I. THE BOOKCASE AT HOME

To give an account of one’s reading is in some sort to give an account of

one’s life; and I hope that I shall not offend those who follow me in

these papers, if I cannot help speaking of myself in speaking of the

authors I must call my masters: my masters not because they taught me

this or that directly, but because I had such delight in them that I

could not fail to teach myself from them whatever I was capable of

learning. I do not know whether I have been what people call a great

reader; I cannot claim even to have been a very wise reader; but I have

always been conscious of a high purpose to read much more, and more

discreetly, than I have ever really done, and probably it is from the

vantage-ground of this good intention that I shall sometimes be found

writing here rather than from the facts of the case.

But I am pretty sure that I began right, and that if I had always kept

the lofty level which I struck at the outset I should have the right to

use authority in these reminiscences without a bad conscience. I shall

try not to use authority, however, and I do not expect to speak here of

all my reading, whether it has been much or little, but only of those

books, or of those authors that I have felt a genuine passion for. I

have known such passions at every period of my life, but it is mainly of

the loves of my youth that I shall write, and I shall write all the more

frankly because my own youth now seems to me rather more alien than that

of any other person.

I think that I came of a reading race, which has always loved literature

in a way, and in spite of varying fortunes and many changes. From a

letter of my great-grandmother’s written to a stubborn daughter upon some

unfilial behavior, like running away to be married, I suspect that she

was fond of the high-colored fiction of her day, for she tells the wilful

child that she has “planted a dagger in her mother’s heart,” and I should

not be surprised if it were from this fine-languaged lady that my

grandfather derived his taste for poetry rather than from his father, who

was of a worldly wiser mind. To be sure, he became a Friend by

Convincement as the Quakers say, and so I cannot imagine that he was

altogether worldly; but he had an eye to the main chance: he founded the

industry of making flannels in the little Welsh town where he lived, and

he seems to have grown richer, for his day and place, than any of us have

since grown for ours. My grandfather, indeed, was concerned chiefly in

getting away from the world and its wickedness. He came to this country

early in the nineteenth century and settled his family in a log-cabin in

the Ohio woods, that they might be safe from the sinister influences of

the village where he was managing some woollen-mills. But he kept his

affection for certain poets of the graver, not to say gloomier sort, and

he must have suffered his children to read them, pending that great

question of their souls’ salvation which was a lifelong trouble to him.

My father, at any rate, had such a decided bent in the direction of

literature, that he was not content in any of his several economical

experiments till he became the editor of a newspaper, which was then the

sole means of satisfying a literary passion. His paper, at the date when

I began to know him, was a living, comfortable and decent, but without

the least promise of wealth in it, or the hope even of a much better

condition. I think now that he was wise not to care for the advancement

which most of us have our hearts set upon, and that it was one of his

finest qualities that he was content with a lot in life where he was not

exempt from work with his hands, and yet where he was not so pressed by

need but he could give himself at will not only to the things of the

spirit, but the things of the mind too. After a season of scepticism he

had become a religious man, like the rest of his race, but in his own

fashion, which was not at all the fashion of my grandfather: a Friend who

had married out of Meeting, and had ended a perfervid Methodist. My

father, who could never get himself converted at any of the camp-meetings

where my grandfather often led the forces of prayer to his support, and

had at last to be given up in despair, fell in with the writings of

Emanuel Swedenborg, and embraced the doctrine of that philosopher with a

content that has lasted him all the days of his many years. Ever since I

can remember, the works of Swedenborg formed a large part of his library;

he read them much himself, and much to my mother, and occasionally a

“Memorable Relation” from them to us children. But he did not force them

upon our notice, nor urge us to read them, and I think this was very

well. I suppose his conscience and his reason kept him from doing so.

But in regard to other books, his fondness was too much for him, and when

I began to show a liking for literature he was eager to guide my choice.

His own choice was for poetry, and the most of our library, which was not

given to theology, was given to poetry. I call it the library now, but

then we called it the bookcase, and that was what literally it was,

because I believe that whatever we had called our modest collection of

books, it was a larger private collection than any other in the town

where we lived. Still it was all held, and shut with glass doors, in a

case of very few shelves. It was not considerably enlarged during my

childhood, for few books came to my father as editor, and he indulged

himself in buying them even more rarely. My grandfather’s book store

(it was also the village drug-store) had then the only stock of

literature for sale in the place; and once, when Harper & Brothers’ agent

came to replenish it, he gave my father several volumes for review. One

of these was a copy of Thomson’s Seasons, a finely illustrated edition,

whose pictures I knew long before I knew the poetry, and thought them the

most beautiful things that ever were. My father read passages of the

book aloud, and he wanted me to read it all myself. For the matter of

that he wanted me to read Cowper, from whom no one could get anything but

good, and he wanted me to read Byron, from whom I could then have got no

harm; we get harm from the evil we understand. He loved Burns, too, and

he used to read aloud from him, I must own, to my inexpressible

weariness. I could not away with that dialect, and I could not then feel

the charm of the poet’s wit, nor the tender beauty of his pathos. Moore,

I could manage better; and when my father read “Lalla Rookh” to my mother

I sat up to listen, and entered into all the woes of Iran in the story of

the “Fire Worshippers.” I drew the line at the “Veiled Prophet of

Khorassan,” though I had some sense of the humor of the poet’s conception

of the critic in “Fadladeen.” But I liked Scott’s poems far better, and

got from Ispahan to Edinburgh with a glad alacrity of fancy. I followed

the “Lady of the Lake” throughout, and when I first began to contrive

verses of my own I found that poem a fit model in mood and metre.

Among other volumes of verse on the top shelf of the bookcase, of which I

used to look at the outside without penetrating deeply within, were

Pope’s translation of the Iliad and the Odyssey, and Dryden’s Virgil,

pretty little tomes in tree-calf, published by James Crissy in

Philadelphia, and illustrated with small copper-plates, which somehow

seemed to put the matter hopelessly beyond me. It was as if they said to

me in so many words that literature which furnished the subjects of such

pictures I could not hope to understand, and need not try. At any rate,

I let them alone for the time, and I did not meddle with a volume of

Shakespeare, in green cloth and cruelly fine print, which overawed me in

like manner with its wood-cuts. I cannot say just why I conceived that

there was something unhallowed in the matter of the book; perhaps this

was a tint from the reputation of the rather profligate young man from

whom my father had it. If he were not profligate I ask his pardon. I

have not the least notion who he was, but that was the notion I had of

him, whoever he was, or wherever he now is. There may never have been

such a young man at all; the impression I had may have been pure

invention of my own, like many things with children, who do not very

distinctly know their dreams from their experiences, and live in the

world where both project the same quality of shadow.

There were, of course, other books in the bookcase, which my

consciousness made no account of, and I speak only of those I remember.

Fiction there was none at all that I can recall, except Poe’s ‘Tales of

the Grotesque and the Arabesque’ (I long afflicted myself as to what

those words meant, when I might easily have asked and found out) and

Bulwer’s Last Days of Pompeii, all in the same kind of binding. History

is known, to my young remembrance of that library, by a History of the

United States, whose dust and ashes I hardly made my way through; and by

a ‘Chronicle of the Conquest of Granada’, by the ever dear and precious

Fray Antonio Agapida, whom I was long in making out to be one and the

same as Washington Irving.

In school there was as little literature then as there is now, and I

cannot say anything worse of our school reading; but I was not really

very much in school, and so I got small harm from it. The printing-

office was my school from a very early date. My father thoroughly

believed in it, and he had his beliefs as to work, which he illustrated

as soon as we were old enough to learn the trade he followed. We could

go to school and study, or we could go into the printing-office and work,

with an equal chance of learning, but we could not be idle; we must do

something, for our souls’ sake, though he was willing enough we should

play, and he liked himself to go into the woods with us, and to enjoy the

pleasures that manhood can share with childhood. I suppose that as the

world goes now we were poor. His income was never above twelve hundred a

year, and his family was large; but nobody was rich there or then; we

lived in the simple abundance of that time and place, and we did not know

that we were poor. As yet the unequal modern conditions were undreamed

of (who indeed could have dreamed of them forty or fifty years ago?) in

the little Southern Ohio town where nearly the whole of my most happy

boyhood was passed.

Literature and Life (Complete) · 第 165 / 228 题