RONDELET, THE HUGUENOT NATURALIST {358}

"Apollo, god of medicine, exiled from the rest of the earth, was straying

once across the Narbonnaise in Gaul, seeking to fix his abode there.

Driven from Asia, from Africa, and from the rest of Europe, he wandered

through all the towns of the province in search of a place propitious for

him and for his disciples. At last he perceived a new city, constructed

from the ruins of Maguelonne, of Lattes, and of Substantion. He

contemplated long its site, its aspect, its neighbourhood, and resolved

to establish on this hill of Montpellier a temple for himself and his

priests. All smiled on his desires. By the genius of the soil, by the

character of the inhabitants, no town is more fit for the culture of

letters, and above all of medicine. What site is more delicious and more

lovely? A heaven pure and smiling; a city built with magnificence; men

born for all the labours of the intellect. All around vast horizons and

enchanting sites--meadows, vines, olives, green champaigns; mountains and

hills, rivers, brooks, lagoons, and the sea. Everywhere a luxuriant

vegetation--everywhere the richest production of the land and the water.

Hail to thee, sweet and dear city! Hail, happy abode of Apollo, who

spreadest afar the light of the glory of thy name!"

"This fine tirade," says Dr. Maurice Raynaud--from whose charming book on

the 'Doctors of the Time of Moliere' I quote--"is not, as one might

think, the translation of a piece of poetry. It is simply part of a

public oration by Francois Fanchon, one of the most illustrious

chancellors of the faculty of medicine of Montpellier in the seventeenth

century." "From time immemorial," he says, "'the faculty' of Montpellier

had made itself remarkable by a singular mixture of the sacred and the

profane. The theses which were sustained there began by an invocation to

God, the Blessed Virgin, and St. Luke, and ended by these words:--'This

thesis will be sustained in the sacred Temple of Apollo.'"

But however extravagant Chancellor Fanchon's praises of his native city

may seem, they are really not exaggerated. The Narbonnaise, or

Languedoc, is perhaps the most charming district of charming France. In

the far north-east gleam the white Alps; in the far south-west the white

Pyrenees; and from the purple glens and yellow downs of the Cevennes on

the northwest, the Herault slopes gently down towards the "Etangs," or

great salt-water lagoons, and the vast alluvial flats of the Camargue,

the field of Caius Marius, where still run herds of half-wild horses,

descended from some ancient Roman stock; while beyond all glitters the

blue Mediterranean. The great almond orchards, each one sheet of rose-

colour in spring; the mulberry orchards, the oliveyards, the vineyards,

cover every foot of available upland soil: save where the rugged and arid

downs are sweet with a thousand odoriferous plants, from which the bees

extract the famous white honey of Narbonne. The native flowers and

shrubs, of a beauty and richness rather Eastern than European, have made

the 'Flora Monspeliensis,' and with it the names of Rondelet and his

disciples, famous among botanists; and the strange fish and shells upon

its shores afforded Rondelet materials for his immortal work upon the

'Animals of the Sea.' The innumerable wild fowl of the "Bouches du

Rhone;" the innumerable songsters and other birds of passage, many of

them unknown in these islands, and even in the north of France itself,

which haunt every copse of willow and aspen along the brook sides; the

gaudy and curious insects which thrive beneath that clear, fierce, and

yet bracing sunlight; all these have made the district of Montpellier a

home prepared by Nature for those who study and revere her.

Neither was Chancellor Fanchon misled by patriotism, when he said the

pleasant people who inhabit that district are fit for all the labours of

the intellect. They are a very mixed race, and like most mixed races,

quick-witted, and handsome also. There is probably much Roman blood

among them, especially in the towns; for Languedoc, or Gallia

Narbonnensis, as it was called of old, was said to be more Roman than

Rome itself. The Roman remains are more perfect and more interesting--so

the late Dr. Whewell used to say--than any to be seen now in Italy; and

the old capital, Narbonne itself, was a complete museum of Roman

antiquities ere Francis I. destroyed it, in order to fortify the city

upon a modern system against the invading armies of Charles V. There

must be much Visigothic blood likewise in Languedoc; for the Visigothic

Kings held their courts there from the fifth century, until the time that

they were crushed by the invading Moors. Spanish blood, likewise, there

may be; for much of Languedoc was held in the early Middle Age by those

descendants of Eudes of Acquitaine who established themselves as kings of

Majorca and Arragon; and Languedoc did not become entirely French till

1349, when Philip le Bel bought Montpellier of those potentates. The

Moors, too, may have left some traces of their race behind. They held

the country from about A.D. 713 to 758, when they were finally expelled

by Charles Martel and Eudes. One sees to this day their towers of meagre

stone-work, perched on the grand Roman masonry of those old

amphitheatres, which they turned into fortresses. One may see, too--so

tradition holds--upon those very amphitheatres the stains of the fires

with which Charles Martel smoked them out; and one may see, too, or fancy

that one sees, in the aquiline features, the bright black eyes, the lithe

and graceful gestures, which are so common in Languedoc, some touch of

the old Mahommedan race, which passed like a flood over that Christian

land.

Whether or not the Moors left behind any traces of their blood, they left

behind, at least, traces of their learning; for the university of

Montpellier claimed to have been founded by Moors at a date of altogether

abysmal antiquity. They looked upon the Arabian physicians of the Middle

Age, on Avicenna and Averrhoes, as modern innovators, and derived their

parentage from certain mythic doctors of Cordova, who, when the Moors

were expelled from Spain in the eighth century, fled to Montpellier,

bringing with them traditions of that primeval science which had been

revealed to Adam while still in Paradise; and founded Montpellier, the

mother of all the universities in Europe. Nay, some went further still,

and told of Bengessaus and Ferragius, the physicians of Charlemagne, and

of Marilephus, chief physician of King Chilperic, and even--if a letter

of St. Bernard's was to be believed--of a certain bishop who went as

early as the second century to consult the doctors of Montpellier; and it

would have been in vain to reply to them that in those days, and long

after them, Montpellier was not yet built. The facts are said to be:

that as early as the beginning of the thirteenth century Montpellier had

its schools of law, medicine, and arts, which were erected into a

university by Pope Nicholas IV. in 1289.

The university of Montpellier, like--I believe--most foreign ones,

resembled more a Scotch than an English university. The students lived,

for the most part, not in colleges, but in private lodgings, and

constituted a republic of their own, ruled by an abbe of the scholars,

one of themselves, chosen by universal suffrage. A terror they were

often to the respectable burghers, for they had all the right to carry

arms; and a plague likewise, for, if they ran in debt, their creditors

were forbidden to seize their books, which, with their swords, were

generally all the property they possessed. If, moreover, any one set up

a noisy or unpleasant trade near their lodgings, the scholars could

compel the town authorities to turn him out. They were most of them,

probably, mere boys of from twelve to twenty, living poorly, working

hard, and--those at least of them who were in the colleges--cruelly

beaten daily, after the fashion of those times; but they seem to have

comforted themselves under their troubles by a good deal of wild life out

of school, by rambling into the country on the festivals of the saints,

and now and then by acting plays; notably, that famous one which Rabelais

wrote for them in 1531: "The moral comedy of the man who had a dumb

wife;" which "joyous patelinage" remains unto this day in the shape of a

well-known comic song. That comedy young Rondelet must have seen acted.

The son of a druggist, spicer, and grocer--the three trades were then

combined--in Montpellier, and born in 1507, he had been destined for the

cloister, being a sickly lad. His uncle, one of the canons of

Maguelonne, near by, had even given him the revenues of a small chapel--a

job of nepotism which was common enough in those days. But his heart was

in science and medicine. He set off, still a mere boy, to Paris to study

there; and returned to Montpellier, at the age of eighteen, to study

again.

The next year, 1530, while still a scholar himself, he was appointed

procurator of the scholars--a post which brought him in a small fee on

each matriculation--and that year he took a fee, among others, from one

of the most remarkable men of that or of any age, Francois Rabelais

himself.

And what shall I say of him?--who stands alone, like Shakespeare, in his

generation; possessed of colossal learning--of all science which could be

gathered in his days--of practical and statesmanlike wisdom--of knowledge

of languages, ancient and modern, beyond all his compeers--of eloquence,

which when he speaks of pure and noble things becomes heroic, and, as it

were, inspired--of scorn for meanness, hypocrisy, ignorance--of esteem,

genuine and earnest, for the Holy Scriptures, and for the more moderate

of the Reformers who were spreading the Scriptures in Europe,--and all

this great light wilfully hidden, not under a bushel, but under a

dunghill. He is somewhat like Socrates in face, and in character

likewise; in him, as in Socrates, the demigod and the satyr, the man and

the ape, are struggling for the mastery. In Socrates, the true man

conquers, and comes forth high and pure; in Rabelais, alas! the victor is

the ape, while the man himself sinks down in cynicism, sensuality,

practical jokes, foul talk. He returns to Paris, to live an idle,

luxurious life; to die--says the legend--saying, "I go to seek a great

perhaps," and to leave behind him little save a school of

Pantagruelists--careless young gentlemen, whose ideal was to laugh at

everything, to believe in nothing, and to gratify their five senses like

the brutes which perish. There are those who read his books to make them

laugh; the wise man, when he reads them, will be far more inclined to

weep. Let any young man who may see these words remember, that in him,

as in Rabelais, the ape and the man are struggling for the mastery. Let

him take warning by the fate of one who was to him as a giant to a pigmy;

and think of Tennyson's words:--

"Arise, and fly

The reeling faun, the sensual feast;

Strive upwards, working out the beast,

And let the ape and tiger die."

But to return. Down among them there at Montpellier, like a brilliant

meteor, flashed this wonderful Rabelais, in the year 1530. He had fled,

some say, for his life. Like Erasmus, he had no mind to be a martyr, and

he had been terrified at the execution of poor Louis de Berquin, his

friend, and the friend of Erasmus likewise. This Louis de Berquin, a man

well known in those days, was a gallant young gentleman and scholar,

holding a place in the court of Francis I., who had translated into

French the works of Erasmus, Luther, and Melancthon, and had asserted

that it was heretical to invoke the Virgin Mary instead of the Holy

Spirit, or to call her our Hope and our Life, which titles--Berquin

averred--belonged alone to God. Twice had the doctors of the Sorbonne,

with that terrible persecutor, Noel Beda, at their head, seized poor

Berquin, and tried to burn his books and him; twice had that angel in

human form, Marguerite d'Angouleme, sister of Francis I., saved him from

their clutches; but when Francis--taken prisoner at the battle of

Pavia--at last returned from his captivity in Spain, the suppression of

heresy and the burning of heretics seemed to him and to his mother,

Louise of Savoy, a thank-offering so acceptable to God, that Louis

Berquin--who would not, in spite of the entreaties of Erasmus, purchase

his life by silence--was burnt at last on the Place de Greve, being first

strangled, because he was of gentle blood.

Montpellier received its famous guest joyfully. Rabelais was now forty-

two years old, and a distinguished savant; so they excused him his three

years' undergraduate's career, and invested him at once with the red gown

of the bachelors. That red gown--or, rather, the ragged phantom of it--is

still shown at Montpellier, and must be worn by each bachelor when he

takes his degree. Unfortunately, antiquarians assure us that the

precious garment has been renewed again and again--the students having

clipped bits of it away for relics, and clipped as earnestly from the new

gowns as their predecessors had done from the authentic original.

Doubtless the coming of such a man among them to lecture on the Aphorisms

of Hippocrates, and the Ars Parva of Galen, not from the Latin

translations then in use, "but from original Greek texts, with comments

and corrections of his own, must have had a great influence on the minds

of the Montpellier students; and still more influence--and that not

altogether a good one--must Rabelais' lighter talk have had, as he

lounged--so the story goes--in his dressing-gown upon the public place,

picking up quaint stories from the cattle-drivers off the Cevennes, and

the villagers who came in to sell their olives and their grapes, their

vinegar and their vine-twig faggots, as they do unto this day. To him

may be owing much of the sound respect for natural science, and much,

too, of the contempt for the superstition around them, which is notable

in that group of great naturalists who were boys in Montpellier at that

day. Rabelais seems to have liked Rondelet, and no wonder: he was a

cheery, lovable, honest little fellow, very fond of jokes, a great

musician and player on the violin, and who, when he grew rich, liked

nothing so well as to bring into his house any buffoon or strolling

player to make fun for him. Vivacious he was, hot-tempered, forgiving,

and with a power of learning and a power of work which were prodigious,

even in those hard-working days. Rabelais chaffs Rondelet, under the

name of Rondibilis; for, indeed, Rondelet grew up into a very round, fat,

little man; but Rabelais puts excellent sense into his mouth, cynical

enough, and too cynical, but both learned and humorous; and, if he laughs

at him for being shocked at the offer of a fee, and taking it,

nevertheless, kindly enough, Rondelet is not the first doctor who has

done that, neither will he be the last.

Rondelet, in his turn, put on the red robe of the bachelor, and received,

on taking his degree, his due share of fisticuffs from his dearest

friends, according to the ancient custom of the University of

Montpellier. He then went off to practise medicine in a village at the

foot of the Alps, and, half-starved, to teach little children. Then he

found he must learn Greek; went off to Paris a second time, and

alleviated his poverty there somewhat by becoming tutor to a son of the

Viscomte de Turenne. There he met Gonthier of Andernach, who had taught

anatomy at Louvain to the great Vesalius, and learned from him to

dissect. We next find him setting up as a medical man amid the wild

volcanic hills of the Auvergne, struggling still with poverty, like

Erasmus, like George Buchanan, like almost every great scholar in those

days; for students then had to wander from place to place, generally on

foot, in search of new teachers, in search of books, in search of the

necessaries of life; undergoing such an amount of bodily and mental toil

as makes it wonderful that all of them did not--as some of them doubtless

did--die under the hard training, or, at best, desert the penurious Muses

for the paternal shop or plough.

Rondelet got his doctorate in 1537, and next year fell in love with and

married a beautiful young girl called Jeanne Sandre, who seems to have

been as poor as he.

But he had gained, meanwhile, a powerful patron and the patronage of the

great was then as necessary to men of letters as the patronage of the

public is now. Guillaume Pellicier, Bishop of Maguelonne--or rather then

of Montpellier itself, whither he had persuaded Paul II. to transfer the

ancient see--was a model of the literary gentleman of the sixteenth

century; a savant, a diplomat, a collector of books and manuscripts,

Greek, Hebrew, and Syriac, which formed the original nucleus of the

present library of the Louvre; a botanist, too, who loved to wander with

Rondelet collecting plants and flowers. He retired from public life to

peace and science at Montpellier, when to the evil days of his master,

Francis I., succeeded the still worse days of Henry II., and Diana of

Poitiers. That Jezebel of France could conceive no more natural or easy

way of atoning for her own sins than that of hunting down heretics, and

feasting her wicked eyes--so it is said--upon their dying torments.

Bishop Pellicier fell under suspicion of heresy: very probably with some

justice. He fell, too, under suspicion of leading a life unworthy of a

celibate churchman, a fault which--if it really existed--was, in those

days, pardonable enough in an orthodox prelate, but not so in one whose

orthodoxy was suspected. And for a while Pellicier was in prison. After

his release he gave himself up to science, with Rondelet, and the school

of disciples who were growing up around him. They rediscovered together

the Garum, that classic sauce, whose praises had been sung of old by

Horace, Martial, and Ausonius; and so childlike, superstitious if you

will, was the reverence in the sixteenth century for classic antiquity,

that when Pellicier and Rondelet discovered that the Garum was made from

the fish called Picarel--called Garon by the fishers of Antibes, and

Giroli at Venice, both these last names corruptions of the Latin

Gerres--then did the two fashionable poets of France, Etienne Dolet and

Clement Marot, think it not unworthy of their muse to sing the praises of

the sauce which Horace had sung of old. A proud day, too, was it for

Pellicier and Rondelet, when wandering somewhere in the marshes of the

Camargue, a scent of garlic caught the nostrils of the gentle bishop, and

in the lovely pink flowers of the water-germander he recognised the

Scordium of the ancients. "The discovery," says Professor Planchon,

"made almost as much noise as that of the famous Garum; for at that

moment of naive fervour on behalf of antiquity, to rediscover a plant of

Dioscorides or of Pliny was a good fortune and almost an event."

I know not whether, after his death, the good bishop's bones reposed

beneath some gorgeous tomb, bedizened with the incongruous half-Pagan

statues of the Renaissance: but this, at least, is certain, that

Rondelet's disciples imagined for him a monument more enduring than of

marble or of brass, more graceful and more curiously wrought than all the

sculptures of Torrigiano or Cellini, Baccio Bandinelli or Michael Angelo

himself. For they named a lovely little lilac snapdragon, _Linaria

Domini Pellicerii_,--"Lord Pellicier's toad-flax;" and that name it will

keep, we may believe, as long as winter and summer shall endure.

But to return. To this good patron--who was the Ambassador at Venice--the

newly-married Rondelet determined to apply for employment; and to Venice

he would have gone, leaving his bride behind, had he not been stayed by

one of those angels who sometimes walk the earth in women's shape. Jeanne

Sandre had an elder sister, Catherine, who had brought her up. She was

married to a wealthy man, but she had no children of her own. For four

years she and her good husband had let the Rondelets lodge with them, and

now she was a widow, and to part with them was more than she could bear.

She carried Rondelet off from the students who were seeing him safe out

of the city, brought him back, settled on him the same day half her

fortune, and soon after settled on him the whole, on the sole condition

that she should live with him and her sister. For years afterwards she

watched over the pretty young wife and her two girls and three boys--the

three boys, alas! all died young--and over Rondelet himself, who,

immersed in books and experiments, was utterly careless about money; and

was to them all a mother, advising, guiding, managing, and regarded by

Rondelet with genuine gratitude as his guardian angel.

Honour and good fortune, in the worldly sense, now poured in upon the

druggist's son. Pellicier, his own bishop, stood godfather to his first-

born daughter. Montluc, Bishop of Valence, and that wise and learned

statesman, the Cardinal of Tournon, stood godfathers a few years later to

his twin boys; and what was of still more solid worth to him, Cardinal

Tournon took him to Antwerp, Bordeaux, Bayonne, and more than once to

Rome; and in these Italian journeys of his he collected many facts for

the great work of his life, that 'History of Fishes' which he dedicated,

naturally enough, to the cardinal. This book with its plates is, for the

time, a masterpiece of accuracy. Those who are best acquainted with the

subject say, that it is up to the present day a key to the whole

ichthyology of the Mediterranean. Two other men, Belon and Salviani,

were then at work on the same subject, and published their books almost

at the same time; a circumstance which caused, as was natural, a three-

cornered duel between the supporters of the three naturalists, each party

accusing the other of plagiarism. The simple fact seems to be that the

almost simultaneous appearance of the three books in 1554-5 is one of

those coincidences inevitable at moments when many minds are stirred in

the same direction by the same great thoughts--coincidences which have

happened in our own day on questions of geology, biology, and astronomy;

and which, when the facts have been carefully examined, and the first

flush of natural jealousy has cooled down, have proved only that there

were more wise men than one in the world at the same time.

And this sixteenth century was an age in which the minds of men were

suddenly and strangely turned to examine the wonders of nature with an

earnestness, with a reverence, and therefore with an accuracy, with which

they had never been investigated before. "Nature," says Professor

Planchon, "long veiled in mysticism and scholasticism, was opening up

infinite vistas. A new superstition, the exaggerated worship of the

ancients, was nearly hindering this movement of thought towards facts.

Nevertheless learning did her work. She rediscovered, reconstructed,

purified, commented on the texts of ancient authors. Then came in

observation, which showed that more was to be seen in one blade of grass

than in any page of Pliny. Rondelet was in the middle of this crisis a

man of transition, while he was one of progress. He reflected the past;

he opened and prepared the future. If he commented on Dioscorides, if he

remained faithful to the theories of Galen, he founded in his 'History of

Fishes' a monument which our century respects. He is above all an

inspirer, an initiator; and if he wants one mark of the leader of a

school, the foundation of certain scientific doctrines, there is in his

speech what is better than all systems, the communicative power which

urges a generation of disciples along the path of independent research,

with Reason for guide, and Faith for aim."

Around Rondelet, in those years, sometimes indeed in his house--for

professors in those days took private pupils as lodgers--worked the group

of botanists whom Linnaeus calls "the Fathers," the authors of the

descriptive botany of the sixteenth century. Their names, and those of

their disciples and their disciples again, are household words in the

mouth of every gardener, immortalised, like good Bishop Pellicier, in the

plants which have been named after them. The Lobelia commemorates Lobel,

one of Rondelet's most famous pupils, who wrote those 'Adversaria' which

contain so many curious sketches of Rondelet's botanical expeditions, and

who inherited his botanical (as Joubert his biographer inherited his

anatomical) manuscripts. The Magnolia commemorates the Magnols; the

Sarracenia, Sarrasin of Lyons; the Bauhinia, Jean Bauhin; the Fuchsia,

Bauhin's earlier German master, Leonard Fuchs; and the Clusia--the

received name of that terrible "Matapalo," or "Scotch attorney," of the

West Indies, which kills the hugest tree, to become as huge a tree

itself--immortalizes the great Clusius, Charles de l'Escluse, citizen of

Arras, who after studying civil law at Louvain, philosophy at Marburg,

and theology at Wittemberg under Melancthon, came to Montpellier in 1551,

to live in Rondelet's own house, and become the greatest botanist of his

age.

These were Rondelet's palmy days. He had got a theatre of anatomy built

at Montpellier, where he himself dissected publicly. He had, says

tradition, a little botanic garden, such as were springing up then in

several universities, specially in Italy. He had a villa outside the

city, whose tower, near the modern railway station, still bears the name

of the "Mas de Rondelet." There, too, may be seen the remnants of the

great tanks, fed with water brought through earthen pipes from the

Fountain of Albe, wherein he kept the fish whose habits he observed.

Professor Planchon thinks that he had salt-water tanks likewise; and thus

he may have been the father of all "Aquariums." He had a large and

handsome house in the city itself, a large practice as physician in the

country round; money flowed in fast to him, and flowed out fast likewise.

He spent much upon building, pulling down, rebuilding, and sent the bills

in seemingly to his wife and to his guardian angel Catherine. He himself

had never a penny in his purse: but earned the money, and let his ladies

spend it; an equitable and pleasant division of labour which most married

men would do well to imitate. A generous, affectionate, careless little

man, he gave away, says his pupil and biographer, Joubert, his valuable

specimens to any savant who begged for them, or left them about to be

stolen by visitors, who, like too many collectors in all ages, possessed

light fingers and lighter consciences. So pacific was he meanwhile, and

so brave withal, that even in the fearful years of the troubles, he would

never carry sword, nor even tuck or dagger; but went about on the most

lonesome journeys as one who wore a charmed life, secure in God and in

his calling, which was to heal, and not to kill.

These were the golden years of Rondelet's life; but trouble was coming on

him, and a stormy sunset after a brilliant day. He lost his sister-in-

law, to whom he owed all his fortunes, and who had watched ever since

over him and his wife like a mother; then he lost his wife herself under

most painful circumstances; then his best-beloved daughter. Then he

married again, and lost the son who was born to him; and then came, as to

many of the best in those days, even sorer trials, trials of the

conscience, trials of faith.

For in the mean time Rondelet had become a Protestant, like many of the

wisest men round him; like, so it would seem from the event, the majority

of the university and the burghers of Montpellier. It is not to be

wondered at. Montpellier was a sort of half-way resting-place for

Protestant preachers, whether fugitive or not, who were passing from

Basle, Geneva, or Lyons, to Marguerite of Navarre's little Protestant

court at Pau or at Nerac, where all wise and good men, and now and then

some foolish and fanatical ones, found shelter and hospitality. Thither

Calvin himself had been, passing probably through Montpellier, and

leaving--as such a man was sure to leave--the mark of his foot behind

him. At Lyons, no great distance up the Rhone, Marguerite had helped to

establish an organised Protestant community; and when in 1536 she herself

had passed through Montpellier, to visit her brother at Valence, and

Montmorency's camp at Avignon, she took with her doubtless Protestant

chaplains of her own, who spoke wise words--it may be that she spoke wise

words herself--to the ardent and inquiring students of Montpellier.

Moreover, Rondelet and his disciples had been for years past in constant

communication with the Protestant savants of Switzerland and Germany,

among whom the knowledge of nature was progressing as it never had

progressed before. For--it is a fact always to be remembered--it was

only in the free air of Protestant countries the natural sciences could

grow and thrive. They sprung up, indeed, in Italy after the restoration

of Greek literature in the fifteenth century; but they withered there

again only too soon under the blighting upas shade of superstition.

Transplanted to the free air of Switzerland, of Germany, of Britain, and

of Montpellier, then half Protestant, they developed rapidly and surely,

simply because the air was free; to be checked again in France by the

return of superstition with despotism super-added, until the eve of the

great French Revolution.

So Rondelet had been for some years Protestant. He had hidden in his

house for a long while a monk who had left his monastery. He had himself

written theological treatises: but when his Bishop Pellicier was

imprisoned on a charge of heresy, Rondelet burnt his manuscripts, and

kept his opinions to himself. Still he was a suspected heretic, at last

seemingly a notorious one; for only the year before his death, going to

visit patients at Perpignan, he was waylaid by the Spaniards, and had to

get home through bypasses of the Pyrenees, to avoid being thrown into the

Inquisition.

And those were times in which it was necessary for a man to be careful,

unless he had made up his mind to be burned. For more than thirty years

of Rondelet's life the burning had gone on in his neighbourhood;

intermittently it is true: the spasms of superstitious fury being

succeeded, one may charitably hope, by pity and remorse: but still the

burnings had gone on. The Benedictine monk of St. Maur, who writes the

history of Languedoc, says, quite _en passant_, how some one was burnt at

Toulouse in 1553, luckily only in effigy, for he had escaped to Geneva:

but he adds, "next year they burned several heretics," it being not worth

while to mention their names. In 1556 they burned alive at Toulouse Jean

Escalle, a poor Franciscan monk, who had found his order intolerable;

while one Pierre de Lavaur, who dared preach Calvinism in the streets of

Nismes, was hanged and burnt. So had the score of judicial murders been

increasing year by year, till it had to be, as all evil scores have to be

in this world, paid off with interest, and paid off especially against

the ignorant and fanatic monks who for a whole generation, in every

university and school in France, had been howling down sound science, as

well as sound religion; and at Montpellier in 1560-1, their debt was paid

them in a very ugly way. News came down to the hot southerners of

Languedoc of the so-called conspiracy of Amboise.--How the Duc de Guise

and the Cardinal de Lorraine had butchered the best blood in France under

the pretence of a treasonable plot; how the King of Navarre and the

Prince de Conde had been arrested; then how Conde and Coligny were ready

to take up arms at the head of all the Huguenots of France, and try to

stop this lifelong torturing, by sharp shot and cold steel; then how in

six months' time the king would assemble a general council to settle the

question between Catholics and Huguenots. The Huguenots, guessing how

that would end, resolved to settle the question for themselves. They

rose in one city after another, sacked the churches, destroyed the

images, put down by main force superstitious processions and dances; and

did many things only to be excused by the exasperation caused by thirty

years of cruelty. At Montpellier there was hard fighting, murders--so

say the Catholic historians--of priests and monks, sack of the new

cathedral, destruction of the noble convents which lay in a ring round

Montpellier. The city and the university were in the hands of the

Huguenots, and Montpellier became Protestant on the spot.

Next year came the counter blow. There were heavy battles with the

Catholics all round the neighbourhood, destruction of the suburbs,

threatened siege and sack, and years of misery and poverty for

Montpellier and all who were therein.

Horrible was the state of France in those times of the wars of religion

which began in 1562; the times which are spoken of usually as "The

Troubles," as if men did not wish to allude to them too openly. Then,

and afterwards in the wars of the League, deeds were done for which

language has no name. The population decreased. The land lay untilled.

The fair face of France was blackened with burnt homesteads and ruined

towns. Ghastly corpses dangled in rows upon the trees, or floated down

the blood-stained streams. Law and order were at an end. Bands of

robbers prowled in open day, and bands of wolves likewise. But all

through the horrors of the troubles we catch sight of the little fat

doctor riding all unarmed to see his patients throughout Languedoc; going

vast distances, his biographers say, by means of regular relays of

horses, till he too broke down. Well for him, perhaps, that he broke

down when he did; for capture and recapture, massacre and pestilence,

were the fate of Montpellier and the surrounding country, till the better

times of Henry IV. and the Edict of Nantes in 1598, when liberty of

worship was given to the Protestants for a while.

In the burning summer of 1566 Rondeletius went a long journey to

Toulouse, seemingly upon an errand of charity, to settle some law affairs

for his relations. The sanitary state of the southern cities is bad

enough still. It must have been horrible in those days of barbarism and

misrule. Dysentery was epidemic at Toulouse then, and Rondelet took it.

He knew from the first that he should die. He was worn out, it is said,

by over-exertion; by sorrow for the miseries of the land; by fruitless

struggles to keep the peace, and to strive for moderation in days when

men were all immoderate. But he rode away a day's journey--he took two

days over it, so weak he was--in the blazing July sun, to a friend's sick

wife at Realmont, and there took to his bed, and died a good man's death.

The details of his death and last illness were written and published by

his cousin Claude Formy; and well worth reading they are to any man who

wishes to know how to die. Rondelet would have no tidings of his illness

sent to Montpellier. He was happy, he said, in dying away from the tears

of his household, and "safe from insult." He dreaded, one may suppose,

lest priests and friars should force their way to his bedside, and try to

extort some recantation from the great savant, the honour and glory of

their city. So they sent for no priest to Realmont: but round his bed a

knot of Calvinist gentlemen and ministers read the Scriptures, and sang

David's psalms, and prayed; and Rondelet prayed with them through long

agonies, and so went home to God.

The Benedictine monk-historian of Languedoc, in all his voluminous

folios, never mentions, as far as I can find, Rondelet's existence. Why

should he? The man was only a druggist's son and a heretic, who healed

diseases, and collected plants, and wrote a book on fish. But the

learned men of Montpellier, and of all Europe, had a very different

opinion of him. His body was buried at Realmont: but before the schools

of Toulouse they set up a white marble slab, and an inscription thereon

setting forth his learning and his virtues; and epitaphs on him were

composed by the learned throughout Europe, not only in French and Latin,

but in Greek, Hebrew, and even Chaldee.

So lived and so died a noble man; more noble--to my mind--than many a

victorious warrior, or successful statesman, or canonised saint. To know

facts, and to heal diseases, were the two objects of his life. For them

he toiled, as few men have toiled; and he died in harness, at his

work--the best death any man can die.

Health and Education · 第 17 / 19 题