There has been too much abuse of the Regency times. Where mo

Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at

http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images

generously made available by The Internet Archive/American

Libraries.)

THE BRIGHTON ROAD

HISTORIES OF THE ROADS

BY CHARLES G. HARPER.

THE BRIGHTON ROAD: The Classic Highway to the South.

THE GREAT NORTH ROAD: London to York.

THE GREAT NORTH ROAD: York to Edinburgh.

THE DOVER ROAD: Annals of an Ancient Turnpike.

THE BATH ROAD: History, Fashion and Frivolity on an old Highway.

THE MANCHESTER AND GLASGOW ROAD: London to Manchester.

THE MANCHESTER ROAD: Manchester to Glasgow.

THE HOLYHEAD ROAD: London to Birmingham.

THE HOLYHEAD ROAD: Birmingham to Holyhead.

THE HASTINGS ROAD: And The "Happy Springs of Tunbridge."

THE OXFORD, GLOUCESTER AND MILFORD HAVEN ROAD: London to Gloucester.

THE OXFORD, GLOUCESTER AND MILFORD HAVEN ROAD: Gloucester to Milford

Haven.

THE NORWICH ROAD: An East Anglian Highway.

THE NEWMARKET, BURY, THETFORD AND CROMER ROAD.

THE EXETER ROAD: The West of England Highway.

THE PORTSMOUTH ROAD.

THE CAMBRIDGE, KING'S LYNX AND ELY ROAD.

[Illustration: GEORGE THE FOURTH. _From the painting by Sir Thomas

Lawrence, R.A._]

_The_

BRIGHTON ROAD

The Classic Highway to the South

_By_ CHARLES G. HARPER

_Illustrated by the Author, and from old-time

Prints and Pictures_

[Illustration]

LONDON:

CECIL PALMER

OAKLEY HOUSE, BLOOMSBURY STREET, W.C. 1

_First Published_ - 1892

_Second Edition_ - 1906

_Third and Revised Edition_ - 1922

Printed in Great Britain by C. TINLING & CO., LTD.,

53, Victoria Street, Liverpool,

and 187, Fleet Street, London.

PREFACE

_Many years ago it occurred to this writer that it would be an interesting

thing to write and illustrate a book on the Road to Brighton. The genesis

of that thought has been forgotten, but the book was written and

published, and has long been out of print. And there might have been the

end of it, but that (from no preconceived plan) there has since been added

a long series of books on others of our great highways, rendering

imperative re-issues of the parent volume._

_Two considerations have made that undertaking a matter of considerable

difficulty, either of them sufficiently weighty. The first was that the

original book was written at a time when the author had not arrived at a

settled method; the second is found in the fact of the BRIGHTON ROAD being

not only the best known of highways, but also the one most susceptible to

change._

_When it is remembered that motor-cars have come upon the roads since

then, that innumerable sporting "records" in cycling, walking, and other

forms of progression have since been made, and that in many other ways the

road is different, it was seen that not merely a re-issue of the book, but

a book almost entirely re-written and re-illustrated was required. This,

then, is what was provided in a second edition, published in 1906. And now

another, the third, is issued, bringing the story of this highway up to

date._

CHARLES G. HARPER.

_March, 1922._

THE ROAD TO BRIGHTON

MILES

Westminster Bridge (Surrey side) to--

St. Mark's Church, Kennington 1-1/2

Brixton Church 3

Streatham 5-1/2

Norbury 6-3/4

Thornton Heath 8

Croydon (Whitgift's Hospital) 9-1/2

Purley Corner 12

Smitham Bottom 13-1/2

Coulsdon Railway Station 14-1/4

Merstham 17-3/4

Redhill (Market Hall) 20-1/2

Horley ("Chequers") 24

Povey Cross 25-3/4

Kimberham Bridge (Cross River Mole) 26

Lowfield Heath 27

Crawley 29

Pease Pottage 31-1/4

Hand Cross 33-1/2

Staplefield Common 34-3/4

Slough Green 36-1/4

Whiteman's Green 37-1/4

Cuckfield 37-1/2

Ansty Cross 38

Bridge Farm (Cross River Adur) 40-1/4

St. John's Common 40-3/4

"Friar's Oak" Inn 42-3/4

Stonepound 43-1/2

Clayton 44-1/2

Pyecombe 45-1/2

Patcham 48

Withdean 48-3/4

Preston 49-3/4

Brighton (Aquarium) 51-1/2

THE SUTTON AND REIGATE ROUTE

St. Mark's, Kennington 1-1/2

Tooting Broadway 6

Mitcham 8-1/4

Sutton ("Greyhound") 11

Tadworth 16

Lower Kingswood 17

Reigate Hill 19-1/4

Reigate (Town Hall) 20-1/2

Woodhatch ("Old Angel") 21-1/2

Povey Cross 26

Brighton 51-5/8

THE BOLNEY AND HICKSTEAD ROUTE

Hand Cross 33-1/2

Bolney 39

Hickstead 40-1/2

Savers Common 42

Newtimber 44-1/2

Pyecombe 45

Brighton 50-1/2

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

PAGE

George the Fourth Frontispiece

Sketch-map showing Principal Routes to Brighton 4

Stage Waggon, 1808 13

The "Talbot" Inn Yard, Borough, about 1815 17

Me and My Wife and Daughter 19

The "Duke of Beaufort" Coach starting from the "Bull

and Mouth" Office, Piccadilly Circus, 1826 31

The "Age," 1829, starting from Castle Square, Brighton 35

Sir Charles Dance's Steam-carriage leaving London for

Brighton, 1833 39

The Brighton Day Mails crossing Hookwood Common, 1838 43

The "Age," 1852, crossing Ham Common 47

The "Old Times," 1888 51

The "Comet," 1890 55

John Mayall, Junior, 1869 70

The Stock Exchange Walk: E. F. Broad at Horley 83

Miss M. Foster, paced by Motor Cycle, passing Coulsdon 86

Kennington Gate: Derby Day, 1839 95

Streatham Common 101

Streatham 107

The Dining Hall, Whitgift Hospital 111

The Chapel, Hospital of the Holy Trinity 113

Croydon Town Hall 120

Chipstead Church 135

Merstham 139

Gatton Hall and "Town Hall" 144

The Switchback Road, Earlswood Common 148

Thunderfield Castle 150

The "Chequers," Horley 151

The "Six Bells," Horley 153

The "Cock," Sutton, 1789 157

Kingswood Warren 162

The Suspension Bridge, Reigate Hill 163

The Tunnel, Reigate 167

Tablet, Batswing Cottages 172

The Floods at Horley 174

Charlwood 176

A Corner in Newdigate Church 177

On the Road to Newdigate 179

Ifield Mill Pond 180

Crawley: Looking South 183

Crawley, 1789 185

An Old Cottage at Crawley 188

The "George," Crawley 189

Sculptured Emblem of the Holy Trinity, Crawley Church 191

Pease Pottage 197

The "Red Lion," Hand Cross 201

Cuckfield, 1789 203

The Road out of Cuckfield 207

Cuckfield Place 210

The Clock-Tower and Haunted Avenue, Cuckfield Place 211

Harrison Ainsworth 213

Old Sussex Fireback, Ridden's Farm 223

Jacob's Post 224

Clayton Tunnel 233

Clayton Church and the South Downs 235

The Ruins of Slaugham Place 239

The Entrance: Ruins of Slaugham Place 241

Bolney 243

From a Brass at Slaugham 244

Hickstead Place 245

Newtimber Place 247

Pyecombe: Junction of the Roads 249

Patcham 251

Old Dovecot, Patcham 254

Preston Viaduct: Entrance to Brighton 256

The Pavilion 259

The Cliffs, Brighthelmstone, 1789 263

Dr. Richard Russell 265

St. Nicholas, the old Parish Church of Brighthelmstone 269

The Aquarium, before destruction of the Chain Pier 271

THE BRIGHTON ROAD

I

The road to Brighton--the main route, pre-eminently _the_ road--is

measured from the south side of Westminster Bridge to the Aquarium. It

goes by Croydon, Redhill, Horley, Crawley, and Cuckfield, and is (or is

supposed to be) 51-1/2 miles in length. Of this prime route--the classic

way--there are several longer or shorter variations, of which the way

through Clapham, Mitcham, Sutton, and Reigate, to Povey Cross is the

chief. The modern "record" route is the first of these two, so far as Hand

Cross, where it branches off and, instead of going through Cuckfield,

proceeds to Brighton by way of Hickstead and Bolney, avoiding Clayton Hill

and rejoining the initial route at Pyecombe.

[Sidenote: VARIOUS ROUTES]

The oldest road to Brighton is now but little used. It is not to be

indicated in few words, but may be taken as the line of road from London

Bridge, along the Kennington Road, to Brixton, Croydon, Godstone Green,

Tilburstow Hill, Blindley Heath, East Grinstead, Maresfield, Uckfield, and

Lewes; some fifty-nine miles. This is without doubt the most picturesque

route. A circuitous way, travelled by some coaches was by Ewell,

Leatherhead, Dorking, Horsham, and Mockbridge (doubtless, bearing in mind

the ancient mires of Sussex, originally "Muckbridge"), and was 57-1/2

miles in length. An extension of this route lay from Horsham through

Steyning, bringing up the total mileage to sixty-one miles three furlongs.

This multiplicity of ways meant that, in the variety of winding lanes

which led to the Sussex coast, long before the fisher village of

Brighthelmstone became that fashionable resort, Brighton, there were

places on the way quite as important to the old waggoners and carriers as

anything at the end of the journey. They set out the direction, and roads,

when they began to be improved, were often merely the old routes widened,

straightened, and metalled. They were kept very largely to the old lines,

and it was not until quite late in the history of Brighton that the

present "record" route in its entirety existed at all.

Among the many isolated roads made or improved, which did not in the

beginning contemplate getting to Brighton at all, the pride of place

certainly belongs to the ten miles between Reigate and Crawley, originally

made as a causeway for horsemen, and guarded by posts, so that wheeled

traffic could not pass. This was constructed under the Act 8th William

III., 1696, and was the first new road made in Surrey since the time of

the Romans.

It remained as a causeway until 1755, when it was widened and thrown open

to all traffic, on paying toll. It was not only the first road to be made,

but the last to maintain toll-gates on the way to Brighton, the Reigate

Turnpike Trust expiring on the midnight of October 31st, 1881, from which

time the Brighton Road became free throughout.

Meanwhile, the road from London to Croydon was repaired in 1718; and at

the same time the road from London to Sutton was declared to be "dangerous

to all persons, horses, and other cattle," and almost impassable during

five months of the year, and was therefore repaired, and toll-gates set up

along it.

Between 1730 and 1740 Westminster Bridge was building, and the roads in

South London, including the Westminster Bridge Road and the Kennington

Road, were being made. In 1755 the road (about ten miles) across the

heaths and downs from Sutton to Reigate, was authorised, and in 1770 the

Act was passed for widening and repairing the lanes from Povey Cross to

County Oak and Brighthelmstone, by Cuckfield. By this time, it will be

seen, Brighton had begun to be the goal of these improvements.

The New Chapel and Copthorne road, on the East Grinstead route, was

constructed under the Act of 1770, the route across St. John's Common and

Burgess Hill remodelled in 1780, and the road from South Croydon to

Smitham Bottom, Merstham, and Reigate was engineered out of the narrow

lanes formerly existing on that line in 1807-8, being opened, "at present

toll-free," June 4th. 1808.

In 1813 the Bolney and Hickstead road, between Hand Cross and Pyecombe,

was opened, and in 1816 the slip-road, avoiding Reigate, through Redhill,

to Povey Cross. Finally, sixty yards were saved on the Reigate route by

the cutting of the tunnel under Reigate Castle, in 1823. In this way the

Brighton road, on its several branches, grew to be what it is now.

The Brighton Road, it has already been said, is measured from the south

side of Westminster Bridge, which is the proper starting-point for

record-makers and breakers; but it has as many beginnings as Homer had

birthplaces. Modern coaches and motor-car services set out from the

barrack-like hotels of Northumberland Avenue, or other central points, and

the old carriers came to and went from the Borough High Street; but the

Corinthian starting-point in the brave old days of the Regency and of

George the Fourth was the "White Horse Cellar"--Hatchett's "White Horse

Cellar"--in Piccadilly. There, any day throughout the year, the knowing

ones were gathered--with those green goslings who wished to be thought

knowing--exchanging the latest scandal and sporting gossip of the road,

and rooking and being rooked; the high-coloured, full-blooded ancestors of

the present generation, which looks upon them as a quite different order

of beings, and can scarce believe in the reality of those full habits,

those port-wine countenances, those florid garments that were

characteristic of the age.

[Illustration: SKETCH-MAP SHOWING PRINCIPAL ROUTES TO BRIGHTON.]

No one now starts from the "White Horse Cellar," for the excellent reason

that it does not now exist. The original "Cellar" was a queer place.

Figure to yourself a basement room, with sanded floor, and an odour like

that of a wine-vault, crowded with Regency bucks drinking or discussing

huge beef-steaks.

It was situated on the south side of Piccadilly, where the Hotel Ritz now

stands, and is first mentioned in 1720, when it was given its name by

Williams, the landlord, in compliment to the House of Hanover, the

newly-established Royal House of Great Britain, whose cognizance was a

white horse. Abraham Hatchett first made the Cellar famous, both as a

boozing-ken and a coach-office, and removed it to the opposite side of the

street, where, as "Hatchett's Hotel and White Horse Cellar." it remained

until 1884, when the present "Albemarle" arose on its site, with a "White

Horse" restaurant in the basement.

[Sidenote: SPORTSMEN]

What Piccadilly and the neighbourhood of the "White Horse Cellar" were

like in the times of Tom and Jerry, we may easily discover from the

contemporary pages of "Real Life in London," written by one "Bob Tallyho,"

recounting the adventures of himself and "Tom Dashall." A prize-fight was

to be held on Copthorne Common between Jack Randall, "the

Nonpareil"--called in the pronunciation of that time the "Nunparell"--and

Martin, endeared to "the Fancy" as the "Master of the Rolls."[1]

Naturally, the roads were thronged, and "Piccadilly was all in

motion--coaches, carts, gigs, tilburies, whiskies, buggies, dogcarts,

sociables, dennets, curricles, and sulkies were passing in rapid

succession, intermingled with tax-carts and waggons decorated with laurel,

conveying company of the most varied description. Here was to be seen the

dashing _Corinthian_ tickling up his _tits_, and his _bang-up set-out_ of

_blood and bone_, giving the go-by to a _heavy drag_ laden with eight

brawny, bull-faced blades, smoking their way down behind a skeleton of a

horse, to whom, in all probability, a good feed of corn would have been a

luxury; _pattering_ among themselves, occasionally _chaffing_ the more

elevated drivers by whom they were surrounded, and pushing forward their

nags with all the ardour of a British merchant intent upon disposing of a

valuable cargo of foreign goods on 'Change. There was a waggon full of

_all sorts_ upon the _lark_, succeeded by a _donkey-cart_ with four

insides: but _Neddy_, not liking his burthen, stopped short in the way of

a dandy, whose horse's head, coming plump up to the back of the crazy

vehicle at the moment of its stoppage, threw the rider into the arms of a

dustman, who, hugging his _customer_ with the determined grasp of a bear,

swore, d--n his eyes, he had saved his life, and he expected he would

stand something handsome for the Gemmen all round, for if he had not

pitched into their cart he would certainly have broke his neck; which

being complied with, though reluctantly, he regained his saddle, and

proceeded a little more cautiously along the remainder of the road, while

groups of pedestrians of all ranks and appearances lined each side."

On their way they pass Hyde Park Corner, where they encounter one of a

notorious trio of brothers, friends of the Prince Regent and companions of

his in every sort of excess--the Barrymores, to wit, named severally

Hellgate, Newgate, and Cripplegate, the last of this unholy trinity so

called because of his chronic limping; the two others' titles, taken with

the characters of their bearers, are self-explanatory.

Dashall points his lordship out to his companion, who is new to London

life, and requires such explanations.

[Sidenote: LORD CRIPPLEGATE]

"The driver of that tilbury," says he, "is the celebrated Lord

Cripplegate,[2] with his usual equipage; his blue cloak with a scarlet

lining hanging loosely over the vehicle gives an air of importance to his

appearance, and he is always attended by that boy, who has been

denominated his Cupid: he is a nobleman by birth, a gentleman by courtesy

(oh, witty Dashall!), and a gamester by profession. He exhausted a large

estate upon _odd and even_, _seven's the main_, etc., till, having lost

sight of the _main chance_, he found it necessary to curtail his

establishment and enliven his prospects by exchanging a first floor for a

second, without an opportunity of ascertaining whether or not these

alterations were best suited to his high notions or exalted taste; from

which, in a short time, he was induced, either by inclination or

necessity, to take a small lodging in an obscure street, and to sport a

gig and one horse, instead of a curricle and pair, though in former times

he used to drive four-in-hand, and was acknowledged to be an excellent

whip. He still, however, possessed money enough to collect together a

large quantity of halfpence, which in his hours of relaxation he managed

to turn to good account by the following stratagem:--He distributed his

halfpence on the floor of his little parlour in straight lines, and

ascertained how many it would require to cover it. Having thus prepared

himself, he invited some wealthy spendthrifts (with whom he still had the

power of associating) to sup with him, and he welcomed them to his

habitation with much cordiality. The glass circulated freely, and each

recounted his gaming or amorous adventures till a late hour, when, the

effects of the bottle becoming visible, he proposed, as a momentary

suggestion, to name how many halfpence, laid side by side, would carpet

the floor, and offered to lay a large wager that he would guess the

nearest.

"'Done! done!' was echoed round the room. Every one made a deposit of

L100, and every one made a guess, equally certain of success; and his

lordship declaring he had a large stock of halfpence by him, though

perhaps not enough, the experiment was to be tried immediately. 'Twas an

excellent hit!

"The room was cleared; to it they went; the halfpence were arranged rank

and file in military order, when it appeared that his lordship had

certainly guessed (as well he might) nearest to the number. The

consequence was an immediate alteration of his lordship's residence and

appearance: he got one step in the world by it. He gave up his second-hand

gig for one warranted new; and a change in his vehicle may pretty

generally be considered as the barometer of his pocket."

And so, with these piquant biographical remarks, they betook themselves

along the road in the early morning, passing on their way many curious

itinerants, whose trades have changed and decayed, and are now become

nothing but a dim and misty memory; as, for instance, the sellers of warm

"salop," the forerunners of the early coffee-stalls of our own day.

II

But hats off to the Prince of Wales, the Prince Regent, the King! Never,

while the Brighton Road remains the road to Brighton, shall it be

dissociated from George the Fourth, who, as Prince, had a palace at either

end, and made these fifty-odd miles in a very special sense a _Via Regia_.

It was in 1782, when but twenty years of age, that he first knew Brighton,

and until the last--for close upon forty-eight years--it retained his

affections. He is thus the presiding genius of the way; and because, when

we speak or think of the Brighton Road, we cannot help thinking of him, I

have appropriately placed the portrait of George the Fourth, by the

courtly Lawrence, in this book.

The Prince and King was the inevitable product of his times and of his

upbringing: we mostly are. Only the rarest and most forceful figures can

mould the world to their own form.

[Sidenote: THE PRINCE]

The character of George the Fourth has been the theme of writers upon

history and sociology, of essayists, diarists, and gossip-mongers without

number, and most of them have pictured him in very dark colours indeed.

But Horace Walpole, perhaps the clearest-headed of this company, shows in

his "Last Journals" that from his boyhood the Prince was governed in the

stupidest way--in a manner, indeed, but too well fitted to spoil a spirit

so high and so impetuous, and impulses so generous as then were his.

He proves what we may abundantly learn from other sources, that the

narrow-minded and obstinate George the Third, petty and parochial in

public and in private, was jealous of his son's superior parts, and

endeavoured to hide his light beneath the bushel of seclusion and

inadequate training. It was impossible for such a father to appreciate

either the qualities or the defects of such a son. "The uncommunicative

selfishness and pride of George the Third confined him to domestic

virtues," says Walpole, and adds, "Nothing could equal the King's

attention to seclude his son and protract his nonage. It went so absurdly

far that he was made to wear a shirt with a frilled collar like that of

babies. He one day took hold of his collar and said to a domestic, 'See

how I am treated!'"

The Duke of Montagu, too, was charged with the education of the Prince,

and "he was utterly incapable of giving him any kind of instruction....

The Prince was so good-natured, but so uninformed, that he often said, 'I

wish anybody would tell me what I ought to do; nobody gives me any

instruction for my conduct.'" The absolute poverty of the instruction

afforded him, the false and narrow ways of the royal household, and the

evil example and low companionship of his uncle, the Duke of Cumberland,

did much to spoil the Prince.

To quote Walpole again: "It made men smile to find that in the palace of

piety and pride his Royal Highness had learnt nothing but the dialect of

footmen and grooms.... He drunk hard, swore, and passed every night in[3]

...; such were the fruits of his being locked up in the palace of piety."

He proved, too, an intractable and undutiful son; but that was the result

to be expected, and we cannot join Thackeray in his sentimental snivel

over George the Third.

He was a faithless husband, but his wife was impossible, and even the mob

who supported her quailed when the Marquis of Anglesey, baited in front of

his house and compelled to drink her health, did so with the bitter rider,

"And may all your wives be like her!"

All high-spirited young England flocked to the side of the Prince of

Wales. He was the Grand Master of Corinthianism and Tom-and-Jerryism. It

was he who peopled these roads with a numerous and brilliant concourse of

whirling travellers, where before had been only infrequent plodders amidst

the Sussex sloughs. To his princely presence, radiant by the Old Steyne,

hasted all manner of people; prince and prizefighter, statesman and

nobleman; beauties noble and ignoble, and all who _lived_ their lives.

There he made incautious guests helplessly drunk on the potent old brandy

he called "Diabolino," and then exposed them in embarrassing situations;

and there--let us remember it--he entertained, and was the beneficent

patron of, the foremost artists and literary men of his age. The

_Zeitgeist_ (the Spirit of the Time) resided in, was personified in, and

radiated from him. He was the First Gentleman in Europe, but is to us, in

the perspective of a hundred years or so, something more: the type and

exemplar of an age.

He should have been endowed with perennial youth, but even his splendid

vitality faded at last, and he grew stout. Leigh Hunt called him a "fat

Adonis of fifty," and was flung into prison for it; and prison is a

fitting place for a satirist who is stupid enough to see a misdemeanour in

those misfortunes. No one who could help it would be fat, or fifty.

Besides, to accuse one royal personage of being fat is to reflect upon

all: it is an accompaniment of royalty.

Thackeray denounced his wig; but there is a prejudice in favour of flowing

locks, and the King gracefully acknowledged it. One is not damned for

being fat, fifty, and wearing a wig; and it seems a curious code of

morality that would have it so; for although we may not all lose our hair

nor grow fat, we must all, if we are not to die young, grow old and pass

the grand climacteric.

There has been too much abuse of the Regency times. Where modern

moralists, folded within their little sheep-walks from observation of the

real world, mistake is in comparing those times with these, to the

disadvantage of the past. They know nothing of life in the round, and

seeing it only in the flat, cannot predicate what exists on the other

side. To them there is, indeed, no other side, and things, despite the

poet, _are_ what they seem, and nothing else.

They lash the manners of the Regency, and think they are dealing out

punishment to a bygone state of things; but human nature is the same in

all centuries. The fact is so obvious that one is ashamed to state it. The

Regency was a terrible time for gambling; but Tranby Croft had a similar

repute when Edward the Seventh was Prince of Wales. Bridge is a fine game,

and what, think you, supports the evening newspapers? The news? Certainly:

the Betting News. Cock-fighting was a brutal sport, and is now illegal,

but is it dead? Oh dear, no. Virtue was not general in the picturesque

times of George the Fourth. Is it now? Study the Cause Lists of the

Divorce Courts. Worse offences are still punished by law, but are later

condoned or explained by Society as an eccentricity. Society a hundred

years ago did not plumb such depths.

In short, behind the surface of things, the Regency riot not only exists,

but is outdone, and Tom and Jerry, could they return, would find

themselves very dull dogs indeed. It is all the doing of the middle

classes, that the veil is thrown over these things. In times when the

middle class and the Nonconformist Conscience traditionally lived at

Clapham, it mattered comparatively little what excesses were committed;

but that class has so increased that it has to be subdivided into Upper

and Lower, and has Claphams of its own everywhere. It is--or they

are--more wealthy than before, and they read things, you know, and are a

power in Parliament, and are something in the dominie sort to those other

classes above and below.

III

[Sidenote: SOCIETY: THEN AND NOW]

The coaching and waggoning history of the road to Brighthelmstone (as it

then was called) emerges dimly out of the formless ooze of tradition in

1681. In De Laune's "Present State of Great Britain," published in that

year, in the course of a list of carriers, coaches, and stage-waggons in

and out of London, we find Thomas Blewman, carrier, coming from

"Bredhempstone" to the "Queen's Head," Southwark, on Wednesdays, and,

setting forth again on Thursdays, reaching Shoreham the same day: which

was remarkably good travelling for a carrier's waggon in the seventeenth

century. Here, then, we have the Father Adam, the great original, so far

as records can tell us, of all the after charioteers of the Brighton Road.

It is not until 1732, that, from the pages of "New Remarks on London,"

published by the Company of Parish Clerks, we hear anything further. At

that date a coach set out on Thursdays from the "Talbot," in the Borough

High Street, and a van on Tuesdays from the "Talbot" and the "George." In

the summer of 1745 the "Flying Machine" left the "Old Ship,"

Brighthelmstone at 5.30 a.m., and reached Southwark in the evening.

But the first extended and authoritative notice is found in 1746, when the

widow of the Lewes carrier advertised in _The Lewes Journal_ of December

8th that she was continuing the business:

THOMAS SMITH, the OLD LEWES CARRIER, being dead, THE BUSINESS IS NOW

CONTINUED BY HIS WIDOW, MARY SMITH, who gets into the "George Inn," in

the Borough, Southwark, EVERY WEDNESDAY in the afternoon, and sets out

for Lewes EVERY THURSDAY morning by eight o'clock, and brings Goods

and Passengers to Lewes, Fletching, Chayley, Newick and all places

adjacent at reasonable rates.

Performed (_if God permit_) by

MARY SMITH.

We may perceive by these early records that the real original way down to

the Sussex coast was by the Croydon, Godstone, East Grinstead and Lewes

route, and that its outlet must have been Newhaven, which, despite its

name, is so very ancient a place, and was a port and harbour when

Brighthelmstone was but a fisher-village.

[Illustration: STAGE WAGGON, 1808. _From a contemporary drawing._]

That is the only glimpse we get of the widow Smith and her waggon; but the

"George Inn, in the Borough," that she "got into," is still in the

Borough High Street. It is a fine and flourishing remnant of an ancient

galleried hostelry of the time of Chaucer, and it is characteristic of the

continuity of English social, as well as political history that, although

waggons and coaches no longer come to or set out from the "George," its

spacious yard is now a railway receiving-office for goods, where the

railway vans, those descendants of the stage-waggon, thunderously come and

go all day.

It will be observed that the traffic in those days went to and from

Southwark, which was then the great business centre for the carriers. Not

yet was the Brighton road measured from Westminster Bridge, for the

adequate reason that there was no bridge at Westminster until 1749: only

the ferry from the Horseferry Road to Lambeth.

Widow Smith's waggon halted at Lewes, and it is not until ten years later

than the date of her advertisement that we hear of the Brighthelmstone

conveyance. The first was that announced by the pioneer, James Batchelor,

in _The Sussex Weekly Advertiser_, May 12th, 1756:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the LEWES ONE DAY STAGE COACH or CHAISE

sets out from the Talbot Inn, in the Borough, on Saturday next, the

19th instant.

When likewise the Brighthelmstone Stage begins.

Performed (_if God permit_) by

JAMES BATCHELOR.

The "Talbot" inn, which stood on the site of the ancient "Tabard," of

Chaucerian renown, disappeared from the Borough High Street in 1870. What

its picturesque yard was like in 1815, with the waggons of the Sussex

carriers, let the illustration tell.

Let us halt awhile, to admire the courage of those coaching and waggoning

pioneers who, in the days before "the sea-side" had been invented, and few

people travelled, dared the awful roads for what must then have been a

precarious business. Sussex roads in especial had a most unenviable name

for miriness, and wheeled traffic was so difficult that for many years

after this period the farmers and others continued to take their womenkind

about in the pillion fashion here caricatured by Henry Bunbury.

[Sidenote: SUSSEX ROADS]

Horace Walpole, indeed, travelling in Sussex in 1749, visiting Arundel and

Cowdray, acquired a too intimate acquaintance with their phenomenal depth

of mud and ruts, inasmuch as he--finicking little gentleman--was compelled

to alight precipitately from his overturned chaise, and to foot it like

any common fellow. One quite pities his daintiness in the narration of his

sorrows, picturesquely set forth by that accomplished letter-writer

arrived home to the safe seclusion of Strawberry Hill. He writes to George

Montagu, and dates August 26th, 1749:

"Mr. Chute and I returned from our expedition miraculously well,

considering all our distresses. If you love good roads, conveniences, good

inns, plenty of postilions and horses, be so kind as never to go into

Sussex. We thought ourselves in the northest part of England; the whole

county has a Saxon air, and the inhabitants are savage, as if King George

the Second was the first monarch of the East Angles. Coaches grow there no

more than balm and spices: we were forced to drop our post-chaise, that

resembled nothing so much as harlequin's calash, which was occasionally a

chaise or a baker's cart. We journeyed over alpine mountains" (Walpole,

you will observe, was, equally with the evening journalist of these happy

times, not unaccustomed to exaggerate) "drenched in clouds, and thought of

harlequin again, when he was driving the chariot of the sun through the

morning clouds, and was so glad to hear the _aqua vitae_ man crying a

dram.... I have set up my staff, and finished my pilgrimages for this

year. Sussex is a great damper of curiosity."

Thus he prattles on, delightfully describing the peculiarities of the

several places he visited with this Mr. Chute, "whom," says he, "I have

created _Strawberry King-at-Arms_." One wonders what that mute, inglorious

Chute thought of it all; if he was as disgusted with Sussex sloughs and

moist unpleasant "mountains" as his garrulous companion. Chute suffered in

silence, for the sight of pen, ink, and paper did not induce in _him_ a

fury of composition; and so we shall never know what he endured.

Then the pedantic Doctor John Burton, who journeyed into Sussex in 1751,

had no less unfortunate acquaintance with these miry ways than our

_dilettante_ of Strawberry Hill. To those who have small Latin and less

Greek, this traveller's tale must ever remain a sealed book; for it is in

those languages that he records his views upon ways and means, and men and

manners, in Sussex. As thus, for example:

"I fell immediately upon all that was most bad, upon a land desolate and

muddy, whether inhabited by men or beasts a stranger could not easily

distinguish, and upon roads which were, to explain concisely what is most

abominable, Sussexian. No one would imagine them to be intended for the

people and the public, but rather the byways of individuals, or, more

truly, the tracks of cattle-drivers; for everywhere the usual footmarks of

oxen appeared, and we too, who were on horseback, going along zigzag,

almost like oxen at plough, advanced as if we were turning back, while we

followed out all the twists of the roads.... My friend, I will set before

you a kind of problem in the manner of Aristotle:--Why comes it that the

oxen, the swine, the women, and all other animals(!) are so long-legged in

Sussex? Can it be from the difficulty of pulling the feet out of so much

mud by the strength of the ankle, so that the muscles become stretched, as

it were, and the bones lengthened?"

A doleful tale. Presently he arrives at the conclusion that the peasantry

"do not concern themselves with literature or philosophy, for they

consider the pursuit of such things to be only idling," which is not so

very remarkable a trait, after all, in the character of an agricultural

people.

[Illustration: THE "TALBOT" INN YARD. BOROUGH, ABOUT 1815. _From an old

drawing._]

Our author eventually, notwithstanding the terrible roads, arrived at

Brighthelmstone, by way of Lewes, "just as day was fading." It was, so he

says, "a village on the sea-coast; lying in a valley gradually sloping,

and yet deep. It is not, indeed, contemptible as to size, for it is

thronged with people, though the inhabitants are mostly very needy and

wretched in their mode of living, occupied in the employment of fishing,

robust in their bodies, laborious, and skilled in all nautical crafts,

and, as it is said, terrible cheats of the custom-house officers." As who,

indeed, is not, allowing the opportunity?

Batchelor, the pioneer of Brighton coaching, continued his enterprise in

1757, and with the coming of spring, and the drying of the roads, his

coaches, which had been laid up in the winter, after the usual custom of

those times, were plying again. In May he advertised, "for the convenience

of country gentlemen, etc.," his London, Lewes, and Brighthelmstone

stage-coach, which performed the journey of fifty-eight miles in two days;

and exclusive persons, who preferred to travel alone, might have

post-chaises of him.

[Sidenote: EARLY COACHING]

Brighthelmstone had in the meanwhile sprung into notice. The health-giving

qualities of its sea air, and the then "strange new eccentricity" of

sea-bathing, advocated from 1750 by Dr. Richard Russell, had already given

it something of a vogue among wealthy invalids, and the growing traffic

was worth competing for. Competitors therefore sprang up to share

Batchelor's business. Most of them merely added stage-coaches like his,

but in May, 1762, a certain "J. Tubb," in partnership with "S. Brawne,"

started a very superior conveyance, going from London one day and

returning from Brighthelmstone the next. This was the:

LEWES and BRIGHTELMSTONE new FLYING MACHINE (by Uckfield), hung on

steel springs, very neat and commodious, to carry FOUR PASSENGERS,

sets out from the Golden Cross Inn, Charing Cross, on Monday, the 7th

of June, at six o'clock in the morning, and will continue MONDAY'S,

WEDNESDAY'S, and FRIDAY'S to the White Hart, at Lewes, and the Castle,

at Brightelmstone, where regular Books are kept for entering

passenger's and parcels; will return to London TUESDAY'S, THURSDAY'S,

and SATURDAY'S Each Inside Passenger to Lewes, Thirteen Shillings; to

Brighthelmstone, Sixteen; to be allowed Fourteen Pound Weight for

Luggage, all above to pay One Penny per Pound; half the fare to be

paid at Booking, the other at entering the machine. Children in Lap

and Outside Passengers to pay half-price.

Performed by J. TUBB.

S. BRAWNE.

[Illustration: ME AND MY WIFE AND DAUGHTER. _From a caricature by Henry

Bunbury._]

Batchelor saw with dismay this coach performing the whole journey in one

day, while his took two. But he determined to be as good a man as his

opponent, if not even a better, and started the next week, at identical

fares, "a new large FLYING CHARIOT, with a Box and four horses (by

Chailey) to carry two Passengers only, except three should desire to go

together." The better to crush the presumptuous Tubb, he later on reduced

his fares. Then ensued a diverting, if by no means edifying, war of

advertisements; for Tubb, unwilling to be outdone, inserted the following

in _The Lewes Journal_, November, 1762:

THIS IS TO INFORM THE PUBLIC that, on Monday, the 1st of November

instant, the LEWES and BRIGHTHELMSTON FLYING MACHINE began going in

_one day_, and continues twice a week during the Winter Season to

Lewes only; sets out from the White Hart, at Lewes, MONDAYS and

THURSDAYS at Six o'clock in the Morning, and returns from the Golden

Cross, at Charing Cross, TUESDAYS and SATURDAYS, at the same hour.

Performed by J. TUBB.

N.B.--Gentlemen, Ladies, and others, are desired to look narrowly into

the Meanness and Design of the other Flying Machine to Lewes and

Brighthelmston, in lowering his prices, whether 'tis thro' conscience

or an endeavour to suppress me. If the former is the case, think how

you have been used for a great number of years, when he engrossed the

whole to himself, and kept you two days upon the road, going fifty

miles. If the latter, and he should be lucky enough to succeed in it,

judge whether he wont return to his old prices, when you cannot help

yourselves, and use you as formerly. As I have, then, been the remover

of this obstacle, which you have all granted by your great

encouragement to me hitherto, I, therefore, hope for the continuance

of your favours, which will entirely frustrate the deep-laid schemes

of my great opponent, and lay a lasting obligation on,--Your very

humble Servant,

J. TUBB.

To this replies Batchelor, possessed with an idea of vested interests

pertaining to himself:

WHEREAS, Mr. TUBB, by an Advertisement in this paper of Monday last,

has thought fit to cast some invidious Reflections upon me, in respect

of the lowering my Prices and being two days upon the Road, with other

low insinuations, I beg leave to submit the following matters to the

calm Consideration of the Gentlemen, Ladies, and other Passengers, of

what Degree soever, who have been pleased to favour me, viz.:

That our Family first set up the Stage Coach from London to Lewes, and

have continued it for a long Series of Years, from Father to Son and

other Branches of the same Race, and that even before the Turnpikes on

the Lewes Road were erected they drove their Stage, in the Summer

Season, in one day, and have continued to do ever since, and now in

the Winter Season twice in the week. And it is likewise to be

considered that many aged and infirm Persons, who did not chuse to

rise early in the Morning, were very desirous to be two Days on the

Road for their own Ease and Conveniency, therefore there was no

obstacle to be removed. And as to lowering my prices, let every one

judge whether, when an old Servant of the Country perceives an

Endeavour to suppress and supplant him in his Business, he is not well

justified in taking all measures in his Power for his own Security,

and even to oppose an unfair Adversary as far as he can. 'Tis,

therefore, hoped that the descendants of your very ancient Servants

will still meet with your farther Encouragement, and leave the Schemes

of our little Opponent to their proper Deserts.--I am, Your old and

present most obedient Servant,

J. BATCHELOR.

_December 13, 1762._

The rivals both kept to the road until the death of Batchelor, in 1766,

when his business was sold to Tubb, who took into partnership a Mr. Davis.

Together they started, in 1767, the first service of a daily coach in the

"Lewes and Brighthelmstone Flys," each carrying four passengers, one to

London and one to Brighton every day.

Tubb and Davis had in 1770 one "machine" and one waggon on this road, fare

by "machine" 14_s._ The machine ran daily to and from London, starting at

five o'clock in the morning. The waggon was three days on the road.

Another machine was also running, but with the coming of winter these

machines performed only three double journeys each a week.

In 1777 another stage-waggon was started by "Lashmar & Co." It loitered

between the "King's Head," Southwark, and the "King's Head," Brighton,

starting from London every Tuesday at the unearthly hour of 3 a.m., and

reaching its destination on Thursday afternoons.

On May 31st, 1784, Tubb and Davis put a "light post-coach" on the road,

running to Brighton one day returning to London the next, in addition to

their already running "machine" and "post-coach." This new conveyance

presumably made good time, four "insides" only being carried.

[Sidenote: GROWTH OF COACHING]

Four years later, when Brighton's sun of splendour was rising, there were

on the road between London and the sea three "machines," three light

post-coaches, two coaches, and two stage-waggons. Tubb now disappears, and

his firm becomes Davis & Co. Other proprietors were Ibberson & Co.,

Bradford & Co., and Mr. Wesson.

On May 1st, 1791, the first Brighton Mail coach was established. It was a

two-horse affair, running by Lewes and East Grinstead, and taking twelve

hours to perform the journey. It was not well supported by the public, and

as the Post Office would not pay the contractors a higher mileage, it was

at some uncertain period withdrawn.

About 1796 coach offices were opened in Brighton for the sole despatch of

coaching business, the time having passed away for the old custom of

starting from inns. Now, too, were different tales to tell of these roads,

after the Pavilion had been set in course of building. Royalty and the

Court could not endure to travel upon such evil tracks as had hitherto

been the lot of travellers to Brighthelmstone. Presently, instead of a

dearth of roads and a plethora of ruts, there became a choice of good

highways and a plenty of travellers upon them.

Numerous coaches ran to meet the demands of the travelling public, and

these continually increased in number and improved in speed. About this

time first appear the firms of Henwood, Crossweller, Cuddington, Pockney &

Harding, whose office was at No. 44, East Street: and Boulton, Tilt,

Hicks, Baulcomb & Co., at No. 1, North Street. The most remarkable thing,

to my mind, about those companies is their long-winded names. In addition

to the old service, there ran a "night post-coach" on alternate nights,

starting at 10 p.m. in the season. One then went to or from London

generally in "about" eleven hours, if all went well. If you could afford

only a ride in the stage-waggon, why then you were carried the distance by

the accelerated (!) waggons of this line in two days and one night.

IV

Erredge, the historian of Brighton, tells something of the social side of

Brighton Road coaching at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Social

indeed, as you shall see:

"In 1801 two pair-horse coaches ran between London and Brighton on

alternate days, one up, the other down, driven by Messrs. Crossweller and

Hine. The progress of these coaches was amusing. The one from London left

the Blossoms Inn, Lawrence Lane, at 7 a.m., the passengers breaking their

fast at the Cock, Sutton, at 9. The next stoppage for the purpose of

refreshment was at the Tangier, Banstead Downs--a rural little spot,

famous for its elderberry wine, which used to be brought from the cottage

'roking hot,' and on a cold wintry morning few refused to partake of it.

George IV. invariably stopped here and took a glass from the hand of Miss

Jeal as he sat in his carriage. The important business of luncheon took

place at Reigate, where sufficient time was allowed the passengers to view

the Baron's Cave, where, it is said, the barons assembled the night

previous to their meeting King John at Runymeade. The grand halt for

dinner was made at Staplefield Common, celebrated for its famous black

cherry-trees, under the branches of which, when the fruit was ripe, the

coaches were allowed to draw up and the passengers to partake of its

tempting produce. The hostess of the hostelry here was famed for her

rabbit-puddings, which, hot, were always waiting the arrival of the coach,

and to which the travellers never failed to do such ample justice, that

ordinarily they found it quite impossible to leave at the hour appointed;

so grogs, pipes, and ale were ordered in, and, to use the language of the

fraternity, 'not a wheel wagged' for two hours. Handcross was a little

resting-place, celebrated for its 'neat' liquors, the landlord of the inn

standing, bottle in hand, at the door. He and several other bonifaces at

Friars' Oak, etc., had the reputation of being on pretty good terms with

the smugglers who carried on their operations with such audacity along the

Sussex coast.

"After walking up Clayton Hill, a cup of tea was sometimes found to be

necessary at Patcham, after which Brighton was safely reached at 7 p.m. It

must be understood that it was the custom for the passengers to walk up

all the hills, and even sometimes in heavy weather to give a push behind

to assist the jaded horses."

[Sidenote: COMPETITION]

But it was not always so ideal or so idyllic. That there were discomforts

and accidents is evident from the wordy warfare of advertisements that

followed upon the starting of the Royal Brighton Four Horse Company in

1802. As a competitor with older firms, it seems to have aroused much

jealousy and slander, if we may believe the following contemporary

advertisement:

THE ROYAL BRIGHTON Four Horse Coach Company beg leave to return their

sincere thanks to their Friends and the Public in general for the very

liberal support they have experienced since the starting of their

Coaches, and assure them it will always be their greatest study to

have their Coaches safe, with good Horses and sober careful Coachmen.

They likewise wish to rectify a report in circulation of their Coach

having been overturned on Monday last, by which a gentleman's leg was

broken, &c., no such thing having ever happened to either of their

Coaches. The Fact is it was one of the BLUE COACHES instead of the

Royal New Coach.

As several mistakes have happened, of their friends being BOOKED at

other Coach offices, they are requested to book themselves at the

ROYAL NEW COACH OFFICE, CATHERINE'S HEAD, 47, East Street.

The coaching business grew rapidly, and in an advertisement offering for

sale a portion of the coaching business at No. 1, North Street, it was

stated that the annual returns of this firm were more than L12,000 per

annum, yielding from Christmas, 1794, to Christmas, 1808, seven and a

half per cent. on the capital invested, besides purchasing the interest of

four of the partners in the concern. In this last year two new businesses

were started, those of Waldegrave & Co., and Pattenden & Co. Fares now

ruled high--23_s._ inside; 13_s._ outside.

The Brighton Road: The Classic Highway to the South · 第 1 / 16 段