THOMAS SUTTON, B.A.

_Redon, January 26, 1872._

THE RECENT SOLAR ECLIPSE.—NEW PHOTOGRAPHIC VENTURE AT THE

ANTIPODES.—PHOTOGRAPHY IN THE BUSH.

The most interesting event, in a photographic point of view, which I

have to report is the departure of the scientific expedition to observe

the total eclipse of the sun on the 12th of this month. The place

selected for the observations is Cape Sidmouth, some three hundred miles

south of Cape York, in Northern Australia.

The expedition has been organised by the Royal Society of Victoria, and

the expense is met by private subscriptions, largely aided by grants

from the several Colonial Governments. The Queensland Government steamer

was also placed at the disposal of the party free of charge.

The various instruments necessary for the observations were sent from

England by the Royal Society; but, owing to my absence from Sydney at

the time the expedition sailed, I am unable to give any details of the

arrangements for taking photographs of the eclipse. I hope, however,

soon to be able to give a full description of the results.

The party consists of more than thirty gentlemen, the different branches

of science being well represented; for botanists and geologists are

taking advantage of the trip to make investigations in their own

departments. For the astronomical observations Victoria sends her

Government Astronomer, Mr. Ellery, at the head of a large staff of

observers, and a photographer, Mr. Walters; while New South Wales sends

Mr. Russell, the present, and the Rev. W. Scott, the late, Government

Astronomer, and Mr. Merlin, of the “American and Australasian

Photographic Company.” From this double staff we may expect a large

number of photographs and other valuable results.

The steamer left Sydney on the 27th of November, and will return by

Christmas, before which time no news will reach us of the doings of the

party. We shall, therefore, look forward to their return with much

interest.

* * * * *

Professional photographers here do not now devote their attention so

exclusively to portraiture as formerly. The “American and Australasian

Photographic Company” has announced its intention of photographing every

house in the Australasian colonies! I suppose it finds it a profitable

speculation, as it has already photographed a considerable number of

towns, house by house. The day for each place is previously advertised,

so that the inhabitants may put themselves and their dwellings in

holiday attire. The photographs are to some extent used as

advertisements.

* * * * *

I lately came across a photographer in the far interior, some 500 or 600

miles from Sydney. He had already travelled a still greater distance

from Adelaide, in South Australia, from whence he had started on his

tour. He was plying his vocation at the various sheep and cattle

stations, and was apparently well patronised. I saw several of his

groups of aboriginals, which were very good. The black fellows were

highly delighted with their portraits, and were very anxious that copies

should be sent to their friends in other districts.

_Sydney, December 1, 1871._ E. B. DOCKER, M.A.

P.S.—The unfortunate wreck of the mail steamer has deprived us of the

journals for this month.—E. B. D.

CARBOLIC ACID.

_To the_ EDITORS.

GENTLEMEN,—My attention has been called to an article in your issue of

the 19th January, under the head “Correspondence,” by Mr. Thomas Sutton,

containing several statements with reference to carbolic acid which it

would be wrong to allow to remain uncontradicted.

First: he says carbolic acid is by no means a good antiseptic, and is

very poisonous, and then refers to persons being lately poisoned by its

_fumes_ at Wolverhampton.

As to its poisonous nature: It is, of course, a poison if taken

internally in quantity, but is not a virulent one taken in any

reasonable or probable quantity. It is, perhaps, not out of place to say

that if it should be taken internally in a concentrated form, by

misadventure, large doses of castor and sweet oil immediately

administered will materially counteract the poisonous effect of the

acid. The fumes of the acid are perfectly harmless and may be breathed

with impunity.

Mr. Sutton is labouring under a false impression with regard to the case

to which he alludes at Wolverhampton, of which the following is the

correct account:—Two dogs (not human beings) were _supposed_ to have

died from inhaling the fumes of carbolic acid emanating from a

disinfecting powder sprinkled over the floor of a workshop in

Wolverhampton, and, the following is an extract from the report of the

chemist who examined one of the dogs:—“The disinfecting powder was not a

carbolic acid powder, but an imitation; for it contained nothing but

lime impregnated with tar, and was entirely innocent of any harm to the

animals. Strychnine, however, was discovered in considerable quantity in

most parts of the viscera and in the blood. I calculated that at least

one grain and a-quarter of this poisonous alkaloid had been administered

to the animal by some evil-disposed person or persons unknown.” Thus

much for the poisoning of human beings lately at Wolverhampton by the

fumes of carbolic acid.[4]

Footnote 4:

The cattle show at the Agricultural Hall, Islington, has for the two

last years been successfully disinfected and kept sweet with carbolic

acid.

Had Mr. Sutton ever seen carbolic acid fumigation, or read about

carbolic acid, he would not have made an assertion so utterly

groundless. The writer has himself many times been for two or three

days together in a room containing a large excess of carbolic acid

fumes without experiencing any injurious effects.

With regard to the action of carbolic acid on the teeth, if Mr. Sutton

will refer to an article in the _British Journal of Dental Science_

for March, 1871, he will find “it is a powerful antiseptic, and

invaluable for the arrest of any decay or decomposition of the teeth.”

Mr. Sutton has quoted from a long letter of Dr. Dougall’s to the

_Lancet_, and I cannot do better than refer him to Dr. Sansom’s able

reply to it in the _Lancet_ of January 13th. Dr. Sansom says that the

white-cloud appearance in albuminous solutions to which carbolic acid

has been added is often really no albuminous precipitate at all, but

is caused by refractile globules of carbolic acid in a fine state of

sub-division; also, that it has been shown that albuminous solutions

are antisepted when carbolic acid exists in them in too feeble a

proportion to cause any precipitate whatever. If carbolic acid acted

as an antiseptic by coagulating albumen, agents which had a greater

coagulating power would, _a fortiori_, be more powerful antiseptics,

which has abundantly been proved not to be the case, and therefore the

antiseptic properties of carbolic acid do not result solely from its

power of coagulating albumen.

With respect to the assertion that the amount of carbolic acid vapour

which could be tolerated in the air of a hospital ward would be

entirely inadequate to act as a disinfectant, Dr. Sansom says his

experiments have shown him that _carbolised atmospheres_ are efficient

in preventing putrefaction and the growth of mouldiness, and more so

than atmospheres impregnated with chloride of lime or sulphurous acid.

Dr. Sansom objects to the experiments recorded by Dr. Dougall, since

tar oil (a crude product weak in carbolic acid, and possessing little

or no volatile disinfectant constituent), and McDougall’s powder (a

mixture of sulphites of lime and magnesia with tar oil) were used.

As to carbolic acid not being a good antiseptic, the following

reports, I think, fully prove the contrary:—

The late Dr. W. Allen Miller, F.R.S., preserved urine and fresh blood

for three months by the simple addition of five per cent. of Calvert’s

carbolic disinfecting powder—a product containing fifteen per cent. of

carbolic acid in a free state.

Mr. Wm. Crookes, F.R.S., says that he took some albumen from fresh

eggs and mixed it with an equal bulk of water. By itself it became bad

after nine days, and at the end of three weeks it smelt very strongly.

He added to four bottles of the fluid respectively 1, 2½, 5, and 10

per cent. of carbolic acid powder (equivalent to 3/20, ⅜, ¾, and 1½

per cent. of free carbolic acid). All kept good at ordinary

temperatures for forty days. Blood with 1/15 per cent. of carbolic

acid remained good for a month. Solutions of size, glue, and gum mixed

with 1/15 per cent. of carbolic acid have remained for two months

without becoming sour. Fresh yeast was washed with water containing

one-tenth per cent. Its power of inducing fermentation was entirely

destroyed.

Dr. F. Crace Calvert, F.R.S., in his paper on comparative

disinfectants, gives the following results with antiseptics upon

solutions of albumen:—

Antiseptic Percentage Time in which

employed. of acquired an

antiseptic offensive odour.

used. Temperature 70° to

80° F.

Chloride of 5 16 days.

lime

Tar oil 2 11 days.

Carbolic acid 2 remained sound six

months

None — 5 days.

The writer preserved meat for ninety days, during a hot summer, by

placing twelve ounces of fresh meat in a bottle containing one pound

of water and five grains of carbolic acid. The mouth of the bottle was

left open, and no offensive smell was emitted till the ninety-third

day. The meat was, of course, unfit for food, and was merely

experimented with to test the antiseptic power of carbolic acid.

The following is an extract from a report in _Compte Rendus de

l’Académie des Sciences_ of March 6th, 1871, by Messrs. Nelaton,

Langier, and Payen, on experiments made at the Paris Morgue by M.

Devergie:—

“During the heat of summer, when putrefying corpses in the

Morgue continually emit a quantity of noxious gases that cannot

be removed by ventilation or destroyed by chlorine or bleaching

powder, we decided to prevent their production by trying to

destroy the vitality of the germs of putrefaction, and thus

prevent decomposition itself. We effected this by dissolving one

litre of carbolic acid in 1,900 litres of water and irrigating

the bodies with the solution thus made. Putrefaction was

completely stopped, and disinfection was even obtained after

reducing the quantity of acid by one-half. M. Devergie points

out that water containing one four-thousandth part of carbolic

acid proved sufficient during the intense heat of last summer to

disinfect the deadhouse, without the aid of any shaft, when six

or seven dead bodies were lying there. * * * * * * * * * * *

Carbolic acid seems well adapted for the disinfection of rooms

which have been occupied by persons suffering from infectious

diseases; therefore, we recommend its use, after being dissolved

in thirty times its weight of water, by sprinkling it on the

floors, pavements, and staircases during the stay of patients in

rooms and for a few days after their departure.”

According to Dr. Sansom carbolic acid is readily taken up by air, so

that 159.44 cubic inches of air, at 60° Fah., contain one grain of

carbolic acid. Air thus _carbolised_ (currents excluded) entirely annuls

putrefaction and fungoid manifestation on the surface of putrescible

fluids, and such carbolised air is more permanently efficacious than air

charged with the fumes of chloride of lime or sulphurous acid, and it

may be breathed with impunity by mammifers.

These few observations will, I think, satisfy your readers that Mr.

Sutton’s remarks are erroneous and without foundation. I shall be glad

to learn that photographers have tried carbolic acid in the preservative

solution for dry plates, and would recommend them to make a solution of

carbolic acid, one part to one thousand parts of water, and then add

their albumen to this solution to the strength they require it. Above

all things it is essential that the carbolic acid be of good quality for

photographic purposes; and I would recommend them to use an acid such as

Calvert’s No. 1 (gilt label) carbolic acid.—I am, yours, &c.,

The British Journal of Photography, No. 613, Vol. XIX, February 2, 1872 · 第 13 / 33 题