X.

_THE EXAMPLE OF THE PROPHETS._

"Take, my brethren, the prophets, who have spoken in the name of the

Lord, for an example."—JAMES v. 10.

We possess the books produced in olden times by a number of different

nations. Each national literature has its own peculiarities. The

literature of Israel has various features that are very characteristic

of it. Among them all, one stands out and is unique. All along the

nation had a conviction that they were destined to be the greatest

nation in the world, and they believed that this destiny of theirs lay

in the fact that through their government the world was to be made good,

righteous, holy, and happy. They believed that God had a large plan,

embracing the whole world in its operations; they believed that God was

using all the different races as tools to work out that design of His;

but they held that infinitely beyond all lesser instruments, He had made

up His mind to employ Israel in accomplishing that great purpose of His

high heart; through Israel He was to make the whole world into one

Divine kingdom, ruled by Himself, and reverencing Himself as the one

only God and Lord.

The mass of the people constantly forgot that sense of a lofty destiny;

they constantly tired of that great ideal; they chose to prefer present

gain and advantage; they disregarded that predicted end of their history

in determining their contemporary policy in relation to other nations;

they were dumb, and blind, and deaf to that feeling of God's movement in

history and His purpose for the future. Nevertheless, in every age down

through that nation's story there existed in their midst men who were

possessed by a supreme conviction of this presence, and power, and

purpose of God, men who sacrificed bread, profession, home, happiness,

and life itself, that they might seek to carry out that intention and

desire of God. In every age they declared what God wanted Israel to be

and to do. In every age they recommended a policy founded on that

destiny of Israel and that design of God. The darker the national

history grew, the more decided was their certainty of the fulfilment of

God's purpose. But this singular change took place in the form in which

they conceived that fulfilment: In the earlier times Israel—the whole

nation—was to be the minister of God's intention; but as age after age

exhibited the depravity, the unholiness, and the jealousy of the nation,

the thought of the coming kingdom of promise, and of gladness and

goodness, concentrated itself not so much about the people, but about

the King. More and more, it was not the chosen _people_ of Israel, but

it was the chosen _Son_ of Israel, the chosen Heir of David, the coming

Deliverer, the King, that was to bring it in. It is a strange spectacle

to behold how God, by His external dealings with the people of Israel,

and by the development of their conduct, led His servants the prophets

to see that if ever this grand purpose of God for mankind was to be

accomplished, it could not be done by the whole people, or any number of

them, but must be done by one single individual, who should combine in

his character all the goodness, and all the truth, and all the

knowledge, and all the power of God that were necessary to make a

kingdom of God on earth. So it came to pass that inside the progress of

Israel's history, as a wall down the long march of that history, there

was a line of men first of all foreseeing a grand future, mainly

connected with Israel in the government of the nation, and gradually

defining more brightly the covenant, and the establishment, and the

maintenance of that kingdom as contained in the person, in the

character, in the work, in the heart, in the sufferings, in the triumph

of a great coming Messenger of God, a Man of God, a Son of God, yet so

stamped with Divinity that He gets names which set Him on a level with

God. It is the long procession of prophets, the line of foreseers, who,

in succession to the patriarchs, touch, ages in advance, the coming of

Christ, and make the world expect it, and preserve faith in mankind till

Christ does come.

The history of these men within their own nation is striking. As a rule,

they stood in a small minority, were despised and disbelieved, had to

maintain the truth of their Divine conviction in the face of almost

universal denial, were ill-treated and persecuted, were declared to be

impostors or traitors to the national cause, were cast out, and an

immense number of them were killed. But as time rolled on the

development of events proved that those men had seen the calamities and

vengeances of God which had been foretold as about to fall on Israel,

because of Israel's sin. The people were cast out of their own native

land; they were driven into captivity, and in captivity they remembered

what the prophets had spoken; and then, with humble hearts and penitent

spirits, they said to themselves "Those men were right; they spoke true;

they anticipated what has come to pass; God was with them; they were His

messengers; we were in the wrong; it was a true word from heaven that

they uttered amongst us;" and so the old contempt and disbelief vanished

away, and there came a reverence and a faith for those prophets that

almost reached the verge of superstition; they gathered together their

writings; they treasured them, and made the books of those prophets into

their Bible. It is in that fashion that our own Old Testament of the

prophets was formed. The prophets were first rejected, derided, put to

death, and, then with repentance and humility, accepted as the true

messengers of God, taken as authoritative interpreters of God's mind and

will; their writings were treasured and preserved, and made into the

national Bible.

It is these prophets that the Apostle James bids us take as an example.

He means that every Christian man and every Christian woman is, in a

measure, to be a prophet; He means especially that every Christian man

and every Christian woman in the battle of life stands in some measure

between God and others, and is to be a prophet. He means further that

every father is to do for his children what those prophets did for

Israel—he is to make them know God. He means that every mother is to be

the very channel of making her children come into contact with God's

character, and comprehend God's intentions for them. He means especially

that every Sunday-school teacher is to be just what those old prophets

were in Israel—to make others who are more ignorant than he is sensible

of the presence, and purpose, and progression of God's designs through

life in his own present age and time. He means that every preacher, and

every teacher, and every man who speaks about religion is, in his

conduct and character, and what he teaches and what he preaches, to be a

prophet. And above all, he means that one and all of us of this age

shall, even down to the humblest Christian, who hardly has any

influence, act as a mediator or interpreter between other men and God,

as did many of the prophets, with an unswerving belief of the truth, and

with a patience and perseverance of spirit in every unenlightened time,

and amidst the most adverse circumstances, founded upon the certainty of

the fulfilment of God's promise that Christ should come, and shall come

again.

Now I want to say a few things to you about the character and the office

of those prophets in the world, that we may see some respects in which

we may and certainly ought to imitate them. What was a prophet? I

imagine that many of us are content with a very superficial notion of

the part played in actual life by those men. I imagine, because of the

class of books that has been written in great profusion in our present

century, and is still written, that we are apt to think of a prophet

simply and only as a man who predicted things that were going to

happen—incidents and events that were to fall out in the unfolding of

history. The prophets did a vast deal more than that, and the very

essence, and life, and grandeur of their character and conduct appear

only in a small fragment in that portion of their office. Their real

movement and meaning are in quite another department.

If we wish to know what a prophet is, we may, first of all, take the

names given to the prophets in the Bible. Then, again, we may remember

who were the prophets. And then we may take their writings, the records

of their deeds, the history that tells of their fortunes. What are the

names given to a prophet in the Old Testament? The first and holiest is

"a man of God"—"the man of God." All that that tells us is that in a

peculiar sense the prophet belonged to God. The next name is "the

servant of God." That tells us that he belonged to God in the sense of

serving God, doing things for God. Then he is called "the ambassador, or

the messenger, of God." That tells you that he served God by bringing

messages from God. Then he is called an interpreter. That tells you that

it was to men he took God's message, and that he had to make it

understood by them. The next thing that we come to is a "seer,"

connected with the word "watchman," a spier or seer. It means one who

saw what other men could not see, who saw into God's mind, who saw God,

who saw what God was about. It tells us how he got to know his message,

how he learnt it; it was by insight, seeing into the hidden, underlying

purposes of God. Then the last name of all is what we translate

"prophet," and it literally means a man who bubbles up and runs over,

whose heart gushes out, in the sense of being poured into, that what is

poured in comes out of him. It tells us that he pours out what he has

learnt, to other men; and it adds this shade of meaning (the very form

of the Hebrew word does so), that he is, as it were, spoken through; it

does not end with himself, nor does it take its rise with himself, but

it comes into him like a flood, and it overflows; he cannot help

himself; he is possessed, he is pressed; he is compelled to utter what

his God tells him.

The names of a prophet, therefore, tell us this; this is his function;

he, beyond other men, has to do with God, belongs to God; he belongs to

God in being God's servant; he is God's servant in being God's

messenger; he is God's messenger in bringing things to men that God

wants men to know; he learns what he has to tell men by seeing it

himself, by knowing it, understanding it, feeling it, and then he utters

it by a resistless compulsion and impulse, the fire burning in his

heart, a pressure being put on him to tell what God has taught him.

Already you have got the thought of a man with a grandeur, a greatness,

a significance, and a meaning immensely above what you think of when you

think of a man who can tell you where an axe which has been lost is to

be found, or whether a sick person will die or live, or whether a town

is going to be destroyed or not. What you have is a living, breathing,

warming channel of communication between the great God in heaven and the

human hearts of men on earth.

Then, who were the prophets? Moses was a prophet, the greatest of all

the Old Testament prophets. He was a prophet because of his whole

life work, not because once or twice he predicted a thing which was

going to happen. Because he was Moses, the moulder and the maker of

Israel, and the giver to them of all their knowledge about God which is

contained in God's law, therefore Moses was a prophet. Samuel was a

prophet; Saul the king was a prophet for one night, when he lay on the

ground in an ecstasy, and uttered strange sayings. There were all kinds

of prophets; I cannot deal with them all. Isaiah was a prophet; Daniel

was a prophet supremely. Christ was _the_ Prophet, and the complete

Prophet. How? Because He foretold the doom of Jerusalem? Because He

foretold His own death? Undoubtedly because He did those things; but

that was not why He was called the Prophet. Why was it? A very excellent

book, the Shorter Catechism, puts it better than I can: "Jesus Christ is

a Prophet in making known to us the mind and will of God for our

salvation."

I put this deliberately and very strongly, almost unduly depreciating

the idea of foretelling future events, just because I know from my own

experience, and certainly from the experience of others, that one thinks

that the latter is the whole meaning of the word. It is startling and

intensely interesting when you can pick out a prediction which was

uttered ages before, and which was afterwards fulfilled. By all means

take that; but never forget that, just like Christ's miracles, it was,

as it were, only the accompaniment of the prophet's main work as a

prophet, and that the real work of a prophet is making known unto us the

whole character, and heart, and mind, and will of God, as these are

revealed in working out the world's salvation.

If you turn to the writings of the prophets in the Old Testament you

instantly discover that that is the true idea of a prophet. Take Isaiah,

take Micah, take Jeremiah, take any prophet you please; every here and

there you come upon a prediction—"Babylon shall be destroyed;" "Nineveh

shall be destroyed." Yes, but it is one prediction, as an impassioned

declaration of God's ways to men, showing how He must punish their

wickedness, and must visit the impenitent. But the story of God's

character and dealings for the world's redemption is, after all, the

grand substance of Old Testament prophecy; it is a record of God's pity

for mankind, and His determination to make them holy and happy, and of

the fact that it is all to be done by the great coming Christ, the

world's Sacrifice and the world's Saviour.

And when you are told to take the prophets as your example do not go

away saying, "I cannot predict future events, and astonish people, and

make them feel that I have some supernatural power." No, they could not

be _that_ example to you. A prophet was a man who knew the character of

the true and living God; and because he knew and loved Him, and was

living with Him, he made other men know Him, and feel Him, and

understand Him too.

I have no time to enter into all the questions concerning the precise

manner in which the prophet got to know God's mind and will—by dream, in

ecstasy, in lofty rapt thought, in wonderful insight into the Spirit of

God, and sometimes by a vision like that of Isaiah, where he "saw the

Lord, high and lifted up," on His throne. Or, the prophet got to know

God in a similar way to that which we read of in the case of the child

Samuel, when the voice of God in the lonely Temple struck upon the

child's ear so that there was nothing startling, and he thought it was

his master's voice calling him; but he lived to see the terrible

fulfilment of the first teaching which God gave to the child, in that

which befell the master. I have no time to go into all that, nor to

enter largely into the place and purpose of the prophets in working out

that history which shows, when properly understood, nothing else but the

growth of the Spirit of Jesus Christ through the ages, till that Spirit

came in its completion in Jesus the Son of Mary; for _there_ is the

whole meaning of the prophets in Israel; they were an incarnation of the

very same heart, and mind, and will of the Divine dispensation and of

God for the world's redemption which were in Jesus; it was the Spirit of

Jesus. And do not put away the words as a mere figure unless you put

away the words as a mere figure when you read that Jesus was the

incarnate Son of God. It was the very Spirit of God. The same Spirit as

was consummate in Jesus, the perfect Prophet because the perfect

Revelation of God, in its measure was present in every prophet who made

the people believe God as they had never done before, and recognise His

presence in the history of their time. The prophets taught them to

repent of their sin, to live for God, to take their share in the great

conflicts for righteousness that God was fighting in their age. In a

measure the Spirit of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Saviour of the

world, was present in every age of it. There is scarcely any occurrence,

any story, any Psalm, in the prophecies of the Old Testament, which has

not an application to Jesus Christ, and a meaning showing that He is in

it. It is made a specimen, as it were, of all that is practically to be

found in Him. The history of Israel in prophecy, which was the rising

and the beginning of the future history of Israel, was just the growing

of Jesus through the ages, till at length He culminated in the Son of

Mary.

I want to-day rather to tell you some of the qualifications of a

prophet—some of the elements of character that a man must have if he is

to play the part of a prophet to the people he lives among, bidding

myself and you take the prophets as an example. One thing is

remarkable—the office of a prophet was not hereditary. The great

departments of God's government, and teaching, and dealings with Israel

were the kingship, the priesthood, and the prophethood—the rule, the

fellowship, and the teaching and guidance. Now, all these culminated in

Jesus; He is Prophet, Priest, and King. In Israel no mere man or body of

men was fit in unity to fill those offices; they were distributed. The

burden was too great, the power was too grand, for any single man,

except the perfect Son of Man, to combine them in their fulness, and so

they were divided in Israel, to be reunited in the perfect embodiment of

Israel, God, Prophet, Priest, and King to the people. God's meaning was

that all Israel in its completeness should be king, and prophet, and

priest, without any active, separated, divided government; that it

should be a theocracy, as God's kingdom, ruling themselves, every one of

them being a king to God, every one of them being a priest, every one of

them being able to come direct to God for himself, and to bring his

prayers to God without any intervention of man; in the same way every

man, as a prophet, hearing God's voice direct to his heart, and being

taught the truth that God revealed. God wanted them all to be prophets;

God wanted them all to be priests; God wanted them all to be kings: but

they were not fit for it, and so among them special men had to be

cultivated to fill those offices. Now, there is this distinction between

those divided offices or faculties of God's rule and guidance in Israel:

the kingship was hereditary; the priesthood was hereditary: the

prophethood was never hereditary. A priest's son was born a priest; a

king's son was born a king: a prophet's son was not born a prophet. The

prophets were selected, not born. Why? Because it was the supreme and

grandest office, the most difficult, the most responsible, the most

sacred. Any man was fit to be a priest, to conduct the ritual and

external ordinances of worship, through which men's hearts were brought

to God. And any man, comparatively, might be a king, so long as he

devoted to his office that amount of thought and time which was

necessary. It needed no special moral qualifications and no special

insight. A man was the better who had these, but he could be a good

enough king without them. But a prophet could not be born a prophet; a

prophet had to be chosen, a prophet had to be made by God. And the

reason was this: the prophethood was a creative office and function.

God's dealings with Israel were not done when He had given the ancient

economy of a religious priesthood and kingdom. God had to reshape, and

remodel, and adopt His laws, and teaching, and meaning, and the outward

ordinances of religion to every age. As the nation both externally and

internally altered, new teaching had to come to it at the hands of the

prophets.

Were the priests the channel by which God could do it? Their duty was

fixed, and in the law, as well as in the form of government, men could

not err; they could follow the Divine precepts exactly in administering

them. But when an addition has to be made, and a remoulding to take

place, it wants a man capable of entering with strange, grand insight

into God's purposes, a man with eyes, with soul; it needs a man lifted

up. And so the prophets' office was never hereditary; they were always

selected; God chose them; why? Why did God choose one man, and not

another? I think that He chose a man, first of all, who had a natural

adaptation, who had rare powers of mind, who had rare genius and

sympathetic feeling, and not a mere presentiment of the movements of the

world and its destiny as it went on round about him. I think that, as a

rule, God selected a man with a natural adaptation, and prepared him for

all that he had to do and tell. It transformed a man's life; it took him

clean out of the common world in which men lived. We presume that it was

so from what is recorded, and from the facts which we know concerning

the prophets' characters and lives. God caused something to happen to a

man that made God appear to him what He was not to common men. An awful

vision was presented to Isaiah of the great, grand God, and thenceforth

all earthly considerations were nothing to Isaiah. He had seen _God_,

and the future was God's making. In the face of empires, however mighty

in name and in armies, it is the will of God that settles the future,

and such a man disregards all earthly advantages; he knows that God

means to do His deed; he says, "It shall be done; and if you set

yourselves against it there is no other end than destruction, which is

sure to fall upon you, for God will do the deed which He means to do."

It was a revelation of _God_ which made the man a prophet; it made him a

man who felt God to be supreme; it made him to be certain of God's

sovereignty, and absoluteness, and the goodness of God's authority; so

that nothing could induce him to swerve from the path that God appointed

for him. He was a man who stood like a rock amidst the earthly, selfish,

planning, scheming men of his time, and declared the future truly,

because he had seen God's meaning, and held men to it; and when they

would not be so held he was content to die, declaring the truth of his

message, and looking forward to the time when the future would manifest

its truth. He was a fit prophet, a living teacher, who spoke of the

future—a grand man, with a grand office and a grand destiny to play in

the world.

The man, the father, the mother, the teacher, the preacher, who takes

the prophets as examples, who will play his destined part in his own

little home, in his own Sunday-school class, in his own congregation, in

his own neighbourhood, in the great world round about him, must be a

prophet; he must be a man who knows God; he must be a man who feels God

to be all about him; he must be a man who is not merely orthodox in

theology, and believes all that is written about God's dealings in the

past; but he must be a man that will make you know that God is living,

and moving, and loving in the events of his own time; he must be a man

who recognises God in the providences of his own life; he must be a man

who does not shape his conduct for earthly gain or for social advantage;

he must be a man despising all these things, and paying heed to his own

high destiny, yet whose character and conduct move on the lines which I

have indicated; who says, "God is making me great, but He bids me live

as He lives—but He bids me sacrifice friends and home; I _must_ do it; I

_must_ tell this truth, though all good men should be against me, for I

have learnt it of God, at my risk of having mistaken its meaning; yet I

must speak it." Ay, even if such a man makes mistakes in learning this

new lesson of God, and does not read it quite right, even if he goes

wrong, nevertheless he has life in him, Divine life; he has honesty; he

is a true man; he is a man who is not of the world; he is a man who is

not a mere ecclesiastic; he is a man who is not a mere self-seeker. That

man does God's work on earth. And I venture to say that in the Church's

story you will find that there has been a succession of men who have

done what was the work of the priest in the old time, and there has been

a succession of men who have done the work of the prophet. You need

both; you need the priest, to keep alive, as it were, the ordinary level

of religion, to preserve some sort of uniformity; and in the Church's

story you will find that God has raised up prophets, men who sometimes

broke loose, who were not always true, who sometimes mistook God's

meaning, who had but little of the character of the old prophets, and

yet who taught truth, and adapted the old ecclesiastical doctrines to

the new necessities, suiting their work to the age; and though

disbelieved and openly denounced in their own day, they have become our

teachers since. What of the Reformers? what of Wesley? what of

Whitefield? what of many another name, much nearer our own time, but

which does not diminish the effect of the general principle? Ay, and

what of men not so good and great as these, but who had life in them;

who broke up the stagnation of ecclesiastical life, and brought new

faith to men; who by their dazzling earnestness, and spiritual insight,

and their teaching brought up the ordinary level of God's presence?

Thank God it is so. It is the lot of the human prophet and priest, and

of similar teachers, in our day, to make men know that there is a God,

and a Christ, and a soul to be saved, and that they are men, and not

mere machines. Thank God for it; but pray God to make you and me true

prophets; pray God to give us the passion of prophets, to give us

sympathy with all the wants of the age, to give us to know that He is

moving, to give us to know what new teachings come from Him; pray God to

give us generosity, and self-sacrifice, and liberality, and largeness of

heart, with our means, with our abilities, with our whole soul, with our

prayers and spirits, and all that we have, to play our part as faithful

prophets in the world's story, showing men God, and winning them to

follow Him.