In those days, as in those of our Elizabeth, the king and courtiers took

parts in the ballets.[39] These _comédie-ballets_ were of singular

framework; comedies, in three acts, broad almost to farce, were

interspersed with dances: to this custom, to the three act pieces that

thus came into vogue, we owe some of the best of Molière's plays; when,

emancipated from the necessity of verse and five acts, he could give

full play to his sense of the ridiculous, and talent for comic

situation; and when, unshackled by rhyme, he threw the whole force of

his dry comic humour into the dialogue, and by a single word, a single

expression, stamp and immortalise a folly, holding it up for ever to the

ridicule it deserved. This seizing as it were on the bared inner kernel

of some fashionable vanity, and giving it its true and undisguised name

and definition, often shocked ears polite. They called that "vulgar,"

which was only stripping selfishness or ignorance of its cloak, and

bringing home to the hearts of the lowly-born the fact, that the follies

of the great are akin to their own: the people laughed to find the

courtier of the same flesh and blood; but the courtier drew up, and

said, that it was vulgar to present him _en dishabille_ to the

commonalty. "Let them rail," said Boileau, to the poet, whose genius he

so fully appreciated, "let them exclaim against you because your scenes

are agreeable to the vulgar. If you pleased less how much better pleased

would your censurers be!" "Le Mariage Forcé" was the first of these

comédies ballets.

[Sidenote: 1664.

Ætat.

42.]

The king danced as an Egyptian in the interludes while in the more

intellectual part of the performance Molière delighted the audience as

"Sganarelle"--the unfortunate man, who with such rough courtesy is

obliged to take a lady for better or for worse; a plot, founded on the

last English adventure of the count de Grammont, who, when leaving this

country, was followed by the brothers of _la belle_ Hamilton, who, with

their hands on the pummels of their swords, asked him if he had not

forgotten something left behind. "True," said the count, "I forgot to

marry your sister and instantly went back to repair his lapse of memory,

by making her countess de Grammont." The dialogue of this play is

exceedingly amusing; the metaphysical or learned pedants, whom

Sganarelle consults, are admirable and witty specimens of advisers, who

will only give counsel in their own way, in language understood only by

themselves. The "Amants Magnifiques" followed; it was written in the

course of a few days: it is now considered the most feeble of Molière's

plays; but it suited the occasion, and by a number of delicate and witty

impersonations of the manners of the times, lost to us now, it became

the greatest ornament of a succession of festivals; which under the name

of "Plaisirs de l'Ile enchantée," were got up in honour of mademoiselle

de Vallière; and, being prepared by various men of talent, gave the

impress of ideal magnificence to the pleasures of Louis XIV. On this

occasion Molière ventured to bring out the three first acts of the

"Tartuffe," hoping to gain the king's favourable ear at such a moment.

But it was ticklish ground; and Louis, while he declared that he

appreciated the good intentions of the author, forbade its being acted,

under the fear that it might bring real devotion into discredit. The

"Tartuffe" was a favourite with Molière, who, degraded by the clergy on

account of his profession, and aware that virtue and vice were neither

inherent in priest nor actor according to the garb, was naturally very

inimical to false devotion. He still hoped to gain leave to represent

his satire on hypocrites. He knew the king in his heart approved the

scope of his play, and was pleased that his own wit should have been

considered worthy of transfer to Molière's scenes--Molière himself

venturing to remind him of the incident, which occurred during a journey

to Lorraine, when Molière accompanied the monarch as his valet. When

travelling, Louis was accustomed to make his supper his best meal, to

which, of course, he brought a good appetite: one afternoon he invited

his former preceptor, Perefixe, bishop of Rhodes, to join him; but the

prelate, with affected sanctity, declined, as he had dined, and never

ate a second meal on a fast-day. The king saw a smile on a bystander's

face at this answer, and asked the cause. In reply, the courtier said,

that it arose from his sense of the bishop's self-denial, considering

the dinner he enjoyed. The detail of the dinner followed, dish after

dish in long succession; and the king, as each viand was named,

exclaimed, _le pauvre homme!_ with such comic variety of voice and look,

that Molière, who was present, felt the wit conveyed, and transferred

it to his play, in which _Orgon_, in the simplicity of his heart,

repeats this exclamation when the creature-comforts in which _Tartuffe_

indulges are detailed to him. But though this compliment was not lost on

the king, he did not yield; and Molière was obliged to content

himself--after acting it at Rainey, the country house of the prince of

Condé--by reading it in society, and thus giving opportunity for it to

awaken the most lively curiosity in Paris. There is a well-known print

of his reading it to the celebrated Ninon de l'Enclos, whose talents and

wonderful tact for seizing the ridiculous he appreciated highly; and to

whom he partly owed the idea of the play, from an occurrence that befel

her.[40] Yet he was not consoled by these private readings and the sort

of applause he thus gained, and he grew more bitter against the devotees

for their opposition: in his play on the subject of Don Juan, "Le Festin

de Saint Pierre," brought out soon after, he alludes bitterly to the

interdiction laid on his favourite work. "All other vices," he says,

"are held up to public censure; but hypocrisy is privileged to place the

hand on every one's mouth, and to enjoy impunity." The hypocrites

revenged themselves by calling his _Festin_ blasphemous. The king,

however, remained his firm friend, and tried to compensate for the

hardship he suffered on this occasion by giving his name to his company,

and granting him a pension in consequence.

It was the custom for the soldiers of the body guard of the king, and

other privileged troops, to frequent the theatre without paying. These

people filled the pit, to the great detriment of the profits of the

actors. Molière, incited by his comrades, applied to the king, who

issued an order to abrogate this privilege. The soldiers were furious;

they went in crowds to the theatre, resolved to force an entrance; the

unfortunate door-keeper was killed by a thousand sword-thrusts, and the

rioters rushed into the house, resolved to revenge themselves on the

actors, who trembled at the storm they had brought on themselves. The

younger Bejart encountered their fury with a joke, that somewhat

appeased them: he was dressed for the part of an old man; and came

tottering forward, imploring them to spare the life of a poor old man,

seventy-five years of age, who had only a few days of life left.

Molière made them a speech; and peace was restored, with no greater

injury than fear to the actors--except to one, who in his terror tried

to get through a hole in the wall to escape, and stuck so fast that he

could neither get out nor in, till, peace being restored, the hole was

enlarged. The king was ready to punish the soldiers as mutineers, but

Molière was too prudent to wish to make enemies; when the companies

were assembled, and put under arms, that the ringleaders might be

punished, he addressed them in a speech, in which he declared that he

did not wish to make them pay, but that the order was levelled against

those who assumed their name and claimed their privilege: and that, in

truth, a gratuitous entrance to the theatre was a right beneath their

notice; and, by touching their pride, he brought them for a time to

submit to the new order.

In holding up follies or vices to ridicule Molière made enemies; and by

attacking whole bodies of men, dangerous ones; yet, how much did the

public owe to the spirit and wit with which he exposed the delusions to

which they were often the victims. He first attacked the _faculty_, as

it is called in "L'Amour Médecin," in which he brings forward four of

the physicians in ordinary to the king, empirics of the first order,

under Greek names, invented by Boileau for the occasion: nor can we

wonder, when we read the _mémoires_ and letters of the times, at the

contempt in which Molière held the medicinal art. One specific came

into fashion after the other; quack succeeded to quack; and the more

ignorant the greater was the pretension, the greater also the number of

dupes. Reading these, and turning to the pages of Molière, we see in a

minute that he by no means exaggerated, while he with his happy art

seized exactly on the most ridiculous traits.

[Sidenote: 1666.

Ætat.

42.]

It has been said that the "Misanthrope," now considered by the French as

Molière's _chef-d'œuvre_, was coldly received at first--a tradition

contradicted by the register of the theatre; it went through twenty-one

consecutive representations, and excited great interest in Paris. Still

in this he raises his voice against the false taste of the age; and this

with so little exaggeration, that the pit applauded the sonnet

introduced in ridicule of the prevailing poetry, and were not a little

astonished when _Alceste_ proves that it possesses no merit whatever.

The audience, seeing that ridicule of reigning fashions was the scope of

the play, fancied that various persons were intended to be represented;

and, among others, it was supposed that the duke de Montauzier, the

husband of the _Précieuse_ Julie d'Angennes, was portrayed in

_Alceste_. It is said, that the duke went to see the play, and came back

quite satisfied; saying, that the "Misanthrope" was a perfectly honest

and excellent man, and that a great honour, which he should never

forget, was done him by assimilating them together. There is indeed in

_Alceste_ a sensibility, joined to his sincerity and goodness of heart,

that renders him very attractive; and thus, as is often the case when

genius mirrors nature, the ridicule the author pretends to wish to throw

on the victim recoils on the apparently triumphant personages: the

time-serving _Philinthe_ is quite contemptible; and every honest heart

echoes the disgust _Alceste_ feels for the deceits and selfishness of

society. In truth, there is some cause to suspect that Molière found in

his own sensitive and upright heart the homefelt traits of _Alceste_'s

character, as that of his wife furnished him with the coquetry of

_Célimène_; and when, in the end, the _Misanthrope_ resolves to hide

from the world, one of the natures of the author poured itself forth; a

nature, checked in real life by the necessities of his situation and the

living excitement of his genius.

During the same year the "Médecin malgré Lui" was brought out; whose

wit and comedy stamps it as one of his best: other minor pieces, by

command, occupied his time, without increasing his fame. His mind was

set on bringing out the "Tartuffe." The king had yielded to the outcry

against it; but in his heart he was very desirous of having it acted. On

occasion of a piece being played, called "Scaramouche Hermite," which

also delineated immorality cloaked by religion; the king said to the

great Coudé, "I should like to know why those who are so scandalised by

Molière's play, say nothing against that of _Scaramouche_?" The prince

replied. "The reason is, that _Scaramouche_ makes game of heaven and

religion, which these people care nothing for; but Molière satirises

them themselves, and this they cannot bear."[41] Confident in the king's

support, and anxious to bring out his play, Molière entertained the

hope of mollifying his opponents by concessions: he altered his piece,

expunged the parts most disliked, and changed the name _Tartuffe_,

already become odious to bigot ears, to the _Imposteur_. In this new

shape his comedy was acted once; but, on the following day the first

president, Lamoignon, forbade it. Molière dispatched two principal

actors to the king, then in Flanders, to obtain permission; but Louis

only promised that the play should be re-examined on his return. Thus,

once more, the piece was laid aside; and Molière forced to content

himself with private readings, and the universal interest excited on the

subject. Meanwhile he brought out "Amphitryon," "L'Avare," and "George

Dandin" all of which rank among his best plays. The first has a more

fanciful and playful spirit added to its comedy than any other of his

productions, and displays more elegance and a more subtle wit.

As a specimen of mingled wit and humour, let us take the scene between

Sosia and Mercury, when the latter, assuming his name and appearance,

attempts to deprive him of his identity by force of blows. Sosia

exclaims,--

"N'importe. Je ne puis m'anéantir pour toi,

Et souffrir un discours si loin de l'apparence.

Être ce que je suis est-il en ta puissance?

Et puis-je cesser d'être moi?

S'avisa-t-on jamais d'une chose pareille?

Et peut-on démentir cent indices pressants?

Rêvé-je? Est-ce que je sommeille?

Ai-je l'esprit troublé par des transports puissants?

Ne sens-je bien que je veille?

Ne suis-je pas dans mon bon sens?

Mon maître Amphitryon ne m'a-t-il pas commis

À venir en ces lieux vers Alemène sa femme?

Ne lui dois-je pas faire, en lui vantant sa flamme,

Un récit de ses faits contre notre ennemi?

Ne suis-je pas du port arrivé tout à l'heure?

Ne tiens-je pas une lanterne en main?

Ne te trouvé-je pas devant notre demeure?

Ne t'y parlé-je pas d'un esprit tout humain?

Ne te tiens-tu pas fort de ma poltronnerie,

Pour m'empêcher d'entrer chez nous?

N'as-tu pas sur mon dos exercé ta furie?

Ne m'as tu pas roué de coups?

Ah, tout cela n'est que trop veritable;

Et, plût au ciel, le fût-il moins!

Cesse donc d'insulter au sort d'un misérable;

Et laisse à mon dévoir s'acquitter de ses soins.

MERCURE.

Arrête, ou sur ton dos le moindre pas attire

Un assommant éclat de mon juste courroux.

Tout ce que tu viens de dire,

Est à moi, hormis les coups.

SOSIE.

Ce matin du vaisseau, plein de frayeur en l'âme,

Cette lanterne sait comme je suis parti.

Amphitryon, du camp, vers Alemène sa femme,

M'a-t-il pas envoyé?

MERCURE.

Vous avez menti.

C'est moi qu'Amphitryon députe vers Alemène

Et qui du port Persique arrivé de ce pas;

Moi qui viens annoncer la valeur de son bras,

Qui nous fait remporter une victoire pleine,

Et de nos ennemis a mis le chef à bas.

C'est moi qui suis Sosie enfin, de certitude,

Fils de Dave, honnête berger;

Frère d'Arpage, mort en pays étranger;

Mari de Cléanthis la prude,

Dont l'humeur me fait enrager;

Qui dans Thèbes ai reçu mille coups d'étrivière

Sans en avoir jamais dit rien;

Et jadis en public fus marqué par derrière

Pour être trop homme de bien.

SOSIE (_bas, à part_).

Il a raison. A moins d'être Sosie,

On ne peut pas savoir tout ce qu'il dit;

Et, dans l'étonnement dont mon âme est saisie,

Je commence, à mon tour, a le croire un petit.

En effet, maintenant que je le considère,

Je vois qu'il à de moi taille, mine, action.

Faisons-lui quelque question,

Afin, d'éclaircir ce mystère.

(_Haut._)

Parmi tout le butin fait sur nos ennemis,

Qu'est-ce qu'Amphitryon obtient pour son partage?

MERCURE.

Cinq fort gros diamants en nœud proprement mis,

Dont leur chef se paroit comme d'un rare ouvrage.

SOSIE.

A qui destine-t'-il un si riche présent?

MERCURE.

A sa femme, et sur elle il le veut voir paroitre.

SOSIE.

Mais où, pour l'apporter, est-il mis à présent?

MERCURE.

Dans un coffret scellé des armes de mon maître.

SOSIE (_à part_).

Il ne ment pas d'un mot à chaque repartie,

Et de moi je commence à douter tout de bon.

Près de moi par la force, il est déjà Sosie,

Il pourroit bien encore l'être par la raison;

Pourtant quand je me tâte et que je me rappelle,

Il me resemble que je suis moi.

Où puis-je rencontrer quelque clarté fidèle.

Pour démêler ce que je voi?

Ce que j'ai fait tout seul, et que n'a vu personne,

A moins d'être moi-même, on ne le peut savoir:

Par cette question il faut que je l'étonne;

C'est de quoi le confondre, et nous allons le voir.

(_Haut._)

Lorsqu'on étoit aux mains, que fis-tu dans nos tentes,

Où tu courus seul te fourrer?

MERCURE.

D'un jambon----

SOSIE (_bas, à part_).

L'y voila!

MERCURE.

Que j'allai déterrer,

Je coupai bravement deux tranches succulentes,

Dont je sus fort bien me bourrer.

Et, joignant à cela d'un vin que l'on ménage,

Et dont, avant le goût, les yeux se contentoient.

Je pris un peu de courage,

Pour nos gens qui se battoient.

SOSIE.

Cette preuve sans pareille

En sa faveur conclut bien,

Et l'on n'y peut dire rien,

S'il n'étoit dans la bouteille."

And again, when Sosia tries to explain to Amphitryon how another himself

prevented him from entering his house:--

"Faut-il le répéter vingt fois de même sorte?

Moi vous dis-je, ce moi, plus robuste que moi,

Ce moi qui s'est de force emparé de la porte,

Ce moi qui m'a fait filer doux;

Ce moi qui le seul moi veut être,

Ce moi de moi-mème jaloux,

Ce moi vaillant, dont le courroux

Au moi poltron s'est fait connoître,

Enfin ce moi qui suis chez nous

Ce moi qui s'est montré mon maitre;

Ce moi qui m'a roué de coups."

And his conclusive decision with regard to his master:--

"Je ne me trompois pas, messieurs, ce mot termine,

Toute l'irrésolution:

Le véritable Amphitryon

Est l'Amphitryon où l'on dine."

The "Avare" has certainly faults, which a great German critic has

pointed out[42]; but these do not interfere with the admirable spirit of

the dialogue, and the humorous display of the miser's foibles. "George

Dandin" was considered by his friends as a more dangerous experiment.

There were so many George Dandins in the world. One in particular was

pointed out to him as being at the same time an influential person, who,

offended by his play, might cause its ill success. Molière took the

prudent part of offering to read his comedy to him, previously to its

being acted. The man felt himself very highly honoured: he assembled his

friends; the play was read, and applauded; and in the sequel supported

by this very person when it appeared on the stage. Poor George Dandin!

there is an ingenuousness and directness in him that inspires us with

respect, in spite of the ridiculous situations in which he is placed:

and while Molière represents to the life the annoyances to arise to a

bourgeois in allying himself to nobility, he makes the nobles so very

contemptible, either by their stupidity or vice, that not by one word in

the play can a rank-struck spirit be discerned. As, for instance, which

cuts the most ridiculous figure in the following comic dialogue? The

nobles, we think. George Dandin comes with a complaint to the father and

mother of his wife, with regard to her ill-conduct. His father-in-law,

M. de Sotenville (the very name is _bien trouvé_,--sot en ville,)

asks--

"Qu'est-ce, mon gendre? vous paroissez troublé.

GEORGE DANDIN.

Aussi en ai-je du sujet; et----

MADAME DE SOTENVILLE.

Mon dieu! notre gendre, que vous avez peu de civilité, de ne pas

saluer les gens quand vous les approchez!

GEORGE DANDIN.

Ma foi! ma belle-mère, c'est que j'ai d'autres choses en tête;

et----

MADAME DE SOTENVILLE.

Encore! est-il possible, notre gendre, que vous sachiez si peu

votre monde, et qu'il n'y ait pas moyen de vous instruire de la manière

qu'il faut vivre parmi les personnes de qualité?

GEORGE DANDIN.

Comment?

MADAME DE SOTENVILLE.

Ne vous déférez-vous jamais, avec moi, de la familiarité de ce mot

de belle-mère, et ne sauriez-vous vous accoutumer à me dire Madame?

GEORGE DANDIN.

Parbleu! si vous m'appelez votre gendre, il me semble que je puis

vous appeler belle-mère?

MADAME DE SOTENVILLE.

Il y a fort à dire, et les choses ne sont pas égales. Apprenez,

s'il vous plait, que ce n'est pas à vous à vous servir de ce mot-là

avec une personne de ma condition; que, tout notre gendre que vous

soyez, il y a grande différence de vous à nous, et que vous devez vous

connoître.

MONSIEUR DE SOTENVILLE.

C'en est assez, m'amour: laissons cela.

MADAME DE SOTENVILLE.

Mon dieu! Monsieur de Sotenville, vous avez des indulgences qui

n'appartiennent qu'à vous, et vous ne savez pas vous faire rendre par

les gens ce qui vous est dû.

MONSIEUR DE SOTENVILLE.

Corbleu! pardonnez-moi; on ne peut point me faire des leçons

là-dessus; et j'ai su montrer en ma vie, par vingt actions de vigueur,

que je ne suis point homme à démordre jamais d'une partie de mes

prétentions: mais il suffit de lui avoir donné un petit avertissement.

Sachons un peu, mon gendre, ce que vous avez dans l'esprit.

GEORGE DANDIN.

Puisqu'il faut donc parler catégoriquement, je vous dirai,

Monsieur de Sotenville, que j'ai bien de----

MONSIEUR DE SOTENVILLE.

Doucement, mon gendre. Apprenez qu'il n'est pas respectueux

d'appeler les gens par leur nom, et qu'à ceux qui sont au-dessus de

nous, il faut dire Monsieur, tout court.

GEORGE DANDIN.

Hé bien! Monsieur tout court, et nonplus Monsieur de Sotenville,

j'ai à vous dire que ma femme me donne----

MONSIEUR DE SOTENVILLE.

Tout beau! Apprenez aussi que vous ne devez pas dire ma femme,

quand vous parlez de notre fille.

GEORGE DANDIN.

J'enrage! Comment, ma femme n'est pas ma femme?

MADAME DE SOTENVILLE.

Oui, notre gendre, elle est votre femme; mais il ne vous est

pas permis de l'appeler ainsi; et c'est tout ce que vous pourriez faire

si vous aviez épousé une de vos pareilles.

GEORGE DANDIN.

Ah! George Dandin, ou t'es-tu fourré?"

But we must leave off. Sir Walter Scott says that, as often as he opened

the volume of Molière's works during the composition of his article on

that author, he found it impossible to lay it out of his hand until he

had completed a scene, however little to his immediate purpose of

consulting it; and thus we could prolong and multiply extracts to the

amusement of ourselves and the reader; but we restrain ourselves, and,

returning to the subject that caused this quotation, we must say, that

we differ entirely from Rousseau and other critics who adopt his

opinions; and even Schlegel, who accuses the author of being guilty of

currying favour with rank in this comedy, and making honest mediocrity

ridiculous. If genius was to adapt its works to the rules of

philosophers, instead of following the realities of life, we should

never read in books of honesty duped, and vice triumphant: whether we

should be the gainers by this change is a question. It may be added,

also, that Molière did not represent, in "George Dandin," honesty

ill-used, so much as folly punished; and, at any rate, where vice is on

one side and ridicule on the other, we must think that class worse used

to whom the former is apportioned as properly belonging. In spite of

philosophers, truth, such as it exists, is the butt at which all writers

ought to aim. It is different, indeed, when a servile spirit paints

greatness, virtue, and dignity on one side--poverty, ignorance, and

folly, on the other.

At length the time came when Molière was allowed to bring out the

"Tartuffe" in its original shape, with its original name. Its success

was unequalled: it went through forty-four consecutive representations.

At a period when religious disputes between molinist and jansenist ran

high in France--when it was the fashion to be devout, and each family

had a confessor and director of their consciences, to whom they looked

up with reverence, and whose behests they obeyed--a play which showed up

the hypocrisy of those who cloaked the worst designs, and brought

discord and hatred into families, under the guise of piety, was

doubtless a useful production; yet the "Tartuffe" is not an agreeable

play. Borne away by his notion of the magnitude of the evil he attacked,

and by his idea of the usefulness of the lesson, Molière attached

himself greatly to it. The plot is admirably managed, the characters

excellently contrasted, its utility probably of the highest kind; but

Molière, hampered by the necessity of giving as little umbrage as

possible to true devotees, was forced by the spirit of the times to

regard his subject more seriously than is quite accordant with comedy:

there is something heavy in the conduct of the piece, and disgust is

rather excited than amusement. The play is still popular; and, through

the excellent acting of a living performer, it has enjoyed great

popularity in these days in its English dress: still it is disagreeable;

and the part foisted in on our stage, of the strolling methodist

preacher, becomes, by its farce, the most amusing part in the play.[43]

Lives of the most eminent literary and scientific men of France, Vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 10 / 33 段