MORMONS WRONGED BY A SENSATIONAL PRESS.

Unfortunately the religious and political adventurers in Utah can

succeed in their designs the more readily because the agents sending

out the _Associate Press_ dispatches to the entire press of the country

are in sympathy with these parties or controlled by them; so that all

information going out to the country at large from that source is

generally distorted to the disparagement of the "Mormons."

In addition to this, it will be remembered that the American Press is

nothing if not sensational. This is true in a general sense, it is

doubly so in relation to the "Mormon Question." Ever ready to pander

to the prejudice of the populace, and finding the "Mormon" people the

victims of popular hate and without political influence, the American

Press has recklessly traduced the character of as noble a community as

ever graced God's earth. Every sensational rumor derogatory to their

character has been seized upon with avidity and published without

reserve, while the correction of the mis-statements or the vindication

of their character has seldom struggled through the columns of the

press to the public eye. The people of America, and other countries,

too, have taken everything for granted that has been said against the

"Mormon" people, no matter how absurd it is, or how unreliable the

source from whence it came. Very few men have had the fairness to

investigate "Mormonism" for themselves, or inquire into the character

of the "Mormon" people.

Respecting the misrepresentation of the "Mormon" people and the source

from whence the public has drawn its views and fed its prejudices, I

introduce the testimony of Mr. Phil. Robinson, an English journalist

and correspondent of note, and a traveler of world wide experience;

and who is at present the editor of the _Court and Society Review_,

published in London. Mr. Robinson went to Utah in 1882, where he

remained for three months. He visited nearly every town and village

in the Territory, and saw the people at their firesides and at work

in their fields, as well as in their public meetings--in fact he

saw them in all the relations of life--and on the subject of their

misrepresentation, he says:

"Whence have the public derived their opinions about it [meaning

{178} Mormonism]? From anti-Mormons only. I have ransacked the

literature of the subject, yet I really could not tell any one

where to go for an impartial book about it later in date than

Burton's "City of the Saints" published in 1862. There is not,

to my knowledge, a single Gentile work before the public that

is not utterly unreliable from its distortion of facts. How can

anyone have respect for literature or the men who, without knowing

anything of the lives of Mormons, stigmatize them as profane,

adulterous and drunken? These men write of the squalid poverty of

the Mormons, of their obscene brutality, of their unceasing treason

towards the United States, of their blasphemous repudiation of the

Bible, without one particle of information on the subject, except

such as they gather from the books and writings of men whom they

ought to know are utterly unworthy of credit, or from the verbal

calumnies of apostates; and what the evidence of apostates is

worth history has long ago told us * * * I am now stating facts;

and I, who have lived among the Mormons and with them, can assure

my readers that every day of my residence increased my regret at

the misrepresentation these people have suffered" ("Sinners and

Saints," Roberts and Sons, Boston).

Scrap Book of Mormon Literature (Vol. 1 of 2) Religious Tracts · 第 106 / 294 题