But slavery makes the general education of the whites impossible. You

cannot have general education without Common Schools. Common Schools

cannot exist where the population is sparse. Where slaves till the

soil, or do the principal part of whatever work is done, the free

population must be sparse. Slavery, then, by an inexorable law, denies

general education to the whites. The providence of God is just and

retributive. Create a serf caste, and debar them from education, and

you necessarily debar a great portion of the privileged class from

education also. It is impossible, in the present state of things,

or in any state of things which can be foreseen, to have free and

universal education in a slave state. The difficulty is insurmountable.

For a well-organized system of Common Schools, there should be two

hundred children, at least, living in such proximity to each other that

the oldest of them can come together to a central school. It is not

enough to gather from within a circle of half a dozen miles’ diameter

fifty or sixty children for a single school. This brings all ages and

all studies into the same room. A good system requires a separation of

school children into four, or at least into three, classes, according

to ages and attainments. Without this gradation, a school is bereft

of more than half its efficiency. Now, this can never be done in an

agricultural community where there are two classes of men--one to do

all the work, and the other to seize all the profits. With New England

habits of industry, and with that diversified labor which would be sure

to spring from intelligence, the State of Virginia, which skirts us

here on the south, would support all the population of the New England

states, and fill them with abundance.

Mr. BAYLY. We have as great a population as New England now.

Mr. MANN. As great a population as New England!!

Mr. BAYLY. We send fifteen representatives.

[A voice. And how many of them represent slaves?]

Mr. MANN. Massachusetts alone sends ten representatives.

[A voice. And the rest of New England twenty-one more.]

Mr. MANN. I say, sir, the single State of Virginia could support

in abundance the whole population of New England. With such a free

population, the school children would be so numerous that public

schools might be opened within three or four miles of each other all

over its territory,--the light of each of which, blending with its

neighboring lights, would illumine the whole land. They would be

schools, too, in point of cheapness, within every man’s means. The

degrading idea of pauper schools would be discarded forever. But what

is the condition of Virginia now? One quarter part of all its adult

free white population are unable to read or write, and were proclaimed

to be so by a late governor, in his annual message, without producing

any reform. Their remedy is to choose a governor who will not proclaim

such a fact. When has Virginia, in any state or national election,

given a majority equal to the number of its voters unable to read

or write? A _republican_ government supported by the two pillars of

Slavery and Ignorance!

In South Carolina there is also a fund for the support of pauper

schools; but this had become so useless, and was so disdained by its

objects, that a late governor of the state, in his annual message,

recommended that it should be withdrawn from them altogether.

Yet in many of the slave states there are beautiful paper systems

of Common Schools,--dead laws in the statute books,--and the census

tells us how profitless they have been. In 1840, in the fifteen slave

states and territories, there were only 201,085 scholars at the primary

schools. In the same class of schools in the free states, there were

1,626,028,--eight times as many. New York alone had 502,367, or two

and a half times as many. The scholars in the primary schools of

Ohio alone, outnumbered all those in the fifteen slave states and

territories by more than 17,000. In the slave states, almost one tenth

part of the free white population over twenty years of age are unable

to read and write. In the free states, less than one in one hundred and

fifty; and at least four fifths of these are foreigners, who ought not

to be included in the computation. Many of the slave states, too, have

munificent school funds. Kentucky has one of more than a million of

dollars; Tennessee, of two millions; yet, in 1837, Governor Clarke, of

Kentucky, declared, in his message to the legislature, that “one third

of the adult population were unable to write their names;” and in the

State of Tennessee, according to the last census, there were 58,531 of

the same description of persons. Surely it would take more than five

of these to make three freemen; for the more a state has of them, the

less of intelligent freedom will there be in it. And if the schools

in the slave states are compared with the schools in the free states,

the deficiency in quality will be found as great as the deficiency in

number.

Sir, during the last ten years I have had a most extensive

correspondence with the intelligent friends of education in the slave

states. They yearn for progress, but they cannot obtain it. They

procure laws to be passed, but there is no one to execute them. They

set forth the benefits and the blessings of education; but they speak

in a vacuum, and no one hears the appeal. If a parent wishes to educate

his children, he must send them from home, and thus suffer a sort

of bereavement, even while they live; or he must employ a tutor or

governess in his family, which few are able to do. The rich may do it,

but what becomes of the children of the poor? In cities the obstacles

are less; but the number of persons resident in cities is relatively

small. All this is the inevitable consequence of slavery; and it is

as impossible for free, thorough, universal education to coëxist with

slavery as for two bodies to occupy the same space at the same time.

Slavery would abolish education, if it should invade a free state;

education would abolish slavery, if it _could_ invade a slave state.

Destroying common education, slavery destroys the fruits of common

education,--the inventive mind, practical talent, the power of adapting

means to ends in the business of life. Whence have come all those

mechanical and scientific improvements and inventions which have

enriched the world with so many comforts, and adorned it with so many

beauties; which to-day give enjoyments and luxuries to a common family

in a New England village, that neither Queen Elizabeth of England nor

any of her proud court ever dreamed of, but a little more than two

centuries ago? Among whom have these improvements originated? All

history and experience affirm that they have come, and must come, from

people among whom education is most generous and unconfined. Increase

the _constituency_, if I may so speak, of developed intellect, and you

increase in an equal ratio the chances of inventive, creative genius.

From what part of our own country has come the application of steam

to the propulsion of boats for commercial purposes, or of wheels for

manufacturing purposes? Where have the various and almost infinite

improvements been made which have resulted in the present perfection

of cotton and woollen machinery? Whence came the invention of the

cotton-gin, and the great improvements in railroads? Where was born the

mighty genius who invented the first lightning rod, which sends the

electric fluid harmless into the earth; or that other genius, not less

beneficent, who invented the second lightning rod, which sends the same

fluid from city to city on messages of business or of affection? Sir,

these are results which you can no more have without common education,

without imbuing the public mind with the elements of knowledge, than

you can have corn without planting, or harvests without sunshine.

Look into the Patent Office reports, and see in what sections of

country mechanical improvements and the application of science to the

useful arts have originated. Out of _five hundred and seventy-two_

patents issued in 1847, only _sixty-six_ went to the slave states. The

patents annually issued, it is true, are a mingled heap of chaff and

wheat, but some of it is wheat worthy of Olympus. I think the Patent

Office reports show that at least six or eight times as many patents

have been taken out for the north as for the south. What improvements

will a slave ever make in agricultural implements; in the manufacture

of metals; in preparing wool, cotton, silk, fur, or paper; in chemical

processes; in the application of steam; in philosophical, nautical,

or optical instruments; in civil engineering, architecture, the

construction of roads, canals, wharves, bridges, docks, piers, &c.;

in hydraulics or pneumatics; in the application of the mechanical

powers; in household furniture, or wearing apparel; in printing,

binding, engraving, &c., &c.? This question, when put in reference to

slaves, appears ridiculous; and yet it is no more absurd, when asked

in reference to an ignorant slave, than when asked in reference to an

uneducated white man. The fact that the latter is a voter makes no

difference, notwithstanding the common opinion, in certain latitudes,

that it does. All such improvements come from minds which have had an

early awakening, and been put on scientific trains of thought in their

childhood and youth,--a thing utterly impossible for the people at

large, without Common Schools.

These are causes; now look at effects. In the New England states, the

iron manufacture is twenty times as much, according to the population,

as it is in Virginia; and yet Virginia has far more of the ore than

they. In cotton, we can hardly find a fraction low enough to express

the difference. The ship-building in Maine and Massachusetts is

thirty-five times as much as in Virginia. The north comes to the south,

cuts their timber, carries it home, manufactures it, and then brings

it back, wrought into a hundred different forms, to be sold to those

who would see it rot before their eyes.

Can any man give a reason why Norfolk should not have grown like New

York, other than the difference in the institutions of the people?

Jamestown was settled before Plymouth, and had _natural_ advantages

superior to it. Plymouth now has a population of between seven and

eight thousand, is worth two millions of dollars, and taxed itself last

year, for schools and schoolhouses, more than seven thousand dollars. I

ought rather to say, that it invested more than seven thousand dollars

in a kind of stock that yields a hundred per cent. income. How many

bats there may be in the ruins of Jamestown, the last census does not

inform us.

The books printed at the south I suppose not to be equal to _one

fiftieth_ part of the number printed at the north. In maps, charts,

engravings, and so forth, the elements of comparison exist only on one

side.

Out of universal education come genius, skill, and enterprise, and the

desire of bettering one’s condition. Industry and frugality are their

concomitants. Diversified labor secures a home market. Diligence earns

much, but the absence of the vices of indolence saves more. Hence

comforts abound, while capital accumulates. After the home consumption

is supplied, there is a surplus for export. The balance of trade is

favorable. All the higher institutions of learning and religion can be

liberally supported. These institutions impart an elevated and moral

tone to society. Hence efforts for all kinds of social ameliorations.

Temperance societies spring up. Societies for preventing crime; for

saving from pauperism; for the reform of prisons and the reformation

of prisoners; for peace; for sending missionaries to the heathen; for

diffusing the gospel,--all these, where a sound education is given,

grow up, in the order of Providence, as an oak grows out of an acorn.

In one thing the south has excelled,--in training statesmen. The

primary and the ultimate effects of slavery upon this fact are so well

set forth in a late sermon by Dr. Bushnell, of Hartford, Connecticut,

that I will read a passage from it:--

“And here, since this institution of slavery, entering into the

fortunes of our history, complicates in so many ways the disorders

we suffer, I must pause a few moments to sketch its characteristics.

Slavery, it is not to be denied, is an essentially barbarous

institution. It gives us, too, that sign which is the perpetual

distinction of barbarism, that it has no law of progress. The highest

level it reaches is the level at which it begins. Indeed, we need not

scruple to allow that it has yielded us one considerable advantage,

in virtue of the fact that it produces its best condition first.

For while the northern people were generally delving in labor, for

many generations, to create a condition of comfort, slavery set the

masters at once on a footing of ease, gave them leisure for elegant

intercourse, for unprofessional studies, and seasoned their character

thus with that kind of cultivation which distinguishes men of society.

A class of statesmen were thus raised up, who were prepared to figure

as leaders in scenes of public life, where so much depends on manners

and social address. But now the scale is changing. Free labor is

rising, at length, into a state of wealth and comfort, to take the

lead of American society. Meanwhile, the foster-sons of slavery,--the

high families, the statesmen,--gradually receding in character, as

they must under this vicious institution, are receding also in power

and influence, and have been ever since the revolution. Slavery is

a condition against nature; the curse of nature, therefore, is on

it, and it bows to its doom by a law as irresistible as gravity. It

produces a condition of ease which is not the reward of labor, and a

state of degradation which is not the curse of idleness. Therefore,

the ease it enjoys cannot but end in a curse, and the degradation

it suffers cannot rise into a blessing. It nourishes imperious and

violent passions. It makes the masters solitary sheiks on their

estates, forbidding thus the possibility of public schools, and

preventing also that condensed form of society which is necessary to

the vigorous maintenance of churches. Education and religion thus

displaced, the dinner table only remains, and on this hangs, in great

part, the keeping of the social state. But however highly we may

estimate the humanizing power of hospitality, it cannot be regarded

as any sufficient spring of character. It is neither a school nor a

gospel. And when it comes of self-indulgence, or only seeks relief

for the tedium of an idle life, scarcely does it bring with it the

blessings of a virtue. The accomplishments it yields are of a mock

quality, rather than of a real, having about the same relation to a

substantial and finished culture that honor has to character. This

kind of currency will pass no longer; for, it is not expense without

comfort, or splendor set in disorder, as diamonds in pewter; it is not

air in place of elegance, or assurance substituted for ease; neither

is it to be master of a fluent speech, or to garnish the same with

stale quotations from the classics; much less is it to live in the

Don Juan vein, accepting barbarism by poetic inspiration,--the same

by which a late noble poet, drawing out of Turks and pirates, became

the chosen laureate of slavery,--not any or all of these can make up

such a style of man, or of life, as we in this age demand. We have

come up now to a point where we look for true intellectual refinement,

and a ripe state of personal culture. But how clearly is it seen to

be a violation of its own laws, for slavery to produce a genuine

scholar, or a man who, in any department of excellence, unless it be

in politics, is not a full century behind his time? And if we ask for

what is dearer and better still, for a pure Christian morality, the

youth of slavery are trained in no such habits as are most congenial

to virtue. The point of honor is the only principle many of them know.

Violence and dissipation bring down every succeeding generation to

a state continually lower; so that now, after a hundred and fifty

years are passed, the slaveholding territory may be described as a

vast missionary ground, and one so uncomfortable to the faithful

ministry of Christ, by reason of its jealous tempers, and the known

repugnance it has to many of the first maxims of the gospel, that

scarcely a missionary can be found to enter it. Connected with this

moral decay, the resources of nature also are exhausted, and her

fertile territories changed to a desert, by the uncreating power of a

spendthrift institution. And then, having made a waste where God had

made a garden, slavery gathers up the relics of bankruptcy, and the

baser relics still of virtue and all manly enterprise, and goes forth

to renew, on a virgin soil, its dismal and forlorn history. Thus, at

length, has been produced what may be called the bowie-knife style

of civilization, and the new west of the south is overrun by it,--a

spirit of blood which defies all laws of God and man;--honorable, but

not honest; prompt to resent an injury, slack to discharge a debt;

educated to ease, and readier, of course, when the means of living

fail, to find them at the gambling table or the race-ground, than in

any work of industry,--probably squandering the means of living there,

to relieve the tedium of ease itself.”

The free schools of the north lead to the common diffusion of

knowledge, and the equalization of society. The private schools of

the south divide men into patricians and plebeians; so that, in the

latter, a nuisance grows out of education itself. In the public schools

of New York there are libraries now amounting to more than a million

of volumes. In the schools of Massachusetts the number of volumes

is relatively less; but the quality is greatly superior. In each of

these states, within half an hour’s walk of the poorest farm-house or

mechanic’s shop, there is a library, free and open to every child,

containing works of history, biography, travels, ethics, natural

science, &c., &c., which will supply him with the noblest capital of

intelligence, wherewith to commence the business of making himself a

useful and intelligent citizen. With the exception of New Orleans,

(whose free schools were commenced and have been presided over by a

Massachusetts man,) and three or four other cities, all the libraries

in the public schools of the slave states could be carried in a

schoolboy’s satchel. The libraries of all the universities and colleges

of the south contain 223,416 volumes; those of the north, 593,897

volumes. The libraries of southern theological schools, 22,800; those

of northern, 102,080.

Look into Silliman’s Journal, or the volumes of the American Academy of

Arts and Sciences, and inquire whence the communications came. Where

live the historians of the country, Sparks, Prescott, Bancroft; the

poets, Whittier, Bryant, Longfellow, Lowell; the jurists, Story, Kent,

Wheaton; the classic models of writing, Charming, Everett, Irving;

the female writers, Miss Sedgwick, Mrs. Sigourney, and Mrs. Child?

All this proceeds from no superiority of natural endowment on the one

side, or inferiority on the other. The Southern States are all within

what may be called “the latitudes of genius;” for there is a small

belt around the globe, comprising but a few degrees of latitude, which

has produced all the distinguished men who have ever lived. I say this

difference results from no difference in natural endowment. The mental

endowments at the south are equal to those in any part of the world.

But it comes because, in one quarter, the common atmosphere is vivified

with knowledge, electric with ideas, while slavery gathers its Bœotian

fogs over the other. What West Point has been to our armies in Mexico,

that, and more than that, good schools would be to the intelligence and

industrial prosperity of our country.

It may seem a little out of place, but I cannot forbear here adverting

to one point, which, as a lover of children and as a parent, touches

me more deeply than any other. To whom are intrusted, at the south,

the early care and nurture of children? It has been thought by many

educators and metaphysicians, that children learn as much before the

age of seven years as ever afterwards. Who, at the south, administers

this early knowledge,--these ideas, these views, that have such

sovereign efficacy in the formation of adult character? Who has the

custody of children during this ductile, forming, receptive period of

life,--a period when the mind absorbs whatever is brought into contact

with it? Sir, the children of the south, more or less, and generally

_more_, are tended and nurtured by slaves. Ignorance, superstition,

vulgarity, passion, and perhaps impurity, are the breasts at which

they nurse. Whatever afflictions God may see fit to bring upon me,

whatever other mercies He may withhold, may He give me none but persons

of intelligence, of refinement, and of moral excellence, to walk with

my children during the imitative years of their existence, and to lead

them in the paths of knowledge, and breathe into their hearts the

breath of a moral and religious life.

Before considering the moral character of slavery, I wish to advert

for a moment to the position which we occupy as one of the nations

of the earth, in this advancing period of the world’s civilization.

Nations, like individuals, have a character. The date of the latter is

counted by years; that of the former, by centuries. No man can have any

self-respect, who is not solicitous about his posthumous reputation.

No man can be a patriot who feels neither joy nor shame at the idea

of the honor or the infamy which his age and his country shall leave

behind them. Nations, like individuals, have characteristic objects of

ambition. Greece coveted the arts; Rome gloried in war; but liberty

has been the goddess of our idolatry. Amid the storms of freedom were

we cradled; in the struggles of freedom have our joints been knit;

on the rich aliment of freedom have we grown to our present stature.

With a somewhat too boastful spirit, perhaps, have we challenged the

admiration of the world for our devotion to liberty; but an enthusiasm

for the rights of man is so holy a passion, that even its excesses

are not devoid of the beautiful. We have not only won freedom for

ourselves, but we have taught its sacred lessons to others. The shout

of “Death to tyrants, and freedom for man!” which pealed through this

country seventy years ago, has at length reached across the Atlantic;

and whoever has given an attentive ear to the sounds which have come

back to us, within the last few months, from the European world, cannot

have failed to perceive that they were only the far-travelled echoes

of the American Declaration of Independence. But in the divine face of

our liberty there has been one foul, demoniac feature. Whenever her

votaries would approach her to worship, they have been fain to draw a

veil over one part of her visage, to conceal its hideousness. Whence

came this deformity on her otherwise fair and celestial countenance?

Sad is the story, but it must be told. Her mother was a vampire. As

the daughter lay helpless in her arms, the beldam tore open her living

flesh, and feasted upon her lifeblood. Hence this unsightly wound, that

affrights whoever beholds it. But, sir, I must leave dallying with

these ambiguous metaphors. One wants the plain, sinewy, Saxon tongue

to tell of deeds that should have shamed devils. Great Britain was the

mother. Her American colonies were the daughter. The mother lusted for

gold. To get it, she made partnership with robbery and death. Shackles,

chains, and weapons for human butchery, were her outfit in trade. She

made Africa her hunting-ground. She made its people her prey, and

the unwilling colonies her market-place. She broke into the Ethiop’s

home, as a wolf into a sheepfold at midnight. She set the continent

a-flame, that she might seize the affrighted inhabitants as they ran

shrieking from their blazing hamlets. The aged and the infant she left

for the vultures; but the strong men and the strong women she drove,

scourged and bleeding, to the shore. Packed and stowed like merchandise

between unventilated decks, so close that the tempest without could

not ruffle the pestilential air within, the voyage was begun. Once

a day the hatches were opened, to receive food and to disgorge the

dead. Thousands and thousands of corpses, which she plunged into the

ocean from the decks of her slave ships, she counted only as the tare

of commerce. The blue monsters of the deep became familiar with her

pathway, and, not more remorseless than she, they shared her plunder.

At length the accursed vessel reached the foreign shore. And there,

monsters of the land, fiercer and feller than any that roam the watery

plains, rewarded the robber by purchasing his spoils.

Slavery: letters and speeches · 第 4 / 45 段