XX

The train of powder, however, had been laid by the diplomatic

engagements. Austria-Hungary and Serbia came into collision in the

spring of 1913 over the Scutari incident. In December, 1912, M. Sazonov

had urged Serbia to play a waiting game in order to "deliver a blow at

Austria." But on 4 April, 1913, Baron Beyens reports from Berlin that

the arrogance and contempt with which the Serbs receive the Vienna

Cabinet's protests over Scutari

can only be explained by their belief that St. Petersburg will

support them. The Serbian chargé d'affaires was quite openly saying

here lately that his Government would not have persisted in its

course for the last six months in the face of the Austrian

opposition had they not received encouragement in their course from

the Russian Minister, M. de Hartwig, who is a diplomatist of M.

Isvolsky's school.... M. Sazonov's heart is with his colleagues who

are directing the policy of the Great Powers, but he feels his

influence with the Tsar being undermined by the court-party and the

pan-Slavists. Hence his inconsequent behaviour.

The military activity which the Russian Government displayed in 1913

gives interest to this estimate of M. Sazonov's position. No doubt to

some extent the estimate was correct; M. Sazonov, like Sir E. Grey, was

probably, when it was too late, much disquieted by the events which

marshalled him the way that he was going. In 1914, this military

activity gained extraordinary intensity. The Russian army was put upon a

peace-footing of approximately 1,400,000, "an effective numerical

strength hitherto unprecedented," said the St. Petersburg correspondent

of the London _Times_. From January to June, the Russian Government made

immense purchases of war material. In February, it concluded a loan in

Paris for the improvement of its strategic roads and railways on the

German frontier. Russia, as was generally known at the time, had her eye

on the acquisition of Constantinople; and in the same month, February, a

council of war was held in St. Petersburg to work out "a general

programme of action in order to secure for us a favourable solution of

the historical question of the Straits." In March, the St. Petersburg

newspaper which served as the mouthpiece of the Minister of War,

published an article stating that Russia's strategy would no longer be

"defensive" but "active." Another paper spoke of the time coming when

"the crossing of the Austrian frontier by the Russian army would be an

unavoidable decision." In the same month, Russia raised a heavy tariff

against the importation of German grain and flour; thus bearing out the

evidence of German trade-reports that even at this time Germany was

still exporting grain to Russia--a most extraordinary proceeding for a

nation which contemplated a sudden declaration of war before the next

harvest. In the same month, the Russian Government brought in military

estimates of £97 million. It exercised heavy pressure on the French

Government in the protracted political turmoil over the maintenance of

the Three Years Service law. In April, "trial mobilizations" were begun,

and were continued up to the outbreak of the war. In May, M. Sazonov

informed the Tsar that the British Government "has decided to empower

the British Admiralty Staff to enter into negotiations with French and

Russian naval agents in London for the purpose of drawing technical

conditions for possible action by the naval forces of England, Russia

and France." In the same month, a complete mobilization of all the

reserves of the three annual contingents of 1907-1909 was ordered for

the whole Russian Empire, as a "test," to take place in the autumn. In

the same month the Russian Admiralty instructed its agent in London,

Captain Volkov, as follows:

Our interests on the Northern scene of operations require that

England keeps as large a part of the German fleet as possible in

check in the North Sea.... The English Government could render us a

substantial service if it would agree to send a sufficient number

of boats to our Baltic ports to compensate for our lack of means of

transport, before the beginning of war-operations.

This document, revealed by the Soviet Government in 1919, is pretty

damaging to the assumption of an "unprepared and unsuspecting Europe";

especially as Professor Conybeare has given publicity to the fact that

"before the beginning of war-operations" those English boats were there,

prompt to the minute, empty, ready and waiting.

In June, the Russian Ambassador warned the Russian naval staff in London

that they must exercise great caution in talking about a landing in

Pomerania or about the dispatch of English boats to the Russian Baltic

ports before the outbreak of war, "so that the rest may not be

jeopardized." On 13 June, the newspaper-organ of the Russian Minister

of War published an inspired article under the caption: "Russia is

Ready: France must be Ready."

Two weeks later, the Austrian heir-apparent, the Archduke Francis

Joseph, was murdered at Sarajevo, a town in Bosnia, by Serbian officers.

The murder was arranged by the Serbian Major Tankesitch, of the

pan-Slavist organization known as the Black Hand; and this organization

was fostered, if not actually subsidized, by the Russian Minister at

Belgrade, M. Hartwig, the pupil and _alter ego_ of M. Isvolsky, and the

architect and promoter of the Balkan League!

The Myth of a Guilty Nation · 第 34 / 35 题