CHRISTENDOM'S WITCHCRAFT DEVIL.

Christians, when New England witchcraft occurred, generally believed that

it originated with, emanated from, and was controlled by _one_ vast

malignant personality, possessing frightful powers, aspects, and

efficiency. A fair comprehension of what that being was then conceived to

be is needful to anything like accurate knowledge of the origin, growth,

sway, exit, and genuine character of occurrences which outwrought as dire

strifes, horrors, bloodshed, and heart-wrenchings, as any courageous,

intelligent, and conscientious people ever sided forward or suffered

under.

Christendom, in the day of our Puritan forefathers, believed in a devil

peculiar to a few centuries--in one who was of more modern birth than the

Bible or other ancient histories--who was very different from any being

characterized in either Jewish or heathen records of antiquity, and has no

parallel, we trust, in any creed to-day.

Probably many malicious, as well as benevolent, unseen personages exist,

who may often act upon men and their affairs. There may be powerful _evil

ones_, in realms unseen, who there rule over hosts of like dispositions

with themselves. Neither the existence of many devils, nor intermeddling

by them with man's peace and welfare, is called in question.

Authors of the Bible, when using the terms devil, Satan, and others of

similar import, generally designated, as our own age extensively does,

beings very unlike _such_ a devil as was conceived of and dreaded by

Christendom from two to five hundred years ago. Prior to and during the

days of Jesus and his apostles, such terms were often applied to whatever,

in either the visible or the unseen world, tempted or forced men to

wrong-doing, or hindered their progress in goodness. Jesus said to a

disciple, "Get thee behind me, _Satan_;" and this, simply because Peter

was giving him advice more carnal than spiritual, and which was designed

to dissuade Jesus from following the course which his conscience was

prompting him to pursue. The mere giving of unwise advice made Peter _a

Satan_. Turning to 2 Sam. xxiv. 1, you may read that the LORD, being

angry, moved David to number the people. Turning again to 1 Chron. xxi. 1,

you will find a description of the same transaction, in which it is said

that "_Satan_ ... provoked David to number Israel." Therefore, in biblical

language, even the LORD, when angry, was equivalent to Satan. Any accuser,

in a court of justice or equity, might properly have been called a Satan,

in the days of the prophets, for then that term was applicable to any

adversary or opponent, of whatever grade or nature.

Very much later than David's day the word _devil_ frequently had a much

softer meaning than it usually bears now. Jesus said (John vi. 70), "Have

not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is _a devil_?" Having previously

called Peter "Satan," Jesus here called Judas a _devil_. Thus highest

Christian authority spoke of unwise and treacherous men as being Satans

and devils, and thereby showed that those words anciently were sometimes

applied, by the pure and wise, to other beings than one special great

malignant spirit. The devil of modern _witchcraft_ was unknown by Jesus

and by all biblical authors.

Whence, then, since not from the Bible,--whence did Christians of the

seventeenth and some earlier centuries obtain those peculiar conceptions

of him, which made the devil almost counterbalance, in malignity and

monstrosity, the benignity and beauty of the Infinite God? Where did they

find him? So far as we perceive and believe, his like was never

recognized, either outside of Christendom, or prior to the dark ages. No

being verily like him was ever dreaded as an enemy by any other people

than Christians, and not by them till within the last thousand years.

About all that we know is, that he had become huge and frightful at the

time of the Reformation; and our belief is, that morbid fancy, in the

cloisters and monasteries of Europe, through several centuries plied her

limnistic verbal skill, and thereby outlined and blackened piecemeal her

most _outre_ conceptions possible of the lineaments and expressions of a

being as monstrous in shape, as powerful, wily, and malicious, as

imagination could fabricate, and thus gave the Christian world a monk-made

devil--a hideous personification of evil. Lapsing time eventually caused

this cloister-born scarecrow to be looked upon as vitalized malignity

incarnate--as an immortal, ubiquitous personality--as a living fiend of

awful sway and force, who should be watched, feared, and fought by every

God-serving man. We look upon him as a production of human fancy. But not

so did our predecessors. They assigned to their devil of horrid form and

huge dimensions a very different origin and nature.

Where born, and what his nature, according to the belief of those who

imported him to New England shores, are important questions the

appropriate answers to which must be comprehended before one can obtain

just appreciation of the position in which their creed placed our

forefathers, and the direction and force it gave to their action whenever

seeming diabolism not only fearfully disturbed private firesides and

social relations, but threatened tenure of lands, and continued existence

of church and state throughout the colonies.

Their Author of witchcraft was conceived of, believed in, and set forth in

language, as having been heaven-born--a glorious angel once, but apostate

and banished from his native skies;--as one mighty, malignant personality,

almost ubiquitous, almost omniscient, second in power to Almighty God

alone, and nearly His equal. As quoted by Upham, vol. i. p. 390, Wierius,

a learned German physician, described the devil as being one who

"possesses great courage, incredible cunning, superhuman wisdom, the most

acute penetration, consummate prudence, an incomparable skill in vailing

the most pernicious artifices under a specious disguise, and a malicious

and infinite hatred toward the human race, implacable and incurable."--"He

was," says Appleton's N. A. Cyc., "often represented on the stage, with

black complexion, flaming eyes, sulphuric odor, horns, tail, hooked nails,

and cloven hoof." Many of us now living have seen him pictured nearly thus

in some old illustrated editions of the Bible.

But the gifted Milton's comprehensive fancy and lofty diction, exempted,

under poetic license, from adherence to fact or creed, or other enfeebling

restraint, put forth, in masterly and acceptable manner, lineaments and

features appropriate to an embodiment of his highest possible conceptions

of combined majesty, might, and malignity, and thus allured his own and

future ages to bow in awe before a devil who in grandeur far surpassed any

which monkish powers had been able to fabricate and describe. He imputed

to Satan "eyes that sparkling blaz'd; his other parts, besides prone on

the flood, extended long and large lay floating many a rood," ...

"unconquerable will, and study of revenge, immortal hate, and courage

never to submit or yield," ... "resolve to wage by force or guile eternal

war, irreconcilable to our grand foe, ... ever to do ill our sole delight,

as being the contrary to his high will whom we resist; If then his

providence out of our evil seek to bring forth good, our labor must be to

prevent that end, and out of good still to find means of evil." Such was

the great poet's "Archangel ruined;" nearly such was the prevalent

perception of him by the general mind of Christendom. He was one mighty

Evil Spirit--monarch of all fiends, and an untiring operator for harm to

both the body and soul of man.

Such conceptions were general alike in Europe and America. But still

another view, quite as appalling as any of the foregoing, and appealing

more directly to the temporal interests of men, operated in _America_, and

made it specially needful for all property holders here to contest the

devil's advances. Cotton Mather called the arch mischief-worker "a great

landholder;" and he was spoken of as though conceived to be temporal as

well as spiritual ruler over all Indian tribes and their lands, and also

as being a contester against God and Christ for empire over each and every

part of the American continent where Christians encroached upon his sable

majesty's domains. God and devil--each was a vast and powerful spirit,

exercising sway and dominion widely, as the other would let him; and these

two mighty spiritual Rulers were often struggling in sharp conflict of

doubtful issue for empire over particular portions of the earth. The

Devil--and such a devil too--occupied much space not only in the theology

and philosophy of the learned, but also in the daily and worldly thoughts

of the common colonists.

Upham has forcefully and truthfully said (vol. i. p. 393), that our

fathers "were under an impression that the devil, having failed to prevent

progress of knowledge in Europe, had abandoned his efforts to obstruct it

effectually there; had withdrawn into the American wilderness, intending

here to make a final stand; and had resolved to retain an undiminished

empire over the whole continent and his pagan allies, the native

inhabitants. Our fathers accounted for the extraordinary descent, and

incursions of the Evil One among them, in 1692, on the supposition "that

it was a desperate effort to prevent them from bringing civilization and

Christianity within his favorite retreat; and their souls were fired with

the glorious thought, that, by carrying on the war with vigor against him

and his confederates, the witches, they would become chosen and honored

instruments in the hands of God for breaking down and abolishing the last

stronghold on the earth of the kingdom of darkness."

This mighty Devil, commander-in-chief of the countless hosts of all the

devils, demons, satans, Indians, heathen, sinners in, above, upon, or

around earth,--this mighty contester for dominion with God and Christ and

all good Christians, was conceived to be author of all works called

witchcrafts, producing them through human beings who had voluntarily made

a covenant to serve him, and who resided in the midst of the people whom

he molested; for we shall soon see that the philosophy of those times

permitted him no other possible access to man than through persons who

were in covenant with himself.

Any covenanter with such a devil, that is, any wizard or witch, could be

regarded by the public as nothing less formidable than a voracious wolf

burrowing within the Christian sheepfold, who, if not at once unearthed

and slain, would either actually devour, or frighten away from their

pasturing grounds, all those with their descendants who had crossed the

ocean to feed on the hills and vales of America. Our fathers felt that the

possession and value of their homes and lands, as well as the temporal

peace and prosperity of the community, its religious privileges, and the

salvation of human souls, were at stake in a witchcraft conflict. Their

faith, their interests temporal and spiritual, their manhood, and all that

was brave, strong, and good in them, called upon them to face boldly even

such a devil as has been described above, and to fight him by any

processes which had been tried and approved in Europe; the chief of which

was, to seize his covenanted servants--his guns--and silence them promptly

and permanently. Witches must die!

Witchcraft of New England Explained by Modern Spiritualism · 第 64 / 74 题