I.

The trouble in judging anything is that if you have the materials for an

intelligent criticism, the case is already prejudiced in your hands.

You do not bring a free mind to it, and all your efforts to free your

mind are a species of gymnastics more or less admirable, but not really

effective for the purpose. The best way is to own yourself unfair at the

start, and then you can have some hope of doing yourself justice, if not

your subject. In other words, if you went to see the Hamlet of Mme.

Bernhardt frankly expecting to be disappointed, you were less likely in

the end to be disappointed in your expectations, and you could not blame

her if you were. To be ideally fair to that representation, it would be

better not to have known any other Hamlet, and, above all, the Hamlet of

Shakespeare.

From the first it was evident that she had three things overwhelmingly

against her--her sex, her race, and her speech. You never ceased to feel

for a moment that it was a woman who was doing that melancholy Dane, and

that the woman was a Jewess, and the Jewess a French Jewess. These three

removes put a gulf impassable between her utmost skill and the

impassioned irresolution of that inscrutable Northern nature which is in

nothing so masculine as its feminine reluctances and hesitations, or so

little French as in those obscure emotions which the English poetry

expressed with more than Gallic clearness, but which the French words

always failed to convey. The battle was lost from the first, and all you

could feel about it for the rest was that if it was magnificent it was

not war.

While the battle went on I was the more anxious to be fair, because I

had, as it were, pre-espoused the winning side; and I welcomed, in the

interest of critical impartiality, another Hamlet which came to mind,

through readily traceable associations. This was a Hamlet also of French

extraction in the skill and school of the actor, but as much more deeply

derived than the Hamlet of Mme. Bernhardt as the large imagination of

Charles Fechter transcended in its virile range the effect of her

subtlest womanish intuition. His was the first blond Hamlet known to our

stage, and hers was also blond, if a reddish-yellow wig may stand for a

complexion; and it was of the quality of his Hamlet in masterly

technique.

Literature and Life (Complete) · 第 87 / 228 题