Like the generality of barbarous races, the East Africans are wilful,

headstrong, and undisciplinable: in point of stubbornness and

restiveness they resemble the lower animals. If they cannot obtain the

very article of barter upon which they have set their mind, they will

carry home things useless to them; any attempt at bargaining is settled

by the seller turning his back, and they ask according to their wants

and wishes, without regard to the value of goods. Grumbling and

dissatisfied, they never do business without a grievance. Revenge is a

ruling passion, as the many rancorous fratricidal wars that have

prevailed between kindred clans, even for a generation, prove.

Retaliation and vengeance are, in fact, their great agents of moral

control. Judged by the test of death, the East African is a hardhearted

man, who seems to ignore all the charities of father, son, and brother.

A tear is rarely shed, except by the women, for departed parent,

relative, or friend, and the voice of the mourner is seldom heard in

their abodes. It is most painful to witness the complete inhumanity with

which a porter seized with small-pox is allowed by his friends,

comrades, and brethren to fall behind in the jungle, with several days’

life in him. No inducement--even beads--can persuade a soul to attend

him. Every village will drive him from its doors; no one will risk

taking, at any price, death into his bosom. If strong enough, the

sufferer builds a little bough-hut away from the camp, and, provided

with his rations--a pound of grain and a gourdful of water--he quietly

expects his doom, to feed the hyæna and the raven of the wild. The

people are remarkable for the readiness with which they yield to fits of

sudden fury; on these occasions they will, like children, vent their

rage upon any object, animate or inanimate, that presents itself. Their

temper is characterised by a nervous, futile impatience; under delay or

disappointment they become madmen. In their own country, where such

displays are safe, they are remarkable for a presumptuousness and a

violence of manner which elsewhere disappears. As the Arabs say, there

they are lions, here they become curs. Their squabbling and clamour pass

description: they are never happy except when in dispute. After a rapid

plunge into excitement, the brawlers alternately advance and recede,

pointing the finger of threat, howling and screaming, cursing and using

terms of insult which an inferior ingenuity--not want of will--causes to

fall short of the Asiatic’s model vituperation. After abusing each other

to their full, both “parties” usually burst into a loud laugh or a burst

of sobs. Their tears lie high; they weep like Goanese. After a cuff, a

man will cover his face with his hands and cry as if his heart would

break. More furious shrews than the women are nowhere met with. Here it

is a great truth that “the tongues of women cannot be governed.” They

work off excitement by scolding, and they weep little compared with the

men. Both sexes delight in “argument,” which here, as elsewhere, means

two fools talking foolishly. They will weary out of patience the most

loquacious of the Arabs. This development is characteristic of the East

African race, and “maneno marefu!”--long words!--will occur as a useless

reproof half a dozen times in the course of a single conversation. When

drunk, the East African is easily irritated; with the screams and

excited gestures of a maniac he strides about, frantically flourishing

his spear and agitating his bow, probably with notched arrow; the

spear-point and the arrow-head are often brought perilously near, but

rarely allowed to draw blood. The real combat is by pushing, pulling

hair, and slapping with a will, and a pair thus engaged require to be

torn asunder by half a dozen friends. The settled tribes are, for the

most part, feeble and unwarlike barbarians; even the bravest East

African, though, like all men, a combative entity, has a valour tempered

by discretion and cooled by a high development of cautiousness. His

tactics are of the Fabian order: he loves surprises and safe ambuscades;

and in common frays and forays the loss of one per cent. justifies a

_sauve qui peut_. This people, childlike, is ever in extremes. A man

will hang himself from a rafter in his tent, and kick away from under

him the large wooden mortar upon which he has stood at the beginning of

the operation with as much sang-froid as an Anglo-Saxon in the gloomy

month of November; yet he regards annihilation, as all savages do, with

loathing and ineffable horror. “He fears death,” to quote Bacon, “as

children fear to go in the dark; and as that natural fear in children is

increased with tales, so is the other.” The African mind must change

radically before it can “think upon death, and find it the least of all

evils.” All the thoughts of these negroids are connected with this life.

“Ah!” they exclaim, “it is bad to die! to leave off eating and drinking!

never to wear a fine cloth!” As in the negro race generally, their

destructiveness is prominent; a slave never breaks a thing without an

instinctive laugh of pleasure; and however careful he may be of his own

life, he does not value that of another, even of a relative, at the

price of a goat. During fires in the town of Zanzibar, the blacks have

been seen adding fuel, and singing and dancing, wild with delight. On

such occasions they are shot down by the Arabs like dogs.

It is difficult to explain the state of society in which the civilised

“social evil” is not recognised as an evil. In the economy of the

affections and the intercourse between the sexes, reappears that rude

stage of society in which ethics were new to the mind of now enlightened

man. Marriage with this people--as amongst all barbarians, and even the

lower classes of civilised races--is a mere affair of buying and

selling. A man must marry because it is necessary to his comfort,

consequently the woman becomes a marketable commodity. Her father

demands for her as many cows, cloths, and brass-wire bracelets as the

suitor can afford; he thus virtually sells her, and she belongs to the

buyer, ranking with his other live stock. The husband may sell his wife,

or, if she be taken from him by another man, he claims her value, which

is ruled by what she would fetch in the slave-market. A strong

inducement to marriage amongst the Africans, as with the poor in Europe,

is the prospective benefit to be derived from an adult family; a large

progeny enriches them. The African--like all barbarians, and, indeed,

semi-civilised people--ignores the dowry by which, inverting Nature’s

order, the wife buys the husband, instead of the husband buying the

wife. Marriage, which is an epoch amongst Christians, and an event with

Moslems, is with these people an incident of frequent recurrence.

Polygamy is unlimited, and the chiefs pride themselves upon the number

of their wives, varying from twelve to three hundred. It is no disgrace

for an unmarried woman to become the mother of a family; after matrimony

there is somewhat less laxity. The mgoni or adulterer, if detected, is

punishable by a fine of cattle, or, if poor and weak, he is sold into

slavery; husbands seldom, however, resort to such severities, the

offence, which is considered to be against vested property, being held

to be lighter than petty larceny. Under the influence of jealousy,

murders and mutilations have been committed, but they are rare and

exceptional. Divorce is readily effected by turning the spouse out of

doors, and the children become the father’s property. Attachment to home

is powerful in the African race, but it regards rather the comforts and

pleasures of the house, and the unity of relations and friends, than the

fondness of family. Husband, wife, and children have through life

divided interests, and live together with scant appearance of affection.

Love of offspring can have but little power amongst a people who have no

preventive for illegitimacy, and whose progeny may be sold at any time.

The children appear undemonstrative and unaffectionate, as those of the

Somal. Some attachment to their mothers breaks out, not in outward

indications, but by surprise, as it were: “Mámá! mámá!”--mother!

mother!--is a common exclamation in fear or wonder. When childhood is

passed, the father and son become natural enemies, after the manner of

wild beasts. Yet they are a sociable race, and the sudden loss of

relatives sometimes leads from grief to hypochondria and insanity,

resulting from the inability of their minds to bear any unusual strain.

It is probable that a little learning would make them mad, like the

Widad, or priest of the Somal, who, after mastering the reading of the

Koran, becomes unfit for any exertion of judgment or common sense. To

this over-development of sociability must be ascribed the anxiety always

shown to shift, evade, or answer blame. The “ukosa,” or transgression,

is never accepted; any number of words will be wasted in proving the

worse the better cause. Hence also the favourite phrase, “Mbáyá

we!”--thou art bad!--a pet mode of reproof which sounds simple and

uneffective to European ears.

The social position of the women--the unerring test of progress towards

civilisation--is not so high in East Africa as amongst the more highly

organised tribes of the south. Few parts of the country own the rule of

female chiefs. The people, especially the Wanyamwezi, consult their

wives, but the opinion of a brother or a friend would usually prevail

over that of a woman.

The deficiency of the East African in constructive power has already

been remarked. Contented with his haystack or beehive hut, his

hemisphere of boughs, or his hide acting tent, he hates and has a truly

savage horror of stone walls. He has the conception of the “Madeleine,”

but he has never been enabled to be delivered of it. Many Wanyamwezi,

when visiting Zanzibar, cannot be prevailed upon to enter a house.

The East African is greedy and voracious; he seems, however, to prefer

light and frequent to a few regular and copious meals. Even the

civilised Kisawahili has no terms to express the breakfast, dinner, and

supper of other languages. Like most barbarians, the East African can

exist and work with a small quantity of food, but he is unaccustomed,

and therefore unable, to bear thirst. The daily ration of a porter is 1

kubabah (= 1·5 lbs.) of grain; he can, with the assistance of edible

herbs and roots, which he is skilful in discovering in the least likely

places, eke out this allowance for several days, though generally, upon

the barbarian’s impulsive principle of mortgaging the future for the

present, he recklessly consumes his stores. With him the grand end of

life is eating; his love of feeding is inferior only to his propensity

for intoxication. He drinks till he can no longer stand, lies down to

sleep, and awakes to drink again. Drinking-bouts are solemn things, to

which the most important business must yield precedence. They celebrate

with beer every event--the traveller’s return, the birth of a child, and

the death of an elephant--a labourer will not work unless beer is

provided for him. A guest is received with a gourdful of beer, and,

amongst some tribes, it is buried with their princes. The highest orders

rejoice in drink, and pride themselves upon powers of imbibing: the

proper diet for a king is much beer and a little meat. If a Mnyamwezi be

asked after eating whether he is hungry, he will reply yea, meaning that

he is not drunk. Intoxication excuses crime in these lands. The East

African, when in his cups, must issue from his hut to sing, dance, or

quarrel, and the frequent and terrible outrages which occur on these

occasions are passed over on the plea that he has drunk beer. The

favourite hour for drinking is after dawn,--a time as distasteful to the

European as agreeable to the African and Asiatic. This might be proved

by a host of quotations from the poets, Arab, Persian, and Hindu. The

civilised man avoids early potations because they incapacitate him for

necessary labour, and he attempts to relieve the headache caused by

stimulants. The barbarian and the semi-civilised, on the other hand,

prefer them, because they relieve the tedium of his monotonous day; and

they cherish the headache because they can sleep the longer, and, when

they awake, they have something to think of. The habit once acquired is

never broken: it attaches itself to the heartstrings of the idle and

unoccupied barbarian.

In morality, according to the more extended sense of the word, the East

African is markedly deficient. He has no benevolence, but little

veneration--the negro race is ever irreverent--and, though his cranium

rises high in the region of firmness, his futility prevents his being

firm. The outlines of law are faintly traced upon his heart. The

authoritative standard of morality fixed by a revelation is in him

represented by a vague and varying custom, derived traditionally from

his ancestors; he follows in their track for old-sake’s sake. The

accusing conscience is unknown to him. His only fear after committing a

treacherous murder is that of being haunted by the angry ghost of the

dead; he robs as one doing a good deed, and he begs as if it were his

calling. His depravity is of the grossest: intrigue fills up all the

moments not devoted to intoxication.

The want of veneration produces a savage rudeness in the East African.

The body politic consists of two great members, masters and slaves.

Ignoring distinctions of society, he treats all men, except his chief,

as his equals. He has no rules for visiting: if the door be open, he

enters a stranger’s house uninvited; his harsh, barking voice is ever

the loudest; he is never happy except when hearing himself speak; his

address is imperious, his demeanour is rough and peremptory, and his

look “sfacciato.” He deposits his unwashed person, in his greasy and

tattered goat-skin or cloth, upon rug or bedding, disdaining to stand

for a moment, and he always chooses the best place in the room. When

travelling he will push forward to secure the most comfortable hut: the

chief of a caravan may sleep in rain or dew, but, if he attempt to

dislodge his porters, they lie down with the settled purpose of

mules--as the Arabs say, they “have no shame.” The curiosity of these

people, and the little ceremony with which they gratify it, are at times

most troublesome. A stranger must be stared at; total apathy is the only

remedy: if the victim lose his temper, or attempt to dislodge them, he

will find it like disturbing a swarm of bees. They will come for miles

to “sow gape-seed:” if the tent-fly be closed, they will peer and peep

from below, complaining loudly against the occupant, and, if further

prevented, they may proceed to violence. On the road hosts of idlers,

especially women, boys, and girls, will follow the caravan for hours; it

is a truly offensive spectacle--these uncouth figures, running at a

“gymnastic pace,” half clothed except with grease, with pendent bosoms

shaking in the air, and cries that resemble the howls of beasts more

than any effort of human articulation. This offensive ignorance of the

first principles of social intercourse has been fostered in the races

most visited by the Arabs, whose national tendency, like the Italian and

the Greek, is ever and essentially republican. When strangers first

appeared in the country they were received with respect and deference.

They soon, however, lost this vantage-ground: they sat and chatted with

the people, exchanged pleasantries, and suffered slights, till the

Africans found themselves on an equality with their visitors. The evil

has become inveterate, and no greater contrast can be imagined than that

between the manners of an Indian Ryot and an East African Mshenzi.

In intellect the East African is sterile and incult, apparently

unprogressive and unfit for change. Like the uncivilised generally, he

observes well, but he can deduce nothing profitable from his

perceptions. His intelligence is surprising when compared with that of

an uneducated English peasant; but it has a narrow bound, beyond which

apparently no man may pass. Like the Asiatic, in fact, he is stationary,

but at a much lower level. Devotedly fond of music, his love of tune has

invented nothing but whistling and the whistle: his instruments are all

borrowed from the coast people. He delights in singing, yet he has no

metrical songs: he contents himself with improvising a few words

without sense or rhyme, and repeats them till they nauseate: the long,

drawling recitative generally ends in “Ah! ha^{n}!” or some such

strongly-nasalised sound. Like the Somal, he has tunes appropriated to

particular occasions, as the elephant-hunt or the harvest-home. When

mourning, the love of music assumes a peculiar form: women weeping or

sobbing, especially after chastisement, will break into a protracted

threne or dirge, every period of which concludes with its own particular

groan or wail: after venting a little natural distress in a natural

sound, the long, loud improvisation, in the highest falsetto key,

continues as before. As in Europe the “laughing-song” is an imitation of

hilarity somewhat distressing to the spirits of the audience, so the

“weeping-song” of the African only tends to risibility. His wonderful

loquacity and volubility of tongue have produced no tales, poetry, nor

display of eloquence; though, like most barbarians, somewhat

sententious, he will content himself with squabbling with his

companions, or with repeating some meaningless word in every different

tone of voice during the weary length of a day’s march. His language is

highly artificial and musical: the reader will have observed that the

names which occur in these pages often consist entirely of liquids and

vowels, that consonants are unknown at the end of a word, and that they

never are double except at the beginning. Yet the idea of a syllabarium

seems not to have occurred to the negroid mind. Finally, though the East

African delights in the dance, and is an excellent timist--a thousand

heels striking the ground simultaneously sound like one--his performance

is as uncouth as perhaps was ever devised by man. He delights in a joke,

which manages him like a Neapolitan; yet his efforts in wit are of the

feeblest that can be conceived.

Though the general features of character correspond throughout the

tribes in East Africa, there are also marked differences. The Wazaramo,

for instance, are considered the most dangerous tribe on this line:

caravans hurry through their lands, and hold themselves fortunate if a

life be not lost, or if a few loads be not missing. Their neighbours,

the Wasagara of the hills, were once peaceful and civil to travellers:

the persecutions of the coast-people have rendered them morose and

suspicious; they now shun strangers, and, never knowing when they may be

attacked, they live in a constant state of agitation, excitement, and

alarm. After the Wazaramo, the tribes of Ugogo are considered the most

noisy and troublesome, the most extortionate, quarrelsome and violent on

this route: nothing restrains these races from bloodshed and plunder but

fear of retribution and self-interest. The Wanyamwezi bear the highest

character for civilisation, discipline, and industry. Intercourse with

the coast, however, is speedily sapping the foundations of their

superiority: the East African Expedition suffered more from thieving in

this than in any other territory, and the Arabs now depend for existence

there not upon prestige, but sufferance, in consideration of mutual

commercial advantage. In proportion as the traveller advances into the

interior, he finds the people less humane, or rather less human. The

Wavinza, the Wajiji, and the other Lakist tribes, much resemble one

another: they are extortionate, violent, and revengeful barbarians; no

Mnyamwezi dares to travel alone through their territories, and small

parties are ever in danger of destruction.

In dealing with the East African the traveller cannot do better than to

follow the advice of Bacon--“Use savages justly and graciously, with

sufficient guard nevertheless.” They must be held as foes; and the

prudent stranger will never put himself in their power, especially where

life is concerned. The safety of a caravan will often depend upon the

barbarian’s fear of beginning the fray: if the onset once takes place,

the numbers, the fierce looks, the violent gestures, and the confidence

of the assailants upon their own ground, will probably prevail. When

necessary, however, severity must be employed; leniency and forbearance

are the vulnerable points of civilised policy, as they encourage attack

by a suspicion of fear and weakness. They may be managed as the Indian

saw directs, by a judicious mixture of the “Narm” and “Garm”--the soft

and hot. Thus the old traders remarked in Guinea, that the best way to

treat a black man was to hold out one hand to shake with him, while the

other is doubled ready to knock him down. In trading with, or even when

dwelling amongst this people, all display of wealth must be avoided. A

man who would purchase the smallest article avoids showing anything

beyond its equivalent.

The ethnologist who compares this sketch with the far more favourable

description of the Kafirs, a kindred race, given by travellers in South

Africa, may suspect that only the darker shades of the picture are

placed before the eye. But, as will appear in a future page, much of

this moral degradation must be attributed to the working, through

centuries, of the slave-trade: the tribes are no longer as nature made

them; and from their connection with strangers they have derived nothing

but corruption. Though of savage and barbarous type, they have been

varnished with the semi-civilisation of trade and commerce, which sits

ridiculously upon their minds as a rich garment would upon their

persons.

Fetissism--the word is derived from the Portuguese feitiço, “a

doing,”--scil. of magic, by euphuism--is still the only faith known in

East Africa. Its origin is easily explained by the aspect of the

physical world, which has coloured the thoughts and has directed the

belief of man: he reflects, in fact, the fantastical and monstrous

character of the animal and vegetable productions around him. Nature, in

these regions rarely sublime or beautiful, more often terrible and

desolate, with the gloomy forest, the impervious jungle, the tangled

hill, and the dread uniform waste tenanted by deadly inhabitants,

arouses in his mind a sensation of utter feebleness, a vague and

nameless awe. Untaught to recommend himself for protection to a Superior

Being, he addresses himself directly to the objects of his reverence and

awe: he prostrates himself before the sentiment within him, hoping to

propitiate it as he would satisfy a fellow-man. The grand mysteries of

life and death, to him unrevealed and unexplained, the want of a true

interpretation of the admirable phenomena of creation, and the vagaries

and misconceptions of his own degraded imagination, awaken in him ideas

of horror, and people the invisible world with ghost and goblin, demon

and spectrum, the incarnations, as it were, of his own childish fears.

Deepened by the dread of destruction, ever strong in the barbarian

breast, his terror causes him to look with suspicion upon all around

him: “How,” inquires the dying African, “can I alone be ill when others

are well, unless I have been bewitched?” Hence the belief in magical and

supernatural powers in man, which the stronger minded have turned to

their own advantage.

Fetissism is the adoration, or rather the propitiation, of natural

objects, animate and inanimate, to which certain mysterious influences

are attributed. It admits neither god, nor angel, nor devil; it ignores

the very alphabet of revealed or traditionary religion--a creation, a

resurrection, a judgment-day, a soul or a spirit, a heaven or a hell. A

modified practical atheism is thus the prominent feature of the

superstition. Though instinctively conscious of a being above them, the

Africans have as yet failed to grasp the idea: in their feeble minds it

is an embryo rather than a conception--at the best a vague god, without

personality, attributes, or providence. They call that being Mulungu,

the Uhlunga of the Kafirs, and the Utika of the Hottentots. The term,

however, may mean a ghost, the firmament, or the sun; a man will

frequently call himself Mulungu, and even Mulungu Mbaya, the latter word

signifying bad or wicked. In the language of the Wamasai “Ai,” or with

the article “Engai”--the Creator--is feminine, the god and rain being

synonymous.

The Lake Regions of Central Africa: A Picture of Exploration, Vol. 2 · 第 24 / 37 段