove the cause out of court. Every man can see what is

very bad in a poem; almost every one can see what is very good: but

you, Mr. Porson, who have turned over all the volumes of all the

commentators, will inform me whether I am right or wrong in asserting

that no critic hath yet appeared who hath been able to fix or to

discern the exact degrees of excellence above a certain point.

_Porson._ None.

_Southey._ The reason is, because the eyes of no one have been upon a

level with it. Supposing, for the sake of argument, the contest of

Hesiod and Homer to have taken place: the judges who decided in favour

of the worse, and he, indeed, in poetry has little merit, may have

been elegant, wise, and conscientious men. Their decision was in

favour of that to the species of which they had been the most

accustomed. Corinna was preferred to Pindar no fewer than five times,

and the best judges in Greece gave her the preference; yet whatever

were her powers, and beyond a question they were extraordinary, we may

assure ourselves that she stood many degrees below Pindar. Nothing is

more absurd than the report that the judges were prepossessed by her

beauty. Plutarch tells us that she was much older than her competitor,

who consulted her judgment in his earlier odes. Now, granting their

first competition to have been when Pindar was twenty years old, and

that the others were in the years succeeding, her beauty must have

been somewhat on the decline; for in Greece there are few women who

retain the graces, none who retain the bloom of youth, beyond the

twenty-third year. Her countenance, I doubt not, was expressive: but

expression, although it gives beauty to men, makes women pay dearly

for its stamp, and pay soon. Nature seems, in protection to their

loveliness, to have ordered that they who are our superiors in

quickness and sensibility should be little disposed to laborious

thought, or to long excursions in the labyrinths of fancy. We may be

convinced that the verdict of the judges was biased by nothing else

than the habitudes of thinking; we may be convinced, too, that living

in an age when poetry was cultivated highly, and selected from the

most acute and the most dispassionate, they were subject to no greater

errors of opinion than are the learned messmates of our English

colleges.

_Porson._ You are more liberal in your largesses to the fair Greeks

than a friend of mine was, who resided in Athens to acquire the

language. He assured me that beauty there was in bud at thirteen, in

full blossom at fifteen, losing a leaf or two every day at seventeen,

trembling on the thorn at nineteen, and under the tree at twenty.

_Southey._ Mr. Porson, it does not appear to me that anything more is

necessary, in the first instance, than to interrogate our hearts in

what manner they have been affected. If the ear is satisfied; if at

one moment a tumult is aroused in the breast, and tranquillized at

another, with a perfect consciousness of equal power exerted in both

cases; if we rise up from the perusal of the work with a strong

excitement to thought, to imagination, to sensibility; above all, if

we sat down with some propensities toward evil, and walk away with

much stronger toward good, in the midst of a world which we never had

entered and of which we never had dreamed before--shall we perversely

put on again the _old man_ of criticism, and dissemble that we have

been conducted by a most beneficent and most potent genius? Nothing

proves to me so manifestly in what a pestiferous condition are its

lazarettos, as when I observe how little hath been objected against

those who have substituted words for things, and how much against

those who have reinstated things for words.

Let Wordsworth prove to the world that there may be animation without

blood and broken bones, and tenderness remote from the stews. Some

will doubt it; for even things the most evident are often but little

perceived and strangely estimated. Swift ridiculed the music of Handel

and the generalship of Marlborough; Pope the perspicacity and the

scholarship of Bentley; Gray the abilities of Shaftesbury and the

eloquence of Rousseau. Shakespeare hardly found those who would

collect his tragedies; Milton was read from godliness; Virgil was

antiquated and rustic; Cicero, Asiatic. What a rabble has persecuted

my friend! An elephant is born to be consumed by ants in the midst of

his unapproachable solitudes: Wordsworth is the prey of Jeffrey. Why

repine? Let us rather amuse ourselves with allegories, and recollect

that God in the creation left His noblest creature at the mercy of a

serpent.

* * * * *

_Porson._ Wordsworth goes out of his way to be attacked; he picks up a

piece of dirt, throws it on the carpet in the midst of the company,

and cries, _This is a better man than any of you!_ He does indeed

mould the base material into what form he chooses; but why not rather

invite us to contemplate it than challenge us to condemn it? Here

surely is false taste.

_Southey._ The principal and the most general accusation against him

is, that the vehicle of his thoughts is unequal to them. Now did ever

the judges at the Olympic games say: 'We would have awarded to you the

meed of victory, if your chariot had been equal to your horses: it is

true they have won; but the people are displeased at a car neither new

nor richly gilt, and without a gryphon or sphinx engraved on the

axle'? You admire simplicity in Euripides; you censure it in

Wordsworth: believe me, sir, it arises in neither from penury of

thought--which seldom has produced it--but from the strength of

temperance, and at the suggestion of principle.

Take up a poem of Wordsworth's and read it--I would rather say, read

them all; and, knowing that a mind like yours must grasp closely what

comes within it, I will then appeal to you whether any poet of our

country, since Milton, hath exerted greater powers with less of strain

and less of ostentation. I would, however, by his permission, lay

before you for this purpose a poem which is yet unpublished and

incomplete.

_Porson._ Pity, with such abilities, he does not imitate the ancients

somewhat more.

_Southey._ Whom did they imitate? If his genius is equal to theirs he

has no need of a guide. He also will be an ancient; and the very

counterparts of those who now decry him will extol him a thousand

years hence in malignity to the moderns.

THE ABBÉ DELILLE AND WALTER LANDOR

The Abbé Delille was the happiest of creatures, when he could weep

over the charms of innocence and the country in some crowded and

fashionable circle at Paris. We embraced most pathetically on our

first meeting there, as if the one were condemned to quit the earth,

the other to live upon it.

_Delille._ You are reported to have said that descriptive poetry has

all the merits of a handkerchief that smells of roses?

_Landor._ This, if I said it, is among the things which are neither

false enough nor true enough to be displeasing. But the Abbé Delille

has merits of his own. To translate Milton well is more laudable than

originality in trifling matters; just as to transport an obelisk from

Egypt, and to erect it in one of the squares, must be considered a

greater labour than to build a new chandler's shop.

_Delille._ Milton is indeed extremely difficult to translate; for,

however noble and majestic, he is sometimes heavy, and often rough and

unequal.

_Landor._ Dear Abbé, porphyry is heavy, gold is heavier; Ossa and

Olympus are rough and unequal; the steppes of Tartary, though high,

are of uniform elevation: there is not a rock, nor a birch, nor a

cytisus, nor an arbutus upon them great enough to shelter a

new-dropped lamb. Level the Alps one with another, and where is their

sublimity? Raise up the vale of Tempe to the downs above, and where

are those sylvan creeks and harbours in which the imagination watches

while the soul reposes; those recesses in which the gods partook the

weaknesses of mortals, and mortals the enjoyments of the gods?

You have treated our poet with courtesy and distinction; in your

trimmed and measured dress, he might be taken for a Frenchman. Do not

think me flattering. You have conducted Eve from Paradise to Paris,

and she really looks prettier and smarter than before she tripped.

With what elegance she rises from a most awful dream! You represent

her (I repeat your expression) as springing up _en sursaut_, as if

you had caught her asleep and tickled the young creature on that sofa.

Homer and Virgil have been excelled in sublimity by Shakespeare and

Milton, as the Caucasus and Atlas of the old world by the Andes and

Teneriffe of the new; but you would embellish them all.

_Delille._ I owe to Voltaire my first sentiment of admiration for

Milton and Shakespeare.

_Landor._ He stuck to them as a woodpecker to an old forest-tree, only

for the purpose of picking out what was rotten: he has made the holes

deeper than he found them, and, after all his cries and chatter, has

brought home but scanty sustenance to his starveling nest.

_Delille._ You must acknowledge that there are fine verses in his

tragedies.

_Landor._ Whenever such is the first observation, be assured, M.

l'Abbé, that the poem, if heroic or dramatic, is bad. Should a work of

this kind be excellent, we say, 'How admirably the characters are

sustained! What delicacy of discrimination! There is nothing to be

taken away or altered without an injury to the part or to the whole.'

We may afterward descend on the versification. In poetry, there is a

greater difference between the good and the excellent than there is

between the bad and the good. Poetry has no golden mean; mediocrity

here is of another metal, which Voltaire, however, had skill enough to

encrust and polish. In the least wretched of his tragedies, whatever

is tolerable is Shakespeare's; but, gracious Heaven! how deteriorated!

When he pretends to extol a poet he chooses some defective part, and

renders it more so whenever he translates it. I will repeat a few

verses from Metastasio in support of my assertion. Metastasio was both

a better critic and a better poet, although of the second order in

each quality; his tyrants are less philosophical, and his chambermaids

less dogmatic. Voltaire was, however, a man of abilities, and author

of many passable epigrams, beside those which are contained in his

tragedies and heroics; yet it must be confessed that, like your

Parisian lackeys, they are usually the smartest when out of place.

_Delille._ What you call epigram gives life and spirit to grave works,

and seems principally wanted to relieve a long poem. I do not see why

what pleases us in a star should not please us in a constellation.

DIOGENES AND PLATO

_Diogenes._ Stop! stop! come hither! Why lookest thou so scornfully

and askance upon me?

_Plato._ Let me go! loose me! I am resolved to pass.

_Diogenes._ Nay, then, by Jupiter and this tub! thou leavest three

good ells of Milesian cloth behind thee. Whither wouldst thou amble?

_Plato._ I am not obliged in courtesy to tell you.

_Diogenes._ Upon whose errand? Answer me directly.

_Plato._ Upon my own.

_Diogenes._ Oh, then, I will hold thee yet awhile. If it were upon

another's, it might be a hardship to a good citizen, though not to a

good philosopher.

_Plato._ That can be no impediment to my release: you do not think me

one.

_Diogenes._ No, by my Father Jove!

_Plato._ Your father!

_Diogenes._ Why not? Thou shouldst be the last man to doubt it. Hast

not thou declared it irrational to refuse our belief to those who

assert that they are begotten by the gods, though the assertion (these

are thy words) be unfounded on reason or probability? In me there is a

chance of it: whereas in the generation of such people as thou art

fondest of frequenting, who claim it loudly, there are always too many

competitors to leave it probable.

_Plato._ Those who speak against the great do not usually speak from

morality, but from envy.

_Diogenes._ Thou hast a glimpse of the truth in this place, but as

thou hast already shown thy ignorance in attempting to prove to me

what a _man_ is, ill can I expect to learn from thee what is a _great

man_.

_Plato._ No doubt your experience and intercourse will afford me the

information.

_Diogenes._ Attend, and take it. The great man is he who hath nothing

to fear and nothing to hope from another. It is he who, while he

demonstrates the iniquity of the laws, and is able to correct them,

obeys them peaceably. It is he who looks on the ambitious both as weak

and fraudulent. It is he who hath no disposition or occasion for any

kind of deceit, no reason for being or for appearing different from

what he is. It is he who can call together the most select company

when it pleases him.

_Plato._ Excuse my interruption. In the beginning of your definition I

fancied that you were designating your own person, as most people do

in describing what is admirable; now I find that you have some other

in contemplation.

_Diogenes._ I thank thee for allowing me what perhaps I _do_ possess,

but what I was not then thinking of; as is often the case with rich

possessors: in fact, the latter part of the description suits me as

well as any portion of the former.

_Plato._ You may call together the best company, by using your hands

in the call, as you did with me; otherwise I am not sure that you

would succeed in it.

_Diogenes._ My thoughts are my company; I can bring them together,

select them, detain them, dismiss them. Imbecile and vicious men

cannot do any of these things. Their thoughts are scattered, vague,

uncertain, cumbersome: and the worst stick to them the longest; many

indeed by choice, the greater part by necessity, and accompanied, some

by weak wishes, others by vain remorse.

_Plato._ Is there nothing of greatness, O Diogenes! in exhibiting how

cities and communities may be governed best, how morals may be kept

the purest, and power become the most stable?

_Diogenes._ _Something_ of greatness does not constitute the great

man. Let me, however, see him who hath done what thou sayest: he must

be the most universal and the most indefatigable traveller, he must

also be the oldest creature, upon earth.

_Plato._ How so?

_Diogenes._ Because he must know perfectly the climate, the soil, the

situation, the peculiarities, of the races, of their allies, of their

enemies; he must have sounded their harbours, he must have measured

the quantity of their arable land and pasture, of their woods and

mountains; he must have ascertained whether there are fisheries on

their coasts, and even what winds are prevalent. On these causes, with

some others, depend the bodily strength, the numbers, the wealth, the

wants, the capacities of the people.

_Plato._ Such are low thoughts.

Imaginary Conversations and Poems: A Selection · 第 6 / 32 段