At this juncture Angel de Villafañe’s fleet entered the harbor of

Ichuse. He announced to the people that he was on his way to Santa

Elena, which Tristan de Luna had made an ineffectual effort to reach.

All who chose were at liberty to accompany him. The desire to evacuate

the country where they had suffered so severely was universal. None

expressed a wish to remain; and Tristan de Luna, seeing himself utterly

abandoned, embarked for Havana with a few servants. Villafañe then took

on board all except a detachment of fifty or sixty men who were left at

Ichuse under Captain Biedma, with orders to remain five or six months;

at the expiration of which time they were to sail away also, in case no

instructions came.

Villafañe, with the “San Juan” and three other vessels and about two

hundred men, put into Havana; but there many of the men deserted, and

several officers refused to proceed.[877]

With Gonzalo Gayon as pilot, Villafañe reached Santa Elena—now Port

Royal Sound—May 27, 1561, and took possession in the name of the

King of Spain. Finding no soil adapted for cultivation, and no port

suitable for planting a settlement, he kept along the coast, doubled

Cape Roman, and landing on the 2d of June, went inland till he reached

the Santee, where he again took formal possession. On the 8th he was

near the Jordan or Pedee; but a storm drove off one of his vessels.

With the rest he continued his survey of the coast till he doubled Cape

Hatteras. There, on the 14th of June, his caravel well-nigh foundered,

and his two smaller vessels undoubtedly perished. He is said to have

abandoned the exploration of the coast here, although apparently it was

his vessel, with the Dominican Fathers, which about this time visited

Axacan, on the Chesapeake, and took off a brother of the chief.[878]

Villafañe then sailed to Santo Domingo, and Florida was abandoned. In

fact, on the 23d of September the King declared that no further attempt

was to be made to colonize that country, either in the Gulf or at

Santa Elena, alleging that there was no ground to fear that the French

would set foot in that land or take possession of it; and the royal

order cites the opinion of Pedro Menendez against any attempt to form

settlements on either coast.[879]

As if to show the fallacy of their judgment and their forecast, the

French (and what was worse, from the Spanish point of view, French

Calvinists) in the next year, under Ribault, took possession of Port

Royal,—the very Santa Elena which Villafañe considered unfitted for

colonization. Here they founded Charlesfort and a settlement, entering

Port Royal less than three months after the Spanish officers convened

in Mexico had united in condemning the country.

Pedro Menendez de Aviles had, as we have seen, been general of the

fleet to New Spain in 1560, and on his return received instructions

to examine the Atlantic coast north of the very spot where the French

thus soon after settled. In 1561 he again commanded the fleet; but on

his homeward voyage a terrible storm scattered the vessels near the

Bermudas, and one vessel, on which his only son and many of his kinsmen

had embarked, disappeared. With the rest of his ships he reached

Spain, filled with anxiety, eager only to fit out vessels to seek his

son, who, he believed, had been driven on the Florida coast, and was

probably a prisoner in the hands of the Indians. At this critical

moment, however, charges were brought against him; and he, with his

brother, was arrested and detained in prison for two years, unable to

bring the case to trial, or to obtain his release on bail.

When Menendez at last succeeded in obtaining an audience of the King,

he solicited, in 1564, permission to proceed with two vessels to

Bermuda and Florida to seek his son, and then retire to his home, which

he had not seen for eighteen years. Philip II. at last consented; but

required him to make a thorough coast-survey of Florida, so as to

prepare charts that would prevent the wrecks which had arisen from

ignorance of the real character of the sea-line. Menendez replied that

his Majesty could confer no higher boon upon him for his long and

successful services on the seas than to authorize him to conquer and

settle Florida.

Nothing could be in greater accordance with the royal views than to

commit to the energy of Menendez[880] the task which so many others

had undertaken in vain. A patent, or _asiento_, was issued March 20,

1565, by the provisions of which Menendez was required to sail in May

with ten vessels, carrying arms and supplies, and five hundred men,

one hundred to be capable of cultivating the soil. He was to take

provisions to maintain the whole force for a year, and was to conquer

and settle Florida within three years; explore and map the coast,

transport settlers, a certain number of whom were to be married;

maintain twelve members of religious Orders as missionaries, besides

four of the Society of Jesus; and to introduce horses, black cattle,

sheep, and swine for the two or three distinct settlements he was

required to found at his own expense.[881] The King gave only the use

of the galleon “San Pelayo,” and bestowed upon Menendez the title

of _Adelantado_ of Florida, a personal grant of twenty-five leagues

square, with the title of Marquis, and the office of Governor and

Captain-General of Florida.

While Menendez was gathering, among his kindred in Asturias and

Biscay, men and means to fulfil his part of the undertaking, the

Court of Spain became aware for the first time that the Protestants

of France had quietly planted a colony on that very Florida coast.

Menendez was immediately summoned in haste to Court; and orders were

issued to furnish him in America three vessels fully equipped, and an

expeditionary force of two hundred cavalry and four hundred infantry.

Menendez urged, on the contrary, that he should be sent on at once

with some light vessels to attack the French; or, if that was not

feasible, to occupy a neighboring port and fortify it, while awaiting

reinforcements. The Government, by successive orders, increased the

Florida armament, so that Menendez finally sailed from Cadiz, June

29, with the galleon “San Pelayo” and other vessels to the number of

nineteen, carrying more than fifteen hundred persons, including farmers

and mechanics of all kinds.

The light in which Spaniards, especially those connected with commerce

and colonies, regarded the Protestants of France was simply that of

pirates. French cruisers, often making their Protestantism a pretext

for their actions, scoured the seas, capturing Spanish and Portuguese

vessels, and committing the greatest atrocities. In 1555 Jacques Sorie

surprised Havana, plundered it, and gave it to the flames, butchering

the prisoners who fell into his hands. In 1559 Megander pillaged Porto

Rico, and John de la Roche plundered the ships and settlements near

Carthagena.[882]

It seems strange, however, that neither in Spain nor in America was it

known that this dreaded and hated community, the Huguenots of France,

had actually, in 1562, begun a settlement at the very harbor of Santa

Elena where Villafañe had taken possession in the name of the Spanish

monarch a year before. Some of the French settlers revolted, and very

naturally went off to cruise against the Spaniards, and with success;

but the ill-managed colony of Charlesfort on Port Royal Sound had

terminated its brief existence without drawing down the vengeance of

Spain.

When the tidings of a French occupancy of Florida startled the Spanish

Court, a second attempt of the Huguenots at settlement had been

made,—this time at the mouth of St. John’s River, where Fort Caroline

was a direct menace to the rich Spanish fleets, offering a safe refuge

to cruisers, which in the name of a pure gospel could sally out to

plunder and to slay. Yet that settlement, thus provoking the fiercest

hostility of Spain, was ill-managed. It was, in fact, sinking, like

its predecessor, from the unfitness of its members to make the teeming

earth yield them its fruits for their maintenance. René Laudonnière,

the commandant, after receiving some temporary relief from the English

corsair Hawkins,[883] and learning that the Spaniards meditated

hostilities, was about to burn his fort and abandon the country, when

John Ribault arrived as commandant, with supplies and colonists, as

well as orders to maintain the post. His instructions from Coligny

clearly intended that he should attack the Spaniards.[884]

The two bitter antagonists, each stimulated by his superiors, were thus

racing across the Atlantic, each endeavoring to outstrip the other,

so as to be able first to assume the offensive. The struggle was to

be a deadly one, for on neither side were there any of the ordinary

restraints; it was to be a warfare without mercy.

After leaving the Canaries, Menendez’ fleet was scattered by storms.

One vessel put back; the flagship and another were driven in one

direction, five vessels in another. These, after encountering another

storm, finally reached Porto Rico on the 9th of August, and found the

flagship and its tender there.[885]

The other ships from Biscay and Asturias had not arrived; but Menendez,

fearing that Ribault might outstrip him, resolved to proceed, though

his vessels needed repairs from the injuries sustained in the storm. If

he was to crush Fort Caroline, he felt that it must be done before the

French post was reinforced; if not, all the force at his disposal would

be insufficient to assume the offensive. He made the coast of Florida

near Cape Cañaveral on the 25th of August; and soon after, by landing

a party, ascertained from the natives that the French post was to the

northward. Following the coast in that direction, he discovered, on

the 28th, a harbor which seemed to possess advantages, and to which he

gave the name of the great Bishop of Hippo, Augustine, who is honored

on that day. Sailing on cautiously, he came in sight of the mouth of

the St. John’s River about two o’clock in the afternoon of the 4th of

September. The ten days he had lost creeping along the coast were fatal

to his project, for there lay the four vessels of Ribault, the flagship

and its consort flinging to the breeze the colors of France.

Menendez’ officers in council were in favor of running back to

Santo Domingo till the whole force was united and ready to assume

the offensive; but Menendez inspired them with his own intrepidity,

and resolved to attack at once. A tremendous thunderstorm prevented

operations till ten at night, when he bore down on the French, and ran

his ship, the “Pelayo,” between the two larger vessels of Ribault. To

his hail who they were and what they were doing there, the reply was

that John Ribault was their captain-general, and that they came to the

country by order of the King of France; and the French in return asked

what ships they were, and who commanded them. To quote his own words,

“I replied to them that I was Peter Menendez, that I came by command of

the King of Spain to this coast and land to burn and hang the French

Lutherans found in it, and that in the morning I would board his ships

to know whether he belonged to that sect; because if he did, I could

not avoid executing on them the justice which his Majesty commanded.

They replied that this was not right, and that I might go without

awaiting the morning.”

[Illustration: FLORIDA.

[This sketch-map of the scene of the operations of the Spanish and

the French follows one given by Fairbanks in his _History of St.

Augustine_. Other modern maps, giving the old localities, are found in

Parkman, Gaffarel etc.—ED.]]

As Menendez manœuvred to get a favorable position, the French vessels

cut their cables and stood out to sea. The Spaniards gave chase,

rapidly firing five cannon at Ribault’s flagship,—which Menendez

supposed that he injured badly, as boats put off to the other vessels.

Finding that the French outsailed him, Menendez put back, intending

to land soldiers on an island at the mouth of the river and fortify a

position which would command the entrance; but as he reached the St.

John’s he saw three French vessels coming out, ready for action.

[Illustration: SITE OF FORT CAROLINE.

[After a map in Fairbanks’s _History of St. Augustine_; but his view of

the site is open to question.—ED.]]

His project was thus defeated; and too wily to be caught at a

disadvantage by the returning French vessels, Menendez bore away to the

harbor of St. Augustine, which he estimated at eight leagues from the

French by sea, and six by land. Here he proceeded to found the oldest

city in the present territory of the United States.

[Illustration: ST. AUGUSTINE.

[This view of Pagus Hispanorum, as given in Montanus and Ogilby,

represents the town founded by Menendez at a somewhat later period, if

it is wholly truthful of any period. The same view was better engraved

at Leide by Vander Aa.—ED.]]

Two hundred mail-clad soldiers, commanded by Captain John de San

Vicente and Captain Patiño, landed on the 6th of September, 1565.

The Indians were friendly, and readily gave the settlers the large

house of one of the caciques which stood near the shore of the river.

Around this an intrenchment was traced; and a ditch was soon dug, and

earthworks thrown up, with such implements as they had at hand, for the

vessel bearing their tools had not yet arrived.

[Illustration: SPANISH VESSELS.

(_From the_ PAGUS HISPANORUM _in Montanus_.)]

The next day three of the smaller vessels ran into the harbor, and

from them three hundred more of the soldiers disembarked, as well as

those who had come to settle in the country,—men, women, and children.

Artillery and munitions for the fort were also landed. The eighth

being a holiday in the Catholic Church,—the Nativity of the Blessed

Virgin,—was celebrated with due solemnity. Mass was offered for the

first time at a spot ever after held in veneration, and where in time

arose the primitive shrine of Nuestra Señora de la Leche.

Then the work of debarkation was resumed; one hundred more persons

landed; and great guns, precious stores of provisions, and munitions

were brought to the new fort.

[Illustration: THE BUILDING OF FORT CAROLINE.]

[Illustration: FORT CAROLINE COMPLETED.

(_Lemoyne, in De Bry._)

[Two pictures of Fort Caroline accompany the _Brevis narratio_ of

Lemoyne,—one the beginning of work upon it, and the other the completed

structure, “a more finished fortification than could possibly have

been constructed, but to be taken as a correct outline,” as Fairbanks

(p. 54) presumes. The engraving of the completed fort is reproduced

in Fairbanks’s _St. Augustine_, Stevens’s _Georgia_, etc. Another and

better view of it, called “Arx Carolina—Charlesfort sur Floride,” was

engraved at Leide by Vander Aa, but it is a question if it be truthful.

No traces of the fort have ever been recorded by subsequent observers,

but Fairbanks places it near a place called St. John’s Bluff, as shown

in the accompanying map. Others have placed it on the Bell River (an

estuary of the St. Mary’s River), at a place Called Battle Bluff. Cf.

Carroll’s _Hist. Coll._, i. p. xxxvi.—ED.]]

Amid all this bustle and activity the Spaniards were startled by the

appearance of two large French vessels[886] in the offing, evidently

ready for action. It was no part of Menendez’ plan to engage them, and

he waited till, about three in the afternoon, they bore away for the

St. John’s. Then he prepared to land in person. As his boat left the

vessel with banners unfurled, amid the thunder of cannon and the sounds

of warlike music, Mendoza Grajales, the first priest of St. Augustine,

bearing a cross, went down at the head of those on shore to meet the

_adelantado_, all chanting the Te Deum. Menendez proceeded at once with

his attendants to the cross, which he kissed on bended knee.

Formal possession of the land was then taken in the name of Philip II.,

King of Spain. The captains of the troops and the officers of the new

colony came forward to take the oath to Peter Menendez de Aviles as

governor, captain-general, and _adelantado_ of Florida and its coasts

under the patents of the Spanish King. Crowds of friendly Indians, with

their chieftains, gathered around.

From them the Spanish commander learned that his position was admirably

taken, as he could, at a short distance, strike the river on which the

French lay, and descend it to assail them. Here then he resolved to

make his position as strong as possible, till the rest of his armament

arrived. His galleon “San Pelayo,” too large to enter the port, rode

without, in danger from the sudden storms that visit the coast, and

from the French. Putting on board some French prisoners whom he had

captured in a boat, he despatched her and another vessel to Santo

Domingo. He organized his force by appointing officers,—a lieutenant

and a sergeant-major, and ten captains. The necessity of horses to

operate rapidly induced him to send two of his lighter vessels to

Havana to seek them there; and by this conveyance he addressed to

Philip II. his first letter from Florida.[887]

The masts of his vessels could scarcely have vanished from the eyes

of the Spanish force, when the French vessels appeared once more, and

nearly captured Menendez himself in the harbor, where he was carrying

to the shore, in the smaller vessels that he had retained, some

artillery and munitions from the galleons. He escaped, however, though

the French were so near that they called on him to surrender. And he

ascribed his deliverance rather to prayer than to human skill; for,

fierce seaman as he was, he was a man of deep and practical religious

feeling, which influenced all his actions.

Menendez’ position was now one of danger. The force at his command

was not large, and the French evidently felt strong enough, and were

determined to attack him. He had acknowledged his inability to cope

with them on the ocean, and could not have felt very sanguine of being

able to defend the slight breastworks that had been thrown up at St.

Augustine.

Fortune favored him. Ribault, after so earnestly determining to

assume the offensive, fatally hesitated. Within two days a tremendous

hurricane, which the practised eye of Menendez had anticipated, burst

on the coast. The French were, he believed, still hovering near, on the

lookout for his larger vessels, and he knew that with such a norther

their peril was extreme. It was, moreover, certain that they could not,

for a time at least, make the St. John’s, even if they rode out the

storm.

This gave him a temporary superiority, and he resolved to seize his

opportunity. Summoning his officers to a council of war, he laid before

them his plan of marching at once to attack Fort Caroline, from which

the French had evidently drawn a part of their force, and probably

their most effective men. The officers generally, as well as the two

clergymen in the settlement, opposed his project as rash; but Menendez

was determined. Five hundred men—three hundred armed with arquebuses,

the rest with pikes and targets—were ordered to march, each one

carrying rations of biscuit and wine. Menendez, at their head, bore

his load like the rest. They marched out of the fort on the 16th of

September, guided by two caciques who had been hostile to the French,

and by a Frenchman who had been two years in the fort. The route proved

one of great difficulty; the rain poured in torrents, swelling the

streams and flooding the lowlands, so that the men were most of the

time knee-deep in water. Many loitered, and, falling back, made their

way to St. Augustine. Others showed a mutinous disposition, and loudly

expressed their contempt for their sailor-general.

On the 29th, at the close of the day, he was within a short distance of

the French fort, and halted to rest so as to storm it in the morning.

At daybreak the Spaniards knelt in prayer; then, bearing twenty

scaling-ladders, Menendez advanced, his sturdy Asturians and Biscayans

in the van. Day broke as, in a heavy rain, they reached a height from

which their French guide told them they could see the fort, washed by

the river. Menendez advanced, and saw some houses and the St. John’s;

but from his position could not discover the fort. He would have gone

farther; but the Maese de Campo and Captain Ochoa pushed on till they

reached the houses, and reconnoitred the fort, where not a soul seemed

astir. As they returned they were hailed by a French sentinel, who took

them for countrymen. Ochoa sprang upon him, striking him on the head

with his sheathed sword, while the Maese de Campo stabbed him. He

uttered a cry; but was threatened with death, bound, and taken back.

The cry had excited Menendez, who, supposing that his officers had been

killed, called out: “Santiago! at them! God helps us! Victory! The

French are slaughtered! Don Pedro de Valdes, the Maese de Campo, is in

the fort, and has taken it!”

The men, supposing that the officers were in advance with part of the

force, rushed on till they came up with the returning officers, who,

taking in the situation, despatched the sentry and led the men to the

attack. Two Frenchmen, who rushed out in their shirts, were cut down.

Others outside the fort seeing the danger, gave the alarm; and a man

at the principal gate threw it open to ascertain what the trouble was.

Valdes, ready to scale the fort, saw the advantage, sprang on the man

and cut him down, then rushed into the fort, followed by the fleetest

of the Spanish detachment. In a moment two captains had simultaneously

planted their colors on the walls, and the trumpets sounded for victory.

The French, taken utterly by surprise, made no defence; about fifty,

dashing over the walls of the fort, took to the woods, almost naked,

and unarmed, or endeavored in boats and by swimming to reach the

vessels in the stream. When Menendez came up with the main body, his

men were slaughtering the French as they ran shrieking through the

fort, or came forward declaring that they surrendered. The women, and

children under the age of fifteen, were, by orders of the commander,

spared. Laudonnière, the younger Ribault, Lemoyne, and the carpenter Le

Challeux, whose accounts have reached us, were among those who escaped.

Menendez had carried the fort without one of his men being killed or

wounded. The number of the French thus unsparingly put to the sword

is stated by Menendez himself as one hundred and thirty-two, with ten

of the fugitives who were butchered the next day. Mendoza Grajales

corroborates this estimate. Fifty were spared, and about as many

escaped to the vessels; and some, doubtless, perished in the woods.

The slaughter was too terrible to need depicting in darker colors; but

in time it was declared that Menendez hung many, with an insulting

label: “I do not this to Frenchmen, but to Heretics.” The Spanish

accounts, written with too strong a conviction of the propriety of

their course to seek any subterfuge, make no allusion to any such

act; and the earliest French accounts are silent in regard to it. The

charge first occurs in a statement written with an evident design to

rouse public indignation in France, and not, therefore, to be deemed

absolutely accurate.

No quarter was given, for the French were regarded as pirates; and as

the French cruisers gave none, these, who were considered as of the

same class, received none.

The booty acquired was great. A brigantine and a galiot fell into

the hands of the Spaniards, with a vessel that had grounded. Another

vessel lay near the fort, and Spanish accounts claim to have sunk it

with the cannon of the fort, while the French declare they scuttled

it. Two other vessels lay at the mouth of the river, watching for the

Spaniards, whose attack was expected from the sea, and not from the

land side. Besides these vessels and their contents, the Spaniards

gained in the fort artillery and small-arms, supplies of flour and

bread, horses, asses, sheep, and hogs.[888] Such was the first struggle

on our soil between civilized men; it was brief, sanguinary, merciless.

Menendez named the captured fort San Mateo, from its capture on the

feast of St. Matthew (September 21). He set up the arms of Spain, and

selected a site for a church, which he ordered to be built at once.

Then, leaving Gonçalo de Villaroel in command, with a garrison of three

hundred men, he prepared to march back to St. Augustine with about one

hundred, who composed the rest of the force which had remained with him

till he reached Caroline. But of them all he found only thirty-five

able or willing to undertake the march; and with these he set out,

deeming his presence necessary at St. Augustine. Before long, one of

the party pushed on to announce his coming.

The Spaniards there had learned of the disaster which had befallen

Ribault’s fleet from a Frenchman who was the sole survivor of one small

vessel that had been driven ashore, its crew escaping a watery death

only to perish by the hands of the Indians. The vessel was secured and

brought to St. Augustine. The same day, September 23, a man was seen

running toward the fort, uttering loud shouts. The priest, Mendoza

Grajales, ran out to learn the tidings he bore. The soldier threw his

arms around him, crying: “Victory! Victory! the French fort is ours!”

He was soon recounting to his countrymen the story of the storming of

Caroline. Toward nightfall the _adelantado_ himself, with his little

party, was seen approaching. Mendoza in surplice, bearing a crucifix,

went forth to meet him. Menendez knelt to kiss the cross, and his

men imitated his example; then they entered the fort in procession,

chanting the Te Deum.[889]

Menendez despatched some light boats with supplies to San Mateo; but

the fort there took fire a few days after its capture, and was almost

entirely destroyed, with much of the booty. He sent other light craft

to Santo Domingo with prisoners, and others still to patrol the coast

and seek any signs of the galleon “San Pelayo,” or of the French. Then

he turned his whole attention to work on his fort and town, so as to

be in readiness to withstand any attack from Ribault if the French

commander should return and prove to be in a condition to assail him

while his forces were divided. He also cultivated friendly intercourse

with the neighboring chiefs whom he found hostile to the French and

their allies.

On the 28th, some of the Indians came to report by signs that the

French were six leagues distant, that they had lost their ships, and

that they had reached the shore by swimming. They had halted at a

stream which they could not cross,—evidently Matanzas inlet. Menendez

sent out a boat, and followed in another with some of his officers and

Mendoza, one of the clergymen. He overtook his party, and they encamped

near the inlet, but out of sight. On the opposite side, the light of

the camp-fires marked the spot occupied by the French. The next day,

seeing Menendez, a sailor swam over, and stated that he had been sent

to say that they were survivors of some of Ribault’s vessels which had

been wrecked; that many of their people had been drowned, others killed

or captured by the Indians; and that the rest, to the number of one

hundred and forty, asked permission and aid to reach their fort, some

distance up the coast.

[Illustration: FLORIDA, 1591 (_Lemoyne, in De Bry_).

[This is the only cartographical result of the French occupation. It

is also reproduced in Gaffarel’s _Floride Française_, and in Shipp’s

_De Soto and Florida_. It was literally copied by Hondius in 1607, and

not so well in the Mercator-Hondius _Atlas_ of 1633. Lescarbot followed

it; but in his 1618 edition altered for the worse the course of the St.

John’s River; and so did De Laet. Cf. Kohl, _Maps in Hakluyt_, p. 48,

and Brinton, _Floridian Peninsula_, p. 80, who says (p. 86) that De

Laet was the first to confine the name Florida to the peninsula; but

Thevet seems nearly to do so in the map in his _Cosmographia_, which he

based on Ortelius, a part of which is given in fac-simile in Weise’s

_Discoveries of America_, p. 304; and it seems also to be the case in

the earlier Mercator gores of 1541. The map accompanying Charlevoix’

narrative will be found in his _Nouvelle France_, i. 24, and in Shea’s

translation of it, i. 133.—ED.]]

Menendez told him that he had captured the fort and put all to the

sword. Then, after asking whether they were Catholics or Lutherans, and

receiving the reply, the Spaniard sent the sailor to his companions,

to say that if they did not give up their arms and surrender, he would

put them all to the sword. On this an officer came over to endeavor

to secure better terms, or to be allowed to remain till vessels could

be obtained to take them to France; but Menendez was inexorable. The

officer pleaded that the lives of the French should be spared; but

Menendez, according to Mendoza, replied, “that he would not give them

such a pledge, but that they should bring their arms and their persons,

and that he should do with them according to his will; because if he

spared their lives he wished them to be grateful to him for it, and if

he put them to death they should not complain that he had broken his

word.” Solis de Meras, another clergyman, brother-in-law of Menendez,

and in St. Augustine at the time, in his account states that Menendez

said, “That if they wished to lay down their colors and their arms, and

throw themselves on his mercy, they could do so, that he might do with

them what God should give him the grace to do; or that they could do as

they chose: for other truce or friendship could not be made with him;”

and that he rejected an offer of ransom which they made.

Menendez himself more briefly writes: “I replied that they might

surrender me their arms and put themselves under my pleasure, that

I might do with them what our Lord might ordain; and from this

resolution I do not and will not depart, unless our Lord God inspired

me otherwise.” The words held out hopes that were delusive; but the

French, hemmed in by the sea and by savages, saw no alternative.

They crossed, laid down their arms, and were bound, by order of

Menendez,—ostensibly to conduct them to the fort. Sixteen, chiefly

Breton sailors, who professed to be Catholics, were spared; the rest,

one hundred and eleven in all, were put to death in cold blood,—as

ruthlessly as the French, ten years before, had despatched their

prisoners amid the smoking ruins of Havana, and, like them, in the name

of religion.[890]

Ribault himself, who was advancing by the same fatal route, was

ignorant alike of the fall of Caroline and of the slaughter of the

survivors of the advanced party; he too hoped to reach Laudonnière.

Some days after the cruel treatment of the first band he reached

the inlet, whose name to this day is a monument of the bloody

work,—Matanzas.

The news of the appearance of this second French party reached

Menendez on the 10th of October,—at the same time almost as that of

the destruction of Fort San Mateo and its contents by fire, and while

writing a despatch to the King, unfolding his plan for colonizing and

holding Florida, by means of a series of forts at the Chesapeake, Port

Royal, the Martyrs, and the Bay of Juan Ponce de Leon. He marched

to the inlet with one hundred and fifty men. The French were on the

opposite side, some making a rude raft. Both parties sounded drum and

trumpet, and flung their standards to the breeze, drawing up in line of

battle. Menendez then ordered his men to sit down and breakfast. Upon

this, Ribault raised a white flag, and one of his men was soon swimming

across. He returned with an Indian canoe that lay at the shore, and

took over La Caille, an officer. Approaching Menendez, the French

officer announced that the force was that of John Ribault, viceroy

for the French king, three hundred and fifty men in all, who had been

wrecked on the coast, and was now endeavoring to reach Fort Caroline.

He soon learned how vain was the attempt. The fate of the fort and of

its garrison, and the stark bodies of the preceding party, convinced

him that those whom he represented must prepare to meet a similar fate.

He requested Menendez to send an officer to Ribault to arrange terms

of surrender; but the reply was that the French commander was free to

cross with a few of his men, if he wished a conference.

When this was reported to him, the unfortunate Ribault made an effort

in person to save his men. He was courteously received by Menendez,

but, like his lieutenant, saw that the case was hopeless. According

to Solis de Meras, Ribault offered a ransom of one hundred and fifty

thousand ducats for himself and one part of his men; another part,

embracing many wealthy nobles, preferring to treat separately. Menendez

declined the offer, expressing his regret at being compelled to forego

the money, which he needed. His terms were as enigmatical as before. He

declared, so he himself tells us, “that they must lay down their arms

and colors and put themselves under my pleasure; that I should do with

their persons as I chose, and that there was nothing else to be done or

concluded with me.”

Ribault returned to his camp and held a council with his officers. Some

were inclined to throw themselves on the mercy of Menendez; but the

majority refused to surrender. The next morning Ribault came over with

seventy officers and men, who decided to surrender and trust to the

mercy of the merciless. The rest had turned southward, preferring to

face new perils rather than be butchered.

The French commander gave up the banner of France and that of Coligny,

with the colors of his force, his own fine set of armor, and his seal

of office. As he and his comrades were bound, he intoned one of the

Psalms; and after its concluding words added: “We are of earth, and to

earth we must return; twenty years more or less is all but as a tale

that is told.” Then he bade Menendez do his will. Two young nobles, and

a few men whom Menendez could make useful, he spared; the rest were at

once despatched.[891]

The French who declined to surrender retreated unpursued to Cañaveral,

where they threw up a log fort and began to build a vessel in order to

escape from Florida. Menendez, recalling some of the men who remained

at San Mateo, set out against them with one hundred and fifty men,

three vessels following the shore with one hundred men to support his

force. On the 8th of November apparently, he reached the fort. The

French abandoned it and fled; but on promise that their lives should

be spared, one hundred and fifty surrendered. Menendez kept his word.

He destroyed their fort and vessel; and leaving a detachment of two

hundred under Captain Juan Velez de Medrano to build Fort Santa Lucia

de Cañaveral in a more favorable spot, he sailed to Havana. Finding

some of his vessels there, he cruised in search of corsairs—chiefly

French and English—who were said to be in great force off the coast

of Santo Domingo, and who had actually captured one of his caravels;

he was afraid that young Ribault might have joined them, and that he

would attack the Spanish posts in Florida.[892] But encountering a

vessel, Menendez learned that the King had sent him reinforcements,

which he resolved to await, obtaining supplies from Campechy for his

forts, as the Governor of Havana refused to furnish any.

The Spaniards in the three Florida posts were ill-prepared for even a

Florida winter, and one hundred died for want of proper clothing and

food. Captain San Vicente and other malcontents excited disaffection,

so that mutinies broke out, and the insurgents seized vessels and

deserted. Fort San Mateo was left with only twenty-one persons in it.

In February, 1566, Menendez explored the Tortugas and the adjacent

coast, seeking some trace of the vessel in which his son had been lost.

His search was fruitless; but he established friendly relations with

the cacique Carlos, and rescued several Spanish prisoners from that

cruel chief, who annually sacrificed one of them.

Meanwhile the French fugitives excited the Indians who were friendly

to them to attack the Spanish posts; and it was no longer safe for

the settlers to stir beyond the works at San Mateo and St. Augustine.

Captain Martin de Ochoa, one of the bravest and most faithful officers,

was slain at San Mateo; and Captain Diego de Hevia and several others

were cut off at St. Augustine. Emboldened by success, the Indians

invested the latter fort, and not only sent showers of arrows into it,

but by means of blazing arrows set fire to the palmetto thatching of

the storehouses. The Spaniards in vain endeavored to extinguish the

flames; the building was consumed, with all their munitions, cloth,

linen, and even the colors of the _adelantado_ and the troops. This

encouraged the Indians, who despatched every Spaniard they could reach.

Menendez reached St. Augustine, March 20, to find it on the brink of

ruin. Even his presence and the force at his command could not bring

the mutineers to obedience. He was obliged to allow Captain San Vicente

and many others to embark in a vessel. Of the men whom at great labor

and expense he had brought to Florida, full five hundred deserted.

After their departure he restored order; and, proceeding to San Mateo,

relieved that place. His next step was to enter into friendly relations

with the chief of Guale, and to begin a fort of stockades, earth, and

fascines at Port Royal which he called San Felipe. Here he left one

hundred and ten men under Stephen de las Alas. From this point the

adventurous Captain Pardo, in 1566 and the following year, explored

the country, penetrating to the silver region of the Cherokees, and

visiting towns reached by De Soto from Cofitachiqui to Tascaluza.[893]

Returning to St. Augustine, Menendez transferred the fort to its

present position, to be nearer the ship landing and less exposed to

the Indians. All the posts suffered from want of food; and even for the

soldiers in the King’s pay the _adelantado_ could obtain no rations

from Havana, although he went there in person. He obtained means to

purchase the necessary provisions only by pledging his own personal

effects.

Before his return there came a fleet of seventeen vessels, bearing

fifteen hundred men, with arms, munitions, and supplies, under Sancho

de Arciniega. Relief was immediately sent to San Mateo and to Santa

Elena, where most of the soldiers had mutinied, and had put Stephen

de las Alas in irons, and sailed away. Menendez divided part of his

reinforcements among his three posts, and then with light vessels

ascended the St. John’s. He endeavored to enter into negotiations with

the caciques Otina and Macoya; but those chiefs, fearing that he had

come to demand reparation for the attacks on the Spaniards, fled at his

approach. He ascended the river till he found the stream narrow, and

hostile Indians lining the banks. On his downward voyage Otina, after

making conditions, received the _adelantado_, who came ashore with only

a few attendants. The chief was surrounded by three hundred warriors;

but showed no hostility, and agreed to become friendly to the Spaniards.

On his return Menendez despatched a captain with thirty soldiers and

two Dominican friars to establish a post on Chesapeake Bay; they were

accompanied by Don Luis Velasco, brother of the chief of Axacan, who

had been taken from that country apparently by Villafañe, and who had

been baptized in Mexico. Instead, however, of carrying out his plans,

the party persuaded the captain of the vessel to sail to Spain.

Two Jesuit Fathers also came to found missions among the Indians; but

one of them, Father Martinez, landing on the coast, was killed by the

Indians; and the survivor, Father Rogel, with a lay brother, by the

direction of Menendez began to study the language of the chief Carlos,

in order to found a mission in his tribe. To facilitate this, Menendez

sent Captain Reynoso to establish a post in that part of Florida.[894]

News having arrived that the French were preparing to attack Florida,

and their depredations in the Antilles having increased, Menendez

sailed to Porto Rico, and cruised about for a time, endeavoring to meet

some of the corsairs. But he was unable to come up with any; and after

visiting Carlos and Tequeste, where missions were now established,

he returned to St. Augustine. His efforts, individually and through

his lieutenants, to gain the native chiefs had been to some extent

successful; Saturiba was the only cacique who held aloof. He finally

agreed to meet Menendez at the mouth of the St. John’s; but, as the

Spanish commander soon learned, the cacique had a large force in

ambush, with the object of cutting him and his men off when they

landed. Finding war necessary, Menendez then sent four detachments,

each of seventy men, against Saturiba; but he fled, and the Spaniards

returned after skirmishes with small bands, in which they killed thirty

Indians.

Leaving his posts well defended and supplied, Menendez sailed to Spain;

and landing near Coruña, visited his home at Aviles to see his wife and

family, from whom he had been separated twenty years. He then proceeded

to Valladolid, where, on the 20th of July, he was received with honor

by the King.

During his absence a French attack, such as he had expected, was made

on Florida. Fearing this, he had endeavored to obtain forces and

supplies for his colony; but was detained, fretting and chafing at the

delays and formalities of the _Casa de Contratacion_ in Seville.[895]

An expedition, comprising one small and two large vessels, was fitted

out at Bordeaux by Dominic de Gourgues, with a commission to capture

slaves at Benin. De Gourgues sailed Aug. 22, 1567, and at Cape Blanco

had a skirmish with some negro chiefs, secured the harbor, and sailed

off with a cargo of slaves. With these he ran to the Spanish West

Indies, and disposed of them at Dominica, Porto Rico, and Santo

Domingo, finding Spaniards ready to treat with him. At Puerto de la

Plata, in the last island, he met a ready confederate in Zaballos, who

was accustomed to trade with the French pirates. Zaballos bought slaves

and goods from him, and furnished him a pilot for the Florida coast.

Puerto de la Plata had been a refuge for some of the deserters from

Florida, and could afford definite information. Here probably the idea

of Gourgues’ Florida expedition originated; though, according to the

bombastic French account, it was only off the Island of Cuba that De

Gourgues revealed his design. He reached the mouth of the St. John’s,

where the French narratives place two forts that are utterly unknown

in Spanish documents, and which were probably only batteries to cover

the entrance. Saluted here as Spanish, the French vessels passed on,

and anchored off the mouth of the St. Mary’s,—the Tacatacuru of the

Indians. By means of a Frenchman, a refugee among the Indians, Gourgues

easily induced Saturiba, smarting under the recent Spanish attack, to

join him in a campaign against San Mateo. The first redoubt was quickly

taken; and the French, crossing in boats, their allies swimming,

captured the second, and then moved on Fort San Mateo itself. The

French account makes sixty men issue from each of what it calls forts,

each party to be cut off by the French, and then makes all of each

party of sixty to fall by the hands of the French and Indians, except

fifteen or thereabout kept for an ignominious death.

Gourgues carried off the artillery of the fort and redoubts; but before

he could transport the rest of his booty to the vessels, a train left

by the Spaniards in the fort was accidentally fired by an Indian who

was cooking fish; the magazine blew up, with all in it. Gourgues hanged

the prisoners who fell into his hands at San Mateo, and descending the

river, hanged thirty more at the mouth, setting up an inscription: “Not

as to Spaniards, but as to Traitors, Robbers, and Murderers.” Returning

to his vessels, he hoisted sail on the 3d of May, and early in June

entered the harbor of La Rochelle. His loss, which is not explained, is

said to have been his smallest vessel, five gentlemen and some soldiers

killed.[896]

[Illustration: WYTFLIET, 1597.

[Cf. the “Florida et Apalche” in Acosta, German edition, Cologne, 1598

(also in 1605); that of Hieronymus Chaves, given in Ortelius, 1592; and

later the maps of the French cartographer Sanson, showing the coast

from Texas to Carolina.—ED.]]

When Gourgues made his descent, Menendez was already at sea, having

sailed from San Lucar on the 13th of March, with abundant supplies and

reinforcements, as well as additional missionaries for the Indians,

under Father John Baptist Segura as vice-provincial. After relieving

his posts in Florida and placing a hundred and fifty men at San Mateo,

he proceeded to Cuba, of which he had been appointed governor. To

strengthen his colony, he solicited permission to colonize the Rio

Pánuco; but the authorities in Mexico opposed his project, and it

failed. The Mississippi, then known as the Espiritu Santo, was supposed

to flow from the neighborhood of Santa Elena, and was depended on as

a means of communication.[897] The next year the _adelantado_ sent

a hundred and ninety-three persons to San Felipe, and eighty to St.

Augustine. Father Rogel then began missions among the Indians around

Port Royal; Father Sedeño and Brother Baez began similar labors on

Guale (now Amelia) Island, the latter soon compiling a grammar and

catechism in the language of the Indians. Others attempted to bring the

intractable chief Carlos and his tribe within the Christian fold. Rogel

drew Indians to his mission at Orista; he put up houses and a church,

and endeavored to induce them to cultivate the ground. But their

natural fickleness would not submit to control; they soon abandoned

the place, and the missionary returned to Fort San Felipe. A school

for Indian boys was opened in Havana, and youths from the tribes of

the coast were sent there in the hope of making them the nucleus of

an Indian civilization. In 1570 Menendez, carrying out his project of

occupying Chesapeake Bay, sent Father Segura with several other Jesuits

to establish a mission at Axacan, the country of the Indian known as

Don Luis Velasco, who accompanied missionaries, promising to do all

in his power to secure for them a welcome from his tribe. The vessel

evidently ascended the Potomac and landed the mission party, who then

crossed to the shores of the Rappahannock. They were received with

seeming friendship, and erected a rude chapel; but the Indians soon

showed a hostile spirit, and ultimately massacred all the party except

an Indian boy. When Menendez returned to Florida from Spain in 1572,

he sailed to the Chesapeake, and endeavored to secure Don Luis and his

brother; but they fled. He captured eight Indians known to have taken

part in the murder of the missionaries, and hanged them at the yard-arm

of his vessel.[898]

From this time Menendez gave little personal attention to the affairs

of Florida, being elsewhere engaged by the King; and he died at

Santander, in Spain, Sept. 17, 1574, when about to take command of an

immense fleet which Philip II. was preparing. With his death Florida,

where his nephew Pedro Menendez Marquez[899] had acted as governor,

languished. Indian hostilities increased, San Felipe was invested,

abandoned, and burned, and soon after the Governor himself was

slain.[900] St. Augustine was finally burned by Drake.

CRITICAL ESSAY ON THE SOURCES OF INFORMATION.

OUR account of the voyages of Ponce de Leon is mainly from the

_cédulas_ to him and official correspondence, correcting Herrera,[901]

who is supposed by some to have had the explorer’s diary, now lost.

Oviedo[902] mentions Bimini[903] as forty leagues from Guanahani. The

modern edition[904] of Oviedo is vague and incorrect; and gives Ponce

de Leon two caravels, but has no details. Gomara[905] is no less

vague. Girava records the discovery, but dates it in 1512.[906] As

early as 1519 the statement is found that the Bay of Juan Ponce had

been visited by Alaminos, while accompanying Ponce de Leon,[907]—which

must refer to this expedition of 1513. The “Traza de las costas”

given by Navarrete (and reproduced by Buckingham Smith),[908] with

the Garay patent of 1521, would seem to make Apalache Bay the western

limit of the discoveries of Ponce de Leon, of whose expedition and

of Alaminos’s no report is known. Peter Martyr[909] alludes to it,

but only incidentally, when treating of Diego Velasquez. Barcia, in

his _Ensayo cronológico_,[910] writing specially on Florida, seems to

have had neither of the patents of Ponce de Leon, and no reports; and

he places the discovery in 1512 instead of 1513.[911] Navarrete[912]

simply follows Herrera.

In the unfortunate expedition of Cordova Bernal Diaz was an actor,

and gives us a witness’s testimony;[913] and it is made the subject

of evidence in the suit in 1536 between the Pinzon and Colon

families.[914] The general historians treat it in course.[915]

The main authority for the first voyage of Garay is the royal letters

patent,[916] the documents which are given by Navarrete[917] and in

the _Documentos inéditos_,[918] as well as the accounts given in Peter

Martyr,[919] Gomara,[920] and Herrera.[921]

Of the pioneer expedition which Camargo conducted for Garay to make

settlement of Amichel, and of its encounter with Cortés, we have the

effect which the first tidings of it produced on the mind of the

Conqueror of Mexico in his second letter of Oct. 30, 1520; while in

his third letter he made representations of the wrongs done to the

Indians by Garay’s people, and of his own determination to protect

the chiefs who had submitted to him.[922] For the untoward ending of

Garay’s main expedition, Cortés is still a principal dependence in his

fourth letter;[923] and the official records of his proceedings against

Garay in October, 1523, with a letter of Garay dated November 8, and

evidently addressed to Cortés, are to be found in the _Documentos

inéditos_,[924] while Peter Martyr,[925] Oviedo,[926] and Herrera[927]

are the chief general authorities. Garay’s renewed effort under his

personal leadership is marked out in three several petitions which he

made for authority to colonize the new country.[928]

[Illustration: AYLLON’S EXPLORATIONS.

[This sketch follows Dr. Kohl’s copy of a map in a manuscript atlas

in the British Museum (no. 9,814), without date; but it seems to be a

record of the explorations (1520) of Ayllon, whose name is corrupted

on the map. The map bears near the main inscription the figure of a

Chinaman and an elephant,—tokens of the current belief in the Asiatic

connections of North America. Cf. Brinton’s _Floridian Peninsula_,

p. 82, 99, on the “Traza de costas de Tierra Ferme y de las Tierras

Nuevas,” accompanying the royal grant to Garay in 1521, being the

chart of Cristóbal de Tobia, given in the third volume of Navarrete’s

_Coleccion_, and sketched on another page of the present volume

(_ante_, p. 218) in a section on “The Early Cartography of the Gulf of

Mexico and adjacent Parts,” where some light is thrown on contemporary

knowledge of the Florida coast.—ED.]]

Of the preliminary expedition on the Atlantic coast of Gordillo and

the subsequent attempt of his chief, Ayllon, to settle in Virginia,

there is a fund of testimony in the papers of the suit which Matienzo

instituted against Ayllon, and of which the greater part is still

unprinted; but a few papers, like the complaint of Matienzo and some

testimony taken by Ayllon when about to sail himself, can be found in

the _Documentos inéditos_.[929] As regards the joint explorations of

the vessels of Gordillo and Quexos, the testimony of the latter helps

us, as well as his act of taking possession, which puts the proceeding

in 1521; though some of Ayllon’s witnesses give 1520 as the date.

Both parties unite in calling the river which they reached the San

Juan Bautista, and the _cédula_ to Ayllon places it in thirty-five

degrees. Navarrete in saying they touched at Chicora and Gualdape

confounds the first and third voyages; and was clearly ignorant of the

three distinct expeditions;[930] and Herrera is wrong in calling the

river the Jordan,[931]—named, as he says, after the captain or pilot

of one of the vessels,—since no such person was on either vessel,

and no such name appears in the testimony: the true Jordan was the

Wateree (Guatari).[932] That it was the intention of Ayllon to make the

expedition one of slave-catching, would seem to be abundantly disproved

by his condemnation of the commander’s act.[933]

Ayllon, according to Spanish writers, after reaching the coast in

his own voyage, in 1526, took a northerly course. Herrera[934] says

he attempted to colonize north of Cape Trafalgar (Hatteras); and the

_piloto mayor_ of Florida, Ecija, who at a later day, in 1609, was sent

to find out what the English were doing, says positively that Ayllon

had fixed his settlement at Guandape. Since by his office Ecija must

have had in his possession the early charts of his people, and must

have made the locality a matter of special study, his assertion has far

greater weight than that of any historian writing in Spain merely from

documents.[935] It is also the opinion of Navarrete[936] that Ayllon’s

course must have been north.

Oviedo[937] does not define the region of this settlement more closely

than to say that it was under thirty-three degrees, adding that it is

not laid down on any map. The Oydores of Santo Domingo, in a letter to

the King in 1528,[938] only briefly report the expedition, and refer

for particulars to Father Antonio Montesinos.[939]

The authorities for the voyage of Gomez are set forth in another

volume.[940]

* * * * *

Upon the expedition of Narvaez, and particularly upon the part taken in

it by Cabeza de Vaca, the principal authority is the narrative of the

latter published at Zamora in 1542 as _La relacion que dio Aluar Nuñez

Cabeça de Vaca de lo acaescido en las Indias en la armada donde yua por

gouernador Pãphilo de narbaez_.[941] It was reprinted at Valladolid in

1555, in an edition usually quoted as _La relacion y comentarios[942]

del governador Aluar Nuñez Cabeça de Vaca de lo acaescido en las dos

jornadas que hizo á los Indios_.[943] This edition was reprinted

under the title of _Navfragios de Alvar Nuñez Cabeza de Vaca_, by

Barcia (1749) in his _Historiadores primitivos_,[944] accompanied by

an “exámen apologético de la historia” by Antonio Ardoino, which

is a defence of Cabeza de Vaca against the aspersions of Honorius

Philoponus,[945] who charges Cabeza de Vaca with claiming to have

performed miracles.

[Illustration: AUTOGRAPH OF NARVAEZ (_From Buckingham Smith_).]

The _Relacion_, translated into Italian from the first edition, was

included by Ramusio in his _Collection_[946] in 1556. A French version

was given by Ternaux in 1837.[947] The earliest English rendering,

or rather paraphrase, is that in Purchas;[948] but a more important

version was made by the late Buckingham Smith, and printed (100 copies)

at the expense of Mr. George W. Riggs, of Washington, in 1851, for

private circulation.[949] A second edition was undertaken by Mr. Smith,

embodying the results of investigations in Spain, with a revision

of the translation and considerable additional annotation; but the

completion of the work of carrying it through the press, owing to

Mr. Smith’s death,[950] devolved upon others, who found his mass of

undigested notes not very intelligible. It appeared in an edition of

one hundred copies in 1871.[951] In these successive editions Mr. Smith

gave different theories regarding the route pursued by Cabeza de Vaca

in his nine years journey.[952]

[Illustration: AUTOGRAPH OF CABEZA DE VACA (_From Buckingham Smith_).]

The documents[953] which Mr. Smith adds to this new edition convey

but little information beyond what can be gathered from Cabeza de

Vaca himself. He adds, however, engravings of Father Juan Xuarez and

Brother Juan Palos, after portraits preserved in Mexico of the twelve

Franciscans who were first sent to that country.[954]

Some additional facts respecting this expedition are derived at second

hand from a letter which Cabeza de Vaca and Dorantes wrote after their

arrival in Mexico to the _Andiencia_ of Hispaniola, which is not now

known, but of which the substance is professedly given by Oviedo.[955]

The Bahia de la Cruz of Narvaez’ landing, made identical with Apalache

Bay by Cabot, is likely to have been by him correctly identified, as

the point could be fixed by the pilots who returned with the ships to

Cuba, and would naturally be recorded on the charts.[956] Smith[957]

believed it to be Tampa Bay. The _Relacion_ describes the bay as one

whose head could be seen from the mouth; though its author seems in

another place to make it seven or eight leagues deep.[958] Narvaez and

his party evidently thought they were nearer Panuco, and had no idea

they were so near Havana. Had they been at Tampa Bay, or on a coast

running north and south, they can scarcely be supposed to have been

so egregiously mistaken.[959] If Tampa was his landing place, it is

necessary to consider the bay where he subsequently built his boats as

Apalache Bay.[960] Charlevoix[961] identifies it with Apalache Bay,

and Siguenza y Gongora finds it in Pensacola.[962]

Of the expedition of Soto we have good and on the whole satisfactory

records. The Concession made by the Spanish King of the government of

Cuba and of the conquest of Florida is preserved to us.[963] There are

three contemporary narratives of the progress of the march. The first

and best was printed in 1557 at Evora as the _Relaçam verdadeira dos

trabalhos [=q] ho gouernador dō Fernādo de Souto e certos fidalgos

portugueses passarom no descobrimēto da provincia da Frlorida_. _Agora

nouamente feita per hū fidalgo Deluas._[964] It is usually cited in

English as the “Narrative of the Gentleman of Elvas,” since Hakluyt

first translated it, and reprinted it in 1609 at London as _Virginia

richly valued by the Description of the Mainland of Florida, her

next Neighbor_.[965] It appeared again in 1611 as _The worthye and

famous Historie of the Travailles, Discovery, and Conquest of Terra

Florida_, and was included in the supplement to the 1809 edition

of the Collection of Hakluyt. It was also reprinted from the 1611

edition in 1851 by the Hakluyt Society as _Discovery and Conquest of

Florida_,[966] edited by William B. Rye, and is included in Force’s

_Tracts_ (vol. iv.) and in French’s _Historical Collections of

Louisiana_ (vol. ii. pp. 111-220). It is abridged by Purchas in his

_Pilgrimes_.[967]

[Illustration: YO EL REY.

[The sign-manual of Charles V. to the _Asiento y Capitulacion_ granted

to De Soto, 1537, as given by B. Smith in his _Coleccion_, p.

146.—ED.]]

Another and briefer original Spanish account is the _Relacion del

suceso de its jornada que hizo Hernando de Soto_ of Luys Hernandez de

Biedma, which long remained in manuscript in the Archivo General de

Indias at Seville,[968] and was first published in a French version

by Ternaux in 1841;[969] and from this William B. Rye translated it

for the Hakluyt Society.[970] Finally, the original Spanish text,

“Relación de la Isla de la Florida,” was published by Buckingham Smith

in 1857 in his _Coleccion de varios documentos para la historia de la

Florida_.[971]

In 1866 Mr. Smith published translations of the narratives of the

Gentleman of Elvas and of Biedma, in the fifth volume (125 copies) of

the Bradford Club Series under the title of _Narratives of the Career

of Hernando de Soto in the Conquest of Florida, as told by a Knight

of Elvas, and in a Relation_ [presented 1544] _by Luys Hernandez de

Biedma_.

[Illustration: AUTOGRAPH OF BIEDMA.

From the _Coleccion_, p. 64, of Buckingham Smith.]

The third of the original accounts is the _Florida del Ynca_ of

Garcilasso de la Vega, published at Lisbon in 1605,[972] which he

wrote forty years after Soto’s death, professedly to do his memory

justice.[973] The spirit of exaggeration which prevails throughout the

volume has deprived it of esteem as an historical authority, though

Theodore Irving[974] and others have accepted it. It is based upon

conversations with a noble Spaniard who had accompanied Soto as a

volunteer, and upon the written but illiterate reports of two common

soldiers,—Alonzo de Carmona, of Priego, and Juan Coles, of Zabra.[975]

Herrera largely embodied it in his _Historia general_.

Still another account of the expedition is the official Report which

Rodrigo Ranjel, the secretary of Soto, based upon his Diary kept on

the march. It was written after reaching Mexico, whence he transmitted

it to the Spanish Government. It remained unpublished in that part of

Oviedo’s _History_ which was preserved in manuscript till Amador de los

Rios issued his edition of Oviedo in 1851. Oviedo seems to have begun

to give the text of Ranjel as he found it; but later in the progress

of the story he abridges it greatly, and two chapters at least are

missing, which must have given the wanderings of Soto from Autiamque,

with his death, and the adventures of the survivors under Mosçoso. The

original text of Ranjel is not known.

These independent narratives of the Gentlemen of Elvas, Biedma,

and Ranjel, as well as those used by Garcilasso de la Vega, agree

remarkably, not only in the main narrative as to course and events, but

also as to the names of the places.

There is also a letter of Soto, dated July 9, 1539, describing his

voyage and landing, which was published by Buckingham Smith in 1854

at Washington,[976] following a transcript (in the Lenox Library) of

a document in the Archives at Simancas, and attested by Muñoz. It is

addressed to the municipality of Santiago de Cuba, and was first made

known in Ternaux’s _Recueil des pièces sur la Floride_. B. F. French

gave the first English version of it in his _Historical Collections of

Louisiana_, part ii. pp. 89-93 (1850).[977]

[Illustration: THE MISSISSIPPI, SIXTEENTH CENTURY.

[This sketch is from a copy in the Kohl Washington Collection, after

a manuscript atlas in the Bodleian. It is without date, but seemingly

of about the middle of the sixteenth century. The “B. de Miruello”

seems to commemorate a pilot of Ponce de Leon’s day. The sketch of the

Atlantic coast made by Chaves in 1536 is preserved to us only in the

description given by Oviedo, of which an English version will be found

in the _Historical Magazine_, x. 371.—ED.]]

The route of De Soto is, of course, a question for a variety of

views.[978] We have in the preceding narrative followed for the

track through Georgia a paper read by Colonel Charles C. Jones, Jr.,

before the Georgia Historical Society, and printed in Savannah in

1880,[979] and for that through Alabama the data given by Pickett in

his _History of Alabama_,[980] whose local knowledge adds weight to his

opinion.[981] As to the point of De Soto’s crossing the Mississippi,

there is a very general agreement on the lowest Chickasaw Bluff.[982]

We are without the means, in any of the original sources, to determine

beyond dispute the most northerly point reached by Soto. He had

evidently approached, but had learned nothing of, the Missouri River.

Almost at the same time that Soto, with the naked, starving remnant

of his army, was at Pacaha, another Spanish force under Vasquez de

Coronado, well handled and perfectly equipped, must in July and August,

1541, have been encamped so near that an Indian runner in a few days

might have carried tidings between them. Coronado actually heard of his

countryman, and sent him a letter; but his messenger failed to find

Soto’s party.[983] But, strangely enough, the cruel, useless expedition

of Soto finds ample space in history, while the well-managed march of

Coronado’s careful exploration finds scant mention.[984] No greater

contrast exists in our history than that between these two campaigns.

* * * * *

A sufficient indication has been given, in the notes of the preceding

narrative, of the sources of information concerning the futile attempts

of the Spaniards at colonization on the Atlantic coast up to the time

of the occupation of Port Royal by Ribault in 1562. Of the consequent

bloody struggle between the Spanish Catholics and the French Huguenots

there are original sources on both sides.

On the Spanish part we have the _Cartas escritas al rey_ of Pedro

Menendez (Sept. 11, Oct. 15, and Dec. 5, 1565), which are preserved

in the Archives at Seville, and have been used by Parkman,[985] and

the _Memoria del buen suceso i buen viage_ of the chaplain of the

expedition, Francisco Lopez de Mendoza Grajales.[986] Barcia’s _Ensayo

cronológico_ is the most comprehensive of the Spanish accounts, and he

gives a large part of the _Memorial de las jornadas_ of Solis de Meras,

a brother-in-law of Menendez. It has never been printed separately;

but Charlevoix used Barcia’s extract, and it is translated from Barcia

in French’s _Historical Collections of Louisiana and Florida_ (vol.

ii. p. 216). Barcia seems also to have had access to the papers of

Menendez,[987] and to have received this Journal of Solis directly from

his family.

On the French side, for the first expedition of Ribault in 1562 we

have the very scarce text of the _Histoire de l’expédition Française

en Floride_, published in London in 1563, which Hakluyt refers to as

being in print “in French and English” when he wrote his _Westerne

Planting_.[988] Sparks[989] could not find that it was ever published

in French; nor was Winter Jones aware of the existence of this 1563

edition when he prepared for the Hakluyt Society an issue of Hakluyt’s

_Divers Voyages_ (1582), in which that collector had included an

English version of it as _The True and Last Discoverie of Florida,

translated into Englishe by one Thomas Hackit_, being the same text

which appeared separately in 1563 as the _Whole and True Discovery of

Terra Florida_.[990]

At Paris in 1586 appeared a volume, dedicated to Sir Walter Raleigh,

entitled, _L’histoire notable de la Floride, ... contenant les trois

voyages faits en icelle par certains capitaines et pilotes François

descrits par le Capitaine Laudonnière, ... à laquelle a esté adjousté

un quatriesme voyage fait par le Capitaine Gourgues, Mise en lumiere

par M. Basanier_. This was a comprehensive account, or rather

compilation, of the four several French expeditions,—1562, 1564, 1565,

1567,—covering the letters of Laudonnière for the first three, and

an anonymous account, perhaps by the editor Basanier, of the fourth.

Hakluyt, who had induced the French publication, gave the whole an

English dress in his _Notable History, translated by R. H._, printed in

London in 1587,[991] and again in his _Principall Navigations_, vol.

iii., the text of which is also to be found in the later edition and in

French’s _Historical Collections of Louisiana and Florida_ (1869), i.

165.[992]

[Illustration: ROUTE OF DE SOTO (_after Delisle_),—WESTERLY PART.

[This map of Delisle, issued originally at Paris, is given in the

Amsterdam (1707) edition of Garcilasso de la Vega’s _Histoire des Incas

et de la conquête de la Floride_, vol. ii; cf. _Voyages au nord_,

vol. v., and Delisle’s _Atlas nouveau_. The map is also reproduced

in French’s _Historical Collections of Louisiana_, and Gravier’s _La

Salle_ (1870). Other maps of the route are given by Rye, McCulloch, and

Irving; by J. C. Brevoort in Smith’s _Narratives of Hernando de Soto_,

and in Paul Chaix’ _Bassin du Mississipi au seizième siècle_.

Besides the references already noted, the question of his route has

been discussed, to a greater or less extent, in Charlevoix’ _Nouvelle

France_; in Warden’s _Chronologie historique de l’Amérique_, where

the views of the geographer Homann are cited; in Albert Gallatin’s

“Synopsis of the Indian Tribes” in the _Archæologia Americana_, vol.

ii.; in Nuttall’s _Travels in Arkansas_ (1819 and 1821); in Williams’s

_Florida_ (New York, 1837); in McCulloch’s _Antiquarian Researches

in America_ (Baltimore, 1829); in Schoolcraft’s _Indian Tribes_,

vol. iii.; in Paul Chaix’ _Bassin du Mississipi au seizième siècle_;

in J. W. Monette’s _Valley of the Mississippi_ (1846); in Pickett’s

_Alabama_; in Gayarré’s _Louisiana_; in Martin’s _Louisiana_; in

_Historical Magazine_, v. 8; in _Knickerbocker Magazine_, lxiii. 457;

in _Sharpe’s Magazine_, xlii. 265; and in Lambert A. Wilmer’s _Life

of De Soto_ (1858). Although Dr. Belknap in his _American Biography_

(1794, vol. i. p. 189), had sought to establish a few points of De

Soto’s march, the earliest attempt to track his steps closely was

made by Alexander Meek, in a paper published at Tuscaloosa in 1839 in

_The Southron_, and reprinted as “The Pilgrimage of De Soto,” in his

_Romantic Passages in Southwestern History_ (Mobile, 1857), p. 213.

Irving, in the revised edition of his _Conquest of Florida_, depended

largely upon the assistance of Fairbanks and Smith, and agrees mainly

with Meek and Pickett. In his appendix he epitomizes the indications

of the route according to Garcilasso and the Portuguese gentleman.

Rye collates the statements of McCulloch and Monette regarding the

route beyond the Mississippi, and infers that the identifying of the

localities is almost impossible. Chaix (_Bassin du Mississipi_) also

traces this part.—ED.]]

[Illustration: ROUTE OF DE SOTO (_after Delisle_),—EASTERLY PART.]

Jacques Lemoyne de Morgues, an artist accompanying Laudonnière, wrote

some years later an account, and made maps and drawings, with notes

describing them. De Bry made a visit to London in 1587 to see Lemoyne,

who was then in Raleigh’s service; but Lemoyne resisted all persuasions

to part with his papers.[993] After Lemoyne’s death De Bry bought them

off his widow (1588), and published them in 1591, in the second part

of his _Grands voyages_, as _Brevis narratio_.[994]

One Nicolas le Challeux, or Challus, a carpenter, a man of sixty, who

was an eye-witness of the events at Fort Caroline, and who for the

experiences of Ribault’s party took the statements of Dieppe sailors

and of Christopher le Breton, published a simple narrative at Dieppe

in 1566 under the title of _Discours de l’histoire de la Floride_,

which was issued twice,—once with fifty-four, and a second time

with sixty-two, pages,[995] and the same year reprinted, with some

variations, at Lyons as _Histoire mémorable du dernier voyage fait par

le Capitaine Iean Ribaut en l’an MDLXV_ (pp. 56).[996]

It is thought that Thevet in his _Cosmographie universelle_ (1575) may

have had access to Laudonnière’s papers; and some details from Thevet

are embodied in what is mainly a translation of Le Challeux, the _De

Gallorum expeditione in Floridam anno MDLXV brevis historia_, which was

added (p. 427) by Urbain Chauveton, or Calveton, to the Latin edition

of Benzoni,—_Novæ novi orbis historiæ tres libri_, printed at Geneva in

1578 and 1581,[997] and reproduced under different titles in the French

versions, published likewise at Geneva in 1579, 1588, and 1589.[998]

There is a separate issue of it from the 1579 edition.[999]

It was not long before exaggerated statements were circulated, based

upon the representations made in _Une requête au roi_ (Charles IX.) of

the widows and orphans of the victims of Menendez, in which the number

of the slain is reported at the impossible figure of nine hundred.[1000]

Respecting the expedition of De Gourgues there are no Spanish

accounts whatever, Barcia[1001] merely taking in the main the French

narrative,—in which, says Parkman, “it must be admitted there is a

savor of romance.”[1002] That Gourgues was merely a slaver is evident

from this full French account. Garibay notes his attempt to capture at

least one Spanish vessel; and he certainly had on reaching Florida two

barks, which he must have captured on his way. Basanier and many who

follow him suppress entirely the slaver episode in this voyage. All the

De Gourgues narratives ignore entirely the existence of St. Augustine,

and make the three pretended forts on the St. John to have been of

stone; and Prévost, to heighten the picture, invents the story of the

flaying of Ribault, of which there is no trace in the earlier French

accounts.

There are two French narratives. One of them, _La reprinse de la

Floride_, exists, according to Gaffarel,[1003] in five different

manuscript texts.[1004] The other French narrative is the last paper

in the compilation of Basanier, already mentioned. Brinton[1005] is

inclined to believe that it is not an epitome of the _Reprinse_, but

that it was written by Basanier himself from the floating accounts of

his day, or from some unknown relater. Charlevoix mentions a manuscript

in the possession of the De Gourgues family; but it is not clear which

of these papers it was.

The story of the Huguenot colony passed naturally into the historical

records of the seventeenth century;[1006] but it got more special

treatment in the next century, when Charlevoix issued his _Nouvelle

France_.[1007] The most considerable treatments of the present century

have been by Jared Sparks in his _Life of Ribault_,[1008] by Francis

Parkman in his _Pioneers of France in the New World_,[1009] and by Paul

Gaffarel in his _Histoire de la Floride Française_.[1010] The story has

also necessarily passed into local and general histories of this period

in America, and into the accounts of the Huguenots as a sect.[1011]

[Illustration]

Narrative and Critical History of America, Vol. 2 (of 8) Spanish Explorations and Settlements in America from the Fifteenth to the Seventeenth Century · 第 7 / 20 章