The pleasure with which William's parents observed the rapid development

of his intellectual powers was alloyed by apprehensions about his

health. He shot up alarmingly fast; he was often ill, and always weak;

and it was feared that it would be impossible to rear a stripling so

tall, so slender, and so feeble. Port wine was prescribed by his medical

advisers: and it is said that he was, at fourteen, accustomed to take

this agreeable physic in quantities which would, in our abstemious

age, be thought much more than sufficient for any full-grown man. This

regimen, though it would probably have killed ninety-nine boys out of

a hundred, seems to have been well suited to the peculiarities of

William's constitution; for at fifteen he ceased to be molested by

disease, and, though never a strong man, continued, during many years of

labour and anxiety, of nights passed in debate and of summers passed in

London, to be a tolerably healthy one. It was probably on account of the

delicacy of his frame that he was not educated like other boys of the

same rank. Almost all the eminent English statesmen and orators to whom

he was afterwards opposed or allied, North, Fox, Shelburne, Windham,

Grey, Wellesley, Grenville, Sheridan, Canning, went through the training

of great public schools. Lord Chatham had himself been a distinguished

Etonian: and it is seldom that a distinguished Etonian forgets his

obligations to Eton. But William's infirmities required a vigilance and

tenderness such as could be found only at home. He was therefore bred

under the paternal roof. His studies were superintended by a clergyman

named Wilson; and those studies, though often interrupted by illness,

were prosecuted with extraordinary success. Before the lad had completed

his fifteenth year, his knowledge both of the ancient languages and

of mathematics was such as very few men of eighteen then carried up to

college. He was therefore sent, towards the close of the year 1773,

to Pembroke Hall, in the university of Cambridge. So young a student

required much more than the ordinary care which a college tutor bestows

on undergraduates. The governor, to whom the direction of William's

academical life was confided, was a bachelor of arts named Pretyman, who

had been senior wrangler in the preceding year, and who, though not a

man of prepossessing appearance or brilliant parts, was eminently

acute and laborious, a sound scholar, and an excellent geometrician.

At Cambridge, Pretyman was, during more than two years, the inseparable

companion, and indeed almost the only companion of his pupil. A close

and lasting friendship sprang up between the pair. The disciple was

able, before he completed his twenty-eighth year, to make his preceptor

Bishop of Lincoln and Dean of St Paul's; and the preceptor showed

his gratitude by writing a life of the disciple, which enjoys the

distinction of being the worst biographical work of its size in the

world.

Pitt, till he graduated, had scarcely one acquaintance, attended chapel

regularly morning and evening, dined every day in hall, and never went

to a single evening party. At seventeen, he was admitted, after the bad

fashion of those times, by right of birth, without any examination, to

the degree of the Master of Arts. But he continued during some years

to reside at college, and to apply himself vigorously, under Pretyman's

direction, to the studies of the place, while mixing freely in the best

academic society.

The stock of learning which Pitt laid in during this part of his life

was certainly very extraordinary. In fact, it was all that he ever

possessed; for he very early became too busy to have any spare time

for books. The work in which he took the greatest delight was Newton's

Principia. His liking for mathematics, indeed, amounted to a passion,

which, in the opinion of his instructors, themselves distinguished

mathematicians, required to be checked rather than encouraged. The

acuteness and readiness with which he solved problems was pronounced by

one of the ablest of the moderators, who in those days presided over

the disputations in the schools, and conducted the examinations of the

Senate House, to be unrivalled in the university. Nor was the youth's

proficiency in classical learning less remarkable. In one respect,

indeed, he appeared to disadvantage when compared with even second-rate

and third-rate men from public schools. He had never, while under

Wilson's care, been in the habit of composing in the ancient languages:

and he therefore never acquired that knack of versification which is

sometimes possessed by clever boys whose knowledge of the language and

literature of Greece and Rome is very superficial. It would have been

utterly out of his power to produce such charming elegiac lines as those

in which Wellesley bade farewell to Eton, or such Virgilian hexameters

as those in which Canning described the pilgrimage to Mecca. But it may

be doubted whether any scholar has ever, at twenty, had a more solid and

profound knowledge of the two great tongues of the old civilised world.

The facility with which he penetrated the meaning of the most intricate

sentences in the Attic writers astonished veteran critics. He had set

his heart on being intimately acquainted with all the extant poetry

of Greece, and was not satisfied till he had mastered Lycophron's

Cassandra, the most obscure work in the whole range of ancient

literature. This strange rhapsody, the difficulties of which have

perplexed and repelled many excellent scholars, "he read," says his

preceptor, "with an ease at first sight, which, if I had not witnessed

it, I should have thought beyond the compass of human intellect."

To modern literature Pitt paid comparatively little attention. He knew

no living language except French; and French he knew very imperfectly.

With a few of the best English writers he was intimate, particularly

with Shakspeare and Milton. The debate in Pandemonium was, as it well

deserved to be, one of his favourite passages; and his early friends

used to talk, long after his death, of the just emphasis and the

melodious cadence with which they had heard him recite the incomparable

speech of Belial. He had indeed been carefully trained from infancy in

the art of managing his voice, a voice naturally clear and deep-toned.

His father, whose oratory owed no small part of its effect to that art,

had been a most skilful and judicious instructor. At a later period,

the wits of Brookes's, irritated by observing, night after night, how

powerfully Pitt's sonorous elocution fascinated the rows of country

gentlemen, reproached him with having been "taught by his dad on a

stool."

His education, indeed, was well adapted to form a great parliamentary

speaker. One argument often urged against those classical studies which

occupy so large apart of the early life of every gentleman bred in the

south of our island is, that they prevent him from acquiring a command

of his mother tongue, and that it is not unusual to meet with a youth

of excellent parts, who writes Ciceronian Latin prose and Horatian Latin

Alcaics, but who would find it impossible to express his thoughts in

pure, perspicuous, and forcible English. There may perhaps be some truth

in this observation. But the classical studies of Pitt were carried

on in a peculiar manner, and had the effect of enriching his English

vocabulary, and of making him wonderfully expert in the art of

constructing correct English sentences. His practice was to look over

a page or two of a Greek or Latin author, to make himself master of

the meaning, and then to read the passage straightforward into his

own language. This practice, begun under his first teacher Wilson, was

continued under Pretyman. It is not strange that a young man of great

abilities, who had been exercised daily in this way during ten years,

should have acquired an almost unrivalled power of putting his thoughts,

without premeditation, into words well selected and well arranged.

Of all the remains of antiquity, the orations were those on which he

bestowed the most minute examination. His favourite employment was to

compare harangues on opposite sides of the same question, to analyse

them, and to observe which of the arguments of the first speaker were

refuted by the second, which were evaded, and which were left untouched.

Nor was it only in books that he at this time studied the art

of parliamentary fencing. When he was at home, he had frequent

opportunities of hearing important debates at Westminster; and he heard

them, not only with interest and enjoyment, but with a close scientific

attention resembling that with which a diligent pupil at Guy's Hospital

watches every turn of the hand of a great surgeon through a difficult

operation. On one of these occasions, Pitt, a youth whose abilities

were as yet known only to his own family and to a small knot of college

friends, was introduced on the steps of the throne in the House of Lords

to Fox, who was his senior by eleven years, and who was already the

greatest debater, and one of the greatest orators, that had appeared

in England. Fox used afterwards to relate that, as the discussion

proceeded, Pitt repeatedly turned to him, and said, "But surely, Mr

Fox, that might be met thus;" or, "Yes; but he lays himself open to this

retort." What the particular criticisms were Fox had forgotten; but he

said that he was much struck at the time by the precocity of the lad

who, through the whole sitting, seemed to be thinking only how all the

speeches on both sides could be answered.

One of the young man's visits to the House of Lords was a sad and

memorable era in his life. He had not quite completed his nineteenth

year, when, on the 7th of April 1778, he attended his father to

Westminster. A great debate was expected. It was known that France had

recognised the independence of the United States. The Duke of Richmond

was about to declare his opinion that all thought of subjugating those

states ought to be relinquished. Chatham had always maintained that the

resistance of the colonies to the mother country was justifiable. But he

conceived, very erroneously, that on the day on which their independence

should be acknowledged the greatness of England would be at an end.

Though sinking under the weight of years and infirmities, he determined,

in spite of the entreaties of his family, to be in his place. His son

supported him to a seat. The excitement and exertion were too much for

the old man. In the very act of addressing the peers, he fell back in

convulsions. A few weeks later his corpse was borne, with gloomy pomp,

from the Painted Chamber to the Abbey. The favourite child and namesake

of the deceased statesman followed the coffin as chief mourner, and saw

it deposited in the transept where his own was destined to lie.

His elder brother, now Earl of Chatham, had means sufficient, and barely

sufficient, to support the dignity of the peerage. The other members of

the family were poorly provided for. William had little more than three

hundred a year. It was necessary for him to follow a profession. He had

already begun to eat his terms. In the spring of 1780 he came of age.

He then quitted Cambridge, was called to the bar, took chambers in

Lincoln's Inn, and joined the western circuit. In the autumn of

that year a general election took place; and he offered himself as a

candidate for the university; but he was at the bottom of the poll. It

is said that the grave doctors, who then sate robed in scarlet, on the

benches of Golgotha, thought it great presumption in so young a man

to solicit so high a distinction. He was, however, at the request of a

hereditary friend, the Duke of Rutland, brought into Parliament by Sir

James Lowther for the borough of Appleby.

The dangers of the country were at that time such as might well have

disturbed even a constant mind. Army after army had been sent in vain

against the rebellious colonists of North America. On pitched fields of

battle the advantage had been with the disciplined troops of the mother

country. But it was not on pitched fields of battle that the event of

such a contest could be decided. An armed nation, with hunger and the

Atlantic for auxiliaries, was not to be subjugated. Meanwhile the House

of Bourbon, humbled to the dust a few years before by the genius and

vigour of Chatham, had seized the opportunity of revenge. France and

Spain were united against us, and had recently been joined by Holland.

The command of the Mediterranean had been for a time lost. The British

flag had been scarcely able to maintain itself in the British Channel.

The northern powers professed neutrality; but their neutrality had a

menacing aspect. In the East, Hyder had descended on the Carnatic, had

destroyed the little army of Baillie, and had spread terror even to the

ramparts of Fort Saint George. The discontents of Ireland threatened

nothing less than civil war. In England the authority of the government

had sunk to the lowest point. The King and the House of Commons were

alike unpopular. The cry for parliamentary reform was scarcely less

loud and vehement than in the autumn of 1830. Formidable associations,

headed, not by ordinary demagogues, but by men of high rank, stainless

character, and distinguished ability, demanded a revision of the

representative system. The populace, emboldened by the impotence and

irresolution of the government, had recently broken loose from all

restraint, besieged the chambers of the legislature, hustled peers,

hunted bishops, attacked the residences of ambassadors, opened prisons,

burned and pulled down houses. London had presented during some days

the aspect of a city taken by storm; and it had been necessary to form a

camp among the trees of Saint James's Park.

In spite of dangers and difficulties abroad and at home, George the

Third, with a firmness which had little affinity with virtue or with

wisdom, persisted in his determination to put down the American rebels

by force of arms; and his ministers submitted their judgment to his.

Some of them were probably actuated merely by selfish cupidity; but

their chief, Lord North, a man of high honour, amiable temper, winning

manners, lively wit, and excellent talents both for business and for

debate, must be acquitted of all sordid motives. He remained at a post

from which he had long wished and had repeatedly tried to escape, only

because he had not sufficient fortitude to resist the entreaties and

reproaches of the King, who silenced all arguments by passionately

asking whether any gentleman, any man of spirit, could have the heart to

desert a kind master in the hour of extremity.

The opposition consisted of two parties which had once been hostile to

each other, and which had been very slowly, and, as it soon appeared,

very imperfectly reconciled, but which at this conjuncture seemed to act

together with cordiality. The larger of these parties consisted of the

great body of the Whig aristocracy. Its head was Charles, Marquess of

Rockingham, a man of sense and virtue, and in wealth and parliamentary

interest equalled by very few of the English nobles, but afflicted with

a nervous timidity which prevented him from taking a prominent part in

debate. In the House of Commons, the adherents of Rockingham were led

by Fox, whose dissipated habits and ruined fortunes were the talk of the

whole town, but whose commanding genius, and whose sweet, generous, and

affectionate disposition, extorted the admiration and love of those who

most lamented the errors of his private life. Burke, superior to Fox in

largeness of comprehension, in extent of knowledge, and in splendour of

imagination, but less skilled in that kind of logic and in that kind of

rhetoric which convince and persuade great assemblies, was willing to be

the lieutenant of a young chief who might have been his son.

A smaller section of the opposition was composed of the old followers

of Chatham. At their head was William, Earl of Shelburne, distinguished

both as a statesman and as a lover of science and letters. With him were

leagued Lord Camden, who had formerly held the Great Seal, and whose

integrity, ability, and constitutional knowledge commanded the public

respect; Barre, an eloquent and acrimonious declaimer; and Dunning, who

had long held the first place at the English bar. It was to this party

that Pitt was naturally attracted.

On the 26th of February 1781, he made his first speech, in favour of

Burke's plan of economical reform. Fox stood up at the same moment,

but instantly gave way. The lofty yet animated deportment of the young

member, his perfect self-possession, the readiness with which he replied

to the orators who had preceded him, the silver tones of his voice,

the perfect structure of his unpremeditated sentences, astonished and

delighted his hearers. Burke, moved even to tears, exclaimed, "It is not

a chip of the old block; it is the old block itself." "Pitt will be one

of the first men in Parliament," said a member of the opposition to Fox.

"He is so already," answered Fox, in whose nature envy had no place.

It is a curious fact, well remembered by some who were very recently

living, that soon after this debate Pitt's name was put up by Fox at

Brookes's.

On two subsequent occasions during that session Pitt addressed the

House, and on both fully sustained the reputation which he had acquired

on his first appearance. In the summer, after the prorogation, he again

went the western circuit, held several briefs, and acquitted himself in

such a manner that he was highly complimented by Buller from the bench,

and by Dunning at the bar.

On the 27th of November the Parliament reassembled. Only forty-eight

hours before had arrived tidings of the surrender of Cornwallis and

his army; and it had consequently been necessary to rewrite the royal

speech. Every man in the kingdom, except the King, was now convinced

that it was mere madness to think of conquering the United States.

In the debate on the report of the address, Pitt spoke with even

more energy and brilliancy than on any former occasion. He was warmly

applauded by his allies; but it was remarked that no person on his

own side of the house was so loud in eulogy as Henry Dundas, the Lord

Advocate of Scotland, who spoke from the ministerial ranks. That able

and versatile politician distinctly foresaw the approaching downfall of

the government with which he was connected, and was preparing to make

his own escape from the ruin. From that night dates his connection with

Pitt, a connection which soon became a close intimacy, and which lasted

till it was dissolved by death.

About a fortnight later, Pitt spoke in the committee of supply on

the army estimates. Symptoms of dissension had begun to appear on the

Treasury bench. Lord George Germaine, the Secretary of State, who was

especially charged with the direction of the war in America, had held

language not easily to be reconciled with declarations made by the First

Lord of the Treasury. Pitt noticed the discrepancy with much force and

keenness. Lord George and Lord North began to whisper together; and

Welbore Ellis, an ancient placeman who had been drawing salary almost

every quarter since the days of Henry Pelham, bent down between them to

put in a word. Such interruptions sometimes discompose veteran speakers.

Pitt stopped, and, looking at the group, said, with admirable readiness,

"I shall wait till Nestor has composed the dispute between Agamemnon and

Achilles."

After several defeats, or victories hardly to be distinguished from

defeats, the ministry resigned. The King, reluctantly and ungraciously,

consented to accept Rockingham as first minister. Fox and Shelburne

became Secretaries of State. Lord John Cavendish, one of the most

upright and honourable of men, was made Chancellor of the Exchequer.

Thurlow, whose abilities and force of character had made him the

dictator of the House of Lords, continued to hold the great seal.

To Pitt was offered, through Shelburne, the Vice-Treasurership of

Ireland, one of the easiest and most highly paid places in the gift of

the crown; but the offer was, without hesitation, declined. The young

statesman had resolved to accept no post which did not entitle him to

a seat in the cabinet: and, in a few days later, he announced that

resolution in the House of Commons. It must be remembered that the

cabinet was then a much smaller and more select body than at present. We

have seen cabinets of sixteen. In the time of our grandfathers a cabinet

of ten or eleven was thought inconveniently large. Seven was an usual

number. Even Burke, who had taken the lucrative office of paymaster, was

not in the cabinet. Many therefore thought Pitt's declaration indecent.

He himself was sorry that he had made it. The words, he said in private,

had escaped him in the heat of speaking; and he had no sooner uttered

them than he would have given the world to recall them. They, however,

did him no harm with the public. The second William Pitt, it was said,

had shown that he had inherited the spirit, as well as the genius, of

the first. In the son, as in the father, there might perhaps be too much

pride; but there was nothing low or sordid. It might be called arrogance

in a young barrister, living in chambers on three hundred a year, to

refuse a salary of five thousand a year, merely because he did not

choose to bind himself to speak or vote for plans which he had no share

in framing; but surely such arrogance was not very far removed from

virtue.

Pitt gave a general support to the administration of Rockingham, but

omitted, in the meantime, no opportunity of courting that Ultra-Whig

party which the persecution of Wilkes and the Middlesex election had

called into existence, and which the disastrous events of the war, and

the triumph of republican principles in America, had made formidable

both in numbers and in temper. He supported a motion for shortening the

duration of Parliaments. He made a motion for a committee to examine

into the state of the representation, and, in the speech, by which that

motion was introduced, avowed himself the enemy of the close boroughs,

the strongholds of that corruption to which he attributed all the

calamities of the nation, and which, as he phrased it in one of those

exact and sonorous sentences of which he had a boundless command, had

grown with the growth of England and strengthened with her strength,

but had not diminished with her diminution or decayed with her decay.

On this occasion he was supported by Fox. The motion was lost by

only twenty votes in a house of more than three hundred members. The

reformers never again had so good a division till the year 1831.

The new administration was strong in abilities, and was more popular

than any administration which had held office since the first year of

George the Third, but was hated by the King, hesitatingly supported by

the Parliament, and torn by internal dissensions. The Chancellor

was disliked and distrusted by almost all his colleagues. The two

Secretaries of State regarded each other with no friendly feeling. The

line between their departments had not been traced with precision; and

there were consequently jealousies, encroachments, and complaints. It

was all that Rockingham could do to keep the peace in his cabinet; and,

before the cabinet had existed three months, Rockingham died.

In an instant all was confusion. The adherents of the deceased statesman

looked on the Duke of Portland as their chief. The King placed Shelburne

at the head of the Treasury. Fox, Lord John Cavendish, and Burke,

immediately resigned their offices; and the new prime minister was left

to constitute a government out of very defective materials. His own

parliamentary talents were great; but he could not be in the place where

parliamentary talents were most needed. It was necessary to find some

member of the House of Commons who could confront the great orators of

the opposition; and Pitt alone had the eloquence and the courage which

were required. He was offered the great place of Chancellor of

the Exchequer; and he accepted it. He had scarcely completed his

twenty-third year.

The Parliament was speedily prorogued. During the recess, a negotiation

for peace which had been commenced under Rockingham was brought to a

successful termination. England acknowledged the independence of her

revolted colonies; and she ceded to her European enemies some places

in the Mediterranean and in the Gulf of Mexico. But the terms which she

obtained were quite as advantageous and honourable as the events of

the war entitled her to expect, or as she was likely to obtain by

persevering in a contest against immense odds. All her vital parts, all

the real sources of her power, remained uninjured. She preserved even

her dignity: for she ceded to the House of Bourbon only part of what she

had won from that House in previous wars. She retained her Indian

empire undiminished; and, in spite of the mightiest efforts of two great

monarchies, her flag still waved on the rock of Gibraltar. There is not

the slightest reason to believe that Fox, if he had remained in office,

would have hesitated one moment about concluding a treaty on such

conditions. Unhappily that great and most amiable man was, at this

crisis, hurried by his passions into an error which made his genius

and his virtues, during a long course of years, almost useless to his

country.

Miscellaneous Writings and Speeches — Volume 3 · 第 8 / 16 段