Mrs. TAMOR, or EUPHEMIA WILLIAMS, _Philadelphia, February,

THE

FUGITIVE SLAVE LAW

AND

ITS VICTIMS.

AMERICAN ANTI-SLAVERY SOCIETY,

138 NASSAU STREET, NEW YORK.

1856.

ANTI-SLAVERY TRACTS. No. 18.

* * * * *

THE FUGITIVE SLAVE LAW, AND ITS VICTIMS.

* * * * *

The Fugitive Slave Law was enacted by Congress in September, 1850,

received the signature of HOWELL COBB, [of Georgia,] as Speaker of

the House of Representatives, of WILLIAM R. KING, [of Alabama,] as

President of the Senate, and was "approved," September 18th, of that

year, by MILLARD FILLMORE, Acting President of the United States.

The authorship of the Bill is generally ascribed to James M. Mason,

Senator from Virginia. Before proceeding to the principal object of

this tract, it is proper to give a synopsis of the Act itself, which

was well called, by the New York _Evening Post_, "An Act for the

Encouragement of Kidnapping." It is in ten sections.

SYNOPSIS OF THE LAW.

SECTION 1. United States Commissioners "authorized and required to

exercise and discharge all the powers and duties conferred by this

act."

SECT. 2. Commissioners for the Territories to be appointed by the

Superior Court of the same.

SECT. 3. United States Circuit Courts, and Superior Courts of

Territories, required to enlarge the number of Commissioners, "with

a view to afford reasonable facilities to reclaim fugitives from

labor," &c.

SECT. 4. Commissioners put on the same footing with Judges of the

United States Courts, with regard to enforcing the Law and its

penalties.

SECT. 5. United States Marshals and deputy marshals, who may refuse

to act under the Law, to be fined One Thousand dollars, to the use

of the claimant. If a fugitive escape from the custody of the

Marshal, the Marshal to be liable for his full value. Commissioners

authorized to appoint special officers, and to call out the _posse

comitatus_, &c.

SECT. 6. The claimant of any fugitive slave, or his attorney, "may

pursue and reclaim such fugitive person," either by procuring a

warrant from some judge or commissioner, "or by seizing and

arresting such fugitive, where the same can be done without

process;" to take such fugitive before such judge or commissioner,

"whose duty it shall be to hear and determine the case of such

claimant in a summary manner," and, if satisfied of the identity of

the prisoner, to grant a certificate to said claimant to "remove

such fugitive person back to the State or Territory from whence he

or she may have escaped,"--using "such reasonable force or restraint

as may be necessary under the circumstances of the case." "In no

trial or hearing under this act shall the testimony of such alleged

fugitive be admitted in evidence." All molestation of the claimant,

in the removal of his slave, "by any process issued by any court,

judge, magistrate, or other person whomsoever," to be prevented.

SECT. 7. Any person obstructing the arrest of a fugitive, or

attempting his or her rescue, or aiding him or her to escape, or

harboring and concealing a fugitive, knowing him to be such, shall

be subject to a fine of not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to

be imprisoned not exceeding six months, and shall also "forfeit and

pay the sum of one thousand dollars for each fugitive so _lost_."

SECT. 8. Marshals, deputies, clerks, and special officers to receive

usual fees; Commissioners to receive ten dollars, if fugitive is

given up to claimant; otherwise, five dollars; to be paid by

claimant.

SECT. 9. If claimant make affidavit that he fears a rescue of such

fugitive from his possession, the officer making the arrest to

retain him in custody, and "to remove him to the State whence he

fled." Said officer "to employ so many persons as he may deem

necessary." All, while so employed, be paid out of the Treasury of

the United States.

Sect. 10. [This Section provides an additional and wholly distinct

method for the capture of a fugitive; and, it may be added, one of

the loosest and most extraordinary that ever appeared on the pages

of Statute book.] Any person, from whom one held to service or labor

has escaped, upon making "satisfactory proof" of such escape before

any court of record, or judge thereof in vacation--a record of

matter so proved shall be made by such court, or judge, and also a

description of the person escaping, "with such convenient certainty

as may be;"--a copy of which record, duly attested, "being produced

in any other State, Territory, or District," and "being exhibited to

any judge, commissioner, or other officer authorized," &c. "shall be

held and taken to be full and conclusive evidence of the fact of

escape, and that the service or labor of the person escaping is due

to the party in such record mentioned;" when, on satisfactory proof

of identity, "he or she shall be delivered up to the claimant."

"_Provided_, That nothing herein contained shall be construed as

requiring the production of a transcript of such record as evidence

as aforesaid; but in its absence, the claim shall be heard and

determined upon other satisfactory proofs competent in law."

The name of the NORTHERN men who voted for this cruel kidnapping law

should not be forgotten. Until they repent, and do works meet for

repentance, let their names stand high and conspicuous on the roll

of infamy. Let the "slow-moving finger of scorn" point them out,

when they walk among men, and the stings of shame, disappointment,

and remorse continually visit them in secret, till they are forced

to cry, "my punishment is greater than I can bear." As to the

_Southern_ men who voted for the law, they only appeared in their

legitimate character of oppressors of the poor--whom God will repay,

in his own time. The thousand-tongued voices of their brother's

blood cry against them from the ground.

The following is the vote, in the SENATE, on the engrossment of the

bill:--

YEAS,--Atchison, Badger, Barnwell, Bell, Berrien, Butler,

Davis (of Mississippi), Dawson, A.C. DODGE (of Iowa), Downs,

Foote, Houston, Hunter, JONES (of Iowa), King, Mangum, Mason,

Pearce, Rusk, Sebastian, Soulé, Spruance, STURGEON (of

Pennsylvania), Turney, Underwood, Wales, Yulee.--27.

NAYS.--Baldwin, Bradbury, Chase, Cooper, Davis (of

Massachusetts), Dayton, Henry Dodge (of Wisconsin), Greene,

Smith, Upham, Walker, Winthrop.--12.

ABSENT, OR NOT VOTING.--Benton, Borland, _Bright_ of Indiana,

_Clarke_ of Rhode Island, Clay, _Cass_ of Michigan, Clemens,

_Dickinson_ of New York, _Douglas_ of Illinois, _Ewing_ of

Ohio, _Felch_ of Michigan, _Hale_ of New Hampshire, _Hamlin_

of Maine, _Miller_ of New Jersey, Morton, _Norris_ of New

Hampshire, _Phelps_ of Vermont, Pratt, _Seward_ of New York,

_Shields_ of Illinois, _Whitcomb_ of Indiana. [Fifteen

Northern Senators absent from the vote.]

On the final passage of the Bill in the Senate, the yeas and nays

were not taken. _D.S. Dickinson_ of New York, who had been absent

when the vote was taken on the engrossment, spoke in favor of the

bill. Mr. Seward was said to be absent from the city, detained by

ill health.

When the Bill came up in the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, (September

12th,) JAMES THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, got the floor,--doubtless by

a previous understanding with the Speaker,--and addressed the House

in support of the Bill. He closed his remarks by _moving the

previous question_! It was ordered, and thus all opportunity for

reply, and for discussion of the Bill was cut off. The Bill was then

passed to its third reading--equivalent to enactment--by a vote of

109 YEAS, to 75 NAYS; as follows:--

YEAS.

_Maine._--THOMAS J.D. FULLER, of Calais; ELBRIDGE GERRY, of

Waterford; NATHANIEL S. LITTLEFIELD, of Bridgton.

_New Hampshire._--HARRY HIBBARD, of Bath; CHARLES H. PEASLEE,

of Concord.

_Massachusetts._--SAMUEL A. ELIOT, of Boston.

_New York._--HIRAM WALDEN, of Waldensville.

_New Jersey._--ISAAC WILDRICK, of Blairstown.

_Pennsylvania._--MILO M. DIMMICK, of Stroudsburg; JOB MANN,

of Bedford; J.X. MCLANAHAN, of Chambersburg; JOHN ROBBINS,

Jr., of Philadelphia; THOMAS ROSS, of Doylestown; JAMES

THOMPSON, of Erie.

_Ohio._--MOSES HOAGLAND, of Millersburg; JOHN K. MILLER, of

Mount Vernon; JOHN L. TAYLOR, of Chillicothe.

_Michigan._--ALEXANDER W. BUELL, of Detroit.

_Indiana._--NATHANIEL ALBERTSON, of Greenville; WILLIAM J.

BROWN, of Amity; CYRUS L. DUNHAM, of Salem; WILLIS A. GORMAN,

of Bloomington; JOSEPH E. MCDONALD, of Crawfordsville; EDWARD

W. MCGAUGHEY, of Rockville.

_Illinois._--WILLIAM H. BISSELL, of Belleville; THOMAS L.

HARRIS, of Petersburg; JOHN A. MCCLERNAND; WILLIAM A.

RICHARDSON, of Quincy; TIMOTHY R. YOUNG, of Marshall.

_Iowa._--SHEPHERD LEFFLER, of Burlington.

_California._--EDWARD GILBERT.

[All these Northern Traitors called themselves _Democrats_! save

three--_Eliot_ of Massachusetts, _Taylor_ of Ohio, and _McGaughey_

of Indiana, who were Whigs.]

--> Every Representative of a Slaveholding State, who voted at all,

voted YEA. Their names are needless, and are omitted.

NAYS

_Maine._--Otis, Sawtelle, Stetson.

_New Hampshire._--Amos Tuck.

_Vermont._--Hebard, Henry, Meacham.

_Massachusetts._--Allen, Duncan, Fowler, Mann.

_Rhode Island._--Dixon, King.

_Connecticut._--Butler, Booth, Waldo.

_New York._--Alexander, Bennett, Briggs, Burrows, Gott,

Gould, Halloway, Jackson, John A. King, Preston King,

Matteson, McKissock, Nelson, Putnam, Rumsey, Sackett,

Schermerhorn, Schoolcraft, Thurman, Underhill, Silvester.

_New Jersey._--Hay, King.

_Pennsylvania._--Calvin, Chandler, Dickey, Freedley, Hampton,

Howe, Moore, Pitman, Reed, Stevens.

_Ohio._--Cable, Carter, Campbell, M.B. Corwin, Crowell,

Disney, Evans, Giddings, Hunter, Morris, Root, Vinton,

Whittlesey, Wood.

_Michigan._--Bingham, Sprague.

_Indiana._--Fitch, Harlan, Julian, Robinson.

_Illinois._--Baker, Wentworth.

_Wisconsin._--Cole, Doty, Durkee.

_California._--Wright.

ABSENT, OR NOT VOTING.

Andrews, Ashmun (Mass.), Bokee, Brooks, Butler, Casey,

Cleveland (Conn.), Clarke, Conger, Duer, Gilmore, Goodenow,

Grinnell (Mass.), Levin, Nes, Newell, Ogle, Olds, Peck,

Phoenix, Potter, Reynolds, Risley, Rockwell (Mass.), Rose,

Schenck, Spaulding, Strong, Sweetser, Thompson (Iowa), Van

Dyke, White, Wilmot (Penn.) [33--all Northern men.]

[Fifteen Southern Representatives did not vote.]

DANIEL WEBSTER was not a member of the Senate when the vote on the

Fugitive Slave Bill was taken. He had been made Secretary of State,

a short time previous. All, however, will remember the powerful aid

which he gave to the new compromise measures, and among them to the

Fugitive Slave Bill, in his notorious Seventh of March Speech,

[1850.] A few extracts from that Speech will show how heavily the

responsibility of the existence of this law rests upon DANIEL

WEBSTER:--

"I suppose there is to be found no injunction against

that relation [Slavery] between man and man, in the

teachings of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, or of any of his

Apostles."--_Webster's 7th March Speech_, (_Authorized

Edition_,) p. 9.

"One complaint of the South has, in my opinion, just

foundation; and that is, that there has been found at

the North, among individuals and among legislators, a

disinclination to perform, fully, their Constitutional duties

in regard to the return of persons bound to service, who have

escaped into the free States. In that respect, it is my

judgment that the South is right, and the North is wrong."

* * * * "My friend at the head of the Judiciary Committee

[Mr. MASON of Virginia] has a bill on the subject now before

the Senate, with some amendments to it, WHICH I PROPOSE

TO SUPPORT, WITH ALL ITS PROVISIONS, _to the fullest

extent_."--_Idem._ p. 29.

He proceeded to assure the Senate that the North would, on

due consideration, fulfil "their constitutional obligations"

"_with alacrity_." "Therefore, I repeat, sir, that here is a

ground of complaint against the North well founded, which

ought to be removed, which it is now in the power of the

different departments of this Government to remove; which

calls for the enactment of proper laws authorizing the

judicature of this Government, in the several States, to do

all that is necessary for the recapture of fugitive slaves,

and for the restoration of them to those who claim them

Wherever I go, and whenever I speak on the subject, and when

I speak here, I desire to speak to the whole North, I say

that the South has been injured in this respect, and has a

right to complain; and the North has been too careless of

what, I think, the Constitution peremptorily and emphatically

enjoins upon her as a duty."--_Idem._ p. 30.

In a speech in the United States Senate, July 17, 1850, made with an

evident view to calm that Northern feeling which had been aroused

and excited by his 7th of March speech, beyond the power of priest

or politician wholly to subdue, Mr. WEBSTER said there were various

misapprehensions respecting the working of the proposed Fugitive

Slave Bill:--

"The first of these misapprehensions," he said, "is an

exaggerated sense of the actual evil of the reclamation of

fugitive slaves, felt by Massachusetts and the other New

England States. What produced that? The cases do not exist.

There has not been a case within the knowledge of this

generation, in which a man has been taken back from

Massachusetts into slavery by process of law, not one."

* * * * "Not only has there been no case, so far as I can

learn, of the reclamation of a slave by his master, which

ended in taking him back to slavery, in this generation, but

I will add, that, as far as I have been able to go back in my

researches, as far as I have been able to hear and learn, in

all that region there has been no one case of false claim.

* * * _There is no danger of any such violation being

perpetrated."[A]--Webster's Speech on the Compromise Bill, in

the United States Senate, 17th of July, 1850, edition of

Gideon & Co., Washington_, pp. 23-25.

[Footnote A: See also Mr. Webster's letter to the Citizens of

Newburyport, dated May 15th, 1850, wherein he urges the same

point, with great pains of argument.]

With such words did Mr. Webster endeavor to allay Northern alarm,

and to create the impression (which was created and which prevailed

extensively with his friends) that the Fugitive Law was only a

concession to Southern feeling, and that few or no attempts to

enforce it were likely to be made.

But when a few months had proved him a false prophet, and the

Southern chase after fugitive men, women, and children had become

hot and fierce, and in one or two instances the hunter had been

foiled in his attempts and had lost his prey, Mr. Webster changed

his tone, as follows:--

In May, 1851, at Syracuse, N.Y., he said: "Depend upon it,

the Law [the Fugitive Slave Law] will be executed in its

spirit and to its letter. It will be executed in all the

great cities--here in Syracuse, in the midst of the next

Anti-Slavery Convention, if the occasion shall arise."

Certainly, so far as in Mr. Webster lay, so far as was in the power

of Mr. Fillmore, and the officers of the United States Government

generally, and of the still larger crowd of _expectants_ of office,

nothing was left undone to introduce the tactics, discipline, and

customs of the Southern plantation into our Northern cities and

towns, in order to enforce the Fugitive Law.

* * * * *

The remainder of this Tract will be devoted to a record, as complete

as circumstances enable us to make, of the VICTIMS OF THE FUGITIVE

SLAVE LAW. It is a terrible record, which the people of this country

should never allow to sleep in oblivion, until the disgraceful and

bloody system of Slavery is swept from our land, and with it, all

Compromise Bills, all Constitutional Guarantees to Slavery, all

Fugitive Slave Laws. The established and accredited newspapers

of the day, without reference to party distinctions, are the

authorities relied upon in making up this record, and the _dates_

being given with each case, the reader is enabled to verify the

same, and the few particulars which the compass of the Tract allows

to be given with each. With all the effort which has been made to

secure a good degree of completeness and exactness, the present

record must of necessity be an imperfect one, and fall short of

exhibiting all the enormities of the Act in question.

JAMES HAMLET, _of New York, September, 1850_, was the first

victim. He was surrendered by United States Commissioner

Gardiner to the agent of one Mary Brown, of Baltimore, who

claimed him as her slave. He was taken to Baltimore. An

effort was immediately made to purchase his freedom, and in

the existing state of the public feeling, the sum demanded by

his mistress, $800, was quickly raised. Hamlet was brought

back to New York with great rejoicings.

_Near Bedford, Penn., October 1._ Ten fugitives, from

Virginia, were attacked in Pennsylvania--one mortally

wounded, another dangerously. Next morning, both were

captured. Five others entered a mountain hut, and begged

relief. The woman supplied their wants. Her husband went out,

procured assistance, captured the slaves, and received a

reward of $255.

_Harrisburg, Penn., October._ Some slaves, number not

stated, were brought before Commissioner M'Allister, when

"the property was proven, and they were delivered to their

masters, who took them back to Virginia, by railroad, without

molestation."

_Detroit, 8th October._ A negro was arrested under the new

law, and sent to jail for a week, to await evidence. Great

numbers of colored people armed themselves to rescue him.

Result not known.

HENRY GARNETT, _Philadelphia_, arrested as the slave of

Thomas P. Jones, of Cecil County, Maryland, and taken before

Judge Grier, of the United States Supreme Court, October 18,

1850, who declared his determination to execute the law as he

found it. The Judge said that the claimant had not taken the

course prescribed by the fugitive act, and proceeded to

explain, in a detailed manner, what the course should be in

such cases. As the claimant thus failed to make out his case,

the prisoner was ordered to be discharged.

_Boston, about 25th October._ Attempt to seize WILLIAM and

ELLEN CRAFT. William Craft armed himself, and kept within

his shop. Ellen was concealed in the house of a friend.

Their claimants, named Hughes & Knight, were indicted for

defamation of character, in calling W.C. a slave, and brought

before a magistrate. The feeling excited against them was so

great, that they at length fled from the city. Shortly after,

it being considered hazardous for Mr. and Mrs. Craft to

remain in the country, they were enabled to escape to

England.

[In a letter, dated Macon, Georgia, Nov. 11, John Knight

gives a particular account of the proceedings and experiences

of himself and his friend Hughes, on their then recent visit

to Boston for the purpose, to quote his own language, "of

re-capturing William and Ellen Craft, the negroes belonging

to Dr. Collins and Ira Taylor." Willis H. Hughes also

published his statement.]

_New Albany, Indiana._ A woman and boy given up, and taken to

Louisville. They were so white that, even in Kentucky, a

strong feeling arose in their favor on that ground. They were

finally bought for $600, and set free.

ADAM GIBSON, _Philadelphia, December 21, 1850_. Surrendered

by Edward D. Ingraham, United States Commissioner. The case

was hurried through in indecent haste, testimony being

admitted against him of the most groundless character. One

witness swore that Gibson's name was Emery Rice. He was taken

to Elkton, Maryland. There, Mr. William S. Knight, his

supposed owner, refused to receive Gibson, saying he was not

the man, and he was taken back to Philadelphia.

What compensation has the United States Government ever made to Adam

Gibson, for the injurious act of its agent, Ingraham? Had not the

Slaveholder been more honorable than the Commissioner or the makers

of the Fugitive Law, Gibson would have been in Slavery for life.

HENRY LONG, _New York, December, 1850_. Brought before

Commissioner Charles M. Hall, claimed as the fugitive slave

of John T. Smith of Russell County, Virginia. After five or

six days' proceedings, there being some doubt of the

Commissioner's legal right to act, the alleged fugitive,

Long, was taken before Judge Judson, District Judge of the

United States. The Castle Garden Union Safety Committee

retained Mr. George Wood in this case, as counsel for the

slave claimant. Long was surrendered by Judge Judson, and

taken to Richmond, Virginia. Judge J. was complimented by the

_Washington Union_ as "a clear-headed, competent, and

independent officer, who has borne himself with equal

discretion, liberality, and firmness. Such judges as he,"

continues the _Union_, "are invaluable in these times of

turmoil and agitation." At Richmond, Long was advertised to

be sold at public auction. On Saturday, January 18th, he was

sold, amid the jeers and scoffs of the spectators, for $750,

to David Clapton, of Georgia. The auctioneers (Pullam &

Slade), in commencing, said there was one condition of the

sale. Bonds must be given by the purchaser that this man

shall be carried South, and that he shall be kept South, and

sold, if sold again, to go South; and they declared their

intention to see the terms fully complied with. Long was

subsequently advertised for sale at Atlanta, Georgia.

_Near Coatsville, Chester County, Penn._ On a writ issued by

Commissioner Ingraham, Deputy Marshal Halzell and other

officers, with the claimant of an alleged fugitive, at night,

knocked at the door of a colored family, and asked for a

light to enable them to mend their broken harness. The door

being opened for this purpose, the marshal's party rushed in,

and said they came to arrest a fugitive slave. Resistance was

made by the occupant of the house and others, and the

marshal's party finally driven off--the slave owner advising

that course, and saying, "Well, if this is a specimen of the

pluck of Pennsylvania negroes, I don't want my slaves back."

The master of the house was severely wounded in the arm by a

pistol shot; still he maintained his ground, declaring the

marshal's party should not pass except by first taking his

life.

_Marion, Williamson County, Ill., about December 10, 1850._

Mr. O'Havre, of the city police, Memphis, Tennessee, arrested

and took back to Memphis a fugitive slave, belonging to Dr.

Young. He did so, as the Memphis paper states, only "after

much difficulty and heavy expense, being strongly opposed by

the Free Soilers and Abolitionists, but was assisted by Mr.

W. Allen, member of Congress, and other gentlemen."

_Philadelphia, about January 10, 1851._ G.F. Alberti and

others seized, under the Fugitive Slave Law, a free colored

boy, named JOEL THOMPSON, alleging that he was a slave. The

boy was saved.

STEPHEN BENNETT, _Columbia, Penn._, arrested as the slave of

Edward B. Gallup, of Baltimore. Taken before Commissioner

Ingraham; thence, by _habeas corpus_, before Judge Kane. He

was saved only by his freedom being purchased by his friends.

_The Huntsville (Ala.) Advocate_, of January 1, 1851, said

that Messrs. Markwood & Chester had brought back "_seven of

their Slaves_" from Michigan.

_The Memphis (Tenn.) Eagle_, of a later date, says that

within a few weeks "at least five fugitive slaves have been

brought back to this city, from free States, with as little

trouble as would be had in recovering stray cows." The same

paper adds, "We occasionally receive letters notifying us

that a slave, said to be the property of some one in this

vicinity, has been lodged in jail in Illinois or Indiana, for

his owner, who will please call, pay charges, and take him

away."

_In Boston, end of January, 1851._ A colored man, lately from

North Carolina, was sought by officers, under Marshal Devens,

aided by a lawyer, named Spencer, provided by the New York

Union Safety Committee. The arrest was not attempted. It was

found that the colored man was too strongly guarded and

protected.

Mrs. TAMOR, or EUPHEMIA WILLIAMS, _Philadelphia, February,

1851_, mother of six children, arrested and brought before

Commissioner Ingraham, as the slave Mahala, belonging to

William T.J. Purnell, of Worcester County, Maryland, admitted

to have been absent since 1829--twenty-two years. Children

all born in Pennsylvania; oldest about seventeen--a girl. Her

husband also in custody, and alleged to be the slave of

another man. Under writ of _habeas corpus_, Mrs. Williams was

taken before Judge Kane, of the United States Circuit Court.

After a full hearing, she was discharged, as not being the

woman alleged.

SHADRACH, _in Boston, February 15, 1851_. Arrested in Taft's

Cornhill Coffee House, by deputies of United States Marshal

Devens, on a warrant issued by George T. Curtis, United

States Commissioner, on the complaint of John Caphart,

attorney of John De Bree, of Norfolk, Va. Seth J. Thomas

appeared as counsel for Caphart. After a brief hearing before

G.T. Curtis, Commissioner, the case was adjourned to the

following Tuesday. Shortly after the adjournment, the

court-room was entered by a body of men, who bore away the

prisoner, Shadrach. After which he was heard of in Montreal,

Canada, having successfully, with the aid of many friends,

escaped the snares of all kidnappers, in and out of Boston.

The acting President, MILLARD FILLMORE, issued his

proclamation, countersigned by DANIEL WEBSTER, Secretary of

State, requiring prosecutions to be commenced against all who

participated in the rescue.

_Shawneetown, Illinois._ A woman was claimed by Mr. Haley,

of Georgia, as his slave; and was delivered up to him by two

Justices of the Peace, (early in 1851.)

_Madison, Indiana._ George W. Mason, of Davies County,

Kentucky, arrested a colored man, named MITCHUM, who, with

his wife and children, lived near Vernon. The case was tried

before a Justice of the Peace, named Basnett, who was

satisfied that Mitchum was Davis's slave, and had left his

service _nineteen years before_. The slave was accordingly

delivered up, and was taken to Kentucky, (Feb. 1851.)

_Clearfield County, Penn., about 20th January, 1851._ A

boy was kidnapped and taken into slavery.--_Mercer (Pa.)

Presbyterian_.

_Near Ripley, Ohio._ A fugitive slave, about January 20,

killed his pursuer. He was afterwards taken and carried back

to slavery.

_Burlington, Lawrence County, Ohio, near the end of February,

1851_, four liberated slaves were kidnapped, re-enslaved, and

sold. Efforts were made to bring the perpetrators of this

nefarious act to punishment, and restore the victims to

freedom.

_At Philadelphia, early in March, 1851_, occurred the case of

the colored woman HELEN or HANNAH, and her son, a child of

tender years. She was taken before a Commissioner, and

thence, by writ of _habeas corpus_, before Judge Kane. An

additional question arose from the fact that the woman would

soon become the mother of another child. Judge Kane decided

that she was the property of John Perdu, of Baltimore,

together with her son, and her unborn child, and they were

all surrendered accordingly, and taken into slavery.

_Pittsburg, March 13, 1851._ RICHARD GARDINER was arrested in

Bridgewater, Beaver County, Pennsylvania, claimed as the

property of Miss R. Byers, of Louisville, Kentucky. Judge

Irwin, of the United States District Court, "remanded the

fugitive back to his owner." He was afterwards bought for

$600, and brought into a free State.

_The Wilmington (Del.) Journal_, in March, 1851, says

kidnapping has become quite frequent in that State; and

speaks of a negro kidnapped in that city, on the previous

Wednesday night, by a man who had been one of the city

watchmen.

THOMAS SIMS, arrested in _Boston_, April 4, 1851, at first on

pretence of a charge of theft. But when he understood it was

as a fugitive from slavery, he drew a knife and wounded one

of the officers. He was taken before Commissioner George T.

Curtis. To guard against a repetition of the Shadrach rescue,

the United States Marshal, Devens, aided by the Mayor (John

P. Bigelow) and City Marshal (Francis Tukey) of Boston,

surrounded the Court House, in Boston, with heavy chains,

guarded it by a strong extra force of police officers, with a

strong body of guards also within the building, where the

fugitive was imprisoned as well as tried. Several military

companies also were called out by the city authorities, and

kept in readiness night and day to act against the people,

should they attempt the deliverance of Sims; Faneuil Hall

itself being turned into barracks for these hirelings of

slavery. Every effort was made by S.E. Sewall, Esq., Hon.

Robert Rantoul, Jr., and Charles G. Loring, Esq., to save

Sims from being returned into slavery, and Boston from the

eternal and ineffaceable disgrace of the act. But in vain.

The omnipotent Slave Power demanded of Boston a victim for

its infernal sacrifices. Millard Fillmore, Daniel Webster,

and their numerous tools, on the Bench, in Commissioners'

seats, and other official stations, or in hopes of gaining

such stations bye and bye, had fallen upon their faces

before the monster idol, and sworn that the victim should

be prepared. Thomas Sims was ordered back to slavery by

Commissioner G.T. Curtis, and was taken from the Court House,

in Boston, early on the morning of April 11th, [1851,] to the

Brig Acorn, lying at the end of Long Wharf, and thence in the

custody of officers, to Savannah, Georgia.

There, after being lodged in jail, and severely and cruelly

whipped, as was reported, he was at length sold, and became

merged and lost in the great multitude of the enslaved

population. The surrender of Sims is said to have cost the

United States Government $10,000; the City of Boston about as

much more; and Mr. Potter, the claimant of Sims, about

$2,400, making a total of some $22,000, directly expended on

the case.

_Vincennes, Indiana, April, 1851._ Four fugitive slaves were

seized, claimed by one Mr. Kirwan, of or near Florence,

Alabama. The magistrate, named Robinson, gave up the

fugitives, and they were taken into slavery.

_In Salisbury Township, Penn., April, 1851_, an elderly man

was kidnapped and carried into Maryland.

_Near Sandy Hill, Chester County, Penn., in March, 1851_, a

very worthy and estimable colored man, named Thomas Hall, was

forcibly seized, his house being broken into by three armed

ruffians, who beat him and his wife with clubs. He was

kidnapped.

MOSES JOHNSON, _Chicago, Illinois_, brought before a United

States Commissioner, discharged as not answering to the

description of the man claimed.

CHARLES WEDLEY, kidnapped from _Pittsburg, Pennsylvania_, and

taken into Maryland. He was found, and brought back.

_Cincinnati, Ohio, June 3, 1851_, an attempt to arrest a

fugitive was made. But a scuffle ensued, in which the man

escaped.

_Cincinnati, Ohio._ About the same time, some slaves, (number

not stated,) belonging to Rev. Mr. Perry and others, of

Covington, Kentucky, were taken in Cincinnati, and carried

back to Kentucky.

_Philadelphia, end of June, 1851_, a colored man was taken

away as a slave, by steamboat. A writ of _Habeas Corpus_ was

got out but the officer could not find the man. This is

probably the same case with that of JESSE WHITMAN, arrested

at Wilkesbarre.

FRANK JACKSON, a free colored man in _Mercer, Penn._, was

taken, early in 1851, by a man named Charles May, into

Virginia, and sold as a slave. He tried to escape, but was

taken and lodged in Fincastle jail, Virginia.

THOMAS SCOTT JOHNSON, free colored man, of _New Bedford_, was

arrested near Portsmouth, Virginia, and was about to be sold

as a slave; but, by the strenuous interposition of Capt.

Card, certificates were obtained from New Bedford, and he was

set at liberty.

ELIZABETH WILLIAMS, _West Chester County, Penn._, delivered

into slavery by Commissioner Jones. (July, 1851.)

DANIEL HAWKINS, of _Lancaster County, Penn._, (July, 1851,)

was brought before Commissioner Ingraham, Philadelphia, and

by him delivered to his claimant, and he was taken into

slavery.

_New Athens, Ohio, July 8, 1851._ Eighteen slaves, who had

escaped from Lewis County, Kentucky, were discovered in

an old building in Adams County, Ohio. Some white men,

professing to be friendly, misled them, and brought them to a

house, where they were imprisoned, bound one by one, and

carried back to Kentucky. [The enactment of the Fugitive

Slave Law is the direct stimulating cause of all these cases

of kidnapping.]

_Buffalo, August, 1851._ Case of DANIEL ----. D. was a cook

on board the steamer "Buckeye State." He was engaged in his

avocation, when Benj. S. Rust, with a warrant from United

States Commissioner H.K. Smith, went on board the boat.

Daniel was called up from below, and as his head appeared

above the deck, Rust struck him a heavy blow, upon the head,

with a large billet of wood, which knocked him back into the

cook-room, where he fell upon the stove and was badly burned.

In this state, he was brought before the Commissioner,

"bleeding profusely at the back, of the head, and at the

nose, and was moreover so stupefied by the assault, that he

fell asleep several times during the brief and very summary

proceedings." For most of the time he was unable to converse

with his counsel, and "sat dozing, with the blood slowly

oozing out of his mouth and nostrils." After a very hurried

form, and mockery of a trial, Daniel was ordered to be

delivered to Rust, the Agent of George H. Moore, of

Louisville, Kentucky. By a writ of _Habeas Corpus_, Daniel

was brought before Judge Coakling, of the United States

Court, at Auburn, who gave a decision that set Daniel at

liberty, and he was immediately hurried by his friends into

Canada. Rust was indicted, in Buffalo, for his brutal assault

on Daniel. It was fully proved; he afterwards plead guilty,

and; was let off with the paltry fine of fifty dollars.

JOHN BOLDING, _arrested in Poughkeepsie, New York_, claimed

as the property of Barret Anderson, of Columbia, S.C. Bolding

was a young man, of good character, recently married, and had

a small tailor's shop in P. He said he was told, when a boy,

that he was the son of a white man. He was tried before

United States Commissioner Nelson, who ordered him to be

delivered up to his claimants, and he was taken quietly from

the city to Columbia, S.C. The sum of $2,000 was raised in

New York, and paid to Bolding's owner, who had consented to

take that sum for him, and Bolding returned to his family in

Poughkeepsie.

_Christiana, Lancaster County, Penn., Sept. 1851._ Edward

Gorsuch, (represented as a very pious member of a Methodist

Church in Baltimore,) with his son Dickinson, accompanied by

the Sheriff of Lancaster County, Pa., and by a Philadelphia

officer named _Henry Kline_, went to Christiana to arrest

certain slaves of his, who, (as he had been privately

informed by a wretch, named Wm. M. Padgett,) were living

there. An attack was made upon the house, the slave-holder

declaring (as was said) that he "would not leave the place

alive without his slaves." "Then," replied one of them, "you

will not leave here alive." Many shots were fired on both

sides, and the slave-hunter, Edward Gorsuch, was killed.

At a subsequent trial, a number of persons (nearly forty)

were committed to take their trial for "treason against

the United States, by levying war against the same, in

resisting by force of arms the execution of the Fugitive

Slave Law." CASTNER HANWAY was of the number. After

suffering imprisonment and being subjected to great loss

of time and heavy expenses, they were all discharged.

_Syracuse, October 1, 1851._ JERRY, claimed as the slave of

John McReynolds, of Marion County, Missouri, was brought to

trial before Commissioner J.F. Sabine. He was rescued by a

large body of men from the officers who had him in custody,

and was next heard of in Canada.

_James R. Lawrence_, a lawyer of Syracuse, acted as counsel

for _James Lear_, attorney of McReynolds.

[N.B. Daniel Webster's prophecy was not fulfilled.]

_Columbia, Penn._, (fall of 1851.) Man named HENRY, arrested

as the slave of Dr. Duvall, of Prince George's County,

Maryland,--taken to _Harrisburg_, before United States

Commissioner McAllister and by him consigned to slavery.

_Judge Denning_, of Illinois, discharged a negro brought

before him as a fugitive slave, on the ground that the

Fugitive Slave Law was unconstitutional.

_Two alleged slaves arrested_ at _Columbia, Penn._, on

warrant of United States Commissioner McAllister,--claimed as

property of W.T. McDermott, of Baltimore. One was carried

into slavery, one escaped. (November, 1851.)

_Near New Philadelphia, Maryland_, a woman, married to a free

colored man, with whom she had lived ten years, was arrested

as the slave of a Mr. Shreve, of Louisville, Kentucky. She

was taken back to Kentucky.

RACHEL PARKER, free colored girl, kidnapped from house of

Joseph S. Miller, West Nottingham, Penn., by the "notorious

Elkton Kidnapper, McCreary," Dec. 31, 1851. Mr. Miller

tracked the kidnappers to Baltimore, and tried to recover the

girl, but in vain. On his way home, he was induced to leave

the cars, and was undoubtedly murdered,--it was supposed in

revenge of the death of Gorsuch at Christiana. Mr. Miller's

body was found suspended from a tree. A suit was brought in

the Circuit Court of Baltimore County, for the freedom of

Rachel Parker, Jan. 1853. Over sixty witnesses, from

Pennsylvania, attended to testify to her being free-born, and

that she was not the person she was claimed to be; although,

in great bodily terror, she had, after her capture, confessed

herself the alleged slave! So complete and strong was the

evidence in her favor, that, after an eight days' trial, the

claimants abandoned the case, and a verdict was rendered for

the freedom of Rachel, and also of her sister, Elizabeth

Parker, who had been previously kidnapped, and conveyed to

New Orleans.

--> McCreary was demanded by Gov. Bigler, of Pennsylvania, to be

delivered up for trial on a charge of kidnapping; but Gov. Lowe, of

Maryland, refused to surrender him. See _Standard_, July 2, 1853.

JAMES TASKER, _New York City_, (Feb. 1852,) arrested through

the treachery of Police Officer Martin, and brought before

United States Commissioner George W. Morton, as the slave of

Jonathan Pinckney, of Maryland. He was given up, and taken

back to slavery.

HORACE PRESTON, arrested in _Williamsburg, New York_, as the

slave of William Reese, of Baltimore, Maryland;--Richard

Busteed, of New York, being Attorney for the slaveholder. He

was brought before United States Commissioner Morton, 1st

April, 1852; for several days previous he had been kept a

prisoner, and his wife knew not what had become of him. He

was given up by the Commissioner, and was carried into

slavery. The same policeman, Martin, (who acted in the case

of James Tasker,) was active in this case; being, doubtless,

the original informant.

Preston was afterwards bought for about $1,200, and brought

back.

_Columbia, Penn._, (end of March, 1852;) a colored man, named

WILLIAM SMITH, was arrested as a fugitive slave in the

lumber yard of Mr. Gottlieb, by Deputy Marshal Snyder, of

Harrisburg, and police officer Ridgeley, of Baltimore, under

a warrant from Commissioner McAllister. Smith endeavored to

escape, when Ridgeley drew a pistol and shot him dead!

Ridgeley was demanded by the Governor of Pennsylvania, of the

Governor of Maryland, and the demand was referred to the

Maryland Legislature.

Hon. J.R. Giddings proposed the erection of a monument to

Smith.

JAMES PHILLIPS, who had resided in _Harrisburg, Penn._, for

fourteen years, was arrested May 24, 1852, as the former

slave of Dennis Hudson, of Culpepper County, Virginia,

afterwards bought by Henry T. Fant, of Fauquier County. He

was brought before United States Commissioner McAllister.

Judge McKinney volunteered his services to defend the alleged

fugitive. The Commissioner, as soon as possible, ordered the

man to be delivered up; and, after fourteen years' liberty,

he was taken back to slavery in Virginia. Afterwards, bought

for $900, and taken back to Harrisburg.

_Wilkesbarre, Penn._, (Summer of 1852.) Mr. Harvey arrested

and fined for shielding a slave.

_Sacramento, California_; a man named Lathrop claimed another

as his slave, and Judge Fry decided that the claim was good,

and ordered the slave to be surrendered. Mr. Lathrop left,

with his slave, for the Atlantic States.

_A beautiful young woman_, nearly white, was pursued by her

owner [and father] to New York, (end of June, 1852.) There a

large reward was offered to a police officer to discover her,

place of residence. It was discovered, and measures taken for

her apprehension; but the alarm had been taken, and she

escaped.

_Sacramento, California_; three men were seized by a Mr.

Perkins, of Mississippi. The Court decided them to be his

property and they were carried back to Mississippi.--_Standard_,

July 29, 1852.

_Petersburg, Penn._ Two fugitives from Alabama slavery were

overtaken, and taken back, September, 1852.

JOHN HENRY WILSON, a lad of fourteen years, kidnapped from

Danville, Pennsylvania, and taken to Baltimore, where he was,

offered for sale to John N. Denning. Kidnappers committed to

jail, October, 1852.

[--> DANIEL WEBSTER, the endorser of the Fugitive Slave Law, died at

Marshfield, Mass., October 24th, 1852, in the very height of the

Law's triumphant operation.]

_LOUISA_, a colored woman, claimed by Mrs. Reese, of San

Francisco, California, was seized by five armed men, and put

on board Steamer Golden Gate, and carried it is not known

whither. The aid of the Law was not invoked. The California

_Christian Advocate_, from which the above is taken, says,

"Two colored men, stewards on the Golden Gate, were sent back

to the States on the last trip under the State Fugitive Law."

_A mulatto woman, in San Francisco_, was ordered to be

delivered to her claimant, T.T. Smith, Jackson Country,

Missouri, by "Justice Shepherd,"--_San Francisco Herald_--in

_Standard_, November 4, 1852.

_Sandusky, Ohio._ Two men, two women, and several children

were arrested and taken from a steamboat just about to leave

for Detroit. Taken before Mayor Follett, by a man who claimed

to be their owner. R.R. Sloane, Esq., was employed as counsel

for the slaves. No one claiming custody of the slaves, or

producing any writs or warrants, Mr. Sloane signified to the

crowd present that there appeared to be no cause for the

detention of the persons. Immediately a rush was made for the

door. A man, who before had been silent, exclaimed, "Here are

the papers--I own the slaves--I'll hold you individually

responsible for their escape." The slaves escaped into

Canada, October, 1852. Mr. Sloane was afterwards prosecuted

for the value of the slaves, and judgment given against him

to the amount of $3,950.

_Thirty slaves_, says the _Maysville_ (Ky.) _Eagle_, "escaped

from Mason and Bracken Counties, a short time ago. Some of

them were captured in Ohio, by their owners, at a distance of

about forty miles from the river." "They brought the captured

slaves home without encountering the least obstacle, or even

an unkind word."--_Standard_, November 4, 1852.

THE LEMMON SLAVES. At New York, eight persons, claimed by

Jonathan Lemmon, of Norfolk, Virginia, as his slaves, were

brought before Judge Paine, November, 1852. It appeared that

they had been brought to New York by their owner, with a view

of taking them to Texas, as his slaves. Mr. Louis Napoleon, a

respectable colored man, of New York, procured a writ of

habeas corpus, under which they were brought before the

court. Their liberation was called for, under the State Law,

not being fugitives, but brought into a free State by their

owner. Said owner appeared, with Henry D. Lapaugh as his

counsel, aided by Mr. Clinton. At their urgent request, the

case was postponed from time to time, when Judge Paine, with

evident reluctance, decreed the freedom of the slaves. E.D.

Culver and John Jay, Esqs., were counsel for the slaves. The

merchants and others of New York subscribed and paid Mr.

Lemmon the sum of $5,280, for loss of his slaves. The New

York _Journal of Commerce_ was very active in raising this

money. The same men were invited to contribute something for

the destitute men, women, and children claimed by Lemmon. The

whole amount given by them all, was two dollars. About one

thousand dollars were raised for them among the better

disposed but less wealthy class.

THOMAS BROWN alias GEORGE BORDLEY, _Philadelphia, November,

1852_, was claimed by one Andrew Pearce, Cecil County,

Maryland. Given up to claimant by Commissioner Ingraham. The

arrest of the man was made by the notorious kidnapper, George

F. Alberti. Mr. Pettit, counsel for the claimant.

[Transcriber's note: The following note is inserted after the

following section but does not refer to any specific reported

incident.]

--> The Slaveholders of Kentucky begin forming associations for

mutual protection against loss of runaway slaves. The preamble of

the plan of association proposed at a meeting at Minerva Kentucky,

held in the winter of 1852-53, is as follows:--"Whereas it has

become absolutely necessary for the slave-owners of Kentucky to take

such steps as will secure their property, we, the citizens of Mass.

and Bracken counties, do recommend," &c. [end note]

RICHARD NEAL, free colored man, kidnapped in Philadelphia and

carried from the city in a carriage towards Maryland. A writ

of _habeas corpus_ was obtained, the kidnappers were

overtaken, and Neal brought back after resistance and various

hindrances. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania discharged him.

February, 1853.

_Ten slaves_, arrested in Indiana, and taken back to

Tennessee, by W. Carney and others. Resistance was

made, and W. Carney "was very badly injured during the

fracas."--_Nashville ----_, March 5, 1853. [Transcribers'

note: ---- substituted for word cut off on original page.]

_Alton, Illinois._ A man claimed to belong to Walter Carrico,

of Warren County, Missouri, was arrested by police officers

from St. Louis. After being lodged in jail in St. Louis he

made his escape, and again went into Illinois. He was

pursued, found, and taken back to St. Louis.--_St. Louis

Republican_, March, 1853.

AMANDA, a slave girl, was brought to St. Louis, from near

Memphis, Tennessee, a year before, by a son of her master,

and by him set free, without his father's consent. After the

father's death, an attempt was made to seize Amanda, and take

her back to Tennessee without trial. This was prevented by

officers, the girl taken from the steamboat Cornelia, and

brought before Levi Davis, United States Commissioner. He

decided in favor of the claimants, (the heirs of the estate,

of course.)--_St. Louis Republican_, March 17, 1853.

The Fugitive Slave Law and Its Victims Anti-Slavery Tracts No. 18 · 第 1 / 5 段