He had been a great benefactor to numerous public charities. The funds

of the Foundling Hospital were improved through him with the amazing

sum of £10,299. The organ in its chapel, and the MS. score of his

“Messiah,” were a present and a donation to the foundation from him. He

left an amiable private as well as a good public character behind him.

His character as a composer is too well appreciated by the British

public to require any remarks from our feeble and inharmonious pen.

SEALING-WAX, SEALS, &c.

Besides metals, five other mediums are enumerated by ancient

writers, wherewith letters and public acts were sealed, viz., _terra

sigillaris_, cement, paste, common wax and sealing-wax. That the

terra sigillaris was used by the Egyptians, we have the evidence of

Herodotus, and which, by inference, is strengthened by that of Moses

who speaks of seal-rings or signets, whence we may safely infer, that

they had a medium of some sort, wherewith they sealed. This _lacuna_

Herodotus supplies, affirming it in direct terms, and assigning a name

to the substance they used for that purpose.

This circumstance was only rendered questionable by Pliny, who alleges

the Egyptians did not use those things.

Herodotus thus expresses himself: “The Egyptian priest bound to the

horns of cattle fit for sacrifice pieces of papyrus with sealing-earth,

on which they made an impression with the seal; and such cattle could

only be offered up as victims.”

Lucian speaks of a fortune-teller who ordered those who came to consult

him, to write down on a bit of paper the questions they wished to ask,

to fold it up, and seal it with clay, or any other substance of a like

kind.

Such earth appears to have been employed in sealing, by the Byzantyne

emperors; for we are told that, at the second Nicene Council, image

worship was defended by one saying, “No one believed that those who

received written orders from the Emperor, and venerated the seal,

worshipped on that account the sealing-earth, the paper, or the lead.”

Cicero relates that Verres, having seen in the hands of his servants

a letter written to his son from Agrimentum, and observing on it an

impression in sealing-earth, he was so pleased with it that he caused

the seal-ring with which it was made to be taken from the possessor.

Also, the same orator, in his defence of Flaccus, produced an

attestation sent from Asia, and proved its authenticity by its being

sealed with Asiatic sealing-earth; with which, he told the judges,

all public and private letters in Asia were sealed: and he showed on

the other hand, that the testimony brought by the accuser was false,

because it was sealed with _wax_, and for that reason could not have

come from Asia. The scholiast Servius relates, that a sybil received a

promise from Apollo, that she should live as long as she did not see

the earth of the island of the Erythræa, where she resided; that she

therefore quitted the place, and retired to Cumae, where she became old

and decrepid; but that having received a letter sealed with Erythræn

earth, when she saw the seal, she instantly expired.

No one, however, will suppose that this earth was used without

preparation, as was that to which is given the name of _creta_ chalk;

for, if it was of a natural kind, it must have been of that kind

called _potter’s clay_, as that clay is susceptible of receiving an

impression, and of retaining it subsequent to hardening by drying. It

is believed that the Romans, under the indefinite term _creta_, often

understood to be a kind of potter’s earth, which can be proved by many

passages in their numerous writers. Columella speaks of a species

of chalk of which wine-jars and dishes were made, of which kind it

is conjectured Virgil speaks when he calls it adhesive. The ancient

writers on agriculture give precisely the same name to marl, which was

employed to manure land: now, both chalk and marl, in their natural

state, are extremely inapplicable to the purpose for which we are led

to believe the _terra sigillaris_ was used; therefore, admitting the

Roman _creta_ was composed of them, those substances must naturally

have undergone some laborious process, in order to render them proper

for the purpose to which they were applied.

Notwithstanding none can feel a higher respect for Professor Beckmann,

to whom we are indebted for many of the preceding observations, than we

do, yet strongly as we are influenced with this impression, we cannot

help observing, consistent with that duty we owe to the public, that we

cannot divest ourselves of the opinion that he is only trifling with

the public feeling, perhaps for the ostentatious display of his own

learning: so many objections of so little weight are raised, that he

really appears to write for the purpose of raising new objections to

passages, which, in our comprehension, are extremely simple. We cannot

help applying to him a passage which occurs in a song of the Swan of

Twickenham, who sings:--

“Gnawed his pen, then dashed it on the ground,

Striking from thought to thought, a vast profound.

Plunged for the sense, but found no bottom there,

Yet wrote, and floundered on in mere despair.”

We would not be illiberal or capricious, nor do we presume to any extra

portion of intelligence; yet, we think we can in a few words discuss

the topic, and perhaps, satisfactorily, on which he has employed so

many pages. Those terms which have troubled the professor with learned

difficulties really appear to us susceptible of an easy interpretation,

and applicable to both or either of the senses in which they are

used, as are any words in the language of ancient Rome. Accordingly,

we find the term _creta_ implies either chalk, fuller’s clay, loam,

white paint, or Asiatic earth, termed creta Asiatica; and, in brief it

appears a mere generic name for any kind of earth, raised from below

the surface of the soil: this is its true sense. But there cannot be a

question, from what is known of the preparation of clay and earth for

_terra cotta_ and other plastic purposes, which undergo a variety of

washings, kneadings, &c., that similar preparations were requisite,

in order to bring it to so curious, so delicate a purpose as that to

which the terra sagillaris was applied. And _fosse_, in the sense used

by Varre, admits of nearly a similar description, it appearing as a

pronomen for the same thing; and indicates either peat, marl, loam,

chalk, or any earthy substance which may be raised from below the

terrestrial surface.

We have evidence every day in our fruit shops, that in certain

countries this kind of earth is yet employed for closing up jars of

dried fruits brought from Oporto, Smyrna, and other countries; as these

appear to be composed of white chalk of a texture somewhat similar to

common mortar. The warmth of the atmosphere, where it is used, soon

hardens and prevents the passage of air to the contents; the jars

themselves being oftentimes only dried in the sun.

Thus it appears that prepared earths were first used for the purpose

of sealing; their adhesive, or, as Virgil has it, their tenacious

qualities, being wonderfully improved for manual labour. Next, paste

was employed, prepared from dough.

To paste succeeded common wax, sometimes slightly tinctured with a

green tint, the effect of endeavouring to give it a blue colour, as

vegetable blues turn green by the process of heat employed in melting;

whilst mineral or earthy blues all sink to the bottom, from superior

gravity. This was the material employed in sealing public acts in

England, as early as the fifteenth century. We have an anecdote of the

Duke of Lancaster having no seal to ratify a deed between him and the

Duke of Burgoyne, but from what appears in the attestation, which, with

the instrument itself, according to the general custom of the day, runs

in rhyme thus:

“I, John of Gaunt,

Doe gyve and do graunt,

To John of Burgoyne

And the heire of his loyne

Sutton and Putton

Untill the world’s rotten.”

The attestation runs thus:

“There being no seal within the roof,

In sooth, I seal it wyth my tooth.”

A good example is this of the simple brevity of the time, and a severe

lecture upon the eternal repetitions of our modern lawyers, whereby the

limitations and special uses of deeds are made, perhaps, not according

to the necessities of the case, but are lengthened from selfish

purposes.

The Great Charter, which gives an assurance of the rights of

Englishmen, is sealed with white wax; as may be seen in the British

Museum.

The first arms used as a seal in England, were those of the tyrannical

subjugator of English rights, William, commonly called the Conqueror,

and they were brought from Normandy.

Although Fenn, in his collection of original Letters of the last half

of the fifteenth century, published in London, 1787, has given the size

and shape of the seals, he does not apprise us of what substance they

were composed. Respecting a letter of 1455, he says only, that “the

seal is of red wax,” by which, it is presumed, he means common wax; and

though, perhaps not equal in quality to such as is now used, yet it was

made of nearly similar materials. Tavernier, in his Travels, says, that

in Surat gum-lac is melted and formed into sticks, like sealing-wax.

Wecker also gives directions to make an impression with calcined gypsum

and a solution of gum or isinglass. Porta, likewise, knew that this

might be done, and, perhaps, to greater perfection with amalgam of

quicksilver.

Among the records of the Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel, are some letters of

1563, sealed with red and black wax. In the family of the Rhingrave,

Philip Francis von Daun, the oldest letter sealed with wax, known in

Germany, is found, of the date of August 3, 1554; it was written from

London, by an agent of that family, of the name of Gerrard Herman. The

colour of the wax is dark red, and very shining.

The oldest recipe known in Germany for making sealing-wax, was found

by M. Von Murr, in a work by Samuel Zimmerman, citizen of Augsburg,

published in 1759. The copy in the library of the university of

Gottingen is signed by the author himself.--“To make hard sealing-wax,

called Spanish wax, with which, if letters be sealed, they cannot be

opened without breaking the seal; take beautiful clear resin, the

whitest you can procure, and melt it over a slow coal fire. When it is

properly melted, take it from the fire, and for every pound of resin,

add two ounces of cinnabar, pounded very fine, stirring it about. Then

let the whole cool, or pour it into cold water. Thus you will have

beautiful red sealing-wax.

“If you are desirous of having black wax, add lamp-black to it. With

smalt or azure, you may make blue: with white-lead, white; and with

orpiment, yellow.

“If, instead of resin, you melt purified turpentine in a glass vessel,

and give it any colour you choose, you will have a harder kind of

sealing-wax, and not so brittle as the former.”

It may be remarked, that in these recipes for the fabrication of

sealing-wax there is no mention of gum-lac, which is known at present

as a chief ingredient in the composition of this article.

Zimmerman’s sealing-wax approaches very near to the quality of that

known as _maltha_, whence we may conclude, that the manufacture of it

did not originally come from the East Indies. The most ancient mention

of sealing-wax occurs in a botanical work, treating of the history of

aromatics and simples, by Garcia ab Horto, published at Antwerp in

1563, where the author, speaking of gum-lac says, that those sticks

used for sealing letters are made of it; at which time sealing-wax was

common among the Portuguese, and has since been manufactured chiefly in

Holland.

M. Spiess, principal keeper of the Records at Plessenberg, says,

respecting the antiquity of _Wafers_, in Germany, that the most

ancient use of them he has known, occurs in a letter written by D.

Krapf, at Spires, in 1624, to the government of Bayreuth.--The same

authority informs us that some years after, the Brandenburg factor at

Nuremberg sent such wafers to a bailiff, at Osternohe. During the whole

of the seventeenth century, wafers were not used in the Chancery at

Brandenburg, and only by private persons there.

Seals, it appears, from certain passages of Egyptian history, parallel

with, and perhaps anterior to the Israelitish ingress, were formed or

cut in emeralds, the native produce of that country. Other precious

stones, metals, steel, lead, and a variety of materials, but chiefly of

a hard and precious kind, have been always employed for that purpose.

BLACK-LEAD PENCILS.

The period when this semi-metallic substance was introduced, for

the purpose for which it is now applied, cannot with certainty be

ascertained, as no record is found of the transaction: by the common

expedient of inference, however, we certainly may conclude, it was in

very remote ages; for transcribers of MSS. upwards of one thousand

years ago, used a substance somewhat resembling it in effect.

But, perhaps, the antiquity of the use of black-lead pencils cannot

be so well determined from diplomatiques, as their frequency might

be proved from mineralogical writers. The first mention of this

discovery occurs in the works of Gesner, who, in his “Book of

Fossils,” published in 1565, says that the British people had pencils

for writing, with wooden-handles inclosing a piece of lead, which he

believed to be an artificial composition; and it was called _stimmi

Anglicanum_; which seems to import that it was a British production;

and we should consider, from the name of British antimony being given

to it, that it might have been Cumberland black-lead.

About thirty years afterwards, Cæsalpinus gave a more perfect account

of it:--he says it was a lead-coloured, shining stone, as smooth as

glass, and appeared as if rubbed over with oil; it gave to the fingers

an ash-grey tint, with a plumbeous brightness; and, he adds, pointed

pencils were made of it, for the use of painters and draughtsmen. A

closer description of the substance than this cannot be discovered.

Somewhere about three years afterwards, a still more perfect

description was furnished by Imperatis; who says, “It is much more

convenient for drawing than pen and ink, because the marks made with

it appear distinct upon a white ground, also, in consequence of

its brightness, show themselves on black, and can be preserved or

rubbed out at pleasure. This mineral is smooth, appears greasy to the

touch, and has a leaden-colour, which it communicates with a metallic

brightness. It can resist, for a long time, the strongest fire, and

even from it requires more hardness; it has, in consequence, been

thought to be a species of _talc_. This, in the arts to which it

is applied, is a property which greatly enhanceth its value, being

manufactured into crucibles, &c., with clay. These vessels are capable

of enduring the strongest heat of a chemical furnace.”

Sometimes this lead is foliaceous, and may be crumbled into small

pieces or scales; but frequently found denser and more strong. This

latter is what writing pencils should be made of; but the former being

more frequently found, and, also, coming from the refuse of the

workmen, is too often mixed up with some glutinous substance, and there

is every reason to suppose it to be enclosed in the groove in a plastic

state; these pencils are commonly hawked about our streets by pedlars

and Jews; of purchasing which people should be cautious, as they are,

in general, utterly worthless.

Robinson, in his Essay towards a natural History of Westmoreland and

Cumberland states, that, at first, the country people round Keswick

marked their sheep with black-lead. Afterwards, they discovered the

art of employing it in their earthenware, and also to preserve iron

from rust. The same writer says, the Dutch use it in dyeing, to render

black more durable; and that they buy it in large quantities for that

purpose. But their application of it for dyeing, we should consider as

highly questionable.

The mode of eradicating black-lead by means of an elastic gum, called

caoutchouc, or, Indian-rubber, was, we have been informed, first

discovered in England somewhere about sixty years ago.

COLOURED GLASS.

The manufacture of glass we find was quite common in Ethiopia, Syria,

Assyria, and other Eastern countries, in the earliest ages of the

world, as Diodorus Siculus informs us, who says, the Ethiopians

enclosed in glass, the bodies of their parents and friends; we

doubt, however, that on this point, the historian was deceived. But

it really appears probable that soon after the art of making glass

was discovered, the idea of communicating to it some colours would

easily present itself. This probability appears increased, when it

is recollected that much care is requisite to render glass perfectly

colourless. As the various metallic particles with which stone and

sand abound, (these being the chief ingredients of which glass is

composed, and which gradually give tints in fusion,) will almost

unavoidably communicate some hue or other, therefore the perfection of

glass is to have it perfectly colourless.

But with respect to coloured glass; so frequently have people been

imposed upon by having coloured glass sold to them for valuable stones,

that some conscientious authors have very laudably and carefully

abstained from lending the benefit of instruction in its manufacture,

by publishing the method.

The Egyptian artists were so famous in the manufacture of glass, that

the Romans were content to receive this article from the glass-houses

in Alexandria, and did not interfere in endeavouring to procure the art

themselves, until the latter part of the empire.

We read that an Egyptian priest made a present to the Emperor Adrian

of several beautiful glass cups, which sparkled with many colours; and

such value did that august personage place upon these toys, that he

ordered them to be used only on high feasts and solemnities.

Strabo relates, that a glass manufacturer of Alexandria informed him

that an earth was found in Egypt, without which the valuable coloured

glass could not be made. It has been thought by some, the glass earth

here meant was a mineral alkali which was readily found in Egypt,

serving to make glass; but this author speaking expressly of coloured

glass, it has been suggested as probable, the alkali above named could

not have reference to what the artisan intended to imply, but that it

must be referred to some metallic earth or manganese.

One Democritus is named by Seneca, as having discovered an art of

making artificial emeralds; but it has been conjectured that what the

philosopher meant was the art of communicating colour to natural

rock crystal, or colouring glass already made, so as to resemble

stones, which is a process performed by cementation. Directions have

been furnished for this purpose by Porta, Neri, and others; but it is

discovered that the articles so coloured are liable to such accidents

in the process, that it is next to impossible to render things of any

size tolerably perfect, so as to bear cutting afterwards.

In the Museum Victorium at Rome, there are shown a chrysolite and an

emerald, both perfectly well executed, and thoroughly transparent,

without a blemish.

We have not from the ancients an account of what process they employed;

but it must be evident that nothing less than metallic calces could

have been used; and for this evident reason, that any other substance

could not have resisted the influence of the necessary heat. The last

century has, however, produced certain artists in northern European

nations, who have adopted a method of employing the precious metals, to

communicate a tincture to glass in the process of making, where iron,

&c. were originally only used; and their endeavours have been attended

with singular success.

By means of an amalgam of gold, or a solution in _aqua regia_, and

precipitated with a solution of tin, the metal then assuming the

appearance of a rich purple coloured powder; so prepared, it is mixed

with the best _frit_, and then called the precipitate or gold calx of

Cassius, the inventor of gold purple, or mineral purple.

This precipitate communicates a rich ruby coloured purple, so perfect

that it is impossible to discover the deception, without the substances

be tried by the usual means--cut with a diamond or a prepared file.

We have had in England some very eminent artists in the practice of

staining glass, and also for making artificial representations of

various precious stones.

Although the professed object of alchemy has now met with that

contempt it merited--because, notwithstanding the immense sums which

have been expended, the time lost, and unprofitable labour employed

in the unavailing search after what probably never will be found--yet

the labour lost and money expended has not been totally useless, since

it has served to open the seals which secured chemical science to the

modern world; and which is the chief, if not the sole advantage it can

claim over antiquity for superiority of information.

Painting on glass, but, perhaps, staining had been a more appropriate

expression, or, properly speaking, in enamel, with the preparations

for colouring in mosaic work, may, to a certain extent, be justly

considered as branches of the art of colouring glass; in all which

there is no colour more difficult to be attained than a beautiful red;

it now is, and ever has been, most difficult, consequently the dearest

colour. The presumed ignorance of ancient artists in preparing this

colour has afforded some reason, it is said, to suppose the ancients

knew of no other substance proper for that purpose but calx of iron,

or manganese. To this we may reply, many specimens are found which

show they were not so ignorant in that art, and that it is more than

probable the same jealousy which is found to exist in modern days among

artizans might prevent our sagacious predecessors from publishing the

secrets of their respective professions to the world. We contend, that

as the materials must then have had existence, which have been since so

successfully employed, pray what was the reason the ancients should not

avail themselves of their benefit? In all the higher speculations of

science and arts, where the great and superior energies of genius were

requisite, this perfection in the ancients far surpassed any exertions

which have been since achieved by the moderns. To instance one artist

and one art solely, we name the great Praxiteles, so famous in the art

of statuary, whose works were a model of perfection.

ETCHING ON GLASS AND GLASS CUTTING.

Without entering into the history of the lapidary’s art, we only

propose to speak of those things which ancient and modern authors have

said upon the art of engraving on glass, observing, that it was an art

anciently known to both the Greeks and Romans; although it appears

extremely probable, that from their expressed ignorance of many of

those properties which modern chemistry has discovered to belong to

matter, they were ignorant of the art of etching on glass.

From antique specimens still preserved, a doubt cannot for a moment

be suffered to exist on our minds, but that the art of engraving upon

glass was familiar to the Greek artists, who formed upon glass both

linear figures, and in relievo, by the same means as are now employed

for nearly the same purpose, if we can place any confidence in an able

and learned lapidary, Natter, who has established, that the ancients

employed the same kind of instruments for this purpose, or nearly such

as are now in use; abating, perhaps the use of diamonds, and the dust

of that precious material, for which it is conceived they used emery

powder, and the dust of glass.

From what is related by Pliny, it certainly appears that they used the

lapidary’s wheel, an instrument moving in a horizontal direction over

the work-table.

A Historical Account of Useful Inventions and Scientific Discoveries Being a manual of instruction and entertainment. · 第 17 / 18 段