Not that Venice was perfect; her citizens made their mistakes; there

were the jealous and the covetous, and there were conspiracies within

her borders as well as without. Her doges were not all, like Caesar's

wife, "above suspicion," her counsellors were not all like Fra Paolo

nor all her scholars like Aldo. But there was no apathy and there _was_

a nucleus of impersonal, united effort sufficiently vitalized to hold

back the agencies of disintegration during century after century of

steady upward effort. And then the Wheel of Destiny turned and the

Venice of Sarpi passed.

But the days to dawn will again see Venice whirled upward into the

light on the rim of this mighty Wheel. This is inevitable. It is

Theosophical teaching. The old clans will gather--and _there_--and they

will work again and aspire again and build again; and in the light of

the lessons learned through the failures and successes of the past will

rise again to greater heights.

Doge and counsellor, artist and craftsman, scientist and scholar,

statesman, philosopher, and poet--as the "whirling wheel of spiritual

will and power" brought to you great opportunities in the past, so will

it bring them to you again and yet again, in the future.

[Illustration: Lomaland Photo. and Engraving Dept. THE DUCAL PALACE,

VENICE IN THE FOREGROUND THE LION OF ST. MARK'S]

[Illustration: Lomaland Photo. and Engraving Dept. COURTYARD OF THE

DUCAL PALACE]

[Illustration: Lomaland Photo. and Engraving Dept. BRIDGE OF THE RIALTO]

[Illustration: Lomaland Photo. and Engraving Dept. PONTE DEI

SOSPIRI--THE BRIDGE OF SIGHS, VENICE]

HUMANITY AND THEOSOPHICAL EDUCATION: by Elizabeth C. Spalding

Had our modern philosophers studied, instead of sneering at, the old

Books of Wisdom--they would have found that which would have unveiled

to them many a secret of ancient church and state. As they have not

the result is evident. The dark cycle of Kali-Yug has brought back

a Babel of modern thought, compared with which the "confusion of

tongues" itself, appears a harmony.--_H. P. Blavatsky_

To the placid minds of one part of humanity the idea that there is

an imperious need for Humanity to be saved, may seem quite absurd.

To them the world appears to be moving on well enough; children are

born to them, and are trained in the same methods they were, and their

ancestors before them for centuries, possibly; life passes smoothly

along, so they ask in wonder, Why change?

On the other hand is noticeable amongst a large class, a great unrest,

a fretting against established conditions, and a reaching out for

something new. Individuals striving with different motives, but massing

together into various societies, and associations, united in the

purpose of breaking down the old, but with no ideals upon which to form

new and better ones. It is like building an edifice on shifting sands.

This vague but extreme restlessness is permeating every race and

country. Is it not pitiful that with such an expenditure of force,

there should be a lack of the right understanding to lead men and

women out of all their difficulties, discouragements, and adverse

conditions, to the correct solution of life's problems? Truly the

world is harvesting a chaotic mass of thought that unless checked,

will tend rapidly towards degeneracy, and the disintegration of all

things. We need a clearer and cleaner atmosphere mentally, morally, and

physically, and to secure this the minds of people must be opened to

the truth.

Theosophy offers to humanity this knowledge, and shows the way

to restore balance and harmony. These few words convey a simple

declaration of the truth, but a world of meaning lies in them.

Down through the ages has this touch of wisdom been kept burning in the

hearts of a few. Great Teachers passing its light to their pupils, they

in their turn to others, thus forming a noble and devoted band. They

held the knowledge as a sacred trust awaiting the time to come, when

humanity could receive these truths, without crucifying the great Souls

who revealed to them the teachings.

H. P. Blavatsky had the key to this knowledge, the "Secret Archaic

Doctrine" in other words "Theosophy," which she brought to the western

world. In _Isis Unveiled_, written thirty-three years ago, she wrote:

The said key must be turned seven times before the whole system is

divulged. We will give it but one turn, and thereby allow the profane

one glimpse into the mystery. Happy he who understands the whole.

In her book, _The Secret Doctrine_, which followed later, she gave out

much more information. So little did the world then understand her

that she was considered a charlatan by some. But others did recognize

that a Teacher had come, and they gathered around her. She appointed

Wm. Q. Judge, another Teacher, as her successor, to carry on the work

she had created, the Theosophical Society. He, in his turn, appointed

Katherine Tingley, the present Leader of the Universal Brotherhood

and Theosophical Society, who is electrifying the world with her

educational work in different countries.

Katherine Tingley is now making practical the true Theosophical

education.

What is a Theosophical education?

"Man Know Thyself," was one of the most valued teachings of the

ancients. To know that one is a compound being, spiritual, mental, and

physical; to know that this trinity also makes man a dual being; that

he has both the potentiality of the God, and the lower forces as well;

to learn how to conquer the evil that the God may prevail, and the soul

be liberated to become the living power in him for good. All this is

but a part of what Theosophy teaches.

Socrates asked "Which of us is skilful or successful in the treatment

of the Soul, and which of us has had good teachers?" If that question

were asked today Katherine Tingley's students could answer, here, at

Point Loma, and her various centers throughout the world. Consider

what it means to a child, to enter upon life's path favored with an

understanding of these truths, imparted to him in such a simple,

practical, logical manner that he lives naturally from the beginning,

the proper life. "The first shoot of every living thing is by far the

greatest and fullest." Such a child has the right foundation on which

to build; he is truly educated.

The physical has not been strengthened at a loss of the mental and

spiritual; the intellectual has not been so abnormally developed that

the intuitional and spiritual have been absolutely shut off. The

Theosophical education gives a gradual unfolding of the whole nature,

from within, outwards. Its growth may be likened to the ripening of the

Lotus seed into the pure, white perfect blossom. The soul of the child

who has developed under this training (making due allowance for Karmic

heredity) will look forth, when matured, upon the world with so clear

a vision, that confusion of ideas will be to him an unknown quantity.

He can more clearly detect right from wrong--the necessary from the

unnecessary, the practical from the unpractical--the true brotherhood

from the selfish independence. In fact he will restore equilibrium, and

always for humanity's welfare.

Theosophy has been a revelation to the women. Women as a rule cling

to old established forms and conventionalities, some from fear of

varying kinds, others from ignorance, or a lack of desire to take

the initiative, owing to an inertia which the habits and customs of

centuries have bred in them. It is mainly because of the manifold

possibilities which have been dormant so long in woman that she feels

the impelling urge to do something now, perhaps more than ever before.

In her effort to respond, she sometimes strikes an extreme note which

results in making the whole tide of life about her, of which she should

be the harmonious center, stormy and discordant. Without the spiritual

thread of knowledge how can she act wisely? Yet woman is responsible to

a large degree for the unsettled condition that the minds of men are in

today, and she always will carry a heavy responsibility, because she is

the matrix of humanity.

One of our best-known American cartoonists has pictured the condition

of the world, as a large globe held in a woman's hand. Consider what a

power for good woman has in her position of motherhood, which must of

course embrace wifehood. Words cannot depict all the fine possibilities

and capabilities of mother-love. It has been said that great men have

great mothers, and if we trace the life and thought of the mother prior

to the child's birth, we can invariably find a clue which explains the

strength, or weaknesses of the child.

Are not the majority of humanity simply drifting? Men and women

growing apart, the seeds of separateness and consequent disintegration

being sown, instead of their growing together into the nobler, fuller

comradeship which Theosophy encourages.

As Katherine Tingley has said:

We want not only the hearts, but the divine fire, the divine life,

and the splendid royal warriorship of men and women. Theosophy is the

panacea.

[Illustration: THE SCREEN OF TIME]

BOOK REVIEWS: "Commentary upon the Maya-Tzental Perez Codex" (William

E. Gates) by C. J. Ryan

The Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology at Harvard

University recently published a new _Paper_ (Vol. VI, No. 1) on the

subject of Central American hieroglyph writing. The _Paper_ is entitled

"_Commentary upon the Maya-Tzental Perez Codex_, with a concluding

_Note upon the Linguistic Problem of the Maya Glyphs_." Professor

Wm. E. Gates, International Theosophical Headquarters, Point Loma,

the author, has been a member of the Theosophical Society for about

twenty-five years, beginning the serious study of Theosophy during

H. P. Blavatsky's lifetime. Later, an ardent supporter of William Q.

Judge, he is now one of the most active workers at Point Loma under the

direction of Katherine Tingley. Professor Gates has applied himself

largely to the historical and ethnological side of H. P. Blavatsky's

teachings, and, by a careful study of her _Secret Doctrine_ and other

works, he has been able to bring to the problem of ancient American

culture a fund of information and many valuable clues not familiar

to the average student of archaeology. Professor F. W. Putnam of the

Peabody Museum, Harvard, in his prefatory note to the _Commentary_,

says:

The Museum is fortunate in adding to its collaborators Mr. William

E. Gates, of Point Loma, California, who for more than ten years has

been an earnest student of American hieroglyphs. From his life-long

studies in linguistics in connexion with his research in "the motifs

of civilizations and cultures" he comes well-equipped to take up the

difficult and all-absorbing study of American hieroglyphic writing.

Mr. Gates has materially advanced this study by his reproduction

of the glyphs in type. These type-forms he has used first in his

reproduction of the Codex Perez, and now in this Commentary they are

used for the first time in printing. This important aid to the study

will be highly appreciated by all students of American hieroglyphs, as

it will greatly facilitate the presentation of the results of future

research.

The Harvard _Papers_ are taken by the principal Universities and

learned societies throughout the world. The Commentary on the Perez

Codex and the reproduction of it have been printed by the Aryan Press

at Point Loma and are fine examples of the highest class of printing.

[Illustration: A PAGE OF THE MAYA-TZENTAL PEREZ CODEX FROM CENTRAL

AMERICA]

[Illustration: PEREZ CODEX: PAGE 17]

The Perez Codex itself, of which Professor Gates' _Commentary_ treats,

and of which he has just issued a new, definitive edition, redrawn,

colored as in the original and slightly restored, is a Central American

manuscript on specially coated "maguey" paper, of unknown antiquity.

It was discovered about fifty years ago in a forgotten chimney corner

of the Bibliothèque Impériale, Paris, black with dust and without

record of its antecedents. It is but a fragment, but fortunately

the twenty-two remaining pages contain several chapters complete. The

artistic quality of the work is of a high order; the coloring is most

harmonious and the drawing of the hieroglyphs firm and refined. The

human figures in the accompanying illustrations are conventionalized

in certain grotesque though evidently intentional ways, but they have

character and a real dignity, and admirably fit the spaces alloted

to them. As an example of decorative art the manuscript must take

high rank. It irresistibly reminds one of the best Egyptian Papyri.

Professor Gates says:

And when, ... one advances to an appreciation of the work in its

bearings as a whole, one has to acknowledge himself facing the

production of craftsmen who had the inheritance of not only

generations, but ages of training. Such a combination of complete

mastery in composition, perfect control of definite and fixed forms,

and hand technique, can grow up from barbarism in no few hundred

years.... Had we nothing but the Perez Codex and Stela P at Copan, the

merits of their execution alone, weighed simply in comparison with

observed history elsewhere, would prove that we have to do not with

the traces of an ephemeral, but with the remains of a wide-spread,

settled race and civilization, worthy to be ranked with or beyond even

such as the Roman, in its endurance, development and influence in the

world, and the beginnings of whose culture are still totally unknown.

As to the Codex before us, we can only imagine what the beauty,

especially of the pages we now come to discuss, must have been when

the whole was fresh and perfect.

But, alas, no one can yet read the meaning of this and the two

other Maya Codices that have escaped the destructive hands of the

over-zealous Spanish missionaries who saw nothing in such things but

hindrances to the spreading of the "True Faith," yet at the time of the

Conquest they could be read easily by the cultured natives, and the

_language is still spoken_! Though it seems almost incredible, there is

no living person known who can decipher any of the hieroglyphs on the

manuscripts or the hundreds of stone monuments except a few calendar

signs and other signs of little consequence. We are indebted to Don

Diego Landa, second bishop of Yucatan, for the destruction of all the

manuscripts he could find, but it is to him also that we owe some

gratitude for preserving the meaning of the hieroglyphs of the days and

the months and a few other signs, which he inserted in his book. The

little he has given us is not enough to help much; we may have to await

the discovery of some "Rosetta Stone" like that which opened the lost

secret of the Egyptian sacred writings to Champollion. In Professor

Gates' words:

Up to date our knowledge of the meanings of the glyphs is still to all

intents and purposes limited to the direct tradition we have through

Landa, and the deductions immediately involved in these. We know the

day and month signs, the numbers, including 0 and 20, four units

of the archaic calendar count (the day, tun, katun and cycle), the

cardinal point signs, the negative particle. We have not fully solved

the uinal or month sign, which seems to be chuen on the monuments and

a cauac, or chuen, in the manuscripts. We are able to identify what

must be regarded as metaphysical or esoteric applications of certain

glyphs in certain places, such as the face numerals. But every one of

these points is either deducible directly by necessary mathematical

calculation, or else from the names of certain signs given by Landa

in his day and month list, and then found in other combinations, such

as _yax_, _kin_, etc. That we have as many of the points as we have,

and still cannot form from them the key--that we cannot read the

glyphs--is a constant wonder; but a fact nevertheless.

A large portion of the _Commentary_ is devoted to a highly technical,

detailed and closely-reasoned examination and analysis of the glyphs

and illustrations in the Codex, of interest chiefly to specialists, but

a considerable space is given to some general conclusions on language

which are highly significant to students of Theosophy.

There is one point from which this question of American origins, at

least of American place in human society and civilization, can be

studied in its broader lines, even with what materials we have. It is

that of language in general. From one point of view language is man

himself, and it certainly is civilization. Without it man is not man,

a Self-expressing and social being.... It is the constant effort of

the conscious self to formulate thought. It is the use of the energy

of creation, of objectivation, a veritable many-colored rainbow bridge

between the inner or higher man and the outer or lower worlds. And

it is not only the expression of Man as man, but in its varied forms

it is the inevitable and living expression of each man or body of

men at any and every point of time. Itself boundless as an ocean,

it is in its infinite forms and streams and colors and sounds, the

faithful and exact exponent both of the sources and channels by which

it has come, and of the banks in which it is held, racial, national or

individual.... Every word or form comes to us with the thought-impress

of every man or nation that has used or molded it before us. We must

take it as it comes, but we give it something of ourselves as we pass

it on. If our intellectual and spiritual thought is aflame, whether as

nation or individual, we may purify it, energize it, give it power to

form and arrange the atoms around it--and we have a new literature,

a new and beneficent, creative social vehicle of intercourse, mutual

understanding, and human unification....

It is evident that the criterion of the perfectness of any language

is not to be found in a comparison of its forms or methods with those

of any other, but in its fitness as a vehicle for the expression of

deeper life, of the best and greatest that is in those who use it, and

above all in its ability to react and stimulate newer and yet greater

mental and spiritual activity and expression. The force behind man,

demanding expression through him, and him only, into the human life of

all, is infinite--of necessity infinite. There is no limit, nor ever

has been any limit, to what man may bring down into the dignifying,

broadening and enriching of human life and evolution, save in his own

ability to comprehend, express, and live it. And the brightness and

cleanness of the tools whereby he formulates his thought, as well as

the worthiness and fitness of the substance and the forms into which

he shapes it for others to see, are the essentials of his craft....

There is one great broad line that divides the nations and

civilizations of the earth, past and present, in all their arts of

expression. We may call it that of the ideographic as against the

literal. It controls the inner form of language and of languages; it

manifests in the passage of thought from man to man; it determines

whether the writing of the people shall be hieroglyphic or alphabetic;

it gives both life and form to the ideals of their art. It is a

distinction that was clearly recognized by Wilhelm von Humboldt,

when he laid down that the incorporative characteristic essential to

all the American languages is the result of the exaltation of the

imaginative over the ratiocinative elements of mind.

Ideographic writing directs the mind of the reader by means of a

picture or a symbol directly to the idea existing in the mind of the

one who uses it; while alphabetic or literal writing is simply the

written expression of the sound, and only indirectly expresses the idea.

Passing on from the culture of ancient America with its ideographs, the

writer draws attention to the great transition of thought, as indicated

by language, that took place in Central Asia probably, the supposed

seat of the Aryan beginnings after the destruction of Atlantis and the

general break-up of the former civilizations. He says:

I believe ... that coincident with a new and universal world-epoch, as

wide in its cultural scope as the difference between the ideographic

and literal, there was finally formed a totally new vehicle for

the use of human thought, the inflectional, literal, alphabetic.

That this vehicle was perfected into some great speech, the direct

ancestor of Sanskrit, into the _forms_ of which were concentrated

all the old power of the ancient hieroglyphs and their underlying

concepts. For Sanskrit, while the oldest is also the mightiest of

Aryan grammars; and no one who has studied its forms, or heard

its speech from educated native mouths, can call it anything but

concentrated spiritual power. That the force which went on the one

hand into the Sanskrit forms, was on the other perpetuated on into

the special genius of Chinese, in which, as we know it, we have a

retarded survival, not of course of outer form so much as of method

and essence. And in Tibetan, in spite of all that is said to the

contrary, I suspect that we have a derivative, not from either Chinese

or Sanskrit as we know them, but by a medial line from a common point.

Many students feel convinced that once we solve the problem of the

Maya-Tzental manuscripts and carved inscriptions, which undoubtedly

relate to enormous periods of time, we shall have conclusive evidences

of the civilization and destruction of Atlantis. Several illuminating

quotations from H. P. Blavatsky's _Secret Doctrine_ are given by

Professor Gates, and in his last paragraph he sums up the results

of his long application to the study of ancient American and other

languages, in which he has been so notably helped by the teachings of

Theosophy, in these words:

And I am convinced that the widest door there is to be opened to

this past of the human race, is that of the Maya glyphs. The narrow

limitations of our mental horizon as to the greatness and dignity of

man, of his past, and of human evolution, were set back widely by

Egypt and what she has had to show, and again by the Sanskrit; but the

walls are still there, and advances, however rapid, are but gradual.

With the reading of America I believe the walls themselves will fall,

and a new conception of past history will come.

A NEW MAGAZINE

Translation of an article that appeared in the Gothenburg paper

_Göteborgs Handels- och Sjöfarts Tidning_ for August 23, 1911, written

by the literary and dramatic critic of the paper, J. Atterbom.

THE first number of a new international magazine which seems worthy of

recognition is now out in a Swedish edition. The publication is called

_Den Teosofiska Vägen_ (_The Theosophical Path_) and the ultimate

direction is in the hands of Katherine Tingley, the Leader of the

international Theosophical Movement. The editor of the Swedish edition

is Dr. Gustaf Zander, Stockholm.

This monthly magazine is intended to continue, on a broader scale, the

work of the former magazine _Theosophia_, which has been published

for a good many years. The interest in Theosophy has grown steadily

of late, not only in our country but in all civilized countries. And

the more attention the Theosophical Movement has attracted through

its propaganda and educational activities, the more the need has been

felt of a publication which, instead of devoting most of its space to

theoretical Theosophy and the deeper teachings of its philosophy suited

to advanced students, would serve primarily to enlighten and inform

all genuine seekers of Truth upon the essential character of this

Theosophical Movement throughout the world, and indicate _the path_

along which its workers are trying to make Theosophy a living power in

the world's life, as well as in the daily life of each of them.

The Theosophical Path Illustrated Monthly Volume 1, July-December, 1911 · 第 40 / 49 段