He then states what is "fundamental."[49]

"The real root of the disaffection which exhibits itself at present in

the guise of Fenianism, and which has been suddenly kindled into flame

by the arming of the Irish in the American civil war, but which existed

before in a nameless and smouldering state, is, as I believe, the want

of national institutions, of a national capital, of any objects of

national reverence and attachment, and consequently of anything

deserving to be called national life. The English Crown and Parliament

the Irish have never learnt, nor have they had any chance of learning,

to love, or to regard as national, notwithstanding the share which was

given them, too late, in the representation. The greatness of England is

nothing to them. Her history is nothing, or worse. The success of

Irishmen in London consoles the Irish in Ireland no more than the

success of Italian adventurers in foreign countries (which was very

remarkable) consoled the Italian people. The drawing off of Irish

talent, in fact, turns to an additional grievance in their minds. Dublin

is a modern Tara, a metropolis from which the glory has departed; and

the viceroyalty, though it pleases some of the tradesmen, fails

altogether to satisfy the people. 'In Ireland we can make no appeal to

patriotism, we can have no patriotic sentiments in our schoolbooks, no

patriotic emblems in our schools, because in Ireland everything

patriotic is rebellious.' These were the words uttered in my hearing,

not by a complaining demagogue, but by a desponding statesman. They

seemed to me pregnant with fatal truths.

"If the craving for national institutions, and the disaffection bred in

this void of the Irish people's heart, seem to us irrational and even

insane, in the absence of any more substantial grievance, we ought to

ask ourselves what would become of our own patriotism if we had no

national institutions, no objects of national loyalty and reverence,

even though we might be pretty well governed, at least in intention, by

a neighbouring people whom we regarded as aliens, and who, in fact,

regarded us pretty much in the same light. Let us first judge ourselves

fairly, and then judge the Irish, remembering always that they are more

imaginative and sentimental, and need some centre of national feeling

and affection more than ourselves."[50]

And all this was written sixty-seven years after the Union of 1800.

Mr. Goldwin Smith then deals with the subject of the Irish and Scotch

unions much in the same way as Mr. Lecky.

"The incorporation of the Scotch nation with the English, being

conducted on the right principles by the great Whig statesman of Anne,

has been perfectly successful. The attempt to incorporate the Irish

nation with the English and Scotch, the success of which would have

been, if possible, a still greater blessing, being conducted by very

different people and on very different principles, has unhappily failed.

What might have been the result if even the Hanoverian sovereigns had

done the personal duty to their Irish kingdom which they have

unfortunately neglected, it is now too late to inquire. The Irish Union

has missed its port, and, in order to reach it, will have to tack again.

We may hold down a dependency, of course, by force, in Russian and

Austrian fashion; but force will never make the hearts of two nations

one, especially when they are divided by the sea. Once get rid of this

deadly international hatred, and there will be hope of real union in the

future."[51]

Mr. Goldwin Smith finally proposes a "plan" by which the "deadly

international hatred" might be got rid of, and a "real union" brought

about. Here it is.

"1. The residence of the Court at Dublin, not merely to gratify the

popular love of royalty and its pageantries, which no man of sense

desires to stimulate, but to assure the Irish people, in the only way

possible as regards the mass of them, that the sovereign of the United

Kingdom is really their sovereign, and that they are equally cared for

and honoured with the other subjects of the realm. This would also tend

to make Dublin a real capital, and to gather and retain there a portion

of the Irish talent which now seeks its fortune elsewhere.

"2. An occasional session (say once in every three years) of the

Imperial Parliament in Dublin, partly for the same purposes as the last

proposal, but also because the circumstances of Ireland are likely to

be, for some time at least, really peculiar, and the personal

acquaintance of our legislators with them is the only sufficient

security for good Irish legislation. There could be no serious

difficulty in holding a short session in the Irish capital, where there

is plenty of accommodation for both Houses.

"3. A liberal measure of local self-government for Ireland. I would not

vest the power in any single assembly for all Ireland, because Ulster is

really a different country from the other provinces. I would give each

province a council of its own, and empower that council to legislate

(subject, of course, to the supremacy of the Imperial Parliament) on all

matters not essential to the political and legal unity of the empire, in

which I would include local education. The provincial councils should of

course be elective, and the register of electors might be the same as

that of electors to the Imperial Parliament. In England itself the

extension of local institutions, as political training schools for the

masses, as checks upon the sweeping action of the great central

assembly, and as the best organs of legislation in all matters requiring

(as popular education, among others, does) adaptation to the

circumstances of particular districts, would, I think, have formed a

part of any statesmanlike revision of our political system. Here, also,

much good might be done, and much evil averted, by committing the

present business of quarter sessions, other than the judicial business,

together with such other matters as the central legislative might think

fit to vest in local hands, to an assembly elected by the county."[52]

Thus it will be seen that twenty years ago Mr. Goldwin Smith anticipated

Mr. Chamberlain's scheme of provincial councils, and got a good way on

the road to an Irish Parliament.

* * * * *

Handbook of Home Rule: Being Articles on the Irish Question · 第 32 / 49 题