Nor are the original features of the rest of the edifice alt

[Illustration: THE JUMMA MUSJID, INDIA.]

Historic Buildings

As Seen and Described

by Famous Writers

EDITED AND TRANSLATED

BY ESTHER SINGLETON

AUTHOR OF “TURRETS, TOWERS AND TEMPLES,” “GREAT

PICTURES,” “WONDERS OF NATURE,” “FAMOUS PAINTINGS,”

“PARIS,” “LONDON” AND “A GUIDE TO THE OPERA,” ETC.

_With Numerous Illustrations_

[Illustration]

NEW YORK

DODD, MEAD & COMPANY

1903

_Copyright, 1903_

BY DODD, MEAD & COMPANY

_Published October, 1903_

Preface

Two principles of selection have guided me in the preparation of this

book, the sixth of a series which has met with a cordial reception.

One is the beauty or interest from an artistic standpoint; the other,

the historical associations. If the reader should miss some famous

edifices, he will kindly remember that a small volume cannot contain

a complete collection of all the historic buildings still standing,

and that many other historic buildings have already appeared in my

former books of this series, _Turrets, Towers and Temples_ and

_Romantic Castles and Palaces_.

I have endeavoured to find descriptions that deal with both views,

giving the history of the building itself, and a description of its

architectural features; and as this book contains, in consequence,

a great variety of buildings of all periods and many countries, the

student of both art and history will doubtless find pleasure in

comparing these various styles of architecture and in composing a

mental picture of events that have occurred within their walls.

Some of the buildings will aid him in realizing more fully, perhaps,

than before some of the various influences that have aided in

developing certain races; for instance, a study of the text and

pictures of the cathedrals of Monreale and Palermo will demonstrate

the presence of Norman and Saracen in Sicily. In other instances, it is

not a long vanished race, but the still-felt presence of some strong

personality like that of Shah Jehan, whose mosques and palaces and Taj

Mahal stand as monuments not only to the great conqueror, but to the

magnificence of his taste.

In this book, I have included several towers and fortresses as well

as castles and baronial halls, and the Certosa of Pavia and La Grande

Chartreuse, from which later historic home the Carthusian monks of

France have lately been driven. In addition to the cathedrals and

temples which have been the scenes of memorable historical events,

I have added the particularly sacred shrines of the Holy Sepulchre,

the Holy House of Loretto and the Campo Santo, Pisa, which attract

thousands of the faithful.

Many of the extracts I have translated expressly for this book, and I

have taken no liberties with the text, except a little cutting for the

sake of space limitations.

E. S.

NEW YORK, _September, 1903_.

Contents

THE JUMMA MUSJID, DELHI 1

G. W. STEEVENS.

SAN DONATO, MURANO 5

JOHN RUSKIN.

THE PALACE OF THE POPES, AVIGNON 20

CHARLES DICKENS.

THE CHURCH OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE, JERUSALEM 29

PIERRE LOTI.

LA GRANDE CHARTREUSE 40

WILLIAM BECKFORD.

THE TEMPLES OF HATCHIMAN, KAMAKOURA 54

AIMÉ HUMBERT.

CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF WELLS 62

EDWARD AUGUSTUS FREEMAN.

THE COLISEUM, ROME 75

I. EDWARD GIBBON.

II. CHARLES DICKENS.

GOLDEN TEMPLE OF THE SIKHS, LAHORE 84

G. W. STEEVENS.

THE GIRALDA, SEVILLE 92

THÉOPHILE GAUTIER.

THE CATHEDRAL OF MONREALE 95

JOHN ADDINGTON SYMONDS.

THE LUXEMBOURG PALACE, PARIS 102

AUGUSTUS J. C. HARE.

THE GREAT LAMA TEMPLE, PEKIN 107

C. F. GORDON-CUMMING.

HADDON HALL 112

JOHN LEYLAND.

CATHEDRAL OF PALERMO 125

JOHN ADDINGTON SYMONDS.

THE FORTRESS AND PALACE OF GWALIOR 129

LOUIS ROUSSELET.

THE HOLY HOUSE OF LORETTO 135

ARTHUR PENRHYN STANLEY.

THE ALCAZAR OF SEVILLE 145

EDMUNDO DE AMICIS.

THE TOWER OF BELEM, LISBON 149

ARTHUR SHADWELL MARTIN.

VENETIAN PALACES 156

THÉOPHILE GAUTIER

SAINT OUEN, ROUEN 163

L. DE FOURCAUD.

CARISBROOKE CASTLE, ISLE OF WIGHT 172

SIR JAMES D. MACKENZIE.

THE PANTHEON, ROME 178

AUGUSTUS J. C. HARE.

ST. LAURENCE, NUREMBERG 182

LINDA VILLARI.

THE TORRE DEL ORO, SEVILLE 190

EDMUNDO DE AMICIS.

CATHEDRAL OF ORVIETO 193

JOHN ADDINGTON SYMONDS.

THE BUILDINGS OF SHAH JEHAN, AGRA 206

G. W. STEEVENS.

THE PRIORY AND CHURCH OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW, LONDON 216

CHARLES KNIGHT.

KUTB MINAR, DELHI 228

I. G. W. STEEVENS.

II. ANDRÉ CHÉVRILLON.

KENILWORTH CASTLE 234

SIR JAMES D. MACKENZIE.

SANTA MARIA DELLA SALUTE, VENICE 244

JOHN RUSKIN.

THE RAMPARTS OF CARCASSONNE 247

A. MOLINIER.

THE CATHEDRAL OF MODENA 254

EDWARD AUGUSTUS FREEMAN.

THE CATHEDRAL OF RHEIMS 257

LOUIS GONSE.

THE CASTLE OF S. ANGELO, ROME 267

AUGUSTUS J. C. HARE.

SALISBURY CATHEDRAL 276

W. J. LOFTIE.

THE CASTLE OF ANGERS 286

HENRY JOUIN.

THE PAGODA OF TANJORE 294

G. W. STEEVENS.

THE VENDRAMIN-CALERGI, VENICE 300

THÉOPHILE GAUTIER.

A VISIT TO THE OLD SERAGLIO, CONSTANTINOPLE 303

PIERRE LOTI.

THE DUOMO, LEANING TOWER, THE BAPTISTERY AND THE

CAMPO-SANTO, PISA 310

H. A. TAINE.

ROCHESTER CASTLE 317

ARTHUR SHADWELL MARTIN.

SANTA CROCE, FLORENCE 326

JOHN RUSKIN.

THE CERTOSA OF PAVIA 336

JOHN ADDINGTON SYMONDS.

Illustrations

THE JUMMA MUSJID _India_ _Frontispiece_

PAGE

SAN DONATO _Italy_ 5

THE PALACE OF THE POPES _France_ 20

THE CHURCH OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE _Palestine_ 29

THE DAÏBOUDHS _Kamakoura_ 54

CATHEDRAL OF WELLS _England_ 62

THE COLISEUM _Italy_ 75

GOLDEN TEMPLE OF THE SIKHS _India_ 84

THE GIRALDA _Spain_ 92

THE CATHEDRAL OF MONREALE _Italy_ 95

THE LUXEMBOURG PALACE _France_ 102

HADDON HALL _England_ 112

CATHEDRAL OF PALERMO _Italy_ 125

FORTRESS AND PALACE OF GWALIOR _India_ 129

THE HOLY HOUSE OF LORETTO _Italy_ 135

THE ALCAZAR OF SEVILLE _Spain_ 145

THE TOWER OF BELEM _Portugal_ 149

THE FOSCARI PALACE _Italy_ 156

SAINT OUEN _France_ 163

CARISBROOKE CASTLE _England_ 172

THE PANTHEON _Italy_ 178

ST. LAURENCE _Germany_ 182

THE TORRE DEL ORO _Spain_ 190

CATHEDRAL OF ORVIETO _Italy_ 193

THE PEARL MOSQUE _India_ 206

THE CHURCH OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW _England_ 216

THE KUTB MINAR _Delhi_ 228

KENILWORTH CASTLE _England_ 234

SANTA MARIA DELLA SALUTE _Italy_ 244

THE RAMPARTS OF CARCASSONNE _France_ 247

THE CATHEDRAL OF MODENA _Italy_ 254

THE CATHEDRAL OF RHEIMS _France_ 257

THE CASTLE OF ST. ANGELO _Italy_ 267

SALISBURY CATHEDRAL _England_ 276

THE CASTLE OF ANGERS _France_ 286

THE PAGODA OF TANJORE _India_ 294

THE VENDRAMIN-CALERGI _Italy_ 300

FOUNTAIN OF THE OLD SERAGLIO _Turkey_ 303

THE DUOMO, LEANING TOWER,

BAPTISTERY AND CAMPO-SANTO _Italy_ 310

ROCHESTER CASTLE _England_ 317

SANTA CROCE _Italy_ 326

THE CERTOSA OF PAVIA _Italy_ 336

Historic Buildings

THE JUMMA MUSJID

G. W. STEEVENS

Delhi is the most historic city in all historic India.

It may not be the oldest--who shall say which is the oldest among

rivals all coeval with time?--though it puts in a claim for a

respectable middle-age, dating from 1000 B.C. or so. It

has at least one authentic monument which is certainly fourteen or

fifteen hundred years old. At that time Delhi’s master called himself

Emperor of the World, and emperors, at least of India, have ruled

there almost ever since. Mohammed, an Afghan of Ghor, took it in 1193;

Tamerlane, the Mogul, sacked it two hundred years later; Nadir Shah,

the Persian, in 1739; Ahmed Shah Durani, another Afghan, in 1756; the

Marathas took it three years later. Half a century on, in 1803, General

Lake took the capital of India for Britain. And British it has been

ever since--except for those few months in 1857, when Mutiny brought

the ghost of the Mogul empire into the semblance of life again; till

Nicholson stormed the breach in the Kashmir Bastion, and dyed Delhi

British for ever with his blood.

Look from the Ridge, whence the columns marched out to that last

capture: the battered trophy of so many conquerors remains wonderfully

fresh and fair. It seems more like a wood than a city. The rolls of

green are only spangled with white, as if it were a suburb of villas

standing in orchards. Only the snowy domes and tall minarets, the

cupolas and gilded pinnacles, betray the still great and populous city

that nestles below you and takes breath after her thousand troubles.

Let us go back to the city. Here at least is the Jumma Musjid, the

great mosque, saved complete out of the storms--a baby of little more

than two hundred years, to be sure, but still something. It is said to

be the largest mosque in the world--a vast stretch of red sandstone

and white marble and gold upstanding from a platform reached on three

sides by flights of steps so tall, so majestically wide, that they are

like a stone mountain tamed into order and proportion at an emperor’s

will. Above the brass-mounted doors rise red portals so huge that they

almost dwarf the whole--red galleries above them, white marble domes

above them, white marble minarets rising higher yet, with pillars

and cupolas and gilded pinnacles above all. Beside the gateways the

walls of the quadrangle seem to creep along the ground; then, at the

corners, rise towers with more open chambers, more cupolas and gilded

pinnacles. Within, above the cloistered quadrangle, bulge three pure

white domes--not hemispheres, like Western domes, but complete globes,

only sliced away at the base and tapering to a spike at the top--and a

slender minaret flanks each side.

The whole, to Western eyes, has a strange effect. Our own buildings

are tighter together, gripped and focused more in one glance; over the

Jumma Musjid your eye must wander, and then the mind must connect the

views of the different parts. If you look at it near you cannot see it

all; if far, it is low and seems to straggle. The West could hardly

call it beautiful: it has proportion, but not compass. Therefore it

does not abase you, as other great buildings do: somehow you have a

feeling of patronage towards it. Yet it is most light and graceful

with all its bulk: it seems to suit India, thus spread out to get its

fill of the warm sun. It looks rich and lavish, as if space were of no

account to it.

You have passed below the cloud-capped towers, out of the gorgeous

palaces--and here is Silver Street, Delhi’s main thoroughfare. The

pageant fades, and you plunge into the dense squalor which is also

India. Along the houses run balconies and colonnades; here also you see

vistas of pillars and lattice-work, but the stone is dirty, the stucco

peels, the wood lacks paint. The houses totter and lean together. The

street is a mass of squatting, variegated people; bulls, in necklaces

of white and yellow flowers, sleep across the pavements, donkeys stroll

into the shops, goats nibble at the vegetables piled for sale down the

centre of the street, a squirrel is fighting with a caged parrot. Here

is a jeweller’s booth, gay with tawdry paint; next, a baker’s, with the

shopkeeper snoring on his low counter, and everything an inch thick

with dust. At one step you smell incense; at the next, garbage.

Inimitable, incongruous India! And coming out of the walls, still

crumbling from Nicholson’s cannon, you see mill-chimneys blackening

the sky. Delhi, with local cotton, they tell you, can spin as fine as

Manchester. One more incongruity! The iron pillar, the ruined mosque,

the jewelled halls, the shabby street, and now the clacking mill. That

is the last of Delhi’s myriad reincarnations.

[Illustration: SAN DONATO, ITALY.]

SAN DONATO, MURANO

JOHN RUSKIN

We push our way on between large barges laden with fresh water from

Fusina, in round white tubs seven feet across, and complicated

boats full of all manner of nets that look as if they could never

be disentangled, hanging from their masts and over their sides;

and presently pass under a bridge with the lion of St. Mark on its

archivolt, and another on a pillar at the end of the parapet, a small

red lion with much of the puppy in his face, looking vacantly up in

the air (in passing we may note that, instead of feathers, his wings

are covered with hair, and in several other points the manner of his

sculpture is not uninteresting). Presently the canal turns a little

to the left, and thereupon becomes more quiet, the main bustle of

the water-street being usually confined to the first straight reach

of it, some quarter of a mile long, the Cheapside of Murano. We pass

a considerable church on the left, St. Pietro, and a little square

opposite to it with a few acacia trees, and then find our boat suddenly

seized by a strong green eddy, and whirled into the tide-way of one

of the main channels of the lagoon, which divides the town of Murano

into two parts by a deep stream some fifty yards over, crossed only by

one wooden bridge. We let ourselves drift some way down the current,

looking at the low line of cottages on the other side of it, hardly

knowing if there be more cheerfulness or melancholy in the way the

sunshine glows on their ruinous but whitewashed walls, and sparkles

on the rushing of the green water by the grass-grown quay. It needs

a strong stroke of the oar to bring us into the mouth of another

quiet canal on the farther side of the tide-way, and we are still

somewhat giddy when we run the head of the gondola into the sand on the

left-hand side of this more sluggish stream, and land under the east

end of the Church of San Donato, the “Matrice” or “Mother” Church of

Murano.

It stands, it and the heavy campanile detached from it a few yards, in

a small triangular field of somewhat fresher grass than is usual near

Venice, traversed by a paved walk with green mosaic of short grass

between the rude squares of its stones, bounded on one side by ruinous

garden walls, on another by a line of low cottages, on the third,

the base of the triangle, by the shallow canal from which we have

just landed. Near the point of the triangular space is a simple well,

bearing date 1502; in its widest part, between the canal and campanile,

is a four-square hollow pillar, each side formed by a separate slab of

stone, to which the iron hasps are still attached that once secured the

Venetian standard.

The cathedral itself occupies the northern angle of the field,

encumbered with modern buildings, small out-house-like chapels, and

wastes of white wall with blank square windows, and itself utterly

defaced in the whole body of it, nothing but the apse having been

spared; the original plan is only discoverable by careful examination,

and even then but partially. The whole impression and effect of the

building are irretrievably lost, but the fragments of it are still most

precious.

We must first briefly state what is known of its history.

The legends of the Romish Church, though generally more insipid and

less varied than those of Paganism, deserve audience from us on this

ground, if on no other, that they have once been sincerely believed

by good men, and have had no ineffective agency in the foundation of

the existent European mind. The reader must not therefore accuse me of

trifling, when I record for him the first piece of information I have

been able to collect respecting the cathedral of Murano: namely, that

the emperor Otho the Great, being overtaken by a storm on the Adriatic,

vowed, if he were preserved, to build and dedicate a church to the

Virgin, in whatever place might be most pleasing to her; that the storm

thereupon abated; and the Virgin appearing to Otho in a dream showed

him, covered with red lilies, that very triangular field on which we

were but now standing amidst the ragged weeds and shattered pavement.

The emperor obeyed the vision; and the church was consecrated on the

15th of August, 957.

Whatever degree of credence we may feel disposed to attach to this

piece of history, there is no question that a church was built on

this spot before the close of the Tenth Century: since in the year

999 we find the incumbent of the Basilica (note this word, it is of

some importance) di Santa Maria Plebania di Murano taking an oath of

obedience to the Bishop of the Altinat church, and engaging at the same

time to give the said bishop his dinner on the Domenica in Albis, when

the prelate held a confirmation in the mother church, as it was then

commonly called, of Murano. From this period, for more than a century,

I can find no records of any alterations made in the fabric of the

church, but there exist very full details of the quarrels which arose

between its incumbents and those of San Stefano, San Cipriano, San

Salvatore, and the other churches of Murano, touching the due obedience

which their less numerous or less ancient brotherhoods owed to St.

Mary’s.

These differences seem to have been renewed at the election of every

new abbot by each of the fraternities, and must have been growing

serious when the patriarch of Grado, Henry Dandolo, interfered in 1102,

and, in order to seal a peace between the two principal opponents,

ordered that the abbot of St. Stephen’s should be present at the

service in St. Mary’s on the night of the Epiphany, and that the abbot

of St. Mary’s should visit him of St. Stephen’s on St. Stephen’s day;

and that then the two abbots “should eat apples and drink good wine

together, in peace and charity.”[1]

But even this kindly effort seems to have been without result: the

irritated pride of the antagonists remained unsoothed by the love-feast

of St. Stephen’s day; and the breach continued to widen until the

abbot of St. Mary’s obtained a timely accession to his authority in

the year 1125. The Doge Domenico Michele, having in the Second Crusade

secured such substantial advantages for the Venetians as might well

counterbalance the loss of part of their trade with the East, crowned

his successes by obtaining possession in Cephalonia of the body of San

Donato, bishop of Eurœa; which treasure he having presented on his

return to the Murano basilica, that church was thenceforward called

the church of Sts. Mary and Donato. Nor was the body of the saint its

only acquisition: St. Donato’s principal achievement had been the

destruction of a terrible dragon in Epirus; Michele brought home the

bones of the dragon as well as of the saint; the latter were put in a

marble sarcophagus, and the former hung up over the high altar.

But the clergy of St. Stefano were indomitable. At the very moment

when their adversaries had received this formidable accession of

strength, they had the audacity “ad onta de’ replicati giuramenti, e

dell’ inveterata consuetudine,” to refuse to continue in the obedience

which they had vowed to their mother church. The matter was tried in

a provincial council; the votaries of St. Stephen were condemned,

and remained quiet for about twenty years, in wholesome dread of the

authority conferred on the abbot of St. Donato, by the Pope’s legate,

to suspend any of the clergy of the island from their office if they

refused submission. In 1172, however, they appealed to Pope Alexander

III, and were condemned again: and we find the struggle renewed at

every promising opportunity, during the course of the Twelfth and

Thirteenth Centuries; until at last, finding St. Donato and the dragon

together too strong for him, the abbot of St. Stefano “discovered” in

his church the bodies of two hundred martyrs at once!--a discovery,

it is to be remembered, in some sort equivalent in those days to

that of California in ours. The inscription, however, on the façade

of the church recorded it with quiet dignity:--“MCCCLXXIV. a dì XIV,

di Aprile. Furono trovati nella presente chiesa del protomartire San

Stefano, duecento e più corpi de’ Santi Martin, dal Ven. Prete Matteo

Fradello, piovano della chiesa.”[2] Corner, who gives this inscription,

which no longer exists, goes on to explain with infinite gravity, that

the bodies in question, “being of infantile form and stature, are

reported by tradition to have belonged to those fortunate innocents who

suffered martyrdom under King Herod; but that when, or by whom, the

church was enriched with so vast a treasure, is not manifested by any

document.”

The issue of the struggle is not to our present purpose. We have

already arrived at the Fourteenth Century without finding record of any

effort made by the clergy of St. Mary’s to maintain their influence by

restoring or beautifying their basilica; which is the only point at

present of importance to us. That great alterations were made in it

at the time of the acquisition of the body of St. Donato is however

highly probable, the mosaic pavement of the interior, which bears

its date inscribed 1140, being probably the last of the additions.

I believe that no part of the ancient church can be shown to be of

more recent date than this; and I shall not occupy the reader’s time

by any inquiry respecting the epochs or authors of the destructive

modern restorations; the wreck of the old fabric, breaking out from

beneath them here and there, is generally distinguishable from them at

a glance; and it is enough for the reader to know that none of these

truly ancient fragments can be assigned to a more recent date than

1140, and that some of them may with probability be looked upon as

remains of the shell of the first church erected in the course of the

latter half of the Tenth Century.

It is roofed by a concha, or semi-dome; and the external arrangement of

its walls provides for the security of this dome by what is, in fact,

a system of buttresses as effective and definite as that of any of the

northern churches, although the buttresses are obtained entirely by

adaptations of the Roman shaft and arch, the lower story being formed

by a thick mass of wall lightened by ordinary semicircular round-headed

niches, like those used so extensively afterwards in Renaissance

architecture, each niche flanked by a pair of shafts standing clear of

the wall, and bearing deeply moulded arches thrown over the niche. The

walls with its pillars thus forms a series of massy buttresses, on the

top of which is an open gallery, backed by a thinner wall, and roofed

by arches whose shafts are set above the pairs of shafts below. On the

heads of these arches rests the roof. We have, therefore, externally

a heptagonal apse, chiefly of rough and common brick, only with marble

shafts and a few marble ornaments; but for that reason all the more

interesting because it shows us what may be done, and what was done,

with materials such as are now at our own command; and because in its

proportions, and in the use of the few ornaments it possesses, it

displays a delicacy of feeling rendered doubly notable by the roughness

of the work in which laws so subtle are observed, and with which so

thoughtful ornamentation is associated.

We must now see what is left of interest within the walls.

All hope is taken away by our first glance; for it falls on a range

of shafts whose bases are concealed by wooden panelling, and which

sustains arches decorated in the most approved style of Renaissance

upholstery, with stucco roses in squares under the soffits, and egg

and arrow mouldings on the architraves, gilded, on a ground of spotty

black and green, with a small pink-faced and black-eyed cherub on every

keystone; the rest of the church being for the most part concealed

either by dirty hangings, or dirtier whitewash, or dim pictures on

warped and wasting canvas; all vulgar, vain, and foul. Yet let us not

turn back, for in the shadow of the apse our more careful glance shows

us a Greek Madonna, pictured on a field of gold; and we feel giddy

at the first step we make on the pavement, for it, also, is of Greek

mosaic waved like the sea, and dyed like a dove’s neck.

Nor are the original features of the rest of the edifice altogether

indecipherable; the entire series of shafts marked in the ground plan

on each side of the nave, from the western entrance to the apse, are

nearly uninjured; and I believe the stilted arches they sustain are

those of the original fabric, though the masonry is covered by the

Renaissance stucco mouldings. Their capitals, for a wonder, are left

bare, and appear to have sustained no farther injury than has resulted

from the insertion of a large brass chandelier into each of their

abaci, each chandelier carrying a sublime wax candle two inches thick,

fastened with wire to the wall above. The due arrangement of these

appendages, previous to festa days, can only be effected from a ladder

set against the angle of the abacus; and ten minutes before I wrote

this sentence, I had the privilege of watching the candle-lighter at

his work, knocking his ladder about the heads of the capitals as if

they had given him personal offence. He at last succeeded in breaking

away one of the lamps altogether, with a bit of the marble of the

abacus; the whole falling in ruin to the pavement, and causing much

consultation and clamour among a tribe of beggars who were assisting

the sacristan with their wisdom respecting the festal arrangements.

It is fortunate that the capitals themselves, being somewhat rudely

cut, can bear this kind of treatment better than most of those in

Venice. They are all founded on the Corinthian type, but the leaves

are in every one different: those of the easternmost capital of the

southern range are the best, and very beautiful, but presenting no

feature of much interest, their workmanship being inferior to most of

the imitations of Corinthian common at the period; much more to the

rich fantasies which we have seen at Torcello. The apse itself to-day

(12th September, 1851), is not to be described; for just in front of

it, behind the altar, is a magnificent curtain of a new red velvet with

a gilt edge and two golden tassels, held up in a dainty manner by two

angels in the upholsterer’s service; and above all, for concentration

of effect a star or sun, some five feet broad, the spikes of which

conceal the whole of the figure of the Madonna except the head and

hands.

The pavement is however still left open, and it is of infinite

interest, although grievously distorted and defaced. For whenever a new

chapel has been built, or a new altar erected, the pavement has been

broken up and readjusted so as to surround the newly inserted steps or

stones with some appearance of symmetry; portions of it either covered

or carried away, others mercilessly shattered or replaced by modern

imitations, and those of very different periods, with pieces of the

old floor left here and there in the midst of them, and worked round

so as to deceive the eye into acceptance of the whole as ancient. The

portion, however, which occupies the western extremity of the nave, and

the parts immediately adjoining it in the aisles, are, I believe, in

their original positions, and very little injured: they are composed

chiefly of groups of peacocks, lions, stags, and griffins,--two of

each in a group, drinking out of the same vase, or shaking claws

together,--enclosed by interlacing bands, and alternating with chequer

or star patterns, and here and there an attempt at representation

of architecture, all worked in marble mosaic. The floors of Torcello

and of St. Mark’s are executed in the same manner; but what remains

at Murano is finer than either, in the extraordinary play of colour

obtained by the use of variegated marbles. At St. Mark’s the patterns

are more intricate, and the pieces far more skillfully set together;

but each piece is there commonly of one colour: at Murano every

fragment is itself variegated, and all are arranged with a skill and

feeling not to be taught, and to be observed with deep reverence, for

that pavement is not dateless, like the rest of the church; it bears

its date on one of its central circles, 1140, and is, in my mind, one

of the most precious monuments in Italy, showing thus early, and in

those rude chequers which the bared knee of the Murano fisher wears

in its daily bending, the beginning of that mighty spirit of Venetian

colour, which was to be consummated in Titian.

But we must quit the church for the present, for its garnishings are

completed; the candles are all upright in their sockets, and the

curtains are drawn into festoons, and a pasteboard crescent, gay with

artificial flowers, has been attached to the capital of every pillar,

in order, together with the gilt angels, to make the place look as

much like Paradise as possible. If we return to-morrow, we shall

find it filled with woeful groups of aged men and women, wasted and

fever-struck, fixed in paralytic supplication, half kneeling, half

couched upon the pavement; bowed down, partly in feebleness, partly

in a fearful devotion, with their grey clothes cast far over their

faces, ghastly and settled into a gloomy animal misery, all but the

glittering eyes and muttering lips.

Fit inhabitants, these, for what was once the Garden of Venice, “a

terrestrial paradise,--a place of nymphs and demigods!”

We return, yet once again, on the following day. Worshippers and

objects of worship, the sickly crowd and gilded angels, all are gone;

and there far in the apse, is seen the sad Madonna standing in her

folded robe, lifting her hands in vanity of blessing. There is little

else to draw away our thoughts from the solitary image. An old wooden

tablet, carved into a rude effigy of San Donato, which occupies the

central niche in the lower part of the tribune, has an interest of

its own, but is unconnected with the history of the older church. The

faded frescoes of saints, which cover the upper tier of the wall of the

apse, are also of comparatively recent date, much more the piece of

Renaissance workmanship, shaft and entablature, above the altar, which

has been thrust into the midst of all, and has cut away part of the

feet of the Madonna. Nothing remains of the original structure but the

semi-dome itself, the cornice whence it springs, which is the same as

that used on the exterior of the church, and the border and face-arch

which surround it. The ground of the dome is of gold, unbroken except

by the upright Madonna, and usual inscription, M R [symbol] V. The

figure wears a robe of blue, deeply fringed with gold, which seems to

be gathered on the head and thrown back on the shoulders, crossing the

breast, and falling in many folds to the ground. The under robe, shown

beneath it where it opens at the breast, is of the same colour; the

whole, except the deep gold fringe, being simply the dress of the women

of the time. Le donne, anco elle del 1100, vestivano _di turchino con

manti in spalla_, che le coprivano dinanzi e di dietro.[3]

Round the dome there is a colored mosaic border; and on the edge of its

arch, legible by the whole congregation, this inscription:

“Quos Eva contrivit, pia Virgo Maria redemit;

Hanc cuncti laudent, qui Christi munere gaudent.”[4]

The whole edifice is, therefore, simply a temple to the Virgin: to her

is ascribed the fact of Redemption, and to her its praise.

“And is this,” it will be asked of me, “the time, is this the worship,

to which you would have us look back with reverence and regret?”

Inasmuch as redemption is ascribed to the Virgin, No. Inasmuch as

redemption is a thing desired, believed in, rejoiced in, Yes,--and Yes

a thousand times. As far as the Virgin is worshipped in place of God,

No; but as far as there is the evidence of worship itself, and of the

sense of a Divine presence, Yes. For there is a wider division of men

than that into Christian and Pagan: we ask what a man worships, we have

to ask whether he worships at all. Observe Christ’s own words on this

head: “God is a spirit; and they that worship Him must worship Him in

spirit, _and_ in truth.” The worshipping in spirit comes first,

and does not necessarily imply the worshipping in truth. Therefore,

there is first the broad division of men into Spirit worshippers and

Flesh worshippers; and then, of the Spirit worshippers, the farther

division into Christian and Pagan,--worshippers in Falsehood or in

Truth. I therefore, for the moment, omit all inquiry how far the

Mariolatry of the early church did indeed eclipse Christ, or what

measure of deeper reverence for the Son of God was still felt through

all the grosser forms of Madonna worship. Let that worship be taken at

its worst; let the goddess of this dome of Murano be looked upon as

just in the same sense an idol as the Athene of the Acropolis, or the

Syrian Queen of Heaven; and then, on this darkest assumption, balance

well the difference between those who worship and those who worship

not;--that difference which there is in the sight of God, in all ages,

between the calculating, smiling, self-sustained, self-governed man,

and the believing, weeping, wondering, struggling, Heaven-governed

man;--between the men who say in their hearts “there is no God,” and

those who acknowledge a God at every step, “if haply they might feel

after Him and find Him.” For that is indeed the difference which we

shall find, in the end, between the builders of this day and the

builders on that sand island long ago. They _did_ honour something

out of themselves; they did believe in spiritual presence judging,

animating, redeeming them; they built to its honour and for its

habitation; and were content to pass away in nameless multitudes, so

only that the labour of their hands might fix in the sea-wilderness a

throne for their guardian angel. In this was their strength, and there

was indeed a Spirit walking with them on the waters, though they could

not discern the form thereof, though the Master’s voice came not to

them, “It is I.” What their error cost them, we shall see here-after;

for it remained when the majesty and the sincerity of their worship

had departed, and remains to this day. Mariolatry is no special

characteristic of the Twelfth Century; on the outside of that very

tribune of San Donato, in its central recess, is an image of the Virgin

who receives the reverence once paid to the blue vision upon the inner

dome. With rouged cheeks and painted brows, the frightful doll stands

in wretchedness of rags, blackened with the smoke of the votive lamp at

its feet; and if we would know what has been lost or gained by Italy

in the six hundred years that have worn the marbles of Murano, let us

consider how far the priests who set up this to worship, the populace

who have this to adore, may be nobler than the men who conceived that

lonely figure standing on the golden field, or than those to whom it

seemed to receive their prayer at evening, far away, where they only

saw the blue clouds rising out of the burning sea.

THE PALACE OF THE POPES

CHARLES DICKENS

Hard by the cathedral stands the ancient Palace of the Popes, of which

one portion is now a common jail, and another a noisy barrack: while

gloomy suites of apartments, shut up and deserted, mock their own old

state and glory, like the embalmed bodies of kings. But we neither went

there to see state-rooms, nor soldiers’ quarters, nor a common jail,

though we dropped some money into a prisoners’ box outside, whilst

the prisoners themselves, looked through the iron bars, high up, and

watched us eagerly. We went to see the ruins of the dreadful rooms in

which the Inquisition used to sit.

[Illustration: THE PALACE OF THE POPES, FRANCE.]

A little, old, swarthy woman, with a pair of flashing black eyes--proof

that the world hadn’t conjured down the devil within her, though it

had had between sixty and seventy years to do it in--came out of the

Barrack Cabaret, of which she was the keeper, with some large keys

in her hands, and marshalled us the way that we should go. How she

told us, on the way, that she was a Government Officer (_concierge

du palais apostolique_) and had been for I don’t know how many

years; and how she had shown these dungeons to princes; and how she

was the best of dungeon demonstrators; and how she had resided in the

palace from an infant--had been born there, if I recollect right--I

needn’t relate. But such a fierce, little, rapid, sparkling, energetic

she-devil I never beheld. She was alight and flaming all the time. Her

action was violent in the extreme. She never spoke without stopping

expressly for the purpose. She stomped her feet, clutched us by the

arms, flung herself into attitudes, hammered against the walls with

her keys, for mere emphasis: now whispered as if the Inquisition were

there still: now shrieked as if she were on the rack herself; and had

a mysterious, hag-like way with her forefinger, when approaching the

remains of some new horror--looking back and walking stealthily, and

making horrible grimaces--that might alone have qualified her to walk

up and down a sick man’s counterpane, to the exclusion of all other

figures, through a whole fever.

Passing through the courtyard, among groups of idle soldiers, we turned

off by a gate, which this She-Goblin unlocked for our admission, and

locked again behind us: and entered a narrow court, rendered narrower

by fallen stones and heaps of rubbish; part of it choking up the

mouth of a ruined subterranean passage, that once communicated (or

is said to have done so) with another castle on the opposite bank of

the river. Close to this courtyard is a dungeon--we stood within it,

in another minute--in the dismal tower _des oubliettes_, where

Rienzi was imprisoned, fastened by an iron chain to the very wall that

stands there now, but shut out from the sky which now looks down into

it. A few steps brought us to the Cachots, in which the prisoners

of the Inquisition were confined for forty-eight hours after their

capture, without food or drink, that their constancy might be shaken,

even before they were confronted with their gloomy judges. The day

has not got in there yet, they are still small cells, shut in by four

unyielding, close, hard walls; still profoundly dark; still massively

doored and fastened as of old.

Goblin, looking back as I have described, went softly on, into a

vaulted chamber, now used as a store-room: once the chapel of the Holy

Office. The place where the tribunal sat was plain. The platform might

have been removed but yesterday. Conceive the parable of the Good

Samaritan having been painted on the wall of one of these Inquisition

chambers! But it was, and may be traced there yet.

High up in the jealous wall are niches where the faltering replies of

the accused were heard and noted down. Many of them had been brought

out of the very cell we had just looked into, so awfully: along the

same stone passage. We had trodden in their very footsteps.

I am gazing round me, with the horror that the place inspires, when

Goblin clutches me by the wrist, and lays, not her skinny finger, but

the handle of the key, upon her lips. She invites me, with a jerk, to

follow her. I do so. She leads me out into a room adjoining--a rugged

room, with a funnel-shaped, contracting roof, open at the top to the

bright day. I ask her what it is. She folds her arms, leers hideously,

and stares. I ask again. She glances round, to see that all the little

company are there; sits down upon a mound of stones; throws up her

arms, and yells out, like a fiend, “La Salle de la Question!”

The Chamber of Torture! And the roof was made of that shape to stifle

the victim’s cries! Oh, Goblin, Goblin, let us think of this awhile in

silence. Peace, Goblin! Sit with your short arms crossed on your short

legs, upon that heap of stones, for only five minutes, and then flame

out again.

Minutes! Seconds are not marked upon the Palace Clock, when, with

her eyes flashing fire, Goblin is up in the middle of the chamber,

describing, with her sunburnt arms, a wheel of heavy blows. Thus it

ran round! cries Goblin. Mash, mash, mash! An endless routine of heavy

hammers. Mash, mash, mash! upon the sufferer’s limbs. See the stone

trough! says Goblin. For the water torture! Gurgle, swill, bloat,

burst, for the Redeemer’s honour! Suck the bloody rag, deep down into

your unbelieving body, Heretic, at every breath you draw. And when

the executioner plucks it out, reeking with the smaller mysteries of

God’s own Image, know us for His chosen servants, true believers in the

Sermon on the Mount, elect disciples of Him who never did a miracle

but to heal: who never struck a man with palsy, blindness, deafness,

dumbness, madness, any one affliction of mankind; and never stretched

His blessed hand out, but to give relief and ease!

See! cries Goblin. There the furnace was. There they made the irons

red-hot. Those holes supported the sharp stake, on which the tortured

persons hung poised: dangling with their whole weight from the roof.

“But”--and Goblin whispers this--“Monsieur has heard of this tower?

Yes? Let Monsieur look down then!”

A cold air, laden with an earthy smell, falls upon the face of

Monsieur; for she has opened, while speaking, a trap-door in the

wall. Monsieur looks in. Downward to the bottom, upward to the top,

of a steep, dark, lofty tower: very dismal, very dark, very cold. The

Executioner of the Inquisition, says Goblin, edging in her head to look

down also, flung those who were past all further torturing down here.

“But look! does Monsieur see the black stains on the wall?” A glance,

over his shoulder, at Goblin’s keen eye, shows Monsieur--and would

without the aid of the directing key--where they are. “What are they?”

“Blood!”

In October, 1791, when the Revolution was at its height here, sixty

persons: men and women (“and priests,” says Goblin, “priests”): were

murdered, and hurled the dying and the dead, into this dreadful pit,

where a quantity of quicklime was tumbled down upon their bodies. Those

ghastly tokens of the massacre were soon no more; but while one stone

of the strong building in which the deed was done remains upon another,

there they will lie in the memories of men, as plain to see as the

splashing of their blood upon the wall is now.

Was it a portion of the great schemes of Retribution that the cruel

deed should be committed in this place? That a part of the atrocities

and monstrous institutions, which had been, for scores of years, at

work, to change men’s nature, should in its last service tempt them

with the ready means of gratifying their furious and beastly rage!

Should enable them to show themselves, in the height of their frenzy,

no worse than a great, solemn, legal establishment in the height of

its power? No worse! Much better. They used the Tower of the Forgotten

in the name of Liberty--their liberty; an earth-born creature, nursed

in the black mud of the Bastille moats and dungeons, and necessarily

betraying many evidences of its unwholesome bringing-up--but the

Inquisition used it in the name of Heaven.

Goblin’s finger is lifted; and she steals out again into the Chapel

of the Holy Office. She stops at a certain part of the flooring. Her

great effect is at hand. She waits for the rest. She darts at the Brave

Courier, who is explaining something; hits him a sounding rap on the

hat with the largest key: and bids him be silent. She assembles us all

round a little trap-door in the floor as round a grave. “Voilà!” she

darts down at the ring, and flings the door open with a crash, in her

goblin energy, though it is no light weight. “Voilà les oubliettes!

Voilà les oubliettes! Subterranean! Frightful! Black! Terrible! Deadly!

Les oubliettes de l’Inquisition!”

My blood ran cold as I looked from Goblin, down into the vaults, where

these forgotten creatures, with recollections of the world outside:

of wives, friends, children, brothers: starved to death, and made

the stones ring with their unavailing groans. But, the thrill I felt

on seeing the accursed wall below, decayed and broken through, and

the sun shining in through its gaping wounds, was like a sense of

victory and triumph. I felt exalted with the proud delight of living,

in these degenerate times, to see it. As if I were the hero of some

high achievement! The light in the doleful vaults was typical of the

light that has streamed in on all persecution in God’s name, but which

is not yet at its noon! It cannot look more lovely to a blind man

newly restored to sight, than to a traveller who sees it, calmly and

majestically, treading down the darkness of that Infernal Well.

Goblin, having shown _les oubliettes_ felt that her great

_coup_ was struck. She let the door fall with a crash, and stood

upon it with her arms akimbo, sniffing prodigiously.

When we left the place, I accompanied her into her house, under the

outer gateway of the fortress, to buy a little history of the building.

Her cabaret, a dark low room, lighted by small windows, sunk in the

thick wall--in the softened light, and with its forge-like chimney;

its little counter by the door, with bottles, jars, and glasses on it;

its household implements and scraps of dress against the wall; and a

sober-looking woman (she must have a congenial life of it with Goblin)

knitting at the door--looked exactly like a picture by OSTADE.

I walked round the building on the outside, in a sort of dream,

and yet with the delightful sense of having awakened from it, of

which the light, down in the vaults, had given me the assurance.

The immense thickness and giddy height of the walls, the enormous

strength of the massive towers, the great extent of the building, its

gigantic proportions, frowning aspect, and barbarous irregularity,

awaken awe and wonder. The recollection of its opposite old uses; an

impregnable fortress, a luxurious palace, a horrible prison, a place

of torture, the court of the Inquisition: at one and the same time,

a house of feasting, fighting, religion, and blood: gives to every

stone in its huge form a fearful interest, and imparts new meaning to

its incongruities. I could think of little, however, then, or long

afterwards, but the sun in the dungeons. The palace coming down to be

the lounging-place of noisy soldiers, and being forced to echo their

rough talk and common oaths, and to have their garments fluttering from

its dirty windows, was some reduction of its state, and something to

rejoice at; but the day in its cells, and the sky for the roof of its

chambers of cruelty--that was its desolation and defeat! If I had seen

it in a blaze from ditch to rampart, I should have felt that not that

light, nor all the light in all the fire that burns, could waste it,

like the sunbeams in its secret council-chamber, and its prisons.

Before I quit this Palace of the Popes, let me translate from the

little history I mentioned just now a short anecdote, quite appropriate

to itself, connected with its adventures.

“An ancient tradition relates, that in 1441, a nephew of Pierre de

Lude, the Pope’s legate, seriously insulted some distinguished ladies

of Avignon, whose relations, in revenge, seized the young man and

horribly mutilated him. For several years the legate kept _his_

revenge within his own breast, but he was not the less resolved upon

its gratification at last. He even made, in the fullness of time,

advances towards a complete reconciliation; and when their apparent

sincerity had prevailed, he invited to a splendid banquet, in this

palace, certain families, whom he sought to exterminate. The utmost

gayety animated the repast; but the measures of the legate were

well taken. When the dessert was on the board, a Swiss presented

himself, with the announcement that a strange embassador solicited an

extraordinary audience. The legate, excusing himself for the moment to

his guests, retired, followed by his officers. Within a few moments

afterwards, five hundred persons were reduced to ashes; the whole

of that wing of the building having been blown into the air with a

terrible explosion!”

After seeing the churches (I will not trouble you with churches just

now), we left Avignon that afternoon. The heat being very great, the

roads outside the walls were strewn with people fast asleep in every

little slip of shade, and with lazy groups, half asleep and half

awake, who were waiting until the sun should be low enough to admit of

their playing bowls among the burnt-up trees, and on the dusty road.

The harvest here was already gathered in, and mules and horses were

treading out the corn in the fields. We came, at dusk, upon a wild and

hilly country, once famous for brigands; and travelled slowly up a

steep ascent. So we went on until eleven at night, when we halted at

the town of Aix (within two stages of Marseilles) to sleep.

[Illustration: THE CHURCH OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE. PALESTINE.]

THE CHURCH OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE

PIERRE LOTI

The rain is nearly over. The sky is drying sadly and shows the first

blue spaces. It is damp and cold, and water runs all along the base of

the old walls.

Historic buildings · 第 1 / 21 段