August, 1902

I

“The marriage law of the new dispensation will be: THOU SHALT NOT BE

UNFAITHFUL--TO THYSELF.”

A discreet murmur of approval filled the studio, and through the haze of

cigarette smoke Mrs. Clement Westall, as her husband descended from his

improvised platform, saw him merged in a congratulatory group of ladies.

Westall’s informal talks on “The New Ethics” had drawn about him an

eager following of the mentally unemployed--those who, as he had once

phrased it, liked to have their brain-food cut up for them. The talks

had begun by accident. Westall’s ideas were known to be “advanced,” but

hitherto their advance had not been in the direction of publicity. He

had been, in his wife’s opinion, almost pusillanimously careful not

to let his personal views endanger his professional standing. Of late,

however, he had shown a puzzling tendency to dogmatize, to throw down

the gauntlet, to flaunt his private code in the face of society; and the

relation of the sexes being a topic always sure of an audience, a few

admiring friends had persuaded him to give his after-dinner opinions a

larger circulation by summing them up in a series of talks at the Van

Sideren studio.

The Herbert Van Siderens were a couple who subsisted, socially, on

the fact that they had a studio. Van Sideren’s pictures were chiefly

valuable as accessories to the MISE EN SCÈNE which differentiated his

wife’s “afternoons” from the blighting functions held in long New York

drawing-rooms, and permitted her to offer their friends whiskey-and-soda

instead of tea. Mrs. Van Sideren, for her part, was skilled in making

the most of the kind of atmosphere which a lay-figure and an easel

create; and if at times she found the illusion hard to maintain, and

lost courage to the extent of almost wishing that Herbert could paint,

she promptly overcame such moments of weakness by calling in some fresh

talent, some extraneous re-enforcement of the “artistic” impression. It

was in quest of such aid that she had seized on Westall, coaxing him,

somewhat to his wife’s surprise, into a flattered participation in her

fraud. It was vaguely felt, in the Van Sideren circle, that all the

audacities were artistic, and that a teacher who pronounced marriage

immoral was somehow as distinguished as a painter who depicted

purple grass and a green sky. The Van Sideren set were tired of the

conventional color-scheme in art and conduct.

Julia Westall had long had her own views on the immorality of marriage;

she might indeed have claimed her husband as a disciple. In the early

days of their union she had secretly resented his disinclination to

proclaim himself a follower of the new creed; had been inclined to tax

him with moral cowardice, with a failure to live up to the convictions

for which their marriage was supposed to stand. That was in the

first burst of propagandism, when, womanlike, she wanted to turn her

disobedience into a law. Now she felt differently. She could hardly

account for the change, yet being a woman who never allowed her impulses

to remain unaccounted for, she tried to do so by saying that she did not

care to have the articles of her faith misinterpreted by the vulgar. In

this connection, she was beginning to think that almost every one was

vulgar; certainly there were few to whom she would have cared to intrust

the defence of so esoteric a doctrine. And it was precisely at this

point that Westall, discarding his unspoken principles, had chosen to

descend from the heights of privacy, and stand hawking his convictions

at the street-corner!

It was Una Van Sideren who, on this occasion, unconsciously focussed

upon herself Mrs. Westall’s wandering resentment. In the first place,

the girl had no business to be there. It was “horrid”--Mrs. Westall

found herself slipping back into the old feminine vocabulary--simply

“horrid” to think of a young girl’s being allowed to listen to such

talk. The fact that Una smoked cigarettes and sipped an occasional

cocktail did not in the least tarnish a certain radiant innocency which

made her appear the victim, rather than the accomplice, of her parents’

vulgarities. Julia Westall felt in a hot helpless way that something

ought to be done--that some one ought to speak to the girl’s mother. And

just then Una glided up.

“Oh, Mrs. Westall, how beautiful it was!” Una fixed her with large

limpid eyes. “You believe it all, I suppose?” she asked with seraphic

gravity.

“All--what, my dear child?”

The girl shone on her. “About the higher life--the freer expansion of

the individual--the law of fidelity to one’s self,” she glibly recited.

Mrs. Westall, to her own wonder, blushed a deep and burning blush.

“My dear Una,” she said, “you don’t in the least understand what it’s

all about!”

Miss Van Sideren stared, with a slowly answering blush. “Don’t YOU,

then?” she murmured.

Mrs. Westall laughed. “Not always--or altogether! But I should like some

tea, please.”

Una led her to the corner where innocent beverages were dispensed. As

Julia received her cup she scrutinized the girl more carefully. It was

not such a girlish face, after all--definite lines were forming under

the rosy haze of youth. She reflected that Una must be six-and-twenty,

and wondered why she had not married. A nice stock of ideas she would

have as her dower! If THEY were to be a part of the modern girl’s

trousseau--

Mrs. Westall caught herself up with a start. It was as though some one

else had been speaking--a stranger who had borrowed her own voice: she

felt herself the dupe of some fantastic mental ventriloquism. Concluding

suddenly that the room was stifling and Una’s tea too sweet, she set

down her cup, and looked about for Westall: to meet his eyes had long

been her refuge from every uncertainty. She met them now, but only,

as she felt, in transit; they included her parenthetically in a larger

flight. She followed the flight, and it carried her to a corner to which

Una had withdrawn--one of the palmy nooks to which Mrs. Van Sideren

attributed the success of her Saturdays. Westall, a moment later, had

overtaken his look, and found a place at the girl’s side. She bent

forward, speaking eagerly; he leaned back, listening, with the

depreciatory smile which acted as a filter to flattery, enabling him

to swallow the strongest doses without apparent grossness of appetite.

Julia winced at her own definition of the smile.

On the way home, in the deserted winter dusk, Westall surprised his wife

by a sudden boyish pressure of her arm. “Did I open their eyes a bit?

Did I tell them what you wanted me to?” he asked gaily.

Almost unconsciously, she let her arm slip from his. “What I wanted--?”

“Why, haven’t you--all this time?” She caught the honest wonder of his

tone. “I somehow fancied you’d rather blamed me for not talking more

openly--before-- You’ve made me feel, at times, that I was sacrificing

principles to expediency.”

She paused a moment over her reply; then she asked quietly: “What made

you decide not to--any longer?”

She felt again the vibration of a faint surprise. “Why--the wish to

please you!” he answered, almost too simply.

“I wish you would not go on, then,” she said abruptly.

He stopped in his quick walk, and she felt his stare through the

darkness.

“Not go on--?”

“Call a hansom, please. I’m tired,” broke from her with a sudden rush of

physical weariness.

Instantly his solicitude enveloped her. The room had been infernally

hot--and then that confounded cigarette smoke--he had noticed once or

twice that she looked pale--she mustn’t come to another Saturday. She

felt herself yielding, as she always did, to the warm influence of his

concern for her, the feminine in her leaning on the man in him with a

conscious intensity of abandonment. He put her in the hansom, and her

hand stole into his in the darkness. A tear or two rose, and she let

them fall. It was so delicious to cry over imaginary troubles!

That evening, after dinner, he surprised her by reverting to the subject

of his talk. He combined a man’s dislike of uncomfortable questions

with an almost feminine skill in eluding them; and she knew that if he

returned to the subject he must have some special reason for doing so.

“You seem not to have cared for what I said this afternoon. Did I put

the case badly?”

“No--you put it very well.”

“Then what did you mean by saying that you would rather not have me go

on with it?”

She glanced at him nervously, her ignorance of his intention deepening

her sense of helplessness.

“I don’t think I care to hear such things discussed in public.”

“I don’t understand you,” he exclaimed. Again the feeling that his

surprise was genuine gave an air of obliquity to her own attitude. She

was not sure that she understood herself.

“Won’t you explain?” he said with a tinge of impatience. Her eyes

wandered about the familiar drawing-room which had been the scene of so

many of their evening confidences. The shaded lamps, the quiet-colored

walls hung with mezzotints, the pale spring flowers scattered here and

there in Venice glasses and bowls of old Sèvres, recalled, she hardly

knew why, the apartment in which the evenings of her first marriage had

been passed--a wilderness of rosewood and upholstery, with a picture of

a Roman peasant above the mantel-piece, and a Greek slave in “statuary

marble” between the folding-doors of the back drawing-room. It was a

room with which she had never been able to establish any closer relation

than that between a traveller and a railway station; and now, as

she looked about at the surroundings which stood for her deepest

affinities--the room for which she had left that other room--she was

startled by the same sense of strangeness and unfamiliarity. The prints,

the flowers, the subdued tones of the old porcelains, seemed to typify a

superficial refinement that had no relation to the deeper significances

of life.

Suddenly she heard her husband repeating his question.

“I don’t know that I can explain,” she faltered.

He drew his arm-chair forward so that he faced her across the hearth.

The light of a reading-lamp fell on his finely drawn face, which had

a kind of surface-sensitiveness akin to the surface-refinement of its

setting.

“Is it that you no longer believe in our ideas?” he asked.

“In our ideas--?”

“The ideas I am trying to teach. The ideas you and I are supposed to

stand for.” He paused a moment. “The ideas on which our marriage was

founded.”

The blood rushed to her face. He had his reasons, then--she was sure now

that he had his reasons! In the ten years of their marriage, how

often had either of them stopped to consider the ideas on which it was

founded? How often does a man dig about the basement of his house to

examine its foundation? The foundation is there, of course--the house

rests on it--but one lives abovestairs and not in the cellar. It

was she, indeed, who in the beginning had insisted on reviewing the

situation now and then, on recapitulating the reasons which justified

her course, on proclaiming, from time to time, her adherence to the

religion of personal independence; but she had long ceased to feel

the need of any such ideal standards, and had accepted her marriage as

frankly and naturally as though it had been based on the primitive needs

of the heart, and needed no special sanction to explain or justify it.

“Of course I still believe in our ideas!” she exclaimed.

“Then I repeat that I don’t understand. It was a part of your theory

that the greatest possible publicity should be given to our view of

marriage. Have you changed your mind in that respect?”

She hesitated. “It depends on circumstances--on the public one is

addressing. The set of people that the Van Siderens get about them don’t

care for the truth or falseness of a doctrine. They are attracted simply

by its novelty.”

“And yet it was in just such a set of people that you and I met, and

learned the truth from each other.”

“That was different.”

“In what way?”

“I was not a young girl, to begin with. It is perfectly unfitting that

young girls should be present at--at such times--should hear such things

discussed--”

“I thought you considered it one of the deepest social wrongs that such

things never ARE discussed before young girls; but that is beside

the point, for I don’t remember seeing any young girl in my audience

to-day--”

“Except Una Van Sideren!”

He turned slightly and pushed back the lamp at his elbow.

“Oh, Miss Van Sideren--naturally--”

“Why naturally?”

“The daughter of the house--would you have had her sent out with her

governess?”

“If I had a daughter I should not allow such things to go on in my

house!”

Westall, stroking his mustache, leaned back with a faint smile. “I fancy

Miss Van Sideren is quite capable of taking care of herself.”

“No girl knows how to take care of herself--till it’s too late.”

“And yet you would deliberately deny her the surest means of

self-defence?”

“What do you call the surest means of self-defence?”

“Some preliminary knowledge of human nature in its relation to the

marriage tie.”

She made an impatient gesture. “How should you like to marry that kind

of a girl?”

“Immensely--if she were my kind of girl in other respects.”

She took up the argument at another point.

“You are quite mistaken if you think such talk does not affect young

girls. Una was in a state of the most absurd exaltation--” She broke

off, wondering why she had spoken.

Westall reopened a magazine which he had laid aside at the beginning

of their discussion. “What you tell me is immensely flattering to my

oratorical talent--but I fear you overrate its effect. I can assure you

that Miss Van Sideren doesn’t have to have her thinking done for her.

She’s quite capable of doing it herself.”

“You seem very familiar with her mental processes!” flashed unguardedly

from his wife.

He looked up quietly from the pages he was cutting.

“I should like to be,” he answered. “She interests me.”

The Early Short Fiction of Edith Wharton — Part 2 · 第 33 / 52 题