KENT'S HOLE.

One of the most noted of the caves which have been carefully

explored for relics of early man, coeval with extinct animals.

It is in Devonshire, England, near Torquay.

_W. B. Dawkins,

Cave Hunting._

----------KENTUCKY: Start----------

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1748.

First English exploration from Virginia.

See OHIO (VALLEY): A. D. 1748-1754.

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1765-1778.

Absence of Indian inhabitants.

Early exploration and settlement by the whites.

The colony of Transylvania.

In the wars that were waged between the Indian tribes of the

South, before the advent of white settlers, Kentucky became "a

sort of border-land such as separated the Scots and English in

their days of combat. … The Chickasaws alone held their

ground, being the most northern of the sedentary Southern

Indians. Their strongholds on the bluffs of the Mississippi

and the inaccessibility of this country on account of its

deep, sluggish, mud-bordered streams, seem to have given them

a sufficient measure of protection against their enemies, but

elsewhere in the State the Indians were rooted out by their

wars. The last tenants of the State, east of the Tennessee

River, were the Shawnees,—that combative folk who ravaged

this country with their ceaseless wars from the head-waters of

the Tennessee to the Mississippi, and from the Lakes to

Alabama. It was no small advantage to the early settlers of

Kentucky that they found this region without a resident Indian

population, for, bitter as was the struggle with the claimants

of the soil, it never had the danger that would have come from

a contest with the natives in closer proximity to their homes.

… As Kentucky was unoccupied by the Indians, it was

neglected by the French. … Thus the first settlers found

themselves, in the main, free from these dangers due to the

savages and their Gallic allies. The land lay more open to

their occupancy than any other part of this country ever did

to its first European comers. … In 1765 Colonel George

Croghan, who had previously visited the Ohio with Gist, made a

surveying journey down that stream from Pittsburg to the

Mississippi. … In 1766 a party of five persons, including a

mulatto slave, under the command of Captain James Smith,

explored a large part of what is now Tennessee, and probably

extended their journey through Southern Kentucky. Journeys to

Kentucky now became frequent. Every year sent one or more

parties of pioneers to one part or another of the country. In

1769 Daniel Boone and five companions, all from the Yadkin

settlements in North Carolina, came to Eastern Kentucky. One

of the party was killed, but Boone remained, while his

companions returned to their homes. Thus it will be seen that

Boone's first visit was relatively late in the history of

Kentucky explorations. Almost every part of its surface had

been traversed by other explorers before this man, who passes

in history as the typical pioneer, set foot upon its ground.

In the time between 1770 and 1772 George Washington, then a

land-surveyor, made two surveys in the region which is now the

northeast corner of Kentucky. … The first distinct effort to

found a colony was made by James Harrod and about forty

companions, who found their way down the Ohio near to where

Louisville now stands, and thence by land to what is now

Mercer County, in Central Kentucky, where they established, on

June 16, 1774, a village which they called, in honor of their

leader, Harrodsburg. Earlier attempts at settlement were made

at Louisville, but the fear of Indians caused the speedy

abandonment of this post. … In 1775 other and stronger

footholds were gained. Boone built a fort in what is now

Madison County, and Logan another at St. Asaphs, in Lincoln

County. The settlement of Kentucky was greatly favored by the

decisive victory gained by Lord Dunmore's troops over the

Indians from the north of the Ohio, at the mouth of the

Kanawha.

See OHIO VALLEY: A. D. 1774.

… That the process of possessing the land was going on with

speed may be seen from the fact that Henderson and Company,

land-agents at Boonesborough, issued from their office in the

new-built fort entry certificates of surveys for 560,000 acres

of land. The process of survey was of the rudest kind, but it

served the purpose of momentary definition of the areas, made

it possible to deal with the land as a commodity, and left the

tribulations concerning boundaries to the next generation.

These land deeds were given as of the 'colony of

Transylvania,' which was in fact the first appellation of

Kentucky, a name by which it was known for several years

before it received its present appellation. At this time, the

last year that the work of settling Kentucky was done under

the authority of his majesty King George III., there were

probably about 150 men who had placed themselves in

settlements that were intended to be permanent within the

bounds of what is now the Commonwealth of Kentucky. There may

have been as many more doing the endless exploring work which

preceded the choice of a site for their future homes. The men

at Boone's Station claimed, and seem to have been awarded, a

sort of hegemony among the settlements.

{1940}

On the 23d of May, at the call of Colonel Henderson, the

land-agent of the proprietors, delegates from these

settlements met at Boonesborough, and drew up a brief code of

nine laws for the government of the young Commonwealth. …

The Boonesborough parliament adjourned to meet in September,

but it never reassembled. The venture which led to its

institution fell altogether to ruin, and the name of

Transylvania has been almost entirely forgotten. … The

colony of Transylvania rested on a purchase of about

17,000,000 acres, or about one half the present area of

Kentucky, which was made by some people of North Carolina from

the Overhill Cherokee Indians, a part of the great tribe that

dwelt on the Holston River. For this land the unfortunate

adventurers paid the sum of £10,000 of English money. …

Immediately after the Boonesborough parliament the position of

the Transylvania company became very insecure; its own people

began to doubt the validity of the titles they had obtained

from the company, because, after a time, they learned from

various sources that the lands of this region of Kentucky had

been previously ceded to the English government by the Six

Nations, and were included in the Virginia charter. In the

latter part of 1775, eighty men of the Transylvania settlement

signed a memorial asking to be taken under the protection of

Virginia; or, if that colony thought it best, that their

petition might be referred to the General Congress. … The

proprietors of the colony made their answer to this rebellion

by sending a delegate to the Federal Congress at Philadelphia,

who was to request that the colony of Transylvania be added to

the number of the American colonies. … Nothing came of this

protest. Congress refused to seat their delegate, Patrick

Henry and Jefferson, then representing Virginia, opposing the

efforts of the proprietors. The Governor of North Carolina

issued a proclamation declaring their purchase illegal. The

colony gradually fell to pieces, though the State of Virginia

took no decided action with reference to it until, in 1778,

that Commonwealth declared the acts of the company void, but,

in a generous spirit, offered compensation to Colonel

Henderson and the other adventurers. The Transylvania company

received 200,000 acres of valuable lands, and their sales to

actual settlers were confirmed by an act of the Virginia

Assembly. Thus the strongest, though not the first, colony of

Kentucky, was a misadventure and quickly fell to pieces."

_N. S. Shaler,

Kentucky,

chapters 5-7._

ALSO IN;

_T. Roosevelt,

The Winning of the West,

volume 1, chapters 6 and 8-12._

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1768.

The Treaty with the Six Nations at Fort Stanwix.

Pretended cession of the country south of the Ohio.

See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1765-1768.

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1774.

The western Territorial claims of Virginia.

Lord Dunmore's war with the Indians.

See OHIO (VALLEY): A. D. 1774.

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1775-1784.

A county of Virginia.

Indian warfare of the Revolution.

Aspirations towards State independence.

"In the winter of 1775 Kentucky was formed into a county of

Virginia. … About this time Harrodsburg, Boonesborough and

Logan's Fort were successively assailed by the Indians. They

withstood the furious attacks made upon them; not, however,

without great loss. During the succeeding summer they were

considerably reinforced by a number of men from North

Carolina, and about 100 under Colonel Bowman from Virginia. In

1778 Kentucky was invaded by an army of Indians and Canadians

under the command of Captain Duquesne; and the expedition of

Colonel George Rodgers Clark against the English post of

Vincennes and Kaskaskia took place this year. In February of

this year Boone, with about 30 men, was engaged in making salt

at the Lower Blue Licks, when he was surprised by about 200

Indians. The whole party surrendered upon terms of

capitulation. The Indians carried them to Detroit, and

delivered them all up to the commandant, except Boone, whom

they carried to Chilicothe. Boone soon effected his escape.

… After … some weeks … Captain Duquesne, with about 500

Indians and Canadians, made his appearance before

Boonesborough, and besieged the fort for the space of nine

days, but finally decamped with the loss of 30 men killed, and

a much greater number wounded. … About the first of April,

1779, Robert Patterson erected a block house, with some

adjacent defenses, where the city of Lexington now stands.

This year, the celebrated land law of Kentucky was passed by

the Legislature of Virginia, usually called the Occupying

Claimant Law. The great defect of this law was, that Virginia,

by this act, did not provide for the survey of the country at

the expense of the State. … Each one holding a warrant could

locate it where he pleased, and survey it at his own cost. …

The consequence of this law was … a flood of emigration

during the years 1780 and 1781. During this period the

emigrants were greatly annoyed by the frequent incursions of

the Indians, and their entire destruction sometimes seemed

almost inevitable. This law was a great feast for the lawyers

of that day. … In November, 1780, Kentucky was divided into

three counties, bearing the names of Fayette, Lincoln, and

Jefferson. … In 1782, Indian hostility was earlier, more

active and shocking than it had ever been in the country

before; a great battle was fought upon Hinkston's Fork of the

Licking, near where Mount Sterling now stands, in which the

Indians were victorious. In this battle, Estill, who commanded

the whites, and nearly all of his officers, were killed. Near

the Blue Licks another battle was soon afterwards fought with

Captain Holder, in which the whites were again defeated; in

both these last mentioned battles the contending foe were

Wyandottes. … Peace was made with Great Britain in 1783, and

hostilities ceased; hostilities with the Indians also for a

time seemed suspended, but were soon renewed with greater

violence than ever. During the cessation of hostilities with

the Indians, settlements in Kentucky advanced rapidly. … As

early as 1784 the people of Kentucky became strongly impressed

with the necessity of the organization of a regular

government, and gaining admission into the Union as a separate

and independent State; but their efforts were continually

perplexed and baffled for the space of eight years before

their desire was fully accomplished. And though they were

often tempted by Spain with the richest gifts of fortune if

she would declare herself an independent State, and although

the Congress of the Confederated States continually turned a

deaf ear to her reiterated complaints and grievances, and

repulsed her in every effort to obtain constitutional

independence, she maintained to the last the highest respect

for law and order, and the most unswerving affection for the

Government. … With the view to admission into the Union as

an independent State, there were elected and held nine

Conventions in Kentucky within the space of eight years."

_W. B. Allen,

History of Kentucky,

chapters 2-3._

ALSO IN:

_J. M. Brown,

Political Beginnings of Kentucky._

{1941}

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1778-1779.

Conquest of the Northwest by the Virginian General Clark, and

its annexation to the Kentucky District.

See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

A. D. 1778-1779 CLARK'S CONQUEST.

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1781-1784.

Conflicting territorial claims of Virginia and New York and

their cession to the United States.

See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1781-1786.

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1785-1800.

The question of the free navigation of the Mississippi.

Discontent of the settlers.

Intrigues of Wilkinson.

See LOUISIANA: A. D. 1785-1800.

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1789-1792.

Separation from Virginia and admission to the Union as a

State.

"In the last days of the Continental Congress, Virginia, after

some struggles, having reluctantly consented to her

organization on that condition as an independent state,

Kentucky had applied to that body for admission into the

confederacy. That application had been referred to the new

federal government about to be organized, a delay which had

made it necessary to recommence proceedings anew; for the

Virginia Assembly had fixed a limitation of time, which, being

over-past, drove back the separatists to the original

starting-point. On a new application to the Virginia

Legislature, a new act had authorized a new Convention, being

the third held on that subject: to take the question of

separating into consideration. But this act had imposed some

new terms not at all agreeable to the Kentuckians, of which

the principal was the assumption by the new state of a portion

of the Virginia debt, on the ground of expenses incurred by

recent expeditions against the Indians. The Convention which

met under this act proceeded no further than to vote a

memorial to the Virginia Legislature requesting the same terms

formerly offered. That request was granted, and a fourth

Convention was authorized again to consider the question of

separation, and, should that measure be still persisted in, to

fix the day when it should take place. Having met during the

last summer [1790], this Convention had voted unanimously in

favor of separation; had fixed the first day of June, 1792, as

the time; and had authorized the meeting of a fifth Convention

to frame a state Constitution. In anticipation of these

results, an act of Congress was, now passed [February 4, 1791]

admitting Kentucky into the Union from and after the day above

mentioned, not only without any inspection of the state

Constitution, but before any such Constitution had been

actually formed." In the Constitution subsequently framed for

the new state of Kentucky, by the Convention appointed as

above, an article on the subject of slavery "provided that the

Legislature should have no power to pass laws for the

emancipation of slaves without the consent of their owners,

nor without paying therefor, previous to such emancipation, a

full equivalent in money; nor laws to prevent immigrants from

bringing with them persons deemed slaves by the laws of anyone

of the United States, so long as any persons of like age and

description should be continued in slavery by the laws of

Kentucky. But laws might be passed prohibiting the

introduction of slaves for the purpose of sale, and also laws

to oblige the owners of slaves to treat them with humanity."

_R. Hildreth,

History of the United States,

volume 4, chapters 3-4._

ALSO IN:

_J. M. Brown,

The Political Beginnings of Kentucky._

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1790-1795.

War with the Indian tribes of the Northwest.

Disastrous expeditions of Harmar and St. Clair, and Wayne's

decisive victory.

See NORTHWEST TERRITORY: A. D. 1790-1795.

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1798.

The Nullifying resolutions.

See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1798.

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1861 (January-September).

The struggle with Secession and its defeat.

"Neutrality" ended.

"In the days when personal leadership was more than it can

ever be again, while South Carolina was listening to the

teachings of John C. Calhoun, which led her to try the

experiment of secession, Kentucky was following Henry Clay,

who, though a slave-holder, was a strong Unionist. The

practical effect was seen when the crisis came, after he had

been in his grave nine years. Governor Beriah Magoffin

convened the Legislature in January, 1861, and asked it to

organize the militia, buy muskets, and put the State in a

condition of armed neutrality; all of which it refused to do.

After the fall of Fort Sumter he called the Legislature

together again, evidently hoping that the popular excitement

would bring them over to his scheme. But the utmost that could

be accomplished was the passage of a resolution by the lower

house (May 16) declaring that Kentucky should occupy 'a

position of strict neutrality,' and approving his refusal to

furnish troops for the National army. Thereupon he issued a

proclamation (May 20) in which he 'notified and warned all

other States, separate or united, especially the United and

Confederate States, that I solemnly forbid any movement upon

Kentucky soil.' But two days later the Legislature repudiated

this interpretation of neutrality, and passed a series of acts

intended to prevent any scheme of secession that might be

formed. It appropriated $1,000,000 for arms and ammunition,

but placed the disbursement of the money and control of the

arms in the hands of Commissioners that were all Union men. It

amended the militia law so as to require the State Guards to

take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States,

and finally the Senate passed a resolution declaring that

'Kentucky will not sever connection with the National

Government, nor take up arms with either belligerent party.'

Lovell H. Rousseau (afterward a gallant General in the

National service), speaking in his place in the Senate, said:

'The politicians are having their day; the people will yet

have theirs. I have an abiding confidence in the right, and I

know that this secession movement is all wrong. There is not a

single substantial reason for it; our Government had never

oppressed us with a feather's weight.' The Rev. Robert J.

Breckinridge and other prominent citizens took a similar

stand, and a new Legislature, chosen in August, presented a

Union majority of three to one.

{1942}

As a last resort, Governor Magoffin addressed a letter to

President Lincoln, requesting that Kentucky's neutrality be

respected and the National forces removed from the State. Mr.

Lincoln, in refusing his request, courteously reminded him

that the force consisted exclusively of Kentuckians, and told

him that he had not met any Kentuckian except himself and the

messengers that brought his letter who wanted it removed. To

strengthen the first argument, Robert Anderson, of Fort Sumter

fame, who was a citizen of Kentucky, was made a General and

given the command in the State in September. Two months later,

a secession convention met at Russellville, in the southern

part of the State, organized a provisional government, and

sent a full delegation to the Confederate Congress at

Richmond, who found no difficulty in being admitted to seats

in that body. Being now firmly supported by the new

Legislature, the National Government began to arrest prominent

Kentuckians who still advocated secession, whereupon others,

including ex-Vice-President John C. Breckinridge, fled

southward and entered the service of the Confederacy. Kentucky

as a State was saved to the Union, but the line of separation

was drawn between her citizens, and she contributed to the

ranks of both the great contending armies."

_R. Johnson,

Short History of the War of Secession,

chapter 5._

ALSO IN:

_N. S. Shaler,

Kentucky,

chapter 15._

_E. P. Thompson,

History of First Kentucky Brigade,

chapter 2._

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1861 (April).

Governor Magoffin's reply to President Lincoln's call for

troops.

See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1861 (APRIL).

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1862 (January-February).

Expulsion of Confederate armies along the whole line.

See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1862

(JANUARY-FEBRUARY: KENTUCKY—TENNESSEE).

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1862 (August-October).

Bragg's invasion.

Buell's pursuit.

Battle of Perryville.

See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

A. D. 1862 (JUNE-OCTOBER: TENNESSEE-KENTUCKY).

KENTUCKY: A. D. 1863 (July).

John Morgan's Raid.

See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

A. D. 1863 (JULY: KENTUCKY).

----------KENTUCKY: End----------

KENTUCKY RESOLUTIONS, The.

See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1798.

KENYER-MESÖ, Battle of (1479).

See HUNGARY: A. D. 1471-1487.

KERAÏT, The.

See PRESTER JOHN, THE KINGDOM OF.

KERAMEIKOS, The.

See CERAMICUS OF ATHENS.

KERBELA, The Moslem tragedy at.

See MAHOMETAN CONQUEST: A. D. 680.

KERESAN FAMILY, The.

See AMERICAN ABORIGINES: KERESAN FAMILY.

KERESTES, OR CERESTES, Battle of (1596).

See HUNGARY: A. D. 1595-1606.

KERMENT, Battle of (1664).

See HUNGARY: A. D. 1660-1664.

History for ready reference, Volume 3, Greece to Nibelungen · 第 289 / 676 题