_THE DARK ENIGMA OF DEATH._
ST. JOHN xi.
This morning I ask your attention to the story that has been read in the
eleventh chapter of the Gospel of St. John.
The rulers of the Jews at Jerusalem had resolved on Christ's death, and
the mass of the people sympathised with them. The Master's life had been
threatened by a popular outburst. His work on earth was not yet done,
and so He withdrew into the country, to escape from the violence and
danger of Jerusalem. He went away to the Jordan, to the point, not very
far from Jerusalem, where John first began baptizing, and there He
remained in comparative seclusion. But people knew where He was.
Probably people in the surrounding districts gathered together to hear
Him teach; and possibly, as a very ingenious commentator has suggested,
Christ, reaping the harvest of John's prolonged teaching in this
district, succeeded in winning the faith of a great many of his hearers;
and so He was busy doing good and happy work, building up His kingdom on
the banks of the Jordan.
Meanwhile, sickness came to the home at Bethany, where most He felt
Himself at home during His wanderings in this world of ours. Lazarus was
stricken with a very dangerous illness, grew worse and worse, and at
last all hope was gone. Now, I should fancy that from the very first day
that it became evident that their brother was seriously ill, the hearts
of Mary and Martha longed to have Jesus come to them, if it was only to
be with them in their anxiety, and suspense, and watching. And the heart
of the sick man must have longed for that great Divine Friend of his to
be by his sick bed. Why did they not send for Him at once? I think there
is a very simple reason. They were not selfish, as we sometimes tend to
be in our sickness or in our sorrow. They thought about others as well
as about themselves. They remembered that for Jesus to come back to the
vicinity of Jerusalem was to risk His own life, and not even for the
safety of their brother could they bring themselves for a long time to
ask the beloved Master to run such a risk as that, and so they delayed
really till too late. In the extremity of their grief and despair they
sent a messenger to Jesus—not to ask Him to come: there, again, I read
that that was their meaning—they would not take it on themselves to ask
Him to imperil His life, but they could not resist just letting Him know
that their brother, whom Jesus so loved, was very sick. It is
exceedingly touching, that simple message, "Lord, behold, he whom Thou
lovest is sick." And they knew that it would say to Jesus, "Thou knowest
how much we would like Thee to come and recover him, and Thou knowest,
too, the last thing we would ask of Thee would be, out of favour and
kindness to us, to risk that life on which so much hangs—the kingdom of
God upon earth."
There was real danger in Christ's return to Jerusalem. He was conscious
of it, for you find that when He did make His way to Bethany He seems to
have taken care, as far as possible, to conceal the fact from the
inhabitants of Jerusalem. He came very quietly. He did not at first
enter into Bethany. He remained outside the precincts of the village. He
sent word secretly to Martha, so that not even Mary or the other persons
that were with them in the house knew of the fact. And then, again, He
sent Martha back, or Martha went back, to Mary, and, with somewhat
studied concealment, warned her of the Master's vicinity, so that when
she went out those who were with her fancied she was going to the grave.
I point all that out to you in order that you may see that it is not a
mere imagination or fancy, but that one of the great elements in
determining the conduct of the family at Bethany, and the action of
Christ, was that real hazard of His life, which He dared not needlessly
risk in perils at this time, since His time of toil on earth, His
daylight of labour, was not yet over and done.
When Jesus received the message He behaved in a seemingly strange
fashion. Apparently He just did nothing, but went on with His teaching
and preaching for two long days. Did He think how often anxious faces
would be at the door of that house in Bethany, peering along the road
that led to the home, looking for the figure that had so often trodden
that way, because His heart drew Him to that happy family circle? Did
Jesus know that Lazarus was dying? Did Jesus think that the hearts of
Mary and Martha were breaking? Oh, He had the most loving heart that
ever man had on earth, and yet He delayed two days before He set out for
that home of distress. Now, that fact is often presented in a somewhat
revolting fashion, and I think it is worth while just to diverge from my
main theme to remove the effect of such presentation if it weighs with
any of you. It is said that Jesus deliberately hung back for two days in
order to let Lazarus die. That is a mistake—a total mistake. Lazarus had
been already buried four days before Christ arrived. Now, suppose He had
lost no time; suppose He had set out at once, He would only have reached
Bethany two days earlier, and so, you see, Lazarus would have then
already been buried two days. The real fact is just this, that the
message was sent too late, and the sick man had died; and even if Christ
had gone at once, all the same He would have found him in the grave. But
none the less the story is so told as to shut us up to this conviction,
that it was planned, and purposed, and accepted in the will of God, and
in the will of Jesus, that Lazarus should be sick, and grow worse and
worse, and should sink and fail, and die and be buried. Indubitably
Jesus, with His knowledge, could, of His own action, have returned
earlier to have intervened and prevented the sickness ending fatally. He
was absent that Lazarus might die. When He spoke of the thing He told
His disciples, first of all, the perfect, complete truth. "This," said
Jesus, "is not to end in death's darkness. Its real goal and termination
is to be the glory of God, revealed in the glory of his Son, the Christ
on earth." That is the end of it; nevertheless, Lazarus must die. God's
glory is to find its consummation, not in rescuing Lazarus from the
grave, but in restoring him from death, and bringing him back into life.
It was part of the material Christ used in building up His kingdom—the
sickness and the death of Lazarus. He did delay, not in that seeming
revolting, cold-blooded fashion in which it is often portrayed. He did
deliberately hold His hand and delay; ay, and He held His loving human
heart too, and He let his friend sicken, and suffer pain, and die, and
He let the hearts of those two women that loved Him well-nigh break. He
did it.
Can we justify Him? Did the sisters divine truly when they sent that
message, "He whom Thou lovest is sick"? If He loved him, why did He
prolong the agony? Why did He not intervene? Why did He not at once
cancel death? Why those terrible four days of mourning, and gloom, and
darkness, and doubt? Now that is precisely the painful position of all
of us in this world of sin, and pain, and sickness, and parting, and
death. We think a good God made our world; we think a loving Father
holds our lives in His hands; and then we turn and look at this world,
we look at the terrible strifes and struggles, we look at the great
entail of sin that lies on our race, we see the ravages of disease, and
disaster, and violence, and cruelty, and see everywhere the last black
enigma of death and the grave, and this in spite of all our Christian
faith, learnt from the Bible; ay, learnt from God's Spirit speaking
often in the instincts of our heart and nature—we, too, are forced to
ask the question, "Lord, why art Thou not here? Why does our brother
die? If Thou wert here Thou couldest save him. Dost Thou love him? and
if Thou lovest, why are we sick? Why do we die?"
The inmates of that house at Bethany had received Jesus with a rare
degree of sympathetic feeling and heartfelt welcome. They entered into
the meaning of His teaching and preaching with a degree of fellowship
and quick response that moved His heart and soul even beyond the best of
His disciples. One of them at least—Mary, and almost certainly Lazarus
too—had come very near to that Divine Lord, in full understanding of all
His grandeur, His sinlessness, His mighty love Though yet all ignorant
of a great deal about His person, and about the fashion in which He was
to make His kingdom, with a genuine purity and ardour of attachment and
affection, they worshipped Him, they recognised the Divine within Him,
they hailed Him as the world's Christ and Saviour. Listen to Martha's
cry in her perplexity: "I cannot understand it all, but I know Thou art
the Christ come from God, the world's King, the world's Saviour. That I
know, that I hold to." It was that understanding, that sympathy in that
home, that made it so sweet a place of rest to Jesus. More than
that—manifestly the two sisters and brother lived a life of sweet human
affection. There was an atmosphere of tender love in their home, broken
by little storms of misunderstanding, as may be in the very best of our
imperfect human homes, but in reality a great depth of tenderness, and
clinging attachment, and loyal love to one another, bound the household
together. Oh, thank God for every such home on earth! That is the real
bulwark against all pessimism, the charter of our eternal birthrights.
Given the grandeur, the reality of human love, as, thank God, most of us
know it in our homes, that is the absolute guarantee that it came from
the creating hands of grander Love Divine.
Jesus was not merely loved by the family where He came to spend the
nights when He was working in Jerusalem, but He got to love them with a
very wonderful tenderness. You remember that chivalrous, impassioned
defence of Mary, when she was assailed by the coarse attacks of the
disciples. You catch it, too, in that message sent to Him—"He whom Thou
lovest." Ah, many an act of affection, many a look that was a caress,
many an appeal for sympathy that bespoke brotherhood, had passed between
Jesus of Nazareth and that Lazarus, else the sisters would not have
thought of saying, "He whom Thou lovest is sick."
And yet into that home so dear to the heart of Jesus, the Son of God,
into that home that had for its Friend the Man that was master of life
and of death, of calamity and prosperity, of all earthly powers and
forces, into that home there penetrated cruel, painful, deadly sickness.
The man Jesus loved lay there on his bed dying.
Now, I emphasize that, because there used to be a great deal of thinking
about God's relation to those that love Him and whom He loves—a great
deal of teaching in the Christian Church that counted itself most
orthodox, and which was, indeed, deadly heresy, coarse, materialistic,
despicable, misunderstanding the ideal grandeur of the Bible promises.
Some of you know the sort of teaching that used to prevail—the idea that
God's saints should be exceptionally favoured; the sun would shine on
their plot of corn, and it would not shine on the plot of corn of the
bad man; their ships would not sink at sea, their children would not
catch infectious diseases; God would pamper them, exempt them from
bearing their part in the world's great battle, with hardness and toil
of labour, with struggle, and attainment, and achievement. It came of a
very despicable conception of what a father can do for a child, as if
the best thing for a father to do for his son was to pet and indulge
him, and save him all bodily struggle and all difficulties, instead of
giving him a life of discipline. As if a general in the army would,
because of his faltering heart, refuse to let his son take the post of
danger; as if he would not rather wish for that son—ay, with a great
pang in his own soul—that he should be the bravest, the most daring, the
one most exposed to the deadliest hazard.
Ah, we have got to recognise that we whom God loves may be sick and
dying, and yet God does love us. Lazarus was loved by Jesus, yet he whom
Jesus loved was sick and dying. Ah, and there is a still more poisonous
difficulty in that materialistic, that worldly way of looking at God's
love; that horrible, revolting misjudgment that Christ condemned,
crushed with indignation when it confronted Him. "The men on whom the
tower of Siloam fell must have been sinners worse than us on whom it did
not fall." Never, never! The great government of the world is not made
up of patches and strokes of anger and outbursts of weak indulgence. The
world is God's great workshop, God's great battle-field. These have
their places. Here a storm of bullets falls, and brave and good men as
well as cowards fall before it. You mistake if you try to forestall
God's judgments, God's verdicts on the last great day of reckoning.
Still we have got the fact that Christ does not interpose to prevent
death, that Christ does not hinder those dearest to Him from bearing
their share of life's sicknesses and sufferings, that God Himself
suffers death to go on, apparently wielding an undisputed sway over
human existence.
What is the consequence of it? Well, the first consequences seem to be
all evil. You might look on the surface of life, and when you read
superficially the narrative of this chapter in St. John, it looks as if
mischief and evil came of the strange delay of God and of His Christ.
Look at the effect upon the disciples. Now here there is not enough told
to justify me in putting more positively to you the picture of their
inner hearts, but I am going to present—I dread that I may be guilty of
a want of charity, at all events of disproportion—but as I read this
chapter, and try to think myself into it, this is the conception I have:
Had these men known that Lazarus was very sick, they would not have
wished their Master to go back to try and save him. They were selfish
enough to have been rather glad that He was at a distance, to wish that
He should not know. When the message did come I think they were puzzled
and perplexed. Selfishly, they were rather pleased that He did not set
off to go. But, on the other hand—for, mind you, a selfish man
understands the dictates of love—they said to themselves, "It is not
quite like Him. Well, it is wise, it is prudent not to go, but it is a
little cowardly. Does He love Lazarus so much as we used to think?" Oh,
if I am right, what a painful thing, all these bad, poor, selfish
thoughts of the Divine heart in Jesus! all created, mark you, because
Jesus suffered the man whom He loved to be sick, and at last to die, and
did not go and check death, and drive the dark King of Terrors back.
Then Jesus says to them that He has resolved to go and visit Lazarus. It
is here I get the ground on which I stand in forecasting that
selfishness in them. Then they thought He was wrong. They did venture to
blurt out what was a censure: "He will go; He ought not to do it. What
are we to do who see with clearer eyes the pathway of prudence? To let
Him go and die? It was a total blunder, a mistake, but all the same we
cannot let Him go and die alone. Let us go and die with Him."
Oh, what a dearth of understanding of their Master, His love, His power,
His real character, created by the enigma of Christ's conduct, that He
had held His hand, that He had suffered His friend to be sick, that He
had permitted him to die!
Then come to the two sisters. Ah, what a struggle must have gone on in
their hearts, as hour after hour passed after the point had come when
Jesus should have been with them if He had listened to their message, if
He pitied their brother, His own beloved friend. What could the Master
mean? Did something hinder Him and prevent His coming? or was it the
danger to His life? Was there a little selfishness? or had they any
right to expect it? Either He is lacking in love, or else He is lacking
in power. What could it mean? And then, when at last the poor sick eyes
shut and their brother lay there dead, their hearts were like stones
within them. And the burial, following swiftly after in the East,
because decay begins so quickly there; and then the mourning and the
hired mourners, professional mourners, all around them, and these poor
women there saying in their hearts, "Surely, surely it need not have
been; certainly if the Master, who healed so many sick, had been here,
if He had come, if He knew, if He had been here all this horror, this
agony, this pain, might have been escaped."
So when Jesus did come, look at them, how they met Him. Martha goes away
out, and the first thing she says is just what they had said so often to
one another and to their own hearts: "O Master, if Thou hadst only been
here our brother had not died." And then the spirit of the woman told
her that perhaps she had hurt Jesus' feelings, that perhaps He was not
to blame, that perhaps there was some explanation, though she could not
see it, and so, in her blundering way—for she had not the fine tact that
was in Mary—she tried to mend it, and only made it worse by volunteering
that she did believe in Him after all.
The soul of Christ felt the intended love, and shuddered at that
tremendous distance of sympathy and understanding. "You believe in Me."
He could not hold it in. "Thy brother shall rise again." And poor Martha
was unable to rise to the height of Christ's meaning. "Oh, yes, Lord, I
know, at the great resurrection. Yes, he will rise again." Then comes
Jesus' declaration, "I am the Resurrection and the Life. The man that
lives in Me, in whom I live, has in Me a deathless life. I am here
to-day to prove that." That was what He meant, but He was far away above
her. The poor heart in her had lost Him. She was dazed, and so she just
fell back upon the one thing that she was quite sure of, even if He had
not been quite kind to her, or even if His power was limited. "Yes, yes,
Master, I know Thou art the Christ, the Son of God, come into this world
to be its Saviour and its King." And then, perhaps, with a sort of sense
that Mary could understand the Master better, could read His meaning and
tell it to her, she slipped away, and she found her sister, and
whispered in her ear, "The Master is come, and asks for thee." Then Mary
went away to meet Him too.
It is much harder to read what was in that sweet heart of Mary. I have
no doubt that she, too, had fought a battle with doubt. The story seems
to show that she had attained to greater faith than Martha. She had been
pained, but still there was a divining instinct in her, like the
divining instinct that warned her, when all the disciples were blind to
it, that He was going to die, and she went and anointed Him to His
burial; a divining instinct in her that somehow the cloud was going to
be rolled away. And she went out and said simply, "Lord, if Thou hadst
been here our brother had not died." And then she was too wise to say
one word more. With her finer tact, with her deeper understanding, she
knew that was all she should say. But it was like saying, "There is
perplexity in this visitation, in Thy delay, in my brother's death; Thou
couldst have made it different if Thou hadst seen it well to be here. I
cannot understand the right and the love of it." It was a question. It
did say, "Master, what art Thou going to do?" And Christ felt it was. As
she broke out and burst into tears, He lost control and wept with her.
But there were others—the Jews, the enemies of Christ; men who hated
Him, men who disbelieved in Him, men who grudged Him all His glory and
the love He had won on the earth. They had hurried out—some of them with
a degree of human compassion—to that home of bereavement. It was known
as the home of Christ, and I think some of them had come with greater
pleasure that Lazarus had died. What they said when they saw Him weep
betrays their mood. "This is He who professed to be able to open the
eyes of the blind and heal all sicknesses. How, then, is it that He
allows His dearest friend on earth to be sick, and die, and be buried?
He has lost His power, if He ever had it." They were rejoicing over His
seeming defeat. They had no love for Him, and so had no faith in Him.
Is not that true of our world to-day? The best of you, Christians, when
death comes to your own homes, do you manage to sing the songs of
triumph right away? Well, you are very wonderful saints if you do. If
you do not, perhaps you say, "If God is in this world, how comes that
dark enigma of death?"
And others of you grip hold of your faith, but yet your heart cries out
against it. You believe that God is good, but has He been quite good to
you? Like Martha, you feel as if you had some doubt; you feel bound in
your prayers; you say, "O God, I do not mean to reproach Thee;" weak,
sinful if you will, yet the sign of a true follower of the Christ.
And then the enemies of Christ, the worldlings all about in this earth
of ours, as they look upon death's ravages, they are saying, "If there
were a God, if there were a Father, if there were a great heart that
could love, why does not He show it?" Now, I said to you that at first
it looks as if nothing but evil came of God's delay to interpose against
death; but when you look a little deeper I think you begin to discover
an infinitely greater good and benefit come out of that evil.
I must very briefly, very rapidly, trace to you in the story, and you
can parallel it in the life of yourselves, that discipline of goodness
there is in God's refraining from checking sickness and death. Christ
said, the end of it is first of all death, but that is not the
termination. Through death this sickness, this struggle of doubt and
faith, should end in the glory of God. He meant this: In the preparation
of His life and His death the death and resurrection of Lazarus held a
central position. It was the turning-point, the thing that determined
His crucifixion on Calvary. That tremendous miracle compelled the rulers
of Jerusalem to resolve on and carry out His death. That miracle of
Lazarus' resurrection gave to the faith of the disciples and of Christ's
followers a strength of clinging attachment that carried them through
the eclipse of their belief when they saw Him die on Calvary.
Now, what would you say? Was it cruel of Christ to allow His friend
Lazarus, His dear friends Mary and Martha, to go through that period of
suspense, of anxiety, of sickness, of death, and of the grave, that they
might do one of the great deeds in bringing in the world's Redeemer? Oh,
men and women, if God be wise, and if God be great, then must it not be
that somehow or other the structure of this world is the best for God's
end, and our tears, and partings, and calamities but incidents in the
grand campaign that shall end in the resplendent glory of heaven? Yes,
for the glory of God, and for the sake of others, for the sake of the
disciples, for the sake of the world, says Christ, I have suffered My
friend Lazarus to die.
"Ah," you say, "you have still got to show God's goodness and kindness
to me individually. My death may be for God's glory, it may be for the
good of others; but how about me and those who mourn?" Well, now, look
at it. You must get to the end of the story before you venture to judge
the measure, the worth, of God's goodness. After all, was that period of
sickness and death unmitigated gloom, and horror, and agony? Oh, I put
it to you, men and women, who have passed through it, watching by the
death of dear father or mother that loved the Lord and loved you, and
whom you loved—dark, and sore, and painful enough at the time; but oh,
if I called you to speak out, would you not say it was one of the most
sacred periods of your life—the unspeakable tenderness, the sweet
clinging love, the untiring service, the grateful responses, the
sacredness that came into life? Ay, and when the tie was snapped, the
new tenderness that you gave to the friends that are left, the new
pledge binding you to heaven, and to hope for it, and long for it—death
is not all an evil to our eyes. Death cannot ultimately be an evil,
since it is universal—the consummation, climax, crown of every human
life. Ah, if we had the grander majesty of soul to look at it from God's
altitude, we should call death, not a defeat, but a victory, a triumph.
I think sometimes that if death did not end these lives of ours, how
weary they would get. Think of it—to live on for ever in the sordidness,
in the littleness, in the struggle, the pain, the sin of this life of
ours. Oh, we need that angel of death to come in, and now and then stir
the pool of our family life, that there may be healing in it, that there
may be blessing in it! Death, holding the hand of God through it, to
those that stand by and see the sweetness of human love, the triumph of
faith celestial, has a grandeur in it, like Christ's death on the cross;
it hides out of sight of the people the ghastly, the doubt-creating
features and elements of its external impediment—death becomes God's
minister. It is going home to one's Father.
Yes, but you want the guarantee that death is not the end, and that day
it was right and lawful for Christ to give it, to anticipate the last
great day, when in one unbroken army, radiant and resplendent, shining
like jewels in a crown, He shall bring from the dark grave all that
loved Him, fought for Him, and were loyal to Him on the road, and went
down into the dark waters singly, one by one, in circumstances of
ignominy often, and yet dying with Christ within them, the Resurrection
and the Life.
Ah, that great, grand vindication of God, and interpretation of this
world's enigma was made clear that day when Christ called Lazarus back,
and gave him alive to his sisters in the sight of His doubting
disciples, in the sight of those sneering enemies. And what I like to
think as best of all and most comforting of all is this, that Christ did
that deed of love and goodness to hearts that so misunderstood Him, were
so ignorant of His glory, denied and disbelieved so much of His claims,
were then and there so despairing, so hopeless, that perhaps it was only
in one heart, the heart of Mary, there was hope or faith like a grain of
mustard-seed. Yet He did it. Why? He whom He loved died, and they whom
He loved mourned. It was not that they loved Him; it was that He loved
them.
Ah, when I read sneers at the simple Evangelical Gospel that says, "Put
away all thoughts of earning heaven; your good works are rags"—true
enough, true enough—the sneers are mistaken. It is a very grand Gospel
that, for what it says is this, "There is hope, salvation from sin, life
eternal, for you and for me, not for anything in us, nor for anything we
can do, even if we did the best we could. We hold the hope and
confidence of redemption, resurrection, in our hearts, because the God
that made us loves us;" and so—as I read lately in a recently published
book, amid much that I think is foolish, what yet struck me as
singularly tender and true—"When in the hour of death we cry, 'Good
Lord, deliver us,' we might stop and leave out the 'deliver us.' It is
quite enough if we are dying in the arms of a God that is good."