GEO. SPENCER.

_77, Cannon-street, E.C., January 26, 1872._

AMMONIA FUMING.

_To the_ EDITORS.

GENTLEMEN,—In your useful little ALMANAC for the present year there is

an article by Mr. A. L. Henderson, enthusiastically written, in favour

of fuming.

Now, in accordance with his recommendation, I have tried the said

fuming; but my first essay has certainly not impressed me very strongly

as regards its favourable results—whether from my own defective

manipulation or not I cannot say.

I found that the paper—especially some of Marion’s thick Saxe—assumed a

most disagreeable yellow colour after fuming, and it maintained that

colour through all subsequent operations—as a matter of course, spoiling

the prints. Another sample of (Rive) paper procured from another dealer

was not quite so faulty in this respect; still, in neither case was the

brilliancy of the prints enhanced—rather deteriorated, I

thought—although Mr. Henderson maintains so stoutly the advantages of

fuming in this respect. Again: instead of the toning being quicker and

more regular in action, as Mr. Henderson states, I found it much the

reverse.

I think that I must be wrong somewhere in my working, and I wish to ask

your opinion or Mr. Henderson’s on the best mode of proceeding—assuming

it to be really worth while to adopt fuming. I used an oblong box about

two feet in length by one foot in breadth, placing at the bottom a

narrow-necked bottle containing about two ounces of liquor ammonia,

fuming two quarter-sheets of paper for about ten minutes, with the

result above stated.

Have I omitted any necessary addition? or have I proceeded wrongly?—I

am, yours, &c.,

The British Journal of Photography, No. 613, Vol. XIX, February 2, 1872 · 第 19 / 33 题