It is a noteworthy and affecting circumstance, that, among the

immense number of the pictures in the catacombs which may be

ascribed to the first three centuries, scarcely one has been found

of a painful or sad character. The sufferings of the Saviour, his

passion and his death, and the martyrdoms of the saints, had not

become, as in after days, the main subjects of the religious Art of

Italy. On the contrary, all the early paintings are distinguished by

the cheerful and trustful nature of the impressions they were

intended to convey. In the midst of external depression, uncertainty

of fortune and of life, often in the midst of persecution, the Roman

Christians dwelt not on this world, but looked forward to the

fulfilment of the promises of their Lord. Their imaginations did not

need the stimulus of painted sufferings; suffering was before their

eyes too often in its most vivid reality; they had learned to regard

it as belonging only to earth, and to look upon it as the gateway to

heaven. They did not turn for consolation to the sorrows of their

Lord, but to his words of comfort, to his miracles, and to his

resurrection. Of all the subjects of pictures in the catacombs, the

one, perhaps, more frequently repeated than any other, and under a

greater variety of forms and types, is that of the Resurrection. The

figure of Jonah thrown out from the body of the whale, as the type

that had been used by our Lord himself in regard to his resurrection,

is met with constantly; and the raising of Lazarus is one of the

commonest scenes chosen for representation from the story of the New

Testament. Nor is this strange. The assurance of immortality was to

the world of heathen converts the central fact of Christianity, from

which all the other truths of religion emanated, like rays. It gave

a new and infinitely deeper meaning than it before possessed to all

human experience; and in its universal comprehensiveness, it taught

the great and new lessons of the equality of men before God, and of

the brotherhood of man in the broad promise of eternal life. For us,

brought up in familiarity with Christian truth, surrounded by the

accumulated and constant, though often unrecognized influences of

the Christian faith upon all our modes of thought and feeling, the

imagination itself being more or less completely under their control,--

for us it is difficult to fancy the change produced in the mind of

the early disciples of Christ by the reception of the truths which he

revealed. During the first three centuries, while converts were

constantly being made from heathenism, brought over by no worldly

temptation, but by the pure force of the new doctrine and the glad

tidings over their convictions, or by the contagious enthusiasm of

example and devotion,--faith in Christ and in his teachings must,

among the sincere, have been always connected with a sense of wonder

and of joy at the change wrought in their views of life and of

eternity. Their thoughts dwelt naturally upon the resurrection of

their Lord, as the greatest of the miracles which were the seal of

his divine commission, and as the type of the rising of the

followers of Him who brought life and immortality to light.

The troubles and contentions in the early Church, the disputes

between the Jew and the Gentile convert, the excesses of spiritual

excitement, the extravagances of fanciful belief, of which the

Epistles themselves furnish abundant evidence, ceased to all

appearance at the door of the catacombs. Within them there is

nothing to recall the divisions of the faithful; but, on the contrary,

the paintings on the walls almost universally relate to the simplest

and most undisputed truths. It was fitting that among these the

types of the Resurrection should hold a first place.

But the spiritual needs of life were not to be supplied by the

promises and hopes of immortality alone. There were wants which

craved immediate support, weaknesses that needed present aid,

sufferings that cried for present comfort, and sins for which

repentance sought the assurance of direct forgiveness. And thus

another of the most often-repeated of the pictures in the catacombs

is that of the Saviour under the form of the Good Shepherd. No

emblem fuller of meaning, or richer in consolation, could have been

found. It was very early in common use, not merely in Christian

paintings, but on Christian gems, vases, and lamps. Speaking with

peculiar distinctness to all who were acquainted with the Gospels,

it was at the same time a figure that could be used without exciting

suspicion among the heathen, and one which was not exposed to

desecration or insult from them; and under emblems of this kind,

whose inner meaning was hidden to all but themselves, the first

Christians were often forced to conceal the expression of their faith.

This figure recalled to them many of the sacred words and most

solemn teachings of their Lord: "I am the Good Shepherd; the good

shepherd giveth his life for the sheep." Often the good shepherd was

represented as bearing the sheep upon his shoulders; and the picture

addressed itself with touching and effective simplicity to him whom

fear of persecution or the force of worldly temptations had led away.

When one of his sheep is lost, doth not the shepherd go after it

until he find it? "And when he hath found it, he layeth it on his

shoulders, rejoicing." "There is joy in the presence of the angels of

God over one sinner that repenteth." How often, before this picture,

has some saddened soul uttered the words of the Psalm: "I have gone

astray like a lost sheep: seek thy servant, for I do not forget thy

commandments"! And as if to afford still more direct assurance of the

patience and long-suffering tenderness of the Lord, the Good

Shepherd is sometimes represented in the catacombs as bearing, not a

sheep, but a goat upon his shoulders. It was as if to declare that

his forgiveness and his love knew no limit, but were waiting to

receive and to embrace even those who had turned farthest from him.

In a picture of very early date in the Catacomb of St. Callixtus, the

Good Shepherd stands between a goat and a sheep, "as a shepherd

divideth his sheep from the goats; and he shall set the sheep on his

right hand and the goats on his left." But in this picture the order

is reversed,--the goat is on his right hand and the sheep on his left.

It was the strongest type that could be given of the mercy of God.

Sometimes the Good Shepherd is represented, not bearing the sheep on

his shoulders, but leaning on his crook, and with a pipe in his hands,

while his flock stand in various attitudes around him. Here again

the reference to Scripture is plain: "He calleth his own sheep by

name, and leadeth them out;... and the sheep follow him, for they

know his voice." Thus, under various forms and with various meanings,

full of spiritual significance, and suggesting the most invigorating

and consoling thoughts, the Good Shepherd appears oftener than any

other single figure on the vaults and the walls of the catacombs. It

is impossible to look at these paintings, poor in execution and in

external expression as they are, without experiencing some sense,

faint it may be, of the force with which they must have appealed to

the hearts and consciences of those who first looked upon them. It

is as if the inmost thoughts and deepest feeling of the Christians of

those early times had become dimly visible upon the walls of their

graves. The effect is undoubtedly increased by the manner in which

these paintings are seen, by the unsteady light of wax tapers, in

the solitude of long-deserted passages and chapels. In such a place

the dullest imagination is roused, troop on troop of associations

and memories pass in review before it, and the fading colors and

faint outlines of the paintings possess more power over it than the

glow of Titian's canvas, or the firm outline of Michel Angelo's

frescoes.

Another symbol of the Saviour which is frequently found in the works

of the first three centuries, and which soon afterwards seems to

have fallen almost entirely into disuse, is that of the Fish. It is

not derived, like that of the Good Shepherd, immediately from the

words of Scripture; though its use undoubtedly recalled several

familiar narratives. It seems to have been early associated with the

well-known Greek formula, [Greek: iaesous christos theon uios sotaer],

Jesus Christ the Saviour Son of God, arranged acrostically, so that

the first letters of its words formed the word [Greek: ichthus], fish.

The first association that its use would suggest was that of

Christ's call to Peter and Andrew, "Follow me, and I will make you

fishers of men,"--and thus we find, among the early Christian writers,

the name of "little fish," _pisciculi_, applied to the Christian

disciples of their times. But it would serve also to bring to memory

the miracle that the multitude had witnessed, of the multiplication

of the fishes; and it would recall that last solemn and tender

farewell meeting between the Apostles and their Lord on the shore of

the Sea of Tiberias, in the early morning, when their nets were

filled with fish,--and "Jesus then cometh, and taketh bread, and

giveth them, and fish likewise." And with this association was

connected, as we learn from the pictures in the catacombs, a still

deeper symbolic meaning, in which it represented the body of our

Lord as given to his apostles at the Last Supper. In the Cemetery of

Callixtus, very near the recently discovered crypt of Pope Cornelius,

are two square sepulchral chambers, adorned with pictures of an

early date. Those of the first chamber have almost utterly perished,

but on the wall of the second may be seen the image of a fish

swimming in the water, and bearing on his back a basket filled with

loaves of the peculiar shape and color used by the Jews as an

offering of the first fruits to their priests; beneath the bread

appears a vessel which shows a red color, like a cup filled with wine.

"As soon as I saw this picture," says the Cavaliere de Rossi, in his

account of the discovery, "the words of St. Jerome came to my mind,--

'None is richer than he who bears the body of the Lord in an osier

basket and his blood in a glass.'"

In the same cemetery, very near the crypt of St. Cecilia, there is a

passage wider than common, upon whose side is a series of sepulchral

cells of similar form, and ornamented with similar pictures. In one

of them a table is represented, with four baskets of bread on the

ground, on one side, and three on the other, while upon it three

loaves and a fish are lying. In another of the chambers is a picture

of a single loaf and of a fish upon a plate lying on a table, at one

side of which a man stands with his hands stretched out towards it,

while on the other side is a woman in the attitude of prayer. It

seems no extravagance of interpretation to read in these pictures

the symbol of that memorial service which Jesus had established for

his followers,--a service which has rarely been celebrated under

circumstances more adapted to give to it its full effect, and to awaken

in the souls of those who joined in it all the deep and affecting

memories of its first institution, than when the bread and wine were

partaken of in memory of the Lord within the small and secret chapels

of the early catacombs. To the Christians who assembled there in the

days when to profess the name of Christ was to venture all things for

his sake, his presence was a reality in their hearts, and his voice

was heard as it was heard by his immediate followers who sat with him

at the table in the upper chamber. [1]

[Footnote 1: The Cavaliere de Rossi, in his very learned tract,

_De Christianis Monumentis [Greek: IChThUN] exhibentibus_,

expresses the belief that these pictures, besides their direct and

simple reference to the Lord's Supper, exhibit also the Catholic

doctrine of the Real Presence in the Eucharist. The bread he

considers as the obvious material symbol, the fish the mystical

symbol of the transubstantiation. His interpretation is at least

doubtful. The bread was to be eaten in remembrance of the Lord, and

the fish was represented as the image which recalled his words, that

have been perverted by materialistic imaginations so far from their

original meaning,--"This is my body which is given for you." But the

date of the origin of false opinions is a matter of comparative

unimportance.]

There are several instances, among these subterranean pictures, of a

symbolic representation of the Saviour, drawn, not from Scripture,

but from a heathen original. It is that of Orpheus playing upon his

lyre, and drawing all creatures to him by the sweetness of his

strains. It was a fiction widely spread soon after the introduction

of Christianity among the Gentiles, that Orpheus, like the Sibyls and

some other of the characters of mythology, had had some blind

revelation of the coming of a saviour of the world, and had uttered

indistinct prophecies of the event. Forgeries, similar to those of

the Sibylline Verses, professing to be the remains of the poems of

Orpheus, were made among the Alexandrian Christians, and for a long

period his name was held in popular esteem, as that of a heathen

prophet of Christian truth. Whether the paintings in the catacombs

took their origin from these fictions must be uncertain; but driven,

as the Roman Christians were, to hide the truth under a symbol that

should be inoffensive, and should not reveal its meaning to pagan

eyes, it was not strange that they should select this of the ancient

poet. As he had drawn beasts and trees and stones to listen to the

music of his lyre, so Christ, with persuasive sweetness and

compelling force, drew men more savage than beasts, more rooted in

the earth than trees, more cold than stones, to listen to and follow

him. As Orpheus caused even the kingdom of Death to render back the

lost, so Christ drew the souls of men from the very gates of hell,

and made the grave restore its dead. And thus from the old heathen

story the Christian drew new suggestions and fresh meaning, and

beheld in it an unconscious setting-forth of many holy truths.

A subject from the Gospels, which is often represented, and which

was used with a somewhat obscure symbolic meaning, is that of the

man sick of the palsy, cured by the Saviour with the words,

"Arise, take up thy bed, and go to thine house." It belongs,

according to the ancient interpretation, to the series of subjects

that embody the doctrine of the Resurrection. It is thus explained

by St. Ambrose, St. Augustine, and others of the fathers. They

understood the words of Christ as addressed to them with the meaning,

"Arise, leave the things of this world, have faith, and go forward

to thy abiding home in heaven." Such an interpretation is entirely

congruous with the general tone of thought and feeling exhibited in

many other common paintings in the catacombs. But later Romanist

writers have attempted to connect its interpretation with the

doctrine of the Forgiveness of Sins, as embodied in what is called

the power of the Church in the holy sacrament of Penance. They lay

stress on the words, "Be of good cheer, thy sins are forgiven thee,"

and suppose that the picture expresses the belief that the delegated

power of forgiving sins still remained on earth. Undoubtedly the

painting may well have recalled to mind these earlier words of the

narrative, as well as the later ones, and with the same comforting

assurance that was afforded by the emblem of the Good Shepherd; but

there seems no just reason for supposing it to have borne any

reference to the peculiar doctrine of the Roman Church. The pictures

themselves, so far as we are acquainted with them, seem to

contradict this assumption; for they, without exception, represent

the paralytic in the last act of the narrative, already on his feet

and bearing his bed. [2]

[Footnote 2: One picture of this scene in the Catacombs of St. Hermes

is said to be in immediate connection with the sacrament of Penance

"represented literally, in the form of a Christian kneeling on both

knees before a priest, who is giving him absolution." We have not

seen the original of this picture, and we know of no copy of it. It

is not given either by Bosio or in Perret's great work. Before

accepting it in evidence, its date must be ascertained, and the

possibility of a more natural explanation of it excluded. How is one

figure known to be that of a priest? and in what manner is the act

of giving absolution expressed?]

Among the favorite subjects from the Old Testament are four from the

life of Moses,--his taking off his shoes at the command of the Lord,

his exhibiting the manna to the people, his receiving the tables of

the Law, and his striking the rock in the desert. Of these, the first

and the last are most common, and the truths which they were

intended to typify seem to have been most dwelt upon. Moses was

regarded in the ancient Church as the type, in the old dispensation,

of our Saviour in the new. Thus as the narrative of the command to

Moses to take off his shoes was immediately connected with the

promise of the deliverance of the children of Israel from the land

of bondage, so it was regarded as the figure under which was to be

seen the promise of the greater deliverance of the world through

faith in Jesus Christ, and its freedom from spiritual bondage.

Moreover, the shoes were put off, "for the place whereon thou

standest is holy ground"; and it is a natural supposition to regard

the act as having been considered the symbol of that Holiness to the

Lord which was the necessary preparation for the great deliverance.

Like so many other of the paintings, it led forward the thoughts and

the affections from time to eternity. And this figure was also, we

may well suppose, taken as an immediate type of the Resurrection, in

connection with the words of Jesus, "Now that the dead are raised

even Moses showed at the bush, when he calleth the Lord" (or, as it

should be translated, "when, in telling you of the bush, he says

that the Lord called himself") "the God of Abraham, and the God of

Isaac, and the God of Jacob. For God is not the God of the dead, but

of the living." With this interpretation, it affords another

instance of the constancy with which the Christians connected the

thought of immortality with the presence of death.

So also the smiting of the rock, so that the water came forth

abundantly, was adopted as the sign of the giving forth of the

living water springing up into everlasting life. "The rock was Christ,"

said St. Paul, and it is possible, that, with a secondary

interpretation, the smiting of the rock was sometimes regarded as

typical of the sufferings of the Saviour. The picture of this

miracle is repeated again and again, and one of the noblest figures

in the whole range of subterranean Art, a figure of surpassing

dignity and grandeur, is that of Moses in this sublime scene in one

of the chapels of the Cemetery of St. Agnes. In the performance of

this miracle, Moses is represented with a rod in his hand; and a

similar rod, apparently as the sign of power, is seen in the hands

of Christ, in the paintings which represent his miracles. It is a

curious illustration of the gradual progress of the ideas now

current in the Roman Church, that upon sarcophagi of the fourth and

fifth centuries St. Peter is found sculptured with the same rod in

his hands,--emblematic, unquestionably, of the doctrine of his being

the Vicegerent of Christ,--and on the bottom of a glass vessel of

late date, found in the catacombs, the miracle of the striking of

the rock is depicted, but at the side of the figure is the name, not

of Moses, but of Peter,--for the Church had by this time advanced

far in its assumptions.

The story of Jonah appears also in four different scenes upon the

walls of the chapels and burial-chambers. In the first, the prophet

appears as being cast into the sea; in the second, swallowed by the

great fish; in the third, thrown out upon dry land; and in the fourth,

lying under the gourd. They are not found together, or in series;

but sometimes one and sometimes another of these scenes was painted,

according to the fancy or the thought of the artist. The swallowing

of Jonah, and his deliverance from the belly of the whale, has

already been referred to as one of the naturally suggested types of

the Resurrection. When the prophet is shown as lying under a gourd,

(which is painted as a vine climbing over a trellis-work, to

represent the booth that Jonah made for himself,) the picture may

perhaps have been read as a double lesson. As God "made the gourd to

come up over Jonah, that it might be a shadow over his head, to

deliver him from his grief," so he would deliver from their grief

those who now trusted in him; but as he also made the gourd to wither,

so that "the sun beat upon the head of Jonah that he fainted and

wished in himself to die," it was for them to remember their utter

dependence on the will of God, to prepare themselves for the sorrows

as for the joys of life. Nor was this all; the story of Jonah was

one especially fitted to remind the recent convert of the

long-suffering and grace of God, and to suggest to those who were

enduring the extremities of persecution the rebuke with which the

Lord had chastened even his prophet for his desire for vengeance upon

those who had long dwelt in evil ways. It recalled to them the new

commandment of love to their enemies, and it bade them welcome with

rejoicing even the latest and most reluctant listener to the truth.

It repressed spiritual pride, and checked too ready anger. Was not

Rome even greater "than Nineveh, that great city, wherein are more

than six-score thousand persons that cannot discern between their

right hand and their left hand, and also much cattle"? Such were some,

at least, of the meanings which the Christians of the catacombs may

have seen in these pictures. It would be long to enter into the more

subtile and less satisfactory interpretations of their symbolic

meanings which are to be found in the works of some of the later

fathers, and which afford, as in many other instances, illustrations

of the extravagance of symbolism into which the studies of the cell,

the darkness of their age, and the insufficiency of their education

often led them.

Two subjects are of frequent repetition in the catacombs, which bear

a direct reference to the personal circumstances in which the

Christians from time to time found themselves. One is that of Daniel

in the lions' den,--the other that of the Three Children of Israel

in the fiery furnace. Both were types of persecution and of

deliverance. "Thy God, whom thou servest continually, he will

deliver thee." Daniel is uniformly represented in the attitude of

prayer,--the attitude adopted by the early Christians, standing with

arms outstretched. Very often single figures with no names attached

to them are thus represented above or by the side of graves. They

were probably intended as figures of those who lay within them,

figures of those who had been constant in prayer; and this conjecture

is almost established as a certainty by the existence of a few of

these figures with names inscribed above them,--as, for instance,

"HILARA IN PACE."

Noah in the ark is also one of the repeated subjects from the Old

Testament; the ark being represented as a sort of square box, in the

middle of which Noah stands, sometimes in prayer, and sometimes with

the dove flying towards him, bearing a branch of olive. It was the

type of the Church, the whole body of Christians, floating in the

midst of storms, but with the promise of peace; or, with wider

signification, it was the type of the world saved through the

revelation of Christ. It bore reference also to the words of St.

Peter, in his First Epistle, concerning the ark, "wherein few, that

is eight souls, were saved by water; the like figure whereunto, even

baptism, doth also now save us by the resurrection of Jesus Christ."

Sometimes, indeed, the act of baptism is represented in a more

literal manner, by a naked figure immersed in the water; sometimes,

perhaps, by still other types.

Paintings of the temptation and the fall of Adam and Eve, in which

the composition often reminds one of that adopted by the later

masters, are often seen on the walls; and the sacrifice of Abraham,

in which with reverent and just simplicity the interference of the

Almighty is represented by a hand issuing from the clouds, is a

common subject. Less frequent are pictures of David with his sling,

of Tobit with the fish, of Susanna and the elders, treated

symbolically, and some few other Old Testament stories. Their

typical meaning was plain to the minds of those who frequented the

catacombs. From the Gospels many scenes are represented in addition

to those we have already mentioned: among the most common are the

miracle of the multiplication of the loaves; our Saviour seated,

with two or more figures standing near him; and his restoring sight

to the blind. Every year's new excavations bring to light some new

picture, and our acquaintance with the Art of the catacombs is

continually receiving interesting additions.

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 02, No. 08, June 1858 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 8 / 21 段