Mr. HUBERT. You have no objections?
Mr. SORRELS. No.
Mr. HUBERT. I take it those notes were made contemporaneously with the
interviews, as they went on?
Mr. SORRELS. The ones of Ruby were; yes. Now, there is other stuff in
here that had nothing to do with that.
Mr. HUBERT. Well, we are interested of course only in the Ruby ones.
But you testified a little while ago, and you seemed to be referring
to notes, about what Ruby said, and what happened and so forth in the
first interview, and then also in the second interview.
The notes that you referred to on both occasions were made
contemporaneously with the interview. That is, they were not made at a
later date?
Mr. SORRELS. That is correct. Now, there is other stuff in this
notebook. Like I went up to the identification bureau to check on
his record and so forth, and got his detailed description, and his
fingerprint classification--that had nothing to do with the interview.
Mr. GRIFFIN. I think we ought to take that to show what the practice
was.
Mr. HUBERT. If you do not mind, we will have them photostated, and
after we get the photostats, we will get them an identification number.
Suppose you tell us, then, what occurred at the second interview?
Mr. SORRELS. Continuing with what I started out with a moment ago
there, he--incidentally, I have noted here on this page where I made
these notations “3:15 p.m.,” I assume that is possibly the time this
interrogation took place.