ON THE VIOLA OF THE ROMANS.

I contributed the following note on "The Viola of the Romans," to the

_Gardeners' Chronicle_ of September 26, 1874, as I found a correspondent

had been adopting Lord Stanhope's views.

* * * * *

Mr. Ruskin in his _Queen of the Air_ wrote, "I suspect that the flower

whose name we translate 'Violet' was in truth an Iris" (he is speaking

of the Greek _ion_, but the Viola no doubt is whatever the _ion_ was).

In Lord Stanhope's _Miscellanies_, second series, which was published in

1872, a paper, which had been previously (in 1830) read before the

Society of Antiquaries, treats of the "Viola of the Ancients."

Lord Stanhope identifies it with the Iris, and on the following

grounds:--

1. Because when riding through Sicily in the winter of 1825, he saw many

Irises and no Violets, and heard that the country people called the Iris

Viola.

2. Because Pliny speaks of Violae luteae, whereas there are no Violets of

that colour.

3. Because Pliny also describes the Violet as growing in sunny and

barren places ("apricis et macris locis"), whereas really Violets always

grow in the shade.

4. Because he speaks of the Violet as springing from a fleshy root-stock

("ab radice carnoso"), whereas the Violet root is fibrous.

5. Because Ovid couples the Violet with the Poppy and the Lily as

flowers which, when broken off, hang their heads to the ground.

I need not say much as to Lord Stanhope's not finding Violets in Sicily

in winter, for the question is, whether he would not find them in Italy

in spring. Nor does the fact of the Sicilian peasants speaking of the

Iris as a Violet disturb me any more than when I hear a Scotch peasant

speak of the "Harebell" as a "Bluebell."

The real authority is Pliny, and Pliny settles the question completely.

He says (I quote for convenience from Bohn's translated edition):--"Next

after the Roses and the Lilies, the Violet is held in the highest

esteem. Of this there are several varieties, the purple, the yellow, and

the white, all of them reproduced from plants, like the Cabbage. The

Purple Violet, which springs up spontaneously in sunny spots with a thin

meagre soil, has larger petals than the others, springing immediately

from the root, which is of a fleshy substance. This Violet has a name,

too, distinct from the other wild kinds, being called 'ion,' and from it

the ianthine cloth takes its name."

He goes on to say that of cultivated kinds the Yellow Violet is held in

most esteem. He speaks then of the Tusculan and Marine Violet as having

broader petals than the others, but being less sweet, while the

Calathian Violet is also without scent.

A little farther on he describes the Iris itself, and says "the stem of

this plant is a cubit in length and erect, the flower being of various

colours like the rainbow, to which circumstance it is indebted for its

name." It is, he adds, a plant of a caustic nature, and the root is used

in perfumery and medicine, but the flower is _never employed for

garlands_.

After this, perhaps, it is needless to add that of course Lord Stanhope

is mistaken in supposing that there are no Yellow Violets (he may find

any number half-way up the Rigi), or that Violets do not often grow in

sunny and sterile places, or that the Purple Violet has not a fleshy

root-stock.

That the Sweet Violet, which Pliny says was used for wreath-making, was

generally cultivated is certain from Horace's

"Tum _violaria_ et

Myrtus, et omnis copia narium

Spargent olivetis odorem."

_Odes_, ii. 15.

Then, again, the Sweet Violet was used for the flavouring of wine--the

"vinum violatum."

There are other passages in which Pliny speaks of the sweetness of the

Violet. He says it is sweetest at a distance, and that it has no scent

except in the flower itself.

There can be no doubt then whatever (I conceive) that the Greeks, when

they spoke of the "ion," or the Romans of the "Viola," generally meant

our Violet, and that the Violet-wreaths were made from this familiar

flower.

Still the name was perhaps loosely used, and it is highly probable that

the flower to which Ovid refers, in the passage which Lord Stanhope

quotes, was the Snowflake or Leucoion (literally, "White Violet").

A Year in a Lancashire Garden Second Edition · 第 23 / 34 题