MUSIC AS A MEANS OF CULTURE

From the Atlantic Monthly, 1870, by permission of Houghton, Mifflin

and Company

We as a democratic people, a great mixed people of all races,

overrunning a vast continent, need music even more than others. We

need some ever-present, ever-welcome influence that shall insensibly

tone down our self-asserting and aggressive manners, round off the

sharp, offensive angularity of character, subdue and harmonize the

free and ceaseless conflict of opinions, warm out the genial

individual humanity of each and every unit of society, lest he become

a mere member of a party, or a sharer of business or fashion. This

rampant liberty will rush to its own ruin, unless there shall be found

some gentler, harmonizing, humanizing culture, such as may pervade

whole masses with a fine enthusiasm, a sweet sense of reverence for

something far above us, beautiful and pure; awakening some ideality in

every soul, and often lifting us out of the hard hopeless prose of

daily life. We need this beautiful corrective of our crudities. Our

radicalism will pull itself up by the roots, if it do not cultivate

the instinct of reverence. The first impulse of freedom is

centrifugal,--to fly off the handle,--unless it be restrained by a no

less free impassioned love of order. We need to be so enamored of the

divine idea of unity, that that alone--the enriching of that--shall be

the real motive for assertion of our individuality. What shall so

temper and tone down our "fierce democracy"? It must be something

better, lovelier, more congenial to human nature than mere stern

prohibition, cold Puritanic "Thou shalt _not_!" What can so quickly

magnetize a people into this harmonic mood as music? Have we not seen

it, felt it?

The hard-working, jaded millions need expansion, need the

rejuvenating, the ennobling experience of joy. Their toil, their

church, their creed perhaps, their party livery, and very vote, are

narrowing; they need to taste, to breathe a larger, freer life. Has it

not come to thousands, while they have listened to or joined their

voices in some thrilling chorus that made the heavens seem to open and

come down? The governments of the Old World do much to make the people

cheerful and contented; here it is all _laissez-faire_, each for

himself, in an ever keener strife of competition. We must look very

much to music to do this good work for us; we are open to that

appeal; we can forget ourselves in that; we blend in joyous fellowship

when we can sing together; perhaps quite as much so when we can listen

together to a noble orchestra of instruments interpreting the highest

inspirations of a master. The higher and purer the character and kind

of music, the more of real genius there is in it, the deeper will this

influence be.

Judge of what can be done, by what already, within our own experience,

has been done and daily is done. Think what the children in our

schools are getting, through the little that they learn of vocal

music,--elasticity of spirit, joy in harmonious co-operation, in the

blending of each happy life in others; a rhythmical instinct of order

and of measure in all movement; a quickening of ear and sense, whereby

they will grow up susceptible to music, as well as with some use of

their own voices, so that they may take part in it; for from these

spacious nurseries (loveliest flower gardens, apple orchards in full

bloom, say, on their annual _fete_ days) shall our future choirs and

oratorio choruses be replenished with good sound material....

We esteem ourselves the freest people on this planet; yet perhaps we

have as little real freedom as any other, for we are the slaves of our

own feverish enterprise, and of a barren theory of discipline, which

would fain make us virtuous to a fault through abstinence from very

life. We are afraid to give ourselves up to the free and happy

instincts of our nature. All that is not pursuit of advancement in

some good, conventional, approved way of business, or politics, or

fashion, or intellectual reputation, or professed religion, we count

waste. We lack _geniality_; nor do we as a people understand the

meaning of the word. We ought to learn it practically of our Germans.

It comes of the same root with the word _genius_. Genius is the

spontaneous principle; it is free and happy in its work; it is artist

and not drudge; its whole activity is reconciliation of the heartiest

pleasure with the purest loyalty to conscience, with the most holy,

universal, and disinterested ends. Genius, as Beethoven gloriously

illustrates in his Choral Symphony (indeed, in all his symphonies),

finds the keynote and solution of the problem of the highest state in

"Joy," taking his text from Schiller's Hymn. Now, all may not be

geniuses in the sense that we call Shakespeare, Mozart, Raphael, men

of genius. But all should be partakers of this spontaneous, free, and

happy method of genius; all should live childlike, genial lives, and

not wear all the time the consequential livery of their unrelaxing

business, nor the badge of party and profession, in every line and

feature of their faces. This genial, childlike faculty of social

enjoyment, this happy art of life, is just what our countrymen may

learn from the social "Liedertafel" and the summer singing-festivals

of which the Germans are so fond. There is no element of national

character which we so much need; and there is no class of citizens

whom we should be more glad to adopt and own than those who set us

such examples. So far as it is a matter of culture, it is through art

chiefly that the desiderated genial era must be ushered in. The

Germans have the sentiment of art, the feeling of the beautiful in

art, and consequently in nature, more developed than we have. Above

all, music offers itself as the most available, most popular, most

influential of the fine arts,--music, which is the art and language of

the feelings, the sentiments, the spiritual instincts of the soul; and

so becomes a universal language, tending to unite and blend and

harmonize all who may come within its sphere.

Such civilizing, educating power has music for society at large. Now,

in the finer sense of culture, such as we look for in more private and

select "society," as it is called, music in the salon, in the small

chamber concert, where congenial spirits are assembled in its

name--good music of course--does it not create a finer sphere of

social sympathy and courtesy? Does it not better mold the tone and

manners from within than any imitative "fashion" from without? What

society, upon the whole, is quite so sweet, so satisfactory, so

refined, as the best musical society, if only Mozart, Mendelssohn,

Franz, Chopin, set the tone! The finer the kind of music heard or made

together, the better the society. This bond of union only reaches the

few; coarser, meaner, more prosaic natures are not drawn to it. Wealth

and fashion may not dictate who shall be of it. Here congenial spirits

meet in a way at once free, happy, and instructive, meet with an

object which insures "society"; whereas so-called society, as such, is

often aimless, vague, modifying and fatiguing, for the want of any

subject-matter. Here one gets ideas of beauty which are not mere

arbitrary fashions, ugly often to the eye of taste. Here you may

escape vulgarity by a way not vulgar in itself, like that of fashion,

which makes wealth and family and means of dress its passports. Here

you can be as exclusive as you please, by the soul's light, not

wronging any one; here learn gentle manners, and the quiet ease and

courtesy with which cultivated people move, without in the same

process learning insincerity.

Of course the same remarks apply to similar sincere reunions in the

name of any other art, or of poetry. But music is the most social of

them all, even if each listener find nothing set down to his part (or

even hers!) but _tacet_.

We have fancied ourselves entertaining a musical house together, but

we must leave it with no time to make report or picture out the scene.

Now, could we only enter the chamber, the inner sanctum, the private

inner life of a thoroughly musical person, one who is wont to _live_

in music! Could we know him in his solitude! (You can only know him in

yourself, unless he be a poet and creator in his art, and bequeath

himself in that form in his works for any who know how to read.) If

the best of all society is musical society, we go further and say: The

sweetest of all solitude is when one is alone with music. One gets the

best of music, the sincerest part, when he is alone. Our

poet-philosopher has told us to secure solitude at any cost; there's

nothing which we can so ill afford to do without. It is a great vice

of our society, that it provides for and disposes to so little

solitude, ignoring the fact that there is more loneliness in company

than out of it. Now, to a musical person, in the mood of it, in the

sweet hours by himself, comes music as the nearest friend, nearer and

dearer than ever before; and he soon finds that he never was in such

good company. I doubt if symphony of Beethoven, opera of Mozart,

Passion Music of Bach, was ever so enjoyed or felt in grandest public

rendering, as one may feel it while he recalls its outline by himself

at his piano (even if he be a slow and bungling reader and may get it

out by piecemeal). I doubt if such an one can carry home from the

performance, in presence of the applauding crowd, nearly so much as he

may take to it from such inward, private preparation.

Are you alone? What spirits can you summon up to fill the vacancy, and

people it with life and love and beauty! Take down the volume of

sonatas, the arrangement of the great Symphony, the recorded reveries

of Chopin, the songs of Schubert, Schumann, Franz, or even the

chorals, with the harmony of Bach, in which the four parts blend their

several individual melodies together in such loving service of the

whole, that the plain people's tune becomes a germ unfolding into

endless wealth and beauty of meaning; and you have the very essence

of all prayer, and praise, and gratitude, as if you were a worshiper

in the ideal church. Nothing like music, then, to banish the benumbing

ghost of ennui. It lends secret sympathy, relief, expression, to all

one's moods, loves, longings, sorrows; comes nearer to the soul or to

the secret wound than any friend or healing sunshine from without. It

nourishes and feeds the hidden springs of hope and love and faith;

renews the old conviction of life's springtime,--that the world is

ruled by love, that God is good, that beauty is a divine end of life,

and not a snare and an illusion. It floods out of sight the unsightly,

muddy grounds of life's petty, anxious, doubting moments, and makes

immortality a present fact, lived in and realized. It locks the door

against the outer world of discords, contradictions, importunities,

beneath the notice of a soul so richly occupied: lets "Fate knock at

the door" (as Beethoven said in explanation of his symphony),--Fate

and the pursuing Furies,--and even welcomes them, and turns them into

gracious goddesses,--Eumenides! Music, in this way, is a marvelous

elixir to keep off old age. Youth returns in solitary hours with

Beethoven and Mozart. Touching the chords of the 'Moonlight Sonata,'

the old man is once more a lover; with the _andante_ of the 'Pastoral

Symphony' he loiters by the shady brookside, hand in hand with his

fresh heart's first angel. You are past the sentimental age, yet you

can weep alone in music,--not weep exactly, but find outlet more

expressive and more worthy of your manly faith.

A great grief comes, an inconsolable bereavement, a humiliating,

paralyzing reverse, a blow of Fate, giving the lie to your best plans

and bringing your best powers into discredit with yourself; then you

are best prepared and best entitled to receive the secret visitations

of these tuneful goddesses and muses.

"Who never ate his bread in tears,

He knows you not, ye heavenly powers!"

So sings the German poet. It is the want of inward, deep experience,

it is innocence of sorrow and of trial, more than the lack of any

special cultivation of musical taste and knowledge, that debars many

people--naturally most young people, and all who are what we call

shallow natures--from the feeling and enjoyment of many of the truest,

deepest, and most heavenly of all the works of music. Take the Passion

Music of Bach, for instance; if you can sit down alone at your piano

and decipher strains and pieces of it when you _need_ such music, you

shall find that in its quiet quaintness, its sincerity and tenderness,

its abstinence from all striving for effect, it speaks to you and

entwines itself about your heart, like the sweetest, deepest verses in

the Bible; when "the soul muses till the fire burns."

Such a panacea is this art for loneliness. But sometimes too it may

intensify the sense of loneliness, only for more heavenly relief at

last. Think of the deep composer, of lonely, sad Beethoven, wreaking

his pain upon expression in those impatient chords and modulations,

putting his sorrows into sonatas, and wringing triumph always out of

all! Look at him as he was then,--morose, they say, and lonely and

tormented; look where he is now, as the whole world knows him, feels

him, seeks him for its joy and inspiration--and who can doubt of

immortality?

Now, in such private solace, in such solitary joys, is there not

culture? Can one rise from such communings with the good spirits of

the tone-world and go out, without new peace, new faith, new hope, and

good-will in his soul? He goes forth in the spirit of reconciliation

and of patience, however much he may hate the wrong he sees about him,

or however little he accept authorities and creeds that make war on

his freedom. The man who has tasted such life, and courted it till he

has become acclimated in it, whether he be of this party or that, or

none at all; whether he be believer or "heretic," conservative or

radical, follower of Christ by name or "Free Religionist,"--belongs to

the harmonic and anointed body-guard of peace, fraternity, good-will;

his instincts have all caught the rhythm of that holy march; the good

genius leads, he has but to follow cheerfully and humbly. For somehow

the minutest fibres, the infinitesimal atoms of his being, have got

magnetized as it were into a loyal, positive direction towards the

pole-star of unity; he has grown attuned to a believing, loving mood,

just as the body of a violin, the walls of a music hall, by much

music-making become gradually seasoned into smooth vibration.

[Illustration: GEORG EBERS.]

Library of the World's Best Literature, Ancient and Modern — Volume 13 · 第 18 / 222 题