CHAPTER XXVII

The Secret Traffic

"Sir, to leave things out of a book because they

will not be believed, is meanness."--DR. JOHNSON.

WHEN first, upon March 7, 1901, we heard from the lips of a little child

the story of her life in a Temple house, we were startled and

distressed, and penetrated with the conviction that such a story ought

to be impossible in a land ruled by a Christian Power. The subject was

new to us; we knew nothing of the magnitude of what may be called "The

Secret Traffic of India"--a traffic in little children, mere infants

oftentimes, for wrong purposes; and we did not appreciate, as we do now,

the delicacy and difficulty of the position from a Government point of

view, or the quiet might of the forces upon the other side. And though

with added knowledge comes an added sense of responsibility, and a fear

of all careless appeal to those whose burden is already so heavy, yet

with every fresh discovery the conviction deepens that something should

be done--and done, if possible, soon--to save at least this generation

of children, or some of them, from destruction.

"It is useless to move without a body of evidence at your back," said a

friend in the Civil Service to us at the close of a long conversation.

"If you can get the children, of course they themselves will furnish the

best evidence; but, anyhow, collect facts." And this was the beginning

of a Note-book, into which we entered whatever we could learn about the

Temple children, and in which we kept letters relating to them.

By Temple children throughout this book we mean children dedicated to

gods, or in danger of being so dedicated. Dedication to gods implies a

form of marriage which makes ordinary marriage impossible. The child is

regarded as belonging to the gods. In Southern India, where religious

feeling runs strong, and the great Temples are the centres of Hindu

influence, this that I have called "The Traffic" is worked upon

religious lines; and so in trying to save the children we have to

contend with the perverted religious sense. Something of the same kind

exists in other parts of India, and the traffic under another name is

common in provinces where Temple service as we have it in the South is

unknown. Again, in areas where, owing to the action of the native

Government, Temple service, as such, is not recognised, so that children

in danger of wrong cannot, strictly speaking, be called Temple children,

there is yet need of legislation which shall touch all houses where

little children are being brought up for the same purpose; so that the

subject is immense and involved, and the thought of it suggests a net

thrown over millions of square miles of territory, so finely woven as to

be almost invisible, but so strong in its mesh that in no place yet has

it ever given way. And the net is alive: it can feel and it can hold.

But all through this book we have kept to the South--to the area where

the evil is distinctly and recognisably religious. Others elsewhere have

told their own story; ours, though in touch with theirs (in that its

whole motive is to save the little children), is yet different in

manner, in that it is avowedly Christian. India is a land where

generalisations are deceptive. So we have kept to the South.

We ourselves became only very gradually aware of what was happening

about us. As fact after fact came to light, we were forced to certain

conclusions which we could not doubt were correct. But at first we were

almost alone in these conclusions, because it was impossible to take

others with us in our tedious underground hunt after facts. So the

question was often asked: "But do the children really exist?"

I have said we were almost alone, not quite. Members of the Indian Civil

Service, who are much among the people, knew something of the custom of

child-dedication, but found themselves unable to touch it. Hindu

Reformers, of course, knew; and two or three veteran missionaries had

come into contact with it and had grieved over their helplessness to do

anything. One of these had written a pamphlet on the subject twenty

years before our Nursery work began. He sent it to me with a sorrowful

word written across it, "Result? Nil." But we do not often meet our

civilian friends, for they are busy, and so are we; and the few

missionaries whose inspiring sympathy helped us through those earlier

years were in places far from us, and so were all the Reformers. So

perhaps it was not wonderful that, beset by doubting letters from home

and a certain amount of not unnatural incredulity in India, we sometimes

almost wondered if we ourselves were dreaming. "Well, if they do exist,

I hope you will be able to find them!"--varied by, "Well, if you do find

them, they will be a proof of their own existence!"--were two of the

most encouraging remarks of those early days.

From the beginning of this work, as stated before, we have tried to

collect facts about the traffic and the customs connected with it. Notes

were kept of conversations with Hindus and others, and these notes were

compared with what evidence we were able to gather from trustworthy

sources. These brief notes of various kinds we offer in their

simplicity. We have made no attempt to tabulate or put into shape the

information thus acquired, believing that the notes of conversations

taken down at the time, and the quotations from letters copied as they

stand, will do their work more directly than anything more elaborate

would. Where there is a difference of detail it is because the customs

differ slightly in different places. No names are given, for obvious

reasons; but the letters were written by men of standing, living in

widely scattered districts in the South. The evidence contained in them

was carefully sifted, and in many cases corroborated by personal

investigation, before being considered evidence: so that we believe

these chapters may be accepted as fact. Dated quotations from the

_Madras Mail_ are sufficient to prove that we are not writing ancient

history:--

_January 2, 1909._--"The following resolution was put from the chair and

carried unanimously: 'The Conference (consisting of Hindu Social

Reformers) cordially supports the movement started to better the

condition of unprotected children in general, and appreciates

particularly the agitation started to protect girls and young women from

being dedicated to Temples.'"

_May 8, 1909._--"Once more we have an illustration from Mysore of the

fact that the Government of a Native State are able to tread boldly on

ground which the British Government in India are unable to approach. At

various times, in these columns and elsewhere, has the cry raised

against the employment of servants of the gods in Hindu Temples been

uttered; but, as far as the Government are concerned, it has fallen, if

not on deaf ears, on ears stopped to appeals of this kind, which demand

action that can be interpreted as a breach of that religious neutrality

which is one of the cardinal principles of British rule in India. The

agitation against it is not the agitation of the European whose

susceptibility is offended at a state of things that he finds hard to

reconcile with the reverence and purity of Divine worship; but it is the

outcry of the reverent Hindu against one of the corrupt and degrading

practices that, in the course of centuries, have crept into his

religion. In this particular instance the Mysore Government cannot be

accused of acting hastily. As long ago as February, 1892, they issued a

circular order describing the legitimate services to be performed in

Temples by Temple women. In 1899, the Muzrai Superintendent, Rai Bahadur

A. Sreenivasa Charlu, directed that the Temple women borne on the

Nanjangud Temple establishment should not be allowed to perform _tafe_

(or dancing) service in the Temple; but that the allowances payable to

them should be continued for their lifetime, and that at their death the

vacancies should not be filled up. Against this order the Temple women

concerned memorialised H.H. the Maharajah as long ago as 1905, and the

order disposing of it has only just been issued. In the course of the

latter the Government say:--

"'From the Shastraic authorities quoted by the two Agamiks employed in

the Muzrai Secretariat, it is observed that the services to be performed

by Temple women form part and parcel of the worship of the god in Hindu

Temples, and that singing and dancing in the presence of the deity are

also prescribed. It is, however, observed that in the case of Temple

women personal purity and rectitude of conduct and a vow of celibacy

were considered essential. But the high ideals entertained in ancient

days have now degenerated. . . . The Government now observe that whatever

may have been the original object of the institution of Temple women in

Temples, the state in which these Temple servants are now found fully

justifies the action taken by them in excluding the Temple women from

every kind of service in sacred institutions like Temples. Further, the

absence of the services of these women in certain important Temples in

the State has become established for nearly fifteen years past, and the

public have become accustomed to the idea of doing without such

services.'

"The exclusion of Temple women from Temple services obtains in Mysore in

the case of a few large Temples whose _Tasdik Pattis_ have been revised.

But the time has come, the Government think, for its general

application, and they therefore direct that the policy enunciated in the

abstract given above should be extended to all Muzrai Temples in the

State. It is to be hoped that the good example thus set will bear fruit

elsewhere, where the Temple women evil is more notorious than it was in

Temples of Mysore."

A copy of the Government document to which this cutting relates lies

before me. It is bravely and clearly worded, and its intention is

evident. The high-minded Hindu--and there are such, let it not be

forgotten--revolts from the degradation and pollution of this travesty

of religion, and will abolish it where he can. _But let it be remembered

that, good as this law is, it does not and it cannot touch the great

Secret Traffic itself. That will go on behind the law, and behind the

next that is made, and the next, unless measures are devised to ensure

its being thoroughly enforced._

Cuttings from newspapers, quotations, evidence--it is not interesting

reading, and yet we look to our friends to go through to the end with

us. Let us pause for a moment here and remember the purpose of it all;

and may the thought of some little, loved child make an atmosphere for

these chapters!

Lotus Buds · 第 27 / 30 章