The house at which we visited, realized in every way one's ideal

of what an old plantation home should be. It is an immense square

building with double galleries, tall white columns and green shutters;

it faces the Mississippi, which, however, cannot be seen from the

ground floor on account of the levee. The architecture is of engaging

simplicity--four large rooms, each exactly twenty-five feet square,

upstairs and down, with a hall eighteen feet wide between. At the

rear is a long wing, perhaps a later addition, with the inevitable

and delightful gallery around it. The house contains many treasures

of beautiful antique workmanship and mementos of a by-gone time. Our

hostess pointed with pride to an immense pair of glass candle shields,

about two feet high, which had belonged to her grandmother. They stood

on each side of the mantelpiece, over tall silver candlesticks, whose

flame they could protect from all possible draughts. We slept in a high

four-poster bed, with a canopy, lined with red pleated cloth, like the

inside of a mushroom, which would have done credit to a lady of the

ancient régime.

Though the sugar-making season was over on our host's plantation, he

took us to one in the neighborhood that was still in operation. The

equipment was of the most up-to-date kind--great iron claws to rake the

cane from the cars to a sort of traveling trough, called a conveyor,

which carries it up to the chopper: from whence it travels through

several crushers until all the juice is squeezed out and the remaining

pulp is as dry as tinder. This is carried off to be used as fuel or

fertilizer. The cane juice goes from one boiling vat to another, being

purified with lime and sulphur, and refined again and again, smelling

more and more delicious at every stage of its progress. We watched the

syrup being changed to sugar by a very interesting centrifugal process,

and then shaken into barrels. Two barrels at a time were placed upon

metal plates, and by means of an electric current, were made to dance

gaily, shaking down the sugar as it fell until it was firmly packed.

It was an absurd sight, and the writer was reminded at once of dancing

furniture at a spiritualistic séance. We were surprised to learn that

one-third of the ground has to be planted in corn to supply the stock;

the crops are rotated so as to allow sugar-cane for two successive

years, then corn the third, etc.

Our host and hostess and their family were true types of southern

hospitality. The occasion of our visit was a wedding, and the old house

was crowded to its utmost capacity, with new guests arriving on every

train. Yet there was no stir of nervous excitement: everything moved

with a tranquil gaiety, and we felt a delightful sense of informality

as if we were a part of the household. Perhaps the strongest

sense-impression which remains with the writer, is the memory of waking

in the early morning and looking out, at the dawn-flushed sky beyond

the white pillars of the verandah and the gray Spanish moss draping the

live-oak trees. That tender, peaceful moment, full of color and soft

brightness, seemed to seal upon the mind something of the poetry and

the romance of the old South.

THE LORELEI: by a Student-Traveler

Just where the river Rhine narrows and inclines, making a drop of

five feet which causes the water to flow more swiftly, towers the

Rock of the Lorelei, four hundred and fifty feet high and nearly

perpendicular, at the base of which sunken rocks form a whirlpool in

the rapidly flowing stream. At the top of the high rock in olden days,

so the legend runs, a maiden sat and sang, and as she sang she combed

her golden hair. And her song was so full of magic that boatmen on

the river below, falling under the spell of her enchantment, as they

listened to the song, forgot the dangers of the whirling waters and

were dashed to pieces on the sunken rocks underneath.

Is the tale of the Lorelei a mere poetical personification of the

whirlpool and rocks? If so, how account for the tale being universal?

Who does not know the story of Ulysses and the Sirens? Virgil's Harpies

had the faces of maidens, but ended in foul feathers and talons. And

so with many another destructive enchantress in ancient myth. People

seem to have loved to trace out in the topography of their native land

its analogies with that internal region wherein the Soul goes its

pilgrimage. In every land there were sacred mountains, healing founts,

caves of the Sibyl, rocks of the Lorelei, etc. The eternal drama of the

human Soul has been allegorized again and again, always with the same

features, though the topography is changed to suit the race and time.

Every man knows the luring enchantress, for who has not been seduced

by the captivating charms of promised pleasure, only to be mocked and

punished?

And why these cheating experiences of the Soul? Are they the chiding

hand of a God or the mocking malice of a fiend; or are we the sport

of a Chance whose utter indifference outclasses alike the wrath of

deity and the malice of devil? The answer is a commonsense one. Life

is not a cradle of down nor a pleasure-garden. It is a drama full of

incident, an enterprise full of adventure, a world full of people.

In it we find the helper and the adversary; and if there are sirens

and wicked giants, there are also the meed of victory, the bride won,

the warrior's home-coming. Life is worth while, for the triumphs it

contains; and it is because we aspire to the triumphs that we engage in

the fights, though our lower nature, the mere varlet, may cry out at

the discomfort. The Dragon, once defeated, becomes our ally.

If we would win beauty and truth, we must not seek in them mere balm

for the senses, but rise in our strength and be worthy of them. What is

worth having is not to be had for the taking.

Beauty rhymes with duty.

Truth rhymes with ruth.

Tarry not in the pleasure grounds of sense, heed not the sweet voices

of illusion, thou who aspirest to wisdom--say the ancient teachings.

It is the illusion produced by the senses and desires that we have to

overcome, if we would not be dashed on the rocks of the Lorelei.

LORELEI

(Heinrich Heine)

Ich weisz nicht was soll es bedeuten

Dass ich so traurig bin,

Ein Märchen von alten Zeiten

Das kommt mir nicht aus dem Sinn.

Die Luft ist kühl und es dunkelt

Und ruhig flieszt der Rhein,

Der Gipfel des Berges funkelt

Im Abendsonnenschein.

Die schönste Jungfrau sitzet

Dort oben wunderbar,

Ihr gold'nes Geschmeide blitzet,

Sie kämmt ihr goldenes Haar;

Sie kämmt es mit goldenem Kamme

Und singt ein Lied dabei

Das hat eine wundersame

Gewaltige Melodei.

Den Schiffer im kleinen Schiffe

Ergreift es mit wildem Weh'

Er sieht nicht die Felsenriffe

Er schaut nur hinauf in die Höh'.

Ich glaube die Wellen verschlingen

Am Ende Schiffer und Kahn,

Und das hat mit ihrem Singen

Die Lorelei gethan.

[Illustration: Lomaland Photo. and Engraving Dept. THE ROCK OF THE

LORELEI]

[Illustration: Lomaland Photo. and Engraving Dept. THE WESTERN

FOUR-TOED SALAMANDER (_Batrachoseps attenuatus_)]

THE WESTERN FOUR-TOED SALAMANDER: by Percy Leonard

The Batrachians occupy a place between the reptiles proper and the

fishes. They are distinguished from the fishes by the possession of

paired limbs furnished with four fingers and a thumb, and though

their early days are passed beneath the water, breathing like fishes

through their gills, yet when fully grown, almost without exception

they breathe through well-developed lungs. There is a superficial

resemblance between the reptilian lizard and the batrachian newt or

salamander, and they are often confounded together in the popular mind.

True reptiles, however, are easily distinguished from batrachians by

their overlapping scales, quite different from the smooth moist skins

of the latter. Reptiles breathe as we do by expanding the ribs and

drawing the air into the hollow thus formed; but batrachians, lacking

ribs, are obliged to swallow their air, and a glance at a toad or a

salamander will reveal the incessant palpitation of the throat as the

air is forced into the lungs. Reptiles are hatched, or born, as the

case may be, perfect copies in miniature of their parents and never go

through the tadpole stage. Batrachians are divided into two groups: the

Salientia (or Jumpers), and the Urodela. The Salientia (or Jumpers)

comprise the frogs and toads; and the Urodela include the numerous

tribes of newts, water-dogs, efts, and salamanders.

The illustration shows one of the lowliest of the order of Urodela, the

western four-toed salamander (_Batrachoseps attenuatus_). The legs are

ridiculously small in comparison to the long, unwieldy body. That the

tail is fat and cylindrical is only to be expected, because being a

terrestrial salamander, it has no need of a flat tail for swimming like

the water-haunting newts. Probably the bulky tail serves as a store

of nourishment in reserve for use in time of famine, as does the hump

of a camel under similar circumstances. Here at Point Loma these odd

creatures may be found under stones in the damp cañons. In the absence

of pools they cannot pass through the tadpole stage under water and so

the various phases of tadpole transformation are gone through while

in the egg. The males are glossy black; but the female figured in the

picture has a light brown skin with irregular blotches of flesh color

on the tail.

A male once captured by the writer exhibited a curious case of mimicry.

He coiled up just like a rattlesnake and looked so venomous and

threatening as to inspire terror in anyone who was unaware of his utter

powerlessness to do an injury.

The abnormal humidity of the air enables this delicate animal to

survive the rainless months of summer, and probably he never ventures

from his shelter till the sun goes down and the dew provides a little

moisture. The mere contact of his skin with a dewy surface would

probably be as refreshing as a draught of water to a thirsty man; but

the salamander, like the frog, does not drink: he simply "blots up" his

water through the skin.

Thus the four-toed western salamander passes his uneventful days

and nights. His pleasures are few and simple and his sorrows

correspondingly light.

According to Theosophy, the inner Essence of every creature in this

broad universe either is, was, or prepares to become, man; but the mind

staggers in the attempt to conceive the enormous stretches of time

before such dull, inert, insensitive beings will arrive at the human

stage. But pain is a grand stimulant and spur to advance, and perchance

when the salamander gets eaten by a snake or a stoat, he gains as

compensation for the pangs of death some slight promotion to a higher

order of batrachians in his next rebirth! So mote it be.

THE REAL MAN: by H. Coryn, M. D., M. R. C. S.

"Now we know the real man," is the usual comment when some heretofore

respectable citizen is convicted of forgery and sent to jail: "_Now_ we

know his real character."

Do we?

A fire breaks out in the prison and the forger reveals himself a hero,

risking life without a second's hesitation for the rescue of his jailer

or fellow-prisoners.

Do we _now_ know his "real character"?

Later on, his confinement, throwing him in upon himself, provides

opportunity for the manifestation of a marked vein of poetry, and from

his prison he issues a volume which at once takes high rank in the

literature of the day.

Some will now put away their _moral_ standard of measurement, produce

another, and remark that the "real man" after all turns out to have

been a poet.

You can photograph half of a man's face, right or left, throw the

picture over upon itself and get a whole face composed of two lefts,

and another of two rights--often quite different.

We judge character in that way, taking any one aspect of it upon which

we choose to dwell or which alone we see, and of that one constructing

a whole. Thus the same man viewed by various knowers of him is a

philosopher, a sharp lawyer, a skilful amateur actor, or an ever-ready

helper and friend in times of trouble or perplexity. To his cook he may

be solely a grumbler, and to his son at school a supply-machine whose

crank is not always easy to turn.

To come back to the prisoner. The "respectable citizen" was evidently

not the whole of him. Under stress he revealed the weakness and

dishonesty which led to the forgery. Environment, the temptation,

brought them to the surface. We need not say that his character

changed. Nevertheless, as we all know, a change of character is

possible--so thorough that after emergence from prison no stress of

temptation and no assurance from discovery would provoke another theft.

On the other hand we cannot conceive of his change from a hero into a

coward, nor hardly of his loss of the poetic vein. Environment--the

fire and the conditions of prison life--brought those traits out too.

But, once out they are out.

Being in search of the essence of character, the _really_ "real man,"

we cannot accept anything which may vanish or be surmounted, nothing

which in the normal course of individual evolution, gone far enough,

will for certain be surmounted. No man is essentially a thief, but he

may be essentially a hero or a poet or both.

Consider the question in the light of evolution, the evolution of each

of us. We sometimes make imaginary pictures of the ripened humanity

of the far future, a noble flower of which there are as yet but

indications of the bud. Let us add another touch. Let us recognize in

that far humanity, however godlike, _ourselves_. Many, many births and

lifetimes and deaths lie between this and that for all of us. But the

lines of continuity are unbroken. It is we ourselves who shall be that

splendid and radiant humanity. The evolution of the human race means

the evolution of the present members of the human race. We shall "meet

each other in heaven" because we are always children of the earth that

will _be_ that heaven.

We note that some qualities, such as a tendency to theft, have every

encouragement to vanish. Sooner or later, in one or another lifetime,

they bring about so much disgrace and pain or are found so incompatible

with an ever increasing love of right and inner peace, that they are

cast out and away, are outgrown and done with. The last dirty fiber is

ripped out of the ever perfecting pattern.

On the other hand the germs of some other qualities will have a

constant and in the long run irresistible tendency to grow, root and

branch.

Shall we say "real character" of traits destined to grow or of those

destined to disappear? So far we only use the words of so much as

we can see of a man: a poor enough application. We talk of the

"respectable citizen," and behold a thief. In the next change the thief

"turns out to be a hero"; and whilst we are admiring the hero we are

invited to read a volume of poetry.

We had better restrict the words "real character" to that which time

shall at last unveil and develop, to the permanent germs and their

ripened product; not to the spores and fungi which, however noticeable

now, will sometime be entirely cleaned away. _There is no thief; there

are men who thieve_--at present, but who will cease to do so. There

_are_ poets and heroes; for these men will not only not cease to create

and do, but will create and do more and more worthily as they go

forward through time to the great light. There are some men whom _no_

stress of temptation would force into theft. Are there any men in whom

_no_ circumstances would evoke some smallest gleam of heroism?

Still we are not clear about real character. For there some qualities,

for example courage and love of the race and sensitiveness to the

supernal light, which time will perfect in _all_ men. We must put

aside all the elements, however splendid, in whose possession men will

_resemble_ each other and seek for what will be peculiar to each.

Within the unity of essence, apart from common sensitiveness to the

great light, there will be essential diversity. And it is to this

finally appearing individuality, this uniqueness of each, that the

words "real character" properly belong. In a few men only has this germ

of true individuality yet achieved much manifestation.

The end of man, said Carlyle, is not a thought, were it the noblest,

but a deed.

The aphorism cries aloud for completion. What sort of a deed would

be that which had no thought behind it? The end of man is a deed

faithfully manifesting a worthy "thought," and the mere writing down

of a thought is often its sufficient and only possible manifestation.

Even the careful nurture of a thought may be a deed. The universe is

the ideation of the divine getting itself written down on the face of

substance. Man's entire business is to aid that, to make manifest as

much of the divine, the light, as he can come at or get aware of in

his inner conscience or consciousness. If he constantly tries to live

in that way, the divine will presently take turns and come at _him_.

Inspiration is the final reward of aspiration. But the light has a

separate and special ray or aspect of itself in store for each man, so

that the _whole_ of it can only shine through _all_ men.

There is a part of the divine essence unborn as yet into the world,

unmanifest. And there is a part of it which men and gods have wrought

into the manifest, each according to his nature and comprehension of

his duty. From the highest to the lowest departments of human life this

way of work is possible, to search out duty and do it.

But "duty" has here a very full meaning. The soul of the Beethoven

searches, and is illumined by, the divine essence, _whatever his name

for it or thought of it_. Then he renders it or manifests it for the

world. The craftsman might search it as he designed a wall-paper; he

who did so, who worked that he might manifest it for men, would find

his invention grow ever richer and readier. The divine has no _one_

kind of manifestation or inspiration. The mother might search it to

learn the highest ways of conduct with her children, not even waiting

for their birth; and their souls would in time show her what she had

done for them. The gardener might thus work among his flowers and would

find in them a new responsiveness. There is no one who has not some

work which can be fruitfully done in this spirit of bringing forth for

the world. This use of will in no metaphoric sense is the real magic.

When all men and women work in this way the world will begin to be for

the first time an expression of the divine plan, governed--through them

and of their will and choice--by the divine. By that time work will

have been raised to its highest terms and there will be modes of work

as inconceivable to us now as the work of Beethoven to a savage. Each

of us will have found _his_ work--that is, will have found that aspect

of the divine which he is uniquely constituted to deliver forth to the

rest. No one can be spared. All will need all the others. All will

stand unveiled as artists, creators, or showers-forth or thinkers-out

of something good and necessary for the work of their fellows. We have

ourselves made life dark and work monotonous, stifled the latent or

nascent craftsman or thinker in ourselves and the others, and created

forms of work that should never have been to do at all. Now we must

live them through and be thankful that some few, the thinkers, the

musicians, the poets, the artists, have in some sort broken through

into a corner of their heritage and can serve us and lighten our lives

and make the day nearer when we too can break through.

Here then is what we may mean by "real character." It is the veiled

creator or shower-forth. No man is what he seems. He is waiting for

his own nature, and the divine in nature is waiting for him, to give

him the ray he alone can transmit. Neither Händel nor Beethoven could

have given us the music of the other; and the music of both was made

possible by every bit of divine-serving and divine-revealing work that

was ever done since man began. That principle holds throughout, in

small and great. The humblest work, if it have one ray of the divine

put into it, helps the whole world for all time to come. And no work

need lack that ray, no life need lack such work.

REVIEWS

"Life of Leonardo da Vinci" by Professor Osvald Sirén

by Carolus

We have just received another important work from the indefatigable and

accomplished pen of Professor Osvald Sirén, PH. D., of the Stockholm

University. It is a study of Leonardo da Vinci's life and work, a

most complete and thorough monograph of 468 pages, magnificently

illustrated by hundreds of full-page and smaller reproductions, the

majority taken from Leonardo's pictures, sketches and diagrams; the

rest are mostly from the works of other painters which throw light upon

the special points discussed; there are also some pleasing views of

places referred to. The first edition consists of 700 numbered copies,

beautifully printed on thick paper, and is in all respects but one a

perfect example of what such a book should be; the one thing lacking

is an index to the subject-matter and illustrations. This can easily

be remedied in the next edition, for there is no doubt that another

will immediately be called for, as the work will be invaluable to all

lovers of art who wish to read the latest and most complete analysis of

Leonardo's career and to learn the results of the most recent research.

This edition is, of course, written in Swedish, but we understand that

in response to the demand, it will soon appear in other languages, and

so be made accessible to a much larger public. Dr. Sirén has spent a

long time in Italy and elsewhere studying everything connected with

Leonardo and his contemporaries, and this volume is largely the result

of his original researches. It has been very favorably received by the

most competent Swedish critics.

The monograph is founded upon a series of lectures lately given in

the University of Stockholm (in which Dr. Sirén occupies the chair

of Art-history) and it has been the author's aim to show the great

master as he appears in his works and writings, with as little of the

"personal equation" of the writer visible as possible--to make Leonardo

tell his own story--but at the same time, one cannot help feeling and

approving of the warm glow of appreciation which inspires every word

Dr. Sirén writes about his hero. His admiration for the master seems

to have influenced his style, for there is a greater simplicity and

clearness, and a more easy flow of words and sentences than we have

observed in previous works from his able pen.

The book is arranged in four main sections. The first consists of

extracts from the famous Italian art-historian, Vasari's almost

contemporary life of Leonardo, translated into Swedish and freely

commented upon and greatly expanded by Dr. Sirén. Many illustrations

are given showing Leonardo's extraordinary knowledge of mechanics,

engineering, architecture, fortification, anatomy, etc. Dr. Sirén

finally demolishes one of our pet illusions, i. e., that Leonardo died

in the arms of Francis I of France, by showing that King Francis was

at St. Germain-en-Laye, attending the birth of a son, at the moment

when Leonardo was breathing his last at Cloux in Touraine. It appears

this was one of Vasari's occasional "decorations of the truth" for the

sake of picturesqueness. Another myth was that Leonardo prostrated

himself at the feet of the church at his last hour with tears and

cries of repentance for the independence of thought for which he

had consistently stood. In this connexion it is noteworthy that he

studiously avoided introducing halos or nimbuses round the figures in

his religious pictures! Neither is there more than one example of the

cross in any of his undoubted works, and that may have been added by

another hand afterwards. His object was plainly to accentuate the

simple human and natural side in everything that he touched. Even the

head of the Christ in _The Last Supper_ has no radiance; the Teacher

is painted just as he might have been seen by ordinary vision. The

distinction of Leonardo's sacred figures depends upon the superior

beauty and majesty of expression and bearing. This was a very daring

innovation on Leonardo's part.

The second portion of Dr. Sirén's learned volume treats of Leonardo's

pictures and sculptures in more detail; his scientific work is

sufficiently dealt with in the earlier part of the volume, for after

all, his fame depends mainly upon his standing as an artist. Special

chapters are devoted, respectively, to the work of his youth: _The

Adoration of the Magi_, the _Madonna among the Rocks_, _The Last

Supper_, _The Battle of the Standard_, _Leda and the Swan_, _John the

Baptist_, _St. Anne_, and his studies for equestrian statues, etc.

The Theosophical Path Illustrated Monthly Volume 1, July-December, 1911 · 第 23 / 49 段