measure of the gift of Christ. Wherefore He saith: 'When He ascended
on high, He led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.' Now
this, 'He ascended,' what is it but that He also descended into the
lower parts of the earth? He that descended is the same also that
ascended far above all the heavens, that He might fill all things.
And He gave some _to be_ apostles; and some, prophets; and some
evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; for the perfecting of
the saints for work of ministration, for the building up of the body
of Christ."--EPH. iv. 7-12.
In verse 7 the apostle passes from the unities of the Church to its
diversities, from the common foundation of the Christian life to the
variety presented in its superstructure. "To each single one of us was
the grace given." The great gift of God in Christ is manifold in its
distribution. Its manifestations are as various and fresh as the
idiosyncrasies of human personality. There is no capacity of our nature,
no element of human society which the gospel of Christ cannot sanctify
and turn to good account.
All this the apostle keeps in view and allows for in his doctrine of the
Church. He does not merge man in humanity, nor sacrifice the individual
to the community. He claims for each believer direct fellowship with
Christ and access to God. The earnestness with which in his earlier
epistles St Paul insisted on the responsibilities of conscience and on
the personal experience of salvation, leads him now to press the claims
of the Church with equal vigour. He understands well that the person has
no existence apart from the community, that our moral nature is
essentially social and the religious life essentially fraternal. Its
vital element is "the _communion_ of the Holy Spirit." Hence, to gather
the real drift of this passage we must combine the first words of verse
7 with the last of verse 12: "To each single one of us was the grace
given--in order to build up the body of Christ." God's grace is not
bestowed upon us to diffuse and lose itself in our separate
individualities; but that it may minister to one life and work towards
one end and build up one great body in us all. The diversity subserves a
higher unity. Through ten thousand channels, in ten thousand varied
forms of personal influence and action, the stream of the grace of God
flows on to the accomplishment of the eternal purpose.
Like a wise master in his household and sovereign in his kingdom, the
Lord of the Church distributes His manifold gifts. His bestowments and
appointments are made with an eye to the furtherance of the state and
house that He has in charge. As God dispenses His wisdom, so Christ His
gifts "according to plan" (iii. 11). The purpose of the ages, God's
great plan for mankind, determines "the measure of the gift of Christ."
Now, it is to illustrate this _measure_, to set forth the style and
scale of Christ's bestowments within His Church, that the apostle brings
in evidence the words of Psalm lxviii. 18. He interprets this ancient
verse as he cites it, and weaves it into the texture of his argument.
In the original it reads thus:
"Thou hast ascended on high, Thou hast led Thy captivity captive,
Thou hast received gifts among men,--
Yea, among the rebellious also, that the LORD God might dwell with
them." (R.V.)
Let us go back for a moment to the occasion of the old Hebrew song.
Psalm lxviii, is, as Ewald says, "the greatest, most splendid and
artistic of the temple-songs of Restored Jerusalem." It celebrates
Jehovah's entry into Zion. This culminating verse records, as the
crowning event of Israel's history, the capture of Zion from the rebel
Jebusites and the Lord's ascension in the person of His chosen to take
His seat upon this holy hill. The previous verses, in which fragments of
earlier songs are embedded, describe the course of the Divine Leader of
Israel through former ages. In the beat and rhythm of the Hebrew lines
one hears the footfall of the Conqueror's march, as He "arises and His
enemies are scattered" and "kings of armies flee apace," while nature
trembles at His step and bends her wild powers to serve His
congregation. The sojourn in the wilderness, the scenes of Sinai, the
occupancy of Canaan, the wars of the Judges were so many stages in the
progress of Jehovah, which had Zion always for its goal. To Zion, the
new and more glorious sanctuary, Sinai must now give place. Bashan and
all mountains towering in their pride in vain "look askance at the hill
which God has desired for His abode," where "Jehovah will dwell for
ever." So the day of the Lord's desire has come! From the Kidron valley
David leads Jehovah's triumph up the steep slopes of Mount Zion. A train
of captives defiles before the Lord's anointed, who sits down on the
throne that God gives him and receives in His name the submission of the
heathen. The vanquished chiefs cast their spoil at his feet; it is laid
up in treasure to build the future temple; while, upon this happy day of
peace, "the rebellious also" share in Jehovah's grace and become His
subjects.
In this conquest David "gave to men" rather than "received"--gave even
to his stubborn enemies (witness his subsequent transaction with Araunah
the Jebusite for the site of the temple); for that which he took from
them served to build amongst them God's habitation: "that," as the
Psalmist sings, "the Lord God might dwell with them." St Paul's
adaptation of the verse is both bold and true. If he departs from the
letter, he unfolds the spirit of the prophetic words. That David's
_giving_ signified a higher _receiving_, Jewish interpreters themselves
seem to have felt, for this paraphrase was current also amongst them.
The author of this Hebrew song has in no way exaggerated the importance
of David's victory. The summits of the elect nation's history shine with
a supernatural and prophetic light. The spirit of the Christ in the
unknown singer "testified beforehand of the glory that should follow"
His warfare and sufferings. From this victorious height, so hardly won,
the Psalmist's verse flashes the light of promise across the space of a
thousand years; and St. Paul has caught the light, and sends it on to us
shining with a new and more spiritual brightness. David's "going up on
high" was, to the apostle's mind, a picture of the ascent of Christ, his
Son and Lord. David rose from deep humiliation to a high dominion; his
exaltation brought blessing and enrichment to his people; and the spoil
that he won with it went to build God's house amongst rebellious men.
All this was true in parable of the dispensation of grace to mankind
through Jesus Christ; and His ascension disclosed the deeper import of
the words of the ancient Scripture. "Wherefore God saith" (and St Paul
takes the liberty of putting in his own words _what_ He
saith)--"wherefore He saith: He ascended on high; He led captivity
captive; He gave gifts to men."
* * * * *
The three short clauses of the citation supply, in effect, a threefold
measure of the gifts of Christ to His Church. They are gifts _of the
ascended Saviour_. They are gifts bestowed _from the fruit of His
victory_. And they are gifts _to men_. Measure them, first, by the
height to which He has risen--from what a depth! Measure them, again, by
the spoils He has already won. Measure them, once more, by the wants of
mankind, by the need He has undertaken to supply.--As He is, so He
gives; as He has, so He gives; as He has given, so He will give till we
are filled unto all the fulness of God.
I. Think first, then, of Him. Think of what, and _where_ He is! Consider
"what is the height" of His exaltation; and then say, if you can, "what
is the breadth" of His munificence.
We know well how He gave as a poor and suffering man upon earth--gave,
with what affluence, pity and delight, bread to the hungry thousands,
wine to the wedding-feast, health to the sick, sight to the blind,
pardon to the sinful, sometimes life to the dead! Has His elevation
altered Him? Too often it is so with vain and weak men like ourselves.
Their wealth increases, but their hearts contract. The more they have to
give, the less they love to give. They go up on high as men count it,
and climb to places of power and eminence; and they forget the friends
of youth and the ranks from which they sprang--low-minded men. Not so
with our exalted Friend. "It is not one that went down, and another that
went up," says Theodoret. "He that descended, _it is He_ also that
ascended up far above all the heavens!" (ver. 10). Jesus of Nazareth is
on the throne of God,--"the same yesterday and to-day!" But now the
resources of the universe are at His disposal. Out of that treasure He
can choose the best gifts for you and me.
Mere authority, even Omnipotence, could not suffice to save and bless
moral beings like ourselves; nor even the best will joined to
Omnipotence. Christ gained by His humiliation, in some sense, a new
fulness added to the fulness of the Godhead. This gain of His sufferings
is implied in what the apostle writes in Colossians i. 19 concerning the
risen and exalted Redeemer: "It was well-pleasing that _all_ the fulness
should make its dwelling in Him." His plenitude is that of the Ascended
One _who had descended_. "If He ascended, what does it mean but that He
also descended into the under regions of the earth?" (ver. 9). If He
went up, why then He had been down!--down to the Virgin's womb and the
manger cradle, wrapping His Godhead within the frame and the brain of a
little child; down to the home and the bench of the village carpenter;
down to the contradiction of sinners and the level of their scorn; down
to the death of the cross,--to the nether abyss, to that dim populous
underworld into which we look shuddering over the grave's edge! And from
that lower gulf He mounted up again to the solid earth and the light of
day and the world of breathing men; and up, and up again, through the
rent clouds and the ranks of shouting angels, and under the lifted heads
of the everlasting doors, until He took His seat at the right hand of
the Majesty in the heavens.
Think of the regions He has traversed, the range of being through which
the Lord Jesus passed in descending and ascending, "that He might fill
all things." Heaven, earth, hades--hades, earth, heaven again are His;
not in mere sovereignty of power, but in experience and communion of
life. Each He has annexed to His dominion by inhabitation and the right
of self-devoting love, as from sphere to sphere He "travelled in the
greatness of His power, mighty to save." He is Lord of angels; but still
more of men,--Lord of the living, and of the dead. To them that sleep in
the dust He has proclaimed His accomplished sacrifice and the right of
universal judgement given Him by the Father.
Nor did Abraham alone and Moses and Elijah have the joy of "seeing His
day," but all the holy men of old, who had embraced its promise and
"died in faith," who looked forward through their imperfect sacrifices
"which could never quite take away sins" to the better thing which God
provided for us, and for their perfection along with us.[99] On the two
side-posts of the gate of death our great High Priest sprinkled His
atoning blood. He turned the abode of corruption into a sweet and quiet
sleeping chamber for His saints. Then at His touch those cruel doors
swung back upon their hinges, and He issued forth the Prince of life,
with the keys of death and hades hanging from His girdle. From the
depths of the grave to the heaven of heavens His Mastership extends.
With the perfume of His presence and the rich incense of His sacrifice
Jesus Christ has "filled all things." The universe is made for us one
realm of redeeming grace, the kingdom of the Son of God's love.
"So there crowns Him the topmost, ineffablest, uttermost crown;
And His love fills infinitude wholly, nor leaves up nor down
One spot for the creature to stand in!"[100]
So "Christ is all things, and in all." And we are nothing; but we have
everything in Him.
How, pray, will He give who has thus given Himself,--who has thus
endured and achieved on our behalf? Let our hearts consider; let our
faith and our need be bold to ask. One promise from His lips is enough:
"If ye shall ask anything in my name, I will do it."
II. A second estimate of the gifts to be looked for from Christ, we
derive from _His conquests already won_. David as he entered Zion's
gates "led captivity captive,"--led, that is in Hebrew phrase, a great,
a notable captivity. Out of the gifts thus received he enriched his
people. The resources that victory placed at his disposal, furnished the
store from which to build God's house. In like fashion Christ builds His
Church, and blesses the human race. With the spoils of His battle He
adorns His bride. The prey taken from the mighty becomes the strength
and beauty of His sanctuary. The prisoners of His love He makes the
servants of mankind.
This "captivity" implies a warfare, even as the ascent of Christ a
previous descending. The Son of God came not into His earthly kingdom as
kings are said to have come sometimes disguised amongst their subjects,
that they might learn better of their state and hear their true mind;
nor as the Greeks fabled of their gods, who wandered unknown on earth
seeking adventure and wearied haply of the cloying felicities of heaven,
suffering contempt and doing to men hard service. He came, the Good
Shepherd, to seek lost sheep. He came, the Mighty One of God, to destroy
the works of the devil, to drive out "the strong one armed" who held the
fortress of man's soul. He had a war to wage with the usurping prince of
the world. In the temptations of the wilderness, in the strife with
disease and demoniac powers, in the debate with Scribes and Pharisees,
in the anguish of Gethsemane and Calvary that conflict was fought out;
and by death He abolished him who holds the power of death, by His blood
He "bought us for God." But with the spoils of victory, He bears the
scars of battle,--tokens glorious for Him, humbling indeed to us, which
will tell for ever how they pierced His hands and feet!
For Him pain and conflict are gone by. It remains to gather in the spoil
of His victory of love, the harvest sown in His tears and His blood. And
what are the trophies of the Captain of our salvation? what the fruit of
His dread passion? For one, there was the dying thief, whom with His
nailed hands the Lord Jesus snatched from a felon's doom and bore from
Calvary to Paradise. There was Mary the Magdalene, out of whom He had
cast seven demons, the first to greet Him risen. There were the three
thousand whom on one day, in the might of His Spirit, the ascended Lord
and Christ took captive in rebel Jerusalem, "lifted from the earth" that
He might draw all men unto Him. And there was the writer of this letter,
once His blasphemer and persecutor. By a look, by a word, Jesus
arrested Saul at the height of his murderous enmity, and changed him
from a Pharisee into an apostle to the Gentiles, from the destroyer into
the wise master-builder of His Church.
St Paul's own case suggested, surely, the application he makes of this
ancient text of the Psalter and lighted up its Messianic import. In the
glory of His triumph Jesus Christ had appeared to make him captive, and
put him at once to service. From that hour Paul was led along
enthralled, the willing bond-slave of the Lord Jesus and celebrant of
His victory. "Thanks be unto God," he cries, "who ever triumphs over us
in the Christ, and makes manifest through us the savour of His knowledge
in every place."[101]
Such, and of such sort are the prisoners of the war of Jesus; such the
gifts that through sinners pardoned and subdued He bestows upon
mankind,--"patterns to those who should hereafter believe." Time would
fail to follow the train of the captives of the love of Christ, which
stretches unbroken and ever multiplying through the centuries to this
day. We, too, in our turn have laid our rebel selves at His feet; and
all that we surrender to Him, by right of conquest He gives over to the
service of mankind.
"His love the conquest more than wins;
To all I shall proclaim:
Jesus the King, the Conqueror reigns;
Bow down to Jesu's name!"
He gives out of the spoil of His war with evil,--gives what He receives.
Yet He gives not _as_ He receives. Everything laid in His hands is
changed by their touch. Publicans and Pharisees become apostles.
Magdalenes are made queens and mothers in His Israel. From the dregs of
our streets He raises up a host of sons to Abraham. From the ranks of
scepticism and anti-Christian hate the Lord Christ wins new champions
and captains for His cause. He coins earth's basest metal into heaven's
fine gold. He takes weak things of the earth and foolish, to strike the
mightiest blows of battle.
What may we not expect from Him who has led captive such a captivity!
What surprises of blessing and miracles of grace there are awaiting us,
that shall fill our mouth with laughter and our tongue with
singing--gifts and succours coming to the Church from unlooked-for
quarters and reinforcements from the ranks of the enemy. And what
discomfitures and captivities are preparing for the haters of the
Lord,--if, at least, the future is to be as the past; and if we may
judge from the apostle's word, and from his example, of the measure of
the gift of Christ.
III. A third line of measurement is supplied in the last word of verse
8, and is drawn out in verses 11 and 12. "He gave gifts _to men_--He
gave some apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, some pastors and
teachers, with a view to the full equipment of the saints for work of
ministration, for building up of the body of Christ." Yes, and some
martyrs, some missionaries, some Church rulers and Christian statesmen,
some poets, some deep thinkers and theologians, some leaders of
philanthropy and helpers of the poor; all given for the same end--to
minister to the life of His Church, to furnish it with the means for
carrying on its mission, and to enable every saint to contribute his
part to the commonwealth of Christ according to the measure of Christ's
gift to each.
Comparison with verse 16 that follows and with verse 7 that precedes,
seems to us to make it clear that we should read, without a comma, the
second and third clauses of verse 12 as continuations of the first. The
"work of ministering" and the "building up of the body of Christ" are
not assigned to special orders of ministry as their exclusive calling.
Such honour have all His saints. It is the office of the clergy to see
that the laity do their duty, of "the ministry" to make each saint a
minister of Christ, to guide, instruct and animate the entire membership
of Christ's body in the work He has laid upon it. Upon this plan the
Christian fellowship was organized and officered in the apostolic times.
Church government is a means to an end. Its primitive form was that best
suited to the age; and even then varied under different circumstances.
It was not precisely the same at Jerusalem and at Corinth; at Corinth in
58, and at Ephesus in 66 A.D. That is the best Church system, under any
given conditions, which serves best to conserve and develope the
spiritual energy of the body of Christ.
The distribution of Church office indicated in verse 11 corresponds
closely to what we find in the Pastoral epistles. The apostle does not
profess to enumerate all grades of ministry. The "deacons" are wanting;
although we know from Philippians i. 1 that this order already existed
in Pauline Churches. _Pastors_ (shepherds)--a title only employed here
by the apostle--is a fitting synonym for the "bishops" (_i.e._,
overseers) of whom he speaks in Acts xx. 28, Philippians i. 1, and
largely in the epistles to Timothy and Titus, whose functions were
spiritual and disciplinary as well as administrative. Addressing the
Ephesian elders at Miletus four years before, St Paul bade them
"shepherd the Church of God."
In 1 Peter v. 1, 2 the same charge is laid by the Jewish apostle upon
his "fellow-elders," that they should "shepherd the flock of God, making
themselves examples" to it; Christ Himself he has previously called
"Shepherd and Bishop of souls" (1 Pet. ii. 25). The expression is
derived from the words of Jesus recorded in John x., concerning the true
and false shepherd of God's flock, and Himself the Good Shepherd,--words
familiar and dear to His disciples.
The office of _teaching_, as in 1 Timothy v. 17, is conjoined with that
of shepherding. From that passage we infer that the freedom of teaching
so conspicuous in the Corinthian Church (1 Cor. xiv. 26, etc.) was still
recognized. Teaching and ruling are not made identical, nor inseparable
functions, any more than in Romans xii. 7, 8; but they were frequently
associated, and hence are coupled together here.--Of apostolic
_evangelists_ we have examples in Timothy and the second Philip;[102]
men outside the rank of the apostles, but who, like them, preached the
gospel from place to place. The name apostles (equivalent to our
_missionaries_) served, in its wider sense, to include ministers of this
class along with those directly commissioned by the Lord Jesus.[103]
The _prophets_,[104] like the apostles and evangelists, belonged to the
Church at large, rather than to one locality. But their gift of
inspiration did not carry with it the claim to rule in the Church. This
was the function of the apostles generally, and of the pastor-bishops,
or elders, locally appointed.
The first three orders (apostles, prophets, evangelists) linked Church
to Church and served the entire body; the last two (pastors and
teachers) had charge of local and congregational affairs. The apostles
(the Twelve and Paul), with the prophets, were the founders of the
Church. Their distinctive functions ceased when the foundation was laid
and the deposit of revealed truth was complete. The evangelistic and
pastoral callings remain; and out of them have sprung all the variety of
Christian ministries since exercised. Evangelists, with apostles or
missionaries, bring new souls to Christ and carry His message into new
lands. Pastors and teachers follow in their train, tending the
ingathered sheep, and labouring to make each flock that they shepherd
and every single man perfect in Christ Jesus.
Marvellous were Christ's "gifts for men" bestowed in the apostolic
ministry. What a gift to the Christian community, for example, was Paul
himself! In his natural endowments, so rich and finely blended, in his
training and early experience, in the supernatural mode of his
conversion, everything wrought together to give to men in the apostle
Paul a man supremely fitted to be Christ's ambassador to the Pagan
world, and for all ages the "teacher of the Gentiles in faith and
truth." "A _chosen vessel_ unto me," said the Lord Jesus, "to bear my
name."
Such a gift to the world was St Augustine: a man of the most powerful
intellect and will, master of the thought and life of his time. Long an
alien from the household of faith, he was saved at last as by miracle,
and utterly subdued to the will of Christ. In the awful crisis of the
fifth century, when the Roman empire was breaking up and the very
foundations of life seemed to be dissolved, it was the work of this
heroic man to reassert the sovereignty of grace and to re-establish
faith in the Divine order of the world.
Such another gift to men was Martin Luther, the captive of justifying
grace, won from the monastery and the bondage of Rome to set Germany and
Europe free. What a soul of fire, what a voice of power was his! to
whose lips our Lord Christ set the great trumpet of the Reformation; and
he blew a blast that waked the sleeping peoples of the North, and made
the walls of Babylon rock again to their foundation. Such a gift to
Scotland was John Knox, who from his own soul breathed the spirit of
religion into the life of a nation, and gave it a body and organic form
in which to dwell and work for centuries.
Such a gift to England was John Wesley. Can we conceive a richer boon
conferred by the Head of the Church upon the English race than the
raising up of this great evangelist and pastor and teacher, at such a
time as that of his appearance? Standing at the distance of a hundred
years, we are able to measure in some degree the magnitude of this
bestowment. In none of the leaders and commanders whom Christ has given
to His people was there more signally manifest that combination of
faculties, that concurrence of providences and adjustment to
circumstances, and that transforming and attempering influence of grace
in all--the "effectual working in the measure of each single part" of
the man and his history, which marks those special gifts that Christ is
wont to bestow upon His people in seasons of special emergency and
need.
We are passing into a new age, such as none of these great men dreamed
of, an age as exigent and perilous as any that have gone before it. The
ascendency of physical science, the political enfranchisement of the
masses, the universal spread of education, the emancipation of critical
thought, the gigantic growth of the press, the enormous increase and
aggregation of wealth, the multiplication of large cities, the
world-wide facilities of intercourse,--these and other causes more
subtle are rapidly transforming human society. Old barriers have
disappeared; while new difficulties are being created, of a magnitude to
overtask the faith of the strongest. The Church is confronted with
problems larger far in their dimensions than those our fathers knew.
Demands are being made on her resources such as she has never had to
meet before. Shall we be equal to the needs of the coming times?--Nay,
that is not the question; but will _He_?
There is nothing new or surprising to the Lord Jesus in the progress of
our times and the developments of modern thought, nothing for which He
is not perfectly prepared. He has taken their measure long ere this, and
holds them within His grasp. The government is upon His shoulders--"the
weight of all this unintelligible world"--and He can bear it well. He
has gifts in store for the twentieth century, when it arrives, as
adequate as those He bestowed upon the first or fifth, upon the
sixteenth or the eighteenth of our era. There are Augustines and Wesleys
yet to come. Hidden in the Almighty's quiver are shafts as polished and
as keen as any He has used, which He will launch forth in the war of the
ages at the appointed hour. The need, the peril, the greatness of the
time will be the measure of the gift of Christ.
There is a danger, however, in waiting for great leaders and in looking
for signal displays of Christ's power amongst men. His "kingdom comes
not with observation," so that men should say, Lo here! or Lo there! It
steals upon us unforeseen; it is amongst us before we know. "We looked,"
says Rutherford, "that He should take the higher way along the
mountains; and lo, He came by the lower way of the valleys!" While men
listen to the earthquake and the wind rending the mountains, a still,
small voice speaks the message of God to prepared hearts. Rarely can we
measure at the first the worth of Christ's best gifts. When the fruit
appears, after long patience, the world will haply discover when and how
the seed was sown. But not always then.
"The sower, passing onward, was not known;
And all men reaped the harvest as their own."
Those who are most ready to appraise their fellows are constantly at
fault. Our last may prove Christ's first; our first His last! "Each of
us shall give account of himself to God": each must answer for his own
stewardship, and the grace that was given to each. "Let us not therefore
judge one another any more." But let every man see to it that his part
in the building of God's temple is well and faithfully done. Soon the
fire will try every man's work, of what sort it is.
FOOTNOTES:
[99] Comp. Hebrews x. 1, 2, 10-14 with xi. 13-16, 39, 40, xii. 23, 24;
also vi. 12.
[100] The words of David in Browning's _Saul_, turned from the future
tense into the present.
[101] 2 Cor. ii. 14; comp. Eph. ii. 6, 7.
[102] 2 Tim. iv. 5; Acts viii. 26-40, xxi. 8.
[103] In Acts xiv. 4, 14, _Barnabas and Paul_ are "apostles"; 1 Thess.
ii. 6, _Paul and Silas and Timothy_. Comp. Rom. xvi. 7; 2 Cor. viii. 23,
xi. 13; Phil. ii. 25; Rev. ii. 2.
[104] Comp. ch. ii. 20, iii. 5 for the association of _prophets_ with
_apostles_.
CHAPTER XVIII.
_THE GROWTH OF THE CHURCH._
"Till we all attain unto the unity of the faith and of the full
knowledge of the Son of God, unto a full-grown man, unto the measure
of the stature of the fulness of Christ: that we may be no more
children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of
doctrine in the sport of men, in craftiness, unto the scheme of
error; but dealing truly, in love may grow up in all things into
Him, which is the head, _even_ Christ; from whom all the body fitly
framed and knit together, through that which every juncture
supplieth, according to the working in _due_ measure of each several
part, maketh the increase of the body unto the building up of itself
in love."--EPH. iv. 13-16.
We must spend a few moments in unravelling this knotty paragraph and
determining the relation of its involved clauses to each other, before
we can expound it. This passage is enough to prove St Paul's hand in the
letter. No writer of equal power was ever so little of a literary
craftsman. His epistles read, as M. Renan says, like "a rapid
conversation stenographed." Sometimes, as in several places in
Colossians ii., his ideas are shot out in disjointed clauses, hardly
more continuous than shorthand notes; often, as in this epistle, they
pour in a full stream, sentence hurrying after sentence and phrase
heaped upon phrase with an exuberance that bewilders us. In his spoken
address the interpretation of tone and gesture, doubtless, supplied the
syntactical adjustments so often wanting in Paul's written composition.
The gifts pertaining to special office in the Church were bestowed to
promote its corporate efficiency and to further its general growth (vv.
11, 12). Now, the purpose of these endowments sets a _limit_ to their
use. "Christ gave apostles, prophets," and the rest--"_till we all
arrive_ at our perfect manhood and reach the stature of His fulness."
Such is the connexion of verse 13 with the foregoing context. The aim of
the Christian ministry is to make itself superfluous, to raise men
beyond its need. Knowledge and prophesyings, apostolates and pastorates,
the missions of the evangelist and the schools of the teacher will one
day cease; their work will be done, their end gained, when all believers
are brought "to the unity of faith, to the full knowledge of the Son of
God." The work of Christ's servants can have no grander aim, no further
goal lying beyond this. Verse 14, therefore, does not disclose an
ulterior purpose arising out of that affirmed in the previous sentence;
it restates the same purpose. To make men of us (ver. 13) and to prevent
our being children (ver. 14) is the identical object for which apostles,
prophets, pastors, teachers are called to office. The goal marked out
for all believers in the knowledge and the moral likeness of Christ
(ver. 13), is set up that it may direct the Church's course through
dangers shunned and enemies vanquished (ver. 14) to the attainment of
her corporate perfection (vv. 15, 16). The whole thought of this section
turns upon the idea of "the perfecting of the saints" in verse 12. Verse
16 looks backward to this; verse 7 looked forward to it.
So much for the general construction of the period. As to its particular
words and phrases, we must observe:--
(1) The "perfect [full-grown] man" of verse 13 is the _individual_, not
the generic man, not "the one [collective] new man" of chapter ii. 15.
The Greek words for _man_ in these two places differ.[105] The apostle
proposes to the Christian ministry the end that he was himself pursuing,
viz., to "present _every man_ perfect in Christ."[106]
(2) "_Sleight_ of men" (A.V. and R.V.) does not seem to us to express
the precise meaning of the word so translated in verse 14. _Kubeia_
(from _kubos_, a cube, or die) occurs only here in the New Testament; in
classical Greek it appears in its literal sense of _dice-play_,
_gambling_. The interpreters have drawn from this the idea of
_trickery_, _cheating_--the common accompaniment of gambling. But the
kindred verb (_to play dice_, _to gamble_) has another well-established
use in Greek, namely, _to hazard_: this supplies for St Paul's noun the
signification of _sport_ or _hazarding_, preferred by Beza among the
older expositors and by von Soden amongst the newest. _In the sport of
men_, says von Soden: "conduct wanting in every kind of earnestness and
clear purpose. These men _play_ with religion, and with the welfare of
Christian souls." This metaphor accords admirably with that of the
restless waves and uncertain winds[107] just preceding it; while it
leads fittingly to the further qualification "in craftiness," which is
almost an idle synonym after "sleight."
(3) Another rare word is found in this verse, not very precisely
rendered as "wiles"--a translation suiting it better in chapter vi. 11.
Here the noun is singular in number: _methodeia_. It signifies
_methodizing_, _reducing to a plan_; and then, in a bad sense,
_scheming_, _plotting_. "Error" is thus personified: it "schemes," just
as in 2 Thessalonians ii. 7 it "works." Amid the restless speculations
and the unscrupulous perversions of the gospel now disturbing the infant
faith of the Asian Churches, the apostle saw the outline of a great
system of error shaping itself. There was a method in this madness.
_Unto the scheme of error_--into the meshes of its net--those were being
driven who yielded to the prevailing tendencies of speculative thought.
With all its cross currents and capricious movements, it was bearing
steadily in one direction. Reckless pilots steered ignorant souls this
way and that over the wind-swept seas of religious doubt; but they
brought them at last to the same rocks and quicksands.
(4) As the contrast between manhood and childhood links verses 13 and
14, so it is by the contrast of error and craftiness with _truth_ that
we pass from verse 14 to verse 15. "_Speaking_ truth" insufficiently
renders the opening word of the latter verse. The "_dealing_ truly" of
the Revised margin is preferable. In Galatians iv. 16 the apostle
employs the same verb, signifying not truth of speech alone, but of deed
and life (comp. Eph. v. 9). The expression resembles that of 1 John iii.
19: "We are _of the truth_, and shall assure our hearts before Him,"
where truth and love are found in the like union.
(5) The last difficulty of this kind we have to deal with, lies in the
connexion of the clauses of verse 16. "Through every joint of supply" is
an incongruous adjunct to the previous clause, "fitly framed and knit
together," although the rendering "joint" gives this connexion a
superficial aptness. The apostle's word means _juncture_ rather than
_joint_.[108] The _points of contact_ between the members of Christ's
body form the channels of supply through which the entire frame receives
nourishment. The clause "through every juncture of the supply"--an
expression somewhat obscure at the best--points forwards, not backwards.
It describes the means by which the Church of Christ, compacted in its
general framework by those larger ligatures which its ministry furnishes
(vv. 11, 12), builds up its inward life,--through a communion wherein
"each single part" of the body shares, and every tie that binds one
Christian soul to another serves to nourish the common life of grace. We
may paraphrase the sentence thus: "Drawing its life from Christ, the
entire body knit together in a well-compacted frame, makes use of every
link that unites its members and of each particular member in his place
to contribute to its sustenance, thus building itself up in love
evermore."
* * * * *
These difficult verses unfold to us three main conceptions: _The goal of
the Church's life_ (ver. 13), _the malady which arrests its development_
(ver. 14), and _the means and conditions of its growth_ (vv. 15, 16).
I. The mark at which the Church has to arrive is set forth, in harmony
with the tenor of the epistle, in a twofold way,--in its _collective_
and its _individual_ aspects. We must all "unitedly attain the oneness
of the faith and the knowledge of the Son of God"; and we must attain,
each of us, "a perfect manhood, the measure of the stature of the
fulness of Christ."
The "one faith" of the Church's foundation (ver. 5) is, at the same
time, its end and goal. The final unity will be the unfolding of the
primal unity; the implicit will become explicit; the germ will be
reproduced in the developed organism. "The faith" is still, in St Paul,
the _fides qua credimus_, not _quam credimus_; it is the living faith of
all hearts in the same Christ and gospel.[109] When "we all" believe
heartily and understandingly in "the word of truth, the gospel of our
salvation," the goal will be in sight. All our defects are, at the
bottom, deficiencies of faith. We fail to apprehend and appropriate the
fulness of God in Christ. Faith is the essence of the heart's life: it
forms the common consciousness of the body of Christ.
While faith is the central organ of the Church's life, _the Son of God_
is its central object. The dangers assailing the Church and the
divisions threatening its unity, touched His Person; and whatever
touches the Head, vitally affects the health of the body and the
well-being of every member in it. Many had believed in Jesus as the
Christ and received blessing from Him, whose knowledge of Him as the Son
of God was defective. This ignorance exposed their faith to perversion
by the plausible errors circulating in the Churches of Asia Minor.[110]
The haze of speculation dimmed His glory and distorted His image.
Dazzled by the "philosophy and empty deceit" of specious talkers, these
half-instructed believers formed erroneous or uncertain views of Christ.
And a divided Christ makes a divided Church. We may hold divergent
opinions upon many points of doctrine--in regard to Church order and the
Sacraments, in regard to the nature of the future judgement, in regard
to the mode and limits of inspiration, in regard to the dialect and
expression of our spiritual life--and yet retain, notwithstanding, a
large measure of cordial unity and find ourselves able to co-operate
with each other for many Christian purposes. But when our difference
concerns the Person of Christ, it is felt at once to be fundamental.
There is a gulf between those who worship and those who do not worship
the Son of God.
"Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God abideth in
him and he in God" (1 John iv. 15). This is the touchstone of catholic
truth that the apostles have laid down; and by this we must hold fast.
The kingship of the Lord Jesus is the rallying-point of Christendom. In
His name we set up our banners. There are a thousand differences we can
afford to sink and quarrels we may well forget, if our hearts are one
towards Him. Let me meet a man of any sect or country, who loves and
worships my Lord Christ with all his mind and strength, he is my
brother; and who shall forbid us "with one mind and one mouth to glorify
the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ"? It is nothing but our
ignorance of Him, and of each other, that prevents us doing this
already. Let us set ourselves again to the study of Christ. Let us
strive "all of us" to "attain to the full knowledge of the Son of God";
it is the way to reunion. As we approach the central revelation, and the
glory of Christ who is the image of God shines in its original
brightness upon our hearts, prejudices will melt away; the opinions and
interests and sentiments that divide us will be lost in the transcendent
and absorbing vision of the one Lord Jesus Christ.
"Names and sects and parties fall:
Thou, O Christ, art all in all!"
The second and third _unto_ of verse 13 are parallel with the first, and
with each other. A truer faith and better knowledge of Christ uniting
believers to each other, at the same time develope in each of them a
riper character. Jesus Christ was the "perfect man." In Him our nature
attained, without the least flaw or failure, its true end,--which is to
glorify God. In His fulness the plenitude of God is embodied; it is made
human, and attainable to faith. In Jesus Christ humanity rose to its
ideal stature; and we see what is the proper level of our nature, the
dignity and worth to which we have to rise. We are "predestinated to be
conformed to the image of God's Son." All the many brethren of Jesus
measure themselves against the stature of the Firstborn; and they will
have to say to the end with St Paul: "Not as though I had attained,
either were already perfect. I follow after; I press towards the mark."
A true heart that has seen perfection, will never rest short of it.
"Till we arrive--till we _all_ arrive" at this, the work of the
Christian ministry is incomplete. Teachers must still school us, pastors
shepherd us, evangelists mission us. There is work enough and to spare
for them all--and will be, to all appearance, for many a generation to
come. The goal of the regenerate life is never absolutely won; it is hid
with Christ in God. But there is to be a constant approximation to it,
both in the individual believer and in the body of Christ's people. And
a time is coming when that goal will be practically attained, so far as
earthly conditions allow. The Church after long strife will be reunited,
after long trial will be perfected; and Christ will "present her to
Himself" a bride worthy of her Lord, "without spot or wrinkle or any
such thing." Then this world will have had its use, and will give place
to the new heavens and earth.
II. The goal that the apostle marked out, did not appear to him to be in
immediate prospect. The childishness of so many Christian believers
stood in the way of its attainment. In this condition they were exposed
to the seductions of error, and ready to be driven this way and that by
the evil influences active in the world of thought around them. So long
as the Church contains a number of unstable souls, so long she will
remain subject to strife and corruption. When he says in verse 14, "that
we may be _no longer children_ tossed to and fro," etc., this implies
that many Christian believers at that time were of this childish sort,
and were being so distracted and misled. The apostle writes on purpose
to instruct these "babes" and to raise them to a more manly style of
Christian thought and life.[111]
It is a grievous thing to a minister of Christ to see those who for the
time ought to be teachers, fit for the Church's strong meat and the
harder tasks of her service, remaining still infantile in their
condition, needing to be nursed and humoured, narrow in their views of
truth, petty and personal in their aims, wanting in all generous feeling
and exalted thought. Some men, like St Paul himself, advance from the
beginning to a settled faith, to a large intelligence and a full and
manly consecration to God. Others remain "babes in Christ" to the end.
Their souls live, but never thrive. They suffer from every change in the
moral atmosphere, from every new wind of doctrine. These invalids are
objects full of interest to the moral pathologist; they are marked not
unfrequently by fine and delicate qualities. But they are a constant
anxiety to the Church. Till they grow into something more robust they
must remain to crowd the Church's nursery, instead of taking part in her
battle like brave and strenuous men.
The appearance of false doctrine in the Asian Churches made their
undeveloped condition a matter for peculiar apprehension to the apostle.
The Colossian heresy, for example, with which he is dealing at this
present moment, would have no attraction for ripe and settled
Christians. But such a "scheme of error" was exactly suited to catch men
with a certain tincture of philosophy and in general sympathy with
current thought, who had embraced Christianity under some vague sense
of its satisfaction for their spiritual needs, but without an
intelligent grasp of its principles or a thorough experience of its
power.
St Paul speaks of "every wind of _the_ doctrine," having in his mind a
more or less definite form of erroneous teaching, a certain "plan of
error." Reading this verse in the light of the companion letter to
Colossae and the letters addressed to Timothy when at Ephesus a few years
later, we can understand its significance. We can watch the storm that
was rising in the Graeco-Asiatic Churches. The characteristics of early
Gnosticism are well defined in the miniature picture of verse 14. We
note, in the first place, its protean and capricious form, half
Judaistic, half philosophical--ascetic in one direction, libertine in
another: "tossed by the waves, and carried about with every wind." In
the next place, its intellectual spirit,--that of a loose and reckless
speculation: "in the hazarding of men,"--not in the abiding truth of
God. Morally, it was vitiated by "craftiness." And in its issue and
result, this new teaching was leading "to the scheme of error" which the
apostle four years ago had sorrowfully predicted, in bidding farewell to
the Ephesian elders at Miletus (Acts xx.). This scheme was no other than
the gigantic Gnostic system, which devastated the Eastern Churches and
inflicted deep and lasting wounds upon them.
The struggle with legalism was now over and past, at least in its
critical phase. The apostle of the Gentiles had won the battle with
Judaism and saved the Church in its first great conflict. But another
strife is impending (comp. vi. 10); a most pernicious error has made its
appearance within the Church itself. St Paul was not to see more than
the commencement of the new movement, which took two generations to
gather its full force; but he had a true prophetic insight, and he saw
that the strength of the Church in the coming day of trial lay in the
depth and reality of her knowledge of the Son of God.
At every crisis in human thought there emerges some prevailing method of
truth, or of error, the resultant of current tendencies, which unites
the suffrages of a large body of thinkers and claims to embody the
spirit of the age. Such a method of error our own age has produced as
the outcome of the anti-Christian speculation of modern times, in the
doctrines current under the names of Positivism, Secularism, or
Agnosticism. While the Gnosticism of the early ages asserted the
infinite distance of God from the world and the intrinsic evil of
matter, modern Agnosticism removes God still further from us, beyond the
reach of thought, and leaves us with material nature as the one positive
and accessible reality, as the basis of life and law. Faith and
knowledge of the Son of God it banishes as dreams of our childhood. The
supernatural, it tells us, is an illusion; and we must resign ourselves
to be once more without God in the world and without hope beyond death.
This materialistic philosophy gathers to a head the unbelief of the
century. It is the living antagonist of Divine revelation. It supplies
the appointed trial of faith for educated men of our generation, and the
test of the intellectual vigour and manhood of the Church.
III. In the midst of the changing perils and long delays of her history,
the Church is called evermore to press towards the mark of her calling.
The conditions on which her progress depends are summed up in verses 15
and 16.
To the craft of false teachers St Paul would have his Churches oppose
the weapons only of _truth and love_. "Holding the truth in love," they
will "grow up in all things into Christ." Sincere believers, heartily
devoted to Christ, will not fall into fatal error. A healthy life
instinctively repels disease. They "have an anointing from the Holy One"
which is their protection (1 John ii. 20-29). In all that belongs to
godliness and a noble manhood, such natures will expand; temptation and
the assaults of error stimulate rather than arrest their growth. And
with the growth and ripening in her fellowship of such men of God, the
whole Church grows.
Next to the moral condition lies the spiritual condition of
advancement,--viz., the full recognition of _the supremacy and
sufficiency of Christ_. Christ assumes here two opposite relations to
the members of His body. He is the Head _into_ (or _unto_) which we grow
in all things; but at the same time, _from_ whom all the body derives
its increase (ver. 16). He is the perfect ideal for us each; He is the
common source of life and progress for us all. In our individual efforts
after holiness and knowledge, in our personal aspirations and struggles,
Jesus Christ is our model, our constant aim: we "grow into Him" (ver.
15). But as we learn to live for others, as we merge our own aims in the
life of the Church and of humanity we feel, even more deeply than our
personal needs had made us do, our dependence upon Him. We see that the
forces which are at work to raise mankind, to stay the strifes and heal
the wounds of humanity, emanate from the living Christ (ver. 16). He is
the head of the Church and the heart of the world.
The third, practical condition of Church growth is brought out by the
closing words of the paragraph. It is _organization_: "all the body
fitly framed [comp. ii. 21] and knit together." Each local _ecclesia_,
or assembly of saints, will have its stated officers, its regulated and
seemly order in worship and in work. And within this fit frame, there
must be the warm union of hearts, the frank exchange of thought and
feeling, the brotherly counsel in all things touching the kingdom of
God, by which Christian men in each place of their assembling are "knit
together." From these local and congregational centres, the Christian
fellowship spreads out its arms to embrace all that love our Lord Jesus
Christ.
A building or a machine is _fitted_ together by the adjustment of its
parts. A body needs, besides this mechanical construction, a pervasive
life, a sympathetic force _knitting_ it together: "knit together in
love," the apostle says in Colossians ii. 2; and so it is "in love" that
this "body builds up itself." The tense of the participles in the first
part of verse 16 is present (continuous); we see a body in process of
incorporation, whose several organs, imperfectly developed and
imperfectly co-operant, are increasingly drawn to each other and bound
more firmly in one as each becomes more complete in itself. The perfect
Christian and the perfect Church are taking shape at once. Each of them
requires the other for its due realization.
The rest of the sentence, following the comma that we place at "knit
together," has its parallel in Colossians ii. 19: "All the body, through
its junctures and bands being supplied and knit together, increaseth
with the increase of God." According to St Paul's physiology, the
"bands" knit the body together, but the "junctures" are its means of
supply. Each point of contact is a means of nourishment to the frame.
In touch with each other, Christians communicate the life flowing from
the common Head. The apostle would make _Christian intercourse a
universal means of grace_. No two Christian men should meet anywhere,
upon any business, without themselves and the whole Church being the
better for it.
"Wherever two or three are met together in my name," said Jesus, "there
am I in the midst." In the multitude of these obscure and humble
meetings of brethren who love each other for Christ's sake, is the grace
supplied, the love diffused abroad, by which the Church lives and
thrives. The vitality of the Church of Christ does not depend so much
upon the large and visible features of its construction--upon Synods and
Conferences, upon Bishops and Presbyteries and the like, influential and
venerable as these authorities may be; but upon the spiritual
intercourse that goes on amongst the body of its people. "Each several
part" of Christ's great body, "according to the measure" of its
capacity, is required to receive and to transmit the common grace.
However defective in other points of organization, the society in which
this takes place fulfils the office of an ecclesiastical body. It will
grow into the fulness of Christ; it "builds up itself in love." The
primary condition of Church health and progress is that there shall be
an unobstructed flow of the life of grace from point to point through
the tissues and substance of the entire frame.
FOOTNOTES:
[105] =Eis hena kaino anthrôpon= (_homo_), ch. ii. 15; similarly in iv.
22, 24; Rom. vi. 6; 1 Cor. xv. 45, 47, etc. Here =eis andra teleion=
(_vir_); comp. 1 Cor. xiii. 11; James iii. 2. To call the Church =anêr=
would be highly incongruous, in view of ch. v. 23, etc.; comp. 2 Cor.
xi. 2.
[106] Col. i. 22, 28, 29; 2 Tim. ii. 10.
[107] For this association of metaphor, comp. Shakespeare: _Julius
Caesar_, Act V., Scene 1:--
"Blow, wind; swell, billow; and swim, bark!
The storm is up; and all is on the hazard!"
[108] Vulgate: _per omnem juncturam ministrationis_. St Paul's word here
is =dia pasês haphês=, _through every touching_. See Lightfoot's
valuable note on the medical and philosophical use of the word by Greek
authors, in his Commentary on Colossians (ii. 19).
[109] Comp. ch. i. 13: "in whom you also [Gentiles, along with us Jews]
found hope"; also Rom. iii. 29, 30; Tit. i. 4, "my true child according
to _a common faith_."
[110] See the connexion of thought in Col. ii. 8-10, 18, 19.
[111] Compare 1 Cor. ii. 6, iii. 1-3, xiv. 20, xvi. 13; Gal. iv. 19;
Heb. v. 11-14.
ON CHRISTIAN MORALS.
CHAPTER iv. 17--v. 21.
=En kainotêti zôês peripatêsômen.=--ROM. vi. 4.
CHAPTER XIX.
_THE WALK OF THE GENTILES._
"This I say, therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye no longer
walk as the Gentiles also walk, in the vanity of their mind, being
darkened in their understanding, alienated from the life of God
because of the ignorance that is in them, because of the hardening
of their heart; who being past feeling gave themselves up to
lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness."--EPH. iv.
17-19.
Christ has called into existence and formed around Him already a new
world. Those who are members of His body, are brought into another order
of being from that to which they had formerly belonged. They have
therefore to walk in quite another way--"no longer as the Gentiles." St
Paul does not say "as the other Gentiles" (A.V.); for his readers,
though Gentiles by birth (ii. 11), are now of the household of faith and
the city of God. They hold the franchise of the "commonwealth of
Israel." As at a later time the apostle John in his Gospel, though a
born Jew, yet from the standpoint of the new Israel writes of "the Jews"
as a distant and alien people, so St Paul distinguishes his readers from
"the Gentiles" who were their natural kindred.
When he "testifies," with a pointed emphasis, "that _you_ no longer walk
as do indeed the Gentiles," and when in verse 20 he exclaims, "But
_you_ did not thus learn the Christ," it appears that there were those
bearing Christ's name and professing to have learnt of Him who did thus
walk. This, indeed, he expressly asserts in writing to the Philippians
(ch. iii. 18, 19): "Many walk, of whom I told you oftentimes, and now
tell you even weeping,--the enemies of the cross of Christ; whose god is
their belly, and their glory in their shame, who mind earthly things."
We cannot but associate this warning with the apprehension expressed in
verse 14 above. The reckless and unscrupulous teachers against whose
seductions the apostle guards the infant Churches of Asia Minor,
tampered with the morals as well as with the faith of their disciples,
and were drawing them back insidiously to their former habits of
life.[112]
The connexion between the foregoing part of this chapter and that on
which we now enter, lies in the relation of the new life of the
Christian believer to the new community which he has entered. The old
world of Gentile society had formed the "old man" as he then existed,
the product of centuries of debasing idolatry. But in Christ that world
is abolished, and a "new man" is born. The world in which the Asian
Christians once lived as "Gentiles in the flesh," is dead to them.[113]
They are partakers of the regenerate humanity constituted in Jesus
Christ. From this idea the apostle deduces the ethical doctrine of the
following paragraphs. His ideal "new man" is no mere ego, devoted to
his personal perfection; he is part and parcel of the redeemed society
of men; his virtues are those of a member of the Christian order and
commonwealth.
* * * * *
The representation given of Gentile life in the three verses before us
is highly condensed and pungent. It is from the same hand as the lurid
picture of Romans i. 18-32. While this delineation is comparatively
brief and cursory, it carries the analysis in some respects deeper than
does that memorable passage. We may distinguish the main features of the
description, as they bring into view in turn the _mental_, _spiritual_,
and _moral_ characteristics of the existing Paganism. Man's intellect
was confounded; religion was dead; profligacy was flagrant and
shameless.
I. "The Gentiles walk," the apostle says, "in _vanity of their
mind_"--with reason frustrate and impotent; "being _darkened in their
understanding_"--with no clear or settled principles, no sound theory of
life. Similarly, he wrote in Romans i. 21: "They were frustrated in
their reasonings, and their senseless heart was darkened." But here he
seems to trace the futility further back, beneath the "reasonings" to
the "reason" (_nous_) itself. The Gentile mind was deranged at its
foundation. Reason seemed to have suffered a paralysis. Man has
forfeited his claim to be a rational creature, when he worships objects
so degraded as the heathen gods, when he practises vices so detestable
and ruinous.
The men of intellect, who held themselves aloof from popular beliefs,
for the most part confessed that their philosophies were speculative and
futile, that certainty in the greatest and most serious matters was
unattainable. Pilate's question, "What is truth?"--no jesting question
surely--passed from lip to lip and from one school of thought to
another, without an answer. Five centuries before this time the human
intellect had a marvellous awakening. The art and philosophy of Greece
sprang into their glorious life, like Athené born from the head of Zeus,
full-grown and in shining armour. With such leaders as Pericles and
Phidias, as Sophocles and Plato, it seemed as though nothing was
impossible to the mind of man. At last the genius of our race had
blossomed; rich and golden fruit would surely follow, to be gathered
from the tree of life. But the blossoms fell, and the fruit proved as
rottenness. Grecian art had sunk into a meretricious skill; poetry was
little more than a trick of words; philosophy, a wrangling of the
schools. Rome towered in the majesty of her arms and laws above the
faded glory of Greece. She promised a more practical and sober ideal, a
rule of world-wide justice and peace and material plenty. But this dream
vanished, like the other. The age of the Caesars was an age of
disillusion. Scepticism and cynicism, disbelief in goodness, despair of
the future possessed men's minds. Stoics and Epicureans, old and new
Academics, Peripatetics and Pythagoreans disputed the palm of wisdom in
mere strife of words. Few of them possessed any earnest faith in their
own systems. The one craving of Athens and the learned was "to hear some
new thing," for of the old things all thinking men were weary. Only
rhetoric and scepticism flourished. Reason had built up her noblest
constructions as if in sport, to pull them down again. "On the whole,
this last period of Greek philosophy, extending into the Christian era,
bore the marks of intellectual exhaustion and impoverishment, and of
despair in the solution of its high problem" (Döllinger). The world
itself admitted the apostle's reproach that "by wisdom it knew not God."
It knew nothing, therefore, to sure purpose, nothing that availed to
satisfy or save it.
Our own age, it may be said, possesses a philosophic method unknown to
the ancient world. The old metaphysical systems failed; but we have
relaid the foundations of life and thought upon the solid ground of
nature. Modern culture rests upon a basis of positive and demonstrated
knowledge, whose value is independent of religious belief. Scientific
discovery has put us in command of material forces that secure the race
against any such relapse as that which took place in the overthrow of
the Graeco-Roman civilization. _Pessimism_ answers these pretensions made
for physical science by her idolaters. Pessimism is the nemesis of
irreligious thought. It creeps like a slow palsy over the highest and
ablest minds that reject the Christian hope. What avails it to yoke
steam to our chariot, if black care still sits behind the rider? to wing
our thoughts with the lightning, if those thoughts are no happier or
worthier than before?
"Civilization contains within itself the elements of a fresh servitude.
Man conquers the powers of nature, and becomes in turn their slave" (F.
W. Robertson). Poverty grows gaunt and desperate by the side of lavish
wealth. A new barbarism is bred in what science grimly calls the
_proletariate_, a barbarism more vicious and dangerous than the old,
that is generated by the inhuman conditions of life under the existing
regime of industrial science.
Education gives man quickness of wit and new capacity for evil or good;
culture makes him more sensitive; refinement more delicate in his
virtues or his vices. But there is no tendency in these forces as we
see them now in operation, any more than in the classical discipline, to
make nobler or better men. Secular knowledge supplies nothing to bind
society together, no force to tame the selfish passions, to guard the
moral interests of mankind. Science has given an immense impetus to the
forces acting on civilized men; it cannot change or elevate their
character. It puts new and potent instruments into our hands; but
whether those instruments shall be tools to build the city of God or
weapons for its destruction, is determined by the spirit of the
wielders. In the midst of his splendid machinery, master of the planet's
wealth and lord of nature's forces, the civilized man at the end of this
boastful century stands with a dull and empty heart--without God. Poor
creature, he wants to know whether "life is worth living"! He has gained
the world, but lost his soul.
In vanity of mind and darkness of reasoning men stumble onwards to the
end of life, to the end of time. The world's wisdom and the lessons of
its history give no hope of any real advance from darkness to light
until, as Plato said, "We are able more safely and securely to make our
journey, borne on some firmer vehicle, on some Divine word."[114] Such a
vehicle those who believe in Christ have found in His teaching. The
moral progress of the Christian ages is due to its guidance. And that
moral progress has created the conditions and given the stimulus to
which our material and scientific progress is due. Spiritual life gives
permanence and value to all man's acquisitions. Both of this world and
of that to come "godliness holds the promise." We are only beginning to
learn how much was meant when Jesus Christ announced Himself as "the
light of the world." He brought into the world a light which was to
shine through all the realms of human life.
II. The delusion of mind in which the nations walked, resulted in a
settled state of _estrangement from God_. They were "alienated from the
life of God."
"Alienated from the commonwealth of Israel," St Paul said in chapter ii.
12,[115] using, as he does here, the Greek perfect participle, which
denotes an abiding fact. These two alienations generally coincide.
Outside the religious community, we are outside the religious life. This
expression gathers to a point what was said in verses 11, 12 of chapter
ii., and further back in verses 1-3; it discloses the spring of the
soul's malady and decay in its separation from the living God. When
shall we learn that in God only is our life? We may exist without God,
as a tree cast out in the desert, or a body wasting in the grave; but
that is not _life_.
Everywhere the apostle moved amongst men who seemed to him
dead--joyless, empty-hearted, weary of an idle learning or lost in
sullen ignorance, caring only to eat and drink till they should die like
the beasts. Their so-called gods were phantasms of the Divine, in which
the wiser of them scarcely even pretended to believe. The ancient
natural pieties--not wholly untouched by the Spirit of God, despite
their idolatry--that peopled with fair fancies the Grecian shores and
skies, and taught the sturdy Roman his manfulness and hallowed his love
of home and city, were all but extinguished. Death was at the heart of
Pagan religion; corruption in its breath. Few indeed were those who
believed in the existence of a wise and righteous Power behind the veil
of sense. The Roman augurs laughed at their own auspices; the priests
made a traffic of their temple ceremonies. Sorcery of all kinds was
rife, as rife as scepticism. The most fashionable rites of the day were
the gloomy and revolting mysteries imported from Egypt and Syria. A
hundred years before, the Roman poet Lucretius expressed, with his
burning indignation, the disposition of earnest and high-minded men
towards the creeds of the later classic times:--
"Humana ante oculos foede cum vita jaceret,
In terris oppressa gravi sub religione,
Quae caput e coeli regionibus ostendebat
Horribili super aspectu mortalibus instans,
Primum Graius homo mortalis tollere contra
Est oculos ausus primusque obsistere contra."[116]
_De Rerum Natura_: Bk. I., 62-67.
How alienated from the life of God were those who conceived such
sentiments, and those whose creed excited this repugnance. And when
amongst ourselves, as it occurs in some unhappy instances, a similar
bitterness is cherished, it is matter of double sorrow,--of grief at
once for the alienation prompting thoughts so dark and unjust towards
our God and Father, and for the misshapen guise in which our holy
religion has been presented to make this aversion possible.
The phrase "alienated from the life of God" denotes an objective
position rather than a subjective disposition, the state and place of
the man who is far from God and and his true life. God exiles sinners
from His presence. By a necessary law, their sin acts as a sentence of
deprivation. Under its ban they go forth, like Cain, from the presence
of the Lord. They can no longer partake of the light of life which
streams forth evermore from God and fills the souls that abide in His
love.
And this banishment was due to the cause already described,--to the
radical perversion of the Gentile mind, which is re-affirmed in the
double prepositional clause of verse 18: "because of the ignorance that
is in them, because of the hardening of their heart." The repeated
preposition (_because of_) attaches the two parallel clauses to the same
predicate. Together they serve to explain this sad estrangement from the
Divine life; the second _because_ supplements the first. It is the
ingrained "ignorance" of men that excludes them from the life of God;
and this ignorance is no misfortune or unavoidable fate, it is due to a
positive "hardening of the heart."
Ignorance is not the mother of devotion, but of indevotion. If men knew
God, they would certainly love and serve Him. St Paul agreed with
Socrates and Plato in holding that virtue is knowledge. The debasement
of the heathen world, he declares again and again, was due to the fact
that it "knew not God."[117] The Corinthian Church was corrupted and its
Christian life imperilled by the presence in it of some who "had not the
knowledge of God" (1 Cor. xv. 33, 34). At Athens, the centre of heathen
wisdom, he spoke of the Pagan ages as "the times of ignorance" (Acts
xvii. 30); and found in this want of knowledge a measure of excuse. But
the ignorance he censures is not of the understanding alone; nor is it
curable by philosophy and science. It has an intrinsic
ground,--"existing _in_ them."
Since the world's creation, the apostle says, God's unseen presence has
been clearly visible (Rom. i. 20). Yet multitudes of men have always
held false and corrupting views of the Divine nature. At this present
time, in the full light of Christianity, men of high intellect and wide
knowledge of nature are found proclaiming in the most positive terms
that God, if He exists, is unknowable. This ignorance it is not for us
to censure; every man must give account of himself to God. There may be
in individual cases, amongst the enlightened deniers of God in our own
days, causes of misunderstanding beyond the will, obstructing and
darkening circumstances, on the ground of which in His merciful and wise
judgement God may "overlook" that ignorance, even as He did the
ignorance of earlier ages. But it is manifest that while this veil
remains, those on whose heart it lies cannot partake in the life of God.
Living in unbelief, they walk in darkness to the end, knowing not
whither they go.
The Gentile ignorance of God was attended, as St Paul saw it, with an
_induration of heart_, of which it was at once the cause and the effect.
There is a wilful stupidity, a studied misconstruction of God's will,
which has played a large part in the history of unbelief. The
Israelitish people presented at this time a terrible example of such
guilty callousness (Rom. xi. 7-10, 25). They professed a mighty zeal for
God; but it was a passion for the deity of their partial and corrupt
imagination, which turned to hatred of the true God and Father of men
when He appeared in the person of His Son. Behind their pride of
knowledge lay the ignorance of a hard and impenitent heart.
In the case of the heathen, hardness of heart and religious ignorance
plainly went together. The knowledge of God was not altogether wanting
amongst them; He "left Himself not without witness," as the apostle told
them (Acts xiv. 17). Where there is, amid whatever darkness, a mind
seeking after truth and right, some ray of light is given, some gleam of
a better hope by which the soul may draw nigh to God,--coming whence or
how perhaps none can tell. The gospel of Christ finds in every new land
souls waiting for God's salvation. Such a preparation for the Lord, in
hearts touched and softened by the preventings of grace, its first
messengers discovered everywhere,--a remnant in Israel and a great
multitude amongst the heathen.
But the Jewish nation as a whole, and the mass of the pagans, remained
at present obstinately disbelieving. They had no perception of the life
of God, and felt no need of it; and when offered, they thrust it from
them. Theirs was another god, "the god of this world," who "blinds the
minds of the unbelieving" (2 Cor. iv. 3, 4). And their "ungodliness and
unrighteousness" were not to be pitied more than blamed. They might have
known better; they were "holding down the truth in unrighteousness,"
putting out the light that was in them and contradicting their better
instincts. The wickedness of that generation was the outcome of a
hardening of heart and blinding of conscience that had been going on for
generations past.
III. By two conspicuous features the decaying Paganism of the Christian
era was distinguished,--its unbelief and its _licentiousness_. In his
letter to the Romans St Paul declares that the second of these
deplorable characteristics was the consequence of the former, and a
punishment for it inflicted by God. Here he points to it as a
manifestation of the hardening of heart which caused their ignorance of
God: "Having lost all feeling, they gave themselves up to
lasciviousness, so as to commit every kind of uncleanness in
greediness."
Upon that brilliant classic civilization there lies a shocking stain of
impurity. St Paul stamps upon it the burning word _Aselgeia
(lasciviousness)_, like a brand on the harlot's brow. The habits of
daily life, the literature and art of the Greek world, the atmosphere of
society in the great cities was laden with corruption. Sexual vice was
no longer counted vice. It was provided for by public law; it was
incorporated into the worship of the gods. It was cultivated in every
luxurious and monstrous excess. It was eating out the manhood of the
Greek and Latin races. From the imperial Caesar down to the horde of
slaves, it seemed as though every class of society had abandoned itself
to the horrid practices of lust.
The "greediness" with which debauchery was then pursued, is at the
bottom self-idolatry, self-deification; it is the absorption of the
God-given passion and will of man's nature in the gratification of his
appetites. Here lies the reservoir and spring of sin, the burning deep
within the soul of him who knows no God but his own will, no law above
his own desire. He plunges into sensual indulgence, or he grasps
covetously at wealth or office; he wrecks the purity, or tramples on the
rights of others; he robs the weak, he corrupts the innocent, he
deceives and mocks the simple--to feed the gluttonous idol of self that
sits upon God's seat within him. The military hero wading to a throne
through seas of blood, the politician who wins power and office by the
sleights of a supple tongue, the dealer on the exchange who supplants
every competitor by his shrewd foresight and unscrupulous daring, and
absorbs the fruit of the labour of thousands of his fellow-men, the
sensualist devising some new and more voluptuous refinement of
vice,--these are all the miserable slaves of their own lust, driven on
by the insatiate craving of the false god that they carry within their
breast.
For the light-hearted Greeks, lovers of beauty and of laughter, self was
deified as Aphrodité, goddess of fleshly desire, who was turned by their
worship into _Aselgeia_,--she of whom of old it was said, "Her house is
the way to Sheol." Not such as the chaste wife and house-keeping mother
of Hebrew praise, but Laïs with her venal charms was the subject of
Greek song and art. Pure ideals of womanhood the classic nations had
once known--or never would those nations have become great and famous--a
Greek Alcestis and Antigoné, Roman Cornelias and Lucretias, noble maids
and matrons. But these, in the dissolution of manners, had given place
to other models. The wives and daughters of the Greek citizens were shut
up to contempt and ignorance, while the priestesses of vice--_hetaerae_
they were called, or _companions_ of men--queened it in their voluptuous
beauty, until their bloom faded and poison or madness ended their fatal
days.
Amongst the Jews whom our Lord addressed, the choice lay between "God
and Mammon"; in Corinth and Ephesus, it was "Christ or Belial." These
ancient gods of the world--"mud-gods," as Thomas Carlyle called
them--are set up in the high places of our populous cities. To the
slavery of business and the pride of wealth men sacrifice health and
leisure, improvement of mind, religion, charity, love of country, family
affection. How many of the evils of English society come from this root
of all evil!
Hard by the temple of Mammon stands that of Belial. Their votaries
mingle in the crowded amusements of the day and rub shoulders with each
other. Aselgeia flaunts herself, wise observers tell us, with increasing
boldness in the European capitals. Theatre and picture-gallery and novel
pander to the desire of the eye and the lust of the flesh. The daily
newspapers retail cases of divorce and hideous criminal trials with
greater exactness than the debates of Parliament; and the appetite for
this garbage grows by what it feeds upon. It is plain to see whereunto
the decay of public decency and the revival of the animalism of pagan
art and manners will grow, if it be not checked by a deepened Christian
faith and feeling.
_Past feeling_ says the apostle of the brazen impudicity of his time.
The loss of the religious sense blunted all moral sensibility. The
Greeks, by an early instinct of their language, had one word for
_modesty_ and _reverence_, for self-respect and awe before the Divine.
There is nothing more terrible than the loss of shame. When immodesty is
no longer felt as an affront, when there fails to rise in the blood and
burn upon the cheek the hot resentment of a wholesome nature against
things that are foul, when we grow tolerant and familiar with their
presence, we are far down the slopes of hell. It needs only the kindling
of passion, or the removal of the checks of circumstance, to complete
the descent. The pain that the sight of evil gives is a divine shield
against it. Wearing this shield, the sinless Christ fought our battle,
and bore the anguish of our sin.
FOOTNOTES:
[112] "The persons here denounced," says Lightfoot on Phil. iii. 18,
"are not the Judaizing teachers, but the antinomian reactionists.... The
stress of Paul's grief lies in the fact that they degraded the true
doctrine of liberty, so as to minister to their profligate and worldly
living." Comp. 1 Peter iv. 3, 4; 2 Peter ii. 18-22.
[113] Comp. Col. ii. 20-iii. 4; Gal. vi. 14, 15.
[114] _Phaeao_: § xxxv.
[115] See p. 129.
[116] "When human life to view lay foully prostrate upon earth, crushed
down under the weight of religion, who showed her head from the quarters
of heaven with hideous aspect lowering upon mortals, a man of Greece
ventured first to lift up his mortal eyes to her face and first to
withstand her to her face" (Munro).
[117] 1 Thess. iv. 5; 2 Thess. i. 8; Gal. iv. 8, 9.
CHAPTER XX.
_THE TWO HUMAN TYPES._
"But ye did not so learn the Christ; if so be that ye heard Him, and
were taught in Him, even as truth is in Jesus: that ye put away, as
concerning your former manner of life, the old man, which waxeth
corrupt after the lusts of deceit; and that ye be renewed in the
spirit of your mind, and put on the new man, which after God hath
been created in righteousness and holiness of the truth."--EPH. iv.
20-24.
_But as for you!_--The apostle points us from heathendom to Christendom.
From the men of blinded understanding and impure life he turns to the
cleansed and instructed. "Not thus did _you_ learn the Christ"--not to
remain in the darkness and filth of your Gentile state.
The phrase is highly condensed. The apostle, in this letter so exuberant
in expression, yet on occasion is as concise as in Galatians. One is
tempted, as Beza suggested[118] and Hofmann insists, to put a stop at
this point and to read: "But with you it is not so:[119] you learned the
Christ!" In spite of its abruptness, this construction would be
necessary, if it were only "the Gentiles" of verse 17 with whose "walk"
St Paul means to contrast that of his readers. But, as we have seen, he
has before his eye a third class of men, unprincipled Christian teachers
(ver. 14), men who had in some sense learnt of Christ and yet walked in
Gentile ways and were leading others back to them.[120] Verse 20, after
all, forms a coherent clause. It points an antithesis of solemn import.
There are genuine, and there are supposed conversions; there are true
and false ways of learning Christ.
Strictly speaking, it is not _Christ_, but _the Christ_ whom St Paul
presumes his readers to have duly learnt.[121] The words imply a
comprehending faith, that knows who and what Christ is and what
believing in Him means, that has mastered His great lessons. To such a
faith, which views Christ in the scope and breadth of His redemption,
this epistle throughout appeals; for its impartation and increase St
Paul prayed the wonderful prayer of the third chapter. When he writes
not simply, "You have believed in Christ," but "You have _learned the
Christ_," he puts their faith upon a high level; it is the faith of
approved disciples in Christ's school. For such men the "philosophy and
vain deceit" of Colossae and the plausibilities of the new "scheme of
error" will have no charm. They have found the treasures of wisdom and
knowledge that are hidden in Christ.
The apostle's confidence in the Christian knowledge of his readers is,
however, qualified in verse 21 in a somewhat remarkable way: "If verily
it is He whom you heard, and in Him that you were taught, as truth is in
Jesus." We noted at the outset the bearing of this sentence on the
destination of the letter. It would never occur to St Paul to question
whether the _Ephesian_ Christians were taught Christ's true doctrine.
If there were any believers in the world who, beyond a doubt, had heard
the truth as in Jesus in its certainty and fulness, it was those amongst
whom the apostle had "taught publicly and from house to house," "not
shunning to declare all the counsel of God" and "for three years night
and day unceasingly with tears admonishing each single one" (Acts xx.
18-35). To suppose these words written in irony, or in a modest
affectation, is to credit St Paul with something like an ineptitude.
Doubt was really possible as to whether all his readers had heard of
Christ aright, and understood the obligations of their faith. Supposing,
as we have done, that the epistle was designed for the Christians of the
province of Asia generally, this qualification is natural and
intelligible.
There are several considerations which help to account for it. When St
Paul first arrived at Ephesus, eight years before this time, he "found
certain disciples" there who had been "baptized into John's baptism,"
but had not "received the Holy Spirit" nor even heard of such a thing
(Acts xix. 1-7). Apollos formerly belonged to this company, having
preached and "taught carefully the things about Jesus," while he "knew
only the baptism of John" (Acts xviii. 25). One very much desires to
know more about this Church of the Baptist's disciples in Asia Minor.
Its existence so far away from Palestine testifies to the power of
John's ministry and the deep impression that his witness to the
Messiahship of Jesus made on his disciples. The ready reception of
Paul's fuller gospel by this little circle indicates that their
knowledge of Jesus Christ erred only by defect; they had received it
from Judaea by a source dating earlier than the day of Pentecost. The
partial knowledge of Jesus current for so long at Ephesus, may have
extended to other parts of the province, where St Paul had not been able
to correct it as he had done in the metropolis.
Judaistic Christians, such as those who at Rome "preached Christ of envy
and strife," were also disseminating an imperfect Christian doctrine.
They limited the rights of uncircumcised believers; they misrepresented
the Gentile apostle and undermined his influence. A third and still more
lamentable cause of uncertainty in regard to the Christian belief of
Asian Churches, was introduced by the rise of Gnosticizing error in this
quarter. Some who read the epistle had, it might be, received their
first knowledge of Christ through channels tainted with error similar to
that which was propagated at Colossae. With the seed of the kingdom the
enemy was mingling vicious tares. The apostle has reason to fear that
there were those within the wide circle to which his letter is
addressed, who had in one form or other heard a different gospel and a
Christ other than the true Christ of apostolic teaching.
Where does he find the test and touchstone of the true Christian
doctrine?--In the historical Jesus: "as there is truth _in Jesus_." Not
often, nor without distinct meaning, does St Paul use the birth-name of
the Saviour by itself. Where he does, it is most significant. He has in
mind the facts of the gospel history; he speaks of "the Jesus"[122] of
Nazareth and Calvary. The Christ whom St Paul feared that some of his
readers might have heard of was not the veritable _Jesus_ Christ, but a
shadowy and notional Christ, lost amongst the crowd of angels, such as
was now being taught to the Colossians. This Christ was neither the
image of God, nor the true Son of man. He supplied no sufficient
redemption from sin, no ideal of character, no sure guidance and
authority to direct the daily walk. Those who followed such a Christ
would fall back unchecked into Gentile vice. Instead of the light of
life shining in the character and words of Jesus, they must resort to
"the doctrines and commandments of men" (Col. ii. 8-23).
Amongst the Gnostics of the second century there was held a distinction
between the human (fleshly and imperfect) _Jesus_ and the Divine
_Christ_, who were regarded as distinct beings, united to each other
from the time of the baptism of Jesus to His death. The critics who
assert the late and non-Pauline authorship of the epistle, assert that
this peculiar doctrine is aimed at in the words before us, and that the
identification of Christ with Jesus has a polemical reference to this
advanced Gnostic error. The verses that follow show that the writer has
a different and entirely practical aim. The apostle points us to our
true ideal, to "the Christ" of all revelation manifest in "the Jesus" of
the gospel. Here we see "the new man created after God," whose nature we
must embody in ourselves. The counteractive of a false spiritualism is
found in the incarnate life of the Son of God. The dualism which
separated God from the world and man's spirit from his flesh, had its
refutation in "the Jesus" of Paul's preaching, whom we see in the Four
Gospels. Those who persisted in the attempt to graft the dualistic
theosophy upon the Christian faith, were in the end compelled to divide
and destroy the Christ Himself. They broke up into _Jesus and Christ_
the unity of His incarnate Person.
It is an entire mistake to suppose that the apostle Paul was indifferent
to the historical tradition of Jesus; that the Christ he taught was a
product of his personal inspiration, of his inward experience and
theological reflection. This preaching of an abstract Christ, distinct
from the actual Jesus, is the very thing that he condemns. Although his
explicit references in the epistles to the teaching of Jesus and the
events of His earthly life are not numerous, they are such as to prove
that the Churches St Paul taught were well instructed in that history.
From the beginning the apostle made himself well acquainted with the
facts concerning Jesus, and had become possessor of all that the earlier
witnesses could relate. His conception of the Lord Jesus Christ is
living and realistic in the highest degree. Its germ was in the visible
appearance of the glorified Jesus to himself on the Damascus road; but
that expanding germ struck down its roots into the rich soil of the
Church's recollections of the incarnate Redeemer as He lived and taught
and laboured, as He died and rose again amongst men. Paul's Christ was
the Jesus of Peter and of John and of our own Evangelists; there was no
other. He warns the Church against all unhistorical, subjective Christs,
the product of human speculation.
* * * * *
The Asian Christians who held a true faith, had received Jesus as the
Christ. So accepting Him, they accepted a fixed standard and ideal of
life for themselves. With Jesus Christ evidently set forth before their
eyes, let them look back upon their past life; let them contrast what
they had been with what they are to be. Let them consider what things
they must "put off" and what "put on," so that they may "be found in
Him."
Strangely did the image of Jesus confront the pagan world; keenly its
light smote on that gross darkness. There stood the Word made
flesh--purity immaculate, love in its very self--shaped forth in no
dream of fancy or philosophy, but in the veritable man Christ Jesus,
born of Mary, crucified under Pontius Pilate,--truth expressed
"In loveliness of perfect deeds,
More strong than all poetic thought."
And this life of Jesus, living in those who loved Him (2 Cor. iv. 11),
ended not when He passed from earth; it passed from land to land,
speaking many tongues, raising up new witnesses at every step as it
moved along. It was not a new system, a new creed, but _new men_ that it
gave the world in Christ's disciples, men redeemed from all iniquity,
noble and pure as sons of God. It was the sight of Jesus, and of men
like Jesus, that shamed the old world, so corrupt and false and hardened
in its sin. In vain she summoned the gates of death to silence the
witnesses of Jesus. At last
"She veiled her eagles, snapped her sword,
And laid her sceptre down;
Her stately purple she abhorred,
And her imperial crown.
She broke her flutes, she stopped her sports,
Her artists could not please;
She tore her books, she shut her courts,
She fled her palaces;
Lust of the eye and pride of life--
She left it all behind,
And hurried, torn with inward strife,
The wilderness to find" (_Obermann once more_).
The Galilean conquered! The new man was destined to convict and destroy
the old. "God sending His Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for
sin, condemned sin in the flesh" (Rom. viii. 3). When Jesus lived, died,
and rose again, an inconceivable revolution in human affairs had been
effected. The cross was planted on the territory of the god of this
world; its victory was inevitable. The "grain of wheat" fell into the
ground to die: there might be still a long, cruel winter; many a storm
and blight would delay its growth; but the harvest was secure. Jesus
Christ was the type and the head of a new moral order, destined to
control the universe.
To see the new and the old man side by side was enough to assure one
that the future lay with Jesus. Corruption and decrepitude marked every
feature of Gentile life. It was gangrened with vice,--"wasting away in
its deceitful lusts."
St Paul had before his eyes, as he wrote, a conspicuous type of the
decaying Pagan order. He had appealed as a citizen of the empire to
_Caesar_ as his judge. He was in durance as _Nero's_ prisoner, and was
acquainted with the life of the palace (Phil. i. 13). Never, perhaps,
has any line of rulers dominated mankind so absolutely or held in their
single hand so completely the resources of the world as did the Caesars
of St Paul's time. Their name has ever since served to mark the summit
of autocratic power. It was, surely, the vision of Tiberius sitting at
Rome that Jesus saw in the wilderness, when "the devil showed Him all
the kingdoms of the world and their glory; and said, All this hath been
delivered to me, and to whomsoever I will I give it." The Emperor was
the topstone of the splendid edifice of Pagan civilization, that had
been rearing for so many ages. And Nero was the final product and
paragon of the Caesarean house!
At this epoch, writes M. Renan,[123] "_Nero and Jesus_, Christ and
Antichrist, stand opposed, confronting each other, if I may dare to say
so, like heaven and hell.... In face of Jesus there presents itself a
monster, who is the ideal of evil as Jesus of goodness.... Nero's was an
evil nature, hypocritical, vain, frivolous, prodigiously given to
declamation and display; a blending of false intellect, profound
wickedness, cruel and artful egotism carried to an incredible degree of
refinement and subtlety.... He is a monster who has no second in
history, and whose equal we can only find in the pathological annals of
the scaffold.... The school of crime in which he had grown up, the
execrable influence of his mother, the stroke of parricide forced upon
him, as one might say, by this abominable woman, by which he had entered
on the stage of public life, made the world take to his eyes the form of
a horrible comedy, with himself for the chief actor in it. At the moment
we have now reached [when St Paul entered Rome], Nero had detached
himself completely from the philosophers who had been his tutors. He had
killed nearly all his relations. He had made the most shameful follies
the common fashion. A large part of Roman society, following his
example, had descended to the lowest level of debasement. The cruelty of
the ancient world had reached its consummation.... The world had touched
the bottom of the abyss of evil; it could only reascend."
Such was the man who occupied at this time the summit of human power and
glory,--the man who lighted the torch of Christian martyrdom and at
whose sentence St Paul's head was destined to fall, the Wild Beast of
John's awful vision. Nero of Rome, the son of Agrippina, embodied the
triumph of Satan as the god of this world. Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of
Mary, reigned only in a few loving and pure hearts. Future history, as
the scroll of the Apocalypse unfolded it, was to be the battle-field of
these confronting powers, the war of Christ with Antichrist.
Could it be doubtful, to any one who had measured the rival forces, on
which side victory must fall? St Paul pronounces the fate of the whole
kingdom of evil in this world, when he declares that "the old man" is
"perishing, according to the lusts of deceit." It is an application of
the maxim he gave us in Galatians vi. 8: "He that soweth to his own
flesh, shall of the flesh reap corruption." In its mad sensuality and
prodigal lusts, the vile Roman world he saw around him was speeding to
its ruin. That ruin was delayed; there were moral forces left in the
fabric of the Roman State, which in the following generations
re-asserted themselves and held back for a time the tide of disaster;
but in the end Rome fell, as the ancient world-empires of the East had
fallen, through her own corruption, and by "the wrath" which is
"revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of
men." For the solitary man, for the household, for the body politic and
the family of nations the rule is the same. "Sin, when it is finished,
bringeth forth death."
The passions which carry men and nations to their ruin are "lusts _of
deceit_." The tempter is the liar. Sin is an enormous fraud. "You shall
not die," said the serpent in the garden; "Your eyes will be opened, and
you will be as God!" So forbidden desire was born, and "the woman _being
deceived_ fell into transgression."
"So glistered the dire Snake, and into fraud
Led Eve, our credulous mother, to the tree
Of prohibition, root of all our woe."
By its baits of sensuous pleasure, and still more by its show of freedom
and power to stir our pride, sin cheats us of our manhood; it sows life
with misery, and makes us self-despising slaves. It knows how to use
God's law as an incitement to transgression, turning the very
prohibition into a challenge to our bold desires. "Sin taking occasion
by the commandment deceived me, and by it slew me." Over the pit of
destruction play the same dancing lights that have lured countless
generations,--the glitter of gold; the purple robe and jewelled coronet;
the wine moving in the cup; fair, soft faces lit with laughter. The
straying foot and hot desires give chase, till the inevitable moment
comes when the treacherous soil yields, and the pursuer plunges beyond
escape into sin's reeking gulfs. Then the illusion is over. The gay
faces grow foul; the glittering prize proves dust; the sweet fruit turns
to ashes; the cup of pleasure burns with the fire of hell. And the
sinner knows at last that his greed has cheated him, that he is as
foolish as he is wicked.
Let us remember that there is but one way of escape from the
all-encompassing deceit of sin. It is in "learning Christ." Not in
learning _about_ Christ, but in learning _Him_. It is a common artifice
of the great deceit to "wash the outside of cup and platter." The old
man is improved and civilized; he is baptized in infancy and called a
Christian. He puts off many of his old ways, he dresses himself in a
decorous garb and style; and so deceives himself into thinking that he
is new, while his heart is unchanged. He may turn ascetic, and deny this
or that _to_ himself; and yet never deny _himself_. He observes
religious forms and makes charitable benefactions, as though he would
compound with God for his unforsaken sin. But all this is only a
plausible and hateful manifestation of the lusts of deceit. To learn the
Christ, is to learn the way of the cross. "Take my yoke upon you, and
learn of me," He bids us; "for I am meek and lowly in heart." Till we
have done this, we are not even at the beginning of our lesson.
From the perishing old man the apostle turns, in verses 23, 24, to the
new. These two clauses differ in their form of expression more than the
English rendering indicates.[124] When he writes, "that ye be renewed in
the spirit of your mind," it is a _continual rejuvenation_ that he
describes; the verb is present in tense, and the newness implied is that
of recency and youth, newness in point of age. But the "new man" to be
"put on" (ver. 24) is of a _new kind and order_; and in this instance
the verb is of the aorist tense signifying an event, not a continuous
act. The new man is put on when the Christian way of life is adopted,
when we enter personally into the new humanity founded in Christ. We
"put on the Lord Jesus Christ" (Rom. xiii. 14), who covers and absorbs
the old self, even as those who await in the flesh His second advent
will "put on the house from heaven," when "the mortal" in them will be
"swallowed up of life" (2 Cor. v. 2-4). Thus two distinct conceptions of
the life of faith are placed before our minds. It consists, on the one
hand, of a quickening, constantly renewed, in the springs of our
individual thought and will; and it is at the same time the assumption
of another nature, the investiture of the soul with the Divine character
and form of its being.
Borne on the stream of his evil passions, we saw "the old man" in his
"former manner of life," hastening to the gulf of ruin. For the man
renewed in Christ the stream of life flows steadily in the opposite
direction, and with a swelling tide moves upward to God. His knowledge
and love are always growing in depth, in refinement, in energy and joy.
Thus it was with the apostle in his advancing age. The fresh impulses of
the Holy Spirit, the unfolding to his spirit of the mystery of God, the
fellowship of Christian brethren and the interests of the work of the
Church renewed Paul's youth like the eagle's. If in years and toil he is
old, his soul is full of ardour, his intellect keen and eager; the
"outward man decays, but the inward man is renewed day by day."
This new nature had a new birth. The soul reanimating itself perpetually
from the fresh springs that are in God, had in God the beginning of its
renovated life. We have not to create or fashion for ourselves the
perfect life, but to _adopt_ it,--to realize the Christian ideal (ver.
24). We are called to put on the new type of manhood as completely as we
renounce the old (ver. 22). The new man is there before our eyes,
manifest in the person of Jesus Christ, in whom we live henceforth.
When we "learn the Christ," when we have become His true disciples, we
"put on" His nature and "walk in Him." The inward reception of His
Spirit is attended by the outward assumption of His character as our
calling amongst men.
Now, the character of Jesus is human nature as God first formed it. It
existed in His thoughts from eternity. If it be asked whether St Paul
refers, in verse 24, to the creation of Adam in God's likeness, or to
the image of God appearing in Jesus Christ, or to the Christian nature
formed in the regenerate, we should say that, to the apostle's mind, the
first and last of these creations are merged in the second. The Son of
God's love is His primeval image. The race of Adam was created in Christ
(Col. i. 15, 16). The first model of that image, in the natural father
of mankind, was marred by sin and has become "the old man" corrupt and
perishing. The new pattern replacing this broken type is the original
ideal, displayed "in the likeness of sinful flesh"--wearing no longer
the charm of childish innocence, but the glory of sin vanquished and
sacrifice endured--in the Son of God made perfect through suffering.
Through all there has been only one image of God, one ideal humanity.
The Adam of Paradise was, within his limits, what the Image of God had
been in perfectness from eternity. And Jesus in His human personality
represented, under the changed circumstances brought about by sin, what
Adam might have grown to be as a complete and disciplined man.
The qualities which the apostle insists upon in the new man are two:
"_righteousness_ and _holiness_ [or _piety_] of the truth." This is the
Old Testament conception of a perfect life, whose realization the devout
Zacharias anticipates when he sings how God has "shown mercy to our
fathers, in remembrance of His holy covenant, ... that we being
delivered from the hand of our enemies, might serve Him without fear, in
holiness and righteousness before Him all the days of our life."
Enchanting vision, still to be fulfilled! "Righteousness" is the sum of
all that should be in a man's relations towards God's law; "holiness" is
a right disposition and bearing towards God Himself. This is not St
Paul's ordinary word for holiness (_sanctification_, _sanctity_), which
he puts so often at the head of his letters, addressing his readers as
"saints" in Christ Jesus. That other term designates Christian believers
as devoted persons, claimed by God for His own;[125] it signifies
holiness as a calling. The word of our text denotes specifically the
holiness of temper and behaviour--"that becometh saints." The two words
differ very much as _devotedness_ from _devoutness_.[126]
A religious temper, a reverent mind marks the true child of grace. His
soul is full of the loving fear of God. In the new humanity, in the type
of man that will prevail in the latter days when the truth as in Jesus
has been learnt by mankind, justice and piety will hold a balanced sway.
The man of the coming times will not be atheistic or agnostic: he will
be devout. He will not be narrow and self-seeking; he will not be
pharisaic and pretentious, practising the world's ethics with the
Christian's creed: he will be upright and generous, manly and godlike.
FOOTNOTES:
[118] Quid si post =houtôs= distinctionem ascribas? _Vos autem non ita_
(subaudi _facere convenit_), _qui didicistis_, etc.
[119] Comp. Numb. xii. 7; Ps. i. 4; Luke xxii. 26, for this Hebraistic
turn of expression.
[120] Comp. Phil. iii. 2, 18; Titus i. 16.
[121] See pp. 47, 83, 169, 189.
[122] =Esti alêtheia en tô Iêsou.= The article with the proper name is
most significant. It points to the definite image of Jesus, in His
actual person, that was made familiar by the preaching of Paul and the
other apostles.
[123] _L'Antéchrist_, pp. i. ii. 1, 2. This is a powerful and impressive
work, of whose value those who know only the _Vie de Jésus_ can have
little conception. Renan's faults are many and deplorable; but he is a
writer of genius and of candour. His rationalism teems with precious
inconsistencies. One hears in him always the Church bells ringing under
the sea, the witness of a faith buried in the heart and never silenced,
to which he confesses touchingly in the Preface to his _Souvenirs_.
[124] =ananeousthai de tô pneumati tou noos hymôn, kai endysasthai to
kainon anthrôpon, to kata Theo ktisthenta.=
[125] Comp. pp. 29, 30.
[126] It is important to distinguish the Greek adjectives =hagios= and
=hosios=, with their derivatives. See Cremer's _N. T. Lexicon_ on these
words, and Trench's _N. T. Synonyms_, § lxxxviii. Of the latter word, 1
Thess. ii. 10; 1 Tim. i. 9, ii. 8; 2 Tim. iii. 3; Tit. i. 8 are the only
examples in St Paul.
CHAPTER XXI.
_DISCARDED VICES._
"Wherefore, having put away falsehood, 'speak ye truth each one with
his neighbour': for we are members one of another.
"'Be ye angry, and sin not': let not the sun go down upon your
provocation: neither give place to the devil.
"Let him that stole steal no more; but rather let him labour,
working with his hands the thing that is good, that he may have
whereof to give to him that hath need.
"Let no worthless speech proceed out of your mouth, but such as is
good for edifying as the need may be, that it may give grace to them
that hear. And grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, in whom ye were
sealed unto the day of redemption.
"Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and railing
be put away from you, with all malice: and be ye kind one to
another, tenderhearted, forgiving each other, even as God also in
Christ forgave you. Be ye therefore imitators of God, as beloved
children; and walk in love, even as the Christ also loved you, and
gave Himself up for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God for an
odour of a sweet smell.
"But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not
even be named among you, as becometh saints; nor filthiness, nor
foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not befitting: but rather
giving of thanks. For this ye know of a surety, that no fornicator,
nor unclean person, nor covetous man, which is an idolater, hath any
inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. Let no man deceive you
with empty words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of
God upon the sons of disobedience."--EPH. iv. 25--v. 6.
The transformation described in the last paragraph (vv. 17-24) has now
to be carried into detail. The vices of the old heathen self must be
each of them replaced by the corresponding graces of the new man in
Christ Jesus.
The peculiarity of the instructions given by the apostle for this
purpose does not lie in the virtues enjoined, but in the light in which
they are set and the motives by which they are inculcated. The common
conscience condemns lying and theft, malice and uncleanness; they were
denounced with eloquence by heathen moralists. But the ethics of the New
Testament differed in many respects from the best moral philosophy: in
its direct appeal to the conscience, in its vigour and decision, in the
clearness with which it traced our maladies to the heart's alienation
from God; but most of all, in the remedy which it applied, the new
principle of faith in Christ. The surgeon's knife lays bare the root of
the disease; and the physician's hand pours in the healing balm.
Let us observe at the outset that St Paul deals with the actual and
pressing temptations of his readers. He recalls what they had been, and
forbids them to be such again. The associations and habits of former
life, the hereditary force of evil, the atmosphere of Gentile society,
and added to all this, as we discover from chapter v. 6, the persuasions
of the sophistical teachers now beginning to infest the Church, tended
to draw the Asian Christians back to Gentile ways and to break down the
moral distinctions that separated them from the pagan world.
Amongst the discarded vices of the forsaken Gentile life, the following
are here distinguished: _lying_, _theft_, _anger_, _idle speech_,
_malice_, _impurity_, _greed_. These may be reduced to sins of temper,
of word, and of act. Let us discuss them in the order in which they are
brought before us.
1. "The falsehood"[127] of verse 25 is the antithesis of "the truth"
from which righteousness and holiness spring (ver. 24). In accepting the
one, Paul's Gentile readers "had put off" the other. When these heathen
converts became Christians, they renounced the great lie of idolatry,
the system of error and deceit on which their lives were built. They
have passed from the realm of illusion to that of truth. "Now," the
apostle says, "let your daily speech accord with this fact: you have
bidden farewell to falsehood; _speak_ truth each with his neighbour."
The true religion breeds truthful men; a sound faith makes an honest
tongue. Hence there is no vice more hateful than jesuitry, nothing more
shocking than the conduct of those who defend what they call "the truth"
by disingenuous arts, by tricks of rhetoric and the shifts of an
unscrupulous partizanship. "Will you speak unrighteously for God, and
talk deceitfully for Him?" _As Christ's truth is in me_ cries the
apostle, when he would give the strongest possible assurance of the fact
he wishes to assert.[128] The social conventions and make-believes, the
countless simulations and dissimulations by which the game of life is
carried on belong to the old man with his lusts of deceit, to the
universal lie that runs through all ungodliness and unrighteousness,
which is in the last analysis the denial of God.
St Paul applies here the words of Zechariah viii. 16, in which the
prophet promises to restored Israel better days on the condition that
they should "speak truth each with his neighbour, and judge truth and
the judgement of peace in their gates. And let none of you," he
continues, "imagine evil in his heart against his neighbour; and love no
false oath. For all these things do I hate, saith the Lord." Such is the
law of the New Covenant life. No doubt, St Paul is thinking of the
intercourse of Christians with each other when he quotes this command
and adds the reason, "For we are _members one of another_." But the word
_neighbour_, as Jesus showed, has in the Christian vocabulary no limited
import; it includes the Samaritan, the heathen man and publican. When
the apostle bids his converts "Follow what is good towards one another,
and towards all" (1 Thess. v. 15), he certainly presumes the neighbourly
obligation of truthfulness to be no less comprehensive.
Believers in Christ represent a communion which in principle embraces
all men. The human race is one family in Christ. For any man to lie to
his fellow is, virtually, to lie to himself. It is as if the eye should
conspire to cheat the hand, or the one hand play false to the other.
Truth is the right which each man claims instinctively from his
neighbour; it is the tacit compact that binds together all
intelligences. Without neighbourly and brotherly love perfect
truthfulness is scarcely possible. "Self-respect will never destroy
self-seeking, which will always find in self-interest a side accessible
to the temptations of falsehood" (Harless).
2. Like the first precept, the second is borrowed from the Old
Testament and shaped to the uses of the New. "_Be ye angry_, and sin
not": so the words of Psalm iv. 4 stand in the Greek version and in the
margin of our Revised Bible, where we commonly read, "Stand in awe, and
sin not. Commune with your own heart upon your bed, and be still." The
apostle's further injunction, that anger should be stayed before
nightfall, accords with the Psalmist's words; the calming effect of the
night's quiet the apostle anticipates in the approach of evening. As the
day's heat cools and its strain is relaxed, the fires of anger should
die down. With the Jews, it will be remembered, the new day began at
evening. Plutarch, the excellent heathen moralist contemporary with St
Paul, gives this as an ancient rule of the Pythagoreans: "If at any time
they happened to be provoked by anger to abusive language, before the
sun set they would take each other's hands and embracing make up their
quarrel." If Paul had heard of this admirable prescription, he would be
delighted to recognize and quote it as one of those many facts of
Gentile life which "show the work of the law written in their hearts"
(Rom. ii. 15). The passion which outlives the day, on which the angry
man sleeps and that wakes with him in the morning, takes root in his
breast; it becomes a settled rancour, prompting ill thoughts and deeds.
There is no surer way of tempting the devil to tempt us than to brood
over our wrongs. Every cherished grudge is a "place given" to the
tempter, a new entrenchment for the Evil One in his war against the
soul, from which he may shoot his "fire-tipped darts" (vi. 16). Let us
dismiss with each day the day's vexations, commending as evening falls
our cares and griefs to the Divine compassion and seeking, as for
ourselves, so for those who may have done us wrong forgiveness and a
better mind. We shall rise with the coming light armed with new patience
and charity, to bring into the world's turmoil a calm and generous
wisdom that will earn for us the blessing of the peacemakers, who shall
be called sons of God.
Still the apostle says: "_Be angry_, and sin not." He does not condemn
anger in itself, nor wholly forbid it a place within the breast of the
saint. Wrath is a glorious attribute of God,--perilous, indeed, for the
best of men; but he who cannot be angry has no strength for good. The
apostle knew this holy passion, the flame of Jehovah that burns
unceasingly against the false and foul and cruel. But he knew its
dangers--how easily an ardent soul kindled to exasperation forgets the
bounds of wisdom and love; how strong and jealous a curb the temper
needs, lest just indignation turn to sin, and Satan gain over us a
double advantage, first by the wicked provocation and then by the
uncontrolled resentment it excites.
3. From anger we pass to _theft_.
The eighth commandment is put here in a form indicating that some of the
apostle's readers had been habitual sinners against it. Literally his
words read: "Let him _that steals_ play the thief no more." The Greek
present participle does not, however, necessarily imply a pursuit now
going on, but an habitual or characteristic pursuit, that by which the
agent was known and designated: "Let the thief no longer steal!" From
the lowest dregs of the Greek cities--from its profligate and criminal
classes--the gospel had drawn its converts (comp. 1 Cor. vi. 9-11). In
the Ephesian Church there were converted thieves; and Christianity had
to make of them honest workmen.
The words of verse 28, addressed to a company of thieves, vividly show
the transforming effect of the gospel of Christ: "Let him toil, working
with his hands what is good, that he may have wherewith to give to him
that is in need." The apostle brings the loftiest motives to bear
instantly upon the basest natures, and is sure of a response. He makes
no appeal to self-interest, he says nothing of the fear of punishment,
nothing even of the pride of honest labour. Pity for their fellows, the
spirit of self-sacrifice and generosity is to set those pilfering and
violent hands to unaccustomed toil. The appeal was as wise as it was
bold. Utilitarianism will never raise the morally degraded. Preach to
them thrift and self-improvement, show them the pleasures of an ordered
home and the advantages of respectability, they will still feel that
their own way of life pleases and suits them best. But let the divine
spark of charity be kindled in their breast--let the man have love and
pity and not self to work for, and he is a new creature. His indolence
is conquered; his meanness changed to the noble sense of a common
manhood. Love never faileth.
4. We have passed from speech to temper, and from temper to act; in the
warning of verses 29, 30 we come back to speech again.
We doubt whether _corrupt talk_ is here intended. That comes in for
condemnation in verses 2 and 3 of the next chapter. The Greek adjective
is the same that is used of the "_worthless_ fruit" of the "_worthless_
[_good-for-nothing_] tree" in Matthew xii. 33; and again of the "_bad_
fish" of Matthew xiii. 48, which the fisherman throws away not because
they are corrupt or offensive, but because they are useless for food. So
it is against _inane_, inept and useless talk that St Paul sets his
face. Jesus said that "for _every idle word_ men must give account to
God" (Matt. xii. 36).
Jesus Christ laid great stress upon the exercise of the gift of speech.
"By thy words," He said to His disciples, "thou shalt be justified, and
by thy words condemned." The possession of a human tongue is an immense
responsibility. Infinite good or mischief lies in its power. (With the
tongue we should include the pen, as being the tongue's deputy.) Who
shall say how great is the sum of injury, the waste of time, the
irritation, the enfeeblement of mind and dissipation of spirit, the
destruction of Christian fellowship that is due to thoughtless speech
and writing? The apostle does not simply forbid injurious words, he puts
an embargo on all that is not positively useful. It is not enough to
say: "My chatter does nobody harm; if there is no good in it, there is
no evil." He replies: "If you cannot speak to profit, be silent till you
can."
Not that St Paul requires all Christian speech to be grave and serious.
Many a true word is spoken in jest; and "grace" may be "given to the
hearers" by words clothed in the grace of a genial fancy and playful
wit, as well as in the direct enforcement of solemn themes. It is the
mere talk, whether frivolous or pompous--spoken from the pulpit or the
easy chair--the incontinence of tongue, the flux of senseless,
graceless, unprofitable utterance that St Paul desires to arrest: "let
it not proceed out of your mouth." Such speech must not "escape the
fence of the teeth." It is an oppression to every serious listener; it
is an injury to the utterer himself. Above all, it "grieves the Holy
Spirit."
The witness of the Holy Spirit is the seal of God's possession in
us;[129] it is the assurance to ourselves that we are His sons in
Christ and heirs of life eternal. From the day it is affixed to the
heart, this seal need never be broken nor the witness withheld, "until
the day of redemption." Dwelling within the Church as the guard of its
communion, and loving us with the love of God, the Spirit of grace is
hurt and grieved by foolish words coming from lips that He has
sanctified. As Israel in its ancient rebellions "vexed His Holy Spirit"
(Isai. lxiii. 10), so do those who burden Christian fellowship and who
enervate their own inward life by speech without worth and purpose. As
His fire is quenched by distrust (1 Thess. v. 19), so His love is vexed
by folly. His witness grows faint and silent; the soul loses its joyous
assurance, its sense of the peace of God. When our inward life thus
declines, the cause lies not unfrequently in our own heedless speech. Or
we have listened willingly and without reproof to "words that may do
hurt," words of foolish jesting or idle gossip, of mischief and
backbiting. The Spirit of truth retires affronted from His desecrated
temple, not to return until the iniquity of the lips is purged and the
wilful tongue bends to the yoke of Christ. Let us grieve before the Holy
Spirit, that He be not grieved with us for such offences. Let us pray
evermore: "Set a watch, O Jehovah, before my mouth; keep the door of my
lips."
5. In his previous reproofs the apostle has glanced in various ways at
love as the remedy of our moral disorders and defects. Falsehood, anger,
theft, misuse of the tongue involve disregard of the welfare of others;
if they do not spring from positive ill-will, they foster and aggravate
it. It is now time to deal directly with this evil that assumes so many
forms, the most various of our sins and companion to every other: "Let
all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and railing be put
away from you, with all malice."
The last of these terms is the most typical. _Malice_ is badness of
disposition, the aptness to envy and hatred, which apart from any
special occasion is always ready to break out in bitterness and wrath.
_Bitterness_ is malice sharpened to a point and directed against the
exasperating object. _Wrath_ and _anger_ are synonymous, the former
being the passionate outburst of resentment in rage, the latter the
settled indignation of the aggrieved soul: this passion was put under
restraint already in verses 26, 27. _Clamour_ and _railing_ give audible
expression to these and their kindred tempers. Clamour is the loud
self-assertion of the angry man, who will make every one hear his
grievance; while the railer carries the war of the tongue into his
enemy's camp, and vents his displeasure in abuse and insult.
These sins of speech were rife in heathen society; and there were some
amongst Paul's readers, doubtless, who found it hard to forgo their
indulgence. Especially difficult was this when Christians suffered all
manner of evil from their heathen neighbours and former friends; it cost
a severe struggle to be silent and "keep the mouth as with a bridle"
under fierce and malicious taunts. Never to return evil for evil and
railing for railing, but contrariwise blessing,--this was one of the
lessons most difficult to flesh and blood.
_Kindness_ in act, _tenderheartedness_ of feeling are to take the place
of malice with its brood of bitter passions. Where injury used to be met
with reviling and insult retorted in worse insult, the men of the new
life will be found "forgiving one another, even as God in Christ
forgave" them. Here we touch the spring of Christian virtue, the master
motive in the apostle's theory of life. The cross of Jesus Christ is
the centre of Pauline ethics, as of Pauline theology. The sacrifice of
Calvary, while it is the ground of our salvation, supplies the standard
and incentive of moral attainment. It makes life _an imitation of God_.