The final failure of Christendom to preserve Eastern Europe from the
infidel may be traced back to the disastrous Fourth Crusade[48] in the
thirteenth century, when Venice, for purely selfish reasons, drove out
the Greek rulers of Constantinople, and helped to establish a Latin or
Frankish Empire. This Empire lasted for fifty-seven years, weak in its
foundation, and growing ever weaker like a badly built house, ready to
tumble to the ground at the first tempest. It pretended to embrace all
the territory that had belonged to its predecessors, but many of the
feudal landowners whom it appointed were never able to take possession
of their estates that remained under independent Greek or Bulgarian
princes, while in Asia Minor the exiled Greek emperors ruled at Nicea,
awaiting an opportunity to cross the Bosporus and effect a triumphant
return.
Michael Paleologus, to whom the opportunity came, was an unscrupulous
adventurer who, on account of his military reputation, had been
appointed guardian of the young Emperor of Nicea, John Ducas, a boy of
eight. Taking advantage of this position, Michael drove from the court
all whom he knew to be disinterested partisans of his charge, and then
declared himself joint emperor with the child. This ambitious claim was
but a step to worse deeds, for before he was ten years old the unhappy
little Emperor had been blinded and thrust into a dungeon by his
co-emperor’s orders, and the Paleologi had become the reigning house of
the Eastern Empire.
[Sidenote: The Eastern Empire]
This was an evil day for Christendom, for though Michael Paleologus
beat down the resistance of all the Greek princes who dared to resent
the way in which he had usurped the throne, and afterwards succeeded in
entering Constantinople, yet neither he nor his descendants were the
type of men to preserve what he had gained. Nearly all the Paleologi
were weak and false: Michael himself so shifty in his dealings that
his friends trusted him less than his enemies. Because he had won his
throne by fraud and cruelty he was always suspicious, like Italian
despots, lest one of his generals should turn against him and outwit
him. Instead, therefore, of keeping his attention fixed on the steadily
increasing power of the Mahometans, an inspection that would have
warned a wise man to maintain a strong army along the borders of the
Empire in Asia Minor, he was so afraid of his own Greek troops that,
once established in Constantinople, he disbanded whole regiments, and
exiled their best officers. Everything he did, in fact, was calculated
merely to secure his immediate safety or advantage, with no thought for
the future, so that he died leaving his kingdom an easy prey to foreign
enemies strong enough to seize the advantage.
[Illustration: The NEAR EAST
in the MIDDLE AGES]
Besides the misrule of Michael Paleologus, other factors were at work,
busily undermining the restored Greek Empire. For one thing, the Greek
and Bulgarian princes, who had obtained independence when the Latins
ruled in Constantinople, had no intention of returning to their old
allegiance; while here and there were feudal states, like the Duchy
of Athens, established by the Latins and still held by them, although
the Frankish Emperor who had been their suzerain had disappeared. The
islands in the Aegean Sea were most of them in Venetian hands, and
Venice took care that the Greek Empire, whose fleet she had swept from
the Mediterranean in the thirteenth century, should not construct
another sufficiently strong to win back these commercial and naval
bases. In the same way the trade that had passed from Constantinople
never returned: for the cities of the Mediterranean preferred to deal
on their own account with Syrian and Egyptian merchants rather than to
pay toll to a ‘middleman’ in the markets of the Paleologi.
For all these reasons it can be easily seen that the new Byzantine
Empire was in a far worse state of weakness and instability than
the old. Like Philip IV of France, who found the financial methods
of Charlemagne quite inadequate for dealing with his more modern
needs and expenses, the Paleologi were confronted by a system of
administering laws and exacting taxes that, having completely broken
down under the strain of foreign invasion, was even more incapable
of meeting fourteenth-century problems with any feasible solution.
More practical rulers might have invented new methods, but the only
hope of the upstart line that had usurped power without realizing
the responsibility such power entailed was to seek the military and
financial aid of the West as in the days of Alexius Commenus.
Little such aid was there to gain. Venice and Genoa, once eager
crusaders, were now too busy contesting the supremacy of the
Mediterranean to act together as allies in Eastern waters. The Popes,
annoyed that the overthrow of the Latin Empire had brought about the
restoration of the Greek Church, were willing enough to consider the
reconversion of Byzantium held out to them as a bait; but even if they
granted their sympathy they had obviously too many political troubles
of their own to make lavish promises likely of fulfilment. Western
Europe, in fact, was too interested in its own national struggles
to answer calls to a crusade, too blind in its narrow self-interest
and prejudice against the Greeks to realize what danger the ruin of
Constantinople must bring on those who had for centuries used her as a
bulwark.
[Sidenote: Turkish Invasion of Europe]
Andronicus II, the son and successor of Michael, was equally cruel
and false, and still more of a personal coward. He saw the danger of
Mahometan invasion that his father had ignored, and, in terror both
of the Turks and of his own subjects, arranged to hire a band of
Catalan mercenaries who had been fighting for the Aragonese against the
Angevins in Sicily, in the war introduced by the Sicilian Vespers.[49]
This war over, the captain of the Catalans, Roger de Flor, a Templar
who had been expelled from his Order for his wild deeds, was quite
willing to unsheathe his sword on a new field of glory and pillage; so
that on receiving dazzling promises of reward and friendship he and his
‘merry men’ sailed for the East.
Once established in Greece, however, the Catalans proved so arrogant
and lawless that the Greeks complained that they were a far worse
infliction than the Mahometans. Quarrels ensued, and finally, in the
course of a bitter dispute between Roger de Flor and Andronicus,
the Spanish general was murdered as he stood talking to his master.
This act of treachery, added to growing indignation at the limited
supplies of money the Emperor had grudgingly disbursed for his foreign
army, turned the Catalans from pretence allies into a horde of raging
enemies. From the walls of Constantinople itself they were driven back,
but elsewhere they burned and slew and laid waste the country, until at
last, reaching Athens, they stormed the walls of that city, killed its
Latin Duke, and established themselves as an independent republic.
By the time they had ceased to rove the Catalans had also ceased
to be dangerous, but in their savage wanderings they had inflicted
incalculable harm upon the Byzantine Empire. The Andronicus who
could barely hold them at bay before the gates of his capital was an
Andronicus who could not hope to withstand invasion in Asia Minor; and
over his Eastern boundaries, left weakly garrisoned since the days of
Michael Paleologus, poured the Turks in irresistible numbers. Soon
there remained to the Greek Empire, of all their provinces across the
Bosporus, merely a strip of coast-line to the north of the Dardanelles,
and finally this also was whittled away, and the Turks crossed the
Straits and captured Gallipoli as a base for future operations in
Europe.
The chief Mahometan Emir during this period of conquest was a certain
Orkhan, the son of Othman, whose name in the form ‘Ottoman’ is still
borne by his branch of the Turkish race. This Orkhan was quite as
cruel and unscrupulous as the Paleologi, but far more statesmanlike;
for as he conquered the territory of Greek Emperors and rival Emirs in
Asia Minor he consolidated his rule over them by a just and careful
government that gradually welded them into a compact state.
When a civil war broke out between John V, the grandson of Andronicus
II, and his guardian and co-ruler, a wily schemer of the Michael
Paleologus type called John Cantacuzenus, the latter, with utter lack
of patriotism, appealed to Orkhan for aid. He even offered him his
daughter in marriage, an alliance to which the Turk eagerly agreed,
dispatching a large force of auxiliaries to Thrace as token of his
friendly intentions towards his future father-in-law. These troops he
determined should remain, and difficult indeed the Christians found
it to dislodge them in later years, for the Turkish legions had been
stiffened by a device of Orkhan which has done more to keep his name in
men’s minds perhaps than any of his victories.
It was the Emir’s custom on a march of conquest not to oppress the
conquered, but to exact from them a tribute both in money and in
child life. From every village that passed under the rule of Orkhan
his soldiers carried away from their homes a fixed number of young
boys, chosen because of their health and sturdy, well-developed limbs.
These children were placed in barracks, where they were educated
without any knowledge of their former life to become soldiers of the
Prophet--fanatical, highly disciplined, skilled with the bow and sabre,
inculcated with but one ideal and ambition--to excel in statecraft or
on the battle-field.
Because of their excessive loyalty emirs would choose from among
the ranks of these ‘tribute children’ their viziers and other chief
officials, while the majority would enter the infantry corps of
‘Janissaries’, or ‘new soldiers’, whose ferocity and endurance in
attacking or holding apparently impossible positions became the terror
of Europe. In the words of a modern historian, ‘With diabolical
ingenuity the Turks secured the victory of the Crescent by the Children
of the Cross, and trained up Christian boys to destroy the independence
and authority of their country and their Church.’
In 1361, some years after Orkhan’s death, the Turks captured
Adrianople, and thus came into contact with other Christian nations
besides the Greeks, namely, the Serbians and Hungarians.
The Serbians were the principal Slav race in the Balkans, and under
their great ruler Stephen Dushan it had seemed likely that they might
become the predominant power in Eastern Europe. The Kings of Bulgaria
and Bosnia were their vassals; they had made conquests both in Albania
and Greece, thus opening up a way to the Adriatic and Aegean Seas. It
would have been well for Christendom if this energetic race of fighters
could have subdued the feeble Greeks, and so presented to the Turks,
when they crossed the Bosporus, a foe worthy to match the Janissaries
in stubborn courage. Unfortunately Stephen Dushan died before the
years of Turkish invasion, leaving his throne to a young son, ‘a youth
of great parts,’ as a Serbian chronicler describes him, ‘quiet and
gracious, but without experience.’
Only experience or an iron will could have held together in those
rough times a kingdom relying for its protection on the swords of
a quarrelsome nobility; and Serbia broke up into a number of small
principalities, her disintegration assisted by the ambitious jealousy
of Louis the Great of Hungary, who lost no opportunity of dismembering
and weakening this sister kingdom that might otherwise prove a
hindrance to his own imperial projects.
With the career of Louis we have dealt in other chapters, and have
seen him humbling the Venetians, driving Joanna I out of Naples,
acquiring the throne of Poland, fighting against the Turks and the
Emperor Charles IV. Because he spent his energy recklessly on all
these projects, Louis remains for posterity, apart from the civilizing
influence of his court life, one of the arch-destroyers of the Middle
Ages, the sovereign who more than any other exposed Eastern Europe to
Mahometan conquest. Had he either refrained from his constant policy
of aggression towards Serbia, thus allowing her to unite her subject
princes in the face of the invading Turks, or had he even been powerful
enough to found an Empire of Hungary that would absorb both Serbia and
Constantinople and act as a bulwark in the East, mediaeval history
would have closed on a different scene. Instead, the famous victories
of Louis over the Turks, that made his name honoured by Christendom,
were rendered of no avail by other partial victories over Christian
nations who should have been his allies.
[Sidenote: Battle of Kossovo]
On the field of Kossovo, in 1389, the Serbians, shorn of half their
provinces and weakened and betrayed by the Hungarians, met the Turks in
battle. Both sides have left record of the ferocity of the struggle.
‘The angels in Heaven’, said the Turks, ‘amazed by the hideous noise,
forgot the heavenly hymns with which they always glorify God.’ ‘The
battle-field became like a tulip-bed with its ruddy severed heads and
rolling turbans.’ ‘Few’, wrote the Serbian chronicler, ‘returned to
their own country.’
When the day closed, both the Serbian king, Lazar, and the Turkish
sultan lay dead amid their warriors, and the victory, as far as the
actual fighting was concerned, seemed to rest neither with Christian
nor Moslem. Yet, in truth, the Turk could supply other armies, as
numerous and as well-equipped, to take the place of those who had
fallen, while the Serbians had exhausted their uttermost effort: thus
the fruits of the battle fell entirely into the hands of the infidel.
‘Things are hard for us, hard since Kossovo,’ is a modern Serbian
saying, for the Serbs have never forgotten the day when they fought
their last despairing battle as champions of the Cross, and lost for a
time their ambition of dominating Eastern Europe.
There resteth to Serbia a glory, (runs the old ballad)
* * * * *
Yea! As long as a babe shall be born,
Or there resteth a man in the land--
So long as a blade of corn
Shall be reaped by a human hand,
So long as the grass shall grow
On the mighty plain of Kossovo--
So long, so long, even so
Shall the glory of those remain
Who this day in battle were slain.
From the day of Kossovo the ultimate conquest of Eastern Europe by the
Turks became a certainty. Lack of ambition on the part of some of the
sultans and a life and death struggle in which others found themselves
involved in Asia Minor against Tartar tribes merely deferred the time
of reckoning, but it came at last in the middle of the fifteenth
century, when Mohammed II, ‘the Conqueror’, determined to reign in
Constantinople.
This Mohammed, famous in mediaeval history, was the son of a Serbian
princess, and he is said to have grown up indifferent alike to
Christianity or Islam. He is described as having ‘a pair of red and
white cheeks full and round, a hooked nose, and a resolute mouth’,
while flatterers went still farther and declared that his moustache
was ‘like leaves over two rosebuds, and every hair of his beard a
thread of gold’. In character, from a fierce, undisciplined boy he grew
into a self-willed man, intent upon the satisfaction of his ambitions
and desires. He could speak, or at least understand, Arabic, Greek,
Persian, Hebrew, and Latin; and chroniclers record that it was in
reading the triumphs of Alexander and Julius Caesar that he was first
inspired with the thought of becoming a great general.
His rival, Constantine XI, the last and best of the Paleologi, was
a man of very different type from the Turk, or indeed from his own
ancestors. He was devoted to the Christian religion and Greece--brave,
simple, and generous. When he first became aware of Mohammed’s
aggressive hostility he attempted to disarm it by liberating Turkish
prisoners. ‘If it shall please God to soften your heart’, he sent word,
‘I shall rejoice; but however that may be, I shall live and die in the
defence of my people and of my Faith.’ His words were put to the test
when, in the autumn of 1452, the siege of Constantinople began.
[Sidenote: Fall of Constantinople]
The Emperor looked despairingly for Western aid, in order to secure
which the Emperor John V had himself in years gone by visited Rome
and made formal renunciation to the Pope of all the views of the
Greek Church that disagreed with Catholic doctrine. One of the chief
points of controversy had been the Catholic use of unleavened bread
in the Sacrament of the Mass; another, the words of the Nicene Creed,
declaring that the Holy Ghost ‘proceeded’ from the Son as well as from
the Father.
In all matters of faith as well as of ecclesiastical jurisdiction
John V, and later Constantine himself, had made open acknowledgement
of the supremacy of Rome, but their compliance did not avail to save
their kingdom in the hour of danger: indeed, while it evoked little
military support from Catholic nations it aroused keen hostility and
treachery at home. There were many Greeks who refused to endorse their
sovereign’s signature to what they considered an act of national
betrayal, some declaring openly that the Mahometan victories were
God’s punishment on kings who had forsaken the faith of their fathers,
and that it would be better to see the turbans of the infidels in St.
Sophia than a cardinal’s red hat.
When, then, Mohammed began to thunder with his fourteen batteries
against the once impregnable walls of Constantinople, making enormous
breaches, the reduction of the city had become only a question of
days. It is said that the Sultan in his eagerness to take possession
offered the Emperor and his army freedom and religious toleration if
they would capitulate. ‘I desire either my throne or a grave,’ replied
Constantine, knowing well which of the two must be his fate.
Beside some four thousand of his own subjects he could command only a
few hundred mercenaries sent by the Pope, and three hundred Genoese.
Of the Venetians and other Western Europeans there were even less; and
it was with this miniature army that he manned the wide circuit of the
walls, led out sorties, and rebuilt as well as he could the gaps made
by the heavy guns.
The contest was absurdly unequal, for Mohammed had some two hundred and
fifty-eight thousand men; and in May 1453 the inevitable end came to a
heroic struggle. Up through the breaches in the wall, that no labour
was left to repair, climbed wave after wave of fanatical Janissaries,
shouting their hopes of victory and Paradise. Beneath their continuous
onslaughts the defenders weakened and broke, fighting to the last amid
the narrow streets, until Constantine himself was slain, his body only
recognized later by the golden eagles embroidered on his shoes.
The women, and many of the Greeks who had refused to help in this time
of crisis because of the Emperor’s submission to the Catholic Church,
were torn from their sanctuary in St. Sophia and sold as slaves in the
markets of Syria.
Thus was lost the second city of Christendom to the infidels, and the
old Roman Empire, whose restoration had been a mediaeval idea for
centuries, perished for ever.
* * * * *
Retribution, at least according to human ideas of justice, often seems
to lag in history; but in the case of the fall of Constantinople
some of the culprits most responsible, on account of their selfish
indifference, were speedily called on to pay the penalty. Mohammed II,
his ambition inflated by what he had already achieved, planned the
reduction of Christendom, declaring that he would feed his horse from
the altar of St. Peter’s in Rome. With an enormous army he advanced
through Serbia and besieged Belgrade; but here he was thrust back by
a Christian champion, John Hunyadi, ‘the wicked one’, as the title
reads in Turkish, with such loss of men and material ‘that Hungary and
eastern Germany were saved from serious danger for eighty years’.
With the Balkan states it was otherwise, whose governments, divided
in their counsels, jealous in their rivalries, had been incapable of
the union that could alone have saved them, and one by one they were
crushed beneath ‘the Conqueror’s’ heel. Greece also came under Moslem
domination, and finally the islands of the Aegean Sea that Venice had
torn from Constantinople in the interests of her trade were wrested
away from her, leaving her faced with the prospect of commercial ruin.