INDUSTRIAL JUSTICE

You have questioned me about strikes. This question is and will be for a

long time the subject of great difficulties. Strikes are due to two

causes. One is the extreme sharpness and rapacity of the capitalists and

manufacturers; the other, the excesses, the avidity and ill-will of the

workmen and artisans. It is therefore necessary to remedy these two

causes.

But the principal cause of these difficulties lies in the laws of the

present civilization; for they lead to a small number of individuals

accumulating incomparable fortunes, beyond their needs, whilst the greater

number remains destitute, stripped and in the greatest misery. This is

contrary to justice, to humanity, to equity; it is the height of iniquity,

the opposite to what causes divine satisfaction.

This contrast is peculiar to the world of man: with other creatures, that

is to say with nearly all animals, there is a kind of justice and

equality. Thus in a shepherd's flock of sheep, in a troop of deer in the

country, among the birds of the prairie, of the plain, of the hill or of

the orchard, almost every animal receives a just share based on equality.

With them such a difference in the means of existence is not to be found:

so they live in the most complete peace and joy.

It is quite otherwise with the human species, which persists in the

greatest error, and in absolute iniquity. Consider an individual who has

amassed treasures by colonizing a country for his profit: he has obtained

an incomparable fortune, and has secured profits and incomes which flow

like a river, whilst a hundred thousand unfortunate people, weak and

powerless, are in need of a mouthful of bread. There is neither equality

nor brotherhood. So you see that general peace and joy are destroyed, the

welfare of humanity is partially annihilated, and that collective life is

fruitless. Indeed, fortune, honors, commerce, industry are in the hands of

some industrials, whilst other people are submitted to quite a series of

difficulties and to limitless troubles: they have neither advantages nor

profits, nor comforts, nor peace.

Then rules and laws should be established to regulate the excessive

fortunes of certain private individuals, and limit the misery of millions

of the poor masses; thus a certain moderation would be obtained. However,

absolute equality is just as impossible, for absolute equality in

fortunes, honors, commerce, agriculture, industry, would end in a want of

comfort, in discouragement, in disorganization of the means of existence,

and in universal disappointment: the order of the community would be quite

destroyed. Thus, there is a great wisdom in the fact that equality is not

imposed by law: it is, therefore, preferable for moderation to do its

work. The main point is, by means of laws and regulations to hinder the

constitution of the excessive fortunes of certain individuals, and to

protect the essential needs of the masses. For instance, the manufacturers

and the industrials heap up a treasure each day, and the poor artisans do

not gain their daily sustenance: that is the height of iniquity, and no

just man can accept it. Therefore, laws and regulations should be

established which would permit the workmen to receive from the factory

owner their wages and a share in the fourth or the fifth part of the

profits, according to the wants of the factory; or in some other way the

body of workmen and the manufacturers should share equitably the profits

and advantages. Indeed, the direction and administration of affairs come

from the owner of the factory, and the work and labor, from the body of

the workmen. In other words, the workmen should receive wages which assure

them an adequate support, and when they cease work, becoming feeble or

helpless, they should receive from the owner of the factory a sufficient

pension. The wages should be high enough to satisfy the workmen with the

amount they receive, so that they may be able to put a little aside for

days of want and helplessness.

When matters will be thus fixed, the owner of the factory will no longer

put aside daily a treasure which he has absolutely no need of (without

taking into consideration that if the fortune is disproportionate, the

capitalist succumbs under a formidable burden, and gets into the greatest

difficulties and troubles; the administration of an excessive fortune is

very difficult, and exhausts man's natural strength). And, the workmen and

artisans will no longer be in the greatest misery and want, they will no

longer be submitted to the worst privations at the end of their life.

It is, then, clear and evident that the repartition of excessive fortunes

amongst a small number of individuals, while the masses are in misery, is

an iniquity and an injustice. In the same way, absolute equality would be

an obstacle to life, to welfare, to order and to the peace of humanity. In

such a question a just medium is preferable. It lies in the capitalists

being moderate in the acquisition of their profits, and in their having a

consideration for the welfare of the poor and needy; that is to say, that

the workmen and artisans receive a fixed and established daily wage, and

have a share in the general profits of the factory.

It would be well, with regard to the social rights of manufacturers,

workmen and artisans, that laws be established, giving moderate profits to

manufacturers, and to workmen the necessary means of existence and

security for the future. Thus, when they become feeble and cease working,

get old and helpless, and die leaving children under age, these children

will not be annihilated by excess of poverty. And it is from the income of

the factory itself, to which they have a right, that they will derive a

little of the means of existence.

In the same way, the workmen should no longer rebel and revolt, nor demand

beyond their rights; they should no longer go out on strike, they should

be obedient and submissive, and not ask for impudent wages. But the mutual

rights of both associated parties will be fixed and established according

to custom by just and impartial laws. In case one of the two parties

should transgress, the courts of justice would have to give judgment, and

by an efficacious fine put an end to the transgression; thus order will be

re-established, and the difficulties settled. The interference of courts

of justice and of the Government in difficulties pending between

manufacturers and workmen is legal, for the reason that current affairs

between workmen and manufacturers cannot be compared with ordinary affairs

between private persons, which do not concern the public, and with which

the Government should not occupy itself. In reality, although they appear

to be matters between private persons, these difficulties between patrons

and workmen produce a general detriment; for commerce, industry,

agriculture and the general affairs of the country are all intimately

linked together. If one of these suffers an abuse, the detriment affects

the mass. Thus the difficulties between workmen and manufacturers become a

cause of general detriment.

The court of justice and the Government have therefore the right of

interference. When a difficulty occurs between two individuals with

reference to private rights, it is necessary for a third to settle the

question: this is the part of the Government: then the question of

strikes--which cause troubles in the country and are often connected with

the excessive vexations of the workmen, as well as with the rapacity of

manufacturers--how could it remain neglected?

Good God! is it possible that, seeing one of his fellow-creatures

starving, destitute of everything, a man can rest and live comfortably in

his luxurious mansion? He who meets another in the greatest misery, can he

enjoy his fortune? That is why, in the religion of God, it is prescribed

and established that wealthy men each year give over a certain part of

their fortune for the maintenance of the poor and unfortunate. That is the

foundation of the religion of God, and the most essential of the

commandments.

As now man is not forced nor obliged by the Government, if by the natural

tendency of his good heart, with the greatest spirituality, he goes to

this expense for the poor, this will be a thing very much praised,

approved and pleasing.

Such is the meaning of the good works in the Divine Books and Tablets.

Bahá'í World Faith · 第 25 / 142 题