2. As to what is said concerning the historical parts of scripture, that

it is not necessary for them to have been transmitted to us by divine

inspiration, it may be replied, that these, as well as other parts

thereof, _were written for our learning_, Rom. xv. 4. so that what is

excellent in the character of persons, is designed for our imitation;

their blemishes and defects, to humble us under a sense of the universal

corruption of human nature; and the evil consequences thereof, to awaken

our fears, and dehort us from exposing ourselves to the same judgments

which were inflicted as the punishment of sin: and the account we have

of the providential dealing of God with his church, in the various ages

thereof, is of use to put us upon admiring and adoring the divine

perfections, as much as the doctrinal parts of scripture; and therefore

it is necessary that we have the greatest certainty that the inspired

writers have given us a true narration of things, and consequently that

the words, as well as the matter, are truly divine.

3. When, that they may a little palliate the matter, they allow that the

inspired writers, though left to the weakness of their memory, and the

impropriety of their style, were, notwithstanding, preserved, by the

interposure of divine providence, from committing mistakes in matters of

the highest importance; it may be replied, That it will be very

difficult for them to assign what doctrines are of greater, and what of

less importance, in all the instances thereof, or wherein providence has

interposed, to prevent their running into mistakes, and when it has not;

so that we are still in an uncertainty what doctrines are delivered to

us, as they were received by inspiration, and what are misrepresented by

the penmen of scripture; and we shall be ready to conclude, that in

every section or paragraph thereof, some things may be true, and others

false; some doctrines divine and others human, while we are left without

any certain rule to distinguish one from the other, and accordingly we

cannot be sure that any part of it is the word of God; so that such a

revelation as this would be of no real service to the church, and our

faith would be founded in the wisdom, or rather weakness of men, and our

religion, depending on it, could not be truly divine; so that this

method of reasoning is, to use the word inspiration, but to destroy all

the valuable ends thereof.

VI. Another argument, to prove the scriptures to be the word of God, may

be taken from their antiquity and wonderful preservation for so many

ages; this appears more remarkable, if we consider,

1. That many other writings, of much later date, have been lost, and

nothing more is known of them, but that there were once such books in

the world; and books might more easily be lost, when there were no other

but written copies of them, and these procured with much expense and

difficulty, and consequently their number proportionably small.

2. That the scripture should be preserved, notwithstanding all the

malice of its avowed enemies, as prompted hereunto by Satan, whose

kingdom is overthrown by it. Had it been in his power, he would

certainly have utterly abolished and destroyed it; but yet it has been

preserved unto this day, which discovers a wonderful hand of providence;

and would God so remarkably have taken care of a book, that pretends to

advance itself by bearing the character of a divinely inspired writing,

if it had not been really so? Which leads us to the next argument,

containing an advice, which is more convincing than any other; or, at

least, if this be added to those arguments which have been already

given, I hope it will more abundantly appear that the scriptures are the

word of God; since,

VII. The divine authority thereof is attested by God himself; and if, in

other cases, _we receive the witness of men_, surely, as the apostle

observes, _the witness of God is greater_, 1 John v. 9.

Now the testimony of God to the authority of scripture is twofold;

_First_, Extraordinary; _Secondly_, Ordinary; the extraordinary

testimony of God is that of miracles; the ordinary is taken from the use

which he makes of it, in convincing and converting sinners, and building

up in holiness and comfort, through faith, unto salvation.

1. As to the former of these, God has attested the truth hereof by

miracles. A miracle is an extraordinary divine work, whereby something

is produced, contrary to the common course and laws of nature: thus the

magicians confessed, that one of the miracles which Moses wrought was

the _finger of God_, Exod. viii. 19. Of these there are many undeniable

instances recorded in scripture, both in the Old and New Testament; and

these being above the power of a creature, and works peculiar to God,

they contain a divine testimony to the truth that is confirmed thereby,

for the confirmation whereof an appeal was made to them. Now when we say

that the divine authority of scripture was confirmed by miracles, we

mean,

(1.) That God has wrought miracles to testify his approbation of most of

the prophets and apostles, who were the inspired writers thereof,

whereby their mission was declared to be divine; and we cannot think

that God, who knows the hearts and secret designs of men, would employ

or send any to perform so great and important a work, if he knew them to

be disposed to deceive and impose on the world; or that they would in

any instance, call that his word which they did not receive from him.

The reason why men sometimes employ unfaithful servants about their work

is, because they do not know them; they never do it out of choice; and

therefore we cannot suppose that God, who perfectly knows the hearts of

men, would do so; therefore, having not only employed the penmen of

scripture as his servants, but confirmed their mission, and testified

his approbation of them, by miracles, this is a ground of conviction to

us that they would not have pretended the scriptures to be the word of

God, if they were not so.

Now that miracles have been wrought for this end, I think, needs no

proof; for we are assured hereof, not barely by the report of those

prophets, whose mission is supposed to have been confirmed thereby, but

it was universally known and received in the church, in those times, in

which they were wrought, and it is not pretended to be denied, by its

most inveterate enemies; the truth hereof, _viz._ that Moses, and

several other of the prophets, and our Saviour, and his apostles,

wrought miracles, can hardly be reckoned a matter in controversy; for it

is a kind of scepticism to deny it: and it is certain, that herein they

appealed to God for the confirmation of their mission; as Elijah is said

explicitly to have done, when he prays to this effect; _Lord God of

Abraham, Isaac, and of Israel, let it be known this day that thou art

God in Israel, and that I am thy servant; and that I have done all these

things at thy word_, 1 Kings xviii. 36. and we read, that God answered

him accordingly, _By the fire from heaven consuming the

burnt-sacrifice_, &c. ver. 38.

(2.) Such appeals to God, and answers from him, have attained their end,

by giving conviction to those who were more immediately concerned; this

is evident from what is said; in that the same prophet, having had his

request granted him, when God wrought a miracle, in raising the dead

child to life, the woman of Zarephath confessed, that by this she knew

_that he was a man of God, and that the word of the Lord, in his mouth,

was truth_, 1 Kings xvii. 21-24. And it is not denied by the Jews, the

most irreconcileable enemies to Christianity, that what is related in

the New Testament, concerning our Saviour’s, and his apostles, working

miracles, was true in fact; but the only thing denied by them is, that

this was a divine testimony, or that they were wrought by the hand of

God; and therefore the common reproach which is cast on them is, that

they were wrought by magic art, as the Jews of old objected to our

Saviour, _that he cast out devils by Beelzebub, the prince of the

devils_, Matth. xii. 24. and his reply to them was unanswerable, when he

said, that this objection would argue _Satan divided against himself_;

intimating, that he would never take such a method as this to overthrow

the Christian religion, which he could not but know was more conducive

to the establishment of it, than any other that could be used.

_Object._ 1. But if it be objected, that though miracles were wrought to

confirm the mission of several of the prophets, yet none were wrought to

confirm the divine authority of the subject matter of the scriptures:

_Answ._ To this it may be easily answered; that it is sufficient, if we

can prove that God has given his testimony, that he made choice of those

prophets to declare his mind and will to the world; and that he has

accordingly deemed them fit to be credited, and that they were not men

liable to any suspicion of carrying on a design to deceive the world; so

that if God himself not only styles them holy men, as he does all the

inspired writers in general, when he says, 2 Pet. i. 21. _Holy men of

God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost_, but also wrought

miracles to prove that they were his servants and messengers, employed

in this work; this is as convincing a testimony, as though every part of

scripture wrote by them had been confirmed by a miracle. Besides, it is

not unreasonable to suppose, that the church lived in those ages, in

which the various parts of scripture were written, had some

extraordinary proofs of their divine authority; since, in many of them,

miracles were very common, and, at the same time that the penmen of

scripture had the gift of inspiration, others had, what the apostle

calls, a _discerning of spirits_, 1 Cor. xii. 10. so that they were

enabled, by this means, to know whether the prophet, that pretended to

inspiration, was really inspired: this, to me seems very probably, the

sense of the apostle, when he says, 1 Cor. xiv. 32. _The spirits of the

prophets are subject to the prophets_, for he is discoursing before of

prophets speaking by divine revelation, and others judging thereof: now

if there was this extraordinary gift of discerning of spirits in the

ages, in which particular books of scripture were written, they who were

favoured herewith, had a convincing testimony of the inspiration of the

prophets and apostles, from the same Spirit by whom they were inspired,

by which means the divine authority of scripture was infallibly known to

them, and so imparted to others for their farther confirmation as to

this matter.

_Object._ 2. We are not now to expect miracles to confirm our faith, as

to the divine original of scripture; therefore how can we be said to

have a divine testimony.

_Answ._ As miracles are now ceased, so such a method of confirming

divine revelation is not necessary in all succeeding ages: God did not

design to make that dispensation too common, nor to continue the

evidence it affords, when there was no necessity thereof. Thus when the

scribes and Pharisees came to our Saviour, desiring to _see a sign_ from

him, Matt, xii. 38. he would not comply with their unreasonable demand;

and the apostle Paul takes notice of humour prevailing among the Jews in

his time, who then _required a sign_, 1 Cor, i, 22. but, instead of

complying with them herein, he refers them to the success of the gospel,

which is _the power of God to salvation_, as the only testimony to the

truth thereof that was then needful; and our Saviour, in the parable,

intimates, that the truth of divine revelation has been so well

attested, that _they who believe not Moses and the prophets, would not

be persuaded, though one rose from the dead_, Luke xvi, 31. Therefore,

since we have such a convincing evidence hereof, it is an unreasonable

degree of obstinacy to refuse to believe the divine authority of

scripture, merely because miracles are not now wrought; since, to demand

a farther proof of it, is no other than a tempting God, or disowning

that what he has done is sufficient for our conviction; and to say, that

for want of this evidence, our faith is not founded on a divine

testimony, is nothing to the purpose, unless it could be proved that it

is not founded on such a testimony formerly given, the contrary to which

is undeniably evident, since we have this truth confirmed by the

confession of the church in all the ages thereof, and therefore we have

as much ground to believe this matter, as though miracles were wrought

every day for its confirmation. This will farther appear, if we consider

the abundant ground we have to conclude that God has formerly given such

a testimony to his word; which leads us to enquire how far the testimony

of the church, in all the ages thereof, is to be regarded.

The church has given its suffrage, throughout all the ages thereof, to

the divine original of scripture, how much soever it has perverted the

sense of it. That this argument may be set in a true light, let us

consider what the Papists say to this matter, when they appeal to the

church, to establish the divine authority of scripture; and wherein we

differ from them; and how far its testimony is to be regarded, as a

means for our farther conviction. We are far from asserting, with them,

that the church’s testimony alone is to be regarded, without the

internal evidence of the divine authority of scripture, as though that

were the principal, if not the only foundation on which our faith is

built. If, indeed, they could prove the infallibility of the church, we

should more readily conclude the infallibility of its testimony; but all

their attempts of this nature are vain and trifling.

Moreover, we do not mean altogether the same thing by the church as they

do, when they intend by it a council convened together, to decree and

establish matters of faith, by him whom they pretend to be the visible

head thereof; and so a majority of votes of a body of men, every one of

whom are liable to error, must determine, and, according to them, give a

divine sanction to our faith. Nor do we think that those, whom they call

the fathers of the church, are to be any farther regarded, than as they

prove what they assert, since there is scarce any error or absurdity,

but what some or other of them have given into. We also distinguish

between the churches testimony, that the scripture was given by divine

inspiration, and the sense they give of many of its doctrines; as to the

latter of these, it has given us ground enough to conclude, that its

judgment is not much to be depended upon; however, we find that, in all

ages, it has given sufficient testimony to this truth, that the

scriptures are the word of God, and that they have been proved to be so,

by the seal which God has set thereunto, to wit, by the miracles that

have been wrought to confirm it. If therefore God has had a church in

the world, or a remnant whom he has preserved faithful; and if their

faith, and all their religion, and hope of salvation, has been founded,

without the least exception, on this truth, that the scriptures are the

word of God, we cannot altogether set aside this argument. But there is

yet another, which we lay more stress on, namely, the use which God has

made of it, which is the second thing to be considered, _viz._

2. His ordinary method of attesting this truth; it appears therefore, as

is farther observed in this answer, that the scriptures are the word of

God, from their light and power to convince and convert sinners, and to

comfort and build up believers to salvation. Here let us consider,

1. That the work of conviction and conversion is, and has been at all

times, experienced by those who have had any right or claim to

salvation; of which there have not only been various instances, in all

ages, but the very being of the church, which supposes and depends

thereon, is an undeniable proof of it.

2. As this work is truly divine, so the scriptures have been the

principal, if not the only direct means, by which it has been brought

about; so that we have never had any other rule, or standard of faith,

or revealed religion; nor has the work of grace been ever begun, or

carried on, in the souls of any, without it; from whence it evidently

appears, that God makes use of it to propagate and advance his interest

in the world, and has given his church ground to expect his presence

with it, in all his ordinances, in which they are obliged to pay a due

regard to scripture; and, in so doing, they have found that their

expectation has not been in vain, since God has, by this means,

manifested himself to them, and made them partakers of spiritual

privileges, which have been the beginning of their salvation.

3. It cannot be supposed that God would make this use of his word, and

thereby put such an honour upon it, had it been an imposture, or borne

the specious pretence of being instamped with his authority, if it had

not been so; for that would be to give countenance to a lie, which is

contrary to the holiness of his nature.

Thus we have considered the several arguments, whereby the scripture

appears to be the word of God; but since multitudes are not convinced

hereby, we have, in the close of this answer, an account of the means

whereby Christians come to a full persuasion as to this matter, and that

is the testimony of the Spirit in the heart of man, which is the next

thing to be considered. By this we do not understand that extraordinary

impression which some of old have been favoured with, who are said to

have been moved by the Holy Ghost, or to have had an extraordinary

unction from the Holy One, whereby they were led into the knowledge of

divine truths, in a way of supernatural illumination. This we pretend

not to, since extraordinary gifts are ceased; yet it does not follow

from hence, that the Spirit does not now influence the minds of

believers in an ordinary way, whereby they are led into, and their faith

confirmed in all necessary truths, and this in particular, that the

scriptures are the word of God; for we may observe, that no privilege

referring to salvation, was ever taken away, but some other, subservient

to the same end, has been substituted in the room thereof; especially,

unless a notorious forfeiture has been made of it, and the church, by

apostacy, has excluded itself from an interest in the divine regard; but

this cannot be said of the gospel-church in all the ages thereof, since

extraordinary gifts have ceased; therefore we must conclude, that being

destitute of that way, by which this truth was once confirmed, believers

have, instead of it, an inward conviction wrought by the Spirit of God,

agreeable to his present method of acting; otherwise this present

gospel-dispensation is, in a very material circumstance, much inferior

to that in which God discovered his mind and will to man in an

extraordinary way.

But that we may explain what we mean by this inward testimony of the

Spirit in the hearts of men, whereby they are fully persuaded that the

scriptures are the word of God, let it be considered,

(1.) That it is something more than barely a power, or faculty of

reasoning, to prove the scriptures to be divine, since that is common to

all; but this is a special privilege, given to those who are hereby

fully persuaded of this truth. Moreover, there may be a power of

reasoning, and yet we may be mistaken in the exercise thereof; and

therefore this is not sufficient, fully to persuade us that they are the

word of God, and consequently something more than this is intended in

this answer.

(2.) It is something short of inspiration; therefore, though the

scripture was known to be the word of God, by the Spirit of inspiration,

so long as that dispensation continued in the church, yet that privilege

being now ceased, the internal testimony of the Spirit contains a lower

degree of illumination, which has nothing miraculous attending it, and

therefore falls short of inspiration.

(3.) It is not an enthusiastic impulse, or strong impression upon our

minds, whereby we conclude a thing to be true, because we think it is

so; this we by no means allow of, since our own fancies are not the

standard of truth, how strong soever our ideas of things may be;

therefore,

(4.) This inward testimony of the Spirit contains in it a satisfying and

establishing persuasion, that the scriptures are the word of God, not

altogether destitute of other evidences, or convincing arguments: and

that which is more especially convincing to weak Christians, is taken

from the use which God makes of the scripture, in beginning and carrying

on the work of grace in their souls, who are thus convinced; and this

firm persuasion we find sometimes so deeply rooted in their hearts, that

they would sooner die ten thousand deaths than part with scripture, or

entertain the least slight thought of it, as though it were not divine;

and certainly there is a special hand of God in this persuasion, which

we can call no other than the inward testimony of the Spirit, whereby

they are established in this important truth.[45]

Footnote 20:

A Body of Divinity, Vol. 1 (of 4) Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism · 第 12 / 68 段