Ross; etc.
=Malthusianism=.--To take a smaller example. Suppose the student wishes
to make a thorough study of the doctrine of Malthusius in regard to
population, he will have to refer to Macaulay's "Essay on Sadler," and
the works on Political Economy of Ricardo, Chalmers, Roscher, etc., in
support of Malthus, and to George's "Progress and Poverty," Spencer's
"Biology" (Vol. II.), Sadler's "Law of Population," and the works of
Godwin, Greg, Rickards, Doubleday, Carey, Alison, etc., against him.
For an example of a very different kind, cluster about the myth of Cupid
the poems "Cupid and my Campaspe," by Lilly; "The Threat of Cupid,"
translated by Herrick; "Cupid Drowned," by Leigh Hunt; and "Cupid
Stung," by Moore.
A great deal depends on selecting some department of thought and
exhausting it. To know something of everything and everything of
something is the true aim. If a child displays fine musical or artistic
ability, among the books given it ought to be many that bear upon music
and art,--the "Autobiography of Rubenstein;" the Lives of Beethoven,
Mozart, Schubert, Chopin, Mendelssohn; and Rocksho's "History of Music,"
Upton's "Woman in Music," Clayton's "Queens of Song," Lillie's "Music
and the Musician," Haweis' "Music and Morals," Jameson's "Lives of the
Painters," Crowest's "Tone Poets," Clement's "Painting and Sculpture,"
Mereweather's "Semele, or the Spirit of Beauty," etc.
Probably these examples, with those to be found in the notes to Table
I., are amply sufficient to show what is meant by grouping the lights of
literature about a single point so as to illuminate it intensely; but
one more specimen will be given, because of the interest the subject has
for us now and is likely to have for many years.
=The Tariff Question= may be studied in Ely's "Problems of To-day,"
Greeley's "Political Economy," Carey's "Principles of Social Science,"
E. P. Smith's "Manual of Political Economy," Byles's "Sophisms of Free
Trade," Thompson's "Social Science and National Economy," Bastiat's
"Sophisms of Protection," Mill's "Political Economy," Sumner's "Lectures
on the History of Protection in the United States," Fawcett's "Free
Trade and Protection," Mongredien's "History of the Free Trade
Movement," Butt's "Protection Free Trade," Walters' "What is Free
Trade," "The Gladstone-Blaine Debate," etc.
TABLE V.
_Showing the Distribution of the Best Literature in Time and Space, with
a Parallel Reference to some of the World's Great Events._
[It was impossible to get the writers of the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries into the unit space. The former fills a
space twice the unit width, and the latter, when it is
complete, will require five units.]
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| | | | |
| GREECE | B.C. | ISRAEL | |
| Homer | 1000 | David, The | |
| Hesiod | | Psalms | |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| | 900 | | |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| | 800 | | Rome founded |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| AEsop | 700 | | |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| | 600 | INDIA | Nebuchadnezzar, |
| | | Buddha | king of Babylon |
| | | | |
| | | | Republic |
| | | | established at |
| | | | Rome |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| THE GOLDEN AGE OF GRECIAN | 500 | Mahabharata | Darius, king of |
| LITERATURE | | Ramayana | Persia |
| Pindar AEschylus Herodotus | |(Epics of India)| GREECE |
| Sophocles Thucydides| | | Battle of |
| | | | Marathon |
| Pericles Euripides Xenophon | | | " " Thermopylae |
| Aristophanes | | | " " Salamis |
| | | | Cincinnatus at |
| | | | Rome |
| Socrates | | |Ezra at Jerusalem |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| Plato | 400 | | Alexander |
| Aristotle | | | The Gauls burn |
| Demosthenes | | | Rome |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| | 300 | | Wars of Rome |
| | | | against Carthage |
| | | |Hannibal in Italy |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| | 200 | | Greece becomes a |
| | | | Roman Province |
| | | | |
| | | | ROME |
| | | | The Gracchi, |
| | | | Marius, and |
| | | | Sylla |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
|ROME. AUGUSTAN AGE, 31 | 100 | | ROME |
| B. C. TO A. D. 14. | | | |
| Reatinus Ovid | | | Pompey |
| Sallust Livy | | | Civil War, |
| Cicero Lucretius | | | Empire |
| Virgil | | | established |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| Tacitus | A.D. | | Jerusalem taken |
| | | | by Titus |
| Plutarch Juvenal | | | Pompeii |
| | | | overwhelmed |
| Pliny | | Josephus | Romans conquer |
| | | | Britain |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| Epictetus | 100 | | Church Fathers |
| Marcus Aurelius | | | |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| | 200 | | |
| | | | Aurelian conquers |
| | | | Zenobia |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| | 300 | | Under Constantine |
| | | | Christianity |
| | | | becomes the |
| | | | State religion |
| | | | Roman Empire |
| | | | divided |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| | 400 | | Angles and Saxons |
| | | | drive out the |
| | | | Britons |
| | | | Huns under Attila |
| | | | invade the |
| | | | Roman Empire |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| | 500 | | Christianity |
| | | | carried to |
| | | | England by |
| | | | Augustine |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| ENGLISH LITERATURE | 600 | ARABIA | |
| Caedmon | | Mahomet | |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| Baeda | 700 | | FRANCE |
| Cynewulf | | | Charlemagne |
| | | | founds the |
| | | | Empire of the |
| | | | West |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| AElfred, 850-900 | 800 | | Danes overrun |
| | | | England |
| | | | _AElfred's_ |
| | | | _glorious |
| | | | _reign_ |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| | 900 | | Chivalry begins |
| | | | Capetian kings in |
| | | | France |
| | | | ENGLAND |
| | | | Saint Dunstan |
| | | | Papal supremacy |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| | 1000 | PERSIA | ENGLAND |
| | | Firdusi's Shah| Canute the Great|
| | | Nameh | 1066. |
| | | | _Norman_ |
| | | | _Conquest_ |
| | | | Peter the Hermit |
| | | | First Crusade |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| Geoffrey of Monmouth | 1100 |PERSIA | ENGLAND |
| | | Omar Khayyam | Plantagenets |
| | |GERMANY | Richard I. |
| | | Nibelungenlied| |
| | | SPAIN | FRANCE |
| | | Chronicle of | Second and Third|
| | | the Cid | Crusades |
| | | | Saint Bernard |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| Layamon | 1200 |PERSIA | ENGLAND |
| Roger Bacon | | Saadi | 1215. Runnymede,|
| | | | Magna Charta |
| | | | Edward I. |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| Mandeville | 1300 | ITALY | ENGLAND |
| Langland | | Dante | Chivalry at its |
| Wycliffe Chaucer | | Petrarch | height |
| Gower | | Boccaccio | The Black Prince|
| | | | _Gunpowder_ |
| | | | |
| | |PERSIA | FRANCE |
| | | Hafiz | Battles of |
| | | | Crecy, |
| | | | Poictiers, and|
| | | | Agincourt |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| Lydgate | 1400 |GERMANY | ENGLAND |
| Fortescue | | Thomas a | Henry VIII. |
| Malory | | Kempis | shook off the |
| | | | Pope |
| | | Arabian Nights |_Movable Type_ |
| | | (probably) |_Discovery of_ |
| | |PERSIA |_America_ |
| | | Jami | Joan of Arc |
| | | | Wars of the Roses |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| | | | _Copernicus_ |
| More Ascham | 1500 | ITALY | _Kepler_ |
| Lyly Sackville | | Ariosto | _The Armada_ |
| Sidney | | Tasso | ENGLAND |
| Marlowe Fox | | Galileo | Henry VIII., |
| Spenser Hooker | | | Elizabeth |
| | | | GERMANY |
| | |FRANCE | 1515. _Luther's_ |
| | | Montaigne | _Reformation_ |
| | | | FRANCE |
| | | | Massacre of St. |
| | | | Bartholomew |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| Jonson Bacon Herbert | 1600 |SPAIN. | 1620. Plymouth |
| Shakspeare Newton J.Taylor| | Cervantes | Rock and the |
| Chapman Hobbes | | Calderon | "Mayflower" |
| Beaumont & Walton | |GERMANY | 1649 |
| Fletcher S. Butler | | Kepler | _Cromwell_ |
| Milton Locke | |FRANCE | 1660 Restoration |
| Bunyan Pepys | | Descartes |1688 Revolution |
| Dryden | | Corneille | William and Mary |
| | | Racine | FRANCE. |
| | | Moliere | Louis XIV. |
| | | La Fontain | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| Addison Cowper Otis | 1700 |FRANCE | 1776. American |
| Steele Burns Jay | | Montesquieu | Revolution |
| Pope Rogers Adams | | Le Sage | 1789-94. French |
| Defoe Hume Hamilton | | Rousseau | Revolution |
| Swift Edwards Madison | | Voltaire | ENGLAND |
| Berkeley A. Smith Jefferson| | | Marlborough |
| J. Butler Bentham Pitt | |GERMANY | |
| Moore Gibbon Burke | | Munchausen | |
| Thomson Johnson Fox | | Lessing | |
| Young Boswell Erskine | | | |
| Gray Malthus P. Henry.| | | |
| Goldsmith Mackintosh | | | |
| Sterne Paine | | | |
| | | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
| | | | |
| Scott Herschel DeQuincey| 1800 |GERMANY | 1807. Fulton's |
| Byron Whewell Whately | | Schiller | Steamboat |
| Bryant Ricardo Jeffrey | | Goethe | Wellington |
| Drake Carey Brougham | | Kant | 1815. Waterloo |
| Wordsworth Faraday S. Smith | | Fichte | 1815. White wives |
| Keats Lyell C. North | | Hegel | sold in England |
| Shelley Agassiz N. Webster| | Schelling | 1830. Passenger |
| Payne Whitney H. H. White| | Niebuhr | railway |
| Keble A. Gray D. Webster| | Schlosser | 1833. Matches |
| Halleck Hallam Sparks | | Heine | 1844. Telegraph |
| Key Prescott Story | | Haeckel | 1845. Mexican War |
| Macaulay Lewes Gould | | Helmholtz | |
| Hood Milman Cooper | | Grimm | |
| Poe Buckle Disraeli | | Froebel | |
| Read Merivale Dickens | | | |
| Tennyson Hildreth Thackeray| |FRANCE | 1860. Rebellion |
| Browning Freeman Bronte | | La Place | 1863. Emancipation|
| Lowell Draper Hawthorne| | Guizot | |
| Longfellow Froude Irving | | De Tocqueville| |
| Carleton Walpole Hughes | | Comte | |
| Ingelow Lecky Kingsley | | Hugo | |
| Whittier Parkman Eliot | | Dumas | 1870. Franco- |
| Mill Bancroft Collins | | Balzac | German War |
| Spencer Whipple Macdonald| | Renan | 1874. The |
| Ruskin Twain Hunt | | Taine | Telephone |
| Arnold Jerrold Wallace | | | Emancipation of |
| Curtis Choate Clarke | |RUSSIA | serfs in |
| Holmes Lincoln Landor | | Pushkin | Russia |
| Mansel Phillips Tourgee | | Lermontoff | |
| Carlyle Everett Holland | | Bashkirtseff | |
| Emerson Sumner Howells | | Tolstoi | |
| Darwin Garfield Mrs. Whitney| | | |
| Huxley Gladstone Miss Alcott| |DENMARK | |
| Dana A. D. White Bellamy | | Andersen | |
| Tyndall Beecher Gronlund | | | |
| Lubbock P. Brooks Gilman | |POLAND | |
| Proctor Lamb Holley | | Sienkiewicz | |
| Davy Hazlitt Dodge | | | |
| Proctor Lamb Jewett | | | |
| Davy Hazlitt Burroughs| | | |
| Bright Rives Stowe | | | |
| Fiske Aldrich Hearn | | | |
| Curtin Warner Burnett | | | |
| Hale Curtis | | | |
| Edwards Higginson | | | |
| | | | |
| | 1900 | | |
+-------------------------------+------+----------------+-------------------+
REMARKS ON TABLE V.
=Definitions and Divisions=.--Literature is life pulsing through life
upon life; but only when the middle life imparts new beauty to the first
is literature produced in any true and proper sense. The last life is
that of the reader; the middle one that of the author; the first that of
the person or age he pictures. Literature is the past pouring itself
into the present. Every great man consumes and digests his own times.
Shakspeare gives us the England of the 16th century, with the added
qualities of beauty, ideality, and order. When we read Gibbon's "Rome,"
it is really the life of all those turbulent times of which he writes
that is pouring upon us through the channels of genius. Dante paints
with his own sublime skill the portraits of Italy in the 14th century,
of his own rich, inner life, and of the universal human soul in one
composite masterpiece of art. In one of Munchausen's stories, a bugler
on the stage-top in St. Petersburg was surprised to find that the bugle
stopped in the middle of the song. Afterward, in Italy, sweet music was
heard, and upon investigation it was found that a part of the song had
been frozen in the instrument in Russia, and thawed in the warmer air of
Italy. So the music of river and breeze, of battle and banquet, was
frozen in the verse of Homer nearly three thousand years ago, and is
ready at any time, under the heat of our earnest study, to pour its
harmony into our lives.
It is the fact that beauty is added by the author which distinguishes
_Literature_ from the pictures of life that are given to us by newspaper
reporters, tables of statistics, etc. Literature is not merely life,--it
is life _crystallized in art_. This is the first great line dividing the
Literary from the Non-Literary. The first class is again divided into
Poetry and Prose. In the first the form is measured, and the substance
imagery and imagination. In the latter the form is unmeasured, and the
substance direct. Imagery is the heart of poetry, and rhythm its body.
The thought must be expressed not in words merely, but in words that
convey other thoughts through which the first shines. The inner life is
pictured in the language of external Nature, and Nature is painted in
the colors of the heart. The poet must dip his brush in that eternal
paint-pot from which the forests and fields, the mountains, the sky, and
the stars were painted. He must throw human life out upon the world, and
draw the world into the stream of his own thought. Sometimes we find the
substance of the poetic in the dress of prose, as in Emerson's and in
Ingersoll's lectures, and then we have the prose poem; and sometimes we
find the form of poetry with only the direct expression, which is the
substance of prose, or perhaps without even the substance of _literary_
prose, as in parts of Wordsworth, Pope, Longfellow, Homer, Tennyson,
and even sometimes in Shakspeare; see, for example, Tennyson's "Dirge."
=Tests for the Choice of Books=.--In deciding which of those glorious
ships that sail the ages, bringing their precious freight of genius to
every time and people, we shall invite into our ports, we must consider
the nature of the crew, the beauty, strength, and size of the vessel,
the depth of our harbor, the character of the cargo, and our own wants.
In estimating the value of a book, we have to note (1) the kind of life
that forms its material; (2) the qualities of the author,--that is, of
the life through which the stream comes to us, and whose spirit is
caught by the current, as the breezes that come through the garden bear
with them the perfume of flowers that they touch; (3) the form of the
book, its music, simplicity, size, and artistic shape; (4) its merits,
compared with the rest of the books in its own sphere of thought; (5)
its fame; (6) our abilities; and (7) our needs. There result several
tests of the claims of any book upon our attention.
I. What effect will it have upon character? Will it make me more
careful, earnest, sincere, placid, sympathetic, gay, enthusiastic,
loving, generous, pure, and brave by exercising these emotions in me,
and more abhorrent of evil by showing me its loathsomeness; or more
sorrowful, fretful, cruel, envious, vindictive, cowardly, and false,
less reverent of right and more attracted by evil, by picturing good as
coming from contemptible sources, and evil as clothed with beauty? Is
the author such a man as I would wish to be the companion of my heart,
or such as I must study to avoid?
II. What effect will the book produce upon the mind? Will it exercise
and strengthen my fancy, imagination, memory, invention, originality,
insight, breadth, common-sense, and philosophic power? Will it make me
bright, witty, reasonable, and tolerant? Will it give me the quality of
intellectual beauty? Will it give me a deeper knowledge of human life,
of Nature, and of my business, or open the doorways of any great temple
of science where I am as yet a stranger? Will it help to build a
standard of taste in literature for the guidance of myself and others?
Will it give me a knowledge of what other people are thinking and
feeling, thus opening the avenues of communication between my life and
theirs?
III. What will be the effect on my skills and accomplishments? Will it
store my mind full of beautiful thoughts and images that will make my
conversation a delight and profit to my friends? Will it teach me how to
write with power, give me the art of thinking clearly and expressing my
thought with force and attractiveness? Will it supply a knowledge of the
best means of attaining any other desired art or accomplishment?
IV. Is the book simple enough for me? Is it within my grasp? If not, I
must wait till I have come upon a level with it.
V. Will the book impart a pleasure in the very reading? This test alone
is not reliable; for till our taste is formed, the trouble may not be in
it but in ourselves.
VI. Has it been superseded by a later book, or has its truth passed into
the every-day life of the race? If so, I do not need to read it. Other
things equal, the authors nearest to us in time and space have the
greatest claims on our attention. Especially is this true in science, in
which each succeeding great book sucks the life out of all its
predecessors. In poetry there is a principle that operates in the
opposite direction; for what comes last is often but an imitation, that
lacks the fire and force of the original. Nature is best painted, not
from books, but from her own sweet face.
VII. What is the relation of the book to the completeness of my
development? Will it fill a gap in the walls of my building? Other
things equal, I had better read about something I know nothing of than
about something I am familiar with; for the aim is to get a picture of
the universe in my brain, and a full development of my whole nature. It
is a good plan to read everything of something and something of
everything. A too general reader seems vague and hazy, as if he were fed
on fog; and a too special reader is narrow and hard, as if fed on
needles.
VIII. Is the matter inviting my attention of permanent value? The
profits of reading what is merely of the moment are not so great as
those accruing from the reading of literature that is of all time. To
hear the gossip of the street is not as valuable as to hear the lectures
of Joseph Cook, or the sermons of Beecher and Brooks. On this principle,
most of our time should be spent on classics, and very little upon
transient matter. There is a vast amount of energy wasted in this
country in the reading of newspapers and periodicals. The newspaper is a
wonderful thing. It brings the whole huge earth to me in a little brown
wrapper every morning. The editor is a sort of travelling stage-manager,
who sets up his booth on my desk every day, bringing with him the
greatest performers from all the countries of the world, to play their
parts before my eyes. Yonder is an immense mass-meeting; and that mite,
brandishing his mandibles in an excited manner, is the great Mr.
So-and-So, explaining his position amid the tumultuous explosions of an
appreciative multitude. That puffet of smoke and dust to the right is a
revolution. There in the shadow of the wood comes an old man who lays
down a scythe and glass while he shifts the scenes, and we see a bony
hand reaching out to snatch back a player in the midst of his part, and
even trying to clutch the showman himself. For three dollars a year I
can buy a season ticket to this great Globe theatre, for which God
writes the dramas, whose scene-shifter is Time, and whose curtain is
rung down by Death.[1] But theatre-going, if kept up continuously, is
very enervating. 'T is better far to read the hand-bills and placards
at the door, and only when the play is great go in. Glance at the
head-lines of the paper always; read the mighty pages seldom. The
editors could save the nation millions of rich hours by a daily column
of _brief but complete_ statements of the paper's contents, instead of
those flaring head-lines that allure but do not satisfy, and only lead
us on to read that Mr. Windbag nominated Mr. Darkhorse amid great
applause, and that Mr. Darkhorse accepted in a three-column speech
skilfully constructed so as to commit himself to nothing; or that Mr.
Bondholder's daughter was married, and that Mrs. So-and-So wore cream
satin and point lace, with roses, etc.
[1] Adapted from Lowell.
=Intrinsic Merit=.--It must be noted that the tests of intrinsic merit
are not precisely the same as the tests for the choice of books. The
latter include the former and more. Intrinsic merit depends on the
character impressed upon the book by its subject-matter and the author;
but in determining the claims of a book upon the attention of the
ordinary English reader, it is necessary not only to look at the book
itself, but also to consider the needs and abilities of the reader. One
may not be able to read the book that is intrinsically the best, because
of the want of time or lack of sufficient mental development. Green's
"Short History of England" and Dickens' "Child's History of England" may
not be the greatest works in their department, but they may have the
_greatest claims on the attention_ of one whose time or ability is
limited. A chief need of every one is to know what others are thinking
and feeling. To open up avenues of communication between mind and mind
is one of the great objects of reading. Now it often happens that a book
of no very high merit artistically considered--a book that can never
take rank as a classic--becomes very famous, and is for a time the
subject of much comment and conversation. In such cases all who would
remain in thorough sympathy with their fellows must give the book at
least a hasty reading, or in some way gain a knowledge of its contents.
Intrinsically "Robert Elsmere" and "Looking Backward" may not be worthy
of high rank (though I am by no means so sure of this as many of the
critics seem to be); but their fame, joined as it is with high motive,
entitles them to a reading.
It is always a good plan, however, to endeavor to ascertain the absolute
or intrinsic merit of a book first, and afterward arrive at the relative
value or claim upon the attention by making the correction required by
the time and place, later publications in the same department, the
peculiar needs and abilities of readers, etc.
In testing intrinsic worth we must consider--
Motive.
Magnitude.
Unity.
Universality.
Suggestiveness.
Expression.
=Motive=.--The purpose of the author and the emotional character of the
subject matter are of great importance. A noble subject nobly handled
begets nobility in the reader, and a spirit of meanness brought into a
book by its subject or author also impresses itself upon those who come
in contact with it. Kind, loving books make the world more
tender-hearted; coarse and lustful books degrade mankind. The nobility
of the sentiment in and underlying a work is therefore a test of prime
importance.