VI.

There is no royal road to excellence in literature, but the young

contributor need not be dismayed at that. Royal roads are the ways that

kings travel, and kings are mostly dull fellows, and rarely have a good

time. They do not go along singing; the spring that trickles into the

mossy log is not for them, nor

“The wildwood flower that simply blows.”

But the traveller on the country road may stop for each of these; and it

is not a bad condition of his progress that he must move so slowly that

he can learn every detail of the landscape, both earth and sky, by heart.

The trouble with success is that it is apt to leave life behind, or

apart. The successful writer especially is in danger of becoming

isolated from the realities that nurtured in him the strength to win

success. When he becomes famous, he becomes precious to criticism, to

society, to all the things that do not exist from themselves, or have not

the root of the matter in them.

Therefore, I think that a young writer’s upward course should be slow and

beset with many obstacles, even hardships. Not that I believe in

hardships as having inherent virtues; I think it is stupid to regard them

in that way; but they oftener bring out the virtues inherent in the

sufferer from them than what I may call the ‘softships’; and at least

they stop him, and give him time to think.

This is the great matter, for if we prosper forward rapidly, we have no

time for anything but prospering forward rapidly. We have no time for

art, even the art by which we prosper.

I would have the young contributor above all things realize that success

is not his concern. Good work, true work, beautiful work is his affair,

and nothing else. If he does this, success will take care of itself.

He has no business to think of the thing that will take. It is the

editor’s business to think of that, and it is the contributor’s business

to think of the thing that he can do with pleasure, the high pleasure

that comes from the sense of worth in the thing done. Let him do the

best he can, and trust the editor to decide whether it will take.

It will take far oftener than anything he attempts perfunctorily; and

even if the editor thinks it will not take, and feels obliged to return

it for that reason, he will return it with a real regret, with the honor

and affection which we cannot help feeling for any one who has done a

piece of good work, and with the will and the hope to get something from

him that will take the next time, or the next, or the next.

Literature and Life (Complete) · 第 28 / 228 题