CHAPTER IV.

CASTANOPSIS.

California chestnut. Western chinquapin. Evergreen chestnut.

Castanopsis, Spach. Name derived from _Castanea_, the chestnut.

Order, _Cupuliferae_. A genus of evergreen shrubs and trees,

intermediate between the oaks (_Quercus_) and the chestnuts

(_Castanea_). There are about a dozen species indigenous to Eastern

Asia and the adjacent islands. Blume, in "Flora Javae," Vol. II,

1828-36, describes three species under _Castanea_, which he found in

the mountains and more elevated regions of the Javanese islands.

Very little, however, is known of these oriental evergreen chestnuts

outside of the herbariums of professional botanists, and they are

rarely referred to, even in standard botanical dictionaries, or

dictionaries of gardening, and when mentioned they are usually

placed in the genus _Castanea_. Edouard Spach, a half-century or

more ago, gave a synopsis of the genus, for which he proposed the

name of _Castanopsis_, and although not recognized by botanists in

general for a number of years, it is now accepted by botanical

authorities everywhere. We have but one indigenous species, and this

on the Pacific coast, viz:

[Illustration: FIG. 10. LEAVES AND NUT OF CASTANOPSIS CHRYSOPHYLLA.]

_Castanopsis chrysophylla_, A. de Candolle. _Castanea chrysophylla_,

Douglas. _Castanea sempervirens_, Kellogg.

"Leaves coriaceous, evergreen, lanceolate or oblong, one to four

inches long, acuminate or only acutish (Fig. 10), cuneate at

base and shortly petioled, entire green and glabrous above or

somewhat scurfy, densely scurfy beneath, with none or few yellow

scales; male aments one to three inches long, densely pubescent;

styles three, stout, glabrous, divergent; fruiting involucre

with stout divergent spines (Fig. 11) one-half to one inch long,

subverticillately many branched; nut usually solitary, obversely

triangular, six lines long."--"Geological Survey of California,"

Botany, Vol. II, p. 100.

"This handsome broad-leaved evergreen tree is indigenous to the

elevated regions, from Monterey, California, northward to the

Columbia river in Oregon. It is also common in the Sierra

Nevadas at elevations of six thousand feet, but in its southern

limits rarely below ten thousand feet elevation."--C. S. Sargent

("Woods of the United States").

In the warmer and drier regions of California it is a mere shrub two

to six feet high, and these dwarf forms have, in some instances,

been described as varieties. As, for instance, _Castanea

chrysophylla_, var. _minor_, Bentham; _C. chrysophylla_, var.

_minor_, A. de Candolle; and _C. chrysophylla_, var. _pumila_,

Vasey. But northward, where the climate is more moist, it becomes a

large tree fifty to one hundred and twenty feet high, with a stem

two to three feet in diameter. In its wide variation in habit of

growth, this western chinquapin is similar to our Eastern dwarf

chestnut, which is mainly a low shrub in the more Southern States,

but becomes a fair-sized tree in the Middle States, or near its

northern limits.

[Illustration: FIG. 11. CASTANOPSIS BUR.]

I have introduced the Western chinquapin here among the nut-bearing

trees, not with the idea that it will ever be extensively cultivated

for its edible nuts, but because it is a beautiful broad-leaved

evergreen tree, and of which we have far too few kinds in

cultivation to give warmth and a cheerful aspect to our gardens and

pleasure grounds in winter. It is true that, so far as can be

learned at this time, no extended experiments have ever been made to

introduce or cultivate the Castanopsis in the Atlantic States,

consequently nothing positive is known as to whether it will succeed

here or not. In its northernmost range it thrives in forests among

many kinds of trees and shrubs that are already common in our

gardens, and this leads me to think that specimens or seeds of this

tree procured from the mountains of northern Oregon will withstand

the rigors of our climate.

Mr. S. B. Parsons writes me that he first saw _Castanopsis

chrysophylla_ in Kew Gardens (Eng.) thirty-five years ago, and

procured specimens, which were planted in his gardens at Flushing,

N. Y., but they failed, presumably because not hardy. It may be that

his specimens were raised from nuts procured in the warmer part of

California, and, as with many other Pacific coast plants, proved to

be tender, while later introductions of the same species collected

in colder localities have proved hardy here. In my experience I have

found a great difference in the hardiness of trees and plants

obtained from the higher and lower levels of the mountains from

Colorado westward to the Coast range, for in those regions

acclimation extending over thousands of years has developed and

fixed certain physiological attributes, which enables them to

readily adapt themselves to similar conditions elsewhere, especially

in the line of temperature. It may make no difference to those who

want plants for warm climates, whether they are obtained from

mountain or valley, but it certainly does to those who value

hardiness above all other merits.

In horticultural matters we are supposed to confine ourselves within

certain natural lines in making experiments, but if we fail in one,

or one hundred, it proves little beyond the bare fact that we have

not been successful. I have experimented enough to have become

somewhat wary of deciding that a thing cannot be done, or is

impossible, because of my own and others' failures. Every practical

horticulturist can call to mind many productions which had evaded

the pursuit of experimenters for decades and even centuries.

For specimens of the nuts, burs and plants of this handsome

nut-bearing tree I am indebted to Mr. J. J. Harden, of Stayton,

Oregon, who informs me that it grows in the mountains near by to a

very large size, and among such well-known kinds of shrubs and trees

as _Rhamnus Purshianus_, _Cornus Nuttalli_, _Corylus rostrata_, and

various species of conifers which are now more or less common in our

Eastern gardens and parks. The twigs and leaves are shown in Fig.

10, and below a nut, and in Fig. 11 a bur, all of natural size. The

small conical nut is slightly triangular, with a rather firm,

brittle shell, not fibrous as in the acorn and chestnut. The burs

are produced singly, but sometimes several on a twig, and when

mature, instead of opening by valves, as in the true chestnut, they

break up irregularly. The kernels are sweet and excellent flavored,

and are sought for by various kinds of birds, as well as by all the

squirrel tribe, and for this reason it is very difficult to procure

specimens, unless gathered before they are fully ripe. The nuts do

not mature the first season, but pass the winter in a partly

developed stage, usually ripening the second year about midsummer

or, in northern Oregon, in July.

It is quite probable that this Castanopsis, when planted in the

Atlantic States, will require a little shade or protection, like the

American holly and similar broad-leaved evergreens, and while it may

not thrive anywhere north of Delaware and Maryland, it is worth

trying, as the sole native representative of a genus containing

several species of noble evergreen trees.

The Nut Culturist A Treatise on Propogation, Planting, and Cultivation of Nut Bearing Trees and Shrubs Adapted to the Climate of the United States · 第 4 / 9 章