A {p.25} man by the name of J. M. Smith is suggested by Dr. Peck as

the custodian of the originals. When this gentleman died, the

documents in his care are supposed to have been either lost or

appropriated by parties unknown to the Lemen family. Mr. Joseph B.

Lemen relates that a certain party at one time represented to the

family that he had located the papers and offered, for a suitable

consideration, to recover them. This proved to be merely a scheme to

obtain money under false pretenses.[6] Various other accounts are

current of the disposition of the original papers; but as yet none of

them have been located.

The transcripts of the collection, made by James Lemen, Jr., came into

the hands of his son, Joseph Bowler Lemen, who is responsible for the

publication of various portions of the story, including some of the

letters entire. Even these copies, however, are not accessible at the

present time, except that of the Lemen Diary, as located by the

present writer. Joseph Lemen's account of the fate of the elusive

documents is given in full at the end of this publication. He there

states that every paper of any value was copied and preserved, but

even these copies were dissipated to a large extent. He also claims

that all the facts contained in these documents have been published in

one form or another, "except a very few, including Rev. James Lemen's

interviews with Lincoln, as written up by Mr. Lemen on ten pages of

legal cap paper." This Joseph B. Lemen is now far advanced in years,

has long been a recluse, and has the reputation of being "peculiar."

In a personal interview with him, the present writer could elicit no

further facts regarding the whereabouts of the "Lemen Family Notes."

Nevertheless, the discovery of the copy of the Lemen Diary and the

manuscript of Dr. Peck's "History" gives encouragement to hope for

further discoveries, which should be reported to the Chicago

Historical Society.

DOCUMENTS {p.26}

I. DIARY OF REV. JAMES LEMEN, SR.

Ridge Prairie, Ill. June 4, 1867.

The within notes are a true copy of the notes kept by the Rev. James

Lemen, Sr., when in the siege at Yorktown. The original notes were

fading out.

By his son, REV. JAMES LEMEN, Jr.

* * * * *

Near Yorktown, Va. Sep. 26, 1781.

My enlistment of two years expired some time ago, but I joined my

regiment to-day and will serve in this siege.

Quarters, near Yorktown, Sept. 27, 1781.

I was on one of the French ships to-day with my captain. There is a

great fleet of them to help us, it is said, if we fight soon.

Sept. 30, 1781, Near Yorktown.

Our regiment has orders to move forward this morning, and the main

army is moving.

Near Yorktown. Oct. 3, 1781.

I was detailed with four other soldiers to return an insane British

soldier who had come into our lines, as we don't want such prisoners.

Near Yorktown. Oct. 4, 1781.

I carried a message from my Colonel to Gen. Washington to-day. He

recognized me and talked very kindly and said the war would soon be

over, he thought. I knew Washington before the war commenced.

Near {p.27} Yorktown. Oct. 4, 1781.

I saw Washington and La Fayette looking at a French soldier and an

American soldier wrestling, and the American threw the Frenchman so

hard he limped off, and La Fayette said that was the way Washington

must do to Cornwallis.

Near Yorktown. Oct. 5, 1781.

Brother Robert is sick to-day, but was on duty. There was considerable

firing to-day. There will be a great fight soon.

Near Yorktown. Oct. 15, 1781.

I was in the assault which La Fayette led yesterday evening against

the British redoubt, which we captured. Our loss was nine killed and

thirty-four wounded.

Near Yorktown. Oct. 15, 1781.

Firing was very heavy along our lines on Oct. 9th and 10th. and with

great effect, but this redoubt and another was in our way and we

Americans under La Fayette captured one easily, but the French

soldiers who captured the other suffered heavily. They were also led

by a Frenchman.

Yorktown. Oct. 19, 1781.

Our victory is great and complete. I saw the surrender to-day. Our

officers think this will probably end the war.

* * * * *

Ridge Prairie, Ill. June 4, 1867.

I have examined the within notes and find them to be correct copies of

notes kept by Rev. James Lemen, Sr., which were fading out. He

originally kept his confidential notes, as to his agreement with

Thomas Jefferson, in a private book, but as this is intended for

publication at some future time, they are all copied together.

By his son, REV. JAMES LEMEN, Jr.

Harper's Ferry, Va. Dec. 11, 1782.

[5]Thomas Jefferson had me to visit him again a short time ago, as he

wanted me to go to the Illinois country in the North West, after a

year or two, in order to try to lead and {p.28} direct the new

settlers in the best way and also to oppose the introduction of

slavery in that country at a later day, as I am known as an opponent

of that evil, and he says he will give me some help. It is all because

of his great kindness and affection for me, for which I am very

grateful, but I have not yet fully decided to do so, but have agreed

to consider the case.

Dec. 20, 1782.

During the war, I served a two years' enlistment under Washington. I

do not believe in war except to defend one's country and home and in

this case I was willing to serve as faithfully as I could. After my

enlistment expired I served again in the army in my regiment under

Washington, during the siege of Yorktown, but did not again enlist, as

the officers thought the war would soon end.

May 2, 1784.

[6]I saw Jefferson at Annapolis, Maryland, to-day and had a very

pleasant visit with him. I have consented to go to Illinois on his

mission and he intends helping me some, but I did not ask nor wish it.

We had a full agreement and understanding as to all terms and duties.

The agreement is strictly private between us, but all his purposes are

perfectly honorable and praiseworthy.

Dec. 28, 1785.

Jefferson's confidential agent gave me one hundred dollars of his

funds to use for my family, if need be, and if not to go to good

causes, and I will go to Illinois on his mission next Spring and take

my wife and children.

Sept. 4, 1786.

In the past summer, with my wife and children I arrived at Kaskaskia,

Illinois, and we are now living in the Bottom settlement. On the Ohio

river my boat partly turned over and we lost a part of our goods and

our son Robert came near drowning.

May 10, 1787.

I am very well impressed with this new country, but we are still

living in the Bottom, as the Indians are unsafe. We prefer living on

the high lands and we shall get us a place there soon. People are

coming into this new country in increasing numbers.

New {p.29} Design, Ill. Feb. 26, 1794.

My wife and I were baptized with several others to-day in Fountain

Creek by Rev. Josiah Dodge. The ice had to be cut and removed first.

New Design, May 28, 1796.

Yesterday and to-day, my neighbors at my invitation, gathered at my

home and were constituted into a Baptist church, by Rev. David Badgley

and Joseph Chance.

New Design, Jan. 4, 1797.

We settled here some time ago and are well pleased with our place. It

is more healthy than the Bottom country. A fine sugar grove is near us

and a large lake with fine fish, and soil good, but the Indians are

not yet to be trusted. We have been here now a number of years and

have quite a farm in cultivation and fairly good improvements.

New Design, Jan. 6, 1798.

I have just returned with six of my neighbors from a hunt and land

inspection upon what is called Richland country and creek. We had made

our camp near that creek before. On the first Sunday morning in

December held religious services and on Monday went out to see the

land. We found fine prairie lands some miles north, south and east and

some timber lands along the water streams mostly. Game is plentiful

and we killed several deer and turkeys. It is a fine country.

New Design, May 3, 1803.

As Thomas Jefferson predicted they would do, the extreme southern

slave advocates are making their influence felt in the new territory

for the introduction of slavery and they are pressing Gov. William

Henry Harrison to use his power and influence for that end. Steps must

soon be taken to prevent that curse from being fastened on our people.

New Design, May 4, 1805.

At our last meeting, as I expected he would do, Gov. Harrison asked

and insisted that I should cast my influence for the introduction of

slavery here, but I not only denied the request, but I informed him

that the evil attempt would encounter my most active opposition in

every possible and honorable manner that my mind could suggest or my

means accomplish.

New {p.30} Design, May 10, 1805.

Knowing President Jefferson's hostility against the introduction of

slavery here and the mission he sent me on to oppose it, I do not

believe the pro-slavery petitions with which Gov. Harrison and his

council are pressing Congress for slavery here can prevail while he is

President, as he is very popular with Congress and will find means to

overreach the evil attempt of the pro-slavery power.

Jan. 20th 1806.

[15]As Gov. William Henry Harrison and his legislative council have

had their petitions before Congress at several sessions asking for

slavery here, I sent a messenger to Indiana to ask the churches and

people there to get up and sign a counter petition to Congress to

uphold freedom in the territory and I have circulated one here and we

will send it on to that body at next session or as soon as the work is

done.

New Design. Sept. 10, 1806.

[19]A confidential agent of Aaron Burr called yesterday to ask my aid

and sympathy in Burr's scheme for a Southwestern Empire with Illinois

as a province and an offer to make me governor. But I denounced the

conspiracy as high treason and gave him a few hours to leave the

territory on pain of arrest.

New Design. Jan 10, 1809 [1810].

[20]I received Jefferson's confidential message on Oct. 10, 1808,

suggesting a division of the churches on the question of slavery and

the organization of a church on a strictly anti-slavery basis, for the

purpose of heading a movement to finally make Illinois a free State,

and after first trying in vain for some months to bring all the

churches over to such a basis, I acted on Jefferson's plan and Dec.

10, 1809, the anti-slavery element formed a Baptist church at Cantine

creek, on an anti-slavery basis.

New Design. Mar. 3, 1819.

I was reared in the Presbyterian faith, but at 20 years of age I

embraced Baptist principles and after settlement in Illinois I was

baptized into that faith and finally became a minister of the gospel

of that church, but some years before I was licensed to preach, I was

active in collecting and inducing {p.31} communities to organize

churches, as I thought that the most certain plan to control and

improve the new settlements, and I also hoped to employ the churches

as a means of opposition to the institution of slavery, but this only

became possible when we organized a leading church on a strictly

anti-slavery basis, an event which finally was marked with great

success, as Jefferson suggested it would be.

New Design. Jan 10, 1820.

My six sons all are naturally industrious and they all enjoy the

sports. Robert and Josiah excel in fishing, Moses in hunting, William

in boating and swimming and James and Joseph in running and jumping.

Either one of them can jump over a line held at his own height, a

little over six feet.

New Design. Jan. 12, 1820.

A full account of my Indian fights will be found among my papers.

New Design. Dec. 10, 1820.

Looking back at this time, 1820, to 1809, when we organized the

Canteen creek Baptist Church on a strictly anti-slavery basis as

Jefferson had suggested as a [center] from which the anti-slavery

movement to finally save the State to freedom could be directed, it is

now clear that the move was a wise one as there is no doubt but that

it more than anything else was what made Illinois a free State.

New Design, Ill. Jan. 4, 1821.

Among my papers my family will find a full and connected statement as

to all the churches I have caused to be formed since my settlement in

Illinois.

* * * * *

There were many of our family notes which were faded out and Rev. J.

M. Peck retained some when he made father's history and many were

misplaced by other friends, but we have had all copied [that] are now

in our possession which are of interest.

REV. JAMES LEMEN, Jr.,

(Son of Rev. James Lemen, Sr.).

Ridge Prairie, Ill. June 4, 1867.

My father's account of his Indian fights and statement of all the

churches he caused to be founded in Illinois, above mentioned,

{p.32} were loaned to Rev. John M. Peck a short time before his death

and have not been returned, but the information contained has already

been published except a few confidential facts as to his relations

with Jefferson in the formation of the Canteen Creek Baptist Ch., now

the Bethel Baptist Church.

REV. JAMES LEMEN, Jr.

(Son of James Lemen, Sr.)

II. PECK'S HISTORY OF THE JEFFERSON-LEMEN COMPACT

Rock Spring, Ill., June 4, 1851.

The history of the confidential relation of Rev. James Lemen, Senior,

and Thomas Jefferson, and Lemen's mission under him, which I have

prepared for his son, Rev. James Lemen, Junior, at his request from

the family notes and diaries.

J. M. PECK,

Per A. M. W.

CHAPTER I.

The leading purpose of Thomas Jefferson in selecting James Lemen, of

Virginia, afterwards James Lemen, Senior, to go to Illinois as his

agent, was no doubt prompted by his great affection for Mr. Lemen and

his impression that a young man of such aptitude as a natural leader

would soon impress himself on the community, and as the advantages in

the territory were soon to be great, Jefferson was desirous to send

him out, and with the help of a few friends he provided a small fund

to give him, and also his friend who was going to Indiana on a like

mission, to be used by their families if need be, and if not to go to

good causes. There was also another motive with Jefferson; he looked

forward to a great pro-slavery contest to finally try to make Illinois

and Indiana slave states, and as Mr. Lemen was a natural born

anti-slavery leader and had proved himself such in Virginia by

inducing scores of masters to free their slaves through his prevailing

kindness of manner and Christian arguments, he was just Jefferson's

ideal of a man who could safely be trusted with his anti-slavery

mission in Illinois, and this was an important factor in his

appointment.

The last meeting between Mr. Lemen and Jefferson was at Annapolis,

Maryland, on May 2, 1784, a short time before he {p.33} sailed as

envoy to France, and all the terms between them were fully agreed

upon, and on Dec. 28, 1785, Jefferson's confidential agent gave Mr.

Lemen one hundred dollars of his funds, and in the summer of 1786 with

his wife and children he removed and settled in Illinois, at New

Design, in what is now Monroe County. A few years after his settlement

in Illinois Mr. Lemen was baptized into the Baptist church, and he

finally became a minister of the people of that faith. He eventually

became a great organizer of churches and by that fact, reinforced by

his other wonderful traits as a natural leader, he fully realized

Jefferson's fondest dreams and became a noted leader.

In 1789 Jefferson returned from his mission to France and his first

thought was of Mr. Lemen, his friend in Illinois, and he lost no time

in sending him a message of love and confidence by a friend who was

then coming to the West. [5]After Jefferson became President of the

United States he retained all of his early affection for Mr. Lemen,

and when S. H. Biggs, a resident of Illinois, who was in Virginia on

business and who was a warm friend of both Jefferson and Mr. Lemen,

called on him in 1808, when President, he inquired after him with all

the fondness of a father, and when told of Mr. Lemen's purpose to soon

organize a new church on a strictly anti-slavery basis Jefferson sent

him a message to proceed at once to form the new church and he sent it

a twenty-dollar contribution. Acting on Jefferson's suggestion, Mr.

Lemen promptly took the preliminary steps for the final formation of

the new church and when constituted it was called the Baptist Church

of Canteen Creek and Jefferson's contribution, with other funds, were

given to it. This church is now called the Bethel Baptist Church, and

it has a very interesting history.

But in view of the facts and circumstances the church might properly

have been called the "Thomas Jefferson Church," and what volumes these

facts speak for the beneficent and marvelous influence which Mr. Lemen

had over Jefferson, who was a reputed unbeliever. The great love he

had for James Lemen not only induced him to tolerate his churches but

he became an active adviser for their multiplication.

[30]The original agreement between Jefferson and Mr. Lemen was

strictly confidential; on the part of Jefferson, because, had it been

known, his opponents would have said {p.34} he sent paid emissaries

to Illinois and Indiana to shape matters to his own interests, and the

extreme South might have opposed his future preferment, if it were

known that he had made an anti-slavery pact with his territorial

agents; and it was secret on the part of Mr. Lemen because he never

wished Jefferson to give him any help and his singularly independent

nature made him feel that he would enjoy a greater liberty of action,

or feeling at least, if it were never known that his plans and

purposes to some extent were dictated and controlled by another, not

even by his great and good friend Jefferson; so the agreement between

them was strictly private. [30]And there was another circumstance

which finally determined Mr. Lemen to always preserve the secrecy, and

that was that some of Mr. Jefferson's opponents shortly before Mr.

Lemen's death informed him that he had become an absolute unbeliever,

and this so impressed his mind that he wept bitterly for fear, if the

fact should ever be known that he had an agreement with Jefferson,

that they would say that he was in alliance with an unbeliever in the

great life work he had performed, and he exacted a promise from his

sons, his brother-in-law, Rev. Benjamin Ogle, and Mr. Biggs, the only

persons who then knew of the agreement, that they would never divulge

it during his lifetime, a pledge they all religiously kept, and in

later years they told no one but the writer and a few other trusted

friends who have not, and never will, betray them. But the writer

advised them to carefully preserve all the facts and histories we are

now writing and to tell some of their families and let them publish

them at some future time, as much of the information is of public

interest.

As to Jefferson's being an absolute unbeliever, his critics were

mistaken. He held to the doctrine that the mind and the reason are the

only guides we have to judge of the authenticity and credibility of

all things, natural and divine, and this appears to have been the

chief basis on which Jefferson's critics based their charges against

him. But while these harsh criticisms in some measure misled Mr. Lemen

he never lost his great love for Jefferson and to the latest day of

his life he always mentioned his name with tenderness and affection. I

had hoped to complete this history in one chapter, but there appear to

be notes and materials enough for another. By oversight the notes of

Mr. Lemen's war record were not given me, but he honorably served an

enlistment of {p.35} two years under Washington, and returned to his

regiment at the siege of Yorktown and served until the surrender of

Cornwallis, but did not re-enlist.

CHAPTER II.

At their last meeting at Annapolis, Maryland, on May 2, 1784, when the

final terms in their agreement as to Mr. Lemen's mission in Illinois

were made, both he and Jefferson agreed that sooner or later, there

would be a great contest to try to fasten slavery on the Northwestern

Territory, and this prophesy was fully verified in spite of the fact

that Congress, at a later period, passed the Ordinance of 1787 forever

forbidding slavery; two contests arose in Illinois, the first to

confirm the territory and the second to confirm the state to freedom.

[17]From 1803 for several successive congresses Gen. William Henry

Harrison, then governor of the Northwestern Territory, with his

legislative council petitioned that body to repeal the anti-slavery

clause in the Ordinance of 1787 and to establish slavery in the

territory, but without avail, and finally recognizing that the

influence of Rev. James Lemen, Sr., was paramount with the people of

Illinois, he made persistent overtures for his approval of his

pro-slavery petitions, but he declined to act and promptly sent a

messenger to Indiana, paying him thirty dollars of the Jefferson fund

given him in Virginia to have the church and people there sign a

counter petition, meanwhile circulating one in Illinois among the

Baptists and others; and at the next session of Congress Gen.

Harrison's pro-slavery petitions for the first time encountered the

anti-slavery petitions of the Baptist people and others, and the

senate, before which the matter went at that time, voted to sustain

the anti-slavery petitions and against the repeal of the anti-slavery

clause in the Ordinance of 1787, and for the time the contest ended.

[21]The next anti-slavery contest was in the narrower limits of the

territory of Illinois, and it began with the events which called the

Bethel Baptist Church into existence. When Mr. Lemen received

President Jefferson's message in 1808 to proceed at once to organize

the next church on an anti-slavery basis and make it the center from

which the anti-slavery forces should act to finally make Illinois a

free state, he decided to act on it; but as he knew it would create a

{p.36} division in the churches and association, to disarm criticism

he labored several months to bring them over to the anti-slavery

cause, but finding that impossible he adopted Jefferson's advice and

prepared to open the contest. The first act was on July 8, 1809, in

regular session of the Richland Creek Baptist Church, where the people

had assembled from all quarters to see the opening of the anti-slavery

contest, when Rev. James Lemen, Sr., arose and in a firm but friendly

Christian spirit declared it would be better for both sides to

separate, as the contest for and against slavery must now open and not

close until Illinois should become a state. A division of both the

association and the churches followed, but finally at a great meeting

at the Richland Creek Baptist Church in a peaceful and Christian

manner, as being the better policy for both sides, separation was

adopted by unanimous vote and a number of members withdrew, and on

Dec. 10, 1809, they formed the "Baptist Church at Canteen Creek," (now

Bethel Baptist Church). Their articles of faith were brief. They

simply declared the Bible to be the pillar of their faith, and

proclaimed their good will for the brotherhood of humanity by

declaring their church to be "The Baptist Church of Christ, Friends to

Humanity, denying union and communion with all persons holding the

doctrine of perpetual, involuntary, hereditary slavery."

[23]The church, properly speaking, never entered politics, but

presently, when it became strong, the members all formed what they

called "The Illinois Anti-Slavery League," and it was this body that

conducted the anti-slavery contest. It always kept one of its members

and several of its friends in the Territorial Legislature, and five

years before the constitutional election in 1818 it had fifty resident

agents--men of like sympathies--in the several settlements throughout

the territory quietly at work, and the masterly manner in which they

did their duty was shown by a poll which they made of the voters some

few weeks before the election, which, on their side only varied a few

votes from the official count after the election. [17]With people

familiar with all the circumstances there is no divergence of views

but that the organization of the Bethel Church and its masterly

anti-slavery contest saved Illinois to freedom; but much of the credit

of the freedom of Illinois, as well as for the balance of the

territory, was due to Thomas Jefferson's faithful and efficient aid.

True to his promise to Mr. Lemen that slavery should {p.37} never

prevail in the Northwestern Territory or any part of it, he quietly

directed his leading confidential friends in Congress to steadily

defeat Gen. Harrison's pro-slavery petitions for the repeal of the

anti-slavery clause in the Ordinance of 1787, and his friendly aid to

Rev. James Lemen, Sr., and friends made the anti-slavery contest of

Bethel Church a success in saving the state to freedom.

The Jefferson-Lemen Compact The Relations of Thomas Jefferson and James Lemen in the Exclusion of Slavery from Illinois and Northern Territory with Related Documents 1781-1818 · 第 2 / 5 段