CHAPTER XVII.

ELUCIDATION OF SOME ANCIENT PRODIGIES.

Many of the prodigies recorded by the ancients, admit of a natural

explanation; and an attentive examination will show that a small number

of causes, which may be discerned and developed, will serve for the

explanation of nearly the whole of them. There are two reasons for our

believing accounts of prodigies:--

1. The number and agreement of these accounts, and the confidence to

which the observers and witnesses are entitled.

2. The possibility of dissipating what is wonderful, by ascertaining any

one of the principal causes which might have given to a natural fact a

tinge of the marvellous.

Now, as regards the first reason, the ancients have recorded various

occurrences: for instance, a shower of quicksilver at Rome is mentioned

by Dion Cassius, in the year 197 of our era, and a similar event is

related under the reign of Aurelian. If we attend to phenomena taking

place in our time, such as a shower of blood, tremendous hail stones

weighing a pound each, and containing a stone within them; showers of

frogs, and other almost unaccountable occurrences, we must consign them

to, "the annals in which science has inserted the facts, she has

recognized as such, without as yet pretending to explain them."

Respecting the second reason, the deceptive appearance which nature

sometimes assumes, the exaggeration, almost unavoidable, by partially

informed observers, of the details of a phenomenon, or its duration;

improper, ill-understood, or badly translated expressions, figurative

language, and a practical style; erroneous explanations of emblematical

representations; apologues and allegories adopted as real facts. Such

are the causes, which, singly or together, have frequently swollen with

prodigious fictions the page of history; and it is by carefully removing

this envelope, that elucidations must be sought of what has hitherto

been improperly and disdainfully rejected. A few examples will

illustrate these several positions.

The river Adonis being impregnated, during certain seasons, with volumes

of dust raised from the red soil of that part of Mount Libanus near

which it flows, gave rise to the fable of the periodical effusion of the

blood of Adonis. There is a rock near the Island of Corfu, which bears

the resemblance of a ship under sail: the ancients adapted the story to

the phenomenon, and recognised in it the Phenician ship, in which

Ulysses returned to his country, converted into stone by Neptune, for

having carried away the slayer of his son Polyphemus. A more extensive

acquaintance with the ocean, has shown that this appearance is not

unique; a similar one on the coast of Patagonia, has more than once

deceived both French and English navigators; and rock Dunder, in the

West Indies, bears a resemblance, at a distance equally illusive. There

is another recorded by Captain Hardy, in his recent travels in Mexico,

near the shore of California; and the "story of the flying Dutchman," is

founded on a similar appearance at the Cape of Good Hope, connected with

a tradition which has been long current there among the Dutch colonists.

Another instance is afforded by the chimaera, the solution of which

enigma, as given by Ovid, is so fully substantiated by the very

intelligent British officer who surveyed the Caramania a few years

since. Scylla the sea monster, which devoured six of the rowers of

Ulysses, M. Salverte, a recent compiler on the marvellous, is tempted to

regard as an overgrown polypus magnified by the optical power of poetry,

though we are disposed to give the credit to an alligator, or its mate,

a crocodile; and this occurrence is not so fictitiously represented, as

it is supposed to be.

MAGICAL PRETENSIONS OF CERTAIN HERBS, ETC.

In the enumeration of plants possessing magical properties, Pliny

mentions those which, according to Pythagoras, have the property of

concealing water. Elsewhere, without having resource to magic, he

assigns to hemp an analogous quality. According to him, the juice of

this plant poured into water becomes suddenly inspissated and

congealed. It is probable enough, that he indicated a species of mallow,

the hemp-leaved marsh-mallow, of which the mucilaginous juice produces

this effect to a certain point, and an effect which may also be obtained

from every vegetable as rich in mucilage.

Of vegetable productions, many produce intoxicating effects, such as

berries of the night-shade,[132] scammony, and various species of fungi.

These unquestionably have been made subservient to demonological

purposes, which, with the ignorant, have passed off for supernatural

agency. The priests, to whom the little comparative learning of the dark

ages attached, knew well how to impose upon the credulous: but

imposition was not always their object; an extent of benevolence

prevailed which contemplated the relief of their fellow creatures

afflicted with sickness.

It was maintained by the Egyptians that, besides the gods, there were

many demons which communicated with mortals, and which were often

rendered visible by certain ceremonies and songs; that genii exercised

an habitual and powerful influence over every particle of matter; that

thirty-six of these beings presided over the various members of the

human body; and thus, by magical incantations, it might be strengthened,

or debilitated, afflicted with, or delivered from disease. Thus, in

every case of sickness, the spirit presiding over the afflicted part,

was first duly invoked. But the magicians did not trust solely to their

vain invocations; they were well acquainted with the virtues of certain

herbs, which they wisely employed in their attempts at healing. These

herbs were greatly esteemed: such, for instance, as the _cynocephalia_,

or, as the Egyptians themselves termed the _asyrites_,[133] which was used

as a preventive against witchcraft; and the nepenthes which Helen

presented in a potion to Menelaus, and which was believed to be powerful

in banishing sadness, and in restoring the mind to its accustomed, or

even to greater, cheerfulness, were of Egyptian growth. But whatever may

be the virtues of such herbs, they were used rather for their magical,

than for their medicinal qualities; every cure was cunningly ascribed to

the presiding demons, with which not a few boasted that they were, by

means of their art, intimately connected.

There can be no question, as attested by the earliest records, that the

ancients were in possession of many potent remedies. Melampus of Argos,

the most ancient Greek physician with whom we are acquainted, is reputed

to have cured one of the Argonauts of barrenness, by exhibiting the rust

of iron dissolved in wine, for the space of ten days. The same physician

used hellebore as a purgative on the daughters of King Proteus, who were

labouring under hypochondriasis or melancholy. Bleeding was also a

remedy of very early origin, and said to have been first suggested by

the hypopotamus or sea horse, which at a certain time of the year was

observed to cast itself on the sea shore, and to wound itself among the

rocks or stones, to relieve its plethora. Podalerius, on his return from

the Trojan war, cured the daughter of Damaethus, who had fallen from a

height, by bleeding her in both arms. Opium, the concrete juice of the

poppy, was known in the earliest ages; and probably it was opium that

Helen mixed with wine, and gave to the guests of Menelaus, under the

expressive name of _Nepenthe_, to drown their cares, and encrease their

hilarity. This conjecture, in a considerable degree, is supported from

the fact, that Homer's Nepenthe was procured from the Egyptian Thebes,

whence the tincture of opium, according to the nomenclature of the

pharmacopeia about fifty years ago, and still known by this name in the

older writers; and, if Dr. Darwin may be credited, the Cumaean Sybil

never sat on the portending tripod without first swallowing a few drops

of juice of the cherry-laurel.

There is every reason to believe that the Pagan priesthood were under

the influence of some narcotic preparation during the display of their

oracular power, but the effects produced would seem rather to resemble

those of opium, or perhaps of stramonium, than of prussic acid, which

the cherry-laurel water is known to contain.

The priests of the American Indians, says Monardur, whenever they were

consulted by the chief gentlemen, or _caciques_, as they are called,

took certain leaves of the tobacco, and cast them into the fire, and

then received the smoke thus produced by them into their mouths, which

caused them to fall upon the ground. After having remained in this

position for some time in a state of stupor, they recovered, and

delivered the answers, which they pretended to have received during the

supposed intercourse with the world of spirits.

The narcotic, or sedative influence of the garden radish, was known in

the earliest times. In the fables of antiquity we read, that, after the

death of Adonis, Venus, to console herself, and repress her desires, lay

down upon a bed of lettuces. The sea onion, or squill, was administered

by the Egyptians, in cases of dropsy, under the mystic title of the eye

of Typhon. The practices of incision and scarification, were employed in

the Greek camp at the siege of Troy; and the application of spirits to

wounds, was likewise understood; for we find Nestor applying a poultice

compounded of cheese, onion, and meal, mixed up with the wine of

Pramnos, to the wounds of Machaon.

To bring some inactive substance into repute, as promising some

extraordinary, nay, wonderful medicinal properties, requires only the

sanction of a few great names; and when once established on such a

basis, ingenuity, argument, and even experiment, may open their

otherwise powerful batteries in vain. In this manner all the quack

medicines, ever held in any estimation, got into repute. And the same

vulgar prejudice, which induces people to retain an accustomed remedy

upon bare assertion and presumption, either of ignorance or partiality,

will, in like manner, oppose the introduction of any innovation in

practice with asperity, and not unfrequently with a quantum sufficit of

scrutiny and abuse, unless, indeed, it be supported by authorities of

still greater weight and consideration.

The history of many articles of diet, as well as medicine, amply prove

how much their reputation and fate have depended upon some authority or

other. Ipecacuanha had been imported into England for many years, before

Helvetius, under the patronage of Louis XIV, succeeded in introducing it

into practice in France; and, to the Queen of Charles II., we are

indebted for the introduction of that popular beverage, tea, into

England. Tobacco has suffered as many variable vicissitudes in its fame

and character. It has been successively opposed and commended by

physicians, condemned and praised by priests and kings, and proscribed

and protected by governments, until, at length, this once insignificant

production of a little island, has succeeded in propagating itself

through every climate and country. Nor is the history of the potatoe

less remarkable or less strikingly illustrative of the imperious

influence of authority. This valuable plant, for upwards of two

centuries, received an unprecedented opposition from vulgar prejudice,

which all the philosophy of the age was unable to dissipate, until Louis

XIV. wore a bunch of the flowers of the potatoe, in the midst of his

court, on a day of mirth and festivity. The people then, for the first

time, obsequiously acknowledged its utility, and began to express their

astonishment at the apathy which had so long prevailed with regard to

its general cultivation.

Another instance may be furnished of overbearing authority, in giving

celebrity to a medicine, or in depriving it of that reputation to which

its virtues entitle it, is seen in the history of the Peruvian bark.

This famed medicine was imported into Spain by the Jesuits, where it

remained seven years, before a trial was given to it. A Spanish priest

was the first to whom it was administered, in the year 1639, and even

then its use was extremely limited; and it would undoubtedly have sunk

into oblivion, but for the supreme power of the church of Rome, under

whose protecting auspices it gained a temporary triumph over the

passions and prejudices which opposed its introduction. Pope Innocent X.

at the intercession of the Cardinal de Lugo, who was formerly a Spanish

Jesuit, ordered the bark to be duly examined, and on the favourable

report, which was the result of this examination, it immediately rose

into high favour and celebrity.

The root of the male fern, a nostrum for the cure of the tape worm, was

secretly retailed by Madame Noufleur. This secret was purchased by Louis

XV. for a considerable sum of money. It was not until this event that

the physicans discovered, that the same remedy had been administered in

the same complaint by Galen. The history of popular remedies in the cure

of gout, is equally illustrative of this subject. The Duke of Portland's

celebrated powder was nothing less than the _deacintaureon_ of Caelius

Aurelianus, or the _antidotus et duobus centaurae generibus_ of Aetius,

the receipt for which, a friend of his grace brought with him from

Switzerland, into which country, in all likelihood, it had been

introduced by the early medical writers, who had transcribed it from the

Greek volumes, soon after their arrival into the western part of

Europe.[134]

The active ingredient of a no less celebrated preparation for the same

complaint, the _Eau médicinale_ de Husson, a medicine brought into

fashion by M. de Husson, a military officer in the service of Louis XVI

has been discovered to be the meadow saffron. Upon searching after and

trying the properties of this herb, it was observed that similar effects

in the cure of the gout were ascribed to a certain plant, called

hermodaclyllus, by Oribasius (an eminent physician of the 4th century)

and Aetius, who flourished at Alexandria towards the end of the 5th

century, but more particularly by Alexander of Tralles, a physician of

Asia Minor, whose prescription consisted of hermodaclyllus, ginger,

pepper, cummin seed, aniseed, and scammony, which he says will enable

those who take it to walk immediately. On an inquiry being immediately

set on foot for the discovery of this unknown plant, a specimen of it

was procured at Constantinople, and it actually did turn out to be a

species of meadow saffron, the colchicum autumnale of Linnaeus.

The celebrated fever powder of Dr. James was evidently not his original

composition, but an Italian nostrum, invented by a person of the name of

Lisle; a receipt for the preparation of which is to be found at length

in Colborne's complete English Dispensary for the year 1756. The various

secret preparations of opium which have been extolled as the discovery

of modern days, may be recognised in the works of ancient authors. The

use of prussic acid in the cure of consumptions, lately suggested by M.

Magendie, at Paris, is little more than the revival of the Dutch

practice in this disorder; for Linnaeus informs us, that distilled

laurel water was frequently used in the cure of pulmonary

consumption.[135]

We shall conclude these observations with a few remarks on what are

termed _patent medicines, nostrums_, or _quack medicines_, and their

boasted pretensions in general. There is, in fact, but one state of

perfect health, yet the deviations from this state, and the general

species of diseases are almost infinite. Hence it will easily be

understood, that in the classes of medical remedies, there must likewise

he a great variety, and that some of them are even of opposite

tendencies. Such are both the warm and cold bath considered as medical

remedies. Though opposite to each other in their sensible effects, each

of them manifests its medical virtues, yet only in such a state of the

body as will admit of using it with advantage. From these premises, it

is evident that an universal remedy, or one that possesses healing

powers for the _cure of all diseases_, is, in fact, a non-entity, a mere

delusion, the existence of which is physically impossible, as the mere

idea of such a thing involves a contradiction. How, for instance, can it

he conceived, that the same remedy should be capable of restoring the

tone of the muscular fibres, when they are relaxed, and also have the

power of relaxing them when they are too rigid; that it should coagulate

the fluids when in a state of resolution, and again attenuate them when

they are too viscid; that it should moderate the nerves when in a state

of preturnatural sensibility, and likewise restore them to their proper

degree of irritability when they are in a contrary state.

The belief in an universal remedy has long been abandoned, even among

the vulgar, and long exploded in those classes of society, which are not

influenced by prejudice, or tinctured with fanaticism. It is, however,

sincerely to be regretted, that the daily press continues to be

inundated with advertisements; and that the lower, and less informed

class of the community, are still imposed upon by a set of privileged

impostors, who frequently puzzle the intelligent to decide, whether the

impudence or the industry with which they endeavour to establish the

reputation of their respective poisons, be the most prominent feature in

their character. In illustration of this last observation, it may

further be observed, that most of the nostrums advertised as cough

drops, etc., are preparations of opium, similar, but inferior, to the

well-known paregoric elixir of the shops, but disguised and rendered

more deleterious by the addition of heating and aromatic gums. The

injury which may be occasioned by the indiscriminate employment of such

medicines might be very serious and irremediable, as is well known to

every person possessing the smallest portion of medical knowledge. The

boasted, though groundless pretensions of certain illiterate empirics to

cure diseases which have eluded the skill and penetration of the

faculty, is another absurdity into which people of good common sense

have been most woefully entrapped. The lessons of experience ought to

prove the most useful, as purchased at the greatest trouble and expense;

but if people choose to run over a precipice with their eyes open, they

leave themselves nothing to regret, and the public less to lament, by

their fall.

It was justly observed by the sagacious and intelligent Bacon, "that a

reflecting physician is not directed by the opinion which the multitude

entertain of a favourite remedy, but that be must be guided by a sound

judgment; and consequently, he is led to make very important

distinctions between those things which only by their name pass for

medical remedies, and others, which in reality possess healing powers."

We avail ourselves of the quotation, as it indirectly censures the

conduct of certain medical practitioners, who do not scruple to

recommend what are vulgarly called patent and other quack preparations,

the composition of which is carefully concealed from the public. Having

acquired their unmerited reputation by mere chance, and being supported

by the most refined artifices, in order to delude the unwary, we are

unable to come at the evidence of perhaps nine tenths of those who have

experienced their fatal effects, and who are now no longer in a

situation to complain.

From universal remedies or panaceas, to nostrums and specifics, such,

for instance, as pretend to cure the _same_ disease in every patient, is

easy and natural. With the latter also, impositions of a dangerous

tendency are often practised. It may be asked how far they are

practicably admissible, and in what cases they are wholly unavailing?

The answer is not difficult. In those diseases, which in every instance

depend upon the same cause, as in agues, the small-pox, measles, and

many other contagious distempers, the possibility of specifics, in a

limited sense, may be rationally, though hypothetically admitted. But in

either maladies, the causes of which depend on a variety of other

concurrent circumstances, and the cure of which in different

individuals, frequently requires very opposite remedies, as in dropsy,

various species of colds, the almost infinite variety of consumptions,

etc. a specific remedy is an imposition upon the common sense of

mankind. Those who are but imperfectly acquainted with the various

causes from which the same disorder originates in different individuals,

can never entertain such a vulgar and dangerous notion. They will easily

perceive, how much depends upon ascertaining with precision, the seat

and cause of the complaint, before any medicine can be presented with

safety or advantage:--even life and death are, we are sorry to add, too

often decided by the first steps. Different constitutions, different

symptoms, and stages of disease, all require more or less a separate

consideration. What is more natural than to place confidence in a

remedy, which has been known to afford relief to others in the same kind

of disposition? The patient anxiously enquires after a person who has

been afflicted with the same malady; he is eager to know the remedy that

has been used with success; his friend or neighbour imparts to him the

wished for intelligence; he is determined to give the medicine a fair

trial, and takes it with confidence. From what has been stated, it will

not be difficult to conceive, that if his case does not exactly

correspond with that of his friend, any _chance_ remedy may prove

extremely dangerous, if not fatal.

Hence it becomes evident, that the results are not to be depended upon,

nor the chance risked. The physician is obliged to employ all his

sagacity, supported by his own experience, as well as by that of his

predecessors; and yet he is often under the necessity of discovering,

from the progress of the disease, what he could not derive from the

minutest research. How then can it be expected, that a novice in the art

of healing should be more successful, when the whole of his method of

cure is either the impulse of the moment, or the effect of his own

credulity? It may be therefore truly said, that life and death are

frequently entrusted to chance!

The late Dr. Huxham, a physician of some eminence in his day, when

speaking of Asclepiades, the Roman empiric, says: "This man from a

_declaimer_ turned _physician_, and set himself up to oppose all the

physicians of his time; and the novelty of the thing bore him out, as it

frequently doth the quacks of the present time; and ever _will while the

majority of the world are fools_." In another place, he curiously

contrasts the too timid practice of some regular physicians, with the

hazardous treatment, which is the leading feature of quacks: "The timid,

low, insipid practice with some, is almost as dangerous as the bold,

unwarranted empiricism of others; time and opportunity, never to be

regained, are often lost by the former; while with the latter, by a

_bold push_, you are sent off the stage in a moment."

From what has been said, it may confidently be asserted, that a

universal remedy still remains as great a desideratum as the

philosopher's stone; and either can only obtain credit with the

weak-minded, the credulous, or the fanatic. One of the most unfortunate

circumstances in the history of such medicines, is the insinuating and

dangerous method, by which they are puffed into notice. And as we have

little of the beneficial effects which they daily must produce, by being

promiscuously applied, people attend only to the extraordinary

instances, perhaps not one in fifty, where they have afforded a

temporary or apparent relief. It is well known, that the more powerful

a remedy is, the more permanent and dangerous must be its effects on the

constitution; especially if it be introduced like many patent medicines,

by an almost indefinite encrease of the dose. There is another

consideration, not apt to strike those who are unacquainted with the

laws of the animal economy. When it is intended to bring about any

remarkable change in the system of an organized body, such means are

obliged to be employed as may contribute to produce that change without

affecting too violently the living powers, or without carrying their

action to an improper length. Indeed, the patient may be gradually

habituated to almost any stimulus, but at the expence of a paralytic

stroke on an impaired constitution. Such are among the melancholy

effects of imposture and credulity! "Were it possible," says a learned

authority, "to collect all the cases of sacrifices to the mysterious

infatuation, it is probable that their number would exceed the enormous

havoc made by gunpowder or the sword." Another reputable writer makes

the following terse remark on this subject: "As matters stand at

present," says he, "it is easier to cheat a man out of his life, than of

a shilling: and almost impossible either to detect or punish the

offender. Notwithstanding this, people still shut their eyes, and take

every thing upon trust, that is administered by any pretender to

medicine, without daring to ask him a reason for any part of his

conduct. Implicit faith, every where else the object of ridicule, is

still sacred here."

FOOTNOTES:

[132] The berries of the belladonna or deadly nightshade, produce, when

eaten, a furious madness, followed by sleep, which lasts for twenty-four

hours. Such drugs as produce mental stupefaction, without impairing the

physical powers, may have given rise to the accounts of men being

transformed into brutes, so frequent in what are denominated the

fabulous writers, while the evanescent but exquisite joys of an opposite

description, an anticipation of what implicit obedience would ensure

them for ever, produced blind, furious, devoted adherents to any

philosophical speculator, who would venture to try so desperate an

experiment.

[133] The Rowan tree or Mountain ash, is used by the Scottish peasantry

with the same view; and a small twig of it is sewed up in the cow's

tail, to preserve the animal and its produce from the influence of

witches and warlocks.

[134] See Pharmacologia, by Dr. Paris.

[135] Vide "Amenetates Academicae," vol. 4.

Thaumaturgia; Or, Elucidations of the Marvellous · 第 17 / 22 章