ALECK. A. INGLIS.

_Edinburgh, January 30, 1872._

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Miscellanea.

TRADE IN OBSCENE PHOTOGRAPHS.—A man named Benjamin Smith, _alias_ Martin

Stanley, living at Oil Mill Folds, or Alma-place, Westgate, Rotherham,

was charged at Rotherham, on Thursday, the 25th ult., with publishing

and selling photographs of a kind to debase and scandalise human nature.

The West Riding constabulary received information from various sources

that photographs of a most disgusting character were being circulated

throughout the United Kingdom, and even in other countries, by a man

living at Rotherham, who had inserted an advertisement in several London

and provincial papers, in the name of Smith and Stanley, stating that he

was prepared on receipt of postage stamps to forward portraits of French

girls of a highly novel and exciting nature. A trap to catch the

prisoner was accordingly laid by the Rotherham police, an inspector

sending to him letters signed with an assumed name, and purporting to

come from a place some distance from Rotherham. Stamps were enclosed,

and in return a number of photographs of a most filthy and disgusting

nature were obtained. At length some postage stamps, bearing a private

mark, were sent in a letter to the prisoner, and the inspector of police

watched the postman deliver it. He then entered the house, and found his

own letter containing the marked stamps, together with a number of other

letters, in possession of the prisoner. On the house being searched

another beastly photograph was found, whereupon the prisoner told the

officer that he would find no more there, as he kept them at a house he

mentioned at Sheffield. This house was accordingly searched by two

officers of the Sheffield police force, and there they found a number of

most filthy photographs, together with printed lists describing what the

prisoner had for sale. The prisoner was apprehended on the 14th of

January, and since that time nearly a hundred letters from all parts of

England, Scotland, and Ireland have arrived at the Rotherham post office

directed to him. The police obtained the permission of Her Majesty’s

Secretary of State and of the Postmaster-General to receive and open

these letters, and they found, on doing so, that great numbers of

postage stamps were enclosed, and some filthy photographs and books. The

prisoner was committed for trial, and on application being made the

magistrates intimated that they should require the prisoner to be bound

in the sum of £200, and two sureties of £100 each to be found.

CAMPHOR IN THE PRINTING BATH.—Mr. John R. Clemons gives in _Mosaics_

some of his experience with camphor in the printing press. He

says:—After the positive printing bath has been used some time it

becomes more or less charged with albumen. If, when the solution is

poured from the dish into the filter, frothy bubbles appear on the

surface, it is in the condition named, and is unfit for use in

sensitising albumen paper. The reason is obvious. When an albumen sheet

is floated upon a silver solution thus charged with albumen, a secondary

film of albumen, or albumenate of silver, is imparted to it, which

deprives it of its lustre, and it is impossible to secure a good tone

upon it. The difference will be readily seen by floating one-half of a

sheet of paper on the used solution, and the other half on a fresh

solution, and comparing the results. The effect of silvering on such a

solution is similar to that of using doubly-albumenised paper. In both

cases the silver will penetrate both films, even if silvered on the

back, and very good prints apparently may be made on paper so treated;

but when you proceed to tone them, you will find that the double film of

albumen resists the action of the gold, and renders it impossible to get

rich tones. I have already recommended the addition of alcohol to a bath

thus charged with albumen, and then burning it out, in order to cleanse

the bath, but since have sought for a less expensive method, and have

found camphor to be just what is needed. Besides being less expensive,

it is also more expeditious; for in five minutes an eighty-ounce bath

can be cleansed of all impurities by its use, as directed below. Make a

saturated solution of camphor, viz.:—

Camphor 1 ounce.

Alcohol 6 ounces.

To cleanse a bath which is considerably fouled by the albumen, add two

and a-half ounces of this camphor solution. A greasy appearance will be

presented on the surface of the bath. Shake well, when the greasiness

will disappear. Then filter, never using the same filter twice. If,

after filtration, the solution turns dark, add a couple of drops of

permanganate of potash, and it will immediately clear. This turning dark

is owing to long usage of the silver solution. It is a fact that the

bath is daily impregnated more or less with the albumen, therefore a

slight addition of camphor daily is recommended. This will avoid the

addition of the permanganate, which rather decreases the sensitiveness.

As a quick and ready corrective agent, camphor will be found of great

advantage. It will impart a camphory smell to the solution, but in no

way deteriorates the quality of the prints.

TO COPY OIL PORTRAITS.—Mr. B. Frank Saylor, in _Photographic Mosaics_,

says on this subject:—As I have never seen anything from which I have

derived any material aid in the copying of oil portraits, and especially

old ones, I propose simply to give our _modus operandi_, feeling

confident that those who do not proceed in like manner may successfully

copy oil paintings, and especially old portraits. We first, with a clean

sponge and water, partially wash the old portrait, and then pour perhaps

an ounce of glycerine on it, and with the same sponge brush the

glycerine crosswise over the entire picture until it presents a uniform

surface; or, should a greasy appearance be presented, something like a

negative plate when partially coated, rub gently with the palm of the

hand crosswise, and it is ready for copying. We copy under the skylight,

about where we should place the sitter for the same lighted picture,

directing the camera to about the centre of the picture, and as nearly

level as may be. On our camera we use a quarter-size tube inverted—that

is, turn it end for end—with a diaphragm of about six-eighths of an inch

aperture, placing the picture square to the front of the camera. After

making the necessary adjustments as to size, &c., we coat the plate with

the same collodion which we use for our regular portrait negatives, and

when it is properly coated expose fully—that is, neither over- nor

under-expose. The success, however, depends on the manipulation _during

the exposure_. We take a piece of backboard, say six inches wide and

about three feet long, and with it shade all the top of the portrait

above the head, standing by the side of the portrait and holding the

backboard in the hand, moving it up and down as though it were hinged on

the top of the portrait, but not allowing its shadow to come down over

the forehead or face, except those parts should be improved thereby. We

produce the same effect on the sides of the portrait by occasionally

moving our body at the same time over portions of the background, taking

care not to remain perfectly still or too long in the same place, nor

yet to allow any shadow from our person or anything else to cover any

portion of the figure. Thus, with a little care and attention, a very

satisfactory background is obtained, even admitting of desirable

variation, thereby avoiding the necessity of a double-printed background

and the like, and producing from a single negative and printing

duplicates to equal, if not to surpass, the original, and every print

alike. Lastly: we develope with the usual iron developer, using six

ounces of iron to sixty-four of water; this, however, we again dilute

with water, adding alcohol, more or less acetic acid, according to the

detail and density we wish to obtain.

-------

_Now Ready, Crown 8vo., Price 1s.; Free by Post, 1s. 2d._

THE BRITISH JOURNAL PHOTOGRAPHIC ALMANAC AND PHOTOGRAPHER’S DAILY

COMPANION FOR 1872. Edited by J. T. TAYLOR.—The volume embraces every

subject that can be of any use to the Amateur and Professional

Photographer. The Editor has been assisted by numerous _collaborateurs_,

embracing nearly all the leading writers connected with the Art-Science

of Photography. Some idea may be formed of the large body of interesting

and important information brought together within the compass of this

Volume from the fact that upwards of Sixty practical workers in

Photography have contributed original articles to this issue of THE

BRITISH JOURNAL PHOTOGRAPHIC ALMANAC.

London: HENRY GREENWOOD, publisher, 2, York-street, Covent-garden, W.C.

The British Journal of Photography, No. 613, Vol. XIX, February 2, 1872 · 第 21 / 33 题