<b>THEVENIN, MARIE ANNE ROSALIE.</b> Medals at the Salons of 1849, 1859,

1861. Born at Lyons. Pupil of Leon Cogniet. Portrait and figure painter.

Among her pictures the following are noticeable: "Flora McIvor and Rose

Bradwardine," 1848; "Portrait of Abbé Jacquet," 1859; "Portrait of a

Lady," 1861.

<b>THOMAS-SOYER, MME. MATHILDE.</b> Honorable mention, 1880; third-class

medal, 1881; bronze medal, Exposition, 1889. Born at Troyes, 1859. Pupil

of Chapu and Cain. The principal works of this sculptor are: "A Russian

Horse"; "Lost Dogs"; "Russian Greyhounds"; "Huntsmen and a Poacher," in

the Museum of Semur; "Combat of Dogs," purchased by the Government; "Cow

and Calf," in the Museum of Nevers; "Stag and Bloodhound," in the Museum

of Troyes, etc.

At the Salon, Artistes Français, 1902, Mme. Thomas-Soyer exhibited "An

Irish Setter and a Laverock," and in 1903 "Under the White Squall."

<b>THORNYCROFT, MARY.</b> Born 1814; died 1895. Daughter of John Francis,

the sculptor, whose pupil she was. This artist exhibited at the Royal

Academy when very young. Her first important work was a life-size figure

called "The Flower-Girl." In 1840 she married Thomas Thornycroft, and

went to Rome two years later, spending a year in study there. Queen

Victoria, after her return, commissioned her to execute statues of the

royal children as the Four Seasons. These were much admired when

exhibited at the Academy. Later she made portrait statues and busts of

many members of the royal family, which were also seen at the Academy

Exhibition.

In his "Essays on Art," Palgrave wrote: "Sculpture has at no time

numbered many successful followers among women. We have, however, in Mrs.

Thornycroft, one such artist who, by some recent advance and by the

degrees of success which she has already reached, promises fairly for the

art. Some of this lady's busts have refinement and feeling."

<b>THURBER, CAROLINE NETTLETON.</b> Born in Oberlin, Ohio. Pupil of Howard

Helmick in Washington, and of Benjamin Constant and Jean Paul Laurens in

Paris.

In 1898 Mrs. Thurber took a studio in Paris, where her first work was the

portrait of a young violinist, which was exhibited in the Salon of the

following spring. This picture met with immediate favor with the public,

the art critics, and the press. The Duchess of Sutherland, upon seeing

it, sent for the artist and arranged for a portrait of her daughter,

which was painted the following autumn while Mrs. Thurber was a guest at

Dunrobin Castle. This portrait was subsequently exhibited in London and

Liverpool.

Mrs. Thurber has painted portraits of many persons of distinction in

Paris, among them one of Mlle. Ollivier, only daughter of Émile Ollivier,

president of the Académie Française. Monsieur Ollivier, in a personal

note to the artist, made the following comment upon the portrait of his

daughter: "How much I thank you for the portrait of my daughter; it

lives, so powerfully is it colored, and one is tempted to speak to it."

Mrs. Thurber is an exhibitor in the Salon, Royal Academy, and New

Gallery, London, and other foreign exhibitions, as well as in those of

this country.

She now has a studio in the family home at Bristol, Rhode Island, on

Narragansett Bay, where she works during half the year. In winter she

divides her time among the larger cities as her orders demand. While Mrs.

Thurber's name is well known through her special success in the

portraiture of children, she has painted many prominent men and women in

Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, Washington, and New England.

Among her later portraits are those of Mrs. James Sullivan, one of the

lady commissioners of the St. Louis Exposition; Lieut.-Gen. Nelson A.

Miles; Albert, son of Dr. Shaw, editor of the _Review of Reviews_; Mrs.

A. A. F. Johnston, former Dean of Oberlin College; Augustus S. Miller,

mayor of Providence; Hon. L. F. C. Garvin, governor of Rhode Island; and

Judge Austin Adams, late of the Supreme Court of Iowa.

<b>THURWANGER, FELICITÉ CHASTANIER.</b> This remarkable artist, not long

since, when eighty-four years old, sent to the exhibition at Nice--which

is, in a sense, a branch of the Paris Salon--three portraits which she

had just finished. "They were hung in the place of honor and unanimously

voted to belong to the first class."

Mme. Thurwanger was the pupil of Delacroix during five years. The master

unconsciously did his pupil an injury by saying to her father: "That

daughter of yours is wonderfully gifted, and if she were a man I would

make a great artist of her." Hearing this, the young artist burst into

tears, and her whole career was clouded by the thought that her sex

prevented her being a really great artist, and induced in her an abnormal

modesty. This occurred about forty-five years ago; since then we have

signally changed all that!

Delacroix, who was an enthusiast in color, was the leader of one school

of his time, and was opposed by Ingres, who was so wanting in this regard

that he was accused of being color-blind.

Mme. Thurwanger had a curious experience with these artists. When but

seventeen she was commissioned by the Government to copy a picture in the

Louvre. One morning, when she was working in the Gallery, Ingres passed

by and stopped to look at her picture. He examined it carefully, and with

an expression of satisfaction said: "I am so very glad to see that you

have the true idea of art! Remember always that there is no color in

Nature; the outline is all; if the outline is good, no matter about the

coloring, the picture will be good."

This story would favor the color-blind theory, as Ingres apparently saw

color neither in the original nor the copy.

An hour later Delacroix came to watch the work of his pupil, and after a

few minutes exclaimed: "I am so happy, my dear girl, to see that you have

the true and only spirit of art. Never forget that in Nature there is no

line, no outline; everything is color!"

In 1852 Mme. Thurwanger was in Philadelphia and remained more than two

years. She exhibited her pictures, which were favorably noticed by the

Philadelphia _Enquirer_. In July of the above year her portraits were

enthusiastically praised. "Not a lineament, not a feature, however

trivial, escapes the all-searching eye of the artist, who has the happy

faculty of causing the expression of the mind and soul to beam forth in

the life-like and speaking face."

In October, 1854, her picture of a "Madonna and Child" was thus noticed

by the same paper: "For brilliancy, animation, maternal solicitude, form,

grace, and feature, it would be difficult to imagine anything more

impressive. It is in every sense a gem of the pictorial art, while the

execution and finish are such as genius alone could inspire."

<b>TIRLINKS, LIEWENA.</b> Born in Bruges, a daughter of Master Simon. This

lady was not only esteemed as an artist in London, but she won the heart

of an English nobleman, to whom she was given in marriage by Henry VIII.

Her miniatures were much admired and greatly in fashion at the court.

Some critics have thought the Tirlinks to be the same person with Liewena

Bennings or Benic, whose story, as we know it, is much the same as the

above.

<b>TORMOCZY, BERTHA VON.</b> Diploma of honor, Budapest and Agram. Born at

Innspruck, 1846. Pupil of Hausch, Her, and Schindler. Among her pictures

are "Girl in the Garden," "Blossoming Meadows," "Autumn Morning," and a

variety of landscapes.

<b>TORO, PETRONELLA.</b> A painter of miniatures on ivory which have

attained distinction. Among those best known are the portraits of the

Prince of Carignano, Duke Amadeo, and the Duchess d'Aosta with the sons

of the Prince of Carignano. She has painted a young woman in an antique

dress and another in a modern costume. Her works are distinguished by

firmness of touch and great intelligence. She has executed some most

attractive landscapes.

<b>TREU, OR TREY, KATHARINA.</b> Born at Bamberg. 1742-1811. A successful

painter of flowers and still-life. Her talent was remarkable when but a

child, and her father, who was her only master, began her lessons when

she was ten years old. When still young she was appointed court painter

at Mannheim, and in 1776 was made a professor in the Academy at

Düsseldorf. Her pictures are in the Galleries of Bamberg and Carlsruhe,

and in the Darmstadt and Stuttgart Museums.

<b>URRUTIA DE URMENETA, ANA GERTRUDIS DE.</b> Member of the Academy of Fine

Arts, Cadiz, 1846. Born in Cadiz. 1812-1850. She began the study of

drawing with Javier, and after her marriage to Juan José de Urmeneta,

professor of painting and sculpture and director of the Cadiz Academy,

continued her work under his direction. A "St. Filomena" and

"Resurrection of the Body," exhibited in 1846, are among her best

pictures. Her "St. Jeronimo" is in the new cathedral at Cadiz, and the

Academy has shown respect to her memory by placing her portrait in the

room in which its sessions are held.

<b>VIANI, MARIA.</b> Born at Bologna. 1670-1711. I find no reliable

biographical account of this artist, whose name appears in the catalogue

of the Dresden Gallery as the painter of the "Reclining Venus, lying on a

blue cushion, with a Cupid at her side."

<b>VERELST, MARIAN.</b> Born in 1680. This artist belonged in Antwerp and

was of the celebrated artistic family of her name. She was a pupil of her

father, Hermann, and her uncle, Simon Verelst. She became famous for the

excellent likenesses she made and for the artistic qualities of her small

portraits.

Like so many other artists, she was distinguished for accomplishments

outside her art. She was a fine musician and a marvel in her aptitude in

acquiring both ancient and modern languages. A very interesting anecdote

is related of her, as follows: When in London, one evening at the theatre

she sat near six German gentlemen, who expressed their admiration of her

in the most flattering terms of their language, and at the same time

observed her so closely as to be extremely rude. The artist, in their own

tongue, remarked that such extravagant praise was the opposite of a

compliment. One of them repeated his words in Latin, when she again

replied in the same language. The strangers then asked her if she would

give them her name. This she did and further told them that she lived

with her uncle, Simon Verelst. In the end she painted the portrait of

each of these men, and the story of their experience proved the reason

for the acquaintance of the artist being sought by people of culture and

position. Walpole speaks in praise of her portraits and also mentions her

unusual attainments in languages.

<b>VIGÉE, MARIE LOUISE ELIZABETH.</b> Member of the French Academy. Born in

Paris in 1755. That happy writer and learned critic, M. Charles Blanc,

begins his account of her thus: "All the fairies gathered about the

cradle of Elizabeth Vigée, as for the birth of a little princess in the

kingdom of art. One gave her beauty, another genius; the fairy Gracious

offered her a pencil and a palette. The fairy of marriage, who had not

been summoned, told her, it is true, that she should wed M. Le Brun, the

expert in pictures--but for her consolation the fairy of travellers

promised her that she should bear from court to court, from academy to

academy, from Paris to Petersburg, and from Rome to London, her gayety,

her talent, and her easel--before which all the sovereigns of Europe and

all those whom genius had crowned should place themselves as subjects for

her brush."

[Illustration: A FRENCH PRINCE

MARIE VIGÉE LE BRUN]

It is difficult to write of Madame Le Brun in outline because her life

was so interesting in detail. Though she had many sorrows, there is a

halo of romance and a brilliancy of atmosphere about her which marks her

as a prominent woman of her day, and her autobiography is charming--it

is so alive that one forgets that she is not present, telling her story!

The father of this gifted daughter was an artist of moderate ability and

made portraits in pastel, which Elizabeth, in her "Souvenirs," speaks of

as good and thinks some of them worthy of comparison with those of the

famous Latour. M. Vigée was an agreeable man with much vivacity of

manner. His friends were numerous and he was able to present his daughter

to people whose acquaintance was of value to her. She was but twelve

years old at the time of his death, and he had already so encouraged her

talents as to make her future comparatively easy for her.

Elizabeth passed five years of her childhood in a convent, where she

constantly busied herself in sketching everything that she saw. She tells

of her intense pleasure in the use of her pencil, and says that her

passion for painting was innate and never grew less, but increased in

charm as she grew older. She claimed that it was a source of perpetual

youth, and that she owed to it her acquaintance and friendship with the

most delightful men and women of Europe.

While still a young girl, Mlle. Vigée studied under Briard, Doyen, and

Greuze, but Joseph Vernet advised her to study the works of Italian and

Flemish masters, and, above all, to study Nature for herself--to follow

no school or system. To this advice Mme. Le Brun attributed her success.

When sixteen years old she presented two portraits to the French

Academy, and was thus early brought to public notice.

When twenty-one she married M. Le Brun, of whom she speaks discreetly in

her story of her life, but it was well known that he was of dissipated

habits and did not hesitate to spend all that his wife could earn. When

she left France, thirteen years after her marriage, she had not so much

as twenty francs, although she had earned a million!

She painted portraits of many eminent people, and was esteemed as a

friend by men and women of culture and high position. The friendship

between the artist and Marie Antoinette was a sincere and deep affection

between two women, neither of whom remembered that one of them was a

queen. It was a great advantage to the artist to be thus intimately

associated with her sovereign lady. Even in the great state picture of

the Queen surrounded by her children, at Versailles, one realizes the

tenderness of the painter as she lovingly reproduced her friend.

Marie Antoinette desired that Mme. Le Brun should be elected to the

Academy; Vernet approved it, and an unusual honor was shown her in being

made an Academician before the completion of her reception picture. At

that time it was a great advantage to be a member of the Academy, as no

other artists were permitted to exhibit their works in the Salon of the

Beaux-Arts.

Mme. Le Brun had one habit with which she allowed nothing to interfere,

which was taking a rest after her work for the day was done. She called

it her "calm," and to it she attributed a large share of her power of

endurance, although it lost her many pleasures. She could not go out to

dinner or entertain at that hour. The evening was her only time for

social pleasures. But when one reads her "Souvenirs," and realizes how

many notable people she met in her studio and in evening society, it

scarcely seems necessary to regret that she could not dine out!

Mme. Le Brun was at one period thought to be very extravagant, and one of

her entertainments caused endless comments. Her own account of it shows

how greatly the cost was exaggerated. She writes that on one occasion she

invited twelve or fifteen friends to listen to her brother's reading

during her "calm." The poem read was the "Voyage du jeune Anacharsis en

Grèce," in which a dinner was described, and even the receipts for making

various sauces were given. The artist was seized with the idea of

improvising a Greek supper.

She summoned her cook and instructed her in what had been read. Among her

guests were several unusually pretty ladies, who attired themselves in

Greek costumes as nearly as the time permitted. Mme. Le Brun retained the

white blouse she wore at her work, adding a veil and a crown of flowers.

Her studio was rich in antique objects, and a dealer whom she knew loaned

her cups, vases, and lamps. All was arranged with the effect an artist

knows how to produce.

As the guests arrived Mme. Le Brun added here and there an element of

Grecian costume until their number was sufficient for an effective

_tableau vivant_. Her daughter and a little friend were dressed as pages

and bore antique vases. A canopy hung over the table, the guests were

posed in picturesque attitudes, and those who arrived later were arrested

at the door of the supper-room with surprise and delight.

It was as if they had been transported to another clime. A Greek song was

chanted to the accompaniment of a lyre, and when the honey, grapes, and

other dishes were served _à la Grecque_, the enchantment was complete.

The poet recited odes from Anacreon and all passed off delightfully.

The fame of this novel supper was spread over Paris, and marvellous tales

were told of its magnificence and its cost. Mme. Le Brun writes: "Some

ladies asked me to repeat this pleasantry. I refused for various reasons,

and several of them were disturbed by my refusal. Soon a report that the

supper had cost me twenty thousand francs was spread abroad. The King

spoke of it as a joke to the Marquis of Cubières, who fortunately had

been one of the guests and was able to convince His Majesty of the folly

of such a story. Nevertheless, the modest sum of twenty thousand at

Versailles became forty thousand at Rome; at Vienna the Baroness de

Strogonoff told me that I had spent sixty thousand francs for my Greek

supper; you know that at Petersburg the price at length was fixed at

eighty thousand francs, and the truth is that it cost me about fifteen

francs!"

Early in 1789, when the warnings of the horrors about to take place began

to be heard, Mme. Le Brun went to Italy. In each city that she visited

she was received with great kindness and many honors were shown her. In

Florence she was invited to paint her own portrait, to be hung in that

part of the Uffizi set apart for the portraits of famous painters. Later

she sent the well-known portrait, near that of Angelica Kauffman. It is

interesting to read Goethe's comparison of the two portraits.

Speaking of Angelica's first, he writes: "It has a truer tone in the

coloring, the position is more pleasing, and the whole exhibits more

correct taste and a higher spirit in art. But the work of Le Brun shows

more careful execution, has more vigor in the drawing, and more delicate

touches. It, has, moreover, a clear though somewhat exaggerated coloring.

The Frenchwoman understands the art of adornment--the headdress, the

hair, the folds of lace on the bosom, all are arranged with care and, as

one might say, _con amore_. The piquant, handsome face, with its lively

expression, its parted lips disclosing a row of pearly teeth, presents

itself to the beholder's gaze as if coquettishly challenging his

admiration, while the hand holds the pencil as in the act of drawing.

"The picture of Angelica, with head gently inclined and a soft,

intellectual melancholy pervading the countenance, evinces higher genius,

even if, in point of artistic skill, the preference should be given to

the other."

Mme. Le Brun found Rome delightful and declared that if she could forget

France she should be the happiest of women. She writes of her fellow

artist: "I have been to see Angelica Kauffman, whom I greatly desired to

know. I found her very interesting, apart from her fine talent, on

account of her mind and her general culture.... She has talked much with

me during the two evenings I have passed at her house. Her manner is

gentle; she is prodigiously learned, but has no enthusiasm, which,

considering my ignorance, has not electrified me.... I have seen several

of her works; her sketches please me more than her pictures, because they

are of a Titianesque color."

Mme. Le Brun received more commissions for portraits than she could find

time to paint in the three years she lived in Italy. She tells us: "Not

only did I find great pleasure in painting surrounded by so many

masterpieces, but it was also necessary for me to make another fortune. I

had not a hundred francs of income. Happily I had only to choose among

the grandest people the portraits which it pleased me to paint." Her

account of her experiences in Italy is very entertaining, but at last the

restlessness of the exile overcame her and impelled her to seek other

scenes. She went to Vienna and there remained three other years, making

many friends and painting industriously until the spirit of unrest drove

her to seek new diversions, and she went to Russia.

She was there received with great cordiality and remained six

years--years crowded with kindness, labor, honor, attainment, joy, and

sorrow. Her daughter was the one all-absorbing passion--at once the joy

and the grief of her life. She was so charming and so gifted as to

satisfy the critical requirements of her mother's desires. In Petersburg,

where the daughter was greatly admired and caressed, the artist found

herself a thousand times more happy than she had ever been in her own

triumphs.

Mme. Le Brun was so constantly occupied and the need of earning was so

great with her, that she was forced to confide her daughter to the care

of others when she made her début in society. Thus it happened that the

young girl met M. Nigris, whom she afterward married. Personally he was

not agreeable to Mme. Le Brun and his position was not satisfactory to

her. We can imagine her chagrin in accepting a son-in-law who even asked

her for money with which to go to church on his wedding-day! The whole

affair was most distasteful, and the marriage occurred at the time of the

death of Mme. Le Brun's mother. She speaks of it as a "time devoted to

tears."

Her health suffered so much from this sadness that she tried the benefit

of change of scene, and went to Moscow. Returning to Petersburg, she

determined--in spite of the remonstrances of her friends, and the

inducements offered her to remain--to go to France. She several times

interrupted her journey in order to paint portraits of persons who had

heard of her fame, and desired to have her pictures.

She reached Paris in 1801 and writes thus of her return: "I shall not

attempt to express my emotions when I was again upon the soil of France,

from which I had been absent twelve years. Fright, grief, joy possessed

me, each in turn, for all these entered into the thousand varying

sentiments which swept over my soul. I wept for the friends whom I had

lost upon the scaffold, but I was about to see again those who remained.

This France to which I returned had been the scene of atrocious crimes;

but this France was my Native Land!"

But the new régime was odious to the artist, and she found herself unable

to be at home, even in Paris. After a year she went to London, and

remained in England three years. She detested the climate and was not in

love with the people, but she found a compensation in the society of many

French families who had fled from France as she had done.

In 1804 Mme. Nigris was in Paris and her mother returned to see her. The

young woman was very beautiful and attractive, very fond of society,

entirely indifferent to her husband, and not always wise in the choice of

her companions. Mme. Le Brun, always hard at work and always having great

anxieties, at length found herself so broken in health, and so nervously

fatigued that she longed to be alone with Nature, and in 1808 she went to

Switzerland. Her letters written to the Countess Potocka at this time are

added to her "Souvenirs," and reveal the very best of her nature. Feeling

the need of continued repose, she bought a house at Louveciennes, where

she spent much time. In 1818 M. Le Brun died, and six years later the

deaths of her daughter and her brother left her with no near relative in

the world.

Women in the fine arts, from the Seventh Century B.C. to the Twentieth Century A.D. · 第 24 / 27 段