The Lords States General (in many respects like our Congress, composed

of the Senate and House of Representatives) was the legislative body of

the Netherlands, and in June, 1621, granted a charter to the Dutch West

India Company, giving it the exclusive privileges, for a period of

twenty-four years, as follows: To traffic on the coast and in the

interior of Africa from the Tropic of Cancer to the Cape of Good Hope;

in America and the West Indies with the power to make engagements,

contracts, and alliances with the rulers and people designated in the

charter; to build forts, to appoint and discharge officers, to advance

the settlement of unoccupied territory, to enlarge the channels of

commerce, and to multiply the sources of revenue.

The company was required to report, from time to time, its doings, and

in the appointment of civil and military officers and instructions given

to them the Lords States General were to be consulted and the

commissions must bear their seal. If troops were needed the Lords States

General would furnish them but the company must pay all the expenses.

The charter intrusted the government of the company to five chambers of

managers consisting of nineteen members, eight from the Amsterdam

Chamber, four from the Zealand, two from the Maas, two from North

Holland, two from the Frieland, and the government one.

This company, under its charter, introduced the Patroon system granting

certain rights and privileges (very liberal ones and in some respects

extraordinary) and reserving the traffic in furs and peltry and in

manufactured goods and in the carrying trade, except along the Atlantic

coast, in which the Patroons might engage, paying a fixed tribute.

The colonists might, with the permission of the Patroon and of the

director of the Dutch West India Company, take up what unoccupied land

they could work, paying an annual rent to the Patroon. That rent was

based upon the value of land primarily and was to be paid in so many

bushels of wheat, rye, etc., so many pounds of butter, so many eggs and

so many chickens, etc. Everything the colonists had to sell must first

be offered to the Patroon. The Dutch West India Company was to furnish

the Patroons troops if needed as against the colonies, the expense to be

met by the landlords. The colonists couldn't leave the Patroon's service

during the term fixed. The value of the land before cultivation and

buildings ranged usually from ten cents to two dollars per acre. The

tenant improved the land, built house and barn to live comfortably, and

what was called "the Quarter Sale" seemed the most unreasonable,

intolerable. To illustrate: Suppose the tenant occupied a farm

originally valued at $2 an acre for 200 acres, say $400. He had improved

it by cultivation, buildings, etc., until it became worth and he sold it

for $4,000. Then the Patroon demanded $1,000. Four sales would give the

Patroon the whole. The rent, of course, was paid annually, or should

have been, and if there were arrears the Patroon claimed that that must

come out of the remaining $3,000.

The Netherlands primarily based their claim for the territory called New

Netherlands on Henry Hudson's discovery (so called) of five degrees of

north latitude, viz.: from 40° to 45° or from Delaware bay and river to

Cape Cod, where he touched or explored in 1609. Great Britain claimed

under the Cabots' discoveries, in 1497 and 1498, the whole stretch of

the North Atlantic coast from Florida to Newfoundland. The French

claimed a portion of northern Florida, which subsequently became a part

(the sea coast) of Georgia, and the Spanish the rest of Florida.

Virginia, under the English, late in the sixteenth and early in the

seventeenth centuries, extended from Cape Fear up to what later became

the southern boundary of Pennsylvania, and New England extended from

Virginia to Nova Scotia. From 1609 until 1664 the Dutch held the New

Netherlands and then were compelled to surrender the territory to the

English under the grant of Charles II to James, his brother, the Duke of

York and Albany, who, in 1685, became King of England under the title of

James III. Great Britain never recognized the Dutch claim--always

protested against it--but being engaged in wars almost constantly did

not use force to obtain possession before. "It had become important to

dislodge the Dutch to prevent the smuggling of Virginia tobacco into

England at a loss to that government of some $50,000 in customs, and

also to have an unbroken line of English colonies from Florida to Nova

Scotia." The Dutch did not rely solely on Hudson's voyage on the Hudson,

but none of their claims had validity and the colony of New Netherlands

passed under British rule and the Patroon took the oath of allegiance to

the English King, and English laws instead of Dutch henceforth prevailed

in the colony.

As soon as the Patroons began to plant colonies in New Netherlands the

directors of the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company

became jealous and opposed the Patroon system. In 1634 they bought off

the two Patroons, Samuel Godyn and Samuel Blommaert (partners of Kiliaen

Van Rensselaer), who had secured a tract on the shore of the Delaware

bay making a territory of sixty-four miles in circumference, and also

Michael Pauw, who had obtained Staten Island, Jersey City, and Harsimus,

with the lands adjacent. An effort was made to buy off Patroon Van

Rensselaer, but he refused to sell.

While the New England colonies were rapidly increasing in population and

prosperity, the New Netherlands was not. In 1647 the population of the

New Netherlands was only about 1,000 or 2,000 less than in 1643. A new

policy was ordered by the Lords States General so liberal that settlers

could buy as few acres as they wished to and enjoy civil and religious

freedom as did the English colonies north and south of them. Under the

Patroon régime the Dutch colonists had less freedom, the enjoyment of

fewer rights, and greater hardships to endure than in Holland. They

were, as they saw things, imposed upon and serving masters who regarded

them as slaves.

The gulf between the classes and the masses seemed to widen and

deepen--on one side, lords and masters, and on the other side, subjects

and serfs. The Patroon family of the Van Rensselaers by marriage and

intermarriage were related to the Van Cortlands, Schuylers, Livingstons,

and other wealthy families, not only in New Netherlands but also in

Virginia, and although they had not castles, as the barons along the

Rhine, they had spacious mansions on their country estates where they

spent their summers and in the winters went to Manhattan Island and in

their places there gave royal entertainments to the élite. They had a

retinue of black servants (slaves) in livery to attend them. The

transplanting of the feudal system, even though somewhat modified, to

the western world, where the very spirit of freedom, liberty, and

equality prevailed, was doomed to failure and disaster. The principal

cause was in the system itself, though the Van Rensselaer Patroons'

course hastened its abrogation, terminating in blood. The most of the

Van Rensselaer Patroons were liberal, lenient, and indulgent, permitting

the rents to remain unpaid until they amounted to a sum equal to, or in

some cases exceeding, the value of the leased land. It needed not the

wisdom of a prophet to predict trouble from this course. When

primogeniture was abolished the eldest son was no longer the inheritor

of the estate, but all the children shared in it. Stephen (3d) Van

Rensselaer, the seventh Patroon, born in 1764 and died in 1839, was in

fact the last of the Van Rensselaer Patroons. He was graduated in

Harvard in 1782, a doctor of laws, the recipient of many and

distinguished civil and military honors, and a devoted patriot, called

"the good old Patroon," as soon as the law of primogeniture was

abolished sought to dispose of the most of the Rensselaerwyck estate

(which had been somewhat lessened by grants and sales) under a peculiar

form of deed or conveyance to actual tillers of the soil. This title

deed was called by some "a lease in fee" and by others "a sale in fee,"

reserving to himself in the conveyances and to his heirs and assigns all

mines and minerals and all streams of water for mill purposes; and then

certain old-time feudal returns, denominated rents payable annually at

the manor house in Watervliet, such as a specified number of bushels of

good clean wheat, four fat fowls, one day's service with carriages and

horses, and finally the one-quarter part of the purchase price on every

sale of land. The aim and intent was to perpetuate, if possible, and as

far as possible, the interest of the Van Rensselaers in the estate. The

estate remaining was divided by the two eldest sons, Stephen 4th getting

that on the west side and William Patterson Van Rensselaer that on the

east side of the Hudson river, and each all the reservations of rents in

their respective territories. "In 1839, when the said Stephen and

William Patterson began to push their claim against the landholders and

demand immediate payment of back rents, etc., the landholders, called

'anti-renters,' held a convention and appointed a committee to wait on

Stephen Van Rensselaer and ascertain if an amicable settlement of the

manor claims for rents in arrears could not be made and to learn on what

terms a clear and absolute title to the land could be had. The

committee, men of character, went to the manor office in 1839 to see and

converse with Mr. Van Rensselaer, but the latter refused to recognize or

even see the committee. He did, some time subsequently, send a letter to

the chairman of that committee declining to sell on any terms. Great

excitement was created in Albany county. The rent collectors were

roughly treated and they were told that no rents would be paid. Sheriffs

were called upon to discharge their duties and they were resisted and

driven back by men masked and dressed in Indian costumes. The sheriff

called to aid him the 'posse comitatus,' or power of the county, and

marched 600 strong into the anti-rent district, where they were turned

back by 1,500 anti-renters. The sheriff reported the state of affairs to

Governor William H. Seward, who immediately ordered out eight companies

of militia under the command of Major Bloodgood. They met no resistance.

"The Patroon interest hoped the military ordered out by the Governor of

the State would bring the anti-renters to their senses and induce them

to pay up. The landholders or anti-renters hoped that their display of

strength and resistance would induce the Van Rensselaers to offer terms

of compromise which they could accept. Neither hope was realized. Then

some lawyer who had dug into old English law books said the Patroon

patent was invalid and the matter must go to the court for settlement.

It became a political question at once. The anti-renters elected

representatives in the Legislature from eleven counties and the new

Governor favored them. The decisions of the courts seemed to alternate

in favor of the Van Rensselaers and then in favor of the anti-renters.

In 1852 the counsel of the Van Rensselaers advised them to sell their

claims, for they believed they could not be sustained and that advice

was accepted. Some of the landholders or anti-renters accepted the terms

offered.

"Then appeared Walter S. Church, who bought the rest of the claims on

speculation. He spared no labor, no expense in any direction which he

thought might aid him. He magnificently entertained legislators,

lawyers, and judges. He was indefatigable, exacting, demanding the

utmost farthing. Ejectment suits were brought and several lives were

sacrificed. The final decision was against the Van Rensselaers, and thus

ended a long and bitter controversy growing out of the Patroon system."

Who can estimate and properly accredit to the different nations of

Europe their just due in the immigrants they sent to this country in its

founding and subsequently in building up the United States as the

greatest free republic on earth and the hope of the liberty-loving

world? The Dutch must be among the early named with excellent traits of

character, and the Patroons deserve credit for first colonizing them

here.

We do not want to try to conjecture what the results would have been if

Hudson's exploration of the North river had been in the interest of

France or if the Pilgrims had settled in 1620 in the New Netherlands

instead of New England.

Nearly 300 years have passed away since Henry Hudson, in the yacht "Half

Moon," sailed over the waters of the river bearing his name and whose

beauties he so greatly admired. That majestic, noble river continues to

flow on from the mountains to the sea with a great unabated pure stream

in its primeval beauty and loveliness. This statement must, however, be

qualified, for man's greed, cupidity, has caused him in some localities

to contaminate its waters and to mar and to an extent destroy its

matchless palisades. Now that the governments have taken matters in hand

it is to be hoped that these abuses will be summarily ended.

Art and architecture have embellished its banks by lovely gardens,

parterres and magnificent residences and stately buildings. Attractive

villages, great and prosperous cities crown the Hudson from the north

and terminating in that unique, wonderful, greatest, truly cosmopolitan

city of the world, New York. Nothing else did so much to produce these

results as Fulton's application of steam to navigation and the opening

up of a through water transportation route from the Atlantic to the

Great lakes. Then the application of steam as the motive power for

railroads. When the Hudson river is ice-bound the Hudson River Railroad

along its east bank and the West Shore Railroad along its west bank

transport passengers and freight as they do the year around. The Dutch

possession of the New Netherlands was short and when the English

supplanted them the Dutch names of places, very generally, were changed

to English ones. Manhattan island, called by the Dutch "New Amsterdam"

during their rule, except from July, 1673, to October, 1674, when the

Dutch recaptured and held the "New Netherlands" and called it "New

Orange," was changed to New York in honor of the Duke of York and

Albany, and has borne that name ever since--a city of many millions of

inhabitants and billions of wealth, the site of which was bought by and

for the Dutch of the Indians in 1626 for the sum of about twenty-four

dollars paid for in trinkets. Among many other good things placed to the

credit of the Dutch in New Netherlands is the fact that the Dutch West

India Company established a good school in New Amsterdam in 1633 which

still flourishes under the name of the "School of the Collegiate

Reformed Church," which is the oldest institution of learning in the

United States, "The Boston Latin School," established in 1635, being the

second, and Harvard College, established in 1636, the third.

The names of the site of Albany which, during Dutch rule, were

Rensselaerwyck and Beverwyck (the latter including Fort Orange, built

and maintained by the Dutch West India Company, and the land surrounding

it, and the former the territory outside of the fort and belonging to

the Patroon) were substituted by the name of Albany in honor of the Duke

of York and Albany, a name it has borne ever since.

In 1783 the English colonies in North America were recognized as free

and independent and formed the United States of America--the colonies

organizing State governments--but 100 years before this the colony of

New York demanded heaven-born rights and participation in making the

laws governing them as the colonists of Virginia and Massachusetts had,

and in the General Assembly of the colony of New York, held in Fort

James in the city of New York October, 1683, put on record what they

called the "Charter of Liberties and Privileges."

The ten original counties of the colony of New York were Albany, Ulster,

Dutchess, Orange, Westchester, Richmond, Kings, Queens, Suffolk, and New

York, formed under Lieutenant-Governor Thomas Dongan's administration,

and sent representatives to the General Assembly. The boundaries of

several of these counties have not been materially changed, Albany

county embraced the whole territory lying north of Ulster and west of

the Hudson river, taking in nearly the whole State. From its territory

fifty of the counties of the State have been erected and it has

appropriately been called "the mother of the counties of New York."

Albanians love their old Dutch city and will cordially join in

commemorating Henry Hudson's advent to it nearly 300 years ago. Much has

been said in this article about the Patroon system and the anti-renters,

hoping to have these matters better understood by a statement of facts.

Concerning affairs relating to Albany and vicinity, I have frequently

referred to, quoted and used "Mr. Wiese's History of the City of

Albany," 1884, and the "Bi-centennial History of Albany and Schenectady

Counties from 1609 to 1886, published by W. W. Munsell & Co., 1886."

The article on "Anti-Rentism" was written by the Hon. Andrew J. Colvin.

FRANK CHAMBERLAIN.

All rights reserved.

Albany, _September, 1907_.

Transcriber's Notes

--Retained publication information from the printed edition: this eBook

is public-domain in the country of publication.

--Silently corrected a few palpable typos.

--In the text versions only, text in italics is delimited by

_underscores_.

End of Project Gutenberg's Hudson Tercentenary, by Frank Chamberlain

Hudson Tercentenary An historical retrospect regarding the object and quest of an all-water route from Europe to India; the obstacles in the way; and also Hudson's voyage to America in 1609 and some of its results · 第 4 / 4 段