DEAR TOBY,

The address from which I write to you is familiar in the public ear in

connection with a long series which, such is the ignorance of mankind, I

have heard described as petulant, querulous, self-adulatory notes. I

have often wondered that it has not occurred to any one to notice the

singular appropriateness of the name of my humble home. It is not for

me, at my time of life, to claim anything like prescience of affairs. I

may have been right in my views of the succeeding events of the past

half-century, or I may have been wrong. I will just mention that my

friend, T-NN-S-N, who has a pretty faculty for poetry, once summed me up

in a couplet which I venture to think is not without its charm. "J-HN

BR-GHT," he wrote--

J-HN BR-GHT

Is always right.

He told me in confidence that he had at one time contemplated a

eulogistic poem of some seventy or eighty lines, price to the

_Nineteenth Century_ a guinea each. But, having thrown off this couplet,

it appeared in itself so sufficient, so comprehensive yet so precise,

that amplification would have rather reduced than increased its value.

Therefore it remains a brilliant fragment.

But I am wandering from the theme, which, in the present instance, is

not myself but my country address. What I thought might be interesting

to point out is the curious felicity of the nomenclature, and the

remarkable foresight of which it is proof. More than a generation ago it

received this singular appellation. At that time nothing seemed more

remote from ordinary apprehension than that in this year I should be

what we call "a Unionist," an ally and supporter of Lord S-L-B-RY,

pulling in the same boat as the H-M-LT-NS, and marching shoulder to

shoulder with ASHM-D B-RTL-TT. In those days I was wont to pour forth

torrents of angry contempt upon the Conservative party. D-SR-LI was my

wash-pot, over the Markiss I cast out my shoe; but even then my address

was One Ash, Rochdale. Do you begin to see what I mean? One Empire, One

Parliament, One Ash! Some of my old colleagues and disciples among the

Radicals scoff at me because of my new companions. But, as usual, I have

been right from the first. _I_ have always been what the _Marchioness_

called a "wonner." What has happened is that the Liberal Party and my

old companions have moved away from me, whilst the Conservatives have

moved towards me. I am the same to-day as yesterday, or as these fifty

years past. "J-HN BR-GHT, always right," and any change of relationship

or appearance is due to the ineradicable error and fatal foolishness of

others.

What I feel, dear TOBY, in reviewing a long and honourable life, is the

terrible feeling of monotony. I sometimes find myself envying ordinary

men like GL-DST-NE, who, looking back over their past life, can put

their hand down and say, "There I blundered, there I was misled by

circumstances." For a long time GL-DST-NE kept pretty straight--that is

to say I agreed with him. But he has gone wrong lamentably on this Irish

Question, and all the righteous acts of his life--that is to say, steps

in which he has chanced to walk in time with me--are obliterated. It is

true that, at one time, it was I who was the foremost Apostle of Irish

National feeling. At this date people with inconvenient memories are

constantly raking up passages in my speeches about Ireland, and the

English yoke which, except that they are too finely cut, and of too

noble a style of eloquence, would exactly suit GL-DST-NE to-day. I said

these things then, it is true, and then they were right. I do not say

them to-day, and therefore they are wrong. _Quod erat demonstrandum._

(You will observe that since, with a distinguished friend, I have joined

the political company of gentlemen, I have forsaken my old habit of

keeping to the Saxon tongue, and sometimes, as here, I drop into Latin.

Occasionally I fall into French. _Autres temps, autres moeurs._)

My nearest approach to human frailty, is, perhaps, to be found in a

certain measure of absence of suavity. It is perhaps possible that my

temper was,--I will not say soured, but--not sweetened by the vile

attacks made upon me personally by Irish Members in Parliament during

the last ten years. You remember what B-NT-NCK said about me? I don't

mean Big Ben, or Little Ben, but Lord GEORGE B-NT-NCK. "If BR-GHT," he

said, "had not been a Quaker, he would have been a prize-fighter." I

think there is about the remark some suspicion of lack of respect. But,

also, it is not without some foundation of truth. I admit an impulse to

strike back when I am hit; sometimes when I am not. Through two

Parliaments the ragged regiment that live upon the contributions of

their poor relations in domestic service in the United States have

girded at me in the House of Commons. This was my reward for the

rhetorical services I did for Ireland a quarter of a century ago. They

pummelled me, kicked me, dragged my honoured name in the dust, and spat

upon me in the market-place. That gross ingratitude I could never

forgive, and if in reprisal, the cause I once advocated suffers, can I

be held blameable?

But this seems to be running into the groove of apology, and I never

apologised to anyone for anything in my life. For fear I should begin

now, I will close this letter, remaining, Your friend, J-HN BR-GHT.

P.S.--I observe that in my haste I have not called you a fool, or

directly stigmatised as such anyone alluded to in this letter. I am

afraid this will be regarded as a sign of growing weakness. But I will

bring up the average in the next letter I write for publication.

* * * * *

[Illustration: DARWINIAN ANCESTOR

_Composing the Song, "For O it is such a Norrible Tail!!"_

"Our ancestor was an animal which breathed water, had a

swim-bladder, a great swimming tail, and an imperfect

skull."--_Darwin to Lyell._]

[Illustration: THE BABES IN THE CHRISTMAS WOOD. "The Cry is still they

come!"]

* * * * *

[Illustration: PUTTING _HIS_ FOOT IN IT.

_She._ "AND DO YOU STILL SQUEEZE UP THE LADIES' FEET IN YOUR COUNTRY?"

_He._ "ON THE CONTRARY, MADAM! THAT IS A _CHINESE_ CUSTOM. WE IN JAPAN

ALWAYS ALLOW THE LADIES' FEET TO GROW TO QUITE THEIR FULL SIZE. NOT THAT

ANY WOULD EVER RIVAL _YOURS_, MADAM!"

[_Is delighted with his neat little Compliment!_]

* * * * *

Punch or the London Charivari, Vol. 93, December 10, 1887 · 第 7 / 32 题