That which experience has taught us, Washington caught sight of

from the first day. At the time when the French Revolution had

hardly begun, he was already suspending his judgment, and taking

his position aloof from all parties and all spectators; free from

the presumption of their predictions, from the blindness of their

hostility or their hope. "The whole business is so extraordinary

in its commencement, so wonderful in its progress, and maybe so

stupendous in its consequences, that I am almost lost in the

contemplation. ... Nobody is more anxious for the happy issue of

that business, than I am; as no one can wish more sincerely for

the prosperity of the French nation, than I do." [Footnote 77]

[Footnote 77: Washington's Writings, Vol. X. p. 89.]

{134}

"If it ends as our last accounts, to the first of August, [1789,]

predict, that nation will be the most powerful and happy in

Europe; but I fear, though it has gone triumphantly through the

first paroxysm, it is not the last it has to encounter before,

matters are finally settled. ... The mortification of the king,

the intrigues of the queen, and the discontent of the princes and

noblesse, will foment divisions, if possible, in the National

Assembly; ... the licentiousness of the people on one hand, and

sanguinary punishments on the other, will alarm the best disposed

friends to the measure. ... To forbear running from one extreme

to another is no easy matter; and, should this be the case, rocks

and shelves, not visible at present, may wreck the vessel, and

give a higher-toned despotism than the one which existed before."

[Footnote 78] "It is a boundless ocean, whence no land is to be

seen." [Footnote 79]

[Footnote 78: Washington's Writings, Vol. X. p. 40.]

[Footnote 79: Ibid., Vol. X. p. 344.]

{135}

From that time, he maintained towards the nations and events of

Europe an extreme reserve; faithful to the principles which had

founded the independence and the liberties of America, animated

by a grateful good-will towards France, and seizing with

earnestness upon every occasion to manifest it, but silent and

self-restrained, as if under the presentiment of some grave

responsibility of which he should be obliged to sustain the

weight, and not wishing to pledge beforehand either his personal

opinion or the policy of his country. When the trying moment

arrived, when the declaration of war between France and England

caused the great revolutionary struggle to break out in Europe,

the resolution of Washington was decided and prompt. He

immediately made proclamation of the neutrality of the United

States. "My politics are plain and simple; ... to maintain

friendly terms with, but be independent of, all the nations of

the earth; to share in the broils of none; to fulfil our own

engagements; to supply the wants and be carriers for them all;

being thoroughly convinced, that it is our policy and interest to

do so." [Footnote 80] "I want an _American_ character, that

the powers of Europe may be convinced, we act for

_ourselves_, and not for others." [Footnote 81]

[Footnote 80: Washington's Writings,

Vol. XI. pp. 382, 102.]

[Footnote 81: Ibid., Vol. XI. p. 83.]

{136}

"Regarding the overthrow of Europe at large as a matter not

entirely chimerical, it will be our prudence to cultivate a

spirit of self-dependence, and to endeavor, by unanimity,

vigilance, and exertion, under the blessing of Providence, to

hold the scales of our destiny in our own hands. Standing, as it

were, in the midst of falling empires, it should be our aim to

assume a station and attitude, which will preserve us from being

overwhelmed in their ruins." [Footnote 82] "Nothing short of

self-respect, and that justice which is essential to a national

character, ought to involve us in war; for sure I am, if this

country is preserved in tranquillity twenty years longer, it may

bid defiance, in a just cause, to any power whatever; such, in

that time, will be its population, wealth, and resources."

[Footnote 83]

[Footnote 82: Washington's Writings, Vol. XI. p 350.]

[Footnote 83: Ibid., Vol. XI. p. 102.]

At first, the approbation was general. The desire for peace, and

the reluctance to express any opinion which might endanger it,

were predominant in men's minds. Upon the principle of neutrality

the cabinet had been unanimous.

{137}

But intelligence from Europe was continually arriving, and was

spreading like wild-fire through the country. The coalition

formed against France assailed the guardian principles of

America, the independence and internal liberty of nations.

England was at its head, hated as a recent enemy, suspected as a

former master. Her decrees and measures in regard to neutral

commerce and the impressment of sailors wounded the United States

in their dignity and their interests. With the great question of

neutrality, particular questions arose, doubtful enough to serve

as a just reason or a pretext for diversity of opinions and

strong expressions of feeling. Upon some of them, as, for

instance, on the restitution of maritime prizes and the mode of

receiving the new minister expected from France, the cabinet was

no longer unanimous. This minister, M. Genêt, arrived; and his

journey from Charleston to Philadelphia was a popular triumph.

Everywhere, on his journey, numerous and enthusiastic democratic

associations assembled, invited him to meet them, and made

addresses to him; the newspapers rapidly circulated through the

country accounts of these rejoicings and the news from France.

{138}

The public feeling grew more and more inflamed. Of an

enthusiastic temperament himself, and blindly borne away by the

desire of engaging the United States in a war to aid his country,

M. Genêt believed himself to have the right and the ability to

dare every thing, and to succeed in every thing. He issued

letters of marque, enrolled American citizens, armed privateers,

adjudged prizes, and acted as a sovereign power in this foreign

territory, in the name of republican brotherhood. And when

Washington, at first astonished and motionless, but soon

determined, vindicated the rights of the general government.

Genêt entered into an avowed contest with him, supported his own

pretensions, broke out into violent abuse of him, encouraged the

spirit of sedition, and even threatened to appeal to the people

against a President who was unfaithful to his trust, and to the

general cause of liberty. No head of a state was ever more

reserved than Washington in the exercise of power; more cautious

in making engagements and taking new steps.

{139}

But, also, no one ever maintained more firmly his declarations,

his purposes, and his rights. He was President of the United

States of America. He had, in their name, and by virtue of their

constitution, proclaimed their neutrality. The neutrality was to

be real and respected as well as his power. At five successive

meetings, he laid before his cabinet the whole correspondence,

and all the documents, relating to this singular contest; and the

cabinet decided unanimously, that the recall of M. Genêt should

be immediately demanded of the French government.

Genêt was recalled. In the opinion of America, as well as in his

demand upon France, Washington gained a triumph. The federalists

indignantly rallied around him. The pretensions and extravagant

conduct of Genêt had alienated many persons of the democratic

party. Jefferson had not hesitated to support the President

against him. A favorable reaction took place, and the contest

seemed at an end.

{140}

But in government, as well as in war, there are victories which

cost dear, and leave the danger still existing. The revolutionary

fever, once more kindled in the United States, did not depart

with a recalled minister. Instead of that harmony of feeling,

that calm after the storm of passions; instead of that course of

prosperity and general moderation, upon which the American

republic was lately congratulating itself, two parties were there

in a hostile attitude, more widely separated, more violently

irritated, than ever. The opposition no longer confined its

attacks to the administration alone, to the financial measures of

government, and to this or that doubtful application of legal

powers. It had, concealed within itself, in the democratic

associations, in the periodical press, and among the foreigners

who swarmed throughout the country, a true revolutionary faction,

eager to overturn society and its government, in order to

reconstruct them upon other foundations. "There exists in the

United States," writes Washington to Lafayette, "a party formed

by a combination of causes, which oppose the government in all

its measures, and are determined, as all their conduct evinces,

by clogging its wheels, indirectly to change the nature of it,

and to subvert the Constitution.

{141}

To effect this, no means which have a tendency to accomplish

their purposes are left unessayed. The friends of government, who

are anxious to maintain its neutrality, and to preserve the

country in peace, and adopt measures to secure these objects, are

charged by them as being monarchists, aristocrats, and infractors

of the Constitution, which, according to their interpretation of

it, would be a mere cipher. They arrogated to themselves the sole

merit of being the friends of France, when in fact they had no

more regard for that nation than for the Grand Turk, farther than

their own views were promoted by it; denouncing those who

differed in opinion, (whose principles are purely American, and

whose sole view was to observe a strict neutrality,) as acting

under British influence, and being directed by her counsels, or

as being her pensioners." [Footnote 84]

[Footnote 84: Washington's Writings,

Vol. XI. p. 378,]

{142}

"If the conduct of these men is viewed with indifference; if

there are activity and misrepresentation on one side, and

supineness on the other, their numbers accumulated by intriguing

and discontented foreigners under proscription, who were at war

with their own governments, and the greater part of them with

_all_ governments, they will increase, and nothing short of

Omniscience can foretell the consequences." [Footnote 85]

[Footnote 85: Washington's Writings,

Vol. XI. p. 390.]

In the midst of this pressing danger, Jefferson, who was little

inclined to engage any further in the contest, and who had

announced his intention six months before, and had only delayed

putting it in execution at the solicitation of Washington

himself, peremptorily withdrew from the cabinet.

The crisis was a formidable one. A general agitation spread

throughout the country. The western counties of Pennsylvania

resisted with violence the tax on distilled spirits. In Kentucky

and Georgia, warlike insurrections, perhaps excited from abroad,

threatened, on their own authority, to take forcible possession

of Louisiana and Florida, and to engage the nation, in spite of

itself, in a conflict with Spain. The war against the Indians

continued, always difficult and of doubtful issue.

{143}

A new Congress had just assembled, full of respect for

Washington; but yet the House of Representatives showed itself

more reserved in its approbation of his foreign policy, and chose

an opposition Speaker by a majority of ten votes. England desired

to maintain peace with the United States; but, whether she had

doubts of the success of Washington in this system, or acted in

obedience to the dictates of her general policy, or from an

insolent spirit of contempt, she continued and even aggravated

her measures against the commerce of the Americans, whose

irritation also increased in its turn. "It has not been the

smallest of these embarrassments," writes Washington, "that the

domineering spirit of Great Britain should revive again just at

this crisis, and the outrageous and insulting conduct of some of

her officers should combine therewith to play into the hands of

the discontented, and sour the minds of those who are friends to

peace. But this, by the bye." [Footnote 86]

[Footnote 86: Washington's Writings,

Vol. XI. p. 63.]

{144}

It was indeed "by the bye," and without any purpose of taking

advantage of it in order to weaken his policy or to exalt his

merit, that he pointed out the obstacles scattered along his

path. As exempt from vanity as from indecision, he took pains to

surmount, but not to display them. At the time when the

ascendency of the democratic party seem to be assured, when the

federalists themselves were wavering, when severe measures

proposed in Congress against England were about, perhaps, to

render war inevitable, Washington suddenly announced to the

Senate, by a message, that he had just nominated one of the

principal leaders of the federal party, Mr. Jay, Envoy

Extraordinary to the Court of London, in order to attempt to

reconcile the differences between the two nations by the peaceful

instrument of negotiation.

The Senate immediately confirmed his choice. The indignation of

the opposition was at its height. They desired war, and

especially, by means of war, a change of policy. The simple

continuance of the present state of affairs promised to lead to

that result. In so excited a state of feeling, in the midst of

the increasing irritation, a rumor from Europe, a new insult to

the American flag, the slightest circumstance, might cause

hostilities to break out.

{145}

Washington, by his sudden resolution, gave a new turn to events.

The negotiations might be successful; they made it the duty of

the government to await the result. If they failed, he remained

in a position to make war himself, and to control it, without his

policy's receiving a death-blow.

In order to give to his negotiations the authority of a strong

and well-established power, at the same time that he was baffling

the hopes of his enemies as to matters abroad, Washington

resolved to repress their efforts at home. The resistance of some

counties in Pennsylvania to the tax on distilled spirits had

become an open rebellion. He announced, by a proclamation, his

firm purpose of enforcing the execution of the laws; assembled

the militia of Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania

itself; formed them into an army; went in person to the places of

rendezvous, with a determination to take the command himself if

the contest became serious; and did not return to Philadelphia

till he had learned, with certainty, that the insurgents would

not venture to sustain it.

{146}

They dispersed, in point of fact, on the approach of the army, a

detachment of which took up winter quarters in the disaffected

country.

Washington, on this occasion, felt that stern but deep joy,

sometimes granted, in free countries, to a virtuous man who bears

firmly the weight of power. Everywhere, especially in the States

which were near the scene of the insurrection, good citizens were

aware of the danger, and felt their obligation to contribute, by

their own efforts, to the support of the laws. The magistrates

were resolute, the militia zealous; a strong public opinion

silenced the hypocritical sophistries of the advocates of the

insurrection; and Washington did his duty with the approbation

and support of his country. A moderate compensation, indeed, for

the new and bitter trials that awaited him.

At about the same period, his cabinet, which had shared his

labors and his glory, withdrew from him. Hamilton, who was the

object of a hostility always increasing, after having sustained

the contest as long as the success of his plans and his honor

required, compelled at length to think of himself and of his

family, resigned.

{147}

Knox followed his example. Thus Washington was surrounded by none

but new men, who, though devoted to his course of policy, had

much less weight of authority than their predecessors, when Mr.

Jay returned from London, bringing the result of those

negotiations, the mere announcement of which had excited so much

indignation.

The treaty was far from accomplishing all that was to be desired.

It did not settle all the questions, nor secure all the interests

of the United States; but it put an end to the principal

differences of the two nations; it assured the full execution,

hitherto delayed by Great Britain, of the agreements entered into

with her when she had recognized the independence of the country;

it prepared the way for new and more favorable negotiations. In

short, it was peace; an assured peace; one which lessened even

those evils, which it did not remove.

Washington did not hesitate. He had the rare courage to adhere

firmly to a leading principle, and to accept, without a murmur,

the imperfections and inconveniences which accompany success.

{148}

He immediately communicated the treaty to the Senate, who

approved it, with the exception of one article, in regard to

which a modification was to be required of England. The question

still remained in suspense. The opposition made their utmost

efforts. Addresses came from Boston, New York, Baltimore,

Georgetown, &c., expressing disapprobation of the treaty, and

requesting the President not to ratify it. The populace of

Philadelphia assembled in a riotous manner, marched through the

town, carrying the articles of the treaty at the end of a pole,

and formally burned them before the house of the British minister

and consul. Washington, who had gone to pass some days at Mount

Vernon, returned in haste to Philadelphia, and consulted his

cabinet on the question of immediately ratifying the treaty,

without awaiting the arrival from London of the modification

which even the Senate had declared necessary. This step was a

bold one. One member of the cabinet, Randolph, made objections.

Washington went on and ratified the treaty. The British

government agreed to the modification demanded, and in its turn

ratified it.

{149}

There still remained the duty of carrying it into effect, which

required legislative measures and the intervention of Congress.

The contest was renewed in the House of Representatives. Several

times the opposition gained a majority. Washington stood firm, in

the name of the Constitution, which his opponents also appealed

to against him. Finally, at the end of six months, that peace

might not be disturbed, in the general conviction that the

President would be inflexible, the opposition being rather

wearied out than overcome, the measures necessary for carrying

the treaty into effect were adopted by a majority of three votes.

Throughout the country, in public meetings and in newspapers, the

fury of party exceeded all bounds. From all quarters, every day,

addresses full of censure, anonymous letters, invectives,

calumnies, threats, were poured out against Washington. Even his

integrity was scandalously assailed.

He remained unmoved. He replied to the addresses; "My sense of

the treaty has been manifested by its ratification. The

principles on which my sanction was given, have been made public.

I regret the diversity of opinion.

{150}

But whatever qualities, manifested in a long and arduous public

life, have acquired for me the confidence of my fellow-citizens,

let them be assured that they remain unchanged; and that they

will continue to be exerted on every occasion, in which the

honor, the happiness, and welfare of our common country are

immediately involved." [Footnote 87]

[Footnote 87: Washington's Writings,

Vol. XII. p. 212.]

On the attacks of the press, he said; "I did not believe until

lately, that it was within the bounds of probability, hardly

within those of possibility, that while I was using my utmost

exertions to establish a national character of our own,

independent, as far as our obligations and justice would permit,

of every nation of the earth; and wished, by steering a steady

course, to preserve this country from the horrors of a desolating

war, I should be accused of being the enemy of one nation, and

subject to the influence of another; and, to prove it, that every

act of my administration would be tortured, and the grossest and

most insidious misrepresentations of them be made, by giving one

side only of a subject, and that, too, in such exaggerated and

indecent terms as could scarcely be applied to a Nero, a

notorious defaulter, or even to a common pickpocket.

{151}

But enough of this. I have already gone further in the expression

of my feelings than I intended." [Footnote 88]

[Footnote 88: Washington's Writings,

Vol. XI. p. 139.]

Good men, the friends of order and justice, at length perceived

that they were leaving their noble champion exposed, without

defence, to unworthy attacks. In free countries, falsehood stalks

with a bold front; vain would be the attempt to force it to keep

concealed; but it is the duty of truth, also, to lift up its

head; on these terms alone is liberty a blessing. In their turn,

numerous and cordial congratulations, encouraging and grateful

addresses, were presented to Washington. And when the close of

his second presidency approached, in all parts of the Union, even

those where the opposition seemed to prevail, a multitude of

voices were raised, to entreat him to accept a third time the

highest power which the suffrages of his fellow-citizens could

confer.

{152}

But his resolution was fixed. He did not permit even a discussion

of the question. That memorable Farewell Address, in which, as he

was returning into the midst of the people whom he had governed,

he dispensed to them the last teachings of his long-gathered

wisdom, is still, after more than forty years, cherished by them

as an object of remembrance, and almost of tenderness of feeling.

"In offering to you, my countrymen, these counsels of an old

and affectionate friend, I dare not hope they will make the

strong and lasting impression I could wish; that they will

control the usual current of the passions, or prevent our

nation from running the course, which has hitherto marked the

destiny of nations. But, if I may even flatter myself, that

they may be productive of some partial benefit, some occasional

good; that they may now and then recur to moderate the fury of

party spirit, to warn against the mischiefs of foreign

intrigue, to guard against the impostures of pretended

patriotism; this hope will be a full recompense for the

solicitude for your welfare, by which they have been dictated."

[Footnote 89] ...

[Footnote 89: Washington's Writings,

Vol. XII. p. 233.]

{153}

"Though, in reviewing the incidents of my administration, I am

unconscious of intentional error, I am nevertheless too

sensible of my defects not to think it probable that I may have

committed many errors. Whatever they may be, I fervently

beseech the Almighty to avert or mitigate the evils to which

they may tend. I shall also carry with me the hope, that my

country will never cease to view them with indulgence; and

that, after forty-five years of my life dedicated to its

service with an upright zeal, the faults of incompetent

abilities will be consigned to oblivion, as myself must soon be

to the mansions of rest.

"Relying on its kindness in this as in other things, and

actuated by that fervent love towards it, which is so natural

to a man, who views in it the native soil of himself and his

progenitors for several generations; I anticipate with pleasing

expectation that retreat, in which I promise myself to realize,

without alloy, the sweet enjoyment of partaking, in the midst

of my fellow-citizens, the benign influence of good laws under

a free government, the ever favorite object of my heart, and

the happy reward, as I trust, of our mutual cares, labors, and

dangers." [Footnote 90]

[Footnote 90: Washington's Writings,

Vol. XII. pp. 234, 235.]

{154}

What an incomparable example of dignity and modesty! How perfect

a model of that respect for the public and for one's self, which

gives to power its moral grandeur!

Essay on the Character and Influence of Washington in the Revolution of the United States of America · 第 6 / 7 段