So I might have said to him, but did not--

And then men pray for rain:

My boy, did you ever hear the old Eastern legend about the Gipsies? How

they were such good musicians, that some great Indian Sultan sent for the

whole tribe, and planted them near his palace, and gave them land, and

ploughs to break it up, and seed to sow it, that they might dwell there,

and play and sing to him.

But when the winter arrived, the Gipsies all came to the Sultan, and

cried that they were starving. "But what have you done with the seed-

corn which I gave you?" "O Light of the Age, we ate it in the summer."

"And what have you done with the ploughs which I gave you?" "O Glory of

the Universe, we burnt them to bake the corn withal."

Then said that great Sultan--"Like the butterflies you have lived; and

like the butterflies you shall wander." So he drove them out. And that

is how the Gipsies came hither from the East.

Now suppose that the Sultan of all Sultans, who sends the rain, should

make a like answer to us foolish human beings, when we prayed for rain:

"But what have you done with the rain which I gave you six months since?"

"We have let it run into the sea." "Then, ere you ask for more rain,

make places wherein you can keep it when you have it." "But that would

be, in most cases, too expensive. We can employ our capital more

profitably in other directions."

It is not for me to say what answer might be made to such an excuse. I

think a child's still unsophisticated sense of right and wrong would soon

supply one; and probably one--considering the complexity, and difficulty,

and novelty, of the whole question--somewhat too harsh; as children's

judgments are wont to be.

But would it not be well if our children, without being taught to blame

anyone for what is past, were taught something about what ought to be

done now, what must be done soon, with the rainfall of these islands; and

about other and kindred health-questions, on the solution of which

depends, and will depend more and more, the life of millions? One would

have thought that those public schools and colleges which desire to

monopolise the education of the owners of the soil; of the great

employers of labour; of the clergy; and of all, indeed, who ought to be

acquainted with the duties of property, the conditions of public health,

and, in a word, with the general laws of what is now called Social

Science--one would have thought, I say, that these public schools and

colleges would have taught their scholars somewhat at least about such

matters, that they might go forth into life with at least some rough

notions of the causes which make people healthy or unhealthy, rich or

poor, comfortable or wretched, useful or dangerous to the State. But as

long as our great educational institutions, safe, or fancying themselves

safe, in some enchanted castle, shut out by ancient magic from the living

world, put a premium on Latin and Greek verses: a wise father will,

during the holidays, talk now and then, I hope, somewhat after this

fashion:--

You must understand, my boy, that all the water in the country comes out

of the sky, and from nowhere else; and that, therefore, to save and store

the water when it falls is a question of life and death to crops, and

man, and beast; for with or without water is life or death. If I took,

for instance, the water from the moors above and turned it over yonder

field, I could double, and more than double, the crops in that field

henceforth.

Then why do I not do it?

Only because the field lies higher than the house; and if--now here is

one thing which you and every civilised man should know--if you have

water-meadows, or any "irrigated" land, as it is called, above a house,

or even on a level with it, it is certain to breed not merely cold and

damp, but fever or ague. Our forefathers did not understand this; and

they built their houses, as this is built, in the lowest places they

could find: sometimes because they wished to be near ponds, from whence

they could get fish in Lent; but more often, I think, because they wanted

to be sheltered from the wind. They had no glass, as we have, in their

windows; or, at least, only latticed casements, which let in the wind and

cold; and they shrank from high and exposed, and therefore really

healthy, spots. But now that we have good glass, and sash windows, and

doors that will shut tight, we can build warm houses where we like. And

if you ever have to do with the building of cottages, remember that it is

your duty to the people who will live in them, and therefore to the

State, to see that they stand high and dry, where no water can drain down

into their foundations, and where fog, and the poisonous gases which are

given out by rotting vegetables, cannot drain down either. You will

learn more about all that when you learn, as every civilised lad should

in these days, something about chemistry, and the laws of fluids and

gases. But you know already that flowers are cut off by frost in the low

grounds sooner than in the high; and that the fog at night always lies

along the brooks; and that the sour moor-smell which warns us to shut our

windows at sunset, comes down from the hill, and not up from the valley.

Now all these things are caused by one and the same law; that cold air is

heavier than warm; and, therefore, like so much water, must run down

hill.

But what about the rainfall?

Well, I have wandered a little from the rainfall: though not as far as

you fancy; for fever and ague and rheumatism usually mean--rain in the

wrong place. But if you knew how much illness, and torturing pain, and

death, and sorrow arise, even to this very day, from ignorance of these

simple laws, then you would bear them carefully in mind, and wish to know

more about them. But now for water being life to the beasts. Do you

remember--though you are hardly old enough--the cattle-plague? How the

beasts died, or had to be killed and buried, by tens of thousands; and

how misery and ruin fell on hundreds of honest men and women over many of

the richest counties of England: but how we in this vale had no cattle-

plague; and how there was none--as far as I recollect--in the uplands of

Devon and Cornwall, nor of Wales, nor of the Scotch Highlands? Now, do

you know why that was? Simply because we here, like those other

uplanders, are in such a country as Palestine was before the foolish Jews

cut down all their timber, and so destroyed their own rainfall--a "land

of brooks of water, of fountains and depths that spring out of valleys

and hills." There is hardly a field here that has not, thank God, its

running brook, or its sweet spring, from which our cattle were drinking

their health and life, while in the clay-lands of Cheshire, and in the

Cambridgeshire fens--which were drained utterly dry--the poor things

drank no water, too often, save that of the very same putrid ponds in

which they had been standing all day long, to cool themselves, and to

keep off the flies. I do not say, of course, that bad water caused the

cattle-plague. It came by infection from the East of Europe. But I say

that bad water made the cattle ready to take it, and made it spread over

the country; and when you are old enough I will give you plenty of

proof--some from the herds of your own kinsmen--that what I say is true.

And as for pure water being life to human beings: why have we never fever

here, and scarcely ever diseases like fever--zymotics, as the doctors

call them? Or, if a case comes into our parish from outside, why does

the fever never spread? For the very same reason that we had no cattle-

plague. Because we have more pure water close to every cottage than we

need. And this I tell you: that the only two outbreaks of deadly disease

which we have had here for thirty years, were both of them, as far as I

could see, to be traced to filthy water having got into the poor folk's

wells. Water, you must remember, just as it is life when pure, is death

when foul. For it can carry, unseen to the eye, and even when it looks

clear and sparkling, and tastes soft and sweet, poisons which have

perhaps killed more human beings than ever were killed in battle. You

have read, perhaps, how the Athenians, when they were dying of the

plague, accused the Lacedaemonians outside the walls of poisoning their

wells; or how, in some of the pestilences of the middle ages, the common

people used to accuse the poor harmless Jews of poisoning the wells, and

set upon them and murdered them horribly. They were right, I do not

doubt, in their notion that the well-water was giving them the

pestilence: but they had not sense to see that they were poisoning the

wells themselves by their dirt and carelessness; or, in the case of poor

besieged Athens, probably by mere overcrowding, which has cost many a

life ere now, and will cost more. And I am sorry to tell you, my little

man, that even now too many people have no more sense than they had, and

die in consequence. If you could see a battle-field, and men shot down,

writhing and dying in hundreds by shell and bullet, would not that seem

to you a horrid sight? Then--I do not wish to make you sad too early,

but this is a fact which everyone should know--that more people, and not

strong men only, but women and little children too, are killed and

wounded in Great Britain every year by bad water and want of water

together, than were killed and wounded in any battle which has been

fought since you were born. Medical men know this well. And when you

are older, you may see it for yourself in the Registrar-General's

reports, blue-books, pamphlets, and so on, without end.

But why do not people stop such a horrible loss of life?

Well, my dear boy, the true causes of it have only been known for the

last thirty or forty years; and we English are, as good King Alfred found

us to his sorrow a thousand years ago, very slow to move, even when we

see a thing ought to be done. Let us hope that in this matter--we have

been so in most matters as yet--we shall be like the tortoise in the

fable, and not the hare; and by moving slowly, but surely, win the race

at last. But now think for yourself: and see what you would do to save

these people from being poisoned by bad water. Remember that the plain

question is this--The rainwater comes down from heaven as water, and

nothing but water. Rainwater is the only pure water, after all. How

would you save that for the poor people who have none? There; run away

and hunt rabbits on the moor: but look, meanwhile, how you would save

some of this beautiful and precious water which is roaring away into the

sea.

* * * * *

Well? What would you do? Make ponds, you say, like the old monks'

ponds, now all broken down. Dam all the glens across their mouths, and

turn them into reservoirs.

"Out of the mouths of babes and sucklings"--Well, that will have to be

done. That is being done more and more, more or less well. The good

people of Glasgow did it first, I think; and now the good people of

Manchester, and of other northern towns, have done it, and have saved

many a human life thereby already. But it must be done, some day, all

over England and Wales, and great part of Scotland. For the mountain

tops and moors, my boy, by a beautiful law of nature, compensate for

their own poverty by yielding a wealth which the rich lowlands cannot

yield. You do not understand? Then see. Yon moor above can grow

neither corn nor grass. But one thing it can grow, and does grow,

without which we should have no corn nor grass, and that is--water. Not

only does far more rain fall up there than falls here down below, but

even in drought the high moors condense the moisture into dew, and so

yield some water, even when the lowlands are burnt up with drought. The

reason of that you must learn hereafter. That it is so, you should know

yourself. For on the high chalk downs, you know, where farmers make a

sheep-pond, they never, if they are wise, make it in a valley or on a

hill-side, but on the bleakest top of the very highest down; and there,

if they can once get it filled with snow and rain in winter, the blessed

dews of night will keep some water in it all the summer through, while

the ponds below are utterly dried up. And even so it is, as I know, with

this very moor. Corn and grass it will not grow, because there is too

little "staple," that is, soluble minerals, in the sandy soil. But how

much water it might grow, you may judge roughly for yourself, by

remembering how many brooks like this are running off it now to carry

mere dirt into the river, and then into the sea.

But why should we not make dams at once; and save the water?

Because we cannot afford it. No one would buy the water when we had

stored it. The rich in town and country will always take care--and quite

right they are--to have water enough for themselves, and for their

servants too, whatever it may cost them. But the poorer people are--and

therefore usually, alas! the more ignorant--the less water they get; and

the less they care to have water; and the less they are inclined to pay

for it; and the more, I am sorry to say, they waste what little they do

get; and I am still more sorry to say, spoil, and even steal and sell--in

London at least--the stop-cocks and lead-pipes which bring the water into

their houses. So that keeping a water-shop is a very troublesome and

uncertain business; and one which is not likely to pay us or any one

round here.

But why not let some company manage it, as they manage railways, and gas,

and other things?

Ah--you have been overhearing a good deal about companies of late, I see.

But this I will tell you; that when you grow up, and have a vote and

influence, it will be your duty, if you intend to be a good citizen, not

only not to put the water-supply of England into the hands of fresh

companies, but to help to take out of their hands what water-supply they

manage already, especially in London; and likewise the gas-supply; and

the railroads; and everything else, in a word, which everybody uses, and

must use. For you must understand--at least as soon as you can--that

though the men who make up companies are no worse than other men, and

some of them, as you ought to know, very good men; yet what they have to

look to is their profits; and the less water they supply, and the worse

it is, the more profit they make. For most water, I am sorry to say, is

fouled before the water companies can get to it, as this water which runs

past us will be, and as the Thames water above London is. Therefore it

has to be cleansed, or partly cleansed, at a very great expense. So

water companies have to be inspected--in plain English, watched--at a

very heavy expense to the nation, by government officers; and compelled

to do their best, and take their utmost care. And so it has come to pass

that the London water is not now nearly as bad as some of it was thirty

years ago, when it was no more fit to drink than that in the cattle yard

tank. But still we must have more water, and better, in London; for it

is growing year by year. There are more than three millions of people

already in what we call London; and ere you are an old man there may be

between four and five millions. Now to supply all these people with

water is a duty which we must not leave to any private companies. It

must be done by a public authority, as is fit and proper in a free self-

governing country. In this matter, as in all others, we will try to do

what the Royal Commission told us four years ago we ought to do. I hope

that you will see, though I may not, the day when what we call London,

but which is really, nine-tenths of it, only a great nest of separate

villages huddled together, will be divided into three great

self-governing cities, London, Westminster, and Southwark; each with its

own corporation, like that of the venerable and well-governed City of

London; each managing its own water-supply, gas-supply, and sewage, and

other matters besides; and managing them, like Dublin, Glasgow,

Manchester, Liverpool, and other great northern towns, far more cheaply

and far better than any companies can do it for them.

But where shall we get water enough for all these millions of people?

There are no mountains near London. But we might give them the water off

our moors.

No, no, my boy.

"He that will not when he may,

When he will, he shall have nay."

Some fifteen years ago the Londoners might have had water from us; and I

was one of those who did my best to get it for them: but the water

companies did not choose to take it; and now this part of England is

growing so populous and so valuable that it wants all its little rainfall

for itself. So there is another leaf torn out of the Sibylline books for

the poor old water companies. You do not understand: you will some day.

But you may comfort yourself about London. For it happens to be, I

think, the luckiest city in the world; and if it had not been, we should

have had pestilence on pestilence in it, as terrible as the great plague

of Charles II.'s time. The old Britons, without knowing in the least

what they were doing, settled old London city in the very centre of the

most wonderful natural reservoir in this island, or perhaps in all

Europe; which reaches from Kent into Wiltshire, and round again into

Suffolk; and that is, the dear old chalk downs.

Why, they are always dry.

Yes. But the turf on them never burns up, and the streams which flow

through them never run dry, and seldom or never flood either. Do you not

know, from Winchester, that that is true? Then where is all the rain and

snow gone, which falls on them year by year, but into the chalk itself,

and into the greensands, too, below the chalk? There it is, soaked up as

by a sponge, in quantity incalculable; enough, some think, to supply

London, let it grow as huge as it may. I wish I too were sure of that.

But the Commission has shown itself so wise and fair, and brave

likewise--too brave, I am sorry to say, for some who might have supported

them--that it is not for me to gainsay their opinion.

But if there was not water enough in the chalk, are not the Londoners

rich enough to bring it from any distance?

My boy, in this also we will agree with the Commission--that we ought not

to rob Peter to pay Paul, and take water to a distance which other people

close at hand may want. Look at the map of England and southern

Scotland; and see for yourself what is just, according to geography and

nature. There are four mountain-ranges; four great water-fields. First,

the hills of the Border. Their rainfall ought to be stored for the

Lothians and the extreme north of England. Then the Yorkshire and

Derbyshire hills--the central chine of England. Their rainfall is being

stored already, to the honour of the shrewd northern men, for the

manufacturing counties east and west of the hills. Then come the lake

mountains--the finest water-field of all, because more rain by far falls

there than in any place in England. But they will be wanted to supply

Lancashire, and some day Liverpool itself; for Liverpool is now using

rain which belongs more justly to other towns; and besides, there are

plenty of counties and towns, down into Cheshire, which would be glad of

what water Lancashire does not want. And last come the Snowdon

mountains, a noble water-field, which I know well; for an old dream of

mine has been, that ere I died I should see all the rain of the Carnedds,

and the Glyders, and Siabod, and Snowdon itself, carried across the

Conway river to feed the mining districts of North Wales, where the

streams are now all foul with oil and lead; and then on into the western

coal and iron fields, to Wolverhampton and Birmingham itself: and if I

were the engineer who got that done, I should be happier--prouder I dare

not say--than if I had painted nobler pictures than Raffaelle, or written

nobler plays than Shakespeare. I say that, boy, in most deliberate

earnest. But meanwhile, do you not see that in districts where coal and

iron may be found, and fresh manufactures may spring up any day in any

place, each district has a right to claim the nearest rainfall for

itself? And now, when we have got the water into its proper place, let

us see what we shall do with it.

But why do you say we? Can you and I do all this?

My boy, are not you and I free citizens; part of the people, the

Commons--as the good old word runs--of this country? And are we not--or

ought we not to be in time--beside that, educated men? By the people,

remember, I mean, not only the hand-working man who has just got a vote;

I mean the clergy of all denominations; and the gentlemen of the press;

and last, but not least, the scientific men. If those four classes

together were to tell every government--"Free water we will have, and as

much as we reasonably choose;" and tell every candidate for the House of

Commons,--"Unless you promise to get us as much free water as we

reasonably choose, we will not return you to Parliament:" then, I think,

we four should put such a "pressure" on government as no water companies,

or other vested interests, could long resist. And if any of those four

classes should hang back, and waste their time and influence over matters

far less important and less pressing, the other three must laugh at them,

and more than laugh at them; and ask them--"Why have you education, why

have you influence, why have you votes, why are you freemen and not

slaves, if not to preserve the comfort, the decency, the health, the

lives of men, women, and children--most of those latter your own wives

and your own children?"

But what shall we do with the water?

Well, after all, that is a more practical matter than speculations

grounded on the supposition that all classes will do their duty. But the

first thing we will do will be to give to the very poorest houses a

constant supply, at high pressure; so that everybody may take as much

water as he likes, instead of having to keep the water in little

cisterns, where it gets foul and putrid only too often.

But will they not waste it then?

So far from it, wherever the water has been laid on at high pressure, the

waste, which is terrible now--some say that in London one-third of the

water is wasted--begins to lessen; and both water and expense are saved.

If you will only think, you will see one reason why. If a woman leaves a

high-pressure tap running, she will flood her place and her neighbour's

too. She will be like the magician's servant, who called up the demon to

draw water for him; and so he did: but when he had begun he would not

stop, and if the magician had not come home, man and house would have

been washed away.

But if it saves money, why do not the water companies do it?

Because--and really here there are many excuses for the poor old water

companies, when so many of them swerve and gib at the very mention of

constant water-supply, like a poor horse set to draw a load which he

feels is too heavy for him--because, to keep everything in order among

dirty, careless, and often drunken people, there must be officers with

lawful authority--water-policemen we will call them--who can enter

people's houses when they will, and if they find anything wrong with the

water, set it to rights with a high hand, and even summon the people who

have set it wrong. And that is a power which, in a free country, must

never be given to the servants of any private company, but only to the

officers of a corporation or of the government.

And what shall we do with the rest of the water?

Well, we shall have, I believe, so much to spare that we may at least do

this--In each district of each city, and the centre of each town, we may

build public baths and lavatories, where poor men and women may get their

warm baths when they will; for now they usually never bathe at all,

because they will not--and ought not, if they be hard-worked folk--bathe

in cold water during nine months of the year. And there they shall wash

their clothes, and dry them by steam; instead of washing them as now, at

home, either under back sheds, where they catch cold and rheumatism, or

too often, alas! in their own living rooms, in an atmosphere of foul

vapour, which drives the father to the public-house and the children into

the streets; and which not only prevents the clothes from being

thoroughly dried again, but is, my dear boy, as you will know when you

are older, a very hot-bed of disease. And they shall have other

comforts, and even luxuries, these public lavatories; and be made, in

time, graceful and refining, as well as merely useful. Nay, we will

even, I think, have in front of each of them a real fountain; not like

the drinking-fountains--though they are great and needful boons--which

you see here and there about the streets, with a tiny dribble of water to

a great deal of expensive stone: but real fountains, which shall leap,

and sparkle, and plash, and gurgle; and fill the place with life, and

light, and coolness; and sing in the people's ears the sweetest of all

earthly songs--save the song of a mother over her child--the song of "The

Laughing Water."

But will not that be a waste?

Yes, my boy. And for that very reason, I think we, the people, will have

our fountains; if it be but to make our governments, and corporations,

and all public bodies and officers, remember that they all--save Her

Majesty the Queen--are our servants; and not we theirs; and that we

choose to have water, not only to wash with, but to play with, if we

like. And I believe--for the world, as you will find, is full not only

of just but of generous souls--that if the water-supply were set really

right, there would be found, in many a city, many a generous man who,

over and above his compulsory water-rate, would give his poor

fellow-townsmen such a real fountain as those which ennoble the great

square at Carcasonne and the great square at Nismes; to be "a thing of

beauty and a joy for ever."

And now, if you want to go back to your Latin and Greek, you shall

translate for me into Latin--I do not expect you to do it into Greek,

though it would turn very well into Greek, for the Greeks knew all about

the matter long before the Romans--what follows here; and you shall

verify the facts and the names, &c., in it from your dictionaries of

antiquity and biography, that you may remember all the better what it

says. And by that time, I think, you will have learnt something more

useful to yourself, and, I hope, to your country hereafter, than if you

had learnt to patch together the neatest Greek and Latin verses which

have appeared since the days of Mr. Canning.

* * * * *

I have often amused myself, by fancying one question which an old Roman

emperor would ask, were he to rise from his grave and visit the sights of

London under the guidance of some minister of state. The august shade

would, doubtless, admire, our railroads and bridges, our cathedrals and

our public parks, and much more of which we need not be ashamed. But

after a while, I think, he would look round, whether in London or in most

of our great cities, inquiringly and in vain, for one class of buildings,

which in his empire were wont to be almost as conspicuous and as

splendid, because, in public opinion, almost as necessary, as the

basilicas and temples--"And where," he would ask, "are your public

baths?" And if the minister of state who was his guide should answer--"O

great Caesar, I really do not know. I believe there are some somewhere

at the back of that ugly building which we call the National Gallery; and

I think there have been some meetings lately in the East End, and an

amateur concert at the Albert Hall, for restoring, by private

subscriptions, some baths and wash-houses in Bethnal Green, which had

fallen to decay. And there may be two or three more about the

metropolis; for parish vestries have powers by Act of Parliament to

establish such places, if they think fit, and choose to pay for them out

of the rates:"--Then, I think, the august shade might well make

answer--"We used to call you, in old Rome, northern barbarians. It seems

that you have not lost all your barbarian habits. Are you aware that, in

every city in the Roman empire, there were, as a matter of course, public

baths open, not only to the poorest freeman, but to the slave, usually

for the payment of the smallest current coin, and often gratuitously? Are

you aware that in Rome itself, millionaire after millionaire, emperor

after emperor, from Menenius Agrippa and Nero down to Diocletian and

Constantine, built baths, and yet more baths; and connected with them

gymnasia for exercise, lecture-rooms, libraries, and porticos, wherein

the people might have shade and shelter, and rest?--I remark, by-the-by,

that I have not seen in all your London a single covered place in which

the people may take shelter during a shower--Are you aware that these

baths were of the most magnificent architecture, decorated with marbles,

paintings, sculptures, fountains, what not? And yet I had heard, in

Hades down below, that you prided yourselves here on the study of the

learned languages; and, indeed, taught little but Greek and Latin at your

public schools?"

Then, if the minister should make reply--"Oh yes, we know all this. Even

since the revival of letters in the end of the fifteenth century a whole

literature has been written--a great deal of it, I fear, by pedants who

seldom washed even their hands and faces--about your Greek and Roman

baths. We visit their colossal ruins in Italy and elsewhere with awe and

admiration; and the discovery of a new Roman bath in any old city of our

isles sets all our antiquaries buzzing with interest."

"Then why," the shade might ask, "do you not copy an example which you so

much admire? Surely England must be much in want, either of water, or of

fuel to heat it with?"

"On the contrary, our rainfall is almost too great; our soil so damp that

we have had to invent a whole art of subsoil drainage unknown to you;

while, as for fuel, our coal-mines make us the great fuel-exporting

people of the world."

What a quiet sneer might curl the lip of a Constantine as he replied--"Not

in vain, as I said, did we call you, some fifteen hundred years ago, the

barbarians of the north. But tell me, good barbarian, whom I know to be

both brave and wise--for the fame of your young British empire has

reached us even in the realms below, and we recognise in you, with all

respect, a people more like us Romans than any which has appeared on

earth for many centuries--how is it you have forgotten that sacred duty

of keeping the people clean, which you surely at one time learnt from us?

When your ancestors entered our armies, and rose, some of them, to be

great generals, and even emperors, like those two Teuton peasants, Justin

and Justinian, who, long after my days, reigned in my own Constantinople:

then, at least, you saw baths, and used them; and felt, after the bath,

that you were civilised men, and not 'sordidi ac foetentes,' as we used

to call you when fresh out of your bullock-waggons and cattle-pens. How

is it that you have forgotten that lesson?"

The minister, I fear, would have to answer that our ancestors were

barbarous enough, not only to destroy the Roman cities, and temples, and

basilicas, and statues, but the Roman baths likewise; and then retired,

each man to his own freehold in the country, to live a life not much more

cleanly or more graceful than that of the swine which were his favourite

food. But he would have a right to plead, as an excuse, that not only in

England, but throughout the whole of the conquered Latin empire, the

Latin priesthood, who, in some respects, were--to their honour--the

representatives of Roman civilisation and the protectors of its remnants,

were the determined enemies of its cleanliness; that they looked on

personal dirt--like the old hermits of the Thebaid--as a sign of

sanctity; and discouraged--as they are said to do still in some of the

Romance countries of Europe--the use of the bath, as not only luxurious,

but also indecent.

At which answer, it seems to me, another sneer might curl the lip of the

august shade, as he said to himself--"This, at least, I did not expect,

when I made Christianity the state religion of my empire. But you, good

barbarian, look clean enough. You do not look on dirt as a sign of

sanctity?"

"On the contrary, sire, the upper classes of our empire boast of being

the cleanliest--perhaps the only perfectly cleanly--people in the world:

except, of course, the savages of the South Seas. And dirt is so far

from being a thing which we admire, that our scientific men--than whom

the world has never seen wiser--have proved to us, for a whole generation

past, that dirt is the fertile cause of disease and drunkenness, misery

and recklessness."

"And, therefore," replies the shade, ere he disappears, "of discontent

and revolution; followed by a tyranny endured, as in Rome and many

another place, by men once free; because tyranny will at least do for

them what they are too lazy, and cowardly, and greedy to do for

themselves. Farewell, and prosper; as you seem likely to prosper, on the

whole. But if you wish me to consider you a civilised nation: let me

hear that you have brought a great river from the depths of the earth, be

they a thousand fathoms deep, or from your nearest mountains, be they

five hundred miles away; and have washed out London's dirt--and your own

shame. Till then, abstain from judging too harshly a Constantine, or

even a Caracalla; for they, whatever were their sins, built baths, and

kept their people clean. But do your gymnasia--your schools and

universities, teach your youth nought about all this?"

Health and Education · 第 8 / 19 题