CHAPTER XXVI

SOME MODERN THEORIES OF SLEEP

I have an exposition of sleep come upon me.

SHAKESPEARE.

There have been almost as many theories of sleep and its causes as

there have been investigators, but these theories may be grouped under

a few main heads:

Physiological, or that which has to do with some bodily conditions

only, and which made men think that sleep was dependent upon the

circulation of the blood or upon decreased consumption of oxygen, was

an early one of these theories. It has had many advocates and has led

to many interesting experiments that have increased the sum of general

knowledge, although they have not explained sleep.

Delicate instruments, with formidable names, have been invented

and successfully used to measure the intensity of sleep and to

note its phenomena. Two of the experimenters—C. E. Brush, Jr., and

R. Fayerweather of the Physiological Laboratory of Johns Hopkins

University—through long, intricate and exhaustive experiments, have

found that sleep is most intense and the pressure of blood in the

arteries lowest during the first half of the sleeping period. After we

have completed the first half of our sleep, the intensity or soundness

of sleep becomes less, and the pressure of blood in the arteries

continues to increase up to the moment of awaking.

It is interesting to learn that the moment when we are most soundly

sleeping is at the end of the first hour of sleep, and that the

blood-pressure has at that time reached its very lowest point. Messrs.

Brush and Fayerweather report that, during the first few hours of

sleep, the blood-pressure continues to fall and then begins a gradual

rise. The tendency is to more and more rapid flow of the blood, but

this rise is not steady or regular, because it is broken by long waves

when the force of the circulation falls and the pulse is weaker than it

was a moment or two before. The rapidity of the blood-flow is greater

on the moment of awakening than just before dropping to sleep. This

increase is not sudden, but is the culmination of the rise that begins

a few hours after we fall asleep. (See Appendix B.)

The intensity or depth of sleep is shown by a curve that looks like a

pile of sand with the top scooped off. It increases rather slowly, in

most cases, for the first quarter-hour: then quickly, so that half an

hour later the person is most “sound asleep.” He stays so, on the

level top, for about half an hour. That is the time that wise burglars

and late husbands choose to steal into the house, about an hour after

everyone is asleep. After that time the sleeper reverses the process of

falling into deep sleep by getting nearer to waking for half an hour

and then getting, at first rapidly, nearer to waking for two or three

hours. In the last three or four hours healthy and normal persons reach

about the same proportions of time and intensity of sleep, so that the

Indian-bow-shaped curve fairly represents how long it takes everybody

to deepen his sleep. Kohlschütter found how great an intensity of sound

was needed to awaken a sleeper at different periods throughout the

night. His curve thus made tallies very exactly with that of Brush and

Fayerweather, obtained in quite a different way.

Some other investigators have pointed out that, interesting as

this theory is, it proves one thing about as completely as it does

the other. For, while it is plain that sleep and the great fall in

blood-pressure exist at the same moment, it is not conclusively shown

which is cause and which is effect. Does sleep cause the fall in

blood-pressure, or does the fall in blood-pressure cause sleep? The two

are coexistent, but who can say which begins first?

It looks as if sleep might be more justly considered the cause, if

one takes the sleeping-position, and maintains the attitude of mind

suitable to induce sleep, blood-pressure grows less, even though the

patient does not actually fall asleep.

Under this physiological view must come also the chemical theory based

on the fact that we consume more oxygen during the day, thus forming

carbon dioxide and other poisons which cause sleepiness. During the

night we absorb oxygen, building up the tissues, and eliminating the

poisons of the waking hours.

The poisons which are the result of the consumption of oxygen cause

fatigue, and according to Preyer, a European authority, “sleep is the

direct consequence of fatigue, or rather of the fatigue products in

the blood.” His contention is that, if lactic acid and other chemical

products of the consumption of oxygen in the body were injected

artificially, sleep would follow. Experiments in this direction made by

Preyer, Fisher, and L. Meyer have yielded such contradictory results

that the theory is not proved thereby.

The idea that sleep is the result of poisons in the system takes us

into the pathological theory of sleep, which regards it as a sort of

disease like epilepsy or auto-intoxication. We produce by our own

activities the poisons which cause insensibility until the system

cleanses itself. Professor Leo Errera of Brussels says that “work in

the organism is closely bound up with a chemical breaking down.” Among

the products of this breakdown are “leucomaines,” the scientific

name for poisons formed in living tissue, and just the opposite to

“ptomaines,” which, however, are also virulent poisons.

Professor Errera tells us that, during our waking hours, we produce

more leucomaines than the oxygen we absorb can destroy. This excess is

carried along by the blood and held by the brain centers, and in time

produces sleep, just as any poisonous anæsthetic, such as morphine,

would produce sleep.

While we are sleeping we absorb much oxygen and we recover from the

effects of our self-intoxication. Errera maintains that work, fatigue,

sleep, and repair are not merely successive events, but phenomena

chained together in a regular and necessary cycle. He explains

sleeplessness due to overfatigue on the theory that small doses of

poisons induce sleep and large doses induce excitement and even

convulsions.

Manacéïne points out that this theory is good from a purely physical

standpoint, but does not explain our power to postpone sleep or the

faculty of waking at a fixed hour. We can do both, and any adequate

theory of sleep must explain why we can control the tendency to sleep,

but cannot control the symptoms of ordinary poisoning.

The psychology of sleep · 第 26 / 54 章